Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 05-02-83MINIFTES OF A RESULAR ~ETING OF TIlE llJSTIN CIl~f COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way April 18, 1983 I. CALL TO ORDER/ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ I NVO~ATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hoesterey at 7:01 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, and the Invo- cation was given by Councilman Edgar. I I. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Donald J. Saltarelli Frank H. Greinke William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works R. Kenneth Fleagle, Acting Com. Dev. Dir. Royleen White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Serv. Isabelle McClements, Senior Citizens Leader Approximately 25 in the audience III. PROC- LA)IATIONS 1. OLDER ANERICANS MONTH - MAY, 1983 Mayor Hoesterey read and presented a proclamation designating the month of May, 1983, as "Older Americans Month" to Isabelle McClements, Senior Citizens Leader, City of Tustin. Mrs. McClements thanked the Council and introduced AARP Chapter President Peter Mau, TLC Program Site Manager Nick Ogden, Tustin Senior Citizens Club President Trudy VanDordrecht, and Ken Hoesterey. ~ 2. I_AW ~Y U.S.A. - MAY 1, 1983 A proclamation was read and presented to Don Ruston, Orange County Bar Association representative, by Mayor Hoesterey desig- nating May 1, 1983, as "Law Day U.S.A." Mr. Ruston expressed thanks to the Council on behalf of the Orange County Bar Asso- ciation. 8~ IV. PUBLIC CONCERNS None. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. ZONE C~ANGE 83-1 & ORDINANCE NO. 886 The Acting Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated April 18, 1983, prepared by the Community Development Depart- ment. The Mayor opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. There being no speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 886 have first reading by title only. Following reading of the title of Ordinance No. 886 by the City Clerk, it was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 886 be intro- duced as follows: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 4-18-83 VI. ~N~NT ORDINANCE NO. 886 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1031-1053 ANDREWS STREET; 1032-1034 ANDREWS STREET; 1021, 1033 SAN JUAN FROM MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R2 & R4) TO CO~IER- CIAL GENERAL-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CG-PUD) DISTRICT Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 110 2. ZONE CHANGE 83-2 & ORDINANCE NO. 887 The Acting Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated April 18, 1983, prepared by the Community Development Depart- ment. The Mayor opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. person requested information on the matter, to Hoesterey responded: The fol 1 Dwi ng which Mayor Richard Knowles, 1291Arloura Way. There being no other speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed at 7:17 p.m. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 887 have first reading by title only. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. Following reading of the title of Ordinance No. 887 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 887 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 887 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1252 IRVINE BOULEVARD (AND ADJACENT UNDEVELOPED PARCEL) FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-l) DISTRICT TO PLANNED COMMUNII~f PROFESSIONAL (PC-PR) DISTRICT Motion carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 110 Item 4 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Edgar. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the remainder o~ Consent Calendar. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 1. APPROVAL OF MINIITES - April 4, 1983 2. I~TIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $101,957.59 APPROYAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $621,871.51 DENIAL OF CLAIM OF MORGAN WARD LONG; DATE OF LOSS: FILED WITH CITY: 3-9-83; CLAIM NO. 83-7 Deny claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 1-7-83; DATE 4O RESOLUTION NO. 83-32 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Flooring at Clifton C. Miller Community Center - Harlow Carpets, Inc.) Adopt Resolution No. 83-32 and assuming no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion, authorize payment of the final 10% retention amount as recommended by the Engi- neering Department. 39 Consent Calendar Item No. 4 - Moulton Parkway/Irvine Center Drive Realignment - In response to Councilman Edgar, the Director of Public Works provided a tentative project timetable. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to: Adopt the following resolution; and CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 4-18-83 RESOL~IOH NO. 83-33 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MOULTON PARKWAY/IRVINE CENTER DRIVE AND MYFORD ROAD FAU PROJECT M-M032(O04) 2) VII. OP, DI- N~CES FOR IN~ODUCTION I. Authorize the advertisement of bids subject to Caltrans and F.H.W.A. approval of project and authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to set the date and time for bids to be opened, also subject to Caltrans and F.H.W.A. approval as recommended by the Director of Public Works in his inter-com dated April 13, 1983. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 95 LINITED TII~ PARKING & ORDINANCE NO. 885 The Chief of Police presented the staff report and recommenda- tion. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordi- nance No. 885 have first reading by title only. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. Following reading of the title of Ordinance No. 885 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 885 be introduced as follows: OPJ)INAN~E NO. 88~ - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AblENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE TO LIMITED TIME PARKING Motion carried 4-0, Greinke absent. VIII. ORDINJUICES FOR ADOPTION - None 75 IX. OLD BUSINESS - None X. NEW BUSINESS 1. BID AWARD - EXTERIOR PAINTING OF CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX Bids for subject project were opened on March 31, 1983, and received as follows: Yang H. Kim Painting, Santa Ana Reza, Inc., Buena Park Jack Lewis and Dixon Painting, Sun City Cal-Pac Painting, Mira Loma $15,000.00 $15,650.00 $18,700.00 $19,600.00 Funds in the amount of $19,000.00 are budgeted in Fiscal Year 1982-83 for subject project. As recommended in the inter-com dated April 11, 1983, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to award the con- tract for the exterior painting of the Civic Center Complex to Yang H. Klm for the bid price of $15,000.00. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 39 AUTHORIZATION l~) ISSUE PURCIqASE ORDER FOR FUI~NISHING OF 96' REINFORCEO CONCREllE STORM DRAIN PIPE FOR MOULTON PARKWAY FAU PRO~ECT M-M032 (004) Bids for subject item were opened on April 12, 1983, and received as follows: Hydro Conduit Corporation, Corona Ampac, Inc., Upland United Concrete Pipe, Baldwin Park $13,790.26 $18,145.08 $20,199.24 The low bid is 17.4% below the Engineer's estimate of $16,700.00. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 4-18-83 XI. REPORTS 1. Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-corn dated April 12, 1983, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize staff, subject to project approval by Caltrans/F.H.W.A., to issue a purchase order to Hj~ro Conduit Corporation, Corona, in the amount of $13,790.26 for the purchase of 114 lineal feet of 96" reinforced concrete pipe. Motion carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 91 3. SIG# (;ODE EXC£PTIO# - BAJ~# RESTAURA#T (14982 Red Hill Avenue) e As recommended in the inter-corn dated April 18, 1983, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by Salta- relli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize display of a SD-square foot wall-mounted reader board sign for the Barn Restaurant at the corner of Redhill Avenue and Moulton Parkway (14982 Redhill Avenue) subject to the following conditions: 1) Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. The sign shall not contain exposed globe light bulbs as was requested; and The lighting intensity shall be modified to bring the output ihto conformance with sign code limitations. PLANNING CO~ISSIO# ACTIONS Councilman Edgar expressed his concern on Old Business Item 2 - Parking Lot Review of Tustin Heights Shopping Center - on the April 11, 1983, Planning Commission Action Agenda, stating he felt the Planning Commission materi~l he reviewed was inade- quate. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to appeal and agendize the parking lot issue and sign height issue in the Tustin Heights Shopping center for a public hearing, at staff's convenience. Staff/Council discussion followed. The motion carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 81 The remainder of the Planning Commission Action Agenda of April 11, 1983, was received and filed by unanimous informal consent. 80 1983 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGILAM (S.T.I.P.) PROJECT SUBMITTALS (INFORMATION REPORT) Councilman Edgar stated he has studied these plans very care- fully and was disturbed that they do not show Myford Road as a significantly better interchange, in terms of traffic movement, than Jamboree Road. The Director of Public Works clarified that these project submittals strictly pertain to the Santa Aha Free- way interchange properties. He added that both Myford and Jamboree are presently on the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways as major highways, and suggested that once the area has been totally reviewed through the traffic study to be conducted with the 2,000-acre Irvine Land study (once the need has been established), that Council can then determine exactly what size roadway is required, whether it be four lanes, six lanes, or two lanes. In response to Councilman Edgar's concern that the City be aware of the plan in terms of traffic movement, the Director of Public Works stated tha% this program is for 1983, which runs from 1983 to 1988, and any projects submitted by the Orange County Trans- portation Commission would probably not even commence or have funding for preliminary engineering until 1986-87. The Director continued that any specific plans for Myford will come to the City for review; that the City will be an element of approval for the plan; that the traffic study should be completed within a year which will provide solid background for any proposed modifications; and there will probably not be any action on any of the projects for at least two or three years. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 4-18-83 Mayor Pro Tom Kennedy noted that Browning was submitted as a higher priority, and Jamboree as a debatable point. The Direc- tor of Public Works reported that the present order of projects is how they fell out with all other projects within the County. At any time if the Council desires not to proceed with any project, it can be pulled. However, the Director recommended against doing so until there is a complete study. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy's concern on displacement within the Jamboree Road residential community, the Director clarified that there would be no residential displacement with the Jamboree Road interchange. The right-of-way for both Jamboree Road and the interchange area southerly of the freeway was reserved for a full four-movement interchange when the Laurelwood Townhome development was initiated and with the industrial development to the east. This was a condition of improvement for both developments at the City's request. The Jamboree Road proposal is for a partial interchange with only two movements. The best time to get the community involved would be once the City is certain its projects are on a State priority list (they may not even be in the 1988 timeframe) and once there is a date certain for same. Mayor Hoesterey expressed concern that a receive and file action might imply Council approval of these plans. Councilman Salta- relli reminded Councilmembers that when this matter was under debate several years ago, the Laurelwood people spoke against a full interchange. Consequently, Council requested staff to direct that plans on Jamboree bring in a very scaled down ver- sion of getting the industrial traffic off of Walnut, so people could get on and off the freeway and not have to go past the residents, which is what this plan does. The Director of Public Works stated that each of the three projects would help disperse some of the traffic off of the Redhill connection from the interchange southerly on Redhill, and would help keep some of the traffic down on Walnut Avenue which is a big concern to residents that back up to same. In response to Mayor Hoesterey, the Director of Public Works reiterated that the reason Jamboree is shown going through to Moulton Parkway is because that is how the Master Plan of Arterial Highways within the County exists today. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy questioned why the report on Jamboree shows Redhill serving as a major overflow rather than Myford. The Director of Public Works thought it might be that with full development of properties north of the freeway in both Tustin and Irvine, ultimate development of Myford as a six-lane highway is going to be at full capacity, much as Redhill is today. Myford Road will probably be the most desirable road to travel because it will ultimately go south into Newport Beach and ulti- mately north into Orange or the 91-Riverside Freeway. Redhill Avenue terminates just south of the Airport and northerly at the Foothills, so it really doesn't go anywhere, and will be just an overflow for local traffic. In response to Councilman Edgar, the Director of Public Works stated that he has been involved in the preparation of these reports. Councilman Edgar stated there may be logic in Myford Road being an eight-lane highway so that it can have the traffic-carrying capacity without diverting it to other roads. The Director stated the City is currently working with the County to get their eastern corridor study initiated, and it's very conceivable that Myford Road could end up being the eastern corridor for an eight-lane freeway system directly to the 91 Freeway. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Council concerns be recorded in the minutes. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 54 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, ¢-18-83 XII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. 3. BULLET TRAIN ORAL REPORT The City Manager reported that Mayor Hoestery will testify on the City's behalf at the April 22 meeting of the Assembly Trans- portation Committee to be held in the Santa Ana Civic Center. Following that, the Mayor will appear on a panel, to be taped for Channel 50, consisting of American High Speed Rail Corpora- tion President Mr. Gilson, Assemblj~nan Young, and Mr. Bondi. The City Manager stated that of major significance, Councilman Greinke was successful in obtaining the State League Transporta- tion Committee's support of SB 704 as amended by the City. It will now go to the League's full board of Directors, and if approved, signifies that California cities agree with Tustin's position on the matter. Also, a letter from the Mayor was sent to the State Office of Planning & Research last week setting forth Tustin's position that the Public Utilities Commission should be the lead agency, and pointing out arguments developed by the City Attorney relative to the difference between an EIR and environmental studies. That letter was also sent to and discussed with the Governor's Office of Local Government Affairs, so they are aware of the issue. He added that the City's environmental consultant is developing some very preliminary information on noise and visual impacts which will be presented at the hearing by the Mayor; staff will continue to track committee meetings and monitor whatever acti- vities occur; and staff expects to have the consultant at 'the next Council meeting to provide a briefing on what they have found to date and what they're going to be doing over the next few months. Bill Robbins, Tustin Meadows Homeowners Association, Bullet Train Committee Chairman, also reported on activities of the committee and stated he will continue to keep Council informed of same. 101 REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters. 2. REGGIE YATES FF. J4ORIAL BASKETBAI.L GAME Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy reported that she and Councilman Salta- relli attended the Reggie Yates Memorial Fundraising Basketball Game and commended the Police Department for playing a great game. 3. SPEEDY RECOVERY - COUNCILMAN EDG/LR Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy expressed delight in having Councilman Edgar back without missing a meeting after recovering from eye surgery. 4. STORM DRAIN PRO,IECT BID CALL In response to Councilman Edgar, the Director of Public Works reported that the storm drain project will be on the Council agenda for the second meeting in May for authorization to adver- tise for bids. 5. RESCHEDULING OF HRY 9 WORKSHOPS In order to avoid a conflict with the Annual School District Dinner, Council concurred to postpone the workshop regarding Columbus Tustin Master Plan until after the City Council could consider the Master Plan at a workshop on May 16 at 4:00 p.m. The May 9 Joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop was rescheduled to May 23 at 6:00 p.m. in the form of a workshop session/dinner. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 4-18-83 CONHII-[EE APPOINTNENTS BY NAYOR Mayor Hoesterey made committee appointments for 1983-84 as fol- lows: Committee Representative Alternate O.C. Sanitation District ~1 O.C. Sanitation District #7 Public Agencies Data Systems Vector Control League of Cities CalTrans Advisory Committee Santa Ana River Flood Control N.O.I.S.E. Saltarelli Hoesterey Edgar Hoesterey Hoesterey Kennedy Kennedy Saltarelli Edgar Greinke Greinke Director of Public Works Greinke Edgar XIII. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT; CLOSED ~ION It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to recess at 8:01 p.m. to the Redevelopment Agency, and thence to a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. XIV. ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION 1. EL CAI4INO REAL/RRIN STREET I~ROVEMENTS PROJECT - R.J. NOBLE CO. By way of action out of Closed Session, the decision was announced as follows: Authorized release of all retention monies, except for $30,000.00, to R. J. Noble for the E1 Camino Real/Main Street Improvements Project. 95 XV. A~OUR~NT The City Council meeting was adjourned to the next regular meeting on May 2, 1983. MAYOR CITY CLERK