HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 4 FINANCIAL REVIEW 11-02-82DATE:
October 28, 1982
REPORTS
No. 4
11-1-82
Inter - C om
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Bill Huston, .~?~?ager_~
· or
Ron Nault, Fi~or
First Quarter 1982-83 Financial Review
Attached are schedules of revenues and expenditures for the period July through
September 1982. It is difficult to draw any conclusions concerning trends based
on the limited information available '~c this time, but I will address areas of
major concern.
REVENUE
73% of total revenues of the General Fund are collected from proper~ taxes, sales
taxes, and motor vehicle in-lieu fees. Property tax distributions do not begin
until mid-December. 'The only revenue that may come in prior to this time might be
delinquent collections from prior years such as the $8,800 in the General Fund and
the $160,000 in the Redevelopment Agency. The County has sent us an estimated
collection report that comes within t% of the 1982-83 budget. I feel confident
that property tax revenue for 1982-83 will be as estimated.
The State has assum~ the majority of motor vehicle funds as a means of balancing
its 1982-83 budget. They have determined that it is in their best interest to
withhold any distribution of this subvention until each agency has repaid the
equivalent of its 1978-79 bailout. It will take approximately six months for
Tustin to "repay" its $369,000 Proposition 13 bailout. We will not begin to re-
ceive motor vehicle in-lieu revenue until January or February.
I do have some concern at this time with sales tax revenues. Based on conver-
sations with people at the State Board of Equalization there appears to have been
a real drop in retail sales for the months of /4ay, June, and July. The $282,170
variance respresents approximately 6~ of the total sales tax revenue budgeted. !
have reviewed the projections for the next quarter and feel that if our
collections for August, September, and October are equal to last years', plus the
anticipated increase due t~ the excellerated collections scheduled to begin
November, we will be 'back on track' for the balance of the fiscal year. A
similar situation occurred in the third quarter of 1981-82 and by the end of the
fourth quarter retail sales had rebounded beyond the previous quarters' dip. At
this point I would suggest we sit tight until mid-December when the previous
quarters' collections are distributed. I am optimistic that we will recover and
the apparent shortfall will only be temporary.
The other funds appear to be within reason. The increased collections in gas tax
are a direct result of increased gas tax rates. The Redevelopment Agency received
$163,000 of delinquent collections from prior years, and there is a slight in-
crease in water sales revenue, 15~. Approximately 9% of the water increase is due
to the rate increase with the balance spr~'ad between increased consumption and
miscellaneous water revenue.
Bill Huston
October 28, 1982
Financial Review
page 2.
A comparison of revenue for all funds shows a negative variance of less than 2%.
I would consider this reasonable for this period of time.
EXPE#DITURES
Fully 60% of the total operating budgets are appropriated for personnel expenses.
A review of first quarter personnel expenses indicates that expenditures are
within anticipated limits for this period. Current expenditures project out to
appropriated budgets. Variables may arise from personnel turn-over, the major
impact coming from the Public Works and Police Departments, that could contribute
to some savings in this area.
I have no concerns with year-to-date expenses for supplies and services or capital
outlay.
CAPITAL It~ROVEME#TS
The schedule of capital improvements simply reflects the appropriated projects and
expenditures to date. Significant activities during the first quarter were the
completion of the E1 Camino Real parking structure at Stevens Square and the
beginning of the E1 Camino Real street reconstruction.
