HomeMy WebLinkAboutP.C. MINUTES 09-07-82TUSTIN PLANNING AGENCY
Minutes of Regular Meeting
September 7, 1982
The Planning Agency held a regular meeting Tuesday, September 7, 1982,
at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 300 Centennial
Way, Tustin, California.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Edgar at 3:00 p.m.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Hoesterey and the invocation
was given by Chairman Edgar.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Also present:
MINUTES
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey,
Kennedy, Saltarelli
William Huston, City Manager
Michael Brotemarkle, Community Development Director
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
James Rourke, City Attorney
Janet Hester, Recording Secretary
The minutes of the regular meeting held August 16, 1982, were approved
as submitted.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. ZONE CHANGE 82-4
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Initiated by City Council
17311, 17341 McFadden
To change the zone designation from Multiple Family
Residential {R-3) to Commercial General-Planned Unit
Development (CG-PUD)
After presentation of the staff report, Chairman Edgar opened the
Public Hearing at 3:03 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chairman
Edgar closed the Public Hearing at 3:03 p.m.
Mr. Hoesterey moved adoption of Resolution No. 2051 recommending
approval of Zone Change 82-4 to the City Council. Mr. Greinke
seconded.
Motion carried: 4-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
2. USE PERMIT 82-21
EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY
None
KENNEDY, SALTARELLI
Applicant:
Location:
Request;
Taco Bell on behalf of Realty Income Properties
14232 Newport Avenue (C-1 District)
Authorization to provide drive-thru service from an
existing fast food facility in accordance with the
Commercial General District (CG) standards
After presentation of the staff report, Chairman Edgar opened the
Public Hearing at 3:04 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chairman
Edgar closed the Public Hearing at 3:04 p.m.
Mr. Hoesterey asked staff if Newport Avenue contained an island
prohibiting left-hand turns from that location. Mr. Ledendecker
responded, affirmatively.
Planning A~ency Minutes
September 7, 1982
Page 2
Mr. Greinke questioned if the requirement for installation of
marbelite street lights was standard. Mr. Brotemarkle stated it was.
Mr. Hoesterey moved approval of Use Permit 82-21 by the adoption of
Resolution No. 2052. Mr. Greinke seconded.
Motion .carried: 3-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY
None
KENNEDY, SALTARELLI
3. USE PERMIT 82-22
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Arthur Johnson on behalf of Goldwyn Enterprises
151Tustin Avenue
Authorization to operate a deli .restaurant with
forty-five {45) seats
Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report recommending continuance of
the hearing based on concerns over certain Uniform Building Code
requirements.
Chairman Edgar called for anyone wishing to speak and seeing no one
directed staff to present minutes of previous meetings pertaining to
this property at the continued hearing.
Mr. Greinke moved continuance of the Public Hearing on Use Permit
82-22. Mr. Hoesterey seconded.
Motion carried: 3-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY
None
KENNEDY, SALTARELLI
4. USE PERMIT 82-23
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Elizabeth Howard on behalf of Elizabeth Howard Curtain
Call Dinner Theatre
690 E1Camino Real (El Camino Plaza)
Authorization to install a freeway identification sign
Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report stating the applicant was
also requesting the authority to move the sign, if approved, to the
westerly side of the building if an office building is built, as had
previously been proposed.
Chairman Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 3:07 p.m.
Robert Howard, Rolling Hills Estates, spoke in favor of the
application stating the dinner theatre needed the freeway exposure and
the sign was similar to the one now in place.
Chairman Edgar closed the Public Hearing at 3:10 p.m.
Mr. Hoesterey moved approval of Use Permit 82-23 by the adoption of
Resolution No. 2054.
