HomeMy WebLinkAboutP.C. MINUTES 09-07-82TUSTIN PLANNING AGENCY Minutes of Regular Meeting September 7, 1982 The Planning Agency held a regular meeting Tuesday, September 7, 1982, at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Edgar at 3:00 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Hoesterey and the invocation was given by Chairman Edgar. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Also present: MINUTES Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli William Huston, City Manager Michael Brotemarkle, Community Development Director Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works James Rourke, City Attorney Janet Hester, Recording Secretary The minutes of the regular meeting held August 16, 1982, were approved as submitted. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. ZONE CHANGE 82-4 Applicant: Location: Request: Initiated by City Council 17311, 17341 McFadden To change the zone designation from Multiple Family Residential {R-3) to Commercial General-Planned Unit Development (CG-PUD) After presentation of the staff report, Chairman Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 3:03 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chairman Edgar closed the Public Hearing at 3:03 p.m. Mr. Hoesterey moved adoption of Resolution No. 2051 recommending approval of Zone Change 82-4 to the City Council. Mr. Greinke seconded. Motion carried: 4-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 2. USE PERMIT 82-21 EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY None KENNEDY, SALTARELLI Applicant: Location: Request; Taco Bell on behalf of Realty Income Properties 14232 Newport Avenue (C-1 District) Authorization to provide drive-thru service from an existing fast food facility in accordance with the Commercial General District (CG) standards After presentation of the staff report, Chairman Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 3:04 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chairman Edgar closed the Public Hearing at 3:04 p.m. Mr. Hoesterey asked staff if Newport Avenue contained an island prohibiting left-hand turns from that location. Mr. Ledendecker responded, affirmatively. Planning A~ency Minutes September 7, 1982 Page 2 Mr. Greinke questioned if the requirement for installation of marbelite street lights was standard. Mr. Brotemarkle stated it was. Mr. Hoesterey moved approval of Use Permit 82-21 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2052. Mr. Greinke seconded. Motion .carried: 3-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY None KENNEDY, SALTARELLI 3. USE PERMIT 82-22 Applicant: Location: Request: Arthur Johnson on behalf of Goldwyn Enterprises 151Tustin Avenue Authorization to operate a deli .restaurant with forty-five {45) seats Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report recommending continuance of the hearing based on concerns over certain Uniform Building Code requirements. Chairman Edgar called for anyone wishing to speak and seeing no one directed staff to present minutes of previous meetings pertaining to this property at the continued hearing. Mr. Greinke moved continuance of the Public Hearing on Use Permit 82-22. Mr. Hoesterey seconded. Motion carried: 3-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY None KENNEDY, SALTARELLI 4. USE PERMIT 82-23 Applicant: Location: Request: Elizabeth Howard on behalf of Elizabeth Howard Curtain Call Dinner Theatre 690 E1Camino Real (El Camino Plaza) Authorization to install a freeway identification sign Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report stating the applicant was also requesting the authority to move the sign, if approved, to the westerly side of the building if an office building is built, as had previously been proposed. Chairman Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 3:07 p.m. Robert Howard, Rolling Hills Estates, spoke in favor of the application stating the dinner theatre needed the freeway exposure and the sign was similar to the one now in place. Chairman Edgar closed the Public Hearing at 3:10 p.m. Mr. Hoesterey moved approval of Use Permit 82-23 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2054. Motion carried: 3-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY None KENNEDY, SALTARELLI 5. ZONE CHANGE 82-3 Applicant: Location: Initiated by City Council South side of Main Street between "B" and "C" Streets. Property runs southerly from Main on "B" for 366 feet and southerly from Main on "C" for 304 feet Planning Agency Minutes September 7, 1982 Page 3 Request: To change the zone designation from Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) to Professional Office (PR) District After presentation of the staff re~ort, Chairman Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 3:11 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chairman Edgar closed the Public Hearing at 3:11 p.m. Mr. Hoesterey moved adoption of Resolution No. 2053 recommending to the City Council, approval of Zone Change 82-3. Motion carried: 3-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 6. VARIANCE 82-9 Applicant: Location: Request: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY None KENNEDY, SALTARELLI Robert & Maralys Wills 175 South "C" Street Authorization to vary with parking standards in conjunction' with the construction of a professional office building Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report stating the correct number of spaces required for the use was 15.6, or 16, for 4,684 square feet. Fifteen spaces are provided but the applicant had indicated he was willing to keep the building to a maximum of 4,500 square feet and within the parking requirements. Staff noted that this item was related to the request for alley abandonment from Mr. Wills and Mr. Perfit to be considered later in the agenda. The single parking space requested for waiver by this variance would be provided upon vacation of the 10 ft. by 50 ft. strip to Mr. Wills. Mr. Hoesterey questioned staff regarding the ratio of compact parking spaces at 53% instead of 20%. Mr. Brotemarkle responded the 20% limit on compact was a resolution, not a code requirement and the Agency has allowed greater use of compact spaces within structures as opposed to uncontrolled parking lots. The spaces were various widths of 7'6", 8', 9', 10' and 14', which averaged to the minimum requirements. This was done to accommodate the supports for the office structure above. Chairman Edgar questioned staff regarding building height. Mr. Brotemarkle stated the peak height was 44 ft., about a foot lower than the adjacent Blanco building; however, the Spanish motiff made use of a gable roof style for the tile, reducing the "C" Street elevation to under 40 ft. Chairman Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 3:20 p.m. Dr. Walter Fl aherty, 190 E1 Camino, asked if abandonment of the alley would prohibit Mr. Perfit's tenants from storing vehicles behind 170 E1 Camino. Mr. Brotemarkle indicated he would still have access to the rear of that lot across the alley on the property he owns at 180 E1 Camino. However, Mr. Wills's proposed project would be separated from the alley by a wall. The Public Hearing was closed at 3:24 p.m. Mr. Hoesterey moved denial of Variance 82-9 based on inadequate parking. Mr. Greinke seconded stating he felt the project was overdevelopment of the property and he would prefer a more appropriate design. After Agency and staff discussion regarding the size of the building and parking space size, the Agency's approval 6f the architectural theme, and abandonment of the alley, Mr. Greinke offered a substitute Planning Agency Minutes September 7, 1982 Page 4 motion to continue the Public Hearing and consider a new design. Chairman Edgar seconded. Motion carried: 3-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PUBLIC CONCERNS: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY None KENNEDY, SALTARELLI None OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: 1. Final Tract Map 11336 Applicant: Location: Cai-State Associates 1651 Mitchell Mr. Greinke moved adoption of Resolution No. 2055 recommending to the City Council, approval of Final Tract Map 11336 Motion carried: 3-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY None KENNEDY, SALTARELLI 2. ALLEY VACATION & ABANDONMENT Location: Alley right-of-way between E1Camino Real & "C" Street After presentation of the staff report the Agency and staff discussed vacation of the alley as opposed to sale of the property. Mr. Rourke stated the City was not allowed to sell the property, which had been dedicated with no reimbursement to the original owner. Chairman Edqar questioned if vacation of the alley was an appropriate legal action'to take before approving the project which requested the vacation. Mr. Rourke stated it was. Mr. Greinke moved to continue this item. Mr. Hoesterey seconded in light of their continuance of the variance request. Walter Fl aherty, questioned what affect the abandonment would have on his property. Chairman Edgar stated that if the alley was totally abandoned, the portion adjoining Mr. Fl aherty's property would be returned to his parcel. He was in support of abandonment since that was the reason for putting the sewer line over to "C" Street. Mr. Robert Wills spoke is opposition to continuance stating his project (Variance 82-9) depended on the Agency's decision regarding the alley. The single space requested for waiver is proposed to be provided in the area of the alley. Mr. Greinke withdrew his motion for continuance and offered a substitute motion to approve the vacation and abadonment of the alley. Mr. Hoesterey seconded. Motion carried: 3-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY None KENNEDY, SALTARELLI STAFF CONCERNS: None Planning Agency Minutes September 7, 1982 Page 5 AGENCY CONCERNS: None ADJOURNEMENT: At 3:44 p.m. to next regular meeting. Richard B. Edgar, Chai~lnan MINUTES (3~ A RBI~Ur.a~ I~m'~'TING OF '.m~ REI)~vm~3PM~I~T .~-~NCY T~ C~T~ C~ T~STIN, C~'T.T3~:)I~T-A SeF*-,~her ?, 19e2 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Edgar at 3:44 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. Agency Members Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey Kennedy, Saltarelli Jam~s G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, Kxec. Director/City Manager Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk' Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Mike Brot~m~rkle, Comm. Dev. Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Norman Hower, Traffic Engineer R. Kenneth Fleagle, Consultant Approximately 10 in ~he audience It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the ~uLnutes of August 16, 1982. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to approve General Demands for the month of August, 1982, in the ~mount of $112,070.96 as recommended by the Director of Finance. Motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 81 5. FISCAL ~ 1982-83 BODG~ - I~SOLUTIO~ ~O. ~DA 82--6 AS reco~unended by the City Manager, it was moved by HOesterey, seconded by Greinke, to adopt ~he following resolution: RESOLOTIO~ NO. ~DA 82-6 - A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency, ADOPTING THE AGENCY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE AGENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982-83. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 29 The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recommenda- tion. Mr. Greinke stated he brought this matter up because he was con- cerned about safety and liability to the City. He is still concerned about safety and feels that a better job of maintenance and keeping the area clear, which the contractor has done, is something that should be monitored. The Director of Public Works responded that the contractor initially assumes full liability for any accidents that may happen on the job. Chairman Edgar commented that no Agency action is needed on the rmatter, and the report was received and filed by unanimous informal con- sent. 95 7. ADOPTIO~ 0~ PROJECT PRIORITIES The Executive Director presented the staff report which was handed out to Agency members. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to establish the following list of priorities: 1) General Property Acquisition for Resale - $1,800,000; 2) Property Acquisition for Sr. Citizen Housing - $200,000; 3) Columbus Tustin Community Center - $1,000,000; REDE~r~LOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Page 2, 9-7-82 4) Underground utilities for the specific area bounded by Holt, Irvine and Newport triangle and continuing southerly on New~por~ to Larwin Square - $750,000; 5) Additional Parking Structure in the Downtown Area - $1,000,000; 6) Sink a New Well for Water System & Replace Inadequate Pipes - $500,000; and 7) Repayment of Debt to City of Tustin - $1,125,000. Total - Approximately $6,500,000 Agency discussion followed. The Executive Director responded to Agency concerns pertaining to prematurity of issui, ng bonds at this point; flexi- bility of adding/deleting priorities after issuance of bonds; the con- straint of spending bond money within three years; and indicating the status of planning activity by project. In accordance with Mr. Greinke's request, the motion was amended by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterev, that the priorities as listed above be identified and the matter be continued to the September 20, 1982, meeting when all Agency members are present to react to subject priority list. Motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that as far as the cash balance of the Agency, that the Agency direct inclusion of the Prospect Avenue storm drain ($84,000) and the upgrading of the traffic signal at First and Prospect ($55,000) to be funded from current Redevelopment finances. The Executive Director indicated staff could address this matter at the next Agency meeting, and the MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN. As requested by the Executive Director, this matter was continued to the Septem2oer 20 meeting by unanimous informal consent. 81 It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterev, to adjourn at 4:05 p.m. to the next regular meeting on September 20, 1982. Carried 3-0, Kennedy a~d Saltarelli absent. OF ~HE T~STIN u~'rX C0~NCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way Septe. d:x~r 7, 1982 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 4:05 p.m. II. Council~Dereons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey Kennedy, saltarelli James G. Rourke, City Attorney william A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Mike Brot~m~rkle, Comm. Dev. Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Norman Hower, Traffic Engineer R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Approximately 10 in the audience III. p~?.TC ~S walter Flaherty stated he feels progress is slow pertaining to the E1 Camino Real/Main Street Improvements project and complained that M. H. Communication Company has further slowed progress on t_he proj- ect. The Director of Public Works responded that M. H. Communica- tion is the field contractor for the cable television franchise and was urged by the City to complete installation on E1 Camino Real/ Main Street prior to the final street paving. The Director indi- cated that the project is very complex, and the contractor is only about 3 days behind schedule. Mayor Edgar noted that the contract contains a penalty/bonus clause as incentive for the contractor to complete the project on schedule. The Director responded to Mr. Flaherty's other concerns. IV. CO~SENT CALENDA~ It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 1. APP~OFAL OF ~Q~=r~S - SeptemBer 1, 1982; August 31, 1982; August 30, 1982; and August 16, 1982. 