Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNB 3 STORM DRAIN 11-07-83 Il-,-;..'t . 3 " 11-7-83 ~ MBER 1, 1983 lnt:er-Com TO: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER DALE A. WICK, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: RED HILL STORM DRAIN FACILITY NO. F10P01 CONTRACTOR REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, at their meeting of November 7, 1983, consider the contractors attached request for an extension of time on subject contract, and either deny the request or grant a time extension as they feel is appropriate. BACKGROUND: The contract specification require that time extensions must be approved by the City Council. The penalty in this contract is $100.00 for each calendar days delay in completing the work in excess of the allotted calendar days. The completion time allotted for this project was 100 calendar days plus 5 additional days for work added to the contract for a total of 105 calendar days from the date of contract execution by the City. Regarding the contractors attached request, his lost time due to rain days and encountering.of interfering utilities has been taken into consideration. A total of 3 days has been added due to rain days and another 2 or 3 days will be added due to additi6nal time required because of interfering utilities. These type of time extensions are handled by staff and do not require City Council approval. Plans and specifications for this project were completed by staff on a "crash program" in hopes of completing the Red Hill storm drain prior to the rainy season and also prior to the beginning of school with. the inherent additional traffic congestion which school traffic adds to Red Hill Avenue. The 100 calen~ar days plus five days, which we programmed into the project, included 30 days for pipe manufacturing which we felt would result in the following timetable: July 18, 1983 - City Executes Contract and Contractor Orders Pipe. Aug. 17, 1983 - Pipe Delivered and Contractor Begins Work. Oct. 31, 1983 - Contractor Completes Work. After the contract was executed by the City (July 18, 1983) we made attempts to obtain a definite starting date from the contractor. The contractors response was that he could not obtain pipe delivery until September 31, 1983. We checked this out with the pipe manufacturer and they stated that the September 31, 1983 date was a mutually agreed upon date and the indication was that an earlier date could have been arranged. November 1, 1983 William Huston, City Manager Red Hill Storm Drain Facility No. FIOPO1 Contractor Request For Time Extension Page 2 The pipe manufacturer also stated that normal pipe delivery time from date of order is about seven weeks. Assuming a seven week pipe delivery time would have resulted in the following timetable: July 18, 1983 - City Executes Contract and Contractor Orders Pipe Sept. 5, 1983 - Pipe Delivered and Contractor Begins Work Nov. 19, 1983 - Contractor Completes Work The above timetable would have required granting the contractor a 19 calendar day time extension to allow for the additional pipe manufacturing time. In reality, the contractor started preliminary work on the pro~ect on September 26, 1983 and did not actually start laying mainline pipe until October 20, 1983. Staff feels that the main reason that the contractor was slow in starting his work in Tustin is that he was very busy and had other commitments and other projects to complete, although, this is only our assumption and we have no actual proof of this. We do not feel that pipe manufacturing time was a factor since some of the 54" pipe delivered to the.job had a date marking on it of Aug. 3, 1983. We feel the pipe was available if the contractor had wanted it delivered. Also attached for the City Councils information, is a chronological record of correspondence which has ensued regarding the starting date for this project. Desatoff Construction 'Co. is an excellent contractor. They completed the Irvine Blvd. storm drain project for the City 2 years ago with no problems and in a minimum amount of time. The fact that they may have submitted intelligent low bids to several agencies and were awarded several contracts at the same time is to their credit, although it has caused some problems for the City. Dale A. Wick Assistant City Engineer jr Attachments CC: City Clerk City Attorney Desatoff Construction Co. SATOFF CONSTRUCTION - COMPANY License No. 27303 ~-A P.O. Box 5515 · ~5606 G~le Avenue, Suite ! · H~:ienda Heights, California 9174.5 (213) 96~-074.? - Mr. Dale A. Wick City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, Calif. 