HomeMy WebLinkAboutNB 2a WTR SVC MGMNT 08-02-86A GENDA
DATE: JULY 28, 1982 Inter-eom
TO:
FROH:
SUBJECT:
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
BOB LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
WATER SERVICE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SYSTEM ANALYSIS CONSULTANT SELECTION
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Tustin City Council, at their meeting of August 2, 1982, confirm the
selection of Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide the engineering services for
the Water Service Management Plan and System Analysis for the fee of $45,700 and
authorize the Mayor to execute a consultants agreement for said services.
BACKGROUND:
In late May, 1982~ staff solicited a Statement of Qualifications from fifteen
consultant firms for the subject study. Four firms were selected to submit
proposals for the engineering services to complete said study. These firms were:
Alderman, Swift and Lewis of Santa Aha
Boyle Engineering Corporation of Newport Beach
James M. Montgomery, Inc. of Irvine
P.R.C. Toups, Inc. of Orange
DISCUSSION:
The selection committee, composed of Dale Wick, Reed Jensen, Earl Rowenhorst, and
Bob Ledendecker, has selectd the firm of Boyle Engineering to complete the said
study based upon a comprehensive review of the written proposals and oral
interviews of each of the four firms. Each of the four firms reviewed would
certainly be capabl? of performing this study.
Following is a prioritized list of the ranking of these firms for selection
purpose and their associated fees:
1. Boyle Engineering Corp.
2. James M. Montgomery, Inc.
3. Alderman, Swift and Lewis
4. P.R.C. Toups
$45,700
50,500
79,800 - $82,800
47,000
This study has been separated into two phases as follows:
Phase I - Management Program
Phase II- System Analysis
WATER SERVICE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SYSTEM ANALYSIS CONSULTANT SELECTION
JULY 28, 1982
PAGE TWO
Boyle Engineering has indicated that Phase I will take six (6) weeks to complete
after they have received a notice to proceed and Phase II will take fourteen (14)
weeks to complete in addition to Phase I and after they have received the notice
to proceed.
BOB LEDEN~ECKER
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/
CITY ENGINEER
db
cc: Dale Wick
Reed Jensen
Earl Rowenhorst
June 17, 1982
DeFartment of Public 14orks/Engineering
James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc.
17802 Sky Park Circle, Suite 201
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn.: DuWayne Lidke
RE: REQUEST FOR PROPO~ FOR llJSTIN WA~R SERVICE ~NA~EI~ENT PRO.AM
AND SYSTE~ ANALYSIS - FILE ~2910
Dear Mr. Lidke:
Your firm is one of four firms that has been selected to submit a proposal for the
Tustin Water Service Management Program and System Analysis.
The four firms selected are listed as follows:
Alderman, Swift and Lewis, Inc.
Boyle Engineering
James M. Montgomery, Inc.
P.R.C. Toups
As indicated in the previous R.F.Q., the study will be divided into two phases;
the Water Management Program and the Engineering Analysis and Capital Improvement
Program. Each of these phases will include, but not necessarily be limited to,
the following:
WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
1. Estab)iish the primary pbrpose of the City Water Service.
2. Establish the basic objectives of the Water Service, i.e. to provide a
cost-effective and reliable service to all customers.
e
Evaluate the feasibility of expanding or decreasing the scope of the system by
means of acquiring other agency's systems or the sale of portions of the
present system.
Evaluation of groundwater production v.s. purchased water, pumping v.s.
storage facilities, water quality constraints v.s. consumer costs, and system
redundancy v.s. interruptible pricing.
5. Definition of the short and long term tasks the City must undertake to addres~
the needs of the Water Service.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR ~USTIN WATER SERVICE
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND SYSTEM ANALYSIS
JUNE 17, 1982
PAGE TWO
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Evaluation of the City Water System's ability to meet the demands of present
and future development with respect to domestic and fireflow requirements.
Evaluation of the system to determine which system facilities are in need of
repair or replacement.
Preparation of a Master Water System Plan for future development within the
service area(s).
Preparation of a capital improvement plan for the water system including
information about the means of financing needed improvements.
Your firm should expand on any areas within each of these phases that you feel
have not been addressed and include them as a part of your proposal.
The City has currently retained a consulting firm to provide the engineering
services for a water system financial review and rate study. It will be the
responsibility of the consultant selected for this project to coordinate their
activities with the City's consultant performing this financial review and rate
study.