Motion carried: 3-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY
None
KENNEDY, SALTARELLI
5. ZONE CHANGE 82-3
Applicant:
Location:
Initiated by City Council
South side of Main Street between "B" and "C"
Streets. Property runs southerly from Main on "B" for
366 feet and southerly from Main on "C" for 304 feet
Planning Agency Minutes
September 7, 1982
Page 3
Request:
To change the zone designation from Multiple-Family
Residential (R-3) to Professional Office (PR) District
After presentation of the staff re~ort, Chairman Edgar opened the
Public Hearing at 3:11 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chairman
Edgar closed the Public Hearing at 3:11 p.m.
Mr. Hoesterey moved adoption of Resolution No. 2053 recommending to
the City Council, approval of Zone Change 82-3.
Motion carried: 3-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
6. VARIANCE 82-9
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY
None
KENNEDY, SALTARELLI
Robert & Maralys Wills
175 South "C" Street
Authorization to vary with parking standards in
conjunction' with the construction of a professional
office building
Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report stating the correct number
of spaces required for the use was 15.6, or 16, for 4,684 square
feet. Fifteen spaces are provided but the applicant had indicated he
was willing to keep the building to a maximum of 4,500 square feet and
within the parking requirements.
Staff noted that this item was related to the request for alley
abandonment from Mr. Wills and Mr. Perfit to be considered later in
the agenda. The single parking space requested for waiver by this
variance would be provided upon vacation of the 10 ft. by 50 ft. strip
to Mr. Wills.
Mr. Hoesterey questioned staff regarding the ratio of compact parking
spaces at 53% instead of 20%. Mr. Brotemarkle responded the 20% limit
on compact was a resolution, not a code requirement and the Agency has
allowed greater use of compact spaces within structures as opposed to
uncontrolled parking lots. The spaces were various widths of 7'6",
8', 9', 10' and 14', which averaged to the minimum requirements. This
was done to accommodate the supports for the office structure above.
Chairman Edgar questioned staff regarding building height. Mr.
Brotemarkle stated the peak height was 44 ft., about a foot lower than
the adjacent Blanco building; however, the Spanish motiff made use of
a gable roof style for the tile, reducing the "C" Street elevation to
under 40 ft.
Chairman Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 3:20 p.m.
Dr. Walter Fl aherty, 190 E1 Camino, asked if abandonment of the alley
would prohibit Mr. Perfit's tenants from storing vehicles behind 170
E1 Camino. Mr. Brotemarkle indicated he would still have access to
the rear of that lot across the alley on the property he owns at 180
E1 Camino. However, Mr. Wills's proposed project would be separated
from the alley by a wall.
The Public Hearing was closed at 3:24 p.m.
Mr. Hoesterey moved denial of Variance 82-9 based on inadequate
parking. Mr. Greinke seconded stating he felt the project was
overdevelopment of the property and he would prefer a more appropriate
design.
After Agency and staff discussion regarding the size of the building
and parking space size, the Agency's approval 6f the architectural
theme, and abandonment of the alley, Mr. Greinke offered a substitute
Planning Agency Minutes
September 7, 1982
Page 4
motion to continue the Public Hearing and consider a new design.
Chairman Edgar seconded.
Motion carried: 3-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY
None
KENNEDY, SALTARELLI
None
OLD BUSINESS:
None
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Final Tract Map 11336
Applicant:
Location:
Cai-State Associates
1651 Mitchell
Mr. Greinke moved adoption of Resolution No. 2055 recommending to the
City Council, approval of Final Tract Map 11336
Motion carried: 3-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY
None
KENNEDY, SALTARELLI
2. ALLEY VACATION & ABANDONMENT
Location:
Alley right-of-way between E1Camino Real & "C" Street
After presentation of the staff report the Agency and staff discussed
vacation of the alley as opposed to sale of the property. Mr. Rourke
stated the City was not allowed to sell the property, which had been
dedicated with no reimbursement to the original owner. Chairman Edqar
questioned if vacation of the alley was an appropriate legal action'to
take before approving the project which requested the vacation. Mr.
Rourke stated it was.
