HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 12-19-83MINUTES OF A REGULAR
OF 1HE CI1Y COUNCIL OF llJE
CITY OF llJSTIN, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 19,. 1983
II.
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF N. LEGIANC£/INVOCATZON
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hoesterey at 7:03 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Councilman Edgar, and the Invocation was given by Mayor
Hoesterey.
ROLL CALL
Councilpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Frank H. Greinke
Donald J. Sal tarell i
None
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Donald D. Lamm,.Com. Development Director
Ronald A. Nault, Director of Finance
Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
Royleen A. White, Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Dir.
Jeff Kolin, Recreation Superintendent
Captain N. Williams, Police Department
Approximately 25 in the audience
III. PUBLIC INPUT - USE R!RMIT 83-28 (1011 LAGU#A ROAD)
Jack Miller, 17352 Parker Drive, spoke in opposition to Use Permit
83-28 (authorization to operate a convenience market i.ncluding the
off-sale of beer and wine, and to install three 6,000-gallon above-
grade petroleum storage tanks) which was approved by the Planning Com-
mission on December 12, 1983, and urged the Council's denial of same.
Mr. Miller cited objections as follows: the proximity of the project
to Tustin High School; the TUSD Board of Education has not had an
opportunity to act on the request; it poses too great a convenience for
obtaining alcoholic beverages - not only to students, but truck drivers
returning to the public streets and highways; and he quoted statistics
of drunk-driving related deaths in the Nation.
Margaret Greinke, 230 South "A" Street, applicant/owner, described the
proposed operations of the convenience market and assured the Council
that scrutiny would be practiced by office personnel in the sale of
alcoholic beverages.
Mr. Miller emphasized his major concern is that allowing a convenience
market selling alcoholic beverages contradicts the message of recent
series of meetings to educate students about "chemical people" - those
who abuse alcohol and drugs.
Council/staff discussion followed, with Mrs. Greinke and Mr. Miller
participating and responding to Council questions.
The motion by Edgar to table any further discussion on this issue died
for lack of a second.
It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to uphold the find-
ings of the Planning Commission approving Use Permit 83-28.
After further discussion, the motion carried 3-1, Greinke abstaining,
Kennedy dissenting on the basis of lack of input from the Board of
Education. 81
Councilman Greinke assured the Council and audience that his family is
proud of their name and reputation, and they would never do anything to
harm the community.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 12-19-83
IV.
PUBLIC UEARINGS
1. AENOED SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 6, HOLT NEI~HBORIIOOD PLAN (HOLT & WARREN
AVENUES) - RESOLUTION NO. 83-108
The Community Development Director presented the staff report and
recommendation as contained in the tnter-com dated December 19,
1983, prepared by the Community Development Department.
Ma~or Hbesterey opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. There being
no speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Greinke, to adopt the
following:
RESOLUTION NO. 83-108 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tusttn, California, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO SPECIFIC PLAN
NO. 6 IN REGARD TO UNIT DENSITY AND CIRCULATION (HOLT & WARREN
AVENUE)
Motion carried 5-0.
APPEAL CF AI~#DBI[NT NO. I TO USE PERMIT 80-3 - llJSTIN COldlIiRCE
CB*ER PHASE II, BURNEI'r-EHLINE CO. (18352-18376 IRVIIE BLVD.)
The Community Development Director presented the staff report and
recommendation as contained in the tnter-com dated December 19,
1983, prepared by the Community Development Department, and
[esponded to Council questions regarding parking requirements
including compact car parking), ingress/egress from the project
onto Irvine Boulevard, and utility undergrounding.
The public hearing was opened by MaY~r Hoesterey at 7:57 p.m.
Phillip Schwartze, applicant representative, spoke in favor of
Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit 80-3, and responded to Council quest
ttons.
Jim Vecchio, property owner on the southwest corner of Irvine and
Newport Boulevards, expressed concern that the proposed project is
not architecturally compatible ~th his existing Spanish tile roof
building, and requested that Council take same into consideration.
There being no other speakers on the matter, the public hearing was
closed at 8:13 p.m.
It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to iuphold the findings
of the Planning Commission approving Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit
80-3 and direct the developer to consider negotiating to purchase
the City's right-of-way for driveway.access from Newport Avenue.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding an access driveway off
of Newport Avenue. The Director of Public Works stated that it is
staff's position that a driveway should not be cut into Newport
Avenue for the following reasons: 1) The bike trail was con-
structed off-street with as much protected access as possible. 2)
If a driveway is cut into Newport, the location would be crucial.
