HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 11-07-83TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING
October 24, 1983 7:30 p.m.
REPORTS
NO. 1
11-7-83
CALL TO ORDER
7:40 P.M., CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
Present: Atnslie, White, Sharp
Absent: Puckett, Well
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approved as SUbmitted
PUBLIC CONCERNS
FOR MEETING HELD October 10, 1983
(limited to 3 minutes per person for
items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION
ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS
LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO,
PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS
FOR THE RECORD
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT
CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL
BE ENACTED BY' ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE
NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS
PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE
MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION,
STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS
TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.
1. Adoption of Resolution No. 2119
Pre-Zone 83-1
Adopted, 3-0.
2. Adoption of Resolution No. 2120
Use Permit 83-20
Adopted, 2-1, Sharp opposed.
.CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
1. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12018
Applicant: Richard Pierce
Location: Properties at the southeasterly corner of Warren Avenue and Holt
Avenue (Annexation No. 133 area)
Request: Authorize subdivision of the property for townhome purposes
As rec~mended by staff, public hearing continued to next regular meeting on
November 14, 1983.
Planning Action Commission Agenda
October 24, 1983
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. VARIANCE 83-8
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Systems Engineering and Construction Co. on behalf of Walter J.
Fredriksen
545 South "B" Street
Authorization to develop a five-unit apartment complex and vary
from the minimum'lot frontage of the Multiple-Family Residential
(R-3) District.
Withdrawn by staff to allow proper readverttsement.
Nove~aer 14, 1983.
2. USE PERMIT 83-21
Applicant: Robert Ridgway
Rescheduled to meeting on
Location: 185 Myrtle
Request: Authorization to contruct a guest house without kitchen facilities
Approved 3-0.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS:
1. Old Business
None.
2. New Business
1. Workshop - Multiple Zone Standards
Discussed after adjournment of regular meeting.
STAFF CONCERNS:
1. Departmental Status Report
Received and filed.
2. Report on Council Actions - October 17 1983
Received and filed.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
None.
ADJOURNMENT: At 8:06 p.m. to a workshop session and thence to next regular
meetin§ on Nove~r 14, 1983.
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSIO,
AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING
October 24, 1983 7:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
7:30 P.M., CITY COUNCIL CH~d~BERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WEIL, WHITE, SHARP
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
FOR MEETING HELD October 10, 1983
PUBLIC CONCERNS
(limited to 3 minutes per person for
items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION
ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS
LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO,
PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS
FOR THE RECORD
CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT
CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL
BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE
NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS
PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE
MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION,
STAFF OR PUBLIC REQU£ST SPECIFIC ITEMS
TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.
1. Adoption of Resolution No. 2119
Pre-Zone 83-1
2. Adoption of Resolution No. 2120
Use Permit 83-20
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
1. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12018
Applicant: Richard Pierce
Location: Properties at the southeasterly corner of Warren Avenue and Holt
Avenue (Annexation No. 133 area)
Request: Authorize subdivision of the property for townhome purposes
Ed Knight, Associate Planner
Planning Commission Agenda
October 24, 1983
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. VARIANCE 83-8
Applicant: Systems Engineering and Construction Co. on behalf of Walter J.
Fredriksen
Location: 545 South "B" Street
Request: Authorization to develop a five-unit apartment complex and vary
from the minimum lot frontage of the Multiple-Family Residential
(R-3) District.
Presentation: Alan Warren, Senior Planner
2. USE PERMIT 83-21
Applicant: Robert Ridgway
Location: 185 Myrtle
Request: Authorization to contruct a guest house without kitchen facilities
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS:
1. Old Business
None.
2. New Business
1. Workshop - Multiple Zone Standards
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
STAFF CONCERNS:
1. Departmental Status Report
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
2. Report on Council Actions - October 17 1983
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
ADJOURNMENT: To next regular meeting on November 14, 1983
MI#~S ~ A ~GU~ ~ING
OF ~£ ~NING ~ISSION
OF ~£ elm ~ lll~IN, ~IFOIIIIIA
October 10, 1083
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 7:32 p.m. in the
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The Pledge of
Allegiance was led by Commissioner Ainslie and the Invocation was given
by Commissioner Puckett..
ROLL CALL
Commissioners
Present:
Commissioners
Absent:
Also present:
James B. Sharp, Chairman
Ronald White, Chairman Pro Tem
Mark Ainslie
Charles Puckett
Kathy Well
Alan Warren, Senior Planner
Ed Knight, Associate Planner
Lydia Levin, Deputy City Attorney
Janet Hester, Recording Secretary
MINUTES
It was moved by Puckett, seconded b~ Atnslte, to approve the minutes of
the regular meeting hela September 26, 1983 with one correction: with
reference to Santa Fe Land Improvement Company Specific Plan, the
boundary referred to as Edinger Avenue be changed to Valencia Avenue.
Motion carried, 4-0.
PUBLIC COItC£RNS
None.
CONSE)IT CALE#DAR
1. Adoption of Amended Resolution No. 2117 - Zoning Ordinance Amendment
No. ~-~ - Non-Retail Uses
It was moved by White, seconded b~ Puckett, adoption of Resolution No.
2~17. Motion carried, 4 ayes to 0 noes.
PUBLIC ~INGS
PRE-ZONE 83-1
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Richard Pierce
Properties at the southeasterly corner of Warren Avenue and
Holt Avenue (Annexation No. 133 area)
Pre-zone from the County E-4 District to the City of Tustin
R-3 (2,820) District
lb. USE PERMIT 83-20
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Richard Pierce
Properties at the southeasterly corner of Warren Avenue and
Holt Avenue (Annexation No. 133 area)
Authorization to develop 18 townhome condominiums
Associate Planner Ed Knight presented staff's repo~ and recommendations
as contained in the report dated October 1D, 1983. The Commission
viewed a brief slide presentation.
Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. The following
persons spoke in favor of the proposals:
Richard Pierce, applicant, stated he had talked with some of the
nearby property owners about their concerns. He also stated that
authorization to build 18 units would lower the price of each unit
and make them more affordable.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 10, 1983
Page 2
Fred Anhert stated he felt the project would not cause traffic
problems on Warren Avenue.
The owner of one of the parcels proposed for development, stated the
traffic problems presently experienced on Warren Avenue were a
result of reckless drivers rather than excessive traffic.
The following persons spoke in opposition to the proposed project:
Will McNiff, Patricia Thelan, William Fox, Madge Miller, Maurice
Gilbert, Myron Nichols, John Jamieson and Dan Nitson expressed
concerns about the traffic the project would generate onto Warren
Avenue and the preservation of the character of the neighborhood.
There being no other speakers on the matter, Chairman Sharp closed the
public hearing at 8:24 p.m.
Moved by Ainslie, seconded by Puckett, to recommend Pre-Zone 83-20 as
submitted to the City Council, and approval of Use Permit 83-20 as
submitted. Commissioner White requested the motion be amended to
require a review of complete landscape plans by the Commission. The
maker of the motion and second agreed to the amendment.
Following Commission discussion regarding the appropriateness of 18
units, which would require an amendment to Specific Plan No. 6, the
motion failed; 1-3, Ainslie in favor; Puckett, Sharp, White opposed.
Moved by Puckett, seconded by White, to recommend to the City Council
adoption of a zoning designation oF R-3 (3,000) and approval of Use
Permit 83-20 as amended for 16 units, with the additional requirement of
of a review of complete landscape plans by the Commission. Motion
failed; 2-2, White, Puckett in favor; Ainslie, Sharp opposed.
Chairman Sharp expressed concern regarding traffic circulation and
Commissioner Puckett expressed a desire to see plans detailing
alternative circulation through the project.
After discussion regarding Specific Plan No. 6 and traffic circulation,
it was moved by Ainslie, approval for 17 units and an amendment to
Specific Plan No. 6. Motion failed for lack of second.
Moved by White, seconded by Ainslie, to recommend to the City Council
adoption of a zoning designation of R-3 (3,000) and approval of Use
Permit 83-20, as amended, to 16 units, and submittal of complete
landscape plans for Commission review. Motion carried, 3-1, Sharp
opposed.
2. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12018
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Richard Pierce
Properties at the southeasterly corner of Warren Avenue and
Holt Avenue (Annexation No. 133 area)
Authorize subdivision of the property for townhome purposes
Senior Planner Alan Warren presented the staff report and recommended
continuance of the hearing to the next regular meeting to give the
applicant an opportunity to revise Tentative Tract No. 12018 in
accordance with previously approved Use Permit 83-20.
Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing at 8:58 p.m.
An unidentified member of the audience asked if minutes of the
meeting would be available for public review. Chairman Sharp
responded they would.
Patricia Thelan asked for and received an explanation from Chairman
Sharp regarding the previous public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 10, 1983
Page 3
Moved by White, seconded by Puckett, to continue the public hearing to
the next regular meeting. Motion carried, 4-0.
At 9:03 p.m. Chairman Sharp called for a short recess, llne meeting
resumed at 9:12 p.m.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS:
1. Old Business
None.
2. New Business
1. Design Review - Fesco, Valencia Avenue
Research and Development Project
Senior Planner Alan Warren presented the staff report. The Commission
viewed a slide presentation of the present use of the property.
Moved by White, seconded by Puckett, to approve by Minute Order, the
preliminary site, architectural and landscape plans subject to the
following conditions:
a. That additional refuse enclosures shall be provided to staff's
satisfaction.
b. That building materials, colors and sig plans be submitted to
staff for review and approval.
c. That the easterly drive onto Valencia Avenue be redesigned to
alleviate potential conflicts with the railroad spur and
drainage structure.
Motion carried, 4-0.
STAFF CONCERNS:
1. Deparlmmnt Status Report
Report received and filed.
2. Report on Council Actions - September 19, 1983
Report received and filed.
3. Determination of Use - Private Garage
Item withdrawn by staff.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
None.
ADJOURNMENT: at 9:26 p.m. to the next regular meeting on October 24,
1983
James B. Sharp, Chairman
Janet Hester,
Recording Secretary
CONSENT CALENDAR NO. 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
I3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
RESOLUTION NO. 2119 '
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
APPROVING PRE-ZONE 83-I RECOMMENDING 14452, 14472, 14492 HOLT
AVENUE BE ZONED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-3 (3,000) UPON
ITS ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN
The Planning Cofrmaission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application, (Pre-Zone 83-1) has been filed
by Richard Pierce requesting zoning designations for property
located at 11452, 14472, 14492 Holt Avenue upon annexation to
the City of Tustin.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on
said application.
C. That R-3 (3000), Multiple-Family Residential, should be
granted for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change would be in conformance with the
Tustin Area General Plan that authorizes the development
of a multiple-family project.
2. The proposed change would be in conformance with
Specific Plan No. 6, adopted by Resolution No. 81-52, and
authorizes the development of a multiple-family project of
one unit per 3,000 square feet.
O. Development of subject property shall be in accordance
with the policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform
Building Codes as administered by the Building Official; Fire
Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal; and
street improvements requirements as administered by the City
Engineer.
E. Final development plans shall require the review and
approval of the Community Development Director.
F. A previous Negative Declaration has been adopted as a
part of Specific Plan No. 6.
II.
Planning Cofm~ission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Pre-Zone 83-1', subject to the following
condi ti ons:
28
6
7
8
9
10
'11
12
14
1,5
16
17
18
19
2O
21
23
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2119
Page 2
1. Any project within the subject site shall comply with
Specific Plan No. 6 as adopted by Resolution No. 81-52.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Coneission, City
of Tustin held on the day of , 1983.
