Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP.C. MINUTES 08-02-82TUSTIN PLANNING AGENCY Minutes of Regular Meeting August 2, 1982 The Planning Agency held a regular meeting Monday, August 3, 1982, at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Edgar at 3:00 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Saltarelli and the invocation was given by Mr. Hoesterey. ROLL CALL Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli Absent: None A1 so present: William Huston, City Manager Michael Brotemarkle, Community Development Director James Rourke, City Attorney Janet Hester, Recording Secretary MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting held July lg, 1982, were approved as submitted. PUBLIC HEARINGS: VARIANCE 82-8 Applicant: Location: Request: Mark D. Ainslie 1082-1112 San Juan Street Authorization to vary with zoning requirements and develop standards to construct a twenty-six (26) unit condominium project After presentation of the staff report, Chairman Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 3:05 p.m. Mrs. Edwards, 1381 Orange Street, expressed opposition to the project. She felt that parking was already a problem, especially when the high school across the street was in session and the addition of such a project would aggravate the condition. She also expressed dissatisfaction with the result of the paving on San Juan Street. Mark Ainslie, applicant, presented himself to the Agency for questions and stated the project was designed with the intent of providing amenable, low cost housing. Dr. Atnslie, the applicant's father spoke favorably stating the project would improve a deteriorated area. The Public Hearing was closed at 3:17 p.m. After Agency discussion of concerns about parking, the five garages on Orange Street and improvement of the alley, Mr. Saltarelli moved approval of Variance 82-8 by the adoption of Resolution 2048. Mrs. Kennedy seconded. Mr. Hoesterey asked if any of the variances requested would cause problems for emergency equipment attempting to enter the project. Staff responded ingress would be more than adequate. Mr. Saltarelli requested the motion be amended that conditions of approval include the building be constructed according to the architectural style of the renderings as submitted. Planning Agency Minutes August 2, 1982 Page 2 Motion carried: 5-0 AYES: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELLI PUBLIC CONCERNS: None. OLD BUSINESS: 1. Resolution of Approval for Collins Foods International drive-thru for Kentucky Fried Chicken, 1022 E. First Street. Mrs. Kennedy moved approval of Resolution No. 2047. Mr. Greinke seconded. Motion carried: 5-0 AYES: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELLI 2. Resolution of Denial for Long Thanh Nguyen, 13762 Newport Avenue, Suite D, requesting authorization to operate a health spa. Mrs. Kennedy moved approval of Resolution 2039. Mr. Saltarelli seconded. Motion carried: 5-0 AYES: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELL! NEW BUSINESS: 1. Extension of Tentative Tract Map 11476, Tustin Townhomes, Inc., 14512 Holt Avenue. Mrs. Kennedy moved approval of the Extension of Tentative Tract Map 11476. Mr. Hoesterey seconded. Motion carried: 5-0 AYES: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELLI 2. Tentative Tract Map 11752 - Mark O. Ainslie, 1082-1112 San Juan Street. Mr. Hoesterey moved approval of Resolution 2045 recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 11752. Mr. Greinke seconded. Motion carried: 5-0 AYES: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELLI 3. Report on Future Public Hearings Staff presented a report on three future public hearings concerning an amendment to the City of Tustin Sign Code, and two zone changes. The Agency directed staff to advertise for the public hearings. STAFF CONCERNS: None. AGENCY CONCERNS: Chairman Edgar questioned the status of the General Plan Amendment for Moulton Parkway. Mr. Brotemarkle responded a report would be available in the next two to three months. Planning Agency Minutes August 2, 1982 Page 3 ADJOURNMENT: At 3:28 p.m. to the next regular meeting. Richard B. Edgar, Chairman Recording Secretary AUgUSt 2, 1982 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Edgar at 3:28 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. Agency Members Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, E~ec. Director/City Manager Eva A. Solis, Recording Secretary/Dep. City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Cc~ma. Dev. Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Monda Buckley, Administrative Assistant Approximately 10 in the audience It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to approve the minutes of July ~9, 1982. Carried 5-0. 