HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 1 ANNEXATION 130 10-04-82CITY COUNCIL No. VI -1 9-1-82 DATE: August 26, 1982 �W►lp Inter -Coln ADOPTED RESOLUTION $� 2- ` 7.2 -- TO: .z_. TO: Honorable Mayor & City Councillc-- Members Q FROM: R. Kenneth Fleagle 1, '< �' SUBJECT: Irvine -Elizabeth Way Annexation No. 130 RECOMMENDED ACTION Adoption of Resolution No. 82-72, scheduling a protest hearing for 3:00 p.m., October 4, 1982 for the proposed Irvine -Elizabeth Way Annexation No. 130. BACKGROUND The City Council, at the request of the Aldersgate United Methodist Church, submitted an annexation proposal to the Local Agency Formation Commission for the 7.84 acre area easterly of Elizabeth Way. The Local Agency Formation Commission conducted a public hearing on August 25, 1982 for the proposed annexation. Three property owners on the easterly side of Elizabeth Way requested, by letter, that their properties be excluded from the annexation proposal. LAFCO denied this request and unanimously approved the annexation proposal. No one spoke in opposition to the annexation at the LAFCO hearing. RKF:jh 8-26-82 DATE: THRU: TO: FROH: SUB.JECT: Sept, 29, 1982 BILL HUSTC~, CITY MANAG PUBLIC HEARING No. 1 10-4-82 nter- Corn HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL R.K. FLEAGLE fl~7 ANNEXATION NO. 150 (IRVINE-ELIZABETH ~VAY) RECON~NDED ACTION: Conduct protest hearing and accept written protests from property owners within the subject annexation area. Make a finding as to the value of written protests received prior to the close of the public hearing. Adopt Resolution No. 82- ~1 approving the Irvine-~lizabeth Way Annexation No. 150. BACKGROUND: Th, e proposed annexation was initiated by City Council Resolution No. 82-59 on July 19, 1982 at the request of the Aldersgate United Methodist Church. The Local Agency Formation Con~nission conducted a public hearing on .August 2S, 1982 and unanimously approved the annexation proposal. No protests were filed at the LAFCO hearing. Three property owners on Elizabeth Way requested LAFCO to delete their properties from the annexation. LAFCO denied their request and determined that the annexation was a logical extension of the City of Tustin boundaries. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 82-72 on September I, 1982 scheduling a protest hearing at 3:00 p.m. on October 4, 1982. Notice was given to all property owners within the annexation area, as well as to adjoining property owners who desire to be annexed to the City of Tustin. No written protests have been re- ceived as of the preparation of this report. The total value of the area proposed for annexation is $1,209,618. If protests are received from property owners who own property valued at less than 50% ($604,809) of the total, the Council is required to approve the annexation proposal. (The Aldersgate ~thodist Church and County Fire Station represent more than 50% of the total value within the annexation territory.) RKF: dmt 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 82-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, DETERMINING THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY KNOWN AS "IRVINE- ELIZABETH WAY ANNEXATION NO. 130" TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. Pursuant to Chapter 2, Part 2, Division 2 of Tit)e 4 of the Government Code, preliminary proceedings were completed by the Local Agency Formation Commission on August 25, 1982 and the City of Tustin was designated as the conducting authority and authorized to ~roceed with the annexation of the territory designated as Irvine-Elizabeth Way Annexation No. 130". The City Council, pursuant to Section 35201 of the Government Code, adopted Resolution No. 82-72, initiating annexation proceedings and fixing a time and place for a protest hearing. Due notice was given and a protest hearing was conducted after 3:00 p.m. October 4, 1982 and protest from property owners representing % of the ~otal assessed value of the area proposed for annexation' was received prior to the close of the hearing. Pursuant to Section 35337 of the Government Code, the City Council finds that the value of written protests is % of the total assessed value of land and improvements with~he area and. represents less than 50 percent of the total assessed value of