HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 4 G.P. AMEND 84-3D 07-02-84AGENDA,- -,
DATE: July 2, 1984
PUBLIC HEARING
NO. 4
7-2-84
Inter- Corn
SUgJ (CT:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Community Development Department
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-3D
Applicant: Goldrtch, Kest & Associates
Owner: Robert F. Miller
Location: 1262 Bryan Avenue
General Plan
Designation: Single-Family Residential
Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential
Background & ~scusston
This 1.2 acre parcel of land is a residual piece of property that remained for
Mr. Miller's private home after the subdivision of Tract 4334 in 1961.
Presently, the generel plan designation is single-family residential along the
easterly and southerly property lines of this parcel. Along the westerly
property line the general plan designation is multi-family residential with
apartments. ·
Goldrtch, Kest and Associates is requesting that the City amend the general plan
for this parcel from single-familY residential to multi-family residential. The
applicant has a particular use in mind for a development that would require a
multi-family designation and ultimately a change of zone (from R-1 to R-3).
The proposed use is a board and care facility that would accommodate senior
citizens only. This use would be similar to Tustin Hacienda on Third Street.
Th~ issue in this request is which land use would be the best for this property
and the City.
Single-Family Residential - If the land use is retained as single-family, then 6
or 7 homes could be built with a substandard private street which would not be
beneficial to the City. In this configuration the homes might al so be built as
close as five feet to the ~ear property lines.
Multi-Family Residential - If the land use is changed to multiple-family the
project could have standard driveways with separate yards at a low density or
could be a single purpose use such as a board and care facility with 30 to 50
foot setbacks from the single-family homes along the property lines.
General Plan Amendment No. 84-3d
July 2, 1984
Page 2
Conclusion
Based on site desfgn perhaps the board and care factltty land use would be in
the best interests of the single-family neighbors since thts use would provide
the greatest setbacks. Enclosed is a conceptual siTM plan which was submitted
by the developer. Staff has not completed a detailed review of this plan since
the issue at hand is the General Plan designation. Matters of design, height
and density would be discussed at the time of a zone change and use permit
review.
On June 11, 1984, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this amendment
by the adoption of Resolution No. 216Z. Enclosed are the minutes from that
meeting.
Recommndatton
Approve General Plan Amendment No. 84-3d by the adoption of Resolution No.
84-52. as recommended by the Planning Commission.
MAC:ih
Attachment:
Exhibit "A" General Plan Designation
Proposed Site Plan
Location Map
Minutes
Corn reunify Development Department
Plannlng Commission Htnutes
June 11,
Page 3
3. GEHERAL PLAN AI4ENDHENT HO. 84-3c - RECR£ATIOH £L~EHT OF THE TUSTTH
AREA GENERAL PLAN
Shows a comprehensive system of areas and publtc sttes for recreation.
Pregr~ms are proposed that address the co~mJntty'~tde needs and
requirements for recreational areas.
An environmental assessment of the Recreation Element ts tncluded and
referenced wlthtn the document.
E~derd )~ntgh'c presented s'caff's report and reco~t~endatton CO conttnue ss
contained ~n ".he Report co the Planotng Comtsston dated June ].1, ]*984.
Che~rmen Sharp opened the publtc hearing at 8:14 p,m. Seetng no one
wtshtn§ to speak, tt was moved by Nhtte~ seconded h)' ~4etl co contlnce the
publtc heertng to the next regular me~ttng on June ZS, 1984. ~lotton
carr~ ed? 5-0.
4. GENERAL PLAN AI4END~IENT NO. 84-3d
Applicant: Goldr~ch, ICest and Associates
Location: 1262 Bryan Avenue
Request: That the General Plan be amended from
clasetftcatton co a ~lttple-fanflly classification
~lary Ann Chamberlain presented staff's report and recewndetton of
approval as contained ~n the Report co the Planntng Co,,utsston dated June
11, 1984. Coumrlsstonor ~etl asked tf the heartng had been properly
advertised end tf any response had been received. ~qs. Chember]a~n replted
the beartng had been advertised and no response had been received.
Chetr~mn Sharp opened the publtc beartng at 8:19 p.m. The followtn§ parson
spoke tn favor of General Plan Amendment Ho. 84-3d:
r4r. Emenuel Aftergut, represente'c~ve of the applicant, SCa~KI the
request was the flret step In seeking approval co cievelop a board
and care factltty for sentor citizens. ~r. Aftorg~t stet-°d he had
distributed flyers te neighboring property owners announcing a
meettng to dtscus$ the pro~Jec'c. T4r. Aftergut s~aced only one
property owner had attended but the flyer dld ~ve h~*s ~lephone
number ~n case of additional questlons.
An unidentified member of the audience, address 9tven as 1331 Bryan
Avenue spoke tn favor of the amendment.
The follow~ng person spoke tn opposition Co General ~lan Amendment Ho.
84-3d:
T4r. Dennts Mtchselmen, Charloma Ortve, expressed opposition to
the amendment stettng he felt the best use for the property would
be stngle-fanfllY, tn keeptng wtth the development of the rest of
the area.
Seelng no one else w~sh~ng to speak, Chetrmen Sharp closed the publtc
heartng at 8:35 p.m.
Tn response to Commission questions regarding control over development of
the parcel, ~lr. Lamm replted that the property could not be l~m~ted CO
particular use, such as the hoard and care facility, but a use pery, tt would
be r~qutred, gtv~n!] the Commission some discretionary control. He Stoted a
spectftc plan would not be appropriate for such a smell stte.
it was moved h:~ Nhtte, seconded by Puckett, to direct staff co prepare a
resolution of approva~ for consideration at the next meeting, l~otton
carrted~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE' ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE-FAMILY RELATIVE TO THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1262 BRYAN AVENUE
The City Council of the City of Tusttn does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. Section 65356.1 of the Government Code of the state
of California provides that when it is deemed to be in
the public interest, the legislative body may amend a
part of the General Plan.
B. That in accordance with Section 65356 of the
Government C~)de~f the state of California, a public
hearing was(~ull,v~advertised and held on June 11, 1984
on the appltc~on of the property owner initiated by
Goldrtch, Kest and Associates to consider General Plan
Amendment No. 84-3d to reclassify the property to
Residential Multiple-Family use.
C. That a Negative Declaration has been applied for to
co,~ly with the requirements of: the California
Environmental Quality Act and is hereby approved.
II.
O. That the change in classification would be in the
public interest and not detrimental to the welfare of
the public or the surrounding property owners.
The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment
No. 84-3d amending the Land Use Element to reclassify
the property at 1262 Bryan Avenue from Single-Family
Residential to Multtple-Famtly Residential.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City
Council held on the day of , lg84.
ATTEST:
Ursula g. Kennedy, Mayor
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
UJ
gNV'I UVgl ~
30NY1