HomeMy WebLinkAboutP.C. MINUTES 06-07-82TUSTIN PLANNING AGENCY
Minutes of Regular Meeting
June 7, 1982
The Planning Agency held a regular meeting Monday, June 7, 1982, at
3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 300 Centennial
Way, Tustin, California.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Edgar at 3:01 p.m.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Greinke and the invocation was
given by Chairman Edgar.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Edgar, Saltarelli, Kennedy, Hoesterey, Greinke
None
Also present:
William Huston, City Manager
Michael Brotemarkle, Community Development Director
James Rourke, City Attorney
Janet Hester, Recording Secretary
MINUTES
The minutes of the regular m~eting held May 17, 1982, were approved as
submitted.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Use Permit 82-10
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
All American Sign Service
14722 Newport Avenue
Authorize 50 square foot pole sign
Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report and informed the Agency he
had received a phone call from Mr. Jori Harrison, president, Sycamore
Gardens Homeowners Association, expressing opposition to approval of
the request. He indicated he felt the sign was not in keeping with
the residential character of the neighborhood and, that if approved,
the sign should not be internally illuminated.
The Public Hearing was opened at 3:04 p.m. Hearing no one, Chairman
Edgar closed the Public Hearing at 3:04 p.m.
Mr. Saltarelli moved approval of Use Permit 82-[0 by the adoption of
Resolution 2034. Mr. Hoesterey seconded.
Mrs. Kennedy requested the applicant be sensitive to the nearby
residential area when lighting the sign.
Motion carried: 5-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
EDGAR, SALTARELLI, KENNEDY, HOESTEREY
GREINKE
None
None
2. Use Permit 82-11
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Toni Crist
14191 Newport Avenue
Authorize 49 square foot pole sign
After Mr. Brotemarkle .presented the staff report, the public hearing
was opened at 3:08 p.m.
Ms. Crist presented herself to the Agency for questions.
The Public Hearing was closed at 3:11 p.m.
Planning Agency Minutes
June 7, 1982
Page 2
Mr. Greinke moved to approve Use Permit 82-11 by the adoption of
Resolution No. 2036. Mr. Saltarelli seconded.
Motion carried: 5-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
EDGAR, SALTARELLI, KENNEDY, HOESTEREY
GREINKE
None
None
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
None
OLD BUSINESS:
None
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Extension of Use Permit 81-9
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Dale Cexton & Associates on behalf of Beyer & Warden
15520-15582 South "B" Street
To extend Variance 81-9 for a period of six (6) months
by amending Resolution No. 2011
Mr. Saltarelli moved approval of the extension of Use Permit 81-9 by
the amendment of Resolution No. 2011. Chairman Edgar seconded.
Motion carried: 5-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
2.
EDGAR, SALTARELLI, KENNEDY, HOESTEREY,
GREINKE
None
None
Master Sign Plan for Fireman's Fund
Planning Agency Minutes
June 7, 1982
Page 4
Mr. Rourke, City Attorney, stated that the Agency was not obligated to
approve the request and it would be appropriate to approve the
Resolution as written, with the deed restriction and prohibition of
cooking facilities.
Mr. Greinke stated he felt the deed restriction was necessary, but
perhaps permitting temgorary kitchen facilities would allow Mr.
Ferguson to live comfortably while renovating his home, but would
discourage later use of the unit as a rental.
Mrs. Kennedy requested that staff set up a separate, easily accessible
file, to keep track of requests such as this and make them easier to
monitor.
Mr. Hoesterey moved approval of Use Permit 82-8 by the adoption of
amended Resolution 2030 allowing ten~orary kitchen facilities and a
required one-year review period. Mr. Edgar seconded.
Mr. Wright requested that the review period be extended to eighteen
(18) months. He felt that it would take at least five-six months to
complete the garage and because of the extensive nature of the
renovation, one year would not be sufficient.