It is requested that your proposal be submitted in two parts with a separate fee
and a designated time period required to complete the work for each phase. It is
the City's intention to retain only one consultant for both phases of the study.
The notice to proceed for the second phase of the study will be issued once the
City has reviewed and approved Phase I.
Your proposal should be mailed or delivered to the Director of Public Work's
office, City of Tustin, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92680 no later than 5:00
PM on July 6 1982.
In the event you desire additional information about the Tustin Water Service or
this R.F.P., please contact either Earl Rowenhorst, Dale Wick, or myself.
Very truly yours,
BOB LEDENDECKER
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/
CC'
Bill Huston
Reed Jensen
Earl Rowenhorst
Dale Wick
LIST OF CONSULTANTS
~Boyle Engineerin9 1501 Quail St. P.O. Box 3030 Newport Beach, CA 92663
Attn.: Mr. Vic Opincanr.l~Mr. Opincaq_~
~Alderman, Swift and Lewis 1201E. Warner Avenue Santa Ana, CA
Attn.: Mr. Roy Lamaq]~Lamaq.~
u James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. 17802 Sky Park Circle,
ire 201 Irvine, CA 92714 Attn.: DuWayne Lidk~Lidke~
~APRC Toups 972 Town & Country Rd. Orange,CA 92667
Attn.: Mr. Bill Everest~Everest~
1
2
5
RESOLUTION NO. 82-66
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REGISTERING ITS OBJECTION
TO ACTIONS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ORANGE IMPROPERLY ADOPTING SOLID
WASTE M~ANAGEMENT GATE FEES AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING APPROPRIATE ACTION.
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Orange on July 13, 1982, unanimously adopted solid waste
management gate fees and took other related actions without
reasonable consultation and coordination with the public
and the cities of Orange County; and
9
10
11
~tF~EAS, the actions of the Board of Supervisors
of the County of Orange are totally deficient in form and
content both as to compliance with reasonable inter-
governmental relationships and the laws of the State of
California; and
12
13
14
WHEREAS, the general public, businesses and the cities
of Orange County received only three working days notice
of the intention of the Board of Supervisors to consider
imposition of these new fees and other related actions
taken by the Board of Supervisors; and
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
WHEREAS, the actions of the Board of Supervisors
of the County of Orange have put the public, businesses
and cities of the County of Orange into a situation where
if the actions of the Board of Supervisors are allowed
to stand, the public will be faced with millions of dollars
of fees without adequate advance notice and planning to
enable such expenditures to be properly budgeted and other-
wise arranged for; and
WHEREAS, a comraittee of Orange County City Attorneys,
together with the City Attorney of the City of Tustin,
have reviewed the actions of the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Orange and have advised that 'those actions
are improper and not in compliance with applicable statu-
tory requirements; and
24
25
26
WHEREAS, the City of Tustin and the other cities
of Orange County and the Orange County Division of the
League of California Cities have attempted to advise the
Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange of the problems
and concerns of the cities and of the businesses and general
public of Orange County and have been totally and completely
rebuffed by the Board of Supervisors;
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE,, the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, does hereby resolve as follows:
1
2
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
24
25
26
27
28
1. The City Council hereby registers its complete
and total objection to the form and content of the actions
of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange taken
on July 13, 1982 in the imposition of solid waste management
gate fees and other retated actions~.
2. The Mayor, City Attorney and staff of the City
of Tustin are hereby authorized and directed to take each,
every and all steps deemed reasonable and appropriate to
register the objections of the City of Tustin to the impo-
sition of solid waste management gate fees and other related
actions taken by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Orange on July 13, 1982.
3. The City Attorney of the City of Tustin is au'thor-
ized and directed to join in, support and advance each,
every and all legal actions deemed reasonable and appro-
priate by the City Attorney to prevent the imposition of
solid waste management gate fees without proper compliance
with 'the applicable statutes and reasonable and.appropriate
coordination with the cities of the County of Orange.
4. The Mayor of the City of Tustin is hereby auth-
orized and directed to advise the Orange County Division
of 'the League of California Cities of the position of the
City of Tustin and to vote at the next meeting on August
12, 1982 in a manner deemed reasonable and appropriate
by the Mayor to aid and advance the positions expressed
herein and to commit the City of Tustin to joining in such
actions to be undertaken jointly by the cities of Orange
County and coordinated with the Orange County Division
of the League of California Cities, as the Mayor deems
reasonable and appropriate.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, California, held on the
day of , 1982.