Mr. Greinke moved to continue this item. Mr. Hoesterey seconded in
light of their continuance of the variance request.
Walter Fl aherty, questioned what affect the abandonment would have on
his property. Chairman Edgar stated that if the alley was totally
abandoned, the portion adjoining Mr. Fl aherty's property would be
returned to his parcel. He was in support of abandonment since that
was the reason for putting the sewer line over to "C" Street.
Mr. Robert Wills spoke is opposition to continuance stating his
project (Variance 82-9) depended on the Agency's decision regarding
the alley. The single space requested for waiver is proposed to be
provided in the area of the alley.
Mr. Greinke withdrew his motion for continuance and offered a
substitute motion to approve the vacation and abadonment of the
alley. Mr. Hoesterey seconded.
Motion carried: 3-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
EDGAR, GREINKE, HOESTEREY
None
KENNEDY, SALTARELLI
STAFF CONCERNS:
None
Planning Agency Minutes
September 7, 1982
Page 5
AGENCY CONCERNS:
None
ADJOURNEMENT:
At 3:44 p.m. to next regular meeting.
Richard B. Edgar, Chai~lnan
MINUTES (3~ A RBI~Ur.a~ I~m'~'TING
OF '.m~ REI)~vm~3PM~I~T .~-~NCY
T~ C~T~ C~ T~STIN, C~'T.T3~:)I~T-A
SeF*-,~her ?, 19e2
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Edgar at 3:44 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
Agency Members Present:
Agency Members Absent:
Others Present:
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey
Kennedy, Saltarelli
Jam~s G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, Kxec. Director/City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk'
Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk
Mike Brot~m~rkle, Comm. Dev. Director
Ronald Nault, Finance Director
Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director
Royleen White, Community Services Director
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Norman Hower, Traffic Engineer
R. Kenneth Fleagle, Consultant
Approximately 10 in ~he audience
It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the ~uLnutes of
August 16, 1982. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to approve General Demands
for the month of August, 1982, in the ~mount of $112,070.96 as recommended
by the Director of Finance. Motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli
absent. 81
5. FISCAL ~ 1982-83 BODG~ - I~SOLUTIO~ ~O. ~DA 82--6
AS reco~unended by the City Manager, it was moved by HOesterey, seconded by
Greinke, to adopt ~he following resolution:
RESOLOTIO~ NO. ~DA 82-6 - A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the
Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency, ADOPTING THE AGENCY BUDGET AND
APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE AGENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982-83.
Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent.
29
The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recommenda-
tion. Mr. Greinke stated he brought this matter up because he was con-
cerned about safety and liability to the City. He is still concerned
about safety and feels that a better job of maintenance and keeping the
area clear, which the contractor has done, is something that should be
monitored. The Director of Public Works responded that the contractor
initially assumes full liability for any accidents that may happen on the
job. Chairman Edgar commented that no Agency action is needed on the
rmatter, and the report was received and filed by unanimous informal con-
sent. 95
7. ADOPTIO~ 0~ PROJECT PRIORITIES
The Executive Director presented the staff report which was handed out to
Agency members. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to
establish the following list of priorities:
1) General Property Acquisition for Resale - $1,800,000;
2) Property Acquisition for Sr. Citizen Housing - $200,000;
3) Columbus Tustin Community Center - $1,000,000;
REDE~r~LOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
Page 2, 9-7-82
4) Underground utilities for the specific area bounded by Holt, Irvine
and Newport triangle and continuing southerly on New~por~ to Larwin
Square - $750,000;
5) Additional Parking Structure in the Downtown Area - $1,000,000;
6) Sink a New Well for Water System & Replace Inadequate Pipes -
$500,000; and
7) Repayment of Debt to City of Tustin - $1,125,000.
Total - Approximately $6,500,000
Agency discussion followed. The Executive Director responded to Agency
concerns pertaining to prematurity of issui, ng bonds at this point; flexi-
bility of adding/deleting priorities after issuance of bonds; the con-
straint of spending bond money within three years; and indicating the
status of planning activity by project.
