Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 07-16-84MINUTES OF A PJ~GULAR ~ETING OF ll(E CITY Cou)mcIL OF ll(E. CITY OF ll)STIN, ~!FORNIA JULY 2, 1984 ! II. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Saltarelli, and the Invocation was given by Councilman Greinke. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: III. PUBLIC I~PUT Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Donald J. Saltarelli None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Eva A'. Solis, Deputy City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. White, Dir. of Admin. & Com. Srvcs. Monda Buckley, Administrative Assistant Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Approximately 25 in the audience IV. None. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. GENERAL PLAN MENDIwENT NO. 84-3A - HOUSING ELEMENT OF lllE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN - RESOLUTION NO. 84-49 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated July 2, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Kennedy opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. There being no speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. ~-J)g - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE REVISED HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN Motion carried 5-0. 56 Councilman Edgar noted that Tustin is one of the first Orange County cities to have an updated Housing Element. Mayor Kennedy responded to Councilman Hoesterey that a City Council letter of thanks has been sent to members of the Citizens Advisory Committee for their work on the draft element. The Community Development Director recognized committee members by name and organization. 2. GENERAL PLAN AFIENDI~ENT NO. 84-3B - OPEN SPACE & CONSERVATION ELE- ME~ OF ll~E llISTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated July 2, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened at 7:07 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 7-2-84 It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by open public hearing and consideration of No. 84-3b to July 16, 1984. Carried 5-0. Edgar, to continue the General Plan Amendment GENERAL PLAN ,N4ENIW~IENT NO. 84-3C - RECREATION ELEMENT OF THE T1JSTIN AREA GENERA). PLAN The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 2, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened at 7:08 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter. It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, the open public heamng and consideration of General No. 84-3c to July 16, 1984. Motion carried 5-0. to continue an Amendment 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENOMENT NO. 84-30 - RESOLUTION NO. 84-52 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated July 2, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department, and responded to Council concerns relative to density and specific use control. Mayor Kennedy opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Emanuel Aftergut, applicant representative, noted that the property is in the Redevelopment Project Area, and described the proposed retirement home for the elderly, whose main feature is a common dining room where meals will be served, in addition to daily house- keeping, and a variety of services geared to the elderly and man- aged by an experienced administrator in geriatric practices. There being no other speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed at 7:29 p.m. Council/staff discussion followed regarding protecting the zone designation to prohibit any multi-family development other than a senior housing facility. In response to Council, the City Attorney stated that unless Council wants to consider having an entirely new zone created, then the only option is to designate it PD, but Coun- cil could create a complete new zone limited to a specifically described type of senior housing. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to consideration of'General Plan Amendment No. 84-3d and'lthe resolution: continue following RESOLUTION NO. 84-52 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE-FAMILY RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1262 BRYAN AVENUE After further discussion, the motion carried 5-0. 5. ZONE OIANGE NO. 84-2 - 1122-1192 LAGUNA ROAD - ORDINANCE NO. 914 The staff report and recommendation was 'presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 2, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Kennedy opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. The following person spoke in favor of Zone Change No. 84-2: Steve Garrison, applicant representative. There being no other speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 914 have first reading by title only. · CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 7-2-84 Councilman Saltarelli stated his satisfaction with the present zoning (C-1) and did not see sufficient staff justification to change from same. Mayor Kennedy stated her opposition to the zone change. After further discussion, the motion carried 5-0. Following fTrst reading by title only of Ordinance No. 914 by the Deputy City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 914 be introduced as follows: ORDINAJiCE NO. 914 -AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON LAGUNA ROAD (ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 401-064-01 AND 401-064-02) FRObl THE RETAIL COMMERCIAL (C-1) DISTRICT TO THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CG-PUD) DISTRICT The motion carried 3-2, Kennedy and Saltarelli opposed. 