James B. Sharp, Chairman
Janet Hester
Recording Secretary
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CONSENT CALENDAR NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2120
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 83-20 AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF
SIXTEEN RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUMS LOCATED
AT 14452, 14472, 14492 HOLT AVENUE
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application, (Use Permit 83-20), has
been filed by Richard Pierce to request authorization to
construct eighteen townhome units in one phase located
at 14452, 14472, 14492 Holt Avenue.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and
held on said application.
C. That sixteen townhome units is the maximum allowable
density according to the R-3 (3000) zone and Specific
Plan No. 6.
D. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following
findings of fact:
That establishment, maintenance, and/or operation of
the use applied for will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, or morals of the persons residing or
wor~ing in the neighborhood of such proposed use, in
that:
a. the proposed project is in conformance with both
the Tustin Zoning Ordinance No. 157, as amended, and
the Tustin Area General Plan.
b. the proposed project is in conformance with the
requirements of Specific Plan No. 6, as adopted by
Resolution No. 81-52.
c. the proposed project will provide 3,172 square
feet per unit.
d. development standards have been applied which
conform to the Specific Plan and provide for a
uniform development consistent with adjoining
developments.
e. due to its secondary arterial status, limiting
access points onto Holt Avenue would be in the
interest of traffic safety.
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No.
Page 2
II.
.2O
The establishment, maintenance and/or operation of
the use applied for will not be detrimental to the
comfort and general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use in
that the use applied for is in conformance with the
Zone Classification of R-3 (3,000) and shall be
developed in accordance with the City of Tustin's
development and zoning provisions.
The establishment, maintenance and/or operation of
the use applied for will not be injurious or
detrimental to property, improvements in the
neighborhood, or general welfare of the City in that
the project will be constructed in conformance with
1979 Uniform Building Code, as adopted by Ordinance
No. 835.
That a previous Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impact has been prepared as a part of Specific Plan
No. 6.
The proposed development shall be in accordance with
the development policies adopted by the City Council,
Uniform Building Code as administered by the Building
Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange
County Fire Marshal, and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
Final development plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission and Community
Development Department.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use
Permit No. 83-20, authorizing the construction of
sixteen townhome units in one phase, subject to the
following conditions:
The final site plan shall be standardized and
reflect all appropriate City standard drawing
numbers. The developer shall construct all missing
or damaged street improvements to said development
per the City of Tustin "Minimum Design Standards of
Public Works" and "Street Improvement Standards".
This work shall consist of, but not be limited to;
curbs and gutters, sidewalks, drive aprons and
street payment.
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for this
townhome project shall be reviewed and approved by
City staff and the City Attorney prior to the
recordation of these C.C. & R.'s. The C.C.
shall specifically prohibit the storage of
recreational vehicles within the complex. The
Resolution No 't20
Page 3.
5
6
7
8
9
10.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
5,
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ll.
12.
1_3.
C.C.& R.'s shall state that garages shall be used
primarily for the storage of vehicles and outline
enforcement procedures. The C.C. & R.'s shall
include vehicular and pedestrian access for
adjoining developments in the Specific Plan area.
All future site plans and elevations submitted for
Community Development Department review shall be
consistent with the site plan submitted for review
and approval by the Planning Commission. All
amenities shall be substantially constructed.
A landscape plan shall be required for review and
approval from the Community Development Department
and Planning Commission. The applicant shall make
every effort to preserve mature trees as an amenity
of the project.
The subject parcel shall require annexation to the
Orange County Street Lighting Maintenance District
NO. 6.
Each residential lot shall have an individual
sanitary sewer and domestic water service.
Sanitation District, Water District, New Development
taxes and parkland dedication fees are to be paid
prior to building permit issuance.
A final grading plan shall be required for review
and approval by the Community Development
Department.
A permit shall be required from the Orange County
Environmental Management Agency if any drainage is
planned to flow into the adjacent Flood Control
Channel.
Improvements on the private street shall be detailed
to ensure that they conform-to those improvements
with Tract 11586 to the south.
The adoption of Use Permit 83-20 shall be final when
Pre-Zone 83-1 is completed adopted.
A sewer and water plan shall be required for review
and approval.
The property line radius at the corner of Holt
Avenue and Warner Avenue shall be of such a radius
to acco,m,odate a 35' radius curb return.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
25
26
28
Resolution No..120
Page 4
14.
Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7
connection fees at the time a building permit is
issued, based upon $250.00. per dwelling unit and a
front footage charge.
15.
All exterior materials and colors shall be submitted
for review and approval by the Community Development
Department.
16.
All utilities serving the proposed development shall
be underground within the exterior boundary lines of
the property.
17.
A Tentative and Final Map must be submitted and
approved in compliance wth the Subdivision
Ordinance.
18.
Individual trash receptacle pick-up shall be
restricted to along the private driveway, subject to
written approval from the disposal service.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission,
City of Tustin held on the day of , 1983.
James B. Sharp, Chairman
Janet Hester
Recording Secretary
Report to the
Planning Commission
CONT. PUBLIC HEARING NO. I
OCTOBER 24, 1983
SUIL)ECT:
APPLICRNT:
LO~ATIO#:
REQUEST:
Tentative Tract No. 12018
Richard Pierce
Holt Avenue at Warren Avenue, 14452, 14472, 14492 Holt Avenue
Subdivision of a parcel of land for purposes of creating a
residential townhome project
BACKGROUND
This project was continued to the October 24, 1983 meeting in order to first
resolve the Use Permit and Zone Change issues. At the October 10, 1983 meeting,
the Planning Commission approved Zone Change 83-1 for R-3 (3,000) and approved
Use Permit 83-20 for sixteen townhomes.