ATTEST:
~YOR
CITY CLERK
JGR:se:R:7/29/82
-2-
June 22, 1982
William A. Huston
City Manager
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Dear Mr. Huston:
JUN 2 I 82
Enclosed is the information you requested about our
Juvenile Diversion Programs at the Boys Club. We
hope that you will consider us for funding from the
Revenue Sharing money for 1982.
In 1977 the Orange County Boys Club Workers Association
felt i~ was necessary to have a direct line in each
co~',unlty to work with youth problems. Full funding
was received from the Irvine Foundation for 10 Boys
Clubs for a 3uvenile Delinquency Intervention
Specialist to be hired. Tustin was selected as one
of the 10 Area Boys Clubs.
After the first two yea=% t~e program.was found to
be so successful that additional funding was received
~o continue ~he program for an additional two years
rom the California Foundation and Anderson Trusts.
In 1981 the Boys Club Board of Directers officially
made the Intervention Specialist a full time position.
It was made possible with 33% fundin~ coming from the A
Anderson Trusts and the balance (67%) being raised
by the Boys Club.
This year the funding runs out and we are asking the
City of Tustin to designate Revenue Sharing money to
this program. The project costs approximately $12,000
annually. Ail or partial funding or at least the
amount of support we are losing, $4,000 would be
deeply appreciated, as the Intervention Specialist
is involved with all the programs described in the
enclosure.
Your wanted da~e on participants, benefits and the
relationship wmth the Police Department, all this
information is explained in the attached report.
If you have further questions or need more information
please call me.
Thank you.
Roy Calvetti, President
OF TUSTIN
Boys Club
of Tustin, Inc.
580 W. Sixth Street
P.O. Box 781
Tustin, CA 92680
(714) 838-5223
838-3054
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Officer~
Roy Calvetti
President
Mike Immell
Vice President
John Oempsay
Secretary
Jim Kile
Treasurer
Hank Bierman
*Paul D. Bos
Dt Paul Constantine
Richard Edgar
Hoilis Griffin
Tom Hippensteel
Russ Houlihan
Dr. Howard Jamieson
Mary Lou Kaffel
George Matthews
Bill Reeves
Jack Robinson
Anne Schultz
Jim Turner
A member of United Way
of Orange Not~h/South
BOYS CLUB OF TUSTIN
DIVERSION PROGRAMS
NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (Confidential)
Over 200 families have participated in the Needs Assessment
questionnaire since September 1981. This assessment gives the
staff at the Tustin Boys Club specific and more detailed in-
formation about not only the members we serve but also their
families. This background information gives the opportunity
to set more specific goals and objectives in the programs.
The overall objective of the Needs Assessment was and is to
help understand and resolve those problems presented by our
members and their families.
STAFF TRAINING (The Community also invited)
The Long Beach Speakers Bureau has presented Speakers on various
topics to our Staff. These presentations were given by pro-
fesiionals in their particular fields. Some areas covered
in staff meetings/training have been Discipline, Stress..Re-
duction, Assertion Training, Self Management, Behavior Modifi-
cation, Listening Skills, Crisis Intervention, Single Parent-
ing (emphasizing both mother/father) and many more. All of
these areas not only benefit the staff but with those persons
the staff work with on a day ~o day basis, the members and
families of our Boys Club. This involves all staff and members
on a continuous interaction basis.
TUTORING
Since September 1980, the Tutoring Program has expanded. The
Staff has worked with approximately 150 different cases of
academic as well as behavioral tutoring in this period of time.
At least 40% of these cases were on a structured 1 to 2 ~im~s
a week. Tutoring was accomplished in areas including: Math,
English, History, Social Studies, Reading, Writing, etc. Our
Club has benefited from resources such as the various schools
in our co,~ity as well as the Learning Center in Tustin.
JOB REFERRALS
We receive and extend job placement to adolescents in the Tustin
corm, unity. The jobs range from newspaper deltveryto house
painting. Any person from the age of 12 and on through 18, we
do our best to help or refer to an agency which can help. In
the past two years the Club has helped over 60% ( 40 out of 70)
o2 kids looking for jobs. Although this is no~ one of our
primary programs, with more money we could develop a Job Place-
ment Program to its fullest extent.
LEARNING CENTERS & SPEAKERS & FILMS
In the past two years and estimated 700 kids from the ages of
7 through 18 have gone through various programs we have offered.
