HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 3 CLAIM #81-14 05-03-82DATE:
TO:
FROM:
S UB,~ Er-T:
April 20, 1982
CONSENT CALENDAR
Inter-Corn
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
JAMES G. ROURKE, CITY ATTORNEY
CLAIMANT: HILL, David
CLAIM NO: 81-14
D/L: 3/6/81 FILED W/CITY: 6/5/81
CARL WARREN FILE NO: 29177 RR
After investigation and review it is recommended
that the above-referenced claim be denied and the City Clerk
directed to give proper notice of the denial to the claimant
and to the claimant's attorney.
JGR:se
Enclosure
1. Copy of Claim
cc: OCCRMA
?
8
10
12
17
18
20
21
23
24
25
27
25
TOLEDANIO & CHAi~NLEY
BELOW FOE FLING ST~-MP ONLY)
Attorneys for
Claimant
DAVID HILL,
Claimant,
vs.
CITY OF TUSTIN and
COUNTY OF ORANGE,
Respondents'.
CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES/
WRONGFUL ARREST/WRONGFUL IMPRISONMENT
(Government Code §900)
Claimant, DAVID HILL, hereby makes the following claim
against the City of Tustin and the County of Orange pursuant to
appropriate sections of California Government Code:
1. On or about March 6, 1981, Claimant was arrested in
front of his house located on Surbanas Way in the City of Santa
Ana, County of Orange, State of California. The arrest and
subsequent detention of Claimant was made by the Tustin Police
Department and the Orange County Sheriff's Department.
2. Claimant is informed and believes, and based upon
such information and belief alleges that the arrest and subsequent
detention of his person by the above captioned respondents was
illegal, unlawful, and was not based upon probable cause.
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
3. -'~I'ne actions of respondents,_ and each of ~'~n~,.,~ were
willful, wanton, reckless, careless and negligent in that officers
for the City of Tustin Police Department and the Orange County
Sheriff's Office failed to properly investigate the facts and
circumstances surrounding the crimes and complaints which allegedly
infolved Claimant.
4. As a sole, direct and proximate result of the actions
of respondents, and each of them, as hereinabove alleged, Claimant
was caused to be falsely and wrongfully incarcerated, on or about
March 6, 1981 until March 13, 1981, all to his general damages in
the sum of $25,000.00.
5. As a further sole, direct and proximate result of
the actions of respondents, and each of them, Claimant was caused
to lose employment to his general damage in the sum of $5,000.00.
6. As a further sole, direct and proximate result of
the actions of respondents, and each of them, Claimant was caused
to pay a bail bondsman the sum of $110.00.
Claimant by way of the foregoing, hereby claims damages
as follows:
1.
2.
$110.00.
General damages in the sum of $25,000.00.
Lost earnings in the sum of $5,000.00.
Loss of money paid to bail bondsman in the sum of
NOTE: Ail further correspondence and notices following
the presentation of this claim should be sent to the following.
Richard L. Charnley, Attorney at Law, Toledano & Charnley, 2212
Dupont Drive, Suite D, Irvine, California 92715.
DATED: June 4, 1921.
RICHARD L. CHARNLEY, Attorney
for Claimant
- 2 -