6.' 1984-~ PI~ELIMINARY BUDGET & 7. 110 ~LOCATION OF 1984-85 REVENUE SHARING FUNDS The City Manager presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in his inter-com dated June ~7, 1984. The public hearing was opened at 7:57 p.m. by Mayor Kennedy. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to continue the public hearings to a workshop on July g,'19~4, ~t 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room. Carried 5-0. (See Other Business, Item 8, Page 7, for further action on this item.) 29 AGENDA ORDER PUBLIC INPUT TUSTIN TILLER DAYS Cherrill Webb, Tustin Tiller Days Committee Chairperson, displayed the new logo for Tustin Tiller Days which was designed by City staff. Ms. Webb reported that the Committee has requested $3,000 from Coors for financial assistance with the entertainment budget, and they will be notified of a decision on July 3. In addition, Ms. Webb reported that contests are planned for the 1984 event, and requested that Council provide judging assistance if called upon. 34 CONSENT CALENDAR Items 1 and 9 were removed from the Consent Calendar by Greinke, and Item 10 by Kennedy. It was then moved by Edgar~ seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $112,761.39 APPROV~ OF I]F. lqANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $886,742.03 5O lllE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE ~ILWAY COMPANY, ET AL. V. BDARD OF EQUALIZATION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.; USDC NO.. DIST. MASTER CONSOLIDATED CASE ti0. C 81 4365 SW Authorized the County Counsel of the County of Orange to defend the City of Tustin in the subject action pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 5149 as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 4. RESOLUTION NO. 84-51 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF CATV FRANCHISE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS Adopted Resolution No. 84-51 as directed by the City Council. 53 5. REJECTION OF CLAIM OF GLENN ROBERT BALDWIN; DATE OF LOSS: 2-15-84; DATE FILED: 5-25-84; CLJ~IM NO.: 8~-10 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 7-2-84 REJECTION OF CLAIM OF ~RISTIE FILLIPPINI; DATE OF LOSS: 3-15-84; DATE FI)ED: $-29-84; CLAIM NO.: 84-11 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 e RESOLUTION NO. 84-50 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING LOIS E. JEFFREY AS DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY. Adopted Resolution No. 84-50 as recommended by the City Attor- ney. 79 8. S.B. 8Z1 BICYCLE/PEDES-rRIAJl FACILITIES PROJECT APPLICATION Approved subject application for S.B. 821 funds to construct a sidewalk along the northerly side of McFadden Avenue from 200+ feet easterly of Tustln Village Way to Pasadena Avenue aY directed by the City Council. 86 11. RESOLUTION NO. 84-48 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITYCOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO.. 83-1026 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SIXTH STREET AND "B" STREET Adopted Resolution No. 84-48 as recommended by the Community Development Department. gg Consent Calendar Item N~. 1 - Mtnute~ of June 18, 1984 - Councilman Greinke made a correction to Page 5, Item 4, Paragraph 2) to read as follows: "2) Direct staff to review a citY-wide entryway sign plan, including relocation of existing signs, not necessarily tied to the wishing well design." It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to approve the follow- ing with the correction noted above: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1984 The motion carried 5-0. Consent Calendar Item No. 9 - 1984-85 Fire Contract - Councilman G~einke stated subject item was removed from Consent Calendar for emphasis and as a reminder that the cost for fire services has escala- ted drastically and that options for fire protection service should be reviewed and decided upon very rapidly. It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to approve the following: 1984-85 FIRE CONI~ Approve subject agreement between the City and the County of Orange for fire suppression, prevention and paramedic services through June 30, 1985, subject to the City and County reaching an agreement on the rental rate for Fire Station No. 2 as recommended by the City Manager. Following discussion regarding the rental rate, the motion carried 5-0. 