OF 'm~ ~]L'~Z, OLON~i? ~-~ (~'
qq:m r'T,~L' C~' '~S'.r.3.d,
JGne 7, 1982
1. ~?:r. 'ZO 0~)~
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Edgar at 3:17 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
2 -~ ]~IT.T.
AgenCy M~mhers Present:
Agency M~-hers Absent:
others Present:
3. AEr~c~OgXT. OF~
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelll
None
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
M~ke Brotamarkle, C~. Dev. Director
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Ronald Naul=, Finance Di=ec=or
Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director
Royleen White, C~unity Services Director
Approximately 10 in the a~%ence
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the minutes of
May 17, 1982. Carried 5-0.
4. ~PO~'~A~=~C ~G~L AT~XN A~D "Ba ~
Bob Ledendecker, C~ty Engineer, repoz~ced that this Intersect£on missed
meeting the warrant requirements by 75% and he recommended t_hat no action
be taken.
Councilwc~an Kennedy repoz"ced that she had s~ent s~me time on Main Street
and was ~ed a= ~e ~avel s~eds ~d she re~es~ ~forc~= by ~e
Police De~r~nt. ~yor ~g~ ~in~ed ~t ~at staff has recorded in
~e ~s= ~a= ~e 25 mph l~t ~ ~g~ ~ 35 m~ ~ ~a= rad~ co~d ~
It was moved by Saltarellt, seconded by Hoesterey, that no action be taken
at this t/me and that another traffic sux~ey be taken when construction at
that corner is completed. Carried 5-0. 94
~Q~U~ ~O. ~ 82-4 - A Resolution of the Tustin Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
EL CAM_TNO REAL/MAIN STREET IF~PROVEM~NTS AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
The City Engineer reported that the number of parking spaces are staying
the s~- and that there are no areas projecting out into the street. The
plans will be complete in a few days and construction should be completed
in mid November. He introduced Mr. Fisher, the consultant.
Mr. Fisher, consultant, explained that the landscape improvements consist
of paving (brick look alike) texture that will have a slight coarseness
but would not prohibit pushing strollers. There will be planting at the
bus stops with benches, newspaper racks and bicycle racks. The Pine trees
atthe South end of the project will be replaced with flowering trees. The
Fleck'trees willbe pruned as well as-putting in a bemrier~oroot~ break-
ing the sidewalk. We will put iron tree gates around the =ree~ wells.
There will be general upgrading to the landscaping but not as much as in
the first plans submitted. Most of the concrete paving will be replaced
an~ any drainage problems will be addressed.
Councilman Greinke reported t.hat the Historical Society has asked for a
bench in front of their establishment to draw attention to their office.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, to adopt Resolution No. RDA
~EDEVELOPMENT ~ENCY MINUTES
Page 2, 6-7-82
In response to Councilman Hoesterey's desire to see the final proposal,
Mr. Ledendecker suggested that he could bring a set of plans that would be
98% complete to the evening meeting.
Councilwoman Kennedy withdrew her motion and moved, seconded by'Greinke,
to continue this ite~ to the 7:30 p.m. meeting. Carried 5-0. 95
7e
Mr. Greinke asked the City Attorney to explain his position on the
Redevelopment Agency.
Attorney P~urke explained that Mr. Greinke did not went to be in a
position where he could not acquire., property in the Redevelopment Agency
areas. As long as the City Council has, by majority action, established
itself as the body of the Redevelopment Agency, Mr. Greinke is
automatically a member. The only o~her alternative would be for the
Council to appoint residents of the City as the governing board, none of
whom could be Councilpersons. In the case of Mr. schuster, when he was a
Councilperson, he understood that he could not acquire any property in the
Redevelopment Agency. He already owned property in the Redevelopment
Agency and he chose to not participate, even though he was a m-mher. Mr.
Greinke could choose to not participate.
Mr. Greinke stated that he would serve on the 9~development Agency as a
par~icipating m-~er. 81
~T- It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn
to the 7:30 p.m. meeting of the Redevelopment Agency.