1982-83
FIRST qUARTER FI~CIN. REPORT
COMPARING REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Comparative Revenues as of September 30, 1982
Revenue Source
Y-T-D Y-T-D
Budget 1982-83 1981-82
General Fund:
Property taxes
Franchise taxes
Sales tax
Transient lodging tax
Business lic.tax
New construction tax
Construction permits
Other licenses & permits
Vehicle Code fines
Non-traffic fines
Interest
Rents
Motor vehicle in-lieu fees
Homeowners prop. tax relief
Business Inv. tax relief
Cigarette tax
Other State revenue
Community Services fees
Other current changes
Other City revenue
GENERAL FUND TOTAL
$1,576,619 $ 8,862 $ 345
320,000 -0- -0-
4,303,404 600,026 882,196
50,000 -0- -0-
155,000 9,889 5,656
200,000 9,491 32,214
150,000 43,085 87,488
10,500 2,809 2,355
241,000 20,252 33,463
25,000 4,660 10,874
375,000 491 489
33,872 8,567 9,283
395,519 39,299 162,502
67,200 -0- -0-
100,000 -0- -0-
150,00~ 41,779 41,070
73,518 5,625 2,123
304,270 74,105 63,874
40,600 6,032 5,906
16,465 <2,312> 27,369
$8,587,967 $872,660 $1,367,207
Revenue Sharing Fund
$ 279,000 $ -0- $ -0-
Gas Tax Fund:
Interest $ 10,000 -0- -O-
City 459,876 114,400 72,945
Federal 1,164,000 -O-
GAS TAX FUND TOTAL $1,633,876 $114,4D0 $ 72,945
Park Development Fund $ -0- $ -0- $ 4,100
Sewer Fund $ 3,000 $ 238 $ 506
Beautification Fund
$ 30,000 $ 3,848 $ 6,673
Park Bond Fund $ 81,500 $ 237 $ -0-
Civic Center Bond Fund $ 55,500 $ 165 $ -0-
Tustin Community RDA $ 1,250,000 $ 163,260 $ 53,371
Water Utility Fund
$ 3,676,640 $ 649,657 $ 563,349
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
$15,597,483 $1,804,465 $2,068,151
Variance
$ 8,517
<282,170>
4,233
<22,723>
<44,403>
454
<13,211>
<6,214>
2
<716>
<123,203>
709
3,502
10,231
126
<29,681>
<$494,547>
41,455
$ 41,455
$ <4,100>
$ <268>
$ <2,825>
$ 237
$ 165
$109,889
$ 86,383
<$263,686>
Comparative Expenditures as of September 30, 1982
Department
Budget
Y-T-D
1982
General Fund
Legislation
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
165,456
91,815
445
$ 34,634
11,336
-0-
TOTAL
$ 257,716
$ 45,970
Administration
PERS
S&S
Capital Outlay
$ 346,121
119,969
5,790
$ 73,701
42,344
-0-
TOTAL
$471,880
$116,045
Community Development
PERS
S&S
Capital Outlay
319,802
70,086
377
$ 67,283
4,983
TOTAL
$ 390,265
$ 72,266
Public Works
PERS
S&S
Capital Outlay
$1,169,807
1,095,313
4,228
$240,894
141,049
TOTAL
$2,269,348
$381,943
Pol ice
PERS
S&S
Capital Outlay
$2,881,823
440,012
12,546
$600,987
21,064
589
TOTAL
$3,334,381
$622,640
Fi re
$1,325,000
-0-
Community Services
PERS
S&S
Capital Outlay
211,811
246,480
6,915
$ 38,815
37,184
228
TOTAL
465,206
76,227
Department
Non-Departmental
GENEP~AL FUND TOTAL
Tustin RDA
PERS
S&S
Capital Outlay
RDA TOTAL
Water Utility Fund
PERS
S&S
Capital Outlay
WATER UTILITY TOTAL
TOT~J. ALL FUNDS
Budget
$ 185,600
$8,687,796
$ 3,600
166,000
$ 169,600
$ 518,753
2,781,460
27,310
$3,327,523
$12,195,919
Y-T-D
1982
$ 16,240
$1,328,331
$ 4,443
65,544
$ 69,987
$ 89,395
361,693
$451,088
$1,849,406
FIRST QUARTER ~ATUS RI~PORT
CAPITAL II41~I~OVi~ltENTS
Public Facilities
Community Center rehab.