A driveway opposite ingress/egress to Packers Square, or with
left-turn access from any opening on Newport, would create confu-
sion and cress-traffic on Newport. Staff recommends that any
driveway be located ~here it would have only right-turn ingress/
egress and no cross-traffic on Newport. 3) With traffic volumes
expected to increase on Newport Avenue, the least amount of access
to and from that street will help move traffic more efficiently.
4) A driveway would ~imtnate at least four parking spaces.
The City Attorney noted that in addition to safety aspects, the
City purchased the bike trail property from the railroad company
for a sufficient sum, and he would recommend against quitclaiming
access through same.
After further discussion, the motion carried 5-0.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 12-19-83
TERMINATION OF VARINIC£ 81-8 - CALIFORNXAN APARTI[IJTS, 14882-14942
NEWPORT AVENUE
Following consideration of the staff report dated December 19,
1983, prepared by the Community Development Department, the public
hearing was opened by Mayor Hoesterey at 8:28 p.m. There being no
speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed.
It ~as moved by Saltarellt, seconded by Gretnke, to accept the
Planning Commission recommendation and approve term(nation of Vari-
ance 81-8. Motion carried 5-0. 43
4. APPEAl. (]:* USE ~II¢IT 83-24 - 545 SOUTll 'B' Sll~E£T
The Community Development Director presented the staff report as
contained in the inter-com dated December 19, 1982, prepared by the
Community Development Department, responded to Council questions,
and.narrated slides for viewing by Counctlmembers.
Mayor Hoesterey opened the public hearing at 8:38 p.m. The follow-
ing persons spoke on the matter.
Terese Arndt, 535 South."B" Street, owner of property northerly of
the proposed project, stated she was informed at the Planning Com-
mission that the plans would be flipped so that the building does
not abut her property, and she wished to be reassured that same
would be approved by Council.
Charles Anderson, 255 West Sixth Street, southerly of the proposed
project, requested the fencing between properties and windows be
high enough for privacy purposes. Additionally, Mr. Anderson
reported a rodent problem, which Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy indicated
she would refer to the Orange County Vector Control District.
Walier Fredriksen, 12912 Dean Street, project applicant, spoke in
favor of Use Permit 83-24 as originally applied for as a five-unit
two-story apartment building based on full compliance with existing
codes. In response to Councilman Gretnke, Mr. Fredriksen stated he
was willing to comply with Mr. Anderson's fence request.
There being no other speakers on the matter, the public hearing was
closed at 8:54 p.m.
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve Use Per-
mit 83-24 with the five units, provided that the plans are flipped,
that the fence be a minimum of 6 feet, with the bottom 3 feet being
masonry block.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy spoke in favor of four units based on compat-
ibility with the area, density, and existing parking problems. The
substitute motion by Kennedy to uphold the Plaqntng Commission's
approval of four units died for lack of a second.
Following a question-and-answer period, the original motion carried
4-1, Kennedy opposed. 81
It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to direct
the Planning Commission to 1) review all substandard width R-3 par-
cels in the City, and those which do not meet Code requirements be
rezoned, and 2) compare disparities between requirements for apart-
ment buildings and requirements for condominiums. After Council
discussion, the motion carried 5-0. 81
CONSENT CALENDAR
Item 4 was removed from Consent Calendar by staff. It was moved by
Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve the remainder of the Consent
Calendar. Carried 5-0.
