HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 4 G.P. AMEND 84-3D 07-16-84Inter-Corn
FRQH:
SIJ~JECT:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
COI~IUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTtlENT
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF GENERAL PLAN Nq£NDI~NT 84-3d
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
lqANNY AFTERGUT ON BEHALF OF GOLDRICH, KEST & ASSOCIATES
AIqEND THE GENERAL PLAN FROI! SINGLE-FAfIILY RESIDENTIAL TO
8ULT[-FAIqILY RESIDENTIAL.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council at its last meeting on July 2, 1984 continued consideration of
the subject General Plan Amendment and requested staff to investigate
regulations assuring that the subject property would, be developed into a seni.or
citizen board and care home. The Council was concerned that amending the
property's General Plan land use designation from single-family to multi-family
residential without restricting the type of housing product could result in
apartments, condominiums or townhomes being constructed should the senior
citizen project fail to materialize.
Staff believes that the merits of a General Plan Amendment land use change
should solely be considered upon the appropriateness of multiple family units
versus a singular family unit on the property and not a future development
plan. Since it is possible the senior citizen home might never be constructed,
the Council must be fully satisfied that any type of multi-family residential
unit would be appropriate for this property. However, there appears only to be
two methods in which the property might be restricted to seniors, those being:.
1) A record development agreement; and
2) A record deed restriction~
Since it is questionable either could be enforced against future land owners,
staff would prefer these two alternatives not be considered. The greatest
protection still remains with ultimate zoning and use permits which would be
necessary for this property.
Should this General Plan Amendment be approved, a zone change to the PD {planned
development) zone district would require all future land uses to be subject to
Use Permit approval. Therefore, should a future City Council deem apartments,
condominiums or townhomes to not be appropriate for this site, upon specific
findings, use permits for such projects could be denied. Therefore, in Staff's
opinion should this General Plan Amendment proceed, the PD zone should be
utilized rather than the R-3 multiple family residential zone.
GPA84-3d
page two
RECO~ENDAT~ON:
Pleasure of the City Council.
DOleD D. LAMM, v
Dt rector of Community Development
DDL:do
Community Development Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
9,4
9.5
9.6
9.7
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE'ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE-FAMILY RELATIVE TO THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1262 BRYAN AVENUE
The City Council of the City of Tustln does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. Section 65356.1 of the Government Code of the state
of California provides that when it is deemed to be in
the public interest, the legislative body may amend a
part of the General Plan.
B. That in accordance with Section 65356 of the
Government Code of the state of California, a public
hearing was duly advertised and held on June 11, 1984
on the application of the property owner initiated by
Goldrtch, Kest and Associates to consider General Plan
Amendment No. 84-3d to reclassify the property to
Residential Multiple-Family use.
C. That a Negative Declaration has been applied for to
comply with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is hereby approved.
D. That the change in classification would be in the
public interest and not detrimental to the welfare of
the public or the surrounding property owners.
II.
The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment
No. 84-3d amending the Land Use Element to reclassify
the property at 1262 Bryan Avenue from Single-Family
Residential to Multiple-Family Residential.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City
Council held on the day of , 1984.
ATTEST:
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
30N¥'1