-2-
These programs included: Sex Education, Drug & Alcohol Abuse,
Safety, C. P. R., Nutrition & Health, Emergency Procedures ~or
Fire, Flood and Earthquake, Self Defense, Wildlife Protection,
etc. Not only has the Boys Club of Tustin involved its members
in these programs but also its Junior and CETA Staff. One of
our more interesting programs deals with showing ~he movies,
"Scared Straight" and "The Squires of San Quentin". We then
have discussions and speakers from varioup co~n~ty agencies:
1) Juvenile Hall 2) P61ice Department 3) Probatzon and 4)
Ex-offenders. This area helps to broaden the children in our
co~unity and gives them a choice.
COUNSELING
The Counseling Program has offered individual, group and family
interactzon. Many problems can be solved with patience, under-
standing and the ability to listen. In the last 2 years, at
least 250 cases have been worked on. Of theseat least 60% -'~
included member cases znvolving only the Member, 30% were fam~ y
cases involving at the least the member and one parent usually
the mother, and the final 20% were group sessions, more than one
child or one fsmily at a time.
Included in the Counseling Sessions were home visits, at least
on 20 different occasions. Some specific cases included:
Child molestation, child abuse, child neglect, alcoholism,
divorce, single Parenting, etc. The couns~ing program at Tustin
has constantly worked with and supported, as well as been support-
ed by co~m,~nity agencies, such as: The School District and all
commun%ty intermediate and hSgh schools, Police Department,
(especially Officer Jim Hein), etc.
SARB BOARD
Since September 1980, Don Williams the DPP Counselor at the iustin
Boys. Club has served on the Tustin SARB Board. In the past 2
years at least 200 cases have been handled by the Board. These
cases include students from all schools in the Tustin community
with academic, behavioral or truant problems. The students are
counseled and offered contracts for returning to school, place-
ment in special schools, counseling through ATSC or referral to
the Judical System. Don has worked closely with other pro-
fessionals in the co~m~,unity including Dr. Regina Cain, Detective
Jim Hein, Bob Lucas, Counselor at Htllview, Scott Lee, Therapist
with Mental Health, Pat Cole, Probation, Lanr~Wiggins, Special
Education. The participation on this Board gives credibility
to the corm, unity of Tustin as well as each member on the Board.
Since Don represents the Tustin Boys Club we are giving back
to the co~un%ty and helping its youth to overcome academic as
well as behavzorial problems.
Our own counseling program has also been used as a referral by
schools, police department, current members and the Short Stop
Program. A.t least 2 to 3 cases a month are referred from the
-3-
Short Stop ~ro~ram (a juvenile diversion program) to Don Willi~ms
at the Tustln Boys Club. Over the past year at least 30 - 40
referral cases have been seen.by Don. At lea~t 40 - 50~ of these
cases remain in some contact if not on a consistent baszs.
HONOR DOLLAR PROGRAM
T~is program is run by our Physical Education Director, Tim
Rzcbardson. The program conszsts of members doing good deeds
and earning honor dollars,,for their efforts. On every Friday
an auction is held for members with honor dollars to buy
merchandise. We feel this program instructs members in fairmess,
honesty, money management, work ethics, togetherness, usefull-
ness, etc. At least 500 kids have been involved with the honor
dollar program in the last year and a half.
BUSING PROGRAM
The Busing Program consists of us%ng the Boys Club 2 vans to
pick up children after school durzng the school year and in the
morning at specific areas in Tustin during the summer months.
By going to the kids we have increased our daily attendance
by at least 30% and overall membership by at least 40%. If the
students can afford it, they pay 50 cents per day, if not they
ride free. During the School year we pick up and bring to the
Boys Club approximately 8,800 kids and it is estimated at least
450 to 500 will be on the s~maer busing program. Thzs program
not only helps improve our attendance, it is a primary reason for
8,800 kids during the s~hool year and at least 450 kids during
the s~%-~er being off the streets and involved in structured
activities at the Tustin Boys Club.
PROBATION DEPARTMENT
They use our club four times a month, 1st, 2nd 3rd and 4th Tuesdays.
P. O. Larry Wong and Mike Collins see 40 to 50 youth a week and
agree= that the attendance of these young people has been good
due to it being here at our club. There are many possibilzties
for the high percentgge of participation ?f these juveniles, but
whatever the reason it seems that the Tustzn Boys Club zs an
appropriate place for probation work.