1. APPROV~ OF MIN~S - December 5, 1983
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 12-19-83
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $104,704.39
APPROVAL OF OEI~DS in the amount of $873,975.26
5O
RESOLtFrIOg NO. 83-105- A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLD-
ING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON
TUESDAY, APRIL 10, lg84, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF
SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIDNS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES
RESOI_I~TIOli NO. 83-106- A Resolution of the City council of the
City of Tustin, California, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE *CITY
RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD
IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1984
RESOLUTIO# la). 83-107- A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR
ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELEC-
TORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDATES STATEMENT FOR THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10,
1984 ·
Adopted Resolutions No. 83-105, 83'106, and 83-107 as ~ecom-
mended by the City Clerk. 48
RESOLUTIO# NO. 83-110- A Resolution of the City Council of the
City-of Tustin, California, APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982-83
'Adopted Resolution No. 83-110 as recommended b~ the Planning
Consul rant. 81
PROFOSED CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS, HOUSING AND
COMITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD)- (South "B" Street/
Mitohe11 area)
Approved the contract as submitted as recommended by the Com-
munt ty Development Department. 45
PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES INPROIfEMENTS, SPECIAL
JOBS BILL FUNOIIIG- (South "B" Street/Mitchell area)
Approved the contract as submitted as recommended by the Com-
munity Development Department. 45
RESOLUTION NO. 83-113- A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE IN THE
ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF MYFORD ROAD
FROM THE TERMINUS OF THE MOULTON PARKWAY FAU PROJECT TO MICHELLE
DRIVE
Adopted Resolution No. 83-113 and directed staff to prepare an
agreement for execution by both the Cities of Irvine and Tustin
to' provide for the construction of Myford Road between the
A.T. & S.F. Railroad and Myford Road as recommended by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 45
AGREI~IIT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL PAIIITENANCE
Authorized the Mayor to execute the Traffic Signal Maintenance
Agreement between Santa Aha and Tusttn for Red Hill at Warner,
McFadden at Tustin Village Way, McFadden at Williams, and
McFadden at Ritchey as recommended by the Director of Public
Works/City Engt neet. 45
10.
RESOLUTIOli NO. 83-114 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, DESIGNATING PLACEMENT OF CERTAIN S'FOP
SIGNS (S~camore and Carfax)
Adopted Resolution No. 83-114 as requested by the City Council.
94
CI~ COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 12-19-83
11. REQ~'r FOR RESTRIC~D PAR~IIJG - PEPPERTM~E CIRCLE AMD
CIRCE ~R~E~Y ~ ~C~
Approved ~e Installation of "No Parking 6:00' a.m. ~ 1Z Noon,
Monda~ during Street Sweep, nB Operations'' signs along Pepper-
tree Circle and Cherr~od Ci~le northerly of. S~amore Avenue
and ~hat only ~rnings be issu~ for a period of 30 da~ after
installation as ~o~ended by ~e Dir~tor of Public Works/
Ci ~y Engi herr. 75
12. ~I~ ~. 83-111 - A Resolution of ~6 City Council of the
City of Tus~in, California, INDICATING ITS IN~NT ~ IMPLEMENT
HEREIN DEFINED "REASONABLE AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES" FROM THE
1982 ~VIStON ~ ~E AIR QUALI~ ~NAGEMENT PLAN FOR ~E SOUTH
COAST AIR BASIN
Adopt~ Resolution No. 83-111 as ~o~end~ by ~e C~unity
D~el opment Oepar~ent.
13. ~NT IN ~Y ~ ~AI~R ~S ~R ~ CI~ ABel'S
O~ICE
Grant~ increases in subj~t fees as contain~ in ~e m~o rrm
the City Attorney, da~ed 11-30-83, as reviewed by the City
Manager.
VI.
VII.
Consent Calendar Iten No. 4 - Bullet Train EIR, ResoluUon No. 83-109 -
Per staff's request, it was moved by Saltarellt, seconded by Edgar,
that the following be tabled:
m
RESOLUTION go. 83-109- A Resolution of the City Council of the.
City of Tustin, California, REQUESTING THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION TO DIRECTLY CONTRACT THE PREPARATION OF THE BULLET
TRAIN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Carried 5-0. 101
OROIIINICES FOR INTRDOUCTION - None
OROI#AJJCES FOR ADOPTION
1. EXTEIiSION (IF BINGO LICENSES - ORDINAMCE gO. 900
It was moved by Sal~arelli, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No.
900 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following
second reading by title only of Ordinance No. gUU by the City
Clerk, it was moved by Edgar~ seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance
No. go0 be passed and adopted as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 900 - - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City
of Tustin, California, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE TO
EXTENSION OF BINGO LICENSES
Roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli
None
None
31
2. SALES & USE TAX - ORDINAIICE gO. 901
The City Manager responded to Council questions. It was moved by
Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 901 have first
reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading of
Ordinance No. 901 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, sec-
onded b~ Greinke, that Ordinance No. 901 be introduced. Motion
carri eU b-O.
:t was, then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance
N.o. gO, have second reading by title only. Following second read-
lng of Ordinance No. aol by the City Clerk, it was moved by
Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 901 be passed and
adopted as loll ows:
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 12-19-83
OROINANCE !10. 901 - An URGENCY Ordinance of the City of Tustin,
California, AMENDING TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTIONS 2311 TO 2318 'AND
ADDING SECTION 2319
Roll call vote:
AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli ·
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
97
VIII.