92680 RE: Extention of Time Dear Mr. Wick: I would like to respond to your letter of October 12th, outlining the procedures in requesting extention of time. We are asking for an extention of sixty days, (60) to our contract. We feel we are justified in asking for this time due to the delay in the ufacturi~g of the pine. We were in constant touch with the pipe company and as soon as we became aware of the availability of the pipe we began to move-on the project. Also, as we. be&an the project, we had scme rain and added days were' needed to allow the ground to dry out'completely. I.would like to restate, as Der our orior letter to you, that we would have disruoted everyone involved if we had to move on and off the job at the slow availability of the pipe. If we conducted our work in this way, no one would benefit. Further, since we have started the project, we have encountered seve~l interfering utilities not shown on the plans, which I am sure you are well aware of. We do not anticipate having to use the full 60 days, however these sixty days would include some of the time lost due to these interfering utility lines. We sincerely hope you grant us the extention of time that we ask for so that our present work can continue to run smooth and efficiently. MJD/pjd July 19, 1983 De?artment of ~blic lforbs/Engi, ieering Desatoff Construction Co. P.O. Box 5515 Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 RE: S?ORM DRAIN X)(PROVEI~N?S LOCA?IONS A,B, & C Gentlemen: Enclosed, please find your fully executed copy of the contract for subject project. Per Section O-IV, Page 0-2 of the specifications, the completion date for this project will be 100 calendar days from the July 18, 19B3 date that the contract was executed by the City, or October 26, 1983x The contract starting date for determination of contract calendar days is July 19, 1983. Per Section O-IV, you are required to begin work within 30 calendar days of date of contract execution, or by Auq. 17. 198R. In addition, if your quotation for Contract Change Order No. 1 is acceptable to the City, we will add an additional ~ calendar days to the contract. We also wish to point out the liquidated damage clause in said Section O-IV of the specifications. The City is hopeful that'you will-be able to begin work earlier than the required schedule. In particular, we would like to complete the work at Location 'A" (Red Hill Ave.) before school starts. School traffic contributes heavily to the congestion on Red Hill Avenue and we believe that your traffic control will be ) simplified if you do not have to contend with the school traffic. Please contact me at your earliest convenience regarding the pre-construction conference. Very truly yours, Dale A. Wick Assistant City Engineer db Attachment $00 Centennial Way · Tustin, California 92680 · (714~ $44-8890 August 17, 1983 Deloartment of Public Oesatoff Construction Co. P.O. Box 5515 Hactenda Heights, CA 91745 RE: STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS LOCATIONS Gentlemen: This is to remind you that per Section D-IV of the project specifications, ~ug. 17, 1983 was the latest date which you were 'to start work on subject project, although the actual starting date is immaterial as long as the completion date is met. The completion date for this project is October 31~ I983, which date includes a five day extension to account for CCO ~1. It is imperative that this completion date be met and that all work be completed by this date so as to preclude any delays due to possible wet weather. Please contact me at your earliest convenience regarding your intended scheduling for this project. Very truly yours, Dale A. Wick Assistant City Engineer db .~00 Cente..ial k'a~y * Tusti., Califor.ia 92680 * (714) $44-8890 I'~ Y D F~ O C C lW D U I T CORPORA TION August 22, 1983 Desatoff Construction Co. P. o. Box 55i5 Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 Dear Mottle: Re: City of Tustin, Stm. Drn. Impvts. Redhill Fac. ~F1PO1 & SIP58, etc. S.O.: To conf~rm our telephone conversation of August 8, 1983, pipe for the above project will be available for shipment on September 31, 1983. Thank you for your business. Very truly yours, HYDRO CONDUIT CORPORATION Jack Duffy Senior Sales Representative JD:pam A subs,Chary of .... POST OFFICE BOX 939 23200 TEMESCAL CANYON ROAD CORONA· CALIFORNIA 91720~"~'~ PHONE (714) 735-2~20.541.5~?~ CONSTRUCTION '~, COMPANY _,,,~'",~/ Lkens¢ .~o. 273033-A P.O. Box 5515 · ]5606 Gale Avenue, Suitel · Hacienda Heights, Ca~i£ornia91745 (21~1) 96]-0747 - 961-0748 August 24, 1983 Mr. D~le Wick Assistant City ~ugineer 300 Centennial Way Tustin, Calif. 92680 RE: Storm Drain Improvements Locations A,B,&C RECEIVE[. ALJ8 2 G '~ ' '[USTINBy PUB~.