Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 03-15-82Minutes of Regular Meeting March 15, 1982 The Planning Agency held a regular meeting Monday, March 15, 1982, at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 3:02 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Hoesterey and the invocation was given by Mr. Edgar. ROLL CALL Present: Sharp, Hoesterey, Edgar, Kennedy, Saltarelli (arrived at 3:10) Absent: Also present: None William Huston, City Manager Michael Brotemarkle, Community Development Director James Rourke, City Attorney Janet Hester, Recording Secretary MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting held March 1, 1982, were approved as submitted. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None PUBLIC CONCERNS: Mr. Charles Anderson, 255 W. 6th Street, addressed the Agency concern- ing a parking problem at his residence. He explained that when the clothing store across the street from his home had a sale a serious parking problem resulted. He listed the following conditions: 1. many times he can not get in or out of his driveway because of cars parked along his property; 2. because of the proximity of the cars he can not see the street when backing out of his drive; 3. delivery trucks have used his drive as a turn-around point and have caused damage to the concrete; 4. even though there is a four-way stop at the intersection, many times people ignore the sign; 5. the street is dirty and cluttered because the street sweeper can not get through to clean it. Mr. Anderson stated he has spoken to the manager of the store but with no results. The manager told Mr. Anderson that he had 30 employees but only 18 parking spaces. Mr. Anderson asked if there was any action the Agency or staff could take to help alleviate this problem. Chairman Sharp directed staff to look into the situation. Mr. Brotemarkle commented he would coordinate with the Public Works and Police Departments to see what could be done. OLD BUSINESS: Mr. Edgar moved approval of Resolution No. 2024 granting a sign variance to U-Haul of Orange County. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hoesterey. Motion carried: 4-1 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: SHARP, SALTARELLI, HOESTEREY, EDGAR KENNEDY None Planning Agency Minutes March 15, 1982 Page 2 NEW BUSINESS: None STAFF CONCERNS: None AGENCY CONCERNS: None ADJOURNMENT: at 3:13 p.m. to the next regular meeting. j~net Hes~er ~Kecordi ng Secretary James B. Sharp, MINU~S OF A JOINT ADJ~ED ~EG~La~ OF ~ ~DE~ELOP~T ~CY AND ',~ CIT~ CITY OF TJSTIN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way NA~ch 8, 1982 TO O~DE~ The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey at 7:31 p.m. II. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent= Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli Sharp william A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brot~markle, Comm. Dev. Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Ronald Na~lt, Finance Director Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Ed Knight, Associate Planner Alan Warren, Senior Planner Approximately 15 in the audience III. IM)l~i~ I~SC~ ~ STI~ET IMP~T PI~%N The staff report was given by Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer. A large wall sketch was shown which modified the loss of parking from 61 to 28 spaces. Angle parking was addressed but we would only be able to load one side of the street with angle parking. He felt it was necessary to have two lanes of traffic in both directions for future increased traffic. Councilwoman Kennedy asked for a five minute recess in order for the Council and the public to look closer at the sketch. RECESS & The Mayor Pro Tem declared a five minute recess at 7:40 p.m. and reconvened at 7:45 p.m. Walter Flaherty suggested that all parking on E1 Camino and the side streets should be restricted to two hours so that workers and trucks do not monopolize the parking. Doug Gfeller said that his concern was not so much the design of the plan but the implementation of it. The City would be making a com- mittment to spend money for improvements that may have to be torn out if the property is developed and this would be a big waste of money. Councilman Edgar pointed out that the funds are available and the people who live and own businesses on E1 Camino want improvements now and the Council is obligated to advance now. Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey said that the proposed treatment of inter- sections would attract people more than what is between intersec- tions. Councilman Saltarelli thought the whole premise of intruding into the street with landscaping and benches was wrong. People will not be coming to this area to sit around on benches. He was against any intrusions into the street but was in favor of completing the deco- rative work and the sidewalks at each of the intersections. He also was in favor of Mr. Flarety's suggestion of 2 hr. parking. Councilwoman Kennedy asked for any input from the residents of the area. ADJOURNED COUNCIL MEETING Page 2, 3-8-82 Mike Shroup agreed with Mr. Saltarelli that if people wanted a place to sit, they could go to the park that is about a block away. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that staff be directed to proceed with the plans with the following stipulations: 1) The decorative treatment of every intersection, crosswalks and curb returns (including the two end intersections) be as presented on the plans but that the mid-block crossing walks be left as a con- cept to be implemented with the development of that area; 2) Curbs to remain in their existing location with no landscaping encroaching into the streets; 3) Sidewalks to be put back in at the present width with the decorative treatment as planned; and 4) Removal of some trees at each end of E1 Cemino and replacement with flowering trees that are not messy. Councilman Edgar continued that an element of this motion is we will not be committed to the maintenance of a lot of these areas. We are giving the consultant and the staff philosophical direction of what we expect to see. This will result in specific plans that will be approved when we advertise for bids and there will be an opportunity at that time to make slight modifications. Elmer Loy, Tustin Fix-It Shop, asked what the time element was on this. Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, responded that we would advertise for bids on May 17th. Depending on what action is taken, perhaps a maximum of 2 weeks, we would award the bid either the last meeting in June or the first meeting in July. Construction is anticipated to be concluded about the first of November. The motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that if capital improve- ments can be funded through Redevelopment funds, including water improvements, they should be. Mr. Edgar agreed with Mrs. Kennedy that this has been our policy but he felt it needed to be reiterated. Mr. Hoesterey commented that the purpose of Redevelopment is to help rebuild an area and there- fore that money should be used to revitalize the area. Motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. IV. PURPOSE OF ~TING William Huston, City Manager, said that staff would like some gen- eral direction as to what the priorities are for capital improve- ments. He said that Council had received a staff report prepared by Mr. Ledendecker which contains many improvements. It would not be practical to prioritize each project but it would be helpful to know the priorities regarding beautification, traffic, pedestrian safety, undergroundlng, etc. With the statistics to be shown tonight, there is no question that we need a long-term capital improvement financ- ing program. Mr. Huston continued that one of the items on the agenda is the sta- tus of selecting a consultant. We will bring a recommendation to the Council in a few weeks. Mr. Ledendecker indicated in his report that we will soon be soliciting proposals for the engineering analy- sis of the water system. He identified by means of a flip chart available resources through the end of next fiscal year for capital improvements as follows: 1) General Fund - $1,115,372 (Includes Community Center reserve of $571,378}; 2) Revenue Sharing - $292,846; 3) Gas Tax - $215,251; 4) Park Development - <7,365>; 5) Beautification - $91,633; 6) RDA - $245,180; and 6) Water -???. Councilman Saltarelli expressed that with the economic climate we should defer further beautification projects such as center islands and undergrounding and focus on the water system, street signals, interconnect facilities etc. ADJOURNED COUNCIL ME~.TING Page 3, 3-8-82 Councilman Edgar asked staff for more detailed data on the next fis cal year expenditures and revenue. Councilman Hoesterey expressed that our first priority should be public health and safety, including upgrading the water system. He agreed that undergrounding and beautification would not have high priority. Councilwoman Kennedy placed traffic concerns high on the list of priorities. She would be in favor of beautification if it would attract more business to generate more revenue. Councilman Saltarellt said he would not be opposed to a bond issue to accomplish certain identified high priority projects that could be accomplished soon at the cheapest possible price and then pay off the bonds with the increment. Councilman Edgar commented that he was in favor of expending money for storm drain on Prospect, signal at First and Prospect, widening of Prospect street, acquiring additional land for parking needs in the NW, NE and SE downtown areas and for expansion of City Hall, upgrading of the water system particularly on main streets, and problem with drainage on Second Street. He was not in favor of condemning Matt Nisson's property on Red Hill and Walnut at this time. In terms of long-term plans he was in favor of closing in the open storm drain on the north of Main Street/easterly of Newport freeway, widening of Red Hill (southerly of Melvin Way) to the ulti- mate right-of-way, and address some of the traffic needs on 17th Street by having the north side widened to its ultimate right-of-way between Prospect and the Newport Freeway. ADJO~MENT - It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to adjourn at 9~03 p.m. to the next regular meeting on March 15, 1982. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. M~/~S OF A ~ ~KK'r~G OF ~ ~EDE~E~OPMENT ~CY OF · -~ CIT~ OF T~STIN, Ca?.TFO~IA March 15, 1982 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 3:12 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. Agency Members Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None James G. 9~urke, City Attorney William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Co~. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Ronald Nault, Finance Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ken Fleagle, Planning Consultant Royleen White, Community Services DireCtor Fred Wakefield, Captain, Police Department Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 30 in the audience 3. APPROVAL OF MIN~ It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the minutes of the March 1, 1982, regular meeting. Carried 5-0. 4. APPROVAL OF It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve General Demands for the month of February, 1982, in the amount of $38,186.07 as recom- mended by the Director of Finance. Motion carried 5-0. 50 5. BID AI~%~D - aTZ.~ ]~ECOliSTR~'CTI(~ ZI~P~~, P~OJ~CT~ Z, II & III Bids for subject project were received as follows: Porter Construction Company, Santa Ana Sun Paving Company, Santa Ana Five States Plumbing, Orange Hardy & Harper, Inc., Tustin Gillespie Construction, Buena Park California Western, Placentia Fleming Engineering, Inc., Buena Park A. M. Construction, Inc., Whittier R. J. Noble Company, Orange All American Asphalt, Orange Sully-Miller Constracting Company, Orange Excel Paving Company, Long Beach Meyer Constructors, Highland $80,741.58 $86,132.01 $86,153.70 $86,614.16 $89,190.60 $90,801.25 $95,149.12 $95,266.25 $97,927.71 $100,457.15 $102,222.05 $107,685.00 $108,071.30 ~he low bid is 25% below the engineer's estimate of $107,586.40, with $102,000.00 in RDA funds presently budgeted for the projects. As recom- mended in the report dated March 9, 1982, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to award the con- tract for subject project to the low bidder, Porter Construction Company, Inc., Santa Aha, in the amount of $80,741.58. Carried 5-0. 95 6. AG~NC~ ~S - None. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 3:15 p.m. to the next regular meeting on April 5, 1982. Carried 5-0. MIN~S OF A ~u~AR OF '~ ~STIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way M~rch 15, 1982 I ,,, C~T.T. II. I~OT.T. C.aT.n III. P~' 1. IV. P~m'-'rc CO, CEOS 1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 3:15 p.m. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None James G. Rourke, City Attorney william A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Com~. Dev. Director Ken Fleagle, Planning Consultant Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Fred Wakefield, Captain, Police Department Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 30 in the audience P~.aMATIO~ - The Mayor read and ~resented to Scot~ ~karzewski, Red Cross Youth Vol~teer, a procl~ation desi~ating March, ~982, as "Red Cross Month." · r.~ CAT.TFO~IIH, I ,I,K~' ~SO~IATION -- CO~DONINIUM ~v~I~ Rick Horton, President of Californian Tenants' Association, pro- vided an update on the condominium conversion proposal by Cai- State Associates for the Californian Apartments and relayed problems residents are facing as outlined in his letter dated March 2, 1982. Mr. Horton added that aside from cosmetic repairs, no structural repairs are being made. Also, construo- tion on a temporary structure was commenced the week before, with 29 parking spaces removed for a storage area, without City permits. A stop work order was issued by the City, but Mr. Horton reported that work has been continuing on the project out of the public's view. The Community Development Director responded that no tentative map or final map has been filed, therefore, the City is pres- ently dealing with a Use Permit only and utilizing tentative map approval as a mechanism by which to achieve compliance. He con- tinued that if a tenant has a specific problem, it should be reported to the Community