2. APPN~VAL (~ DEMANDS in the amount of $1,011,798.48. R~TIFICATIO~ C~ P~ in the amount of $191,659.76. 5O 3® RESOLOTION NO. 82-71 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of T~stin, California, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE ROBERTI-Z'BE~ URBAN OPEN-SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM Adoption of Resolution No. 82-71 as recommended by the Director of Community Services. 77 BSSOLUTIC~ NO. 82-76 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN ALLEY BETWEEN EL CARINO REAL AND "C" STREET AND NORTHERLY OF SECOND STREET AND TO FIX A TIME AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING THEREON Adoption of Resolution No. 82-76 as recommended by City Engineer. 105 RESOLUTION NO. 82-73 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING FINAL TRACT NO. 11336 LOCATED AT 1651 MITCHELL AVENUE Adoption of Resolution No. 82-73 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 99 CITY COUNCIL M~NUTES Page 2, 9-7-82 '7. ~ES~F~TIO~ NO. 82-74 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING ~ECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (FY-1981-82 Handicapped Ramp Construction Program - Nobest, Inc. ) Adoption of Resolution No. 82-74 and if no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of recordation of the Notice of Completion, authorize palanent of the final 10% retention amount as recommended by the Engineering Depart- ment. 92 RES0~UTIO~ NO. 82-75 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, OPPOSING PROPOSITION 13, THE INITIA- TIVE MEASURE ENTITLED "WATER RESOURCES, STATUTORY INITIATIVE." Adoption of Resolution No. 82-75 as recommended by the City Engineer · 107 I~ FOR RESTRIt;~.'~.m P~G AT 15520 'l~rIN VTT.?,J~GE ~ Authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-street parking during street sweeping hours on Tustin Village Way adjacent to 15520 Tustin Village Way and that warnings be issued in lieu of citations for the first 30 days after the sign installation as recommended by the City Engineer. 75 V. O~DINANCE I~r~OD~CTIO~ 1. FOR O~DINA~CE NO. 875 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE TO THE REGULATION OF SECURITY BUSINESSES The City Manager responded to Counci3m~n Hoesterey that false alarm fees would be an administrative matter; i.e., the ordi- nance would permit the Police Chief to determine the policy on same. Councilman Greinke felt the ordinance is discriminatory by differentiating between residents and businesses; and there is no provision for alarms triggered by telphone signals. Following further discussion, it was moved by Hoesterey, secon- ded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 875 have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. Following reading of the title by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 875 be introduced. Mayor Edgar suggested that Councilman Greinke list his concerns so that the Police Chief can respond to same at the next meet- ing. Kathy Well, 1702 Summerville, commented that the ordinance is perhaps addressing businesses with automatic alarm systems that are hardwired directly into the Police Department, and there are probably very few residents (if any) with such sophisticated alarm systems. She agreed it would be helpful to have the Police Chief present to address concerns. Motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 82 VI. OLD BUSINESS 1. Mx~N =-rua~z- - BRYAN Av~u= SP~wn ~E =£uuY & ORDINANCE NO. 873 The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in his ~o dated August 25, 1982. Council/staff discussion followed on methods for decreasing the speed limit on Main Street. Agnes Bacon was recognized by Council and suggested installation of a narrow divider on Main Street to prevent passing by speeding traffic. CITY ~0UNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 9-7-82 It was then moved by Hoestere¥~ seconded by Greinke, to continue the matter to the September 20 meeting for input from the Police Chief and alternatives of restriping t_he street or altering the physical nature of the street. Councilman Greinke requested that staff prepare a report which can be forwarded by Council to the League of California Cities requesting changes in the law that has made it difficult to set the speed limit on Main Street to 30 mph. Following further discussion, the .motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 100 VII. B~INES~ 1. FI~T ANNIFAL ~ ~Ox~S' PICNIC Councilman Greinke offered kudos and appreciation to A~m~ nistra- rive Secretary Donna Treat and all staff members who helped in making the August 29, 1982, City Employees' Picnic a success. In response to Councilman Hoesterey's concern, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoestere¥, to authorize the Mayor to send a letter (supplemented by a Mailgram) to Governor Brown urging him to veto the bill which would take away the power of local cities to control the sale of fireworks. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. Councilman Greinke suggested that a letter be sent to all Orange County city councils requesting their support of. Tustin's posi- tion on the matter. Co~ncilman Hoesterey suggested that if there are statistics on reduction of accidents or hospital calls due to fireworks that further correspondence be sent. 3. G~an ,~¥~u~ -~ING - CH~XSTIAN TEMPORARX mUSING FACILITX Mayor Edgar reported that a report from Police Chief Thayer indicated that there is merit to the request by Christian Tempo- rary Housing Facility for revenue sharing funds. The City Man- ager stated the matter will be agendized for the September 20 meeting. 4. SOU"A~/~.2m','"A~ i~,D,~vm~OPM~i~ A~2~A In response to Mayor Edgar, the City Manager reported that information received from the consultant on this item will be provided at the September 20 meeting. VIII. ~CESS - At 4:51 p.m. it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoestere¥, to recess to the 7:30 p.m. session. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Salta- relli absent. T. (?.,~T.T. TO ~ CIT~ COUNCIL ~K~L'~/~G ~ECC~ED 7:30 PM ~K~ING The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:32 p.m. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey Kennedy, Saltarelli James G. Rourke, City Attorney william A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Cn~m. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Ron Nault, Finance Director CIT~/ COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 9-7-82 III · P~BI~IC C~CE~NS None. IV. PUBX~C ~aW/~GS 1. ZOSFE MANGE 82--2, O~DINANCE ~O. 878 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF CER- TAIN PgDPERTIES FROM C-1 TO CG DISTRICT AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF NEWPORT AVENUE AND MITCHELL AVENUE (Taco Bell) The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation. The public hearing was opened at 7:33 p.m. There being no com- ments or objections, t_he public hearing was closed and it was moved b~ Hoestere¥, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 878 have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 878 by the City Clerk, it was ~oved by Hoestere?, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 878 be introduced. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 110 ~ ~Ai~G~ 82-3, O~DIN~/~CE NO. 876 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET BETWEEN "B" AND "C" STREETS SOUTHERLY FROM MAIN ON "B" FOR 36 FEET AND SOUTHERLY FROM MAIN ON "C" FOR 304 FEET,' FROM THE MULTIPLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) DISTR/CT TO THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PR) DISTRICT (Stevens Square) The C~unity Development Director presented the staff report and recom~/endation. The public hearing was opened at 7:34 p.m. There being no com- ments or objections, the public hearing was closed and it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 876 have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 876 by the City Clerk, it was moved b~ Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 876 be introduced. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 1~0 P~OPOSITI~ 4 - ~/~PROPPJ~kTI~ *.TM_TTATIO~ FISCAL ~ 1982-83, P~I~ NO. 82-70 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, DETEBMINING AND ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEA~ 1982-83, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND SECTION 7910 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE The public hearing was opened at 7:36 p.m. There being no comments or objections, the public hearing was closed and it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt Resolution No. 82-70 which sets the City of Tustin's 1982-83 appropriation limit at $11,695,561. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 29 4e ZONE MANGE 82--4, O~DINANCE NO. 877 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 17311 and 17341 MCFADDEN STREET FROM MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) DISTRICT TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CG-PUD) DISTRICT The Community Development Director presented the staff report and reco~nendation. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 9-7-82 B 0-~ i'NF.S S 1. The public hearing was opened at 7:37 p.m. There being no com- ments or objections, =he public hearing was closed and it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 877 have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 877 by the City Clerk, it was moved b~ Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 877 be introduced. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 110 VI. ADJOUP/~NT It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere¥, that staff be given the option to judge when Public Hearings are noncontro- versial and then can be scheduled for the 3:00 p.m. meeting. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 83 It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Greinke, to adjourn a= 7:40 p.m. to a Workshop on September 13, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. in the Coun- cil Chambers for consideration of the Planning Commission and thence to the next regular meeting on Septeu~ber 20, 1982. Carried.