June 21, 1982
c 4 SC
Bom'd of Directors:
GEORGE E. DASHIELL
President
JAMES DALE '
EL~NE J. PARKER
JUNE R. ADAMS
I..~V~S S. A~F. RMAN,
JOHN W. APPLEGATE, M.D,
WALTER R. C~-%YNER
MICHAEL C. GERING
CMARLES IN. HEST~R
GEORG~' H. JONES
JUDITH H. LOOS
LOLL% LEE MOORE
MARGARET F. REED
CALVIN P. SCHMIDT
JOHN H. SCUDDER
ELIZABETH A. TOOMEY
LORING P, WARMINGTON
ROBERT W. WILCOX
ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT SERVICES CENTER
April 13, 1982
May~r James Sharp
City of
300 Centenn/al Way
Tustln, Califor~i~ 92680
OF COASTAL ORANGE COUNTY
APR 1 1582
As a nc~-p~-ofit agency diractl¥ impact/rig the city of T~_in,
we respectfully request your consideration for a contribution
of $10,000 to be used as a portion of the salary for- counselors
in ATSC's juvenile diversion progr~LL.
Enclosed is basic back~.'ound material. This letter is in-
tended to highlight significant aspects of ATSC's program in
Financial support f.~.ua(~ t~ city of Tustin w~ 1J be :eC.-~ned to
,Tustin. Since Dec~mher 1974, ATSC bas b~lped more than 4000 local !~uths and
family n~abers in the Coastal Orange COunty area. ATSC has counseled Tustin re-
fe~aals s/rice 1974; in 1980 ATSC ~rked with 27 cbi]dr~ and their families; in
1981 ATSC b,=lped 38 Tustin ~ plus th~ r families. Currently ATSC handles all
diversion referrals fa.~a the Tuse-ln Police Depa~',~t. In addition, the School
AtteDaance P~view Board f~ Tus~in Unified School District refers to A~SC.
ATSC anticipates increased refe~f=ls in 1982. Child abuse, no~-cus~ ~obation,
and school ref~aals are currently beinq researched by the Board and staff as n~
types of referrals...any of which, accordiv, g to law enforcement agencies, represent
a potential increase of clienta to ATSC. Also, the recent cutback in Federal law
enforcement mo~ey w~ll impact ATSC'S caseload. According to Bob Dunbar, Admin-
istrator for the Juveml l e Management ConsortiLln, 1500-2000 county youths who re-
ceived county-sponsored diversion services will-not be ~l i gible for help in 1982.
ATSC will pr_~fice~h~y absorb many of these laDut_hs in our coastM area. Chief
C. P~ Tbayer predicts that TusCan refea~als for 1982 will ~atinue to ir~Ir~e.
ATSC's pro~£=~ is cost effective. 1981 opera, lng costs w~re apprcodmately
$130,000. Six hundred ¢lien~ wire tested a~d counseled at a y~ly average of
$216 per clieilt. (The current rate for a private psychologist is $60-70 per hour;
for a Marriage, Family and Child counselor, $50 per hour.) Also included in ATSC's
averag~ is the cost of tb~ asses.~m~nt/testing phase--an area only recant, ly assumed
in-house due to spec4 all zed capabilities of our t~D s~f psyctx)logists.
A L~ted Way ~ Agetlcy
1981 ORCHARD DRIVE, SANTA ANA, 'C_.ALIFORNLA 92707 (714) 549-1814
"ARREST THE PROBLEM -- NOT THS. CHILD" ...
Ma~Dr James Sharp- Page 2
ATSC ncc~_-_s city gove~=Lent financial assistance. This letter is ATSC's first
request for funding f=~L~ the Ci~; of Tustin. ATSC represents an intrinsic part
of the ~icsn ph4]osophy of public/private initiative. Since 1974, 90% of
our fudging has been frcm the private sector. ~ other 10% b~-~ come f~n the
cities of New~ort Beach and Costa Mesa. Until this year, Costa ~.~_sa's alloca-
t/mn was $10,000 ann,~]ly, but was_ recently reduced to $3000 due to funding
cutbacks. Currently, the City of N~port r~ses ATSC $120 per referral--
tb~ projects to $12,000 for 1982.
ATSC is recog~.ed as a local resource. More than 258 citizens and
have chosen to join our three-y~-old Support Group. During the past year,
th~s' cc~mitted orgaD~-ation was responsible for 2500 office volunteer Pmurs,
$15,520 in d,~, and $62,000 in _special events. Currently ATSC is
a O~,~..,nity Awareness Course at the Tustin Police De_~U~nt which highlights
ATSC is a successful juvenile diversion prcgr~n. The lat~.~t evaluation .shows
90% of th~ juveniles who completed r___~3~ended treatment did n~t bec=~ wards
of t_he court, and 80% b~ no furthe~ encounters with the law. W/mat the evalua-
W~ couldn't me~e is ATSC's positive "ripple effect" in the Tustin area.