land and improvements within the territory. The City Council hereby orders the annexation to the City of Tustin of the uninhabited territory designated "Irvine-Elizabeth Way Annexation No. 130" as specifically described in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Satisfaction of the requirements of Section 99(d) of the Revenue and Taxation Code has been accomplished by City Council Resolution No. 80-119 and Board of Supervisor's Resolution No. 80-1903 accepting a Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement applicable to subject fully developed area. Subject annexation shall be effective upon the filing and recording of the certificate of completion by the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission. The City Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, along with the required fees payable to the State Board of Equalization, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission for certification of completion and recording. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of October, 1982. ATTEST: RICHARD B. EDGAR, Mayor MARY WYNN, City Clerk POINT RO.B. )E. $30.51 322-00' IRVINE-ELIZABETH WAY ANNEXATION NO. 130 TO THE CITY OF TUST1N, CALIFORNIA PASSED AND ADOPTED BY RES. NO DATED PREPARED BY CITY OF TUS'lqN ENGINEERING DIVISION 300 CENTENNIAl WAY TUSTIN, CALl F., 92680 (?14) 544-~890 LEGEND AREA EXISTING ~ OF TUST~N BOUNOARY 7. 84AC. ,,,--.,.,,,,'--ANNEXATION TO THE CiTY OF TUSTIN 0.01SQ. MI. E~IBIT "A" 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 20 21 22 23 24 2~ 2~ 27 28 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE IRVINE-ELIZABETH WAY ANNEXATION NO. 130 TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA That portion of Lot 331, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 12 of Irvine's subdivision in unincorporated territory of the County of Orange, State of California as per map recorded in Book 1, Page 88 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, described as follows: PARCEL 1 Beginning at a point on the existing centerline of Irvine Boulevard, referred to as Point "A" for the purpose of this description, said point being an angle point in the existing City of Tustin boundary as established by.the Red Hill Center Annexation and also being distant along said centerline S.49°57'40"E., 1320.93 feet from the most westerly corner of said Block Thence, along the existing City of Tustin boundary per above-mentioned Red Hill Center Annexation, and the Irvine-Elizabeth Annexation No. 76 through the following courses; N.49°57'40"W., 330.51 feet; Thence, N.39°56'51"E., 301.94 feet; Thence, N.49°57'40"W., 165.00 feet; Thence, N.39°56'51"E., 66.00 feet to an angle point in said City of Tustin boundary; Thence, leaving said City of Tustin boundary, continuing N.39o56'51"E., along the southeasterly line of the northwesterly 1/2 of the northwesterly 1/2 of the southerly 1/4 of said Lot 331, as shown on a parcel map filed in Book 9, Page 16 of Parcel Maps, records of said Orange County, a distance of 293.00 feet to the point of intersection with the existing centerline of Wass Street; Thence, leaving said southeasterly line, S.49°57'40"E., along said centerline of Wass Street, a distance of 495.51 feet to the point of intersection with the northwesterly boundary of Tract No. 3358 as per map recorded in Book 123, Pages 30, 31 and 32 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County; Thence, leaving said centerline of Wass Street, S.39°56'51"W., along said northwesterly Tract boundary, a distance of 660.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL 2 Beginning at Point "A" as described in Parcel i above; Thence, S.49°57'40"E., along said centerline of Irvine Boulevard, a distance of 200.00 feet to an angle point in the existing City of Tustin boundary as established by the Red Hill-Irvine Annexation No. 70; Thence, leaving saiO centerline of Irvine Boulevard, along the existing City of Tustin boundary as established by above-mentioned Red Hill-Irvine Annexation No. 70, the Bryan-Red Hill Annexation and the Red Hill Center Annexation through the following courses; 1 I S.39057,41,W., 322.00 feet; Thence, N.49°57'40"W., 200.00 feet; Thence 2 N.39057,41,E., 322.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 121 18 2O 21 22 23 24 2~ 27 28