4. APPND~BL ~ D~RDS It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to approve General Demands for the month of June, 1982, in the amount of $269,848.33 as recommended by the Director of Finance. Motion carried 5-0. 81 Pictorial History of Redevelopment Agency Projects - Agency members concurred with Mr. Hoesterey that staff prepare and keep a pictorial history on Redevelopment AgenCy projects, perhaps including ground- breaking and closing ceremonies. Redevelopment Bond Program Projects - Pursuant to Chairman Edgar's suggestion, a workshop was scheduled for 7:30 p.m. Monday, August 30, 1982, for the purpose of prioritizing projects for the Redevelopment Bond Program. 6. ADJO~M~T It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 3:37 p.m. to the next regular meeting on August 16, 1982. Carried 5-0. OF ~HE ~O8'~1~ CIT~ COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way Au. guSt 2, 1962 TO u~Y~ The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 3=37 Councilpersons Present= Councilpersons Absent= Others Present= Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Royleen White, C~mnunity Services Director Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Norm Hower, Traffic Engineer Monda Buckley, Administrative Assistant Approximately 10 in the audience III. P~C C~C~/~S James Joel Indes, 1942 Hampshire Road, candidate in the Tusttn Uni- fied School District Board of Education election on August 24, requested verification of a statement of Council endorsement for an opponent which appeared in a Tustin neighborhood newsletter. Mr. Indes was informed that the present City Council did not make such an endorsement, but that same was quoted from a resolution of com- mendation presented to the candidate in 1975. The City Attorney stated that resolutions of the Council are public record and can be quoted by anyone in whole or part, and Council does not have author- ity to prevent anyone from doing so. In response to Hr. Indes' request for Council reaction to the incident, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy indicated she was uncomfortable with the situation, and other mem- bers had no comment. Mr. Indes thanked Council and stated that he felt the quote is misleading. C~?-~ It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAL (~ MINUTES- July 19, 1982. 2. APPROq~L ~ D~%ND8 in the amount of $1,437,019.93. RATIFICAT~ ~ PA~, in the amount of $98,412.59. 5O ~F.~C~UTIC~ BO. 82-62 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING REVISED '£~TATIVE TRACT NO. 11582 Adopt Resolution No. 82-62 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 99 EXT~SI~ OF ~TI~E ~ACT~APNO. 11476 Grant subject extension to May 18, 1983, as recommended by the Planning Agency. 99 Se EES~T~ NO. 82--63 - Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, PERTAINING TO THE DISABILITY RETIRE- MENT OF KRIS MORRISON (SECTIC~ 21025, GOVERNMENT CODE) Adopt Resolution NO. 82-63. 79 O~INAN(~ NO. 875 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING THE TJSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE TO THE REGULATI0~ OF SECURITY BUSINESSES In accordance with staff's request, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to continue Ordinance No. 875 to August 16, 1982. Carried 5-0. 82 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 8-2-82 O~IN~NCE NO. 872- An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING ~HE ~JSTIN CITY C0OE RELATIVE TO C~VERSION OF ~JLTIPLE DWR~.~.ING UNITS TO CONDOMINIUMS It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 872 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading by title of Ordinance NO. 872 by the Deputy City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 872 be passed and adopted and that $750.00 he set as the minim~ relocation amount. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None None 43 VII. 1. ESI~,T~T C~ PIerCING C(~%~ISSZ~ & 0~DZNANCE NO. 874 Pursuant to Councilman Hoesterey's suggestion, i~ was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to schedule a workshop for Monday, September 13, 1982, at 7530 p.m. to discuss the elements of reestablishing a Planning Commission and to consider the followi~g ordinance: O~)INANCE NO. 874 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING ~{E TUSTIN CITY C0OE RELATIVE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT, COMPOSITION, JURISDICTION, DUTIES AND TERMS OF OFFICE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN The City Attorney indicated he would be present at the workshop in accordance with Council's request. Motion carried 5-0. 