DISCUSSION
The Zone Change will be considered by the City Council on November 7, 1983.
addition, the City Council appealed Use Permit 83-20. The appeal is also
scheduled for the November 7, 1983 meeting.
In
The applicant's original submittal was for a subdivision of eighteen lots. The
applicant has not submitted a revised Tentative Tract and is requesting a ·
continuance until the Zone Change and Use Permit can be considered by the City
Council.
Since staff does not have a revised Tentative Tract to submit for Planning
Commission consideration and the applicant is requesting a continuance, staff is
recommending that the public hearing for Tentative Tract Map No. 12018 be
continued to November 14, 1983.
RECOI~4ENDATION
It is recommended that the public hearing for Tentative Tract Map No. 12018 be
further continued to the November 14, 1983 meeting.
Associate Planner
Community Development Department
Report
Planning
OCTOBER 24, 1983
SUBdECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
to the
Commission
ZONE DESIGNATION: Multiple-Family Residential
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically Exempt
REQUEST:
PUBLIC HEARING NO. I
Variance 83-8
Systems Engineering & Construction Company
545 "B" Street
(R-3)
Authorization to develop a five (5) unit apartment complex on a
multiple-family lot of substandard width.
BACKGROUND
A request has been submitted on behalf of Walter Fredericksen to contruct an
apartment house on a 50' wide multiple-family residential parcel. The Zoning
Code requires at least 70' of lot frontage for an R-3 development. The land is
located in one of the older sections of the City and was undoubtedly subdivided
prior to enactment of zoning classification provisions. At 7,500 square feet
the parcel does satisfy minimum lot area standards.
After a preliminary review and public notification of the variance request,
staff discovered that the relatively new height restriction for R-3 developments
affects this project. Since this aspect of the proposal was not included in the
public notice, it would be inappropriate to review this proposal until it has
been re-advertised.
Staff will reschedule the hearing for the November 14, 1983 meeting and send
proper notification to the affected property owners.
Senior Planner
AW:ih
Community Development Department
Report to the
Planning
Commission
OCTOBER 24, 1983
SUB,IECT: Use Permit 83-2~
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
GENERAL PLRll AND ZOIIE OESIGNATION:
PUBLIC HEARING NO. 2
Robert Ridgway
185 Myrtle Avenue
Authorization to construct a guest house without kitchen facilities
Single-Family Residential
BACKGROUND
Section g223b3 of the Tustin City Code provides that upon approval of a
conditional use permit, an accessory structure to be used as a guest house may
be constructed on a lot in the Single-Family Residential (R-l) Distict.
The code further stipulates that the guest house may not contain any cooking
facilities.
An application has been submitted by Mr. Robert Ridgway requesting authorization
to replace an existing guest room with a new structure. Additionally, while not
a required part of the application, the applicant has shown a new garage area he
intends to construct in conjunction with the guest house. A similar request was
granted by the Planning Agency on May 3, 1982 for the property at 165 N. "B"
Street.
SITE ANALYSIS
The 11,700 square foot lot currently contains a single-family dwelling with
detached garage. Connected to the garage is a structure that is being used as a
living area for the applicant's son. The applicant indicates that the garage is
approximately 45 years old. The Building Department has no records for the
property, so the actual age of the structure cannot be determined. The present
use of the guest room is considered to be an existing non-conforming use,
therefore the need for a use permit for the new guest house.
The proposal submitted meets all code requirements and deviates from the
development standards only in that the driveway is 10 feet wide in lieu of the
20 foot standard. The primary reason for the 20' width is for emergency fire
access. However, the Fire Department has indicated that with the installation
of a domestic fire sprinkler system in the new structures, the 20 foot drive
aisle would not be required.
Community Development Department
Use Permit 83-21
October 24, 1983
Page 2
To accommodate on-site parking, the plan shows enough garage space for three
cars as well as additional garage area to be used for the storage of a boat.
DISCUSSION
As was mentioned above, a similar, request for a guest house was approved by the
Planning Agency. Staff has the same concerns with this project as were present
in the previous action. For example, the potential use of the new house for
rental property. Therefore, many of the conditions required of the "B" Street
Use Permit should be included with any approval for the subject project.
Another condition that should be imposed is that prior to the final building
inspection and release of utilities for the new structure, the existing garage
and guest room must be demolished.
RECOI~NOATION
It is recommended that Use Permit 83-21 by approved be the adoption of
Resolution No. 2118, including the following conditions:
1. That the new structures shall be equipped with a domestic fire sprinkler
system as required by the Orange County Fire Department.
2. No kitchen or cooking facilities shall be permitted in the new structure.
3. The living area of the new structures shall be used only by family members or
guests of the property owner and not be used as a rental or leased unit.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, a copy of a recorded deed
restriction prohibiting kitchen facilities and the use of the structure as a
rental or lease unit must be on file with the Community Development
Department.
Prior to the final inspections and release of utilities for the new
structures, the existing garage and guest room shall be demolished, the new
structure shall be served by the utility meters currently serving the
existing single-family dwelling on the site.
6. Developer will be responsible for the construction of any missing or damaged
street improvements which shall include, but not limited to, the following:
a. curb and gutter
b. sidewalk
c. drive apron
e. street lights with underground conduits
Use Permit 83-21
October 24, 1983
Page 2
7. A grading plan shall be submitted for review and approval by Community
Development and Engineering Departments.
Assistant P1 anner
JSD:jh
Attachments:
Resolution No. 2118
Letter from Applicant - September 19, 1983
Site Plan/Elevations
Development Review Summary
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2118
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 83-21 TO AUTHORIZE THE CONSTRUCTION
AND USE OF A GUEST HOUSE AT 185 MYRTLE AVENUE
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application, (Use Permit 83-21), has
been filed by Robert Ridgway to request authorization to
allow a guest house of 800 square feet (plus garage
area) without kitchen facilities, on property at 185
Myrtle Avenue.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and
held on said application.
C. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following
findings of fact:
That establishment, maintenance, and/or operation of
the use applied for will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, or morals of the persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, in
that:
a. the use applied for is in conformance with both
the Tustin Zoning Code and the Tustin Area General
Plan.
b. the size of the lot (11,700 square feet) provides
a large area for development while maintaining a
substantial area for open space.
c. the guest house cannot be used as a rental or
leasing unit
d. no kitchen facilities shall be installed.
The establishment, maintenance and/or operation of
the use applied for will not be detrimental to the
comfort and general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use in
that the activity is proposed for the correct land
use and zoning classification and shall be developed
in a manner prescribed by the City's development and
zoning provisions.
The establishment, maintenance and/or operation of
the use applied for will not be injurious or
detrimental to property, improvements in the
neighborhood, or general welfare of the City in that
the project will be constructed in conformance with
1979 Uniform Building Code, as adopted by Ordinance
No. 835.
Resolution No. 7118
Page 2
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
II.
That this project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act.
The proposed development shall be in accordance with
the development policies adopted by the City Council,
Uniform Building Code as administered by the Building
Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange
County Fire Marshal, and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
Final development plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission and Community
Development Department.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use
Permit No. 83-21, subject to the following conditions:
That the new structures shall be equipped with a
domestic fire sprinkler system as required by the
Orange County Fire Department.
2. No kitchen or cooking facilities shall be permitted
in the new structure.
The living area of the new structure shall be used
only by family members and guests of the property
owner and not be used as a rental or for lease unit.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, a copy of
a recorded deed restriction prohibiting kitchen
facilities and the use of the structure as a rental
or leased unit must be on file with the Community
Development Department.
Prior to final inspections and release of utilities
for the new buildings, the existing garage and guest
room shall be demolished. The new structure shall be
served by the utility meters currently serving the
existing single-family dwelling on the site.
Developer will be responsible for the construction of
any missing or damage street improvements which shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. curb and gutter
b. sidewalk
c. drive apron
d. street trees
e. street lights with underground conduit
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19'
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Reso]ution No. 2118
Page 3
7. A grading plan shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Community Development and Engineering
Departments.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission,
City of Tustin held on the day of , 1983.
James B. Sharp, Chairman
Janet Hester
Recording Secretary
City of Tustin Planning Commission
Subject: Proposed development at 185 Myrtle St.
Gentlemen:
I am the owner of a two bedroom house at the subject address. I bought
the property nine years ago and have lived there ever since. It has a
detached two car garage with a room attached to the back of the garage.
The house and garage are approximately 45 years old. The room appears
to be at least 30 years old. My 22 year old son moved in with me four
years ago, and he lives in the room behind the garage. The lot size is
50']{234', which is a little over ¼ acre.
I have an 18' boat, a pickup truck with a camper, and a car. My son also
has a car. The only place I have to park my boat is in the driveway in
front of the garage. This blocks vehicular access to the garage, so other
vehicles must be parked in the driveway and on the street.
I am proposing to build a large L-shaped building near the rear of my
property and to remove the existing garage and room where my son lives,
as shown on plans submitted with this letter. The east end of the build-
ing will be a garage to store the boat, truck, and camper. It will have
a 10' high door opening to allow clearance for the boat and for a camper.
It will also have a 9' wide "boat" door on the back, for access to the
rear yard. The north side of the building will be a one bedroom guest
house without a kitchen for my son, and an additional garage for the
rest of our vehicles. I would like to build the new building, have my
son move in, then demolish the existing garage and room.
The finished construction will allow all vehicles to be parked off the
street, and will provide larger housing for my son that is up to current
building codes. There should not be a negative impact to the neighborhood
since I'm only bettering existing conditions. The property is zoned for
my proposed construction, subject to issuance of a Use Permit for the
guest house.
Yours truly,
185 Myrtle St,
Tustin, Ca. 92680
..?
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
Project:
Location/District:
Action:
Use Permit 83-21
185 Myrtle Avenue/Single-Family Residential (R-I)
Requesting authorization for the construction of a
guest house without kitchen facilities
District Requirement
Building:
Front Setback
Side Setback
Rear Setback
Gross Square Footage
Net Floor Square Footage
Height
Number of Stories
Materials/Colors
Lot Size
Lot Coverage
Parking:
Number of Spaces
Ratio (space/square footage)
Percent of Compact Spaces
Type
Uses:
Proposed
50' 142'
5' 5'
5' 20'
800 guest house
* 1,240 garage
* N/A
20' Max. 15'11"
* 1
8,300 sq. ft.
* rear yard
Maximum 30% of rear 25% of rear
yard yard
2 3
2/s-f dwelling
2/single-family dw. 1/garage
* 0
Garage Garage
Single-Family Dwelling
Guest House Permitted Guest House
Number of Public Notifications (Owners):
Environmental Status
* No Standard
*
Categorically exempt
54
Report
Planning
' to the
Commission
NEW BUSINESS NO. i
OCTOBER 24, 1983
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Study Session Concerning Multiple-Residential
Development Standards
DISCUSSION
Following submittal and review of two residential condominium projects, the
Planning Commission and City Council expressed concern regarding the inadequate
and inappropriate development standards applied in the multiple-residential zone
districts. Rather than continue to approve projects with excessively high
density and inadequate provisions for off-street parking, the Council directed
the Planning Commission to study multiple-residential development standards and
forward their recommendations.
