Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 04-02-84 TUSTIN PLANNING COI~ISSION ACTION AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING March 26, 1984 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES PUBLIC CONCERNS REPORTS NO. 1 4-2-84 7:30 P.M., CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS White/Puckett AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WI[IL, WIIITE, SHARP For Meeting Held March 12, 1984 Approved as submitted, Puckett abstained (limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL'NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD CONSENT CALENDAR None ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION. None. CONTINUED PUBLIC HF_ARINGS 1. AMENDMENT NO. 84-1 TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE Applicant: Request: Initiated by the Tustin Planning Commission Allow large family day care homes for up to twelve (12) children subject to a conditional use permit in the single-family residential districts. Continued to next regular meeting on April 9, 1984. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. USE PERMIT 84-9 Applicant: Location: Request: Su Chan Lee 17400 E. 17th Street, Suite F Authorization to install and operate a retail dry cleaning plant Approved, 5-0. Planning Commission Action Agenda March 26, 1984 Page 2 Applicant: Locati on: Request: ZONE CHANGE 84-1 An action initiated by the Planning Commission 17361 McFadden Avenue To change the zone for the property from the Residential Suburban District {R-4) to the Retail Commercial District (C-1). Approved, 5-0, Resolution No. 2151, recommending Zone Change 84-1 to the City Council. AOMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 1. Old Business None. 2. New Business a. Request for Zone Change By unanimous vote, directed staff to initiate zone change proceedings. STAFF CONCERNS 2. Report on Council Actions - March 19, 1984 Report received and ftled. COI~IISSIO# CONCERNS A0JOURNME#T: At 8:40 to next regular meeting on April 9, 1984 TUSTIH PLANNING COI~ISSI6~ AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING March 26, 1984 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M., CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WEIL, WHITE, SHARP APPROVAL OF MINUTES PUBLIC CONCERNS For Meeting Held March 12, 1984 (limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD CONSENT CALENDAR ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION. None, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. AMENDMENT NO. 84-1 TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE Applicant: Request: Initiated by the Tustin Planning Commission Allow large family day care homes for up to twelve (12) children subject to a conditional use permit in the single-family residential districts. Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. USE PERMIT 84-9 Applicant: Su Chan Lee Location: 17400 E. 17th Street, Suite D Request: Authorization to install and operate a retail dry cleaning plant Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Planning Commissio) March 26, 1984 Page 2 genda 2. ZONE CHANGE 84-1 Applicant: An action initiated by the Planning Commission Location: 17361 McFadden Avenue Request: To change the zone for the property from the Residential Suburban District (R-4) to the Retail Commercial District (C-i). Presentation: Alan Warren, Senior Planner ADMINISTRATIVE I~TTERS 1. 01d Business None. 2. New Business a. Request for Zone Change Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain STAFF CONCERNS 2. Report on Council Actions - March 19, 1984 Presentation: Donald D. Lamm Director of Community Development COI~IS$IO# CON~RNS ADJOURNNENT: To next regular ~eting on April 9, 1984 MINU~S OF A ~GUI_AR ll~ETING OF 'rile PLANNING C0~IIISSION OF Tile CI'I~ ~ TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA March 12, 1984. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 7:31 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tusttn, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Well and the Invocation was given by Commissioner White. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: Also present: James B. Sharp, Chairman Ronald White, Chairman Pro Tem Mark Ainslie Kathy Well Charles Puckett Alan Warren, Senior Planner Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney Janet Hester, Recording Secretary MINOTES Minutes for the meetin ': ....... : . of F b r 27, 1984 were approved as submitted. PUBLIC CONCERNS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Resolution No. 2148 - Use Permit 84-5 - Robert P. Warmington Company 2. Resolution No. 2143 - Use Permit 84-3 - Maurice Lebanoff Moved by Well, seconded by White, adoption of the Consent Calendar. carried, 4-0, Puckett absent. PUBLIC HEARINGS Motion 1. USE PERMIT 84-6 Applicant: Albertson's Inc. Location: 13852 Red Hill Avenue Request: Convert an existing grocery store into a liquor mart Alan Warren presented staff's report stating the application:had been withdrawn and submitted into record a letter from the applicant requesting acceptance of the withdrawal. Mr. Warren stated that many letters and telelphone calls had been received from groups and individuals opposed to the project. He stated that as many of those in opposition had been contacted and informed the application had been withdrawn, thus their absence from the meeting this evening. It was moved by Ainslie, seconded by Well, to accept the withdrawal of the application and receive and file staff's report. Motion carried, 4-0. 2. USE PERMIT 84-7 Applicant: Location: Request: Karyn Cripps 15411 Red Hill Avenue, Suites D & E Authorization to conduct a gymnastic school for children ages 18 months to 12 years Jeff Davis presented staff's report and recommendations. Chairman Sharp asked why'a limit was placed on the age. Mr. Dav~s replied it was to eliminate the possibility of parking problems caused by students old enough to drive. Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 1984 Page 2 Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chairman Sharp closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. Commissioner Well recognized the applicant and asked how many teachers were ultimately projected for the school, how many would be present at one time and 'how many classes would be conducted. Ms. Cripps replied there would be 8-10 teachers, 4-5 present at any one time and that classes were one-hour long, staggered throughout the day. Commission White asked that the minutes reflect the Commission's willingness to raise the age limit if the applicant wishes at a later date to make such a request. It was moved by Ainslie, seconded by White, approval of Use Permit 84-7 by the adoption of Resolution No. Z147 with the added condition that the hours of operation be limited to g:O0 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. dnles% Otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development. Motion carried, 4-0, Puckett absent. 3. AMENDMENT NO. 84-1 TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE Applicant: Request: Initiated by the Tustin Planning Commission Allow large family day care homes for up to twelve (12) children subject to a conditional use permit in the single-family residential districts. Jeff Davis present staff's report and recommendation to open and continue the hearing to the next regular meeting on'March 26, 1984 pending comments from the City Attorney. Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. It was moved by White, seconded.'by Well, to continue the hearing to the next regular meeting on March 26, 1984. Motion carried, 4-0, Puckett absent. ADMIKISTIL~TIV[ MATTERS 1. Old Business a. Review of Planting Plan for Tract 12018 Alan Warren presented staff's report and recomm~dation$?'~Cbmmissioner Wetl commended Mr. Warren on a good report. It was moved by'Well, seconded by Ainslie, to approve the planting plan, by Minute Order, with the' retention of three (3) trees as indicated on the grading plan and the inclUsion, of staff'~recommendations~as:cbntained~ih the report dated March r~2, 1984. Motion carried, 4-0, Puckett absent. 2. New Business a. Extended Temporary Use Permit/1984 Summer Olympic Advertising Jeff Davis presented staff's report and recommendations. In response to Commission questions, Mr. Davis replied that the businesses wanting to display such advertising would have to apply for a temporary use permit. The application is subject to review to determine official sponsorship and allow review of the type of banners to be displayed. It was moved Atnslte, seconded by White, by Minute Order, to authorize the Director of Community Development to issue temporary use permits for official Olympic sponsors to display banners for the duration of the Games. Commissioner Well asked when the authorization would take effect. Mr. Davis replied it Would be effective Tuesday, March 13, 1984 and would terminate with the closing of the Games. Motion carried, 4-0, Puckett absent. Planning Commission Minutes March [2, [984 Page 3 b. Design Review No. 5-84/First Street and Centennial gay Alan Warren presented staff's report and recommendations. Commissioner Well asked if the buildtng was speculative or had tenants already bqen determined. Mr. Warren replied the building was, for the most part, speculative. It was moved by Weil, seconded by A{nslie, to receive and file staff's report. Motion carried, 4-0, Puckett absent. STAP CONCERNS 1. Departmental Status Report Alan Warren presented staff's report. By unanimous informal consent, the Commission received and ftled staff's report. 