NEW
1.
B~IESS
HOULTON PARKWAY FAU PROdECT H-H032(O04) - APPROVAL OF I~OR CON-
TRACT CHANGE ORDER
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the tnter-com dated
December 12, 1983, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was
moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve contract change
order No. 10 for the Moulton Parkway FAU Project M-M032(O04).
After a brief question-and-answer period, the motion carried 5-0.
XXo
2. gATER 1ILL LOCATION STUDY
The Dtrector of Public Works presented the staff report and recom-
mendation as contained in his inter-com dated December 12, 1983.
It ms then moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to drill two
wells, at Sites 2 and 3, and delay any blending until there is an
awareness of the water quality, and that the money for the wells
be funded with Redevelopment Agency funds.
Council discussion followed, and the Director of Public Works
responded to Council questions.
A substitute motion was made b~ Greinke, Seconded by Kennedy, to
continue the matter to January3, lg84, and direct staff to prepare
cost savings for the drilling of two wells, instead of one. Car-
ried 5-0. 107
3. 198~ RISS TUSTIN TAL[NT SHOW AND PAGEANT AGREEMENT
As recommended in the lnter-com dated December 12, 1983, prepared
by the Recreation Superintendent, it was moved by Saltarelli~ sec-
onded by Edgar, to approve subject agreement for the use of City
facilities by the Tustin jaycees for the 1984 Miss Tustin Talent
Show and Pageant and authorize the Director of Community and Admin-
istrative Services to sign the agreement. Motion carried 5-0. 45
RE;q~RTS
1. PU~NI~ CO~ISSI(M( ACTIONS - DECEMBER 12, 1983
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded b~ Kennedy, to appeal Use Per-
mit 83-25, Public Hearing Item No. i on the December 12, 1983,
Planning Commission Action Agenda. Carried 4-1, Greinke opposed.
81
The remainder of the December 12, 1983, Planning Commission Action
Agenda was ratified by unanimous informal consent. 80
2. ~N~ SIIARING CONI~IANCE AUDIT
As recommended in the tnter-com dated December 14, 1983, prepared
by the Finance Director, it was moved by Edgar, seconded ~
Hoesterey, to receive and file subject report. Carried 5-0.
OTHER BUSI~SS
PERSONNEL I~TTERS - RESOI. UTIOM NO. oo-~xa
Pursuant to the city Manager's recommendation, it was
Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following:
moved by
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 12-19-83
RESOLUTION IlO. 83-115 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPEN-
SATION, AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-
MANAGEMENT ~NERAL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF llJSTIN
Carried 4-1, Grei nke opposed.
79
2. CABLE l~ FRANCHISE - ORDINAN(3i NO. 902
The City A~torney presented the staff report and recomaendation as
contained in his inter-com dated December 19, i983.
Mayor Hoesterey e~pressed his dissatisfaction with the manner in
which the matter has been handled by CommuniCom.
Pursuant to the City Attorney's recommendation, it was moved by
Hoesterey~ seconded by Saltarellt, t~jt Ordinance No 902 have
flrst reading by tlt)e Only. carrled 50. Follovrlng first reading
of Ordinance No. 902 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Saltarelli,
seconded by Hoestarey, that Ordinance No. 902 be introduced as
fOllOwS:
XI.
ORDINANCE RD. 902 - An Ordinance of the City of Tusttn, California,
A~ENDING THE FRANCHISE FOR A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM GRANTED TO SIX
STAR CAJ)LEVISION OF TUSTIN, INC. AND APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF
OWNERSHIP FROM SIX STAR CABLEVISION OF TUSTIN, INC. TO UNITED CABLE
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, LTD.
After further discussion, the motion carried 3-2, Edgar and Gretnke
opposed. 53
3. PROTECTIVE 2)OIiIIIG PEIilIL:TER R)R 1~StlC INSTIllITION$
In-accor~lance with Mayor Pro Tom Kennedy's request,' Council con-
cuPred to direct ~taff to bring before the Planning Commission dis-
~n of land uses surrounding public institutions (i.e., motels
and liquor licenses near public schools). 81
4. ' REDHILL AVEIi~ UTILITY UNI~RGRflUII)ING
In accordance with Councilman Edgar's recommendation, there was
unanimous informal consent that staff investigate redirecting Edi-
son funds for utility undergroundtng from the delayed 17th Street
project to Red Hill Avenue (from Sycamore to Walnut) for the
January[6, 1984, meeting.