Your 1982 cc~tributi~ of $10,000 towards the juvenile diversic~ prc~.u=u will
benefit at l~t forty Tustin l~uths and th~4r families by divert/rig these
ju%'~iles frcm the juvenile justice syst~n. Finally, tb~ lcng-t~n result of
Tust/n's fu~a~ng t~wards ATSC's juvenile diversion ~Dgz~.~ w~ll be a strengthen-
ing of hu~n resources in our local area.
Sincerely,
~ol K. Lind
Director of Development
Bc~l d B. Hoesterey, Council Me~ber
Donald J. Saltarelli, Council Me~ber
W~]l~n~ Huston, City Manager
C. P~ Thayer, Chief of Police
STATISTICS FOR COASTAL ORANGE COUNTY
ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT SERVICES CENTER
December, 1981
REF~S:
To=al Cases:
New:
Re-Opened:
November
20
20
0
Year To Date
196
· 177
19
Males:
Females:
10
l0
110
86
M~an Age: 14.5
Modal Age: 16.
Range: 9 - 17 years old
RETER~ING SOURCES: :
Newport Beach Police Dept.
Costa Mesa Police Dept.
Tustin Police Dept.
Irv~ne Police Dept.
Other - Re-Opened - Parent
Client
Orange County Fire Dept.
S.A.R.B.
13
3
3
0
0
0
0
1
34
38.
2
12
1
4
REASON FOR REFERRAL: Males
W & I 602 - 8 Cases
Possession Stolen Prop. 1
Possession' Dru§s
Possession Marij usna 2
Pe~:ty Theft ..-, 1
Possession Alcohol'
W & I 601 - 1 Case
Pu/naway 1
W & I 300 - 1 Case
Curfew Vto lation
Non-Arrest - 10 Cases
Theft 1
Family Problems
Into rr tg ib le
Truancy 2
Rape Victim
TotabActtve Cases as of December 31, 1981 - 57
Total Scheduled Appointments, December, 1981 - 270
No-Shows - 16 .(Si9Z)
Females
2
1
4
1
1
2
3
1
1
.2
1
ATSC is an ongoing program with its only activity being the diagnosis and
counseling of behaviorally disturbed juveniles. The unique value of the ATSC
program is tha~ a.l_l' of its resources 'are devoted t.o helping t/~se youngsters
who have ~,~irically shown that they are in the greatest need of guidance, yet
are st_~_l ameDnhle to professioDal b~_lp wit_But the necessity of introducing
then to the Juvenile Court System.
The juveniles brought to the attention of the A/~C st~6f have eithmr been
arrested, ~ed by ~olice, or refe~ed to the ~olice by
If th~ arrest/rig officer feels that the minor has not progressed beyond the ~oint
where the only oE~-%on is to file a petition in Juvenile Court, he may call ATSC
and arrange for ATSC's professioD~l staff to interview th~ minor. The minor and
his family are th~n interviewed by trod m~n~_rs of th~ ATSC staff to determine
wh~ch~r the juve~{!e ~ be amenable to the kTSC program.
ATSC anticipates ex~ng the type of referrals in 1982, Child abuse, non-
custody probation, and sc/~Dol referrals are currently being researched by the Board
and s~aff as new types of referrals...any of which, according to law enforcement
agencies, represent a ~otent/al increase of clients at A_mSC. In addition, the
recent cutJoack in Federal law enforcew~nt mc~ey will impact ATSC's caseload.
According to Bob Du~m~, A~ministrator for the Juvenile Management Consorti~n,
1500-2000 county youths who received, county-sponsored diversion services will not
be eligible for help in 1982; ATSC will predictably absorb many of these youths
in our southern Orange County area.
Experience has shown that one of the most important rehabilitative el~nents
is parental support. Parents r~ust participate in t_he ATSC program also. Other
factors evaluat~~4 include the nature of the offense conltitted, previous arrest
r~cord, the juvenile's attitude t~ard the ATSC staff, existence a~J nature of
~us~al physical or me~t~al problems, attitude tcw-~rd school, peer group relation-
ships, etc.