Carried 5-0.
OF ~
~ CIT~ ~ ~STIN, (~'r. TYO~IA
June 7, 1982
7:30 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by--Chairman Edgar at 8:06 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
2. ~ ~]i.T.T.
Agency M-mhers Present:
Agency M~ers Absent:
O~hers Present:
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy
Saltarelli
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
Mike Brotem~rkle, C~. Dev. Director
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Ronald Nault, Finance Director
Charles Thayer, Chief of Police
Approximately 10 in the audience
C0~IN~D FB0~ ~O~ ~ETING
~~ NO. ~A 82-4 - A 92solution of the Tustin Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Tustin, California, APPP~VING PLANS AND S~ECIFICATIONS FOR
EL CAMINO REAL/MAIN STREET IMPROVE~TS AND DIP~CTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
A Recess was declared at 8:07 p.m. to review plans.
The Redevelopment Agency reconvened at 8:21 p.m.
It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to. ad0pt...Res~lution No.
RDA 82-4.
REDEVELOPMenT A~3ENCY MINUTES
Page 3, 6-7-82
Mr. Hoesterey requested tha= ~he ~o=£on be amended ~ha~ ~he Redevelopment
Agency review ~he ~ype Of trees that would go in at the North and Sou~h
ends of E1 Camino Real.
The motion was amended by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt Reso-
lution No. RDA 82-4 and =hat ~he Redevelopment Agency would review the
type of ~rees that go in at the North and South ends of E1 Camino
Carried 4-0, Saltarelli absent. 95
AD~O~I~L~T- I= was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to adjourn
to a Workshop to review status of Sou~h/Central Redevelop-
ment Project Area and to the nex~ regular meeting on June
21, 1982. Carried 4-0, S<arelli absent.
COUNCIL CHAM~ERS
300 Centennial Way
J~ne 7, 1982
III ·
1.
Councilpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Edgar,. Greinke, HoestereY, Kennedy,
Saltarellt
None
James G. Rou~ke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Mike Brote~arkle, Co~a. Dev. Director
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director
Ronald Nault, Finance Director
RDyleen White, Con~aunity Services Director
Approximately 10 in the audience
"PARES aND ~C~ATI~ t4~'~B"
Mayor Edgar read and presented to Royleen White, Director of
C~unity Services for the City of Tustin, a proclamation
proclaiming the month of June, 1982, as "Parks and Recreation
Month o" 84
None
V.
C~T.~DA~ Councilman Greinke asked that Itam No. 2 be removed from the Consent
to
Calendar. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Sal~arelli,
approve the Consent Calenan~ except for Item No. 2. Carried 5-0.
1. APPROVAL ~ ~- May 17, 1982
4e
Se
7e
Authorize the Mayor to sign and implament the subject agree-
ment for unifom service and laundry as recomended by the
Engineering Department. 45
V~'t.~a~: ~-11-82; A~D ~ riO. 82-8
Deny claim of Keith Murphy as recomended by the City
Attorney. 4Q
Dl~iTar. ~ C~ (]~ B&~ .~O frrTna~1 DA~E C~' LO6S: 1--2-82;
DA~E =-,-igtt 4-9,-82; AND Cr.,AZ~ NO. 82-12
Deny claim of Barbara Jo Gilbert as reconm~ended by the City
Attorney. 40
DEli'Tar. C~' Cr~J.M 0~ ~ r,. D&~"ZS; DAq~ ~ LOSS: 4-21-82;
DAZE F12,ED: 4-23-82; AND Cr.,AZM NO.: 82-14
Deny claim of Arthur L. Davis as recommended by the City
Attorney. 40
D~ZAL Gig' r~r.aTM GE' ADm'.r.A M. BAz, zsK; DAZE C~' LO~: 4-21-82;
DAZE r.,.z='~: 4-3G--82; A~D ~ NO. 82-15
Deny claim of Adella M. Baker as reco.~-ended by the City
Attorney. 40
Dm;ZAT., (~' C[~J.M C~' &~RBARA L. FRAZM; DA~ ~ LOSS: 4-14-82;
DA~ FILED: 4-30-82; ~ f~'.AZM NO. 82-16
Deny claim of Barbara L. Fraim as reco~nended by ~he City
Attorney. 40
CITY ~0UNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 6-7-82
9e
~SOLUTI~ NO. 82--38- A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, APPROVING ~HE APPLICATION FOR GRANT
FUNDS UNDER THE ROBERTI-Z'BEBG URBAN OPEN-SPACE AND RECREATION
PROGRAM
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-38 as reco~ended by the
Director of Community Services. 45
10.
