Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 12-06-82MI~F~TES ~ A ~m~ ~r~G OF TH~ T~STI~ ~ CO~CIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way Norther 15, 1982 I. CA~L TO O~ The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 3:56 p.m. III · CO, CEOS Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Royleen White, Community Services Director Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 20 in the audience pU~I'.TC Kathy well, 1702 Summerville, Civic Liaison for the Tustin Meadows Community Association, read the following resolution into the Coun- cil minutes which was passed by the Association Board: BULLET TRAIN RESOLUTION RESOLVED that the Tustin Meadows Community Association strongly urges the Tustin City Council to actively oppose the construction and operation of the "Bullet Train" System. The Association's opposition to the "Bullet Train" is based on the following: Assembly Bill 3647, which makes possible this System, was approved by the State Legislature without proper public input and safeguards. The construction of the System would create excessive noise and visual impact that would far outweigh any transportation bene- fits to the people. 3. The construction of the system would lower the value of the residential property in the City of Tustin. 4. The strong possibility that the System would become a burden to the taxpayers. The Association asks the Council to oppose the "Bullet Train" by taking the following action: 1. Make the City's opposition known to the four-man review commis- sion chaired by Jesse Unruh. 2. Urge the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to Oppose the Bullet Train on the basis that the System will create many problems and solve few. 3. Follow the lead of the San Clemente City Council by joining the Association for Bullet Train Review. 4. Join with the Tustin Meadows Community Association in communi- cating our concerns to our Legislators in Sacramento. It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Kennedy, to support the resolu- tion of the Tustin Meadows Community Association opposing the Bullet Train. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 11-15-82 Councilman Saltarelli asked that the motion include that the City request the Orange County Division, League of California Cities, to seek legislation that would remove the SEQA exe~ption on this proj- ect. The motion was amended by Greinke, seconded by Kennedy, to support the Tustin Meadows Con~nunity Association resolution opposing the Bullet Train, and to encourage the participation of the League of California Cities to seek legislation that would remove the environmental review exemption. Carried 5-0. 101 C~T.~IDA~ "NO" votes were registered by Hoesterey and Kennedy On Item 9. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAL 0~ MINUTES - November 1, 1982 2. RATIFICB~IO~ ~ pA-vl%0~ in the amount of $98,629.93. APPItOVA~ ~ D~A~DS in the amount of $90,851.11. 5O 4e 5e 7e P. l~N~Ol~ PIt0~CTION AGgK~m~ Approve 1983 agreement with L. P. Repertory as presented and recon~nended by the Director of Community Services. 45 D~Tr_Az, (~' ~"nm. ZH0~ E, P&QI,.It~ ~ C~.~.~O; D&TS 0~' ~.,O~S: 8/16/82; ~'~'rq~o. 82-25; Fr~.~,n ~ ,-,Ty= 9/24/82 Deny subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 RDA ~ REPOI~ FOR FISCA~ ~ 1981-82 Motion that the City Council has reviewed the Annual Report of the Redevelopment Agency for FY 1981-82 and approves the findings, program and recommendations of the report, includ- ing the independent financial audit report as recommended by Ken Fleagle, the D.P.A. Consultant. 81 REQUEST FOR TI~E ~ IN PARE~ AT 15~21 PACIFIC ~ Removal of tree as requested, and replacemant with a tree chosen frem the City approved tree list by Mrs. Francis as recommended by the Maintenance Superintendent. 8G.1 REQOE~T FOR TREE ~OVAL AT 14751BIltuuWOOD Removal of subject tree as requested, with no replacement tree planted as recommended by the Maintenance Superin- tendent. 86.1 9e TI~%NSPORTATION u~v~uOP~T ACT PROGRAM - APPItOVA~ ~ PROJECT AND CLAIM FOR "PROGP~M" Approve construction of the handicapped ramps as outlined in the City Engineer's staff report dated November 8, 1982, with the City Engineer as designated contact person and also authorize the submittal of the application for all f~nds available to the City of Tustin for fiscal year 1982-83 as recommended by the City Engineer. 95 I~SO~UTION NO. 82-88 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin UPHOLDING PLANNING AGENCY APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT 82-22 WITH CONDITIONS Adopt Resolution No. 82-88 as recommended by the Co~unity Development Department. (Hoesterey and Kennedy registered "NO" votes.) 