Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCALIFORNIAN APARTMENTS 5-3-82DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 28, 1982 Inter-Corn HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL JAMES G. ROURKE, CITY ATTORNEY CALIFORNIAN APARTMENTS, CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION, RELOCATION AND PURCHASE PLAN Staff met with representatives of Cal State Associates regarding their Relocation and Purchase Plan. In this conference various portions of the proposed Relocation and Purchase Plan were pointed out to Cal State representatives as not being in conformity with the requirements of Tustin City Code Section 9274. The developers agreed to revise the plan in those particulars and have now submitted a revised plan, corrected in the particulars with which we had concerns. It is our opinion that their revised Relocation and Purchase Plan conforms to the requirements of Tustin City Code with one possible exception. Tustin City Code Section 9274e(4) provides as follows: Tenant Relocation - Purchase Provisions: The applicants shall give written notice to all tenants ten (10) days prior to the date of all public hearings relating to the condominium conversion application. All persons who are tenants at the time of City approval of a conversion shall be given a notice of intent to convert of one hundred and twenty (120) days prior to the date of conversion and the right to purchase exercisable within sixty (60) days in accordance with State law. The applicant shall submit a tenant relocation/purchase plan containing at least the following: Assistance to each person who is a tenant at the time of City approval of the conversion and who remains a tenant for one hundred and twenty (120) days thereafter or until the sooner issuance of building permits, and to each person who becomes a tenant after City approval and who is not given written notice of the intended conversion by the developer before becoming a tenant, as follows: To each such person desiring to relocate, a cash amount equal to twice the last months rent paid or a minimum amount of six hundred dollars ($600), whichever is greater. Rent reduction or waiver may be included for consideration. In no case shall rents be raised following approval of any tentative map or use permit. (a) The Cal State Relocation and Purchase Plan provides its benefits on a per unit basis, and not on a per tenant basis. While the literal language of this section would appear to require that a payment of the specified amounts must be made to each tenant, logic, reason and analysis of the facts regarding condominium conversions clearly indicates that the required benefits were intended to be on a per unit basis. The Relocation and Purchase Plan submitted by Cal State clearly limits the benefits to a per unit basis. While staff does not disagree with the reasonableness of those provisions in the proposed Relocation and Purchase Plan, we feel it is necessary for the Council to determine its intentions concerning whether the benefits are to be on a per unit basis or a per tenant basis. In other words, is it the Council's intention that (a) the benefits are to be on a per tenant basis or (b) on a per unit basis with the benefits divided among all the persons who are tenants of the unit? It is Staff's belief that the Council's intention was the latter, but that is a determination to be made by the City Council. Other than for the issue of whether the benefits are on a per tenant or per unit basis, Staff finds the proposed Purchase and Relocation Plan as revised and resubmitted to be a satisfactory plan and in conformity with the requirements of Tustin City Code and recommends approval. JGR:cas:D:4/28/82:D -2-