Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 03-15-82MI~u-r~ OF A ~u~%l~ ~TING OF THE TOSTIN CITX COUNCIL CHAbIB E RS 300 Centennial Way ~ch 1, 1982 I- CALL TO O~DER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey at 4:19 p.m. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli Sharp James G. Rourke, City Attorney william A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Com. Dev. Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Judl Ormsby, Recreation Supervisor Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 15 in the audience The Council recessed at 4:20 p.m. for set-up of the following pre- sentation. The meeting was reconvened at 4:26 p.m. with Mayor Sharp absent. III. S~TATIO~ 1. I~. Pu~hIC C~CE~NS None. O1U~NGE COONT~ ~ATER DISTRICT- PEBXP~m~AL CANa?. Gordon Elser, Information Officer, Orange County Water District, gave a slide presentation on the Peripheral Canal Project and requested Council's suppor~ of Proposition 9 which includes the Peripheral Canal as well as other facilities. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to agendize a resolution in sup- port of Proposition 9 for the March 15 meeting. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 107 V. CO~S~T C~T.~DAR It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. APPROVAL OF ~I~u'rmS - February 16, 1982. APP~0~L OF DEMANDS in the amount of $172,582.57. R~IFICA~O~ OF PA~I~L in the amount of $96,820.85. 50 I~E~OLO~ NO. 82--5 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR ANI- MAL SHELTER AND ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES Adoption of Resolution No. 82-5 as recommended by the City Attorney. 23 I~SOI~FI~O~ NO. 82-16 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS AND POLLING PLACES, APPOINTING PRECINCT BOARD MEMBERS AND FIXING COMPENSATION FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 1982, HERETOFORE CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 81-142 OF THE CITY COUNCIL Adoption of Resolution No. 82-16 as recommended by the City Clerk. 48 cITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 3-1-82 Se IIESOI~TIO~ NO. 82--17- A Resolution of the City Council of t_he City of Tustin, California, AUTHORIZING AND DIPd~CTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND SIGN AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES Adoption of Resolution No. 82- 17 as reco~nended by the Personnel Director · 79 ~ FOR ~ ~aL- 14681 Emer~d Removal of two parkway trees in front of 14681 Emerywood with no replacement of the one near the fire hydrant and the other one to be replaced with a tree from the City-approved list, selected by Mrs. Black, as recomended by the City Engineer · 86.1 I~ BOULEVARD FED~r. an u~u~N (FAU) PBOJECT Authorize the Mayor to execute Program Supplement No. 3 to Local Agency/State Agreement No. 07-5271. 45 8. D~IAL OF ~T~OF GEOB~E EDWARDS - Date of Loss: 11-2-81, Filed With City: 1-15-82, Claim No. 82-2 Deny claim of George Edwards as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 9. NOMINATIO~ OF ~u~x MAY TO VOTING ~MBE~/P ~ ORANGE CO~]F~ S~IORCITI'A~8 ADFISO~X ~O~NCIL Recommended to direct staff to prepare a letter to the Orange County Division, League of Cities, recommending Ruby May as a voting m~mher to the Orange County Senior Citizens Advisory Council, authorize the Mayor to sign this letter, and authorize and encourage Councilmem%bers to voice their support for Mrs. May to appropriate League officials. 28 10. ~OLUTIO~ NO. 82-18 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING THE BAIL SCHEDULE FOR TUSTIN CITY CODE VIOLATIONS Adoption of Resolution No. 82-18 as recommended by the Police Chief. 82 VI. ONOINANCES FOR INT~ODUCTI~ - None VIZ. O~I- NAN(ES FOR 1. O~DINANCE NO. 868 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING UNDERGBDUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 6, IRVINE BOULEVARD, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONVERSION It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 868 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. Following reading of the title by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 868 be passed and adopted. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None Sharp 104 VIII · O~D BUSINESS 1- DAYS CO~-~TEE ~EQUEST The City Manager presented the staff report and recommendation. In response tO Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey, the City Manager stated the pole would supplement the two poles available through the School District for activities after the parade, not strictly for night activities. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 3-1-82 In response to Councilman Edgar, the City Manager and Recreation Supervisor responded that set-up of the pole would be handled by the School District. Council discussion followed regarding the amount of use the third pole would have, and the possibility of passing some of the costs on to booth renters. The Mayor Pro Tern recognized Margaret Byrd in the audience, who stated that some people do not rent booths due to the present rental rate. The Recreation Supervisor noted that the booth rental rate is $75.00 with the number of booths at appro~4mately 40. She noted that Cherrill Webb would be available at the evening session. The City Manager suggested that Council continue the matter to the next meeting, with staff to report on possible uses for the equz[pment and a payback schedule through a surcharge on the booths. The Director of Finance interjected that the total City contribution in two years has been $12,000 plus an addi- tional $300-$400 annually for insurance coverage. Prior to that, the City contributed approximately $2,500. In three years, the City has not received any return on that investment. Council concurred to continue the matter to March 15, 1982. 