81 V. ORDINANCES ~R ]lvr~OOUCTIO~ - None VI. OROI- DANCES FOR ADOPTIO~ 1. ORDINANCE NO. 882 - An INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 881 AND DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS DESIGNED FOR OFFICE USE IN THE C-1, C-2, CG, M AND PC-COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY DAYS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 11-15-82 Following consideration of the report dated November 10, 1982, prepared by the City Attorney, it was moved by Hoesterey, sec- onded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 882 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading of the title of Ordinance No. 882 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Salta- relli, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 882 be intro- duced. Motion carried 5-0. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, that Ordi- nance No. 882 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading of the title of Ordinance No. 882 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt Ordinance No. 882. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None None 81 VII. OXY) B~IN~S~ - None Bids for a 1983 Chevrolet or GMC Suburban Wagon with diesel engine and 3-speed automatic transmission, including sales tax, were received as follows: Skelley Latzer & Co./Deanza Chevrolet Guaranty Chevrolet Motors, Inc. University Sales & Service (GMC) $13,134.57 $13,834.17 $14,097.72 The Director of Public Works responded to Council concerns on the need for a diesel engine as opposed to a gasoline engine, stating that the diesel engine can withstand idling much better than the gasoline engine with less maintenance problems. He added that the City qualified for a fleet price, lowering the amount by an additional $800.00. It was then moved by Hoes- terey, seconded by Kennedy, to award the bid in the amount of $13,134.57 to Skelley Latzer & Company/Deanza Chevrolet for the purchase of a 1983 Chevrolet Suburban Wagon as recommended by the City Engineer in his report dated November 9, 1982. Motion carried 5-0. 87 RESOLUTION HO. 82-83 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF $8,500,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF TOWN CENTER AREA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TAX ALLOCATION BONDS, SERIES 1982 BY THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMh~NT AGENCY This item was deferred to the 7:30 p.m. meeting. WIHDSOR GARDKNS COHDGPLIh-u~ CC~IVERSZOH The Community Development Director briefly recapped his written report dated Nov-mber 15, 1982. The report was received and filed by unanimous infoz'aual consent. 43 X. I~'£mKw~ ~ PLANNING CO*l- MINION ~CANT This item was deferred to the 7:30 p.m. meeting. XI. ~ ~u~NESS -None (See page 4.) At 4:10 p.m. the City Council recessed to a meeting of the Redevel- opment Agency, and thence to the 7:30 p.m. session by unanimous informal consent. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 11-15-82 MI~TES OF A ~AR ~rXNG OF ~E ~ CI'£~ CO~NC~- Nov--h,~ 15, 1982 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 8:06 p.m. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None James G. ~murke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Ron Nault, Finance Director Approximately 22 in the audience III. PUnT.TC C~Kl~i8 - None VIII. B~SINESS 2. ~SC~TTIC~i NO. 82-83 - A Resolution of the City Council of ~he City of Tustin APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF $8,500,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF TOWN CENTER AREA REDEV~J~OPMENT PROJECT TAX aT~T.OCATION BONDS, SERIES 1982, BY THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENcy It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adop~ Resolu- tion No. 82-83. Carried 5-0. Mayor Edgar suggested addressing some of the proposed projects such as a water well and electrical undergrounding. The City Manager suggested that staff prepare a report for the next meeting outlining steps that need to be taken, projects by category, and options that are available. 81 X. I~vr~v-m OF P~m~I~i~ COI~LISSIC~i A~mhICANT G E~.~CTI~ OF ~flN~LISSIC~S Charles Puckett was interviewed by the Council as he was out of town at the time other applicants were interviewed. Paper ballots were used to vote for 5 Planning Commissioners by the City Council. Voting results were as follows: APPLICANT VOTES Kathy Well Ronald H. White Mark D. Ainslee Charles E. Puckett Jam~s B. Sharp L. W. (Bill) Robbins Walter S. Kowalik Hildegarde E. Cutts C. Robert Edman Steven E. Price Kathy Weil, Ronald H. White, Mark D. Ainslee, Charles E. Puckett, and James B. Sharp will be sworn in at the December 6, 1982, meeting Also at the same meeting, staff will prepare a report on the pro- posed training program for commissioners with a projected target date for comencing Planning Commission meetings. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 11-15-82 XI. ~ BUSINESS At ~he request of Councilwoman Kennedy and the City Manager, an Executive Session for legal matters was scheduled following the meeting. In response to Councilman Saltarelli's request, Council con- curred that the- City Manager send a copy to the Tustin News Editor of. his letter dated November 5, 1982, to the Chamber of Commerce President responding to an article which appeared in the November, 1982, issue of the Chamber's "Tustin Advocate," which inferred that cities will unilaterally raise property taxes to fund the cost of employee retirement. 97 Councilwoman K~nnedy asked staff to check into the circumstances of the accident this date at Redhill and the railroad crossing. 4. FINAL PA~N~ IN DO~EOW~ ~ Councilman Gretnke explained that the reason we have not com- pleted the final paving on parts of E1 Camino Real and Main Street is a safety factor. Staff wants to keep the traffic flowing as slowly as possible during construction. Mayor Edgar commended the City Awards Committee for a fine Awards banquet and asked that letters of commendation be sent to the Xll. Mayor Edgar reported that the City Attorney had given the opin- ion that it was probably invalid to fund any Christmas decora- tions for the downtown area from the Redevelopment Agency but it would be appropriate to fund it out of the general revenue. He also reported that Gene Carter of the Edison Company has sug- gested that Council should be very alert as to legal authority for expending energy for decorations. 81 Mayor Edgar suggested that the ribbon-cutting ceremony celebrat- ing completion of the downtown area improvements should be held in early January, perhaps January 15 at 10:00 a.m. The Well Wishers have volunteered to help and we should involve the Cham- ber of Commerce, the Historical Society, and any other groups that would like to help. A cum~ittee should be formed that would include those participants that would like to help. Coun- cil concurred. 95 ADJOu~NT It was ~oved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to adjourn to an Executive Session for legal matters, thence to a Workshop on November 16, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. for Water Rate and Financial Analy- sis, and thence to the next regular meeting on December 6, 1982. Carried 5-0. MAYOR CITY CLERK CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 11-15-82 XI. ~ BUSINESS 1. At ~he request of Councilwoman Kennedy and the City Manager, an Executive Session for legal matters was scheduled following ~he meeting. 2. ~PO~SE TO ~ A~IC~E - COP~ TO T~STIN NE~S ~ITOR In response to Councilman Saltarelli's request, Council con- cuffed that the- City Manager send a copy to the Tustin News Editor of his letter dated November 5, 1982, to the Chamber of Commerce President responding to an article which appeared in the November, 1982, issue of the Chamber's "Tustin Advocate," which inferred that cities will unilaterally raise property taxes to fund the cost of employee retirement. 97 Councilwoman Kennedy asked staff to check into the circumstances of the accident this date at Redhill and the railroad crossing. 4. FINA~ PAFXNG IN DO%~FI~WN ~ Councilman Greinke explained that the reason we have not com- pleted the final paving on parts of E1 Camino Real and Main Street is a safety factor. Staff wants to keep the traffic flowing as slowly as possible during construction. 5. CIT~ A~A~D$ DINmsK Mayor Edgar commended the City Awards Committee for a fine Awards banquet and asked that letters of commendation be sent to the Co~m4ttee. Mayor Edgar reported that the City Attorney had given the opin- ion that it was probably invalid to fund any Christmas decora- tions for the downtown area from the Redevelopment Agency but it would be appropriate to fund it out of the general revenue. He also reported that Gene Carter of the Edison Company has sug- gested that Council should be very alert as to legal authority for expending energy for decorations. 81 Mayor Edgar suggested that the ribbon-cutting ceremony celebrat- ing completion of the downtown area improvements should be held in early January, perhaps January 15 at 10~00 a.m. The Well Wishers have volunteered to help and we should involve the Cham- ber of Commerce, the Historical Society, and any other groups that would like to help. A committee should be formed that would include those participants that would like to help. Coun- cil concurred. 95 XII. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to adjourn to an Executive Session for legal matters, thence to a Workshop on Nov-mher 16, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. for Water Rate and Financial Analy- sis, and thence to the next regular meeting on December 6, 1982. Carried 5-0. MAYOR CITY CLERK CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 11-15-82 OF '-~l~ ~lTb-~'IN czr~'~ COi~iCrz- No~,-,-ker 15, 19~2 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 8:06 p.m. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Ron Nault, Finance Director Approximately 22 in the audience III. P~r-TC CONCE]~S - None ~DA O~DER VIII. NE~ B~SINESS 2. ~TTI(Xl NO. 82-83 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of T~stin APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF $8,500,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF TOWN CENTER AREA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TAX ~?J.OCATION BONDS, SERIES 1982, BY THE TUSTIN CO~4UNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENcy It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt Resolu- tion No. 82-83. Carried 5-0. Mayor Edgar suggested addressing some of the proposed projects such as a water well and electrical undergrounding. The City Manager suggested that staff prepare a report for the next meeting outlining steps that need to be taken, projects by category, and options that are available. 81 X. INTER~IE~ ~ ~ING C0~I~SIO~ APPlICaNT G Charles Puckett was interviewed by the Council as he was out of town at the time other applicants were interviewed. Paper ballots were used to vote for 5 Planning Commissioners by the City Council. Voting results were as follows: APPLICANT VOTES Kathy Well Ronald H. White Mark D. Ainslee Charles E. Puckett James B. Sharp L. W. (Bill) Robbins Walter S. Kowalik Hildegarde E. Cutts C. Robert Edman Steven E. Price Kathy Weil, Ronald H. White, Mark D. Ainslee, Charles E. Puckett, and James B. Sharp will be sworn in at the December 6, 1982, meeting Also at the same meeting, staff will prepare a report on the pro- posed training program for commissioners with a projected target date for comencing Planning Comission meetings. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 11-15-82 Following consideration of the report dated November 10, 1982, prepared by the City Attorney, it was moved by Hoesterey, sec- onded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 882 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading of the title of Ordinance No. 882 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Salta- relli, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 882 be intro- duced. Motion carried 5-0. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, that Ordi- nance No. 882 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading of the title of Ordinance No. 882 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt Ordinance No. 882. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None None 81 VII. O~D ~INES~ - None VIII. NE~ B~SINESS 1. Bids for a 1983 Chevrolet or GMC s~burban Wagon with diesel engine and 3-speed automatic transmission, including sales tax, were received as follows: Skelley Latzer a Co./Deanza Chevrolet Guaranty Chevrolet Motors, Inc. University Sales & Service (GMC) $13,134.57 $13,834.17 $14,097.72 The Director of Public Works responded to Council concerns on the need for a diesel engine as opposed to a gasoline engine, stating that the diesel engine can withstand idling much better than the gasoline engine with less maintenance problems. He added that the City qualified for a fleet price, lowering the amount by an additional $800.00. It was then moved by Hoes- terey, seconded by Kennedy, to award the bid in the amount of $13,134.57 to Skelley Latzer & Company/Deanza Chevrolet for the purchase of a 1983 Chevrolet suburban Wagon as recommended by the City Engineer in his report dated November 9, 1982. Motion carried 5-0. 87 I~ES(~TIO~ NO. 82-83 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF $8,500,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF TOWN CENTER AREA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TAX ALLOCATION BONDS, SERIES 1982 BY THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY This item was deferred to the 7:30 p.m. meeting. The Community Development Director briefly recapped his written report dated November 15, 1982. The report was received and filed by unanimous informal consent. 43 This item was deferred to the 7:30 p.m. meeting. XI. OT~R ~INESS -None (See page 4.) XII. ~CESS - ~D~¥~OP~T; EVENING - ~CO~v~,, At 4:10 p.m. the City Council recessed to a meeting of the Redevel- opment Agency, and thence to the 7:30 p.m. session by unanimous informal consent. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 11-15-82 V. CON-~'so~T C~r.~DAR Councilman Saltarelli asked that the motion include that the City request the Orange County Division, League of California Cities, to seek legislation that would remove the SEQA exemption on this proj- ect. The motion was amended by Greinke, seconded by Kennedy, to support the Tustin Meadows Community Association resolution opposing the Bullet Train, and to encourage the participation of the League of California Cities to seek legislation that would remove the environmental review exemption. Carried 5-0. 