In accordance with Mr. Greinke's request, the motion was amended by Edgar,
seconded by Hoesterev, that the priorities as listed above be identified
and the matter be continued to the September 20, 1982, meeting when all
Agency members are present to react to subject priority list.
Motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent.
It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that as far as the cash
balance of the Agency, that the Agency direct inclusion of the Prospect
Avenue storm drain ($84,000) and the upgrading of the traffic signal at
First and Prospect ($55,000) to be funded from current Redevelopment
finances.
The Executive Director indicated staff could address this matter at the
next Agency meeting, and the MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN.
As requested by the Executive Director, this matter was continued to the
Septem2oer 20 meeting by unanimous informal consent. 81
It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterev, to adjourn at 4:05 p.m. to
the next regular meeting on September 20, 1982. Carried 3-0, Kennedy a~d
Saltarelli absent.
OF ~HE T~STIN u~'rX C0~NCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 Centennial Way
Septe. d:x~r 7, 1982
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 4:05 p.m.
II.
Council~Dereons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey
Kennedy, saltarelli
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
william A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk
Mike Brot~m~rkle, Comm. Dev. Director
Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director
Ronald Nault, Finance Director
Royleen White, Community Services Director
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Norman Hower, Traffic Engineer
R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant
Approximately 10 in the audience
III. p~?.TC
~S
walter Flaherty stated he feels progress is slow pertaining to the
E1 Camino Real/Main Street Improvements project and complained that
M. H. Communication Company has further slowed progress on t_he proj-
ect. The Director of Public Works responded that M. H. Communica-
tion is the field contractor for the cable television franchise and
was urged by the City to complete installation on E1 Camino Real/
Main Street prior to the final street paving. The Director indi-
cated that the project is very complex, and the contractor is only
about 3 days behind schedule. Mayor Edgar noted that the contract
contains a penalty/bonus clause as incentive for the contractor to
complete the project on schedule. The Director responded to Mr.
Flaherty's other concerns.
IV. CO~SENT
CALENDA~ It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the
entire Consent Calendar. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli
absent.
1. APP~OFAL OF ~Q~=r~S - SeptemBer 1, 1982; August 31, 1982;
August 30, 1982; and August 16, 1982.
2. APPN~VAL (~ DEMANDS in the amount of $1,011,798.48.
R~TIFICATIO~ C~ P~ in the amount of $191,659.76.
5O
3®
RESOLOTION NO. 82-71 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of T~stin, California, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT
FUNDS UNDER THE ROBERTI-Z'BE~ URBAN OPEN-SPACE AND RECREATION
PROGRAM
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-71 as recommended by the
Director of Community Services. 77
BSSOLUTIC~ NO. 82-76 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A
PORTION OF AN ALLEY BETWEEN EL CARINO REAL AND "C" STREET AND
NORTHERLY OF SECOND STREET AND TO FIX A TIME AND PLACE OF PUBLIC
HEARING THEREON
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-76 as recommended by City
Engineer. 105
RESOLUTION NO. 82-73 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, APPROVING FINAL TRACT NO. 11336 LOCATED AT 1651
MITCHELL AVENUE
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-73 as recommended by the Com-
munity Development Department. 99
CITY COUNCIL M~NUTES
Page 2, 9-7-82
'7.
~ES~F~TIO~ NO. 82-74 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING
~ECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (FY-1981-82 Handicapped Ramp
Construction Program - Nobest, Inc. )
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-74 and if no claims or stop
payment notices are filed within 30 days of recordation of
the Notice of Completion, authorize palanent of the final 10%
retention amount as recommended by the Engineering Depart-
ment. 92
RES0~UTIO~ NO. 82-75 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, OPPOSING PROPOSITION 13, THE INITIA-
TIVE MEASURE ENTITLED "WATER RESOURCES, STATUTORY INITIATIVE."