After the problem is diagnosed, the treatment program, specifically tailored
to the minor's probl~n, is developed by the staff. Depending, of course,.upon the
r~ture of ~the prohlen, the staff may att~ ~ h~p ~ j~ile ~stm~ w~
~ ~ v~ta~ ~ ~w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. If a~te, ~
~f ~y a~ ~ r~l~ ~~ ~ ~ ~or ~ ~s
~ ~t is a ~ fair ~ ~ ~-~ ~vior. ~ ~C staff is ~ain~
~ ~m~l ~ ~St of ~ ~bl~ ~ ~nt ~ j~l~. ~ n~es~,
~v~, p~is:, ~ici~, ~d o~ ~ic~ ~1~ ~
~ces ~ ~t ~bl~ ~ng ~ ~ 0f ~ ~i~ of ~ ~s.
~ ~C s~f ~, ~, r~ ~ j~es ~ ~r ~ci~ ~
~s ~ ~h ~ is a~priate.
~ ~ p~a~ ~ ~,~~ly ~ors~ ~ ~ ~e ~ ~ of
~rs, ~ ~ P~ Offic~ of ~e ~, j~es, ~4ce ~s,
~ 1982,. ~C ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ge ~ P~n ~~= for
~s ~ ~m] 4~, ~ ~c~ ~ ~ P~~ ~d/or ~ge, F~y
~ ~ ~~g. AIl ~e ~%~]{~4~ ~ ~t~ p~l~ te~. ~C's
~rs ~ve ~~ ~ ~n, ~t~] h~, ~ll~te ~~,
~ of S~~s ~ch ~ ~C ~ u~ize s~c~ of at 1~ one d~
~ ~t~n office; ~ ret~ ~SC r~ses ~e ~ for ~ ~on
office' s ~, ~ ~ ~its'2
S~ce ~ 1974, ~C ~s s~ 4000 f~] [~. T~ ~st r~t ~on
~ ~ ~ ~ge ~=y P~n ~U~t ~ ~= 80% of ~ j~es
~ ~le~ ~t ~ ~ f~ ~t~s ~ ~ ~w ~ ~ 90% of
~ j~l~ ~ ~le~ ~ r~,~d~ ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ of ~
TE L~:VISION 88
COMICS B10
~nyate group treats
public problem
,,071HO BHI ION '~4/B780WW BHI I SgHWV,,
~ ~ Zo
DATE:
July 15, 1982
Inter-eom
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Bill Huston, City Manager
C. R. Thayer, Chief of Police
ATSC Revenue Sharing Donation
I have reviewed the request from Carol Lind of ATSC {Assessment
and Treatment Services Center) and I totally concur with a
donation to this program.
For the last several years, we have been utilizing ATSC as a
referral for troubled youth. Their counseling has been
excellent. Their success rate has been above 80% of non-repeat of
those people they have handled. Additionally, if they have any
problems with the youth, they recontact the Police Department so
that we can remain involved in the issue and assert our pressure
in order to get the treatment the youth or his family need.
To date we have not donated anything to ATSC for the services
rendered to the community of Tustin. Each treatment is estimated
to cost approximately $216 per referral. As can be seen by Mrs.
Lind's letter, the City of Tustin received $8,208 benefits in 1980
from the 38 Tustin youths and families that this Department
referred to ATSC. We are estimating approximately 50 referrals in
the coming year, which will amount to services received of about
$10,800. I would recommend that the City support ATSC in whatever
about possible, with a minimum donation of $5,000.
The service ATSC provides is equal to two full-time sworn
positions in the Police Department should they not provide the
service. As you can see, our donation would be well spent.
CRT:dh
The Repertory Company
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
JOHN RICHARDSON
TOM MOON
Vice President
DON RAINEY
JUNE BAIN
Secretary
DARYL CARLSON
DAN CHAPEL
SARAH COLEMAN
JIM FRASER
CLYDE HAMM
Ronald Nault
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
July 19, 1982
EECEtVED
JUL 2, 0 198Z
FINANCE DEPT.
Dear ~,~r. Nault,
The L.P. Repertory Company, a Tustin non-profit organization
under 501(C)(3) would like to apply for a $2,500 grant from
MARYKERNODLE the city revenue sharing money. Funds would be spent to
~RRYREEVE$ purchase lighting equipment to be used exclusively in Tustin.