~SOX~ NO. 82-39- A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of T~stin APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 10300 (14882-14942
Newport Avenue )
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-39 as recommended by the
reunify Development Department. 99
11.
~-rlO~ NO. 82-40- A 9~solution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, A~PROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 HANDICAPPED RAMP CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-40 as recon~nended by the Engi-
neering Department. 92
12. ~E~T FOR ~T~I~ pA~nl~G - 15910 Pa~AD~A AF~mu~
Authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-street
parking on the easterly side of Pasadena Avenue adjacent to
15910 Pasadena Avenue and that warnings be issued in lieu of
citations for the first 30 days after the sign installation.
75
CO~S~T C~-~DA~ I~ NO. 2
2. A~NFAL (~ DEMANDS in the amount of $471,685.53
~A~IFICA~ ~ PAXl%0~ in the amount of $93,575.13
5O
Councilman Greinke's concern was about any possible conflict of
interest. He is waiting for a written decision. His business
services many accounts in Tustin and it is difficult to know who
all of them are. Also his monthly expense allowance that is
listed on Page 5 of the warrants has the name of his business
which should not be listed.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to approve Item
No. 2 of the Consent Calendar. Carried 4-0, Grelnke abstained.
VI. O~INANC~S FOR IN~O~CT~O~ - None
FOR ~DOPTXCI~ - None
VIII.
~$~mm~S 1.
IX. N~
~SINE~ ~.
Following consideration of the re~ort dated June 7, 1982, pre-
pared by the Co-~u~ity Development Director, it was moved by
'Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, that Arcades shall be subject
to review and action u~der a use permit procedure by the Plan-
ning Agency only and that the g~idelines be used for information
for the public. Carried 5-0. 81
PI~O.~CT W~-~023 (2)
RESOI~F~ NO. 82--43- A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR IRVINE BLVD. FAU PROJECT M-M023 (2) AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK ~D ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
In response to Councilman Saltarelli's question, the City Engi-
neer responded that this total contract includes traffic signal
control and the median ins~allation with minimal landscaping.
The medians will be entirely paved except in the vicinity of the
trees and within that vicinity there will be a square of
approximately 14' by 14' low maintenance ground cover.
Councilman Saltarelli suggested modifying this contract to
include replacing grass with stamped concrete in the present
islands from Newport Avenue to Prospect.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 6-7-82
Bob Ledendecker said ~hat we were ~oing to do ~he area westerly
on Irvine where we are putting in two left turn ~ockets under
the bid as a special negotiated item. If Council desires to
expand ~his further, he suggested that once we receive the bid,
we can come back with costs on a street by st=eat basis.
It wes ~oved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, ~o reject all
bids for subject project which were received on May ~0, ~982,
and to ~ass and adopt Resolution No. 82-43. Motion carried 5-0.