84-2g Consent Calendar Item No. 10 - Tustin Boys Club & Foster Art Service Agreement - Mayor Kennedy expressed concern that the City may suffer a loss under the new agreeement. The City Manager explained that the intent of the agreement is to reimburse the Boys Club ($20,000) for the loss of what was to have been provided under the original agreement, i.e., the basketball court. The City would still retain access across the lot for any water well site constructed in the future. Councilman Saltarelli stated concern that the original three-party agreement was never fully met and questioned its validity. He requested staff investigate the original agreement's validity, and whether the City should regain title to the property and refund all monies paid by Foster Art Service. He wondered if not doing so would CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 7-2-84 constitute a gift of public funds, since the property was sold at below-market value on the basis that there would be public benefit to the Boys Club, which is now not going to occur. Mayor Kennedy stated that she was concerned at the time of the original agreement, but because the Boys Club was to benefit directly, she voted approval. However, she reminded Council the parcel was appraised for $67,500 and that conditions have changed drastically since Mr. Foster's death. The City Manager indicated staff would review the matter. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, to continue the following item for further re~iew by legal staff: 10. AGREE)lENT BETWEEN BOYS CLUB OF TUSTIN AND FOSTER ART SERVICE Approved subject agreement as suggested by the City Manager. Motion carried 5-0. 45 84-30 VI. ORDINANCES FOR I~ll~ODUCTIO# See Public Hearing No. 5, Page 2 and 3. VII. O~DINANCES FOR ADOPTION None. VIII. OLD 1. BUSINESS STATUS REPORT ON ALCOI~)LIC BEVEIU~ LICEMSE ~ATORIUH The Community Development Director presented the status report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated July 2, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt subject report justifying the need to extend the subject moratorium and set a public hearing on July 16, 1984, to adopt a resolution extending the subject moratorium for an additional four months from July 19, 1984. Councilman Greinke. expressed his opposition to the motion. The motion carried 4-1, Greinke opposed. 81 IX. NEW 1. BUSINESS - WALK-ON ITEM HISTORICAL DESIGNATION - RALPH RESIDENCE, 1252 IRVINE BOULEVARD - RESOLUTION NO. 84-54 The staff report and recommendation was presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-eom dated July 2, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 84-54 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ESTABLISHING THE RALPH RESIDENCE, 1252 IRVINE BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORIC BUILDING The Community Development Director responded to Councilman Salta- relli's concern that the historic building designation grants a degree of special privilege by not requiring strict compliance to Uniform Building Code standards. The Director stated that wherever alternative methods can be implemented to meet normal safety stan- dards they are still required, and this will only be the third structure in Tustin to be designated "historic." The motion carried 5,0. 30 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 7-2-84 X. REPORTS XI. 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - JUNE 25, 1984 It was moved .by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to ratify the June 25, 1984, Planning Commission Action Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 80 2. COLUI~US TUSTIN WELL PROJECT STATUS REPORT The Administrative Assistant reported that the contracts have been received, and Stang Hydronics plans to set in place all necessary equipment on July 3, with an estimated start date of July 9, 1984. Councilman Edgar stated he expects a status report for the.July 16 Council meeting. 107 3. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS Mayor Kennedy expressed her delight with the number of applications received thus far. The schedule contained in the July 2, 1984, inter-com prepared by the Community Development Department was acceptable to Council, and there was unanimous informal consent to approve it as follows: July 9, 1984 Deadline for submittal of letters of interest and qualifications July 16, 1984 - Summary report to Council forwarding applications July 30, 1984 - Conduct an adjourned regular meeting for the pur- pose of publicly interviewing candidates 80 4. REVIEW OF POLITICAL SIGN ORDINANCE REGULATIONS The Community Development Director presented the staff report as contained in the inter-com dated July 2, 1984, prepared by the Com- munity Development Department. Council discussion followed on political sign regulations. Areas of concern included devising a means of controlling sign vandalism, increasing the required bond amount, expanding political sign con- trol to other than just municipal elections, limiting sign dimen- sions in commercial districts, implementing an escalating fine system for each sign that must be removed by City staff, and destroying illegal signs that are removed prior to the election by City staff. There was Council consensus that the matter be referred back to staff for further review of ~ouncil concerns. 93 OTHER BUSINESS OLYMPIC TORCH PROCESSION THROUGH TOSTIN Councilman Saltarelli issued a reminder to all that the Olympic Torch will pass through the City on July 26, and he encouraged residents and businesses to observe the event. Council concurred with Councilman Greinke that a proclamation be presented to runners who will carry the Olympic Torch through Tustin. 84 2. COMPLIMENT ON BUDGET PREPARATION Councilman Saltarelli complimented staff on the excellent format in budget preparation. 3. STATE LEAGUE TRANSPORTATION I~EETING Councilman Greinke reported on matters discussed at the League State Transportation meeting which he attended in Oakland on June 29. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION Councilman Greinke requested a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 7-2-84 llIo APPOINTHENT OF VOTING DELEGATE & ALTERNATE FOR LEAGUE ANNUAL CON- FERENCE In accordance with Councilman Edgar's request, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to appoint Councilman Frank H. Greinke as Voting Delegate and 'Councilman Richard B. Edgar as Alternate for the September, 1984, League Annual Conference to be held in Anaheim. Carried 5-0. 73 6, I-5 SANTA ~ FREEWAY MODIFICATIONS Councilman Edgar reported that specific information will be forth- coming to Tustin officials regarding modifications to the 1,5 Santa Aha Freeway. 7. REAFFIRRATION OF TUSTIN SPHERE OF INFLUENCE Councilman Edgar expressed awareness of pressure by the Santiago Municipal Advisory Council (SMAC) to modify Tustin's sphere of influence. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to reaffirm Tustin's sphere of influence as being in compliance with State law and that there is no intention of modifying same. The motion carried 4-0, Saltarelli abstaining. 24 8. FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 BUBGET Councilman Edgar also complimented staff on budget preparation, noting that there is greater visibility which allows for more care- ful analysis. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize operat- ing expenditures at the Fiscal Year 1983-84 level, with the excep- tion of carry-over capital improvements. Carried 5-0. ~g g. PARK & CIVIC CENTER BOND REDEMPTION The Finance Director responded to questions by Councilman Edgar pertaining to the Park and Civic Center Bond Redemption Options. The City Manager indicated staff will report to the City Council when a transaction occurs. 10. FLOOD CONTROL CItANNEL ON ANGLIN DRIVE Councilman Hoesterey requested staff investigate the letter from a resident on Anglin Drive regarding the County flood control chan- nel behind their home. RECESS - REDEVELOPHENT - CLOSED SESSION; ADdOURNI~NT At 8:54 p.m., it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session for dis- cussion of legal matters; and thence adjourn to a budget workshop on July 9, 1984, at 4:00 p.m., and thence to the next regular meeting on July 16, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0. MAYOR MXNUTES OF A REGULAR I~EETING OF ll4E REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JULY 2, 1984 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Kennedy at 8:54 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. ROLL CALL Agency Members Present: Agency Me~ers Absent: Others Present: Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson Frank H. Greinke, Chairperson Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Donald J. Saltarelli None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager Eva A. Solis, Recording Secretary/Dep. City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Monda Buckley, Administrative Assistant Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Royleen A. White, Dir. of Admin. & Com. Srvcs. Approximately 15 in the audience 3. APPROVAL OF MXNUTES It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Greinke, to approve the minutes of the June l~, 1984, meeting. The motion carried 5-0. 4. APPROVAL OF ~EMANDS It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli,, to approve demands in the amount of ~27,5§4.48 for the month of May, 198,, as recommended by the Finance Director. Motion carried 5-0. 81 5. FY 1984-85 BUOGET It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded abtY Saltarelli, to authorize Redevelop- ment Agency operating expenditures t~e Fiscal Year 1983-84 level, with the exception of carry-over capital improvements. Carried 5-0. Lx3 ADJOURNMENT At 8:55 p.m., it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adjourn to the next regular ~eeting on July 16, 1984. Carried 5-0. MINu~ES- OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JULY 9, 1984. .NG II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Greinke at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room, 300 Centennial Way. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Donald J. Saltarelli Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor William A. Huston, City Manager Eva A. Solis, Deputy City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dtr. of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. White, Dir. of Admin. & Com. Srvcs. Monda Buckley, Admi ni strati ye Assistant Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director III. BUDGET WORKSHOP The Director of Public Works provided an overview of his departmental budget and responded to Council questions. Following further discussion regarding the preliminary budget, the Council directed staff to prepare a resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 1984-85 budget with the addition of the following General Fund appro- priations: SCAG membership ($438.00 per year) Traffic signal at Cherrywood and Walnut ($58,500) Andrews/Utt/Green Valley Storm Drain {$160,000) Major Street Maintenance {$70,000) IV. A~JOOR~IEI~r The workshop session was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent to the next regular meeting on July 16, 1984, at 7:00 p.m.