The two areas of greatest concern are development densities and provisions for
off-street parking. The R-3 zone district allows a development density of up to
34.85 units per acre. Within the urbanized areas of Tustin, the Council
generally considers approximately 20 units per acre to be more suitable
density. In the 20-unit range, projects can provide adequate off-street
parking, recreational amenities such as a swimming pool and open space area.
The Planning Commission was more specifically concerned with inadequacies in
parking regulations. The Planned Development (PD) District which regulates
development of condominiums and townhomes only requires two spaces per unit
without consideration for guest parking.
In addition to density and parking, staff suggests the Planning Commission
study open space requirements. The City presently requires 50% open space
excluding driveways and covered patios. This restriction unfortunately
encourages strip landscaping which is useless for recreational purposes. Rather
than a percentage of open space, a square footage of common, useful recreational
area per unit might better meet the intent of the Planned Development Distrct.
The purpose of this study session is to allow an informal discussion prior to
drafting a proposed ordinance. Staff will submit specific ideas and be prepared
to discuss their impact.
A concern of staff is that of methodology to reduce development densities for
multiple-residential zones while also acknowledging existing zone densities and
authorizing current densities with specific findings for reconstruction due to
catastrophic accidents.
Community Development Department
Multiple-Residential Development Standards
October 24, 1983
Page 2
Should the Commission desirl additional sessions to discuss this subject, such
meetings would not impact any major new projects on file with the department.
R£COI~NDATION
Following study session discussion, instruct staff to initiate proceedings and
advertise to amend various sections of the multiple-residential districts.
Director of Community Development
Attachments:
1. Staff report dated September 6, 1983
2. Zone District CompaFison Chart
3. Suggested Development Standards
DATE:
TO:
F ROH:
S UBJ ECT:
September 6, 1983
ATTACHMENT #1
! nter - C'om
Honorable/Mayor & City Council Members
Community Development Department
Analysis of Multiple Residential Development Standards
BAC~$ROU~B
During recent hearings concerning development of condominiums on Sycamore
Avenue, the City Council. expressed displeasure with the maximum allowable
density in the R-3 District. At present, the R-3 District permits one unit
per 1,250 square feet of land, which equals 34.85 units per acre. Staff
agrees with Council that a maximin multiple-family density of approximately
20 units per acre would be more appropriate within the urbanized areas of
Tustin.
Secondly, Council requested a map indicating vacant parcels and potentially
developable parcels in the R-3 District. The attached map indicates known
vacant residential lots and areas considered potentially developable to
higher densities. At present, only one vacant site exists ~ich is the
Sycamore site mentioned above.
While comprehensive revision of the Zoning Code is a planned priority
project this year, immediate amendments to appropriate sections are
necessary. In particular, the R-3 District, which duplicated the County's
R-3 standards for property annexed into the City, should not necessarily be
used to regulate new construction. Therefore, amending the R-3 development
density should be initiated at this time.
In addition to Council's concerns regarding density, the Planning
Commission requests Council to also consider amending the minimum
off-street parking requirements for multiple residential. At present, the
City does not require any guest parking, but merely two resident spaces per
unit, one covered and the other open. While this standard may be suitable
for small, infill projects with available on-street parking, large
condominium projects will not be provided adequate guest parking. As
further recycling of properties to higher densities continues, greater
on-street parking will be a certain by-product.
Analysis of Multiple Residential Development Standards
August 30, 1983
Page 2
RECOIINENDATION
Authorize staff to initiate proceedings and advertise a publfc hearing
before the Planning Commission to consider amending the R-3 District
development density and minimum off-street parking requirements for the
following multiple residential zones:
Planned Development District (PO)
Duplex Residential District (R-2)
Multiple Family Residential (R-3)
Suburban Residential District (R-4)
Staff will prepare specific recommendations for Commission consideration
following an analysis of our City's parking needs and surveys of comparable
City parking standards. Copies of staff's reports will be forwarded to the
Council in addition to the Planning Commission's recommended ordinance
changes.
Director of Community Development
DDL:jh
Attachment: City Map
ATTACHMENT #2
ZONE DISTRICT COMPARISON CHART
Present Development Standards
Parking Minimum
Zone Density Spaces per Unit Open Space
P-D No maximum i covered 50% of lot
(Determined 1 open area
Condominiums/ by 50% open
Townhomes space 2 total
R-2 12.45 UPA i Garage 50%
1 Your Choice
Dupl exes 2 total
R-3
Apartments
34.81 UPA 2 your choice 25%
R-4 14.52 UPA 1 covered No
1 open requiremnt
2 total
Zone
P-D
Condominiums/
Townhomes
SUGGESTED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
For Discussion
Density.
(No change)
Determined
by open space
Parking Assigned
Bachelor - 1 garage
1Bedrm 1 garage
2 Bedrm 2 garages
3 Bedrm 2 garages
1 open
Guest Parking
One open space per
four dwelling units
ATTACHMENT #3
Minimum
Open Space
400 sq. ft. per
unit (within a
common
recreation area
R-2
Dupl exes
(No change)
12.45 UPA
Parking Assigned
Bachelor - i garage
i Bedrm - 1 garage
2 Bedm - 2 garages
3 Bedrm 2 garages
1 open
Guest Parking
One open space per
four dwelling units
R-3 (1750)
Apartments
24.89 UPA
Parking Assigned
Bachelor - 1 carport
1BedY~ - 1 carport
2 Bedrm - 2 carports
3 BedY~ - 2 carports
1 open
Guest Parking
One open space per
four dwelling units
200 sq.ft, per
unit (within a
common
recreation
area
(No change)
1.4.52 UPA
Parking Assigned
Bachelor - 1 carport
i Bedm - 1 carport
2 Bedrm - 2 carports
3 Bedm - 2 carports
1 open
Guest Parking
One open space pet
four dwelling units
Departmental
Status Report
October 24, 1983
OEPARTMENTAL PROJECT STATUS - WE£K OF OCTOBER 17, 1983
STAFF CONCERNS NO. i
This report is intended to inform the Council and Commission of Community
Development Department projects and their processing or construction status.