5. Cf~UI'ERIZEI) $IONAI. IZ~IION ~f$101
Councilman Edg~r requested that staff respond to his memo on the
possibility of having the same city-wide computerized traffic
signal system as used by the City of Santa Ana. 94
6. USE OF COUIi*IT WELFARE RDII~RS IN COI~ONII"t
Councilman Edgar shared an article whereby the Cities of Buena Park
and Santa Aha utilize County welfare recipients to perform jobs for
their respective cities. The City Manager indicated staff would
look into the possibility of participating in subject program. 79
Councilman Saltarellt left the meeting at 9:52 p.m.
R~CESS - REDEVELOPt~NT; CLOSED SESSION; AI~IQURNI~HT
At 9:53 p.m. it was moved by Gretnke, seconded by Hoesterey, to recess
to the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session for discussion
of legal matters, and thence adjourn to the next Adjourned Regular
Meeting on Tuesday, January 3, lgB4. Carried 4-0, Saltarelli absent.
HI#U~S OF A REGULAR I~EETING
OF Tile REDE¥1~LOP~#T AGENC~ OF
T~E CITf OF 1USTI#, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 19, 1983
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Hoesterey at 8:44 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tu.sttn, California.
ROll CIILL
Agency Members Present:
Agency Members Absent:
Others Present:
3. APPROVAL OF MZNUTES
Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman
Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Frank H. Greinke
Donald J..Saltarelli
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager
Mary E. W~mn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
Donald O. Lamm. Com. Development Director
Ronald A. Nault, Director of Finance
Captain. N. Williams, Police Department
Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Publi~ Works
Royleen A. White, Com. & Admin. Services Director
Jeff Kol t n, Recreation Superintendent
Approximately 25 in the audience
It was moved by Gretnke, seconded by Edgar, to approve the minutes of the
December 5, lg83, meeting, Carried 4JO, Saltarellt absent.
APPROVAL OF OEMANOS
It was moved by Edgar~ seconded by Greinke, to approve demands for the.
month of November, 19U3, In the amount ct '$9,911.60 as recommended by the
Finance Director. Motion carried 4-0, Saltarelli absent. 81
5. DES]gl REVIEW, 14772 PLAZA ORI1E - RESOLUTION lO. RDA 83-8
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated December
lg, 1983, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved
by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to adopt the following:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 83-8 - A Resolution of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING THE DESIGN OF AN
OFFICE BUILDING TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 14772 PLAZA DRIVE AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION VARIANCE NO. 83-9
Carried 4-0, Sal tarel 1 t absent.
~NDI~NT BO. IlO USE P~RMIT 81)-3 - RESOLUTION W). RDA 83-9
81
As recommended in the inter-com dated December 19, 1983, prepared by the
Community Development Department, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by
Edgar, to adopt Resolution No. RDA 83-9 subject to the condition that all
overhead utility lines adjoining the property along the Holt Avenue and
Irvine Boulevard frontages shall be placed underground in conformance with
the objectives of the Town Center Redevelopment Plan as referenced in
Exhibit "B" to be attached to subject resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 83-9 - A Resolution of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING THE DESIGN OF AN
OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 18352-18376 IRVINE
BOULEVARD AS ~LoPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO USE PERMIT 80-3
Carried 4-0, Saltarelli absent. 81
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ..,lUTES
Page 2, 12-19-83
In accordance with action of the City Council, it was moved by Edgar, sec-
onded by Kennedy, to continue to January 3~ 1984, subject matter. Motion
carried 4-0, Saltarelli absent. ~
8. HOLIDAY [ECORATIONS IN CIVIC CENTER
Chairperson Pro Tem Kennedy thanked staff for decorating the pine tree in
the Civic Center compound for the holiday season.
9. UTILITY UNI)ERGROUNOING
The Agency concurred with Mr. Edgar to approvepoliCy direction to autho-
rize staff to commit Redevelopment funds to complete undergrounding in
conjunction with the Tustin Commerce Center construction, with staff to
come back with a specific dollar amount appropriation. 104
10. EL CAMINO ~[AL OECORATIItI[ BRICK SETTLING
Mr. Greinke reported that the decorative brick by Tastee Freeze seems to
be settling and requested that staff investigate same.
11. AD,)OURNI~E#T
At 9:57 p.m., it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn to
the next Adjourned Regular Meeting on Tuesday, January 3, 1984. Carried
4-0, Saltarelli absent.
SECRETLY