Development Department, and an Inspec- tor will be sent out to that unit. That particular unit may then be "piecemeal-improved." Staff has been pressing for sub- mittal of a comprehensive plan for the overall treatment. There is a Relocation Coordinator on-site now. Staff has informed Cal State Associates that any building permit issued, on either all or a portion of the project, constitutes implementation of the conversion. Even though the 120 days on the assistance program does not commence until May 18, when it will be automatic for all tenants, those tenants that would be specifically affected by any building permit would be automatically, immediately eligible for the relocation assistance program because the building permit would supersede the 120-day waiting notice. As part of the Use Permit approval, the relocation plan will auto- matically go into effect on May 18 for all tenants. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 3-15-82 Cal State Associates has been informed by staff that enclosing the garages would be considered a building permit for those tenants whose garages or parking spaces were eliminated and the relocation assistance plan would be implemented for those units immediately, and a stop work order was issued on those building enclosures. A stop work order was not issued for removal of some of the storage units within the parking garages, since it would have been granted regardless of whether a conversion was being considered or not. Normally the map and use permit are coterminous. In this parti- cular case, without a subdivision map the requirement for 120- days' notice of intent to convert is not enforceable until actual commencement of sales is within 120 days. Mr. Horton requested that Council consider implementing a time- table for completion of the conversion. Councilwoman Kennedy suggested that anything that threatens health, safety, or life be checked into and compliance encouraged. The City Attorney stated that under the approval given, the developer is required to file a proposed tenant relocation pur- chase plan with the City. Even though a document entitled "Highlights - Tenant Assistance Program" was filed last week, the developer should file a document with details of the tenant assistance and relocation for consideration by staff and approval by the Council or Planning Agency. Secondly, any waiver of conversion rights being signed by tenants does not have any application. City approval and Ordinance 822 require that anybody who was a tenant at the time of Use Permit approval in January, 1982, is entitled to receive relocation benefits. After further discussion, the City Attorney indicated staff could make available to all tenants copies of the document enti- tled "Highlights" which has been filed with the City. If any tenant has input approving/disapproving same, it should be filed with the Community Development Department. Ultimately, the project must have City approval. First, the developer should provide and identify whatever the complete plan is, provide copies to the tenants, and staff can proceed from there to make a recommendation to the Agency. If and when a final document is filed, the developer can provide tenants with a copy of same. V · C~T.~NDA~ Item 11 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Saltarelli. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAL OF MINU~S - March 1, 1982. 2. APPBOVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $614,612.73. ~ATIFICATI~ OF PAY~Ow-w- in the amount of $96,092.69. 50 3® ~ESOL~TI~ NO. 82-19 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of T~stin, California, ORDERING ~{E CANVASS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 1982, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK Adoption of Resolution No. 82-19 as recommended by the City Clerk. 48 ~SOI~T~ NO. 82-20 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of T~stin, California, SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF ANAHEIM, BUENA PARK, ORANGE, AND OTHER ORANGE COUNTY CITIES AND ORGANIZA- TIONS TO BRING THE SUPER BOWL XX TO ANAHEIM STADIUM Adoption of Resolution No. 82-20 as requested by the City Council. 38 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 3-15-82 10. ~T~ NO. 82-21 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, SUPPORTING RATIFICATION OF THE PERI- PHERAL CANAL REFERENDUM Adoption of Resolution No. 82-21 as requested by the City Council. 107 ~ESO~UT~O~ NO. 82-22 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (EL CAMINO UTILITY UNDER- GROUND DISTRICT NO. 5 CONVERSIONS) Adoption of Resolution No. 82-22 as recommended by the Engi- neering Department. 