Paint City Hall
Misc. building modifications
City/Police
82-83 82-83
Fund Budget Y-T-D
B $ 14,200
B 19,000
GF 3,150' 3,569
$ 36,350 $ 3,569
Beautification Projects
General street lights
E1Camino Real I.D. signs
E1Camino Real landscape
Irvine Blvd. center island
landscape/irrigation
"C" Street Plaza
B $ 9,000
RDA 10,000
RDA 40,000
RDA 55,600
RDA 50,000*
$ 164,600
Community Services Facilities
Misc. park improvements
Master Plan of Parks & Rec.
facilities
Columbus Tustin Park imp.
Pepper Tree Park imp
Centennial Park imp.
Frontier Park imp.
Magnolia Park imp.
Pine Tree Park imp.
Columbus Tustin Park & Rec.
facility, A & £
GF $ 4,000
PD 41,718'
PD 32,000*
PD 12,900'
PD 19,000'
PD 11,500'
PD 12,500'
PD 5,000*
RDA 118,000
$ 256,618
Transportation Facilities
Major maintenance program
Moult on Parkway realignment
E1Camino Real parking
facility
Alley reconstruction east
of E1Camino Real
Alley reconstruction south
of First Street
Ramps for handicapped
*Reappropriation from prior year
RS $ 255,000
GT 37,000
FAU 237,300
GT 294,000
RDA
RDA
RDA
GT
684,000
1,200
6,040
45,000
$ 45,000
$
7,002
$ 7,002
$
36,250
700,099
1,197
6,039
7,753
82-83 82-83
Fund Budget Y-T-D
Transportation Facilities (cont'd)
Alley reconstruction west of
E1Camino Real RDA
Newport Avenue extension GT
Warner Avenue railroad cross-
ing protective devices GT
Irvine Blvd. widening east of
Ranchwood GT
Irvine Blvd./Prospect to
Newport
Bus benches OCTD routes
E1 Camino Real reconstruction
Prospect Ave. road widening
GT
FAU
RS
RDA
RDA
Traffic Controls
Signal interconnect - Irvine
Blvd. Yorba to Red Hill
Irvine Blvd. at "B" St.
Red Hill & Barranca Rd.
Walnut Ave. at Oxford Ave.
Red Hill Ave. at Walnut Ave.
Newport Ave. at Sycamore Ave.
E1 Camino Real & Sixth St.
Flood Control Facilities
Easement drain north of
Main St./dtwn/Pasadena and
Costa Mesa Freeway
Catch basin - Santa Fe and
Industrial Way
Red Hill Drain No.2
Walnut Ave. to Mitchell Ave.
RDA
GT
FAU
GT
GT
GT
GF
GF
RDA
RS
RS
GF
GF
Water Supply & Distribution
Vagano Way 800 (plus/minus)
north of Skyline Dr. and
west of Red Hill
Fairhaven water main
WF
WF
*Reappropriated from prior year
$ 1,005
30,000
8,100
150,000
29,900
325,100
4,500
1,230,219
14,000
$3,307,364
$ 33,600
21,600
395,900
57,000
31,000
52,000
29,000
52,000
53,100
$ 725,200
21,000
13,000
6,000
237,000
277,000
$ 20,000
115,000'
$ 1,001
2,035
180,201
$934,575
$ 317
3,054
12,671
82 -83 82 -83
Budget Y-T-D
Fund
Water Supply & Distribution (cont'd)
Mitchell Ave. water main con-
nection WF
Red Hill Ave./Walnut well site WF
Palomar Way & Olympian Way be-
tween Fairhaven dr. and
Ranier Drive WF
Nisson Rd. east of Red Hill Ave. WF
E1 Camino & Newport main re-
placement WF
Red Hill main replacement,
Lance to Irvine WF
Miscellaneous Services
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
*Reappropriated from prior years
$ 2,500*
12,800'
80,700
38,800
$ 269,300
$5,036,432
15,700
5,061
769
5,360
$ 26,890
$1,033,078