2. Report on Council Actions - March 5, 1984 Alan Warren presented staff's report. By unanimous informal consent, the Commission received and filed staff's report. COI~ISSION CONCERNS Commissioner Weil expressed concern regarding the brevity of the Planning Commission Action Agenda. She suggested perhaps the Agenda could be expanded to provide more information on controversial items, thereby providing better communication with the Council. Commissioner Well relayed information on the Planning Commissioners Institute in San Diego, which she and Commissioner Puckett attended. Commissioner Ainslie commended the Tustin Community Hospital for the excellent care he received recently. ADJOURNIIE#T: At 8:12 p.m. to the next regular meeting on March 26, 1984. James B. Sharp, Chairman Janet Hester Recording Secretary Report to the Planning Commission CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 MARCH 26, 1984 SUBJECT: Amendment No. 84-1 to the Zoning Ordinance - Children's Day Care Homes Background On September 29, 1983, the Govenor signed into law, Senate Bi. ll No. 163, concerning the regulation of children's day care homes. The new legislation somewhat preempts local zoning authority in that small family day care homes (for six or fewer children) are to be allowed by right in single-family residential zones. Secondly, the law provides that cities must grant permits for large family day care homes (seven to twelve children) when certain conditions are met. The new law does give local jurisdictions some latitude by granting authority for ci~ies to require use permits for large family homes. Discussion As enacted, the legislation requires that cities must do one in regards to large family day care homes: of the following 1. Classify these homes as a permitted use. 2. Grant a nondiscretionary permit that complies with local ordinance prescribing reasonable standards and restrictions concerning spacing, concentration, traffic control and noise control...and, which complies with regulations of the State Fire Marshal.. 3. Require any large family day care homes to apply for a permit to use a lot zoned for single-family dwellings. There are several sections to this process. a) The use permit shall be granted if the same standards noted in #2 above are ~t. b) Not less than ten (10) days prior to the date a decision is made (by a Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission) written notice shall be sent to all property owners within a lO0-ft, radius of the property. c) No hearing on the application for permit issued...shall be held before a decision is made unless a hearing is requested by the applicant or other effected persons. Community Development Department IUOLUll~docI Iuot.udOIOAOCI AI!UnLU LUO:) 043 pea~xe · eoueb~pao'es~oN uD3sn£ paqsLLq~3sa SLa^eL esLou o3 3ou ~auuem ~ u~ po3ededo aq Lteqs samo4 a~eo-Xep 43n5 'saao4 ade ~eq3 '~[LeUOD3~PPV 'sauoz LeDOaemmo3 pue XL~meb-eLdD3Lnm aq3 u~ cae pue 3tseq Xde, aa~ ~pdepue3s pesododd aq3 'eaobadaq£ 'u~3sn± dob e3ueu[pao ue ude33ed o~ qo~q~ Xq eLqeL~A~ spd~pue3s adobDun Xue 3ou aae~ edeq3 '~eL saoue3su~ asoq3 uD pue 5uDuoz dDaq3 uL suoDsDAoad a^eq op XL3uaJdno saD3[3 amos 'aa^a~OH .uoD3eLS~6aL ~au aq3 ~o ade~e se~ pe3~e3uoo X3Do auo 3ou 'XL6UDsDaddns 6u~uueLd X3unoo aSueao Le~a^as ao XaAdn$ Lemao~uD ue pe3onpuoo aouDs seq X3~unmmoo aq3 bo uo~3ua~e a43 o~ 345noaq ada~ E9! ~5 bo s3uamaaDnbad · s3uemad~nbaa 6uL3~dado pue uo[3eooL 3~b[oeds e 03 33a[qns aq3 bo ~£~6 uo[33aS '~[6u[pdo33¥ 'LLOUnO3 ~313 Xq pao, dope aq aAD3euaa3Le P~Lq3 043 spuetauooa~ bb~3s 'a3e3S aq3 bo 3ua3uD pue s3uaaeaDnbed q3D~ XLdmOO LL~3S pue uo~3eu6Dsep auoz XLDmeb-eLSUDS e43 bo X3DJSa3u[ a43 uDe3utem 03 aapdo uI ~B6[ '9g qodeH ~-~B 'oN 3uampuauJ¥ eoueuDPaO 5u~uoz Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 84-1 March 26, 1984 Page 3 That the provisions of this amendment shall not apply to small or large family day care homes already licensed by the County and in operation prior to January 1, 1984. However, said homes may not increase the number of children cared for without complying with the standards listed herein. Reco~endatton Staff recommends the Commission adopt and forward to the City Council Resolution No. 2140 amending Tustin City Code Section 9223 to include "large family day care homes" as permitted uses subject to specific development standards. Assistant Planner JSD:jh Attachments: ResolutionlNo. 