Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA MINUTES 03-01-82 Ml~%rr~S OF A ~u~AR OF THE RED~-v~OPMENT ~NCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA February 16, 1982 1. Ca?.?. TO O~DER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 4:04 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. Agency Meafoers Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Kennedy, Sharp Hoesterey, Saltarelli James G. Rourke, City Attorney william A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, C~. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Royleen White, Community Services Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Edward Knight, Associate Planner Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 20 in the audience 3. APPNDVAL OF MI~u','~S It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the minutes of the February 1, 1982, regular meeting. Carried 2-0, Hoesterey and Saltarelli absent, Sharp abstaining. 4. NE~POP~ ~v~u,C BI~ TRATn BEP~ u~K~ ~EPLACEM~T AS recommended in the memo dated February 1, 1982, prepared by the Engi- neering Division, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following resolution and ass%~ning no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of recordation of Notice of Completion, authorize payment of the final 10% retention amount at that time: RESOLUTI~ NO. ~)A 82-1 - A Resolution of the Tustin Community Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Newport Avenue Bike Trail Berm Curb Replacement - Alfredo's Excavating & Paving Construction) Motion carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Saltarelli absent. 86 5. BT.T.'X"L' I~K:~H~:)~mJ~'I'IC~ I~OFE~TS - VAK~O~S LOCAT~(H~S Pursuant to the reco~endation contained in the memo dated January 22, 1982, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Edgar, sec- onded by Kennedy, to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. ~DA 82-2 - A Resolution of the Tustin Community Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI- FICATIONS FOR ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT I - Alley East of E1 Camin6 Real Between Main St. & 3rd St. PROJECT II - Tract No. 3994 Alley PROJECT III - E1 Camino Bank Alley Between 3rd St. & E1 Camino Real Carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Saltarelli absent. 95 6. APP~H]VAL OF DEMANDS It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to approve General Demands for the month of January, 1982, in the amount of $443,912.60 as recommended by the DirectQr of Finance. Motion-carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Saltarelli absent. 81 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Page 2, 2-16-82 AS recommended in the memo dated February 4, 1982, prepared by the Direc- tor of Public Works, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to direct staff to include within the 1982-83 RDA Capital Improvement Program fund- ing for the subject project in the amount of $14,000.00 and direct staff to execute the subject Improvement Agreement. In response to Mrs. Kennedy, the Director of Public Works stated that the City will get a fair return by including the property owner's dedication of the required right-of-way in exchange for the City constructing all required street improvements by saving acquisition costs, appraisal fees, and administrative staff costs, aside from the benefits to the City and community. Motion carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Saltarelli absent. 45 8. SX'l~P~%ti ~'~X~7- 175 "C" S'~m.? The Co, unity Development Director presented the staff report. He pointed out that the facility faces the park a~d has been designed to give it a residential appearance. More importantly, if the proposal is approved, it will inhibit the ability of the Redevelopment Agency or property owners in the area to consolidate lots since it would mandate that the alley access to the rear of this facility be maintained in order to provide parking. The ability to combine either four or six lots (remaining lots to the south) into a single integrated development would be restricted. At the present time the Agency does not have any active program of lot purchase and consolidation for resale to developers. The proposed project conforms with the C2 zoning underlying the Redevelopment District plan. If the Agency determines this development is inappropriate and not in keeping with the Redevelopment area, it should direct staff to work with this property owner and other property owners to attempt to accomplish more comprehensive development in the area. If not, then the Agency should direct staff to work with the property owner for the development as pro- posed. Mr. Edgar stated his opposition to perpetrating the alley. He stated he is in favor of supporting consolidation of adjoining lots for continuity. In terms of architectural style, he does not think it matters so long as it is not stark ultra-modernistic. Mrs. Kennedy concurred, but stated her preference for Victorian or Queen Anne architecture dominating the down- town area. The Comm%lnity Development Director stated that he understands the Agency's direction to be to work with the applicant to see if a proposal cannot be expanded to i~clude additional property. Secondly, that any development, even if limited to one lot, should not place dependence on utilization of the alley for access and utilization; if a project could be developed on one lot but did not utilize the alley for any of its purposes, it might be permitted, but the primary goal would be to see if consolidation could be generated. 81 9. AG~CX CO~CE~S None · 10. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adjourn at 4:16 p.m. to the next regular meeting on March l, 1982. Carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Salta- relli absent. RECORDING SECRETARY CHAIRMAN