104 The Director of Public Works responded to Councilman Edgar that this contract provides the conduit for the telephone conversion, and actually has nothing to do with the conductor cable for telephone service; the telephone company will be converting that on their own. Also, staff is waiting for the telephone company to complete the conversion (approximately three weeks) until final accounting notices are sent out. RESO~O~ NO. 82-23 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GEN- ERAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURCHASE CERTAIN ITEMS (POLICE PATROL VEHICLES) (BUDGETED) Approve purchase of six police patrol vehicles at a total purchase price of $54,343.38 and adoption of Resolution No. 82-23 as reco~ended by the Chief of Police. 87 D~IA~ OF CLAIM OF SCOTT a~.-~- Date of Loss: 12-6-81, Filed With City: 2-11-82, Claim No. 82-4 Deny claim of Scott Keeler as recommended by the City Attor- ney. 40 D~IA~ OF ~.~/N OF PEARL ~K~AY - Date of Loss: 12-6-81, Filed With City: 2-11-82, Claim No. 82-5 Deny claim of Pearl Murray as recommended by the City Attor- ney. 40 D~IA~ OF ~.AIM OF PETE~ O~I~ARES- Date of Loss: 12-6-81, Filed With City: 2-11-82, Claim No. 82-6 Deny claim of Peter olivares as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 Consent Cale~d-~ Item No. 11 - Since the City is not a member of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Councilman Saltarelli questioned the necessity of the resolution, which would commit the City to a regional sedimentation program (established by SCAG) and require a great deal of staff time. The City Manager and Director of Public Works provided clarifica- tion, stating that the City is under a State/Federal mandate to comply with the program; a need to increase staff is not envisioned; the program is for the betterment of the regional area; this is being proposed in the form of a resolution in lieu of an ordinance which SCAG has been promoting; and it is more of a voluntary compli- ance and cooperation rather than a stiff, regulatory measure, which may be the ultimate. In response to the Mayor, Councilman Saltarelli stated he would be in favor of the resolution so long as the last paragraph in the resolution is loose enough that the City cannot be forced to create an ordinance unless both the City and the Santa Aha Regional Water .Quality Control Board (RWQCB) agree that the voluntary program is ineffective. The City Manager stated that is the intent. In any case, the item would come back to Council and allow the opportunity to take whatever direction would be appropriate. The resolution merely indicates a statement of intent. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 3-15-82 11. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following resolution as recommended by the Engineering Depart- ment= RESOF~UTIO~ NO. 82-24 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin APP~DVING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE SOUTH COAST AREAWIDE WASTE TREATMENT MANAGEMenT PLAN APPLICABLE TO THE CITY Motion carried 5-0. 107 VI. OI~)IN~/~C~S FOR ]I~TRODUCT~O~ - None VII · ORDI- NANCES FOR ADOPTI~tl 1. O~DINANCE NO. 869 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin REZONING 13681 REDHILL AVENUE FROM R-3 (2700) TO R-3 (1960) It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 869 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following reading of the title by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 869 be passed and adopted. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None None 110 VIII. BUSINESS 1. T~T.T.~R DAYS CO)~I'~-~ ~QUEST Cherill Webb, Tiller Days Chairperson, reported that the com- mittee has looked into a couple of sources for the third power pole. One is the Marine Corps and the other is a private source. Nothing has materialized from either as yet. If neither of the two sources comes through, the Committee needs a commitment from the City because they feel they cannot do the Tiller Days without the third pole and electricity. In response to Councilman Hoesterey, Ms. Webb responded that last year, fuses were blown and circuit breakers went off with the existing equipment, and many booth renters did not have the electricity they needed. In response to the Mayor, the Community Services Director reported that Southern California Edison Company does not get involved in the hardware end. Gene Carter, Southern California Edison, clarified that the pole is not the issue; it's the com- mercial box, wiring, etc., that is expensive, which Edison Com- pany does not handle. Ms. Webb responded to Councilman Hoesterey that 10 of the 25 booths would have to be eliminated, along with the pancake breakfast, if activities are to be accommodated by existing equipment. She added that generators are extremely costly and noisy. In response to Councilwoman Kennedy, the Community Services Director stated that City use of the third pole cannot be justi- fied, even for Fourth of July activities; and Tiller Days is not envisioned as becoming self-supportlng for approximately five years. Following further Council discussion, Council concurred that Councilmembers Edgar and Kennedy meet with Ms. Webb to attempt to reach a solution. 