Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 08-06-84CALL TO ORDER REPORTS TUSTIN PLANNING ~ISSION NO. 1 ACTION AGENOA 8-6-84 July 23 1984 6:30 p.m. 6:30 P.M., CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER ROLL CALL AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WELL, WHITE, SHARP (All present) PUBLIC MEETING · Discussion of possible changes to the zoning ordinance concerning alcoholic beverage licensing. Chairman Sharp called the public meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. with no particular rules of order e~hastztng that it is a free forum to discuss alcoholic beverage licensing. Representatives from Parents Who Care presented their concerns. Don Lam explained staff's position according to interpretation of the Code. Ne explained the requirements for a Use Petit and the difference between on-sale and off-sale alcoholic beverage per. ts. Ken Kelley, District Administrator for ABC, ~as present and explained ABC's Involvement in the porudt process. He stated that ABC conveys the privilege to sell alcohol not the type of business. He recmIended the City require a Use Permit for any ltquor establishment; on-sale or off-sale. After Commission discussion, it was decided to continue this publtc meeting to 7:00 p.m. on ffednesday, August 15, 1984 and was requested to have a representative from ABC, the Police Department, and school district present. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION Chairman Sharp convened the meeting at - 7:45 p.m. Ainslte lead the pledge, - Puckett gave the invocation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES PUBLIC CONCERNS None CONSENT CALENDAR For Meeting Held July g, 1984 Moved by Wetl, second by Puckett, to approve the ~nutes, 5-0 (limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSEt~T CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION. None Planning Commission Action Agenda July 23, 1984 page two CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: (7:30 p.m.) 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-3b - OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN A combined and revised Open Space and Conservation Element that addresses the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources for the City of Tustin. Programs and plans are proposed that will conservate, maintain and assure the continued availability of land for the production of food and fiber, for the enjoyment of scenic beauty, for recreation, and for the use of natural resources. An environmental assessment of the Open Space and Conservation Element Is included and referenced within the document. Presentation: Edward Knight, Associate Planner Don Lam gave staff's presentation as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated July 23, 1984. The greatest concern was the potential conflict between the elements and East Tusttn plan. Roved by Puckett, second by #etl to close the publtc hearing and withdraw the element until it is m-advertised for hearing at a joint meeting of the Planntng Commission and Ctty Counctl on September 10, 1984. 6-0 vote. 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-3c .- RECREATION ELEMENT A new optional element of the General Plan indicating a comprehensive system of areas and public sites for recreation. Programs are proposed that address the community-wide needs and requirements for recreational areas. An environmental assessment of the Recreation Element is included and referenced within the document. Presentation: Edward Knight, Associate Planner Don Lamm gave staff's presentation as contained in the Report to the Planning Comdsston dated July 23, 1984. The greatest concern was the potential confltct between the elements and East Tusttn plan. Roved by Puckett, second by Well to close the publtc hearing and withdraw the element until it is re-advertised for hearing at a joint meeting of the Planning Comdsston and City Council, September 10, 1984. 5-0 vote Planning Commission Action Agenda July 23, 1984 page three Applicant: Locati on: Request: USE PERMIT 84-12 Garrison Management, Inc., on behalf of P.D.F. (a general partnership) 1122-1192 Laguna Road Authorization to develop a 10,000 square foot automotive service center with a freeway identification sign Presentation: Alan Warren, Senior Planner Don Lamm explained the circumstances behind the ~cd for a continuance. Alan Warren commented that the applicant was working off a revised site plan for consideration by the Planning Ccmm4sston at their next meeting. Moved by Wet1, second by Puckett to continue the public hearing to August 13, 1904, 5-0 vote. AONI#ISlltATIVE PA~TERS A. Old Business None. 1. Don Lamm introduced this item for Commission consideration: Applicant: Raymond Salmi Location: 333 E1Camino Real Request: Extend Variance 83-6 fo~ six months to vary from parking standards allowing reoccupancy of vacant non-conforming building. After Mr. Laum's presentation of staff's Report to the Planning Co~sston dated July 23, 1904, C~Mmtsstoner Wet1 moved, second by Puckett to extend Variance 83-6 six months by minute action, 5-0 vote. 2. Commissioner White introduced a letter requesting the Planning Commission re-agendize the Ordinance regulating satellite dish antennae for further consideration before sending it to the City Council. He felt that in the Ordinance's present version it places unnecessary restrictions on the operation of such antennae. Roved by White, second by Puckett to direct staff to advertise for public hearing the Ordinance o~ the satellite dish antenna, 5-0 vote. B. New Business None. Planning Commission Action Agenda July 23, 1984 page four STAFF CONCERNS 1. Departmental Status Report. 