81 2. ~ ZQ~E - NaT STRE~T/B~XAN A~U~ & ~DINaNCE NO. 873 The Traffic Engineer presented the staff report and recommenda- tion and explained the method of computing speed limits as required by the California Vehicle Code. Following a question- and-answer period, it was moved by Saltarelli, secohded by Greinke, to set the speed limit at 35 miles per hour, certify that although the traffic survey indicates 40 miles per hour, due to conditions of a mixed residential/business community, proximity of churches and a school facility, 35 miles per hour is accepted as the 85th percentile speed limit and that same be enforced. As recommended by the City Attorney, the mmtion by Saltarelli, seconded by Greinke, was WITHDRAWN, and it was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Greinke, to continue the matter to the August 16, 1982, meeting. Carried 5-0. 100 3. CUKB, ~'~.--"~. m SIDEWALK C0~ST~C~ (Downtown Area) Following Council's review of the draft letter prepared by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to direct staff to mail same to downtown area residents. Motion carried 5-0. 92 The Community Development Director presented the staff report as contained in the memo dated August 2, 1982, prepared by the Com- munity Development Department which addressed concerns expressed by Council at the July 19 meeting. He then introduced Bob Hennessey, Assistant Chief, Orange County Fire Department. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 8-2-82 Chief Hennessey addressed the wood roof issue, reporting that Assembly Bill 3797-Robinson, to be heard by the Senate Local Government Committee, is r~nning into considerable opposition focused on the fact that the issue of banning untreated wood roofs should be a local matter and not statewide. He continued that there are areas in Northern California that don't have a Santa Ana wind condition, and it is so humid with so much preci- pitation that untreated wood roofs is not a problem as in the ~/stin area. The draft ordinance proposes Class C or better roofing for new construction, and for reroofing in excess of 10% it proposes replacement with a fire retardant roof covering material of Class C or better. Class C roof covering basically provides protection against slight exterior sources of ignition, and is an adequate level of protection for the Tustin area, as well as other Orange County areas. It is felt there is not a significant financial impact associated with the proposed amend- ment. Chief Hennessey pointed out that a Uniform Code can only be amended for three reasons: topography, geography, and mate conditions, and the draft ordinance is substantiated legally by climate conditions as experienced in the City of T~stin. A question-and-answer/discussion period followed. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to direct staff to set for public hearing the proposed ordinance pertain- ing to roof covering materials. Carried 5-0. 81 On the smoke detector issue, Chief Hennessey reported that the retroactive smoke detector ordinance is a draft amendment to the Uniform Fire Code which would essentially require smoke detec- tors for multiple-family residences (three or more) within six months fro~ the date of ordinance adoption; single-family resi- dential homes wo~ld be required to install smoke detectors upon change in ownership. The Orange County Apartment Owners' Asso- ciation has proposed several sections that deal with issues of maintenance and inspection of smoke detectors. The Fire Depart- ment has recommended adoption of those sections to several of its contract cities, which basically state that the apartment owners will install smoke detectors, any apartment tenant that stays for more than two weeks is responsible for testing the detectors, and owners are responsible for posting testing instructions. Further, the inspecting authority (Fire Depart- ment) has permission to randc~ sample smoke detectors by check- ing from 3-5% of apartment units, which would be conducted simultaneously during annual inspection of fire extinguishers in multiple-unit projects. Chief Hennessey stated that the 1973 Edition of the Uniform Building Code required installation of smoke detectors in new construction; therefore, enforcement eforts will be focused on units constructed prior to 1974. The Chief outlined the enforcement program and assured Council that escrow proceedings would not be delayed when single-family detached property changes ownership and that enforcement efforts in single-family detached property will be very low profile. Primary enforcement focus will be on m~ltiple-family apartment units. Following discussion, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to direct staff to set for public hearing the proposed ordinance pertaining to smoke detectors. Councilman Hoesterey expressed concern over entering private homes to enforce the ordinance; councilman Saltarelli indicated he could support enforcement in m~lti-family units, but not in single-family dwellings, and expressed preference for hard-wired smoke detectors as opposed to battery-operated detectors. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy expressed support of the program in pro- tecting life and property. Motion carried 5-0. The Co~ununity Development Director stated he would request the City Attorney to incorporate recommended amendments in the draft ordinance proposed by the O.C. Apartment Owners' Association. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 8-2-82 VIII · BUSINESS As recommended in the report dated July 26, 1982, prepared by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to reconfirm appointments of Phyllis Turtle, Representative, and Bonnie Gillman, Alternate, to the Orange County Health Planning Council Assembly of Delegates. Motion carried 5-0. 70 2. ~TER S~I~VICE HANaG~T PLAN & SYS-~S~I aNALYSIS C(~5OLT~NT S~.W~TI~ As requested by Councilman Greinke, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to continue the matter to the evening session. Carried 5-0. 45 3. S(H.ID ~STE ~N~mm~NT GATE ~s~ - RES(]~T~(I~ NO. 82--66 The City Manager reported that subject resolution was prepared at the Mayor's request following a League of Cities meeting held the week before. Mayor Edgar highlighted the circu~stancee surrounding preparation of the resolution as reported by him at the Ju~y 19 meeting. He continued that adoption of the resolu- tion will provide h/m with the authority to join other cities in taking appropriate action. It was then moved by Greinke, sec- onded by Kennedy, to adopt the following resolution: RE8~5~(~ NO. 82-66- A R~solution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, REGISTERING ITS OBJECTION TO ACTIONS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE IMPROPERLY ADOPTING S~SID WASTE MANAGEMENT GATE FEES AND AUTHORIZING ~ND DIRECTING APPROPRIATE ACTION After a brief discussion period, the motion carried 5-0. 68 IX. ~ BUS.ESS 1. CONFLICT OF IN-£~u~T- C.~v~. SERVICE Councilman Saltarelli requested that in conjunction with more inspections resulting frcm the proposed s~oke detector ordi- nance, staff explore the advisability of preparing an ordinance prohibiting civil service employees from moonlighting while con- ducting on-the-job inspections. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy requested that staff explore methods of controlling residential overcrowding. 3. I-5/55 ~ ~%%SH & DEBRIS Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy requested that staff contact Cal~rans and request that the area along the I-5/55 Freeway interchange be maintained free of trash and debris. Xe I~C~SS- ~ING It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to recess at 4:46 p.m. to an Executive Session for discussion of a legal matter, and thence to the 7:30 p.m. session. Carried 5-0. C(]][~CTT. ~ K K'.L'.I,~G 7:30 P~! MEETING I o The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:30 p.m. CITY C0~NCIL MINUTES Page 5, 8-2-82 II. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director ~onald Nault, Finance Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Charles Thayer, Chief of Police Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Monda Buckley, Administrative Assistant Approx/mately 75 in the audience P~BLIC None IV. PUBLIC H~%RI~GS 1. The City Manager presented the staff report and recommendation on the proposed use of General Revenue Sharing Funds for Fiscal Year 1982-83 as contained in his memo dated July 28, 1982. Mayor Edgar opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. The following persons spoke and requested revenue sharing funds as follows: Nick Ogden and Ida Sternberg - Senior Citizen Center $7,700 Janet Schwartz - Senior Housing $3,000 Fran McGowan - The Villa $5,000 Cliff Polston and Valerie Driscoll - Boys Club of Tustin $4,000 Carol Lind - Assessment & Treatment Services Center $10,000 Elmer Holthus - Christian Temporary Housing Facility $5,000 Sarah Coleman- The LP Repertory Cc~pany $2,500 There being no other speaker~, the Mayor closed the public hear- ing at 8~00 p.m. Senior Citizen Center - It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to allocate $7,700 in revenue sharing f~nds for the Senior Citizen Center. Council discussion followed. In response to Council