2140 Community Development Department 2 3 '4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2~ 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2140 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT OF SECTION 9223a OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE BY REQUIRING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES IN THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL {R-i) DISTRICT AND SECTION 9297 OF THE CITY CODE TO INCLUDE THE DEFINITION OF LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That there is a growing need for properly licensed care facilities within the Community. B. That as an alternative by which to provide such day care facilities, the State of California has authorized local jurisdictions to permit day care facilities for a maximum of twelve (12) children in Single-Family Residential zones. Such homes shall be approved upon findings that such facilities comply with all local ordinances presribing reasonable standards, restrictions and requirements concerning spacing and concentration, traffic control, parking and noise control relating to such facilities. C. That to ensure that the integrity of the Single- Family Residential zone is maintained, and to determine if each application for a large family day care home (defined as a home for seven to twelve children) is in compliance with all applicable standards for spacing and concentration, traffic contro), parking and noise control, Section 9223a of the Tustin City Code shall be amended to include as a permitted use subject to a permit issued by the Community Development Department: Large Family Day Care Homes for up to a maximum of twelve (12) children. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Tustin, that Section 9223a of the Tustin City Code be amended to read as follows: Section 9223a 6. Large Family Day Care Homes, caring for seven to twelve children subject to the following standards: a. Such day care homes shall be operated in a manner not exceeding the noise levels in the Tustin Noise Ordinance. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 9.2 23 24: 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2140 Page 2 III. b. All property owners within 100 feet of a proposed large family day care home shall be notified of the intent to establish such a home. c. A permit shall not be granted for a day care home that would be established within 100 feet of any existing licensed home or if any written protest against permit issuance is received from an abutting property owner to the proposed large family day care home. d. All homeowner vehicles shall be parked on private property during hours of operation of the day care home. e..Any employed assistants shall park on the private property of the large family day care home. f. Any day care home must comply with all regulations adopted and enforced by the State Fire Marshal. g. The rear yard of the home must be enclosed by a minimum six foot (6') fence. h. That the provisions of this amendment shall not apply to small or large family day care homes licensed by the County and in operation prior to January i, 1984. However, said homes may not increase the number of children cared for without' complying with the standards listed herein. The Planning Commission further recommends to the City Council that Section 9297 be amended to include the following: Section 9297 Definitions "Large Family Day Care Homes" means a family dwelling unit, non-institutional in character, properly licensed by the County of Orange, which provides day care only, for a maximum of twelve (12) children ages 16 years or younger, including the licensee's own children. Commission held on the PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning day of , 1984. Janet Hester Recording Secretary James B. Sharp, Chairman PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 Planning Commission HARCH 26, 1984 SUBdECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: REQUEST: Use Permit 84-9 Su Chun Lee EMS Development Company 17440 E. Seventeenth Street, Enderle Center Planned Community Commercial Authorization to operate a retail dry cleaning establishment Ofscusston Section 9233c of the Zoning Code states that cleaning and dyeing establishments are a permitted use subject to a use permit. Mr. Lee is requesting authorization to operate a dry cleaning plant with a retail area. The main areas of concern are: The'plant activities regarding noxious fumes and unpleasant odors. A permit must be