The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1 MINUTES 12-05-83MI#UTES OF A REGULAR ~EETING OF 1HE CITY COUNCIL OF lliE CITY OF TUSTI#, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 21, 1983 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/IN¥OCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hoesterey at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Saltarelli, and the Invocation was given by Mayor Hoesterey. II. NOLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Counctlpersons Absent: Others Present: III. PUBLIC INPUT I¥. Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Richard B. Edgar Frank H. Greinke Donald J. Saltarelli None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald O. Lamm, Com. Development Director Ronald A. Nault, Director of Finance Captain Williams, Police Department Robert S. Ledendecker, Dtr. of Public Works Royleen A. White, Com. & Admin. S~vcs. Dir. Approximately 11 in the audience None. PUBLIC HZA~I#~ None. CONSENT CALENOAR Item 8 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Gretnke. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the remainder of the Co~ Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. 1. AJ~ROVAL ~F MINUTES - November 7, 14, and 15, 1983 2. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $105,677.26 APPROVAL OF I)E~iJ41)S in the amount of $2,155,956.98 50 REJECTION OF CLAIR OF TERESA JOE OLSON; DATE OF LOSS: 6-14-83; DATE FILED: 9-12-83; CLAIll NO. 83-31 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 RESOLUTION NO. 83-97 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, CREATING A DEBT SERVICE SURCHARGE FUND Adopted Resolution No. 83-97 as recommended by the Finance Director. 50 RESOLUTION NO, 83-99 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-20 AMENDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF. EIGHTEEN RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUMS LOCATED AT 14452, 14472, 14492 HOLT AVENUE Adopted Resolution No. 83-99 as directed by the City Council. RES~UTION NO. 83-100 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, IN SUPPORT OF .RELICENSING OF HYDRO- ELECTRIC PROJECTS TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Adopted Resolution No. 83-100 as requested by the Edison Company. 104 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 11-21-83 R~SOLUTIO# NO. 83-102 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, COMMENDING RONALD W. REAGAN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES Adopted Resolution No. 83-102 as requested by the City Council. Consent Calendar Ite~#o. 8 - L. P. Repertory P~oductton - The Director of Community and Administrative Services responded to Councilman Gretnke pertaining to total costs to the City for the 1983 production. It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the 1984 agreement with L. P. Repertory as presented and recommended by the Recreation Superintendent in his inter-com dated November 14, 1983. Carried 5-0. 45 83-39 VI. VII. ORI)IItAMCES FOR I#llUI)UCTIOII 1. PR~-ZOIIE 83-1 - ORDX#A#C£ NO. 899 In accordance with the tnter-com dated November 21, 1983, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 899 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 8gg by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, sec- onded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 899 be introduced as ORDINA#CE NO. 899 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ADOPTING PRE-ZONE 83-1, AUTHORIZING THAT 14452, 14472, 14492 HOLT AVENUE BE ZONED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-3 (2800) UPON ITS ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN Carried 5-0. 109 ORDINANCES' FOR ADOPTION 1. ZO#IIJG ORDI#AIIC£ AI~NOI~IIT NO. 83-3 - ORDIIU~iCE IlO. 896 It was moved by Edgar, Seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 896 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Follo~dng second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 896 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordi- nance No. 896 be adopted as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 896 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE BY REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR LIQUOR STORES, HOTELS AND MOTELS, BOWLING ALLEYS AND CONSTRUCTION OF PROFESSIONAL OR GENERAL OFFICE BUILDINGS Councilman Saltarelli expressed concern that Ordinance No. 896 goes beyond his original intention to require a use permit for persons with commercially zoned property wanting to construct an office building, and he questioned the magnitude Of the ordinance. The Community Development Director apologized for the ordinance length, but stated it reflects the type of City zoning ordinance, described as a "pyramid type" ordinance, which is very repetitive. Councilman Gretnke felt the proposed ordinance will have the net effect of spiraling professionally-zoned land values. Mayor Hoesterey commented Council's intent was to require Use Permits for office buildings in commercial districts to protect the tax base, which is far less for office buildings than commercial uses. A question-and-answer period followed. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli Greinke None 81 Council concurred to review Ordinance No. 896 in six months. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 11-21-83 VIII. IX. Xe XI. OLD NEW 1. B~SINESS - None BUSINESS ORANGE COUNIY TRANSPORTATION' CO~ISSION (O~l~) PROPOSED TRANSPORTA- TION IliVESI'~NT PROGRAM The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recom- mendation as contained in his inter-com dated November 14, 1983. The City Manager added that the only new information is that the key date for Council to take formal action is February 13, 1984. Following a question-and-answer period, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to direct staff to forward the list of addi- tional projects to the Orange County Transportation Commission for inclusion into the 15-year Transportation Investment program, sub- ject to further refinement by City Council once the list has been finalized throughout the County, and to respond to the Orange County Transportation Commission questions as indicated, with reservations pertaining to references made to AMTRAK. Carried 5-0. REPORTS 1. PLANNING C~ISSION ACTIONS - ROVEI~ER 14, 1983 The November 14, 1983, Planning Commission Action Agenda was rati- fied by unanimous informal consent. Z. IRVINE BOUt~VARD TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATION(INFORMATIONAL REPORT) It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report dated November 14, 1983, prepared by the Director of Public Works. CaPried 5-0. 94 OTHER BUSINE~ REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session for discussion of personnel matters. Z. COI~NDATION TO PAINTE#ANCE DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARll~NT Councilman Saltarelli commended the Maintenance Division on their~ efficient removal of the huge eucalyptus trees on San Juan Street. 3. DISBURSENENT OF PROCEEDS FROM WATER BOND SALE Councilman Edgar led discussion on subject matter and a question- and-answer period followed. It ms then moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to disburse the bond money in accordance with the arithmetic contained in the inter-com dated November 16, 1983, pre- pared by Councilman Edgar in order to close out the bond sale transaction. Motion carried 5-0. 107 4. BUSINESS LICENSE FEES Councilman Edgar suggested that differentiation be made between those companies who pay sales tax revenue to the City and those who do not and that fees be based on number of employees and/or gross receipts, in attempts to strive for an equitable business license fee. The City Manager provided clarification on the infor- mation to which Councilman Edgar was making reference. The Mayor requested that Council hold-off discussion on the matter until the December 5, 1983, meeting, for which same is agendized. BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT FOR VOLUNTEER GROUPS Councilman Edgar suggested a beautification project for community groups expressing interest in performing volunteer work for the City. He stated that a list could be compiled of "brick canyon" areas in need of cleaning. These are areas where a block wall CITf COUNCIL MINUTES Page ¢, 11-21-83 separates private property from the sidewalk, and the property owner does not feel responsible for maintenance of the sidewalk on the other side of the wall, the street sweeperdoes not reach up to the sidewalk, nor does the City have funds to maintain that area. The City Manager indicated staff would investigate same. 86 6. 14INO$OR GJUU)E#S UPOA1]E ~PORT In response to Councilman Edgar, the Director of Community Develop- ment Department provided an oral update report on the .Windsor Gar- dens Condominium Conversion project. He stated that Cal State Associates has now gone into a Joint agreement with a previous partial-owner, Manhattan Beach ConStruction Company, and they' re moving fences around and getting ready to start pouring concrete. However, the City has not received all the appropriate insurance certificates, etc., from the contractor, and staff will continue to monitor same. 43 ?. TUSTIN ~IFI£D SCNO(O. OISTRICT NOM, D ~ EDUCATION Councilman Saltarelli suggested that the Council schedule a meeting with the reorganized Tustin Unified School District Board of Educa- tion for discussion of mutual problems, communications, joint needs and concerns, etc. Mayor Hoesterey indicated the first quarter of 1984 would be acceptable and there was unanimous informal consent. Councilman Gretnke requested that the Mayor forward congratulatory letters to the one reelected and two newly-elected members of the Board of Education. Council concurred, gO 9. BULLET TRAIN Mayor Hoesterey reported that the Cities of Oceanstde and Carlsbad have adopted resolutions supporting legal action against the bullet train.. It was then moved by Hoestere~, .seconded by Edgar, to take whatever steps are necessary to startlegal action. Carried 5-0. lOX XII. RECESS -. REDEVELOPMENT - CLOSED SESSION - RECONVE#ED XIII. At 8:09 p.m., it was moved by Greinke, seconded b~Hoesterey, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session for discussion of personnel matters. 'Carried $'0. The City Council meeting was reconvened at 8:29 p.m. with all members present. PERSONNEL NATll~RS - RESOLUTION NO. 83-101 By way of action out of Closed Session, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. B)-lO1 - A Resolution of the CitY Council of the City of Tustin, California, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-SWORN POLICE EMPLOY- EES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN. Carried 4-1, Greinke opposed. 79 XIV. AD,IOURNME#T The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. to the next regular meeting on December 5, 1983, by unanimous informal consent. MAY OR CIIY CLERK