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-75 as recommended by the City
Engineer · 107
I~ FOR RESTRIt;~.'~.m P~G AT 15520 'l~rIN VTT.?,J~GE ~
Authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-street
parking during street sweeping hours on Tustin Village Way
adjacent to 15520 Tustin Village Way and that warnings be
issued in lieu of citations for the first 30 days after the
sign installation as recommended by the City Engineer.
75
V. O~DINANCE
I~r~OD~CTIO~
1.
FOR
O~DINA~CE NO. 875 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City
of Tustin, California, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE TO
THE REGULATION OF SECURITY BUSINESSES
The City Manager responded to Counci3m~n Hoesterey that false
alarm fees would be an administrative matter; i.e., the ordi-
nance would permit the Police Chief to determine the policy on
same. Councilman Greinke felt the ordinance is discriminatory
by differentiating between residents and businesses; and there
is no provision for alarms triggered by telphone signals.
Following further discussion, it was moved by Hoesterey, secon-
ded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 875 have first reading by title
only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent.
Following reading of the title by the City Clerk, it was moved
by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 875 be
introduced.
Mayor Edgar suggested that Councilman Greinke list his concerns
so that the Police Chief can respond to same at the next meet-
ing.
Kathy Well, 1702 Summerville, commented that the ordinance is
perhaps addressing businesses with automatic alarm systems that
are hardwired directly into the Police Department, and there are
probably very few residents (if any) with such sophisticated
alarm systems. She agreed it would be helpful to have the
Police Chief present to address concerns.
Motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent.
82
VI. OLD
BUSINESS
1. Mx~N =-rua~z- - BRYAN Av~u= SP~wn ~E =£uuY & ORDINANCE NO. 873
The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and
recommendation as contained in his ~o dated August 25, 1982.
Council/staff discussion followed on methods for decreasing the
speed limit on Main Street.
Agnes Bacon was recognized by Council and suggested installation
of a narrow divider on Main Street to prevent passing by
speeding traffic.
CITY ~0UNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 9-7-82
It was then moved by Hoestere¥~ seconded by Greinke, to continue
the matter to the September 20 meeting for input from the Police
Chief and alternatives of restriping t_he street or altering the
physical nature of the street.
Councilman Greinke requested that staff prepare a report which
can be forwarded by Council to the League of California Cities
requesting changes in the law that has made it difficult to set
the speed limit on Main Street to 30 mph.
Following further discussion, the .motion carried 3-0, Kennedy
and Saltarelli absent. 100
VII.
B~INES~
1.
FI~T ANNIFAL ~ ~Ox~S' PICNIC
Councilman Greinke offered kudos and appreciation to A~m~ nistra-
rive Secretary Donna Treat and all staff members who helped in
making the August 29, 1982, City Employees' Picnic a success.
In response to Councilman Hoesterey's concern, it was moved by
Greinke, seconded by Hoestere¥, to authorize the Mayor to send a
letter (supplemented by a Mailgram) to Governor Brown urging him
to veto the bill which would take away the power of local cities
to control the sale of fireworks. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and
Saltarelli absent.
Councilman Greinke suggested that a letter be sent to all Orange
County city councils requesting their support of. Tustin's posi-
tion on the matter. Co~ncilman Hoesterey suggested that if
there are statistics on reduction of accidents or hospital calls
due to fireworks that further correspondence be sent.
3. G~an ,~¥~u~ -~ING - CH~XSTIAN TEMPORARX mUSING FACILITX
Mayor Edgar reported that a report from Police Chief Thayer
indicated that there is merit to the request by Christian Tempo-
rary Housing Facility for revenue sharing funds. The City Man-
ager stated the matter will be agendized for the September 20
meeting.
4. SOU"A~/~.2m','"A~ i~,D,~vm~OPM~i~ A~2~A
In response to Mayor Edgar, the City Manager reported that
information received from the consultant on this item will be
provided at the September 20 meeting.
