Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 8 SIGN CODE EXCEP 05-02-83DATE: May 2, 1983 CONSENT CALENDAR No. 8 5-2-83 nter - ¢ om TO: FROH: SUBJECT: Applicant: Location: Request: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner Sign Code Exception Graphic Productions on behalf of Town & Country Flowers 18352 Irvtne Boulevard To install a 50 square foot reader board sign. RECOI,~,~.HDED ACTION It is recommended that the 50 square foot reader board sign be approved by Sign Code Exception by minute order. BACKROU#D As a result of the approval of the officq development to be constructed on the north east corner of Holt and Irvine, arrangements had to be made to relocate the Town & Country Flower Shop. The resolution of this matter was a major concern of the Council throughout the entire history of the project. Through negotiations between Burnett-Ehline and the flower shop owner, the shop has been moved to 18352 Irvine Boulevard, a small retail center immediately to the east of the previous location. The shop owner agreed to move to this new location only if she could maintain signage comparable with that utilized at her old shop. The sign plan submitted is satisfactory to the owner. The signs requested are not completely within the purview of the Sign Ordinance and therefore under Article VII, Section 1, the Council is requested to consider a Sign Code Exception. Briefly that section states: The City Council may grant authorization for signs which are not within the purview of the standards and criteria established by this Ordinance, due to unusual circumstances related to the development, activity, or location of the proposed signing, subject to any of the following criteria: Mayor & City Council May 2, 1983 Page 2 Subject property is developed with structural setback more than two times the minimum front setback requirement of the district. Subject property frontage is at least 75% of the minimum frontage requirements for like signing. Proposed signing does not exceed more than one in number nor more than 15% in area of the aggregate size of signs authorized by the criteria of the district. DISCUSSION This department has received a sign plan for the new flower shop requesting two wall signs. One, a 45 square foot tennant identification sign on the store front, and the other a 50 square foot reader board on the rear of the building. Per Sign Ordinance 684, the flower shop would be allowed one 75 square foot sign for the front wall and one 25 square foot side wall sign totalling 100 square feet of aggregate sign area. The store owner is requesting a Sign Code Exception to install a reader board sign that is in excess of the 25 square feet normally permitted. The request before the Council falls within the criteria for a Sign Code Exception. The applicant is requesting less than the aggregate area than would otherwise be allowed, and also meets criteria number two above. It is recommended that the signs as submitted be approved based on the following findings and conditions: That due to the unusual circumstances of the development involving the relocation of the shop to allow redevelopment of the Burnett-Ehline property, and since the site has a property frontage of at least 75% of the minimum requirement as required in Article VII of the Sign Code, a Sign Code Exception is warranted. That the request is for less than the aggregate sign area than would be permitted so that no grant of special privilege would be given should the exception be approved. That no additional signing shall be permitted for the shop with the exception of a 5 square foot window sign if one is desired. All other advertising for sales, special events etc. should be accomplised by use of the reader board, and not by temporary window signs or banners. JSD:jk April 26, 1983 City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92680 Attn: Director of Planning Re: Town and Country Florist (Signage) 18352 Irvine Blvd. Tustin, CA 92680 Gentlemen: This letter is sent to explain events that took place during our effort to relocate above-referenced business and obtain satisfactory signage for same. As you may know, BUrnett-Ehline Company is presently developing the southeast corner of Holt & Irvine. All of said property falls within the Tustin rede- velopment area. In our discussions with the previous Director of Planning, we were always encouraged to privately reach an equitable solution for relo- cating the flower shop and not involve the redevelopment agency. Reasons for working out privately would be a cost savings to the city and a time savings to us as developers. In negotiating with the owner of the flower shop to relocate to the adjacent property, signage became a very important issue. On March 4, 1982, a meeting with the previous Director of Planning was held to discuss plans and sign rights. We discussed relocating an existing pole sign and mounting to the front of the building and installing a reader panel at the rear of the building. In an effort of cooperation the city agreed that where normally 2 signs would be allowed (one 25 sq. ft. and one 72 sq. ft.) a concession would be made to allow installation of 2 signs in any combination of 97 sq. ft. Two Thousand Fifty South Santa Cruz Street, Suite 100 '~ Anaheim, California 92805 (714) 978-0366 City of Tustin April 26, 1983 Page 2 