obtained from the Air Quality Management District which will help to mitigate these concerns; 2. Any additional roof top equipment shall be screened from view and be constructed of materials matching those existing in the center; 'and + The owner should recognize that the tenant space may, by its location within the complex, not afford adequate drive-by customer visibility and that the sign code does not provide for additional signing identity beyond that provided by the center's master sign plan. Findings & Conclusions 1. The application of the use Is in regulations of the Tustin City Code. conformance with the commercial zoning 2. The parking accommodations for the shopping center are more than adequate for the existing uses and this proposed use. Community .Development Department Use Permit 84-9 March 26, 1984 Page 2 Recommendation Approve Use Permit 84-9 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2149 with conditions as listed in Exhibit "A". M~ry An.~ CSatnberl ai n Associate Planner MAC:ih Attachments: Site Plan Floor Plan Exhibit "A" Resolution No. 2149 Community Development Department Exhibit 'A" Conditions of Approval Use Permit 84-9 o The unit shall conform to the requirements of the 1979 Uniform Building and Fire Codes for such a use. All retail and dry cleaning activity shall be conducted within the building. All roof top equipment shall be screened from view and be constructed of materials matching those existing in the center. This plan shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and the shopping center architect. Permits must be obtained from the Air Quality Management District. All signs require permits before installation and shall conform to the Center Master Sign Plan. L Community Development Department EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN AND DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES i'ITH STREET Not: ~o soft,lo ol' &bsolu~e des:L&n. The Ptemi~e~ referred {0 in Section I of the Le~e to which this Exhibil i~ attached, as shown on IbC ploI plan ,h-,=. or 17440 ITth Slreel, Tuslin. CA, and contaimng appro~l ,,,~h 110 8 ~quare f~l. O 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 '18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2149 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING USE PERMIT NO. 84-9 TO OPERATE A RETAIL DRY CLEANING ESTABLISHMENT AT 17440 E. SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUITE D, ENDERLE CENTER The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application (Use Permit 84-9) was filed by Su Chert Lee, requesting authorization to operate a retail dry cleaning establishment at 17440 E. Seventeenth Street, Suite D, in Enderle Center. B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use as evidenced by the following findings: 1. The use is in conformance with the commercial zoning regulations of the Tustin City Code. 2. The parking accommodations for the shopping center are more than adequate for the existing uses and this proposed use. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin and should be granted. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. F. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. G. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Department. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24: 25 26 27 98 Resolution No. 21~= Page 2 The Planning Commission hereby approves Use Permit No. 84-9 to authorize the operation of a dry cleaning establishment at 17440 E. Seventeenth Street, Suite D, in Enderle Center, subject to the following conditions: 1. The unit shall conform to the requirements of the 1979 Uniform Building and Fire Codes for such a use. II. 2. All retail and dry cleaning activity shall be conducted within the building. All roof top equipment shall be screened from view and be constructed of materials matching those existing in the center. This plan shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and the shopping center architect. Permits must be obtained from the Air Quality Management District. All signs require permits before installation and shall conform to the Center Master Sign Plan. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission held on the 26th day of March, 1984. James B. Sharp, Chairman Janet Hester Recording Secretary Report to the Planning Commission PUBLIC HEARING NO. 2 MARCH 26, 1984 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: REQUEST: Zone Change 84-1 Mary Ann Barker and the Tustin Planning Commission 17361 McFadden Avenue To change to zone designation from the existing R-3 District to the C-1 District Background & Discussion 'On February 27, 1984, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit No. 84-1 which authorized the use of a multiple-family district parcel as a parking lot for a retail commercial shopping center. The land use General Plan designation for the parcel is Commercial and a condition of the use permit approval was that the owner would agree to bring the zoning district into conformance with the General Plan. ~ The property adjacent to this small parcel on which the building will be located is in the C-1 District and it therefore would be appropriate to keep the project within the same classification. Reco~ndatton Recommend approval of Zone Change adoption of Resolution No. 2151. 84-1 to the Tustin City Council by the Senior Planner Attachment: Resolution No. 2151 Community Development Department 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2151 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING RE- ZONING OF THE PROPERTY AT 17361 MCFADDEN AVENUE TO THE RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (C-1) The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application, (Zone Change 84-1) has been filed on behalf of Mary Anne Barker and the Tustin Planning Commission to recommend a zone change for the property at 17361 McFadden Avenue (Assessor's Parcel #402-331-15) to the Retail Commercial District (C-1). B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. C. That a zone change should be granted for the following reason: 1. The proposed zone designation is in conformance with the Land Use Element of the Tustin Area General Plan. D. Development of subject property shall be in accordance with the policies adopted by the City Council; Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official; Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal; and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. E. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Director of Community Development Department. F. A Negative Declaration has been filed in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 84-1 to designate the Retail Commercial District (C~1) for the property at 17361 McFadden Avenue. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of March, lg84. James B. Sharp, Chairman Janet Hester Recording Secretary ZONING MAP ~ TUSTIN, CA. PER RES. NO. OATED PER ORD. NO. DATED EXHIBIT A RETAIL COMMERICAL, o~/' [.,-I ~.~ ~'~-~' / -- M C FADDE N ST. ~/~ Report to the Planning Commission NEW BUSINESS NO. I MARCH 26, 1984 SUBJECT: Request for Zone Change Enclosed is a request for-a zone change for the property at 14462 Red Hill Avenue. The property is currently zoned R-4 and the General Plan calls for it to be Professional. The owner is now requesting that the Planning Commission initiate the change of zone from R-4 (Suburban multiple-family) to Planned Community Professional'(PCJPR). Section 9295c of the City Code states that the Planning Commission shall pass a resolution of intention. Enclosed is a copy of Mr. Matt Nisson's request and a resolution for the Planning Commission's consideration initiating a joint application. Recomefldatton Adopt Resolution No. 2150 which initiates the zone change for 14462 Red Hill Avenue. 'M~ry mn Chamb~rlafn Associate Planner MAC:jh Attachments: Letter from Mr. Matt Nisson Resolution No. 2150 Community Development Department january 30 1984 Attn. planning commission, I am the owner of the property on the NE corner of Red Hill and Walnut avenues. It has come to my attent'ion that by oversight, my present . zoning does not conform to the general plan enacted by the city of Tustin. I hereby request that the present multiple family zoning be changed to the orofessional zone as is shown on the general plan. Respectfully, 14462 Red Hill ave. Tustin, Calif. Copy- city council RESOLUTION NO. 2~50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING A JOINT ZONE CHANGE'FOR 14462 RED HILL AVENUE The Planning Commission of .the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That the Land Use Element of the Tustin Area General Plan designates the area known as 14462 Red Hill Avenue as Professional. That the provisions of the Planning and Zoning Act require that city zoning ordinances be consistent with the general plan of the city. Ce That the owner of the property, Matt N~sson, has requested a zone change to bring the zoning into conformance with the GeneraT Plan. II. The Planning Commission hereby on its own motion, joins in the application of the owner and authorizes staff to advertise a public hearing for the next available agenda. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of March, 1984. James B. Sharp, Chairman Janet Hester Recording Secretary Planning Commission MARCH 26, 1984 SUBJECT: Report on Council Actions - March 19, 1984 Oral presentation to be given by Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development /ih Attachments: City.Council Action Agenda - March 19, 1984 , Community Development Department ACTION AGENOA OF A REGULAR ~ETING OF THE llJSTIN CITY COUNCIL Ma~h 19, 1984 7:00 P.M. 7:0! I. CALL TO.ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ALL PRESENT II. ROLL CALL ROBERT WILT III. PUBLIC INPUT AND SEVEIU~L OTHERS SPOKE AGAINST THE INCREASED FEES FOR ~0 PITCH SOFT1)~L N~) THE .CONDITION OF THE FIELD. THIS Ill~ TO BE ON THE APRIL 2, [984, AGENDA. IV. PROCLN4ATION LARRIE LLEWELLYN, 1. TUSTIN BREAKFAST LIONS CLUB PRESIDENT OF THE CLUB ACCEPTED THE PROCLAP, RTION ~JUUC ROWLAND , DIRECTOR OF DISASTER EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE RED CROSS ACCEPTED A PROCLA~IATION PROCLAIMING I~RCH AS 'RED CROSS V. PUBLIC HEARING - None VI. CONSENT CALENDAR APPROVED 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - March 5, i984 APPROVED APPROVED STAFF RECOI~I~)ATI ON APPROVED STAFF RECOmmENDATION RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $110,261.77 APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $526,045.68 SAV-ON DRUGS, INC., ET AL. V. COUNTY OF ORANGE, CITY OF TUSTIN, ET. AL., OCSC CASE NO. 423348, CITY CLAIM NO. 84-4 Authorize the County Counsel of the County of Orange .to defend the City of Tustin in subject action pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 5149 as recommended by the City Attorney. REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING DURING Sl~EEPING OPERATIONS (Alliance Avenue adjacent to the Tustin West Apartments.) Authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-street parking during street sweeping hours, 6:00 a.m. to noon on Thursday, at 16531 and 16505 through 16501 Alliance Avenue, adjacent to-the Tustin West Apartments and that warnings be issued in lieu of citations for the first 30 'days' after sign installation as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 84-27 APPROVED STNrF ~COI~E~ION 5. RESOLUTION NO. 84-27 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FJ4BOSSED CONCRETE MED[AN PAVING IMPROVEMENTS Adoption of Resolution No. 84-27 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. ( OF CLAIM OF MICHAEL P. & MICHELE N. ARONCHICK; DATE REJECTION OF LOSS: 11-19-83; DATE FILED W/CITY: 2-13-84; CLAIM NO. 84-3 Rejection of subject claim as recommended by City Attorney. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 1 3-19-84 AppRovED STAFF RECOI~qENOATION APPROVED STAFF RECOI~ENOATI0# ADOPTED RESOLUTION 8.. NO. 84-29 APPROVED STAFF 9. REC01~ENOATION APPROVED STAFF 10. REC0{~4E)4DATIO# APPROVED STAFF RECOI,~ENOAT*iON STAFF .,.I{~ENOATI OM ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 4 REJECTION OF CLAIM OF MICHAEL P. & MICHELE N. ARONCHICK; DATE OF LOSS: 11-19-83; DATE FILED W/CITY: 2-13-84; CLAIM NO. 84-3 Rejection of subject claim as recommended by City Attorney. REJECTION OF CLAIM OF ELIZABETH MOORE; DATE OF LOSS: 6-17-83; DATE FILED W/CITY: 9--23-83; CLAIM NO. 83-34 Rejection of subject claim as recommended by City Attorney. .. RESOLUTION NO. 84-29 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FRONTIER PARK PRE-SCHOOL PLAY AREA AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS' Adoption of Resolution No. 84-29 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. HOMEOWNER REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 14092 Woodlawn Removal of subject trees and replacements be made of Mr. McMahon's choice from the City approved tree list as recom- mended by the Maintenance Superintendent. HOMEOWNER REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 14621.Buckingham Rd. Removal of subject trees and replacements be made of Mrs.' Sagan's choice from the City approved 'tree list as recom- mended by the Maintenance Superintendent. 11. HOMEOWNER REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 14452 Heights Dr. Denial as recommended by the Maintenance Superintendent." 12. HOMEOWNER REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 1971 Hampshire Road Denial as recommended by the Maintenance Superintendent. 