34 IX. NEW BUSINESS X. OT~a BUSINESS uum~TAL APPBOPPJ~%TIO~ - PUBCHAb'E OF PQLICE DEPA.q~TM~T TAPES The City Manager presented the staff report and recommendation. As recommended in the memo dated February 24, 1982, prepared by the City Manager, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to authorize supplemental appropriation of $5,100 from the General fund unrestricted balance for the purchase of 100 tapes to be used in the taping of police communications. Motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 82 2. SIG~ CODE E~r~TZ0~ - ~uuKa SAFINGS, 1095 IR~ZNE ~O~LE~ARD The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation. Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the report dated March 1, 1982, it was moved by Saltarelll, sec- onded by Kennedy, to approve the request from Mercury Savings for a 4 sq. ft. sign (8'x6"). Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 93 1. CITY The City Manager announced the following public meetings: March 2, Costa Mesa City Hall, 7:00 p.m., for the North-South Central Corridor Study; March 18, Irvine High School; and March 16, Mission Viejo High School, for the Foothill Corridor Route Location Study. Staff is monitoring the items and will make periodic reports to Council. In response to Councilman Saltarelli, the Community Development Director clarified that the policy to schedule public hearings of great interest or not of a routine nature for the evening session applies to ~he Planning Agency, and Council policy is that all public hearing items are to be scheduled for 7:30 p.m. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, that fairly rou- tine City Council public hearings be scheduled for the afternoon meetings, and if a significant number of people are interested in the hearing, it can be continued to the evening session. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 3-1-82 Councilwoman Kennedy stated she could not support the motion and suggested the matter be tabled pending the proposed foundation of the Planning Com~ission after the April election. She continued that 75% of the population works, and it is difficult for those who do work to monitor Council action. Councilman Hoesterey stated that there are some public hearing items that carry a great deal of public interest and public input, and there are things covered in p~%blic hearings that appear to be fairly routine. Following fu~cher discussion, the motion carried 3-1, Kennedy opposed, Sharp absent. 83 3. Sum~K BO~L ~1~ AN~IM STAD~u~ It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to agendize a resolution in support of a future Super Bowl being held at Ana- heim Stadium. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 38 4. R~ CUR~ING (~ EL CAll'lO ~ In response to Councilman Edgar's comments regarding red curbing at Sixth Street and E1 Camino Real, the Director of Public Works reported that staff does have a red curb plan which was to be implemented with the signal installation. He indicated that staff can proceed with the red curbing prior to signal installa- tion, and suggested that Council review same. Council concurred to agendize the plan for review. 92 5. ANNEXATI~ SUrVeY- IRVINE/WASS Following consideration of the report dated February 23, 1982, prepared by Dr. R. K. Fleagle, Planning Consultant, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelti, to authorize staff to conduct an opinion survey of the Ir~ine/Wass area to determ-%ne if an annexation proposal is feasible for subject area. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 24 XI. ~ESS- ~v~ING It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to recess at 5~06 p.m. to the 7:30 p.m. evening session. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. CITY COUNC~, ~ETING 7:30 P.M. I o C,I~?-?- TO O~DE]~ The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp aC 7:34 p.m. Councllpersons Present= Councilpers6ns Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Com. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Charles Thayer, Police Chief Approximately 25 in the audience III. PUblIC COnCErNS None · CITY COUNCIL ~NU~ES Page 5, 3- 1-82 IV. P~'~-?C 1. V. OTHER BUSINESS 1. 2e ZO~IE ~NGE NO. 82-1 - 13681 ~ wrr.T. AF~iOE OI~INANCE NO. 869 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ~ZONING 13681 REDHILL AVENUE FROM R-3 (~900) TO R-3 ( 1960 ) Mike Brotem~rkle, community Development Director, reported that this Zone Change was requested by the applicant and involves 4 lots north of San Juan on the west side of Red Hill. This change would permit him to build a fourplex instead of a tri- plex. Based upon the square footage proposed, the 2 ~paces per u/%it is sufficient parking. This Zone Change is within the General Plan. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:39 p.m. There being no com- ments or objections, it was closed by the Mayor. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 869 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Follow- ing the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 869 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to intro- duce Ordinance No. 869. Motion carried 5-0. 110 JOI~T .ms~.~,,cv.~PM~TT Ac~CY ~ND ~ C~CIL ~r~NG The City Manager reminded the Council of the joint Redevelopment Agency and City Council meeting on March 8, 1982 at 75~0 p.m. in the Council Chambers. I~COGNITIO~ OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Councilwoman Kennedy recognized students School Civic class. from the Tustin High It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 7:41 p.m. to the joint Adjourned Redevelopment Agency and ~ity Coun- cil meeting on March 8, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the coUnCil Cham- bers and thence to the next regular meeting on March 15, 1982. MAYOR CITY CLE P-K