34 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 3-15-82 B~SINESS BID AWARD - RED HILL A~IUE AHFP PBOJECT NO. 1064 Bids for subject project were received as follows: R. J. Noble Co., Orange All American Asphalt, Orange Blair Paving, Inc., Yorba Linda Five States Plumbing, Orange Lee Construction Corp., Mission Viejo Porter Construction Co., Santa Aha Griffith Co., Irvine Sully-Miller Contracting Co., Orange Red Hill Construction Co., Inc., Santa Aha Hardy & Harper, Inc., Tustin Marmon B. J. Gladd Const. Co., Los Angeles $130,964.95 $134,933.33 $136,488.68 $138,063.50 $140,774.79 $142,681.14 $146,919.95 $153,891.30 $156,340.10 $162,405.48 $183,709.10 The low bid is 24.8% below the engineer's estimate of $174,170.30, with $107,800 in gas tax funds budgeted for the City's share of the project. Based on the low bid, the cost split for the project is as follows: City Share County Share Total $ 54,395.93 76,569.02 $130,964.95 AS recommended in the report dated March 9, 1982, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to award the contract for subject project to the low bidder, R. J. Noble Company, Orange, in the total amount of $130,964.95. Motion carried 5-0. 95 2. PAR~J_~G PI~)HIBITIOt~ AT E~ CAMINO ~ & SIXTH S~T The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and reco~endation. Pursuant to his report dated March 10, 1982, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the red zoning of curbs at the intersection of E1 Camino Real at Sixth Street, resulting in a loss of 13 on-street parking spaces, prior to the installation of the forthcoming traffic signal. Carried 5-0. 75 3. ~NIT ~m~ FOR ~Q~TIPLE ~I~ SEli~I,-~,, BX WE ~A',~K METER The City Manager presented the staff report and recommendation and stated that the effective date for the adjusted bi-monthly water usage rates and charges would be April 19, 1982. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following resolution: RESOLU~TO~ NO. 82-25 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of T%lstin, California, ADJUSTING ~3STIN WATER SERVICE RATES Motion carried 5-0. 107 4. DI~%FT O~DINANCE FOR GAME ARCADES The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation. He stated staff recommends approval of the provisions outlined in Alternative II as contained in the report dated March 15, 1982, prepared by the Community Development Department. A question-and-answer period followed. After further Council discussion, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to refer the matter back to the Police Department for input. The Community Development Director reported that the Use Permit moratorium for arcades expires in May. The motion carried 5-0. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 3-15-82 IX. O~R B~SINESS Xe ' CIT~ MANAGER The City Manager stated he has distributed to Council a report on fund balances for the Redevelopment Agency and will answer any Agency questions at the next regular meeting. 2. SIDI~%LK CO~DITTfH~ AT ~ ~TT.T. & ~T Councilman Saltarelli stated he has received citizen complaints regarding the dilapidated condition of the asphalt sidewalk at Red Hill and Walnut. He requested that staff look into the matter. 92 3. ~IOR CITX~-~iS AD~ISOI~ COUNCIL Councilman Hoesterey reported that the California League of Cities, Orange County Division, unanimously appointed Ruby May as a voting delegate to the Orange County Senior Citizens Advi- sory Council as recommended by the City Council. 28 4. Mf~ITORING OF S~ATE PUNDING Councilman Hoesterey provided a report of some current State funding cutbacks. He suggested that staff monitor the State's actions as the City goes into the budgetary process, that unfunded State mandates be identified, and that list be provided to the League of' Cities so it can be combined with those of other cities and lobbying commenced to get them removed. The City Manager indicated staff would provide such a list at the next regular meeting. 29 5. Councilwoman Kennedy inquired if there was a problem with the Dial-A-Ride program, as she has received citizen concerns that the system has been changed, they are no longer using two-way radios, etc. The Director of Public Works stated he would look into the matter and report back. 10~ 6 · S~aI~TROM D~VELOPI4~T The M~yor inquired about the time schedule for the Segerstrom Development on Newport. Staff responded that it would be opti- misti~ if it reaches completion in 1983-84. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to adjourn at 4:37 p.m. in memory of Walter P~wlings to the next regular meeting on April 5, 1982. Carried 5-0. 84