Should any member of the Council or Commission desire further information,
please contact me at your convenience.
Permits have been issued for the Marshall's stockroom addition at 630 E1
Camino Real.
2. Permits have been issued for the McDonald's playland at 245 West First
Street.
A grading permit was issued to 14682 Holt Avenue for five townhome units (Jim
Manning). Construction permits are ready to be issued to the contractor.
Preliminary plans have been submitted for design review of a "space saver"
mini-warehouse project at the northwesterly corner of Red Hill Avenue and
Edinger Avenue.
5. A use permit application has been submitted by B'Nai Israel to relocate to a
building at 655 S. "B" Street.
Director of Community Devel opment
AGW:jh
Community Development Department
Report to the ~~
Planning
OCTOBER 24, 1983
SUBdECT:
Commission
Report on Council Actions - October 17, 1983
STAFF CONCERNS NO. 2
Oral presentation to be given by Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community
Development.
/jh
Attachments:
City Council Action Agenda - October 17, 1983
Planning Commission Action Agenda - October 10, 1983
Community Development Department
:05 I.
ALL PRESENT I I.
EXCEPT ~EIMKE
III.
ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR I~'ETI#G
TUSTIN CIl~ COUNCIL
October !7, 1~
7:00 P .M.
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL C~LL
PUBLIC CONCERNS
IV. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
BUDGET RESOLUTION TO BE
PREPARED FOR NOVERBER 7, 1983
RESOLUTION TO BE 2.
PREPARED FOR NOVE~ER 7, 1983
REVISE OROlNAMCE NO. 8~ 3.
ACCORDI~ TO STAFF'S
RE~NDATION
APPROVED
APPROVED
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
NO. 83-79
APPROVED STAFF
RECO)~XDATION
APPROVED STAFF'
REC~NDATION
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
NO. 83-69
~JlTY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
APPROVAL OF 1983-84 BUDGET
REVENUE SHARING FUNDS
ORDINANCE NO. 896 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City
of Tustin, California, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE TUSTIN
CITY CODE, ESTABLISHING THE REQUIREMENT FOR A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND USE CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS DESIGNED FOR
NON-RETAIL USES IN C-1, C-2, C-G, M AND PC-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Continue to next meeting for revision of Ordinance as
recommended by the Community Development Director.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 5, 1983
2.
e
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $101,619.03
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $954,977.13
RESOLUTION NO. 83-79 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES FOR
CITY FACILITY RENTALS AND PERMITS
Adoption of Resolution No. 83-79 which implements the fees
approved September 19, 1983, by the Council.
REQUEST FOR PARKWAY TREE REMOVAL
Approve the removal of 3 large Pine trees at 13752 Malena.
Drive and that only 2 of the 3 trees be replaced with 15
gallon size Carrotwood trees as recommended by the
Maintenance Superintendent.
REQUEST TO REFILL BUILDING INSPECTOR VACANCY
Authorize staff to begin recruitment proceedings to refill
the vacant building inspector position in accordance with the
adopted salary schedule as recommended by the Community
Development Director.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-69 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT
FUNDS UNDER THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG URBAN OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
PROGRAM
Adoption of Resolution No. 83-69 as recommended by the
Recreation Superintendent.
Page 1 10-17-83
APP~VED 5'I'AFF
RECO~#DATION
ADOPTE~ R~SOLUT~ON
HO. 83-81 A#D APPROVED
STAFF R~CO~E)JDAT]O#
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
NO. 83-80
ADOPTED R~SOLUTIO~
NO. 83-80
* 8.
10.
REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED POLICE UNIT (MOTORCYCLE)
Authorize an appropriation from the Equipment/Vehicle fund in
the amount of $5,330.00 for the replacement of a Police
Department motorc~le as recommended by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-81 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING
RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (FY 82-83 Handicapped Ramp
Construction Program)
Adoption of Resolution No. 83-81 and if no claims or stop
pa)merit notices are filed within 30 days, authorize payment
of the final i0% retention amount of $2,693.g2 as recommended
by the Engineering Department.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-80 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, AUTHORIZING A WORKER'S COMPENSATION
BENEFIT PAYMENT ACCOUNT AND PROVIDING PROCEDURES THEREFOR
Adoption of Resolution No. 83-80 as recommended by the
Finance Director.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-82 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE SPECIAL
MAIL BALLOT ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1983,
FOR REORGANIZATION No. 53, TO BE ~tADE BY THE CITY CLERK
Adoption of Resolution No. 83-82 as recommended by the City
· Clerk.
VI. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None
ADOPTED OI~IHA#CE NO. 895
VII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
ORDINANCE NO. 895 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City
of Tustin, Califor,ia, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE REGARDING
BINGO PERMITS FOR LICENSEES WHICH MOVE TO A NEW LOCATION
M. O. - That Ordinance No. 895 have second reading by title
only.
M. O. - That Ordinance No. 895 be passed and adopted.
(Roll Cal 1 Vote)
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
APPROPRIATE/) $10,0(0) FOR 1. SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON FRONTIER PARK
NEW EQUIP~I~T Pleasure of the Council.
AGEIiDIZE FOR NOV194BER 7, 2. SMOKE DETECTOR COMPLIANCE
191L~, FOR CL~J~IFICATIO# OF IU~PORT Receive and file.
IX.
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~ENDATIO#
NEW BUSINESS
REQUEST FOR PARKING PROHIBITION - EL CAMINO REAL
Authorize the removal of on-street parking by red zoning of
the curb adjacent to 705 E1 Camtno Real as recommended by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
Page 2 10-17-83
X '. REPORTS
APPF. JU_ USE PERMIT NO. 83-20
WARREN AND HOLT)
NO FURTHER REPORT
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - October 10, 1983
All actions of the Planning Commission are final unless
appealed by the City Council.