101 "NO" votes were registered by Hoesterey and Kennedy on Item 9. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. 1. APP~ON%%L (~ MI~=z-~3 - November 1, 1982 2. P~%TIFICATIO~ (~ ~ in the amount of $98,629.93. APP~OVA~ (~ DEMANDS in the amount of $90,851.11. 5O P. ~EPE~O~ P~OD~.-r~(H~ AG~£ Approve 1983 agreement with L. P. Repertory as presented and reco~m%ended by the Director of Comunity Services. 45 D~NIAL (~' CLAIM 0~ E. PAPal'NE D~ CARLO; naT~ OW ~0~= 8/16/82; CLAZ~NO. 82-25; r,,~n WI'TH (IIT~': 9/24/82 Deny subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 ~A ~uaL ~ POR FISCA~ ~A~1981-82 Motion that the City Council has reviewed the Annual Report of the Redevelopment Agency for FY 1981-82 and approves the findings, program and reco~endations of the report, includ- ing the independent financial audit report as recommended by Ken Fleagle, the D.P.A. Consultant. 81 6e I~QOEST FOR T~E~ l~JV~. IN PARE~H%~ AT 15621 PACIFIC =-rm~a' Removal of tree as requested, and replacement with a tree chosen from the City approved tree list by Mrs. Francis as recon~aended by the Maintenance Superintendent. 86.1 ~ FOR T~B~ ~40FA~ AT 14751 mT~i. WOOD PIECE Removal of subject tree as requested, with no replacement tree planted as recommended by the Maintenance Superin- tendent. 86.1 8e T~AN~O~TATI(H~ ~sV~OP~ ACT P~0G~A~- ~TmT~ FOR "PROGRAM" Approve construction of the handicapped ramps as outlined in the City Engineer's staff report dated November 8, 1982, with the City Engineer as designated contact person and also authorize the submittal of the application for all funds available to the City of Tustin for fiscal year 1982-83 as recommended by the City Engineer. 95 RESOLUTION NO. 82-88 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin UPHOLDING PLANNING AGENCY APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT 82-22 WITH CONDITIONS Adopt Resolution No. 82-88 as recommended by the Community Development Department. (Hoesterey and Kennedy registered "NO" votes.) 81 V. OI~INANCES FOR I~OOUCTIO~ - None VI. 01~D'r- I%%NC~ S FOR ADOPTI0~ 1. ORDINANCE NO. 882 - An INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 881 AND DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS DESIGNED FOR OFFICE USE IN THE C-1, C-2, CG, M AND PC-COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY DAYS MINUTES ~ A ~EG~A~ ~r~NG OF THE T~STIN ~ COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way Nov-mher 15, 1982 I. CALL TO O~DER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 3:56 p.m. II. C~T.T. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Greinke, Ho.stet,y, Kennedy, Saltarelli None Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brot-markle, Comm. Dev. Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Royleen White, Community Services Director Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 20 in the audience III. COnCErNS Kathy Weil, 1702 S~mmerville, Civic Liaison for the Tustin Meadows Co~nunity Association, read the following resolution into the Coun- cil minutes which was passed by the Association Board: BULLET TRAIN RESOLUTION RESOLVED that the Tustin Meadows Community Association strongly urges the Tustin City Council to actively oppose the construction and operation of the "Bullet Train" System. The Association's opposition to the "Bullet Train" is based on the following: Assembly Bill 3647, which makes possible this System, was approved by the State Legislature without proper public input and safeguards. The construction of the System would create excessive noise and visual impact that would far outweigh any transportation bene- fits to the people. 3. The construction of the system would lower the value of the residentiaI property in the City of Tustin. 4. The strong possibility that the System would become a burden to the taxpayers. The Association asks the Council to oppose the "Bullet Train" by taking the following action: Make the City's opposition known to the four-man review commis- sion chaired by Jesse Unruh. 2. Urge the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to oppose the Bullet Train on the basis that the System will create many problems and solve few. 3. Follow the lead of the San Clement. City Council by joining the Association for Bullet Train Review. 4. Join with the Tustin Meadows Community Association in communi- cating our concerns to our Legislators in Sacramento. It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Kennedy, to support the resolu- tion of the Tustin Meadows Community Association opposing the Bullet Train.