~ORKS DEP1. D~ar Mr. Wick, Here is a copy of the letter we Just received from the pipe company. As you will see, they will have some pipe ready for delivery starting around September 31, 1983. We are in the process of trying to get a starting date from our Sub- Contractor for the structures. As soon as we do, we will forward that date and a date of our approximate starting date. We thank you for your co-operation in this matter. Respectfully Submitted, M~rrie J./Desatoff //, De'satoff ~onstructi~n 'Co. MJD/pjd September 6, 1983 De?artment of Public Works/Engineerin2 Desatoff Construction Company P.O. Box 5515 Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 RE: STOP, H DRAIN IMPROVEI~!NTS LOCATIONS A,B,& C Gentlemen: We are in receipt of your correspondence dated Aug. 24, 1983 and the correspondence from Hydro Conduit Corporation dated Aug. 22, 1983. Your indicated starting date for this project of September 31, 1983 is unacceptable to the City. We have checked with Hydro Conduit Corporation and they have indicated that an earlier delivery date for pipe could be arranged. In fact, the City recently ordered some pipe from Hydro Conduit Corporation and received delivery in three weeks. We feel that the 30 calendar days from the date of contract execution which was programmed into the specifications for pipe delivery and which would have permitted an Aug. 17, 1983 starting date was adequate. In addition, the Aug. 17, 1983 starting date would have permitted the work on Red Hill Avenue, a critical arterial in the City of Tustin, to be completed prior to when school starts. Now, 'school traffic will add to the congestion on Red Hill with the resulting complaints from motorists who utilize this street. In addition, we feel there are other phases of the project which do not hinge on pipe delivery and which could be started~ The fact that re-paving operations will now probably have to be performed under wet weather conditions also upsets us. Consequently, we wish to tnform you that the City fully intends to assess liquidated damages on this project if the work is not completed within the prescribed contract time plus the time extension allowed for CCO #1. Very truly yours, Dale A. Wick Assistant City Engineer bh cc: City Attorney 300 Centennial Way · Tustin, California 92680 · (714) 544-8890 '..~cessful bidder simult:neously with the execution of th~ _ontract will be .~..~d to furnish a labor and material bond in an amount equal to fifty percent . of the contract price, and a faithful performance bond in an amount equal to one ired percent (100%) of the contract price; and bonds shall be of the form attached ~ Section C and secured from a surety company rated Grade A or better and Class IX or etter by the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, and shall be authorized to ire such bond in the State of California and shall be subject to the approval and acceptance of the City Council and City Attorney. rD'IV BEGINNING OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION, AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Attention is directed to the provisions in Section 8-1.03 "Beginning of Work,"and to Section 8-1.06 "Time of Completion," and to Section 8-1.07 "Liquidated Damages" of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. The contractor shall begin work within thirty (30) calendar days after the date that the contract has been executed by the City, and shall diligently prosecute the same to completion before the expiration of one hundred {100) calendar days from date of said contract execution by the City. The contractor shall pay the 'City of Tustin as liquidated damages the sum of one hundred dollars ($100.00) per day for each and every calendar day's delay in finishing  e work in excess of the number days prescribed herein and any extensions thereof anted by the City Council. of D-V GENERAL Legal Relations and Responsibility. Reference is made to Section 7 of the Standard Specifications. Additionally, the contractor shall have the following obligations. The contractor shall also defend, idemnify and save harmless the City and each ~ its officers and employees and agents from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description, including potential claims and suits, with respect to the failure, neglect or refusal of contractor to faithfully perform the work and all of the contractor's obligations under the contract. This defense and indemnification by contractor shall specifically include all costs of defense which may be incurred by City or its employees, officers, or agents with respect to such claim or suit. Such costs, expenses, and damages shall include all costs incurred by the City, or its employees, officers or agents to defend against any claims, stop notices or lawsuits based thereon in which any of them is made a party. Highway Construction Equipment. Attention is directed to Sections 7-1.02 of the Standard Specifications. Prevailing Wages. The CITY OF TUSTIN has obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime work in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft or type of work needed to execute this contract, and the same has been filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Contractor agrees that not less than said prevailing rates shall be paid to workers employed on this public works contract as required by Labor Code Sections 1771 and 1774 of the State of California. Subsistence Pay. Section 1773.8 of the Labor Code of the State of California, regarding the payment of travel and subsistence payments, is applicable to this contract. 0-2