The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1 MINUTES 09-20-82~~A~~ OF ~ T~STIN ~ CO~C~L COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way S~ ?, 19~2 I. CAL~ TO O~R The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 4:05 ~q~T.?. Councilpersons Present= Councilpersons Absent: Others Present= Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey Kennedy, Saltarelli Jam~s G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Mike Broth-Arkie, Comm, Dev. Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nau~t, Finance Director Royleen White, Cn~munity Services Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Norman Hower, Traffic Engineer R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Approximately 10 in the audience III. PQ~LZC Walter Flaher~y stated he feels progress is slow pertaining to the .El C~m~no Real/Main Street Improvements project and complained that M. H. Communication Company has further slowed progress on the proj- ect. The Director of Public Works responded that M. H. Communica- tion is the field contractor for the cable television franchise and was urged by the City to complete installation on E1 C~m±no Real/ Main Street prior to the final street paving. The Director indi- cated that the project is very complex, and the contractor is only about 3 days behind schedule. Mayor E~gar noted that the contract contains a penalty/bonus clause as incentive for the contractor to complete the project on schedule. The Director responded to Mr. Flaherty~s other concerns. CO~6E~T It was moved by Greinke, entire Consent Calendar. absent. seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli 1. APT~O~L OF MINUTES -' September 1, 1982; August 31, 1982; August 30, 1982; and August 16, 1982. 2. ~ ~ ~%~S in the amount of $1,011,798.48. RATIFICATI~ ~ ~ in the amount of $191,659.76. 5O ~SOL~TIO~ ~O. 82-71 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG URBAN OPEN-SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM Adoption' of Resolution No. 82-71 as reconuuended by the Director of Community Services. 77 4e RES(~F~IO~ NO. 82-76 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN ~r.L;Y BETWEEN EL CAM~NO REAL AND "C" STREET AND NORTHERLY OF SECOND STREET A~D TO FIX A TIME AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING THEREON Adoption of Resolution No. 82-76 as recontmended by City Engineer. 105 5e RESO~TION NO. 82-73 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING FINAL TRACT NO. 11336 LOCATED AT 1651 MITCHELL AVENUE Adoption of Resolution No. 82-73 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 99 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 9-7-82 6. ~S~IF~IO~ NO. 82-74 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF ~PROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING R~CORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (FY-1981-82 Handicapped 9amp Construction Program - Nobest, Inc.) Adoption of Resolution No. 82-74 and if no cla~m~ or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of recordation of the Ncfcice of Completion, authorize payment of the final 10% retention amount as recommended by the Engineering Depart- ment. 92 7. RE~OTI~ NO. 82-75 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, OPPOSING PROPOSkTION 13, THE INITIA- TIVE MEASURE ENTITLED "WATER RESOURCES, STATUTORY INITIATIVE." Adoption of Resolution No. 82-75 as recommended by the City Engineer. 107 V · 1. VI. OLD B~SIN~SS ~ FOR ~T~ICT~D PA~EI~G ~ 15520 ~TIN ~ ~X Authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-street parking during street sweeping hours on Tustin Village Way adjacent to 15520 T~stin Village Way and that warnings be issued in lieu of citations for the first 30 days after the sign installation as reco~ended by the City Engineer. 75 FOR O~DINANCE NO. 875 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of T~stin, california, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE R~LATIVE TO THE REGULATION OF SECU~/TY BUSINESSES The City Manager responded to Councilman Hoesterey that false alarm fees would be an administrative matter; i.e., the ordi- nance would permit the Police Chief to determine the ~olicy on same. Councilman Greinke felt the ordinance is discriminatory by differentiating between residents and businesses; and there is no provision for alarms triggered by telphone signals. Following further discussion, it was moved by Hoestere¥, secon- ded by Edgar, t_hat Ordinance No. 875 have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. Following reading of the title by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 875 be introduced. Mayor Edgar suggested that Councilm~n Greinke list his concerns so that the Police Chief can respond to same at the next meet- lng2 Kathy Weil, 1702 S~-.,-~rville, commented that the ordinance is perhaps addressing businesses with automatic alarm systems that are hardwired directly into the Police Department, and there are probably very few residents (if any) with such sophisticated alarm systems. She agreed it would be helpful to have the Police Chief present to address concerns. Motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 82 ~a~N ~ - BKx~N A~EN~E ~"~K. ~ =ruu~ & O~DINANCE NO. 873 The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in his m-mo dated August 25, ~982. Council/staff discussion followed on methods for decreasing the speed limit on Main Street. Agnes Bacon was recognized by Council and suggested installation of a narrow divider on Main Street to prevent passing by speeding traffic. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 9-7-82 It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to continue the matter to the September 20 meeting for input from the Police Chief and alternatives of restriping the street or altering the physical nature of the street. VII. OTws~ 1. Councilman Greinke requested that staff prepare a report which can be forwarded by Council to the League of California Cities requesting changes in the law that has made it difficult to set the speed limit on Main Street to 30 mph. Following further discussion, the motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 100 ~ST A~uaL CITX ~-Z)~EE~' PICNIC Counci]-~n Greinke offered kudos and appreciation to Ad~ainistra- rive Secretary Donna Treat and all staff m~mhers who helped in making the August 29, 1982, City mmployees* Picnic a s~ccess. In response to Counci!-~n Hoesterey's concern, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to authorize the Mayor to send a letter (supplm-ented by a Mailgram) to Governor Brown urging him to veto the bill which would take away the power of local cities to control the sale of fireworks. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. Councilman Greinke suggested that a letter be sent to all Orange County city councils requesting their support of Tustin's posi- tion on the matter. Councilman Hoesterey suggested that if there are statistics on reduction of accidents or hospital calls due to fireworks that further correspondence be sent. Mayor Edgar reported that a report from Police Chief Thayer indicated that there is merit to the recast by Christian Tempo- rary Housing Facility for revenue sharing funds. The City Man- ager stated the matter will be agendized for the Septem~ber 20 meeting. 4. SOOTH/C~ff~,AL l~m~vm~OP~IT AR~a In response to Mayor Edgar, the City Manager reported that . information received from the consultant on this item will be provided at the Septe~ber 20 meeting. VIII. ~CESS - EVENING At 4:51 p.m. it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoestere¥, to recess to the 7:30 p.m. session. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Salta- relli absent. CIT~ O.~m~C*n'. ~ETING 7:30 ~ ~'XTING The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:32 p.m. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey Kennedy, Saltarelli James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E.' Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Co~u~. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Ron Nault, Finance Director CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 9-7-82 No~e, TX~E C~m%NGE 82-2, ORDxl~a~C~ NO. 878 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPB/)VING THE RE-ZOMING OF CER- TAiN PROPERTIES FRO~ C-1 TO CG DISTRICT AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF NEWPORT AVENUE AND MITCF~.T~ AVENUE (Taco Bell) The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recom~_ ndation. The public hearing was opened at 7:33 p.m. There being no com- ments or objections, t. he public hearing was closed and it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 878 have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 2® Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 878 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 878 be in~-roduced, carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 110 ~ ~ 82-3, 0~D~ANCE NO. 876 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE ~E-ZO~ING OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET BETWEEN "B" AND "C" STREETS SOUTHERLY FROM MAIN ON "B" FOR 36 FEET AND SOUTHERLY FROM MAIN ON "C" FOR 304 FEET, FROM THE MULTIPLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) DISTRICT TO THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PR) DISTRICT (Stevens Square) The C.~,,,unity Development Director presented the staff repor~ and recommendation. The public hearing was opened at 7:34 p.m. There being no com- ments or objections, the public hearing was closed and it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 876 have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 876 by t-he City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 876 be introduced. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 110 P~OPOSITI(H~ 4 - APP~OP~TA~ION T.~I(~ FISCAL ~ 1982-83, RES(~TI~ NO. 82-70 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, DETERMINING AND ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982-83, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND SECTION 7910 OF THE GOVERNMenT CODE 4e The public hearing was opened at 7:36 p.m. There being no comments or objections, the public hearing was closed and it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt Resolution No. 82-70 which sets the City of Tustin's 1982-83 appropriation limit at $11,695,561. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 29 ZOnE (~%NG~ 82-4, OP~INANCE NO. 877 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZOMING OF THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 17311 and 17341 MCFADDEN STPEET FROM MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) DISTRICT TO CO~IERCIAL GENERAL-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CG-PUD) DISTRICT The C~onity Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 9-7-82 The public hea~ing was opened at 7:37 p.m. There being no com- ments or objections, the public hearing was closed and it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 877 have first reading by title only. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 877 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoestere¥, that Ordinance No. 877 be introduced. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 110 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that staff be given the option to judge when Public Hearings are noncontro- versial and then can be scheduled for the 3:00 p.m. meeting. Carried 3-0, Kennedy and Saltarelli absent. 83 ADJOU~NT It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Greinke, to adjourn at 7:40 p.m. to a Workshop on Sept~-_her 13, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. in the Coun- cil Chambers for consideration of the Planning Commission and thence to the nex~ regular meeting on Septem~r 20, 1982. Carried. MAYOR