2. BULLET TRAIN
An oral report will be given by the City Manager.
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
STAFF TO CHECIC ON RED CURBING AND 'NO PARKING' SIGN ON 'B' STREET AT FIRST STREET.
ADOPTED UP. DINANCE NO. 890 - AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY OF llJSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
PROHIBITING HOTEL AND NOTEL USES IN THE C-I OISTRICT EXCEPT UPON ISSUANCE OF A CUNDITIOMAL liSlE
PERMIT
7:59
XII. ADJOURNMENT - To the next regular meeting on November 7, 1983.
ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR IEETING
OF THE TUSTIN REDEYELOP~ENT AGENCY
October 17, 1983
7:00 P.M.
7:59
1. CALL TO ORDER
ALL PRESENT 2.
EXCEPT GREINKE
PPROVED 3.
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 5, 1983
APPROVED
4. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $667,872.24.
EDGAR REQUESTED 5. OTHER BUSINESS
MORE DETAILS FOR THE NOVEMBER 1, 1983, WORKSHOP ON 82-83 EXPENOITHRES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS:
WHICH PROJECTS WERE PAID FOR LAST YEAR, LEADING TO THE BALANCE THAT PRESENTLY EXISTS, THEN THE
CASH Fl_OW ll~T EXISTS FOR THE COMING YEAR AND THE DETAILS ll~T LEAD UP TO THE CASH BALANCES IN
BOll( THE DEBT SERVICE FUND AND THE C~b°IT~ PROJECT FUND
HOESTEREY EXPLAINED THAT THE WORKSHOP WAS CALLED REGARDING POLICIES AND FUTURE PROJECTS RATHER
THAN FOR A BUDGETARY UEARING.
8:02 6. ADJOURNMENT - To a Redevelopment Agency Workshop on November 1, 1983, at
7:00 p.m. and thence to the next Regular Meeting on
November 7, 1983.
CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT ACTION AGENDA Page 3 10-17-83
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING
October 10, 1983 7:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
7:35 P.M., CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
AINSLIE, PUCKEI'F, WItITE, StlARP
WElL ABSENT
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
FOR MEETING HELD September 26, 1983
Approved with correction as noted by Cmmmissioner White.
PUBLIC CONCERNS
(limited to 3 minutes per person for
items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION
ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS
LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO,
PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS
FOR THE RECORD
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT
CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL
BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE
NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS
PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE
MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION,
STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS
TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.
1. Adoption of Amended Resolution No. 2117
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 83-2 - Non-Retail Uses
Approved 4-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
la. PRE-ZONE 83-1
Applicant: Richard Pierce
Location: Properties at the southeasterly corner of Warren Avenue and Holt
Avenue (Annexation No. 133 area)
Request: Pre-zone from the County E-4 District to the City of Tustin
R-3 (2,820) District.
lb. USE PERMIT 83-20
Applicant: Richard Pierce
Location: Properties at the southeasterly corner of Warren Avenue and Holt
Avenue (Annexation No. 133 area)
Request: Authorization to develop'18 townhome condominiums
Planning Commission Action Agenda
October 10, 1983
Page 2
Pre-Zone 83-1 - Approved 3-1, Sharp opposed, to recommend to the City Council
adoption of a zoning designation of R-3 (3000).
Use Permit 83-20 - Approved 3-1, Sharp opposed, approval of Use Permit 83-20,
as amended to approve sixteen dwelling units and require Commission review of
site and landscape plans.
2. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12018
Applicant: Richard Pierce
Location: Properties at the southeasterly corner of Warren Avenue and Holt
Avenue (Annexation No. 133 area)
Request: Authorize subdivision of the property for townhome purposes
Motion to continue to next regular meeting on October 24, 1983 carried, 4-0.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS:
1. Old Business
None.
2. New Business
1. Design Review - Fesco, Valencia Avenue
Research and Development Project
Approval, 4-0, of the preltmtnry site, architectural, and landscape plans
subject to the following conditions:
a. That additional refuse enclosures be provided to staff's
satt sfactl on;
b. That building materials/colors and sign plans shall be submitted to
staff for review and approval;
c. That the easterly drive onto Valencia be redesigned to alleviate
potential conflicts with the railroad spur and drainage structure.
1. Departmental Status Report
Report received and filed.
2. Report on Council Actions - September 19, 1983
Report received and filed.
3. Determination of Use - Private Garage
Item withdrawn by staff.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
None.
ADJOURNMENT: At 9:26 p.m. to next regular meeting on October 24, 1983
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 1983 Inter-Com
TO:
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM:
SUBJECT:
BOB LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY
ENGINEER
GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR C.A.T.V. AND EDISON FACILITIES
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Tustin City Council, at their meeting of November 7, 1983 authorize the
Mayor to execute grant of easement deeds for areas within Centennial Park for
Cabletelevision and power source uses.
BACKGROUND:
As a result of the Cabletelevision installations in the Tusttn Meadows areas, and
the attemp to locate as many pedestals within green belt areas, easements are
required to both CommuniCom and the Southern California Edison Co. within two
areas of Centennial Park.
DISCUSSION:
Two areas within Centennial Park require easements to complete Cabletelevision
installations within that area. Each of these easements would be approximately
four (4) feet wide by twenty eight (28) feet in width and would be non-exclusive
easements.
These easements would provide for the Cabletelevision power supply units and
Southern California Edison Company conduits for the power source. The requested
easements are also shown on the attached vicinity map.
The grant of easement deeds are in the process of being prepared and Should be
available for execution within the next two to three days.
Bob Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
bh