concerns, the City Manager emphasized that prior to disbursement of reve- nue sharing funds, a form of an agreement would be prepared between the City and any funded organization outlining in detail how funds will be used. The motion carried 5-0. The Villa - In reference to the request from "The Villa," Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated that without staff monitoring of statis- tics on use of the facility by Tustin residents, the request for funds could not be considered at this time. Assessment & Treatment Services Center (ATSC) - It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to allocate $5,000 in revenue sharing funds for ATSC. Councilman Saltarelli stated that statistics of Tustin cases referred to the ATSC juvenile diversion program warrant a higher funding level. The motion was modified by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to allocate $8,000 in revenue sharing funds to ATSC. Motion carried 5-0. 29 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 8-2-82 V. N~ Senior Housing - In response to Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, Mrs. Schwartz stated that she believed the $3,000 request for legal fees would be for the City's attorney. The City Attorney clari- fied that preparation of articles of incorporation and bylaws by his office would be a matter of a couple hundred dollars. The City Manager suggested that Council ask the group to prepare a definitive program sta-ting their goals. Action was deferred on the request until there are more specifics. Boys Club of Tustin - Following Councilman Greinke's supportive comments of Boys Club fL%nctions, it was moved by Greinke, sec- onded by Kennedy, to allocate $4,000 in revenue sharing funds to the Boys Club of Tustin. Motion carried 5-0. 29 The L.P. Repertory Company - Sarah Coleman, Managing Director, clarified her request for theatrical lighting. The Community Services Director responded to Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy that aside from the L.P. Repertory Company, she could not think of any regular-type user for theatrical lights; staff normally con- tracts for such equipment to cut fixed costs when the need arises. She added that if the City had a facility that lent itself more to some permanent platform or stage, it would be very beneficial to have this sort of eql/ipment in the future. Christian Temporary Housing Facility - Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy reiterated that without staff monitoring of statistics on use of the facility by Tustin residents, the request for funds could not be considered at this time. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, to approve the allocation of $444,240 for items submitted by staff as con- tained in the staff report dated July 28, 1982, with the condi- tion that each item come back to Council for subsequent approval. Motion carried 5-0. 29 2. FISCAL YEAR 1982-83 u~UGET The City Manager summarized the final preliminary budget as con- tained in his staff report dated July 28, 1982. Mayor Edgar opened the public hearing at 8:51 p.m. The following person spoke on the matter: Kathy Well, 1702 Sum~erville, Tustin Meadows Homeowners' Asso- ciation, requested that funds be included to allow for installa- tion of traffic signalling equipment at Red Hill and Walnut. Mayor Edgar noted that staff's recommendation does include sub- ject project in the budget. There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the public hear- ing at 8:55 p.m. In accordance with Councilman Saltarelli's suggestion, Council deferred budget discussion to consider the following item. 1. HEA'~HERFTFr-~ PA~KING C~PLAINTS The Assistant City Engineer presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the memo dated July 27, 1982. Warren Ettleman, 14262 Heatherfield Drive, representing approxi- mately ten families, suggested red curbing alongside driveway entrances, and expressed dissatisfaction with Police enforcement of parking regulations. Mr. Ettleman responded to Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy that the excess cars are from the apartment complex at 1777 Mitchell Avenue and reported that some of the end units are utilizing their carports as patios. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 8-2-82 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Con' t. ) The Assistant City Engineer responded to the Mayor that staff should prepare a plan for additional red curbing before proceed- ing on any suggestion. Police Chief ~nayer stated that methodical ticketing tends to upset homeowners because they are generally the first to receive them. He offered suggestions which might help alleviate the parking problem. In accordance with the staff report dated July 27, 1982, pre- pared by the Director of Public Works, and the Police Chief's recommendations, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the following: 1) Post Heatherfield Drive between Mitchell Avenue and Sandwood Place for "No Parking During Street Sweeping Operations" between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and Noon on Mondays; 2) Red curb arcs of curbs at southeast and southwest corners of Heatherfield and Mitchell and northeast corner of Heather- field and Sandwood; 3) Public Works Department to check red curbing on Mitchell for ~nauthorized painting of City curbs by private property owners; 4) Contact residents of 1777 Mitchell via mail and request that they not park their vehicles on Mitchell; 5) Staff to look into blatant violations of misuse of parking spaces (carports used for patios); and 6) Reconsider the matter at the August 16, 1982, meeting addressing red curbing alongside driveway entrances. Councilman Saltarelli stated his interest in preferential park- ing. The Police Chief responded that he has explored preferen- tial parking and does not favor it primarily because administra- tion of it is a nightmare - it is impossible to determine which cars belong to g~ests, end the State-adopted hearing law on con- tested towings requires about two hours per hearing by a three- member board, which the City must usually pay for along with the towing bill. Royce Purcell, 1912 Mitchell Avenue, spoke in favor of "No Park- ing on Street Sweeping Days" signing on the portion of Mitchell between Heatherfield and Browning. The motion carried 5-0. 74 The Council focused its attention beck to discussion of the Fiscal Year 1982-83 Budget. 2. FISCAL ~EAR 1982-83 ~GET- RES. NO. 82-64 & RES. NO. 82-65 Councilman Saltarelli stated he would like to reinstitute a hir- ing freeze, and suggested promoting an e~ployee incentive pro- gram for major cost-saving ideas. Councilman Hoesterey voiced his support of an employee incentive plan and suggested that future budgets contain a contingency plan when revenues decrease as well as increase. Councilman Greinke offered constructive criticism on budgetary procedures. Mayor Edgar stated he is comfortable with the dollar figures; however, he feels it is essential that the budget contain a project timetable and historical data, and clarification of the P~development bal- ance. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated she feels staff has met the challenge in these trying economical times, and offered compli- ments to City staff. Councilman Saltarelli also complimented City staff and suggested the City consider user fees (trash col- lection) to offset decreased revenues. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following: ~ESGE~TI~ NO. 82-64 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ADOPTING THE CITY BUDGET & APPRO- PP~IATING REVENUE OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982-83; RES~UTI~ NO. 82-65 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ADOPTING THE WATER FUND ~UDGET & APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982-83. Carried 5-0. 29 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 8-2-82 ~SINESS As recommended in the staff report dated July 28, 1982, prepared by the City Manager, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to confirm selection of Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services for the Water Service Management Plan & System Analysis for a fee of $45,700; and authorize the Mayor to execute a consultant's agreement for said services. In response to Councilman Hoesterey, the City Manager clarified that this is for both phases of the study. Mayor Edgar added that the time element of 6 weeks for Phase I and 14 weeks for Phase II puts target dates at September 20 for Phase I and January 3 for Phase II in terms of Council meetings, and he requested that these dates be met. The motion carried 4-0, Greinke abstaining. 107 VI. O~HER B~SINESS 1. C~x~dcvr. ~ETING DAYS Councilman saltarelli requested that Council meeting days be discussed at the workshop scheduled for September 13, 1982. 2. OCTO~E~ CQ~{CIL ~-z-~flG ~ES~-~n Pursuant to Mayor Edgar' s recommendation, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to reschedule the second meeting in October to Wednesday, October 20, due to Councilmembers' attendance at the League of California Cities Conference · Carried 5-0 · 38 VII. ADJUST It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to adjourn at 9:40 p.m. to the next regular meeting on August 16, 1982. Carried 5-0.