13. RESOLUTION N0.'84-28 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12138 Adoption of Resolution No. 84-28 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. VII. ORDINANCES VIII. ORDINANCES ADOPTED OPJ)INANCE NO. 905 1. Will( ADOITIONAL NOPJ)ING ADDED TO PARAGRAPH 32 IX. OLD X. NEW 1. APPROVED STAFF RECOI~NDATION CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA FOR INTRODUCTION - None FOR ADOPTION ORDINANCE NO. 905 - An Ordinance of the City of Tustin, Califor- nia, AMENDING THE FRANCHISE FOR A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM GRANTED TO SIX STAR CABLEVISION OF TUSTIN, INC. AND APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP FROM SIX STAR CABLEVISION OF TUSTIN, INC. TO UNITED CABLE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, LTD. BUSINESS - None BUSINESS REVENUE SHARING FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Approval of funding levels for 1983/84 Revenue Sharing to community non-profit groups as follows: Assessment Treatment and Services Center - $g,o00; Boys Club of Tustin - $5,500; Feedback Foundation/TLC - $3,000; Bartlett Center/Meals on Wheels - $2,000; COPES, Child or Parent Emergency Services, Inc. - $9,500; Lestonnac Clinic - $1,000; and Senior Center Feasibility $7,700 as recommended by the Director of Community and Administrative Services. Page 2 3-19-84 APPBOVEO S'FA~'F Z. WATER WELL DESIGN AND TEST HOLE PROJECT R~NOATION AND EI)r~AR ASKEI) Authorize staff to: a) Investigate l. ~VE A ~ETIIIG WITH BOYLE REP. entering into a joint effort with AMD BOB LEOEMOEC~ER BEFORE THE NEXT P~ETING TO LOOK AT ACCELERATIMG THE kELL APPIU)VEI) STA~CF 3. RECO~I~ENOATION APPROVEI) STAFF 4. RECOI~JiOATI O~ XI. REPORTS RECEIVEO ~ FILED 1. [ "IVEB ~110 FILEO 2. the feasibility of Orange County Water District to construct and operate a nitrate removal facility at the Main Street Water Plant; and b) Proceed Nth the well construction and test hole at a single location, Columbus-Tustin parksite at this time, in lieu of the previously approved two locations as recommended by the Director of Public Works~City Engineer. · SANTA ANA TP. ANSPORTATION CORRIDOR TRANSIT ELEMENT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Direct staff to respond with the comments and concerns of the City as outlined in subject report as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. AWARD OF BID FOR CITY HALL CARPETING Award the contract for removal and replacement of carpeting in the west section of City Hall to Harlow's Contract Flooring Division for the amount of $$,727.00 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - March 12, 1984 All actions of the Planning Commission are final unless appealed by the City Council. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WATER MASTER PLAN SCHEDULING.. Receive and file. RECEIVED AND FILE]} 3. TEMPORARY OLYMPIC GAMES ADVERTISING Receive and file. HUS-TON XII. OTHER BUSINESS A~SI(EI) FOR A ~0~4~0 SESSION FOR LE~ MAlql~S F(7~LOWIMG THE ~k'TING. HOVI:Tt TO ~P~VE A~O~ ~E'S ~ ~ ~E ~ ~REWO~S E~ ~T UP ~ZBLE ~YS ~ ~N~ ~E~Z~ IN ~SIDENTI~ ~, GREIGE ~ ~T ~ L~ I~0 ~IK ~ A ~R AT ~ERT ~ ~ ~ ~F ~E ~NY TOTS P~G~ ~OM ~ ~ US~ BY ~DER ~ILD~. ~V~ ~ ~PPORT ~VE~OR'S ~ORTIOM~MT PROPO~- G~IMKE ~ ~T ~IoA~s ~ ~MT~ ~T ~GMS ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~U~. S~T~ELLI ~ ~T ~ L~ IMTO ~ IS ~S~MSIBLE ~R ~ ~E O~IM~E 0I~H ~G ~GLIM ~ P~SPECT. 8:45 XlII. ~0URNMENT - To a C]osed Session ~r legal ~tters and the~e ~ the nexC regular ~ettn9 on Apr,] 2, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 3-19-84 8:45 1. ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN REDEVELOPI~#T AGENCY lqarch i9, 1984 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ALL 2. PRESENT APPROVE]) 3. ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES of March 5, 1984. APPROVED 4. APPROVED 5. STAF'F RECOI~EI~)ATION APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $16,739.88 EMBOSSED CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING IMPROVEMENTS ON FIRST STREET BETWEEN "B" ;TREET AND NEWPORT AVENUE Authorize the Tustin City Council to act on behalf of the Redevelopment, Agency in administrating and disbursing of funds for paving of narrow neck center medians with embossed concrete on, First Street between "B" Street and Newport Avenue and alTocate R.D.A. funds in the amount of $21,000.00 to accomplish said work as recon~ended by the Engineering Department. IPTED 6. r,r..SOLUTI ON NO. RDA 84-6 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 84-6 - A Resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING THE DESIGN OF A 4,307 SQUARE'FOOT RETAIL COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL WAY AND. FIRST STREET Adoption of Resolution No. RDA 84-6 as recommended by the Community Development Department. NONE 7. 8:48 8. OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT - To the next regular meeting on April 2, 1984. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page 1 3-19-84