95
~nis item is a recap of the Stage 2 Alternatives Analysis of ~he
Santa And Transportation Corridor Study. When the study was
initiated, the freeway was pro~ose~ to be widened to 8 lanes to
a medium standard. It would not have the 30' median between ~he
two directions of travel or the full 15' of side clearance to
structures but t. hey would attempt to place the 8 lanes ~s much
as possible within ~he existing right of way, working on reduced
side clearances to have the most ~inimal impact on the
cor~unities. Since that t/me the Orange County Traffic
C~ssion has suggested w~dening ~he freeway =o 10 lanes to a
full standard with 5 lanes in each direction. This would have a
large impact on the co~nu~ity. In reviewing this, staff has 3
major concerns: l) A Clarification should be made as to
whether the Foothill and Eastern Corridor studies have been
considered concurrently with the SATC Study and, if ~hey have
not been, perhaps ~he ~rojeoted needs within the SATC can be
down-s¢oped; 2) Widening of the I-5 Preeway to eight or ten
lanes at ~l~um or full standards will greatly impact Tustin
with respec~ to right of way requirements. A substantial ~mount
of housing units will be =emoved from the con,unity along with
many commercial and industrial buildi~gs which will have an
adverse economic impact to the City; and 3 ) Any elevated rail
and busway alternatives within the transit element would effect
the co~nunity with respect to noise and visual/quality
aesthetics ·
Et was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to au~horize
staff ~o forward the City's concerns regarding the Santa Ana
Transportation Corridor Study as outlined in It~-~ No. 1, 2 and
3 of t21e staff report dated June l, ~982, ~o the Orange County
Transportation Cvmission and the Orange County Transit
District. Carried 5-0.
In response to Mayor EdgarJs concerns abou~ lack of landscaping
and beautification of the freeways that go through Tustin, Mr.
Huston said that staff would ~ransmit our concerns in a letter.
Mrs. Kennedy re~orted that there are many weeds at the inter-
change of I-5§ and I-$.
RESOLUTION NO. 82-42 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of T~st~n, ADOPTING A HOME MORTGAGE FINANCE PP~GRAM IN
COOPERATION WI~H THE COUNTY OF OP~NGE.
M/ke Brot~markle., Co~m~unity Develolanent Director, reported that
the Orange County Home Mortgage Finance Program presents an
Opportunity to make affordable units wi~h iow-cost financing
available in Tustin, with no administrative burden on the City.
The project is strictly to provide mortgages for people who wish
to gain entry into the housing market. Mark Ainslee has
indicated an interest in obtaining the money for his project at
~082-~02 San Juan. Any project ~hat would be approved for
these funds would have to obtain a Use Permit frc~ the City of
Tustin and conform to our standards.
Et was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt
Resolution No. 82-42 and to authorize the ~ayor to execute a
cooperative agreement between the County of Orange and the City
CITY COUNCIL ~vLINUTES
Page 4, 6-7-82
of Tustin, subject to City Attorney approval. Carried 5-0. 81
1. PO~A~
IMPACT
Received and filed.
43
2. SETTING DA't'~t IN ~)GET ~BW ~ZOt~
A Workshop was set for June 17th at 4:00 p.m. Further workshops
will be d~scussed at the evening meeting. 29
Xl.
Mr. Huston reminded the Council of ~he Executive Session for
labor negotiations following the afternoon meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy reported a co~plaint about the standing
water at the new condc~iniums on First Street.
The City Engineer sa/d he would look into it.
3. COI~I~iDA't~OB
Counc~l,~n Greinke co~ended staff for resolution of a tree
proble~ wi~h one of his neighbors.
Mayor Edgar stated he was in agreement with extending the time
for the Columbus Tustin Task Force but requested that they
establish their own deadlines with periodic reports to the
Council.
5. UPDAtinG SI~S
Mayor Edgar asked staff to investigate updating the City's popu-
lation on signs coming into the City and Councilman Hoesterey
commented that the freeway signs showing the City limits should
be updated.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to adjourn
at 4:23 p.m. to an Executive Session for labor negotia-
tions and thence to the 7:30 p.m. meeting. Carried.