One of the major drawbacks to performing in our city is the
totally inadequate lighting in the Clifton C. Miller Community
Center. Exxon Corporation has agreed to store the equipment
for us. We would also like to stipulate as part of the grant
that we share usage with the Community Services Department,
providing they pick up the equipment and return it in good
working condition. L.P.R. already has the light bars necessary
to temporarily install such fixtures and would be happy to
make them available to Community Services. The equipment
purchased would be standard theatrical lighting which could
be transfered to any other building should Tustin ever wish
to relocate its' performing arts area.
?le feel strongly that proper lighting would greatly enhance
audience enjoyment of all such presentations. Thank you for
your consideration.
Respectfully,
Sarah Coleman
[~[anaging Director
SC:dl
1451 Sgcamore, Tustin, California 92680 · (714) 731-2792
~TE:
July 29, 1982
Inter-Corn
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Deputy City Clerk
Public Hearing No. 1 - Proposed Use of General Revenue Sharing Funds
Attached is additional material on subject agenda item. Nick Ogden delivered
the information today and requested that it be distributed to Council prior
to the public hearing.
Eva A. Solis
Attachment
c: Depa~'lr,'~_nt Heads
July 29, 1982
Assemblyman Nick Ogden
California Senior Legislature
Representing Older CalifOrnians in Orange County
Dear Councilperson:
RE: Request fgr Revenue Sharing Funds for preliminary study
and planning for a Tustin Multi-Purpose Senior Center.
In March 1982 I appeared at a public hearing held by the
Finance Director relative to the use of Revenue Sharing Funds
credited to the city of Tustin. At this meeting I gave the
following testimony.
I. stated that I represented the fastest growing portion of
our population. The State of California has 3~ million Seniors,
and I estimate that there are between 5,000 and 6,000 of them
in the Tustin area, and this number grows daily.
Most all of these Seniors live on a "Fixed Income". Infla-
tion has affected their lives in a very harsh way. Not only
have they had to face the trama of retzrement, but many have
experienced loss of spouse, poor health, forced change of en-
vironment; lonesome by ~ay and terrified by night.
Now the facts ~remAzn that the Senior Citizens are here,
and their problems are real. Their problems could not have
been anticipated and many of their problems were not of their
own making.
In 1981 the Tustin Co~m~unity Services Department conducted
a "Needs Assessment" of the Senior co~m'~unity; 367 Seniors.
responded to some 34 areas of needs. Two areas o~ need pre-
dominated the assessment: I. Acquisition of a Multi-purpose
Senior Center, II. Housing assistance.
A Multi-Purpose Senior Center has many advantages, not only
in its effect on the Senior co~m~nity. 1. It becomes the
"focal point" in all Senior activities and all information and
referral relative to services available to the Senior. 2. Numerous
cities with Multi-Purpose Centers receive a priority on Federal
and State allocations of money and food distribution.
This year the State Legislature has spent time in s~udying
cost-effective methods of caring for our aging population.
A substation of these finding seem to be as follows: 1. The
most expensive and least effective method is placing them in
Rest Homes and Convalescent Hospitals. 2. The "In Home Care"
method has received a lot of discussion in the State Legislature.
The concept is~that it is che~per and much better for the aging
person to be allowed to stay ~n their own home, receiving supple-
mental help (s~opping assiStance, house cleaning, etc.) from
community.servzces. 3. Ail studies agree that the cheapest and
best way zs to~.keep the~Senior active, provide a happy fellow-
Page 2
ship, and make it possible for them to take care of themselves in
their own homes.
At this time, I am requesting that you prayerfully conmid'er
allocating $7,700 of the Revenue Sharing Funds for the purpose of
taking the first step for developing plans that would lead to the
ultimate acquisition of a Multi-Purpose Senior Center for the
Tustin co~m~uni~y. The $7,700 would be used for: 1) A feasibility
study, 2) archlteCtual and engineering design studies, and 3)
working drawings.
It is suggested that this fund be administered by a committee
formed from representatives from the Tustin Co~mnunity Services
and Tustin CoLmL~unity Development Departments, and The Tustin
Senior Advisory Conm~ittee.
I sincerely thank you for your time and consideration of
this request.
Nick Ogden--
Additional Information:
The Seniors that I represent are aware that the participants in
the Tustin Program come from many areas: Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana,
Orange and unincorporated Orange County; therefore this project
should be developed under the guidance and control of the Czty of
Tustin, but implemented through a non-profit co~m~nity organiza-
tion appealing to the total co~m~unity for funds to build and to
operate. ~
Nif
Tustin T.L.C. Senior Center