VIII. ~CESS -
At 4:51 p.m. it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoestere¥, to
recess to the 7:30 p.m. session. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Salta-
relli absent.
T. (?.,~T.T.
TO ~
CIT~ COUNCIL ~K~L'~/~G ~ECC~ED
7:30 PM ~K~ING
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:32 p.m.
Councilpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey
Kennedy, Saltarelli
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
william A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Mike Brotemarkle, Cn~m. Dev. Director
Bob Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
Ron Nault, Finance Director
CIT~/ COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 9-7-82
III · P~BI~IC
C~CE~NS
None.
IV. PUBX~C
~aW/~GS 1.
ZOSFE MANGE 82--2, O~DINANCE ~O. 878 - An Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF CER-
TAIN PgDPERTIES FROM C-1 TO CG DISTRICT AT THE NORTHEASTERLY
CORNER OF NEWPORT AVENUE AND MITCHELL AVENUE (Taco Bell)
The Community Development Director presented the staff report
and recommendation.
The public hearing was opened at 7:33 p.m. There being no com-
ments or objections, t_he public hearing was closed and it was
moved b~ Hoestere¥, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 878
have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and
Saltarelli absent.
Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 878 by the
City Clerk, it was ~oved by Hoestere?, seconded by Greinke, that
Ordinance No. 878 be introduced. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and
Saltarelli absent. 110
~ ~Ai~G~ 82-3, O~DIN~/~CE NO. 876 - An Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET BETWEEN "B"
AND "C" STREETS SOUTHERLY FROM MAIN ON "B" FOR 36 FEET AND
SOUTHERLY FROM MAIN ON "C" FOR 304 FEET,' FROM THE MULTIPLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) DISTR/CT TO THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
(PR) DISTRICT (Stevens Square)
The C~unity Development Director presented the staff report
and recom~/endation.
The public hearing was opened at 7:34 p.m. There being no com-
ments or objections, the public hearing was closed and it was
moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 876
have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and
Saltarelli absent.
Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 876 by the
City Clerk, it was moved b~ Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, that
Ordinance No. 876 be introduced. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and
Saltarelli absent. 1~0
P~OPOSITI~ 4 - ~/~PROPPJ~kTI~ *.TM_TTATIO~ FISCAL ~ 1982-83,
P~I~ NO. 82-70 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, DETEBMINING AND ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR THE FISCAL YEA~ 1982-83, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIIB OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND SECTION 7910 OF
THE GOVERNMENT CODE
The public hearing was opened at 7:36 p.m.
There being no comments or objections, the public hearing was
closed and it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to
adopt Resolution No. 82-70 which sets the City of Tustin's
1982-83 appropriation limit at $11,695,561. Carried 3-0,
Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 29
4e
ZONE MANGE 82--4, O~DINANCE NO. 877 - An Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 17311 and 17341 MCFADDEN STREET FROM
MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) DISTRICT TO COMMERCIAL
GENERAL-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CG-PUD) DISTRICT
The Community Development Director presented the staff report
and reco~nendation.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 9-7-82
B 0-~ i'NF.S S
1.
The public hearing was opened at 7:37 p.m. There being no com-
ments or objections, =he public hearing was closed and it was
moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 877
have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and
Saltarelli absent.
Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 877 by the
City Clerk, it was moved b~ Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, that
Ordinance No. 877 be introduced. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and
Saltarelli absent. 110
VI.
ADJOUP/~NT
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere¥, that staff be
given the option to judge when Public Hearings are noncontro-
versial and then can be scheduled for the 3:00 p.m. meeting.
Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 83
It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Greinke, to adjourn a= 7:40
p.m. to a Workshop on September 13, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. in the Coun-
cil Chambers for consideration of the Planning Commission and thence
to the next regular meeting on Septeu~ber 20, 1982. Carried.