0ral Presentation: Alan Warren, Senior Planner 2. Report on Council Actions - July 16, 1984. 0ral presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development CO~ISSION CONCERNS ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Sharp adjourned the meeting at 8:14 p,m. to the next regular meeting on August 13, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER TUSTIN PLANNING ~O))IISSI AGENDA July 23 1984 6:30 p.m. 6:30 P.M., CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER ROLL CALL AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WEIL, WHITE, SHARP PUBLIC HEETING Discussion of possible changes to the zoning ordinance concerning alcoholic beverage licensing. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MI#Ull~S PUBLIC CONCERNS For Meeting Held July 9, 1984 (limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD CONSENT CALENDAR ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY' ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION. None CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: (7:30 p.m.) 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-3b - OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN A combined and revised Open Space and Conservation Element that addresses the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources for the City of Tustin. Programs and plans are proposed that will conservate, maintain and assure the continued availability of land for the production of food and fiber, for the enjoyment of scenic beauty, for recreation, and for the use of natural resources. An environmental assessment of the Open Space and Conservation Element is included and referenced within the document. Presentation: Edward Knight, Associate Planner Planning Commissi~ July 23, 1984 page two Agenda 2. GENERAL PLAN. AMENDMENT NO. 84-3c - RECREATION ELEMENT A new optional element of the General Plan indicating a comprehensive system of areas and public sites for recreation. Programs are proposed that address the community-wide needs and requirements for recreational areas. An environmental assessment of the Recreation Element is included and referenced within the document. Presentation: Edward Knight, Associate Planner 3. USE PERMIT 84-12 Applicant: Garrison Management, Inc., on behalf of P.D.F. (a general partnership) Location: 1122-1192 Laguna Road Request: authorization to develop a 10,000 square foot automotive service center with a freeway identification sign Presentation: Alan Warren, Senior Planner AOHIMISTPJ~TIVE FAII'ERS A. Old Business None. B. New Business None. STAFF CONCERNS 1. Departmental Status Report Oral Presentation: Alan Warren, Senior Planner 2. Report on Council Actions - July 16, 1984 Oral Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development COI~ISSIO# CONCERNS AOJOURNME#T: To next regular meeting on August 13, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. PUBLIC I~ETING Report to the Planning Commission DATE: SUB,IECT: July 23, 1984 PUBLIC WORKSHOP/LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR IMPACTING ISSUANCE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSING DISCUSSION: As a result of concern expressed by an organization known as Parents Who Care, the City Council has directed that an analysis of land use regulations relating to the issuance of alcoholic beverage licenses be conducted. An important portion of this analysis is input and discussion from the public concerning this matter. Therefore, this public workshop has been agendtzed to maximize public participation. The Tustin Unified School District, Alcoholic Beverage Control, and the Crime Prevention division of the Police Department have been made aware of this workshop and invited to attend. Additionally, articles in The Register and The Tustin News were printed on July 17 and July 19 respectively. Survey information compiled by this department as well as a discussion of applicable State regulations will be covered at the workshop. However, as a brief overview it can be stated that the City has the authority, by use of zoning regulations, to restrict licenses issued by the State Alcoholic Beverage Control. These regulations must be incorporated into the City Zoning Ordinance and must then be uniformly applied City-wide. Specific standards as to distance requirements from schools, other establishments with liquor licenses, etc. can be included in any ordinance revision or amendment. RECOMHENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission receive public input and subsequently give staff direction as to what amendments, if any, should be drafted for inclusion in the City Zoning Ordinance. Assistant Planner JD:do , Community Development Department MINUl~S OF A REGULAR )I~ETING OF TIlE PLANNING COll~ISSION OF lllE CIl~ OF lllSTIN, CALIFORNIA July 9, 1984 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Ainslie and the Invocation was given by Commissioner Puckett. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: Also present: James Sharp, Chairman Ronald White, Chairman Pro Tem {arrived at 7:37 P.m.) Mark Ainslie' Charles Puckett Kathy Well None Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development Ed Knight, Associate Planner Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner Alan Warren, Senior Planner Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney MINIF£ES Moved by Commissioner Well, second by Puckett, to approve the minutes of the meeting of June 25, 1984. Motion carried 4-0, White absent. PUBLIC CO#CERMS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Final Tract Map No. 11649 1162 Sycamore - Barnett-Nowling, Partnership Moved by Puckett, seconded by Well, to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried, 4-0, White absent. Commissioner White arrived, 7:37 p.m. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-3b - OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN. A combined and revised Open Space and Conservation Element that · addresses the conservation, development and utilization of the natural resources for the City of Tustin. Programs and plans are proposed that will conservate, maintain and assure the continued availability of land for the production of food and fiber, for the enjoyment of scenic beauty, for recreation and for the use of natural resources. An environmental assessment of the Open Space and Conservation Element is included and referenced within the document. Donald D. Lamm presented staff's report and recommendation to continue as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated July 9, 1984. Chairman Sharp opened the hearing at 7:36 p.m.. Seeing no one wishing to speak, it was moved by Well, seconded by Puckett, to continue the hearing to the next regular meeting on July 23, 1984. Motion carried, 4-0 Planning Commission Minutes July 9, 1984 page two 2. 'GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-3c - RECREATION ELEMENT Shows a comprehensive system of areas and public sites for recreation. Programs are proposed that address the community-wide needs and requirements for recreational areas. An environmental assessment of the Recreation Element is included and referenced within the document. Donald D. Lamm presented staff's report and recommendation to continue as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated July 9, 1984. Chairman Sharp opened the hearing at 7:38 p.m.. Seeing no one wishing to speak, it was moved by Well, second by Puckett, to continue the hearing to the next regular meeting on July 23, 1984. Motion carried, 4-0. PUBLIC HF_~IM$S 1. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 84-2 - SATELLITE RECEIVING DISH/ANTENNA An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to include development standards for the locatiop and installation of Satellite Receiving Dish/Antenna. Donald D. Lamm presented staff's report and recommendation specifically to regulate or establish standards for the installation of satellite dish type antenna receiving facilities as contained in staff's report to the Planning Commission dated July g, 1984. Mr. Lamm responded to Commissioner Ainslie's question that the dish antenna had to have a clear line of sight to a southwesterly direction and cannot be blocked in any way by vegetation, buildings, etc. Commissioner Ainslie expressed concern that restricting residentials to ground level in backyards would rule out a lot of people in town. Mr. Lamm responded that two story homes with small backyards or trees would not get the line of sight necessary. Commissioner Well expressed concern for the neighbors of the backyards containing a dish antenna. Mr. Lamm explained the difficulty in this issue is that a large majority of homes in Tustin are two story and they would have clear view of a neighboring yard. Commissioner Weil continued with concern over the height of the dish not exceeding the height of the fence. Mr. Lamm pointed out that the diameter of the dish will more than likely be higher than the fence. If we require that they have to be obscured from the view of adjoining properties, we would eliminate about 95% in residential areas. Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. The following person expressed his interest in the aesthetics and skyline in Tustin: Thomas Shoemaker, 453 E. Camino Real, pointed out that we should consider requests on an individual basis due to the varying sizes of roof space on buildings. The screening on a small building being equivalent to a second story could be less attractive than the antenna alone. Don Lamm responded we would have individual control on requests. Since the Tustin Code does not address these antenna specifically, staff has determined that these antennas are roof .top mechanical devices which our code requires be co~letely screened from public view. In many cases, the screening could be as large as the ground floor of the building. The proposal before the Commission is a little more lenient. It states the antenna must be obscured, which could include a variety