Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 03-01-82MINUTES OF A ~uA~ ~ETING OF ~ ~STIN CITX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way m,,,'Cb 1, 1982 TO O~DER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey at 4:19 p.m. Councilpersons Present= Councilpersons Absent: Others Present= Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli Sharp James G. ~murke, City Attorney william A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public works Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Judi Ormsby, Recreation Supervisor Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approx~ately 15 in the audience The Council recessed at 4:20 p.m. for set-up of ~he following pre- sentation. The meeting was reconvened at 4:26 p.m. with Mayor Sharp absent. III- ~TATI~ 1. None · O]~b~ZIG~ CX~JH'rx ~dX~g~ DXb~X~t,.XC~ -pEP. IP-~AT. C~NAT, Gordon Elser, Information Officer, Orange County Water District, gave a slide presentation on the Peripheral Canal Project and requested Council's suppor~ of Proposition 9 which includes the Peripheral Canal as well as other facilities. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to agen~ize a resolution in sup- port of Proposition 9 for the March 15 meeting. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 107 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve t. he entire Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0, Shar~ absent. 1. APPROVAL OF ~I~=r~- February 16, 1982. 2. APPBO~L O~ D~MAND8 in the amountof $172,582.57. ~A~FICATI~ O~ PAI~%0~ in the amount of $96,820.85. 5O ~OX~F~0~ NO. 82--5 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR ANI- MAL SHELTER AND ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES Adoption of Resolution No. 82-5 as recommended by the City Attorney. 23 ~,~TI~ NO. 82-16 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS AND POLLING PLACES, APPOINTING PRECINCT BOARD MEMBERS AND FIXING COMPENSATION FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF SAID CITY O~ TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 1982, HERETOFORE CA?.?,ED BY RESOLUTION NO. 81-142 OF THE CITY COUNCIL Adoption of Resolution No. 82-16 as recommended by the City Clerk. 48 uITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 3-1-82 5e Se 10. RESO~UTIO~ NO. 82-17- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECU'£E AND SIGN AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES Adoption of Resolution No. 82-17 as recommended by the Personnel Director. 79 ~Q~EST FOR ~ ~ - 14681 ~ Removal of two parkway trees in front of 14681 Emerywood with no replacement of the one near the fire hydrant and the other one to be replaced with a tree from the City-approved list, selected by Mrs. Black, as recon~ended by the City Engineer · 86.1 I~v~ BO~LEFABD FEDE~an AID ~ (FA~) PBDJECT Authorize the Mayor to execute Program Supplement No. 3 to Local Agency/State Agreement No. 07-5271. 45 D~IA~ ~ CI~%X~ OF GEORGE ~- Date of Loss: 11-2-81, Filed With City= 1-15-82, Claim No. 82-2 Deny claim of George Edwards as recomended by the City Attorney. 40 NOMINATI~ OF ~ux nY TO VOTING M~BEP~ZP C~ O~%NGE ~ S~IORCIT~S ~d)~ISO~ (~)~NCIL Recommended to direct staff to prepare a letter to the Orange County Division, League of Cities, recomending Ruby May as a votin~ m-mher to the Orange County Senior Citizens Advisory Council, authorize the Mayor to sign this letter, and authorize and encourage Councilmembers to voice their support for Mrs. May to appropriate League officials. 28 ~OX/~TIO~ NO. 82-18 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING THE BAIL SCHEDULE FOR TUSTIN CITY CODE VIOLATIONS Adoption of ~solution No. 82-18 as reco~ended by the Police Chief. 82 VI. O~)INANC~S FOR INTrODUCTIOn- None ~ZI o O~DI- NANCES FOR ADOPTIO~ 1. VIII. O~D B~SINESS 1. O~DINANCE NO. 868 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 6, IRVINE BOULEVARD, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONVERSION It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 868 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. Following reading of the title by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 868 be passed and adopted. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None Sharp 104 The City Manager presented the staff report and recon~endation. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey, the City Manager stated the pole would supplement the two poles available through the School District for activities after the parade, not strictly for night activities. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 3-1-82 In response to Councilman Edgar, the City Manager and Recreation Supervisor responded that set-up of the pole would be handled by the School District. Council ~iscussion followed regarding the amount of use the third pole would have, and the possibility of passing some of the costs on to booth renters. The Mayor Pro Tem recognized Margaret Byrd in the audience, who stated that some people do not rent booths due to the present rental rate. The Recreation Supervisor noted that the booth rental rate is $75.00 with the number of booths at approximately 40. She noted that Cherrill Webb would be available at the evening session. The City Manager suggested that Council continue the matter to the next meeting, with staff to report on possible uses for the equipment and a payback schedule through a surcharge on the booths. The Director of Finance interjected that the total City contribution in two years has been $12,000 plus an addi- tional $300-$400 annually for insurance coverage. Prior to that, the City contributed approximately $2,500. In three years, the City has not received any return on that investment. Council concurred to continue the matter to March 15, 1982. uuwP~M~TA~ APP~P]~kTIO~ - P~CH]~E OF POliCE DEP~T TAPES The City Manager presented the staff report and recommendation. As reconm~ended in the memo ~ated February 24, 1982, prepared by the City Manager, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to authorize supplemental appropriation of $5,100 from the General fund unrestricted balance for the purchase of 100 tapes to be used in ~he taping of police communications. Motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 82 ~-~- 2. SIGN C0DB The Co~z~unity Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation. Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the report dated March 1, 1982, it was moved-by Saltarelli, sec- onded by Kennedy, to approve the request from Mercury Savings for a 4 sq. ft. sign (8'x6"). Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 93 ~ M~NAG~ The City Manager announced the following public meetings: March 2, Costa Mesa City Hall, 7:00 p.m., for the North-South Central Corridor Study; March 18, Irvine High School; and March 16, Mission Vlejo High School, for the Foothill Corridor Route Location Study. Staff is monitoring the items and will make periodic reports to Council. 2 ,, COO~': ( '-/4A~ SA~TA~~I~T-T-T In response to Councilman Saltarelli, the Community Development Director clarified that the policy to schedule public hearings of great interest or not of a routine nature for the evening session applies to the Planning Agency, and Council policy is that all public hearing items are to be scheduled for 7:30 p.m. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, that fairly rou- tine City Council public hearings be scheduled for the afternoon meetings, and if a significant number of people are interested in the hearing, it can be continued to the evening session. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 3-1-82 Councilwoman Kennedy stated she could not support the motion and suggested the matter be tabled pending the proposed fomation of the Planning Co~nission after the April election. She continued that 75% of the population works, and it is difficult for those who do work to monitor Council action. Councilman Hoesterey stated that there are some public hearing items that carry a great deal of public interest and public input, and there are things covered in public hearings that appear to be fairly routine. Following further discussion, the motion carried 3-1, Kennedy opposed, Sharp absent. 83 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to agendize a resolution in support of a future Super Bowl being held at Ana- heim Stadium. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 38 4. N~D C~B~NG ~ E~ CAMINO ~ In response to Councilman Edgar's comments regarding red curbing at Sixth Street and E1 Camino Real, the Director of Public Works reported that staff does have a red curb plan which was to be implemented with the signal installation. He indicated that staff can proceed with the red curbing prior to signal installa- tion, and suggested that Council review same. Council concurred to agendize the plan for review. 92 5. ANNEXATXO~ ~,~-w,-x - IKV~E/~ES Following consideration of the report dated February 23, 1982, prepared by Dr. R. K. Fleagle, Planning Consultant, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize staff to conduct an opinion survey of the Irvine/Wass area to determine if an annexation proposal is feasible for subject area. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 24 XI. ~C~SS - ~ING It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to recess at 5:06 p.m. to the 7:30 p.m. evening session. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. CITY CO~CIL ~rING ~ 7=30 P.M. ~mu~r~NG TO O~DER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 7:34 p.m. II. l~ CAT.T. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Com. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Charles Thayer, Police Chief Approximately 25 in the audience III · P~BLIC CONCE~S None · CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 3-1-82 IV. HEA~ING 1. · ,01~E C~,NGE ~0. 82-1 - 13681 ~ ~rr.n AV~t~E O~D~NANC~ 11Oo 869 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ~ZONING 13681 ~EDHILL AVENUE FROM R-3 (2700) TO ( 1960 ) Mike Brote-~rkle, Community Develo~m0ent Director, reported that this Zone Change was requested by the applicant and involves 4 lots north of San J,,~ on the west side of Red Hill. This change would ~ermit him to build a fourplex instead of a tri- plex. Based upon the square footage proposed, the 2 spaces per unit is sufficient parking. This Zone Change is within the General Plan. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:39 p.m. There being no com- ments or objections, it was closed by the Mayor. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 869 have first read/ng by title only. Carried 5-0. Follow- ing the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 869 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to intro- duce Ordinance No. 869. Motion carried 5-0° 110 The City Manager reminded the Council of the joint B~development Agency and City Council meeting on March 8, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Councilwoman Kennedy recognized students fr~0 the Tustin High School Civic class. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 7:41 p.m. to the joint Adjourned Redevelopment Agency and City Coun- cil meeting on March 8, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council cham- bers and thence to the next regular meeting on March 15, 1982. CITY OF TUSTIN 300 Centenni~ Way Turn, Ca. 92.6~3. FIRST CLASS MAIL