~ '~'$-.n,.d CITE
COUNCIL
300 Centennial Way
June 7, 1982
7:30 P.M.
TO O~ER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 8:23 p.m.
Councllpers6ns Present=
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, F~nnedy
Saltarelli
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
M~ke Brotemarkle, C~. Dev. Director
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Charles Thayer, Chief of Police
P~n Nault, Finance Director
Approximately 20 in the audience
C~TY COUNCIL M-~IUES
Page 5, ~-7-82
None
~ 1.
~xr.m,iT)an lQ.
3=30
G~I~u~I. PLaN At.IDleST 82-1 (A)
P.~SC~,U'~C~ NO. 82-41 - A ~esol~t/.on of ~e ~y ~ci$ of ~e
~ty of ~-, ~G ~ ~D~T ~ ~E ~ USE ~T
OF ~E G~ P~ ~R P~R~S AT 17311 & 173431 ~ F~D~
S~T
The staff report was given by Mike Brot~markle, Cuam~un~t¥ Devel-
o~_-_ent Director, ~ conceded ~ ~e s~aff re~ ~a=ed J~e 7,
1982. ~is ac~on is no= a f~ ac=ion, s~cm ~is ~o~r=y ~
stol zoned ~3. Co~c~ will have 2o desi~ate a specific ~one
for ~e ~o~y a: a la, er ~=e.
The public Hearing was opened at 8:26 p.m. ~here being no Cum-
men~s or objec~ions, ~he Public He~ing wu closed. It was ~ved
b~ ~%~nedy, seconded by Hoes=stay, ~a~ ~solu=ion NO. 82-41 be
~sed ~d ~o~ed. ~ried ~0, S~elll ~sen=. ~
~~ ~Oo 82-39- A Resolut±on of t_he City Councll of t. he
City of ~s=~ ~v~G ~~ ~T ~ 10300 (1~82-14942
Ne~r~ Av~)
A~i~ of ~so~u~ion No. 82-39 as ~d~ by ~e C~
m~y D~elo~n= De~en~.
Since Tentative Tract Map 10300 was not au=hot±zed to subd~vide
for cov~-4~ 9~xposes unt.~l ~e 7:30 p.m. plan~g Ag~cy
~e~g ~S ~=e, it w~ ~ed by
~y, ~ ~o~ ~lu~on No. 82-39.
uuu..Lma~
7:30
3:30
~S~E~F~I~ NO. 82-44- A Resolution of
C~ty of Tust. tn, Caltforn/a, ADJUSTING ~A~ER SERVICE ~AT~S
The City Manager asP, ed ~hat =his item be continued in order for
staff to ~ovide ad~tional information on =he overall rates.
Councilman Hoe~srey said ~hat he would like ~o have a study o~
~he Water sys~e~ on a long ts~m basis, perhaps 3 =o 5 year plan.
It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to continue ~his
ite~ as a Public Hearing to ~he July 6th meeting.
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy asked if staff was no~ already working on
a study in order ~o have a 3 to 5 year plan.
Mr. Huston, City Manager, responde~ in ~he affirmative and he
e~phas£zed ~hat we need ~o make a d~s~J~nc~ion between t. he long
=arm ~orrec~ion of ~he syste~ and a shor~ term of meeting
r~nt oblig&tlons. We also need =o begin some effort towards
setting up a reserVe =o cover capital costs.
Mo=ion carried 4-~, Sal~arslli absent.
107
At ~he afternoon meeting, t_he Council set June 17th at 4:00
p.m. as the time for a Budget workshop. Council concurred to
have a workshop on the same night as the Co%%noil meeting of June
21s~ and if another workshop is necessary, it will be on June.
22nd · 29
VII. ~D~uu~T- It was moved by Gre~nke, seconded by Hoestarey, to adjourn
at 8:50 p.m. to a workshop on July 17 at 4:00 p.m. and thence to ~he next
regular meeting on June 21, 1982. Carried. ~