of screenings. It leaves the options wide open for the Commission consideration of the criteria applicable to each building's architecture. We are recommending stricter requirements for residential zones. We can require a Use Permit for the entire City and you can judge each request on its own merit. Planning Commission Minutes July 9, 1984 page three Chairman Sharp seeing no one else wishing to speak closed the public hearing at 7:53 and asked for discussion among the Commissioners. Commissioner White questioned if anyone wanting to erect a similar antenna would be subject to design review by the Commission or the staff. Don Lamm responded that they would be subject to staff design review which have m~nimal standards that can be imposed. Under the proposed new code it would be reviewed under a Use Permit by the Commission. Commissioner Ainslie expressed his concern that by imposing too many conditions and restrictions on installation of dish antennas, we would eliminate about 95% of the people who would like an option to Communicom; thus creating a monopoly by Communicom. He agrees we need a building permit to insure proper anchoring, does not agree we need a Conditional Use Permit for antenna, does not see the need for them to be on ground level in residential zones as long as-they are obscured from public right of way. He felt it should remain at staff level with guidelines for screening and if an appeal was necessary they could appeal to the Commission for a variance. Commissioner Well felt we should maintain control over the installation until the industry stabilizes. She was concerned with the visual t~act upon the surrounding neighbors. Commissioner Ainslie pointed out that if there was a protest we'would hold a hearing; without a protest there is no hearing. Well felt people did not understand the system enough to know they could coma to City Hall to protest. Chairman Sharp summarized it as a classic problem of protecting the' individual rights or the rights of the group. Ainslie felt the additional $250 charge for a public hearing would in~ose a greater hardship on citizens. After two unsuccessful motions, Commissioner White m°ved, Well seconded that Zoning Ordinance Amendment 84-2 be recommended for adoption and that Item 5, underground wiring, be deleted with the provision that the wiring of the antenna simply be screened from view and that reference to satellite receiving dish antennas amended to"any dish antenna exceeding 4 feet in diameter." 4-1 vote (Ainslie opposed) 2. ZONE CHANGE 84-3 Applicant: Location: Request: Barry Watkins on behalf of Tustin Properties northeasterly corner of Seventeenth Street and Carroll Way authorization to change the zone from C-1 Retail Commercial to Commercial General (CG-PUD) Jeff Davis presented staff's report and recommendations as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated July g, 1984. Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing at 8:36 p.m. The following person spoke in favor of the zone change: D. Barrett Watkins, managing partner of Tustin Properties, explained that they would like to re-do the center, upgrade it substantially, add additional building areas, provide for outside seating and outside display areas similar to a Conroy's Florist. Their hope is to maximize the available retail sales from the property and to build a very quality product. Don Lamm explained that Mr. Watkins will be back at a future Planning Commission meeting with his Use Permit application and full presentation of the project. Planning Commission Minutes July g, 1984 page four The following person spoke in favor of Zone Change 84-3: Robert Ebert, 13832 Fairmont Way, explained that his property is behind the proposed shopping center. He directed a question to Don Lamm: He wondered i.f now or the next hearing would be'the appropriate time to comment on certain changes regarding the physical attributes of the project. Don Camm responded that tonight the Commission should be considering whether or not to change the zoning of the property. Mr. Ebert continued his comment in regard to the zone change. He explained that his interest is the 165 feet of the back line of his property. He feels it would impact him, his family and his property value. He favors what Mr. Watkins has proposed and thinks it would be a good change for the center with specific changes in regard to the building. 'Commissioner Sharp seeing no one else wishing to speak closed the public hearing at 8:58 p.m. and opened the meeting up for Commission discussion. Moved by Well and second by White to approve the adoption of Zone Change 84-3. Motion carried 5-0. Applicant: Locati on: Request: USE PERMIT 84-12 Garrison Management, Inc., on behalf of P.P.F. (a general partnership) 1122-1192 Laguna Road authorization to develop a 10,000 square foot automotive service center with a freeway identification sign. Alan Warren presented staff's report and recommendations as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated July g, 1984. Chairman Sharp asked if we received any response to the advertised public hearing. Mr. Warren replied we did not. Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing at 9:08. The following person spoke in favor of Use Permit 84-12: Steve Garrison, the applicant, expressed his appreciation to staff for their sensitivity to the parking impact upon the neighbors. He explained their analysis of reducing the square footage: the cost would be reduced but also the income of the property would be reduced. If they had to go two spaces per bay, the project would not be economically feasible. He suggested that the Commission look at the project's ability to enhance the street, the lack of automotive repair in Tustin, and there would be significant sales tax revenue. He also stated that in their initial analysis they looked at five spaces per . 1,000 as a proper ratio for the office areas and two spaces per 1,000 for the warehouse/industrial segments of the building; on that basis 24 parking spaces would be adequate. They are providing 29 spaces. He also explained that perhaps the employees could tandem park. If they tandem park they could probably park another four to five cars. On that basis they would have 3.7 cars per 1,O00. Relating to the signs, he considers the monument sign in front to be an identification sign and would be willing to compromise to retain the pylon sign which he feels has important commercial value. Chairman Sharp questioned if the project would be viable if the City decided to restrict the parking on the south side of Laguna Road. Mr. Garrison explained that he understands it is already posted no parking. He has met with the Principal and Assistant Principal of Tustin High and they did not express any opposition to the project. Planning Commission Minutes July 9, 1984 page fi ye The following person spoke in favor of Use Permit 84-12: Charles Noble, of Lee & Associates, will be handling the marketing of the project. He added that in'talking with managers of similar projects you cannot have an employee per bay. A mechanic may be working on a car in one bay, and at the same time called to another project. They do not have actual leases at this time, but do have letters of commitment on the westerly building. The following person spoke in favor of Use Permit 84-12: Barry Watkins, friend of Steve Garrison, shared his experience with Dorman and Kragen Automotive. The other cities allowed the bays to' counted for parking since the car parks outside for a short time until it can be worked on inside the bay. The following person spoke in favor of Use Permit 84-12: Dan Pettey, owner of the property, explained that he has attempted to develop the property numerous times but has been turned down for uses that were approved under the zone. It has gotten to the point where it is almost inverse condemnation of the property. He is concerned that if they have to cut down on the size of the project, the project would not be feasible. It has gotten to the point where either we need to develop the property now or condemn it. The following person commented on Use Permit 84-12: Gil Kveen, Jr., son of property owner at Jill Laguna Road. He was involved in auto repair for six years and explained that he felt parking would be a real problem. He experiences parking problems everytime there is a football game or other school activity. There are nine repair centers within a three block radius of this proposed location plus one truck repair facility. He also felt traffic would be a problem. Car repair shops will need to take the cars out and test drive them. He felt it was not only dangerous from a traffic standpoint, but also from the kids crossing the street from school. He questioned if this project would eliminate the pre-school and veterinary office. Mr. Warren responded the pre-school would be eliminated but the veterinary hospital would remain. Chairman Sharp, seeing no one else wishing to speak, closed the public hearing at 9:30 p.m. and asked for discussion from Commission. Mr. Lamm commented that staff is particularly favorable of this project. However, based on his experience with a Cypress project, he feels the parking would be inadequate. Mr. Lamm also commented that the city is not trying to inversely condemn this property. Chairman Sharp felt the developer would have more to lose. than the city if the parking were not adequate. He also would' be interested in incorporating the CC&R's as a part of the Use Permit. After further Commission discussion Commissioner White moved, second by Ainslie to continue to next regular meeting on July 23rd and directing project applicant to meet with Staff to resolve parking problem, 5-0 vote. MATTERS A. Old Business ~one Planning Commission Minutes July 9, 1984 page six B. New Business 1. Large FamilyDay Care Home Permit 14692 Cheshire Place Jeff Davis presented staff's report and recommendation as contained in the staff report dated July g, 1984. Commission requested public input in favor or opposing their day care permit for which there was neither. Staff indicated only one anonymous phone call in opposition but refused to formerly protest. Following discussion by the Commission, Well moved and White seconded to grant the permit, 5-0 vote. 2. Relief from Compliance with Condition I. of Variance 83-1. Don Lamm presented staff's report and recommendation as contained in the Report to the Planning Cpmmission dated July 9, 1984. A general discussion followed regarding the viability of using Suite 183 as retail and the overall appearance of the project. It was moved by Commissioner White and second by Puckett to waive the condition of original approval for retail space as recommended by staff, 5-0 vote. STAFF CONCERNS 1. Report on Council Actions - July 2, L984 Don Lamm summarized the past City Council agenda. CO~ISSIO# CONCERNS None. ADdOUR~#T Meeting was adjourned to 6:30 p.m. on July 23, 1984 for a public meeting to discuss possible changes to the zoning ordinance concerning alcoholic beverage licensing. JAMES B. SHARP, Chairman Prepared by Donna Orr, Recording Secretary eport to Planning Commission DATE: ~uly 23, 1984 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AP, ENDHENTS 84-3b A#D 84-3c OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELF_RENT RECREATION ELEMENT CONT. PUB. HRGS NO. 1 & 2 DISCUSSION: At the last Planning Commission meeting, staff recommended these public hearings be continued at the request of The Irvine Company to permit them ample opportunity to review the proposed elements and submit their comments. Staff has received Irvine Company comments and met with their staff on several occasions. The major objection submitted by The Irvine Company is the potential conflict with concurrent processing of the East Tustin Specific Plan and General Plan Elements. The Irvine Company prefers that the specific plan process proceed to a preferred alternative which could then be tested against the new elements at a future date. The City wishing to cooperate, but not compromise our position, has agreed to withdraw these two elements with the understanding they will be presented to a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council on Monday, September 10, 1984. The joint public hearing will then permit a full presentation to both the Commission and Council. RECOF~ENDATION: That both public hearings be closed and the elements withdrawn until they are readvertiised for hearing at a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council on September 10, 1984. ~)N~LD D. LAMM,~ Director of Community Development DDL:do Community Development Department Report to the Planning Commiss ©n CONT.PUBLIC HEARING NO. ~ DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: OWNER: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL: 0uly 23, 1984 USE PER,qlT 84-12 GARRISON MRNAGEJ~ENT, INC. 161 F~HIOM LAME, #116 TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 1122-1192 LAGUNA ROAD P.D.F. (A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP) 1602 NORTH GRAND AVENUE SANTA &JLA, CA. 92701 RETAIL COMMERCIAL (C-l), APPLICATION UNDER COMMERCIAL GENERAL - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN ANTICIPATION OF APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE 84-2. REQUEST FOR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: On the July 9, 1983 the Planning Commission voted to continue this public hearing to give the applicant an opportunity to work towards a resolution of the staff concerns relatin9 to parking accomodations. The applicant has submitted a detailed analysis of other auto repair centers and planning staff has completed a review of repair businesses within the City. The applicant has not, as of the date of this report's preparation, completed a revised site plan for consideration by staff and the Commission. As a result, the applicant has requested a continuance to the next Planning Commission meeting. The applicant has stated this extra time will allow him to finalize a site plan which will attempt to incorporate sufficient parking accomodations to satisfy the Planning Commission concerns. REC0Pl4ENOED ACTION: Continue the Public Hearing to the August 13, 1984 meeting. ~J'AL~AN WARREN, Senior Planner AW:do Community Development Department Report to the Planning commission STAFF CONCERNS !i0. 1 ~uly 23, 1984 DEPARTIqE~TAL PROdECT STATUS - J~.EK OF dULY 16, 1984 This report is intended 'co inform the Council and Commission of Csmmunity Development Department projects and their processing o~ construction status. Should any member of · the Council or Commission desire further information, please contact me at your convenience. Preliminar~ site plans have been submitted for the following: A. 20 unit senior citizen complex proposed for the properties at 17432 and 17442 Mitchell Avenue. B. A 26,000 sq. ft. corporate headquarters building for H¥com at 15151Woodlawn in the Specific Plan No. ? area. 2. A public hearing application has been submitted for the Tustin Copmmunity Hospital site for a 4?,000 sq. ft. medical office at 14660 Newport Avenue. 3. The following projects have been submitted for first plan check: A. A 6,800 sq. ft. retail building for the northwesterly corner of McFadden and Newport. B. Birtcher Pacific project of 85,000 sq. ft. of Research and Development to be located at the northwesterly corner of Red Hill and Bell Avenues a business/industrial area. C. 30,000 sq. ft. of office addition to Steelcase at 1123 Warner. A parking lot permit has been issued to ensure that adequate parking facilities are available for employees when building constructionn commences. 4. The following projects will be obtaining their building permits in the near future. A. 13 unit townhome project at 1042-62 Walnut St. community Development Department Department status July 23, 1984 page two 1252-62 1trine Boulevard medical/general office to be known as La Jolla P1 aza. C. An 84,000 sq. ft. research and development building at 2841 Dow Avenue. Respectfully submitted, Senior Planner AW:do Community Development Department Planning Commission JULY 23, 1984 SUBJECT: Report on Counct1 Acttons- ~luly 16, 1984 Oral presentation to be given by Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development do Attachments: City Council Action Agenda - July 16, 1984 Community Development Department ACTION AGENDA OF A ~GULAR ~EETING OF Tile TOSTIN CITY COUNCIL July 16, 1984 7:00 P.M. 7:00 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION EDGAR-PLED6E/SALTARELLI -IIlVOCATION I I. ROLL CALL HOESTEREY ABSENT PROCLAMATION PRESENTED TO KATHY SI(IVES, OLYMPIC TORCH BEARER NONE III. PUBLIC INPUT IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUED 1. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF USE PERMIT 84-8 - GEORGETOWN MANOR TO 8-6-84 FOR APARTMENTS, 13181-13195 GWYNETH DRIVE ALL PARTIES TO I~ET Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council. TO TRY TO R~SOLVE DIFFERENCES CONTINUED 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENOMENT NO. 84-38 - OPEN SPACE & CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF ~q 8-6-84 THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN Recommendation: Continue. the public hearlng and consideration of General Plan Amendment No. 84-3b to August $, 1984, as recommended by the Community Oevelopment Department. CONTINUEO 3. GENERAL PLAN AMENOMENT'NO. 84-3C - RECREATION ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA TO 8-6-84 GENERAL PLAN Recommendation: Continue the public hearing and consideration of General Plan Amendment No. 8¢-3c to August 6, 1984, as recommended by the C~,,~nity Development Department. ® CONTINUED TO 8-6-84 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-30 RESOLUTION NO. 84-52 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENOING THE LANO USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE-FAMILY RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1262 BRYAN AVENUE Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Counctl. 5. GENERAL PLAN AMENOMENT NO. 84-2 ADOPTED & RESOLUTION NO. 84-55 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIRECTEO STAFF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO TO INITIA~ COMMERCIAL FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS 14462 RED HILL AVENUE AND SHOWN AS ZONE Ci4ANGE EXHIBIT "A" ENCLOSED PROCESS TO CG-PUO Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 84-B5, as recommended by the Planning Commission. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 1 7-16-84 ORD. J915 6. ""T AOOPTED; )PORTED CON- TINUATION OF STUDY m ADOPTED EXTENSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE MORATORIUM - ORDINANCE NO. 915 - AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, EXTEND- ING THE MORATORIUM UPON THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR OFF-SALE LIQUOR STORES IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN Reconm~ndation: 1) That Ordinance No. 915 have first reading by title only and introduction; and 2) That Ordinance No. 915 have second reading by title only and adoption. (Roll Call Vote) FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 BUDGET & REVENUE SHARING APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION NO. 84-57 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING THE CITY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 AOOPTED VD RESOLUTION NO. 84-58 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING THE REVENUE SHARING FUND BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVE- NUE OF THE FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution Nos. 84-57 and 84-58. CONSENT CALENDAR APPROVED 1. APPROVED 2. XI'HORIZED 3. AUTHORIZED 4. AUll~)RIZEO 5. AUll(ORIZEO 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 2, 1984, REGULAR MEETING JULY g, 1984, BUOGET WORKSHOP RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $277,196.03 APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE mOUNT OF $117,095.20 REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING DURING STREET SWEEPING OPERATIONS - MARSHALL LANE BETWEEN FAIRHAVEN & SANTA CLARA AVENUES Authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-street parking during street sweeping hours, $:00 a.m. to noon on Wednesday on both sides of Marshall Lane between Fair haven Avenue and Santa Clara Avenue and that warnings be issued in lieu of citations for the first 30 days after sign installation, as reconmended by the Direc- tor of Public Works. SAN DIEGO PIPELINE CO. V. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL., COMPLAINT FOR REFUND OF PROPERTY TAX, LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. C$02532, CLJklM NO. 84-18 Authorize the County Counsel of the County of Orange to defend the City of Tustin in the above-referenced action pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 5149. REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL, 1892 SANDWOOD PLACE Authorize the removal of three street trees at 1892 Sandwood Place per Case I of current City Policy and replace two trees along the Cloverbrook Drive frontage with two 1S-gallon size Magnolia trees, as recon~nended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL, 13301 CROMWELL DRIVE Authorize the removal of two street trees at 13301 Cromwell Drive per Case I of current City Policy and replace with one 15-gallon size Magnolia tree, as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 2 7-16-84 APPROVED '7. ADOPTED 8. ADOPTED 9. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN TRACT NO. 11649 (Barnett- Nowling Company, 1162 Sycamore Avenue} Accept all public improvements constructed by the developers of Tract No. 11649 as recon~nended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 84-56 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-3 (Ri'verford Road) Adopt Resolution No. 84-56 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 84-46 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE APPLICATION OF THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT TO THE PROPOSED GYLAH-WARREN ANNEXATION NO. 134 Adopt Resolution No. 84-46, as recommended by the Community Develop- merit Department. RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 9:22 PI~ FOR DISCUSSION (~ LEGAL MRTTERS; RECONVENED AT ~I:3A PM, HOESTEREY ABSENT VI. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION CONTINUED TO 8-6-84 ORDINANCE NO. 914 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON LAGUNA ROAD (ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 401-064-01 AND 401-064-02) FROM THE RETAIL COMMERCIAL (C-1} DISTRICT TO THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CG- PUD) DISTRICT M.O. - That Ordinance No. 914 have second reading by title only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 914 be passed and adopted. {Roll Call Vote}- VII. OLD BUSINESS A-oPROVEO 1. FOSTER ART SERVICE/BOYS CLUB OF TUSTIN AGREEMENT AGREEMENT & A verbal report will be given at the City Council meeting. AUTHORIZED ITS EXECUTION BY RAYOR/CUERK S~ INTER- 2. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COt~MISSION MEMBERS VIEWS ON 7-30-84 Recommendation: Set a City Council meeting date for interview of AT 7:00 PM & potential candidates and instruct staff to notify final candidates ACCEPTED LETIT. R of same. FROM APPLICANT ALICIA EPPINGER VIII. NEW BUSINESS AWARDED 1. AS RECOI~NDED AWARD OF CONTRACT - FISCAL YEAR 1983-84 SIDEWALK & CURB REPAIR PROGRAM Recommendation: Award the contract for subject project to Harper Construction Company in the amount of $52,002.78; and authorize the Finance Department to transfer funds from Account 2915, Street and Alley Repair, to subject project account in order to cover the shortfall in funding for this project, as recommended by the Engineering Division. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 7-16-84 AUTHORI~D 2. NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/STATEMENT FOR w~DDITIOll OF SANTA AMA FREEWAY (I-5} JiGRAPfl INDI- Recommendation: Authorize staff, to respond to CalTrans on the EATING CONCERN OVER notice of preparation of the draft Environmental I~act Report/ MODIFICATION OF Statement as outlined in the letter dated July 16, 1984, as RE1)HILL & NEWPORT recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. IX. REPORTS RATIFIED 1. RECEIVED & 2. FILED RECEIVED & FILED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - JULY 9, 1984 Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council. All actions of the Planning Commission are final unless appealed by the City Council. IRVINE BOULEVARD FROM RANCHWOOO ROAD TO CULVER DRIVE, AND FROM JEFFREY ROAD TO SAND CANYON AVENUE Recommendation: Receive and file. 3. COLUMBUS TUSTIN WELL PROJECT STATUS REPORT 'Recommendation: Receive and file. OTHER BUSINESS CITY MGR. REQUESTED CLO~ED ~ES$ION FOR DISCUSSION OF LEGAl. 14A'FI'EP.$ AGENDIZED APPOINTI~NT TO O.C. NOISE ASATENENT CO~ISSION FOR 8-6-84 I~[ETING; COUNCIL TO REVIEW RESb~IE OF &AMES PI.F.~ET'Z STAFF TO CLARIFY OLY~IPIC TORCH PROCESSION ROUTE ,EINKE SU66ESTED FOl~ltl OF ~ULY FIREWORIG S~ECTACULAR INCLUDE HOT DOGS; MORE PATRIOTIC MUSIC; AND POSSIBLY VIDEO TAPING PR06i~I FOR VIEWING BY SENIOR CITIZENS 10:lO XI. ADJOURNMENT - To an Adjourned Regular Meeting on July BO, lgO4, at 7:00 p.m. for Planning Commission interviews; and then to the next regular meeting on August $. 1984, at 7:00 p.m. 10:10 1. HOESTEREY 2. ABSENT 3. ~OPTED A~'rlON AGENDA OF A REGULAR I~[EI'ING OF THE TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY July 16, 1984 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. RDA 84-8 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTING THE AGENCY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE AGENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 APPROVED 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 2, 1984 5. OTHER BUSINESS GREINKE REPORTED SETTLING OF SIDEWALK ~XT TO CItANGER OF COI~ERCE & IN SI'RUCTt~E; Cll~ MGR. INDICATED REPDRT IS IN PROCESS 10:13 6. ADJOURNMENT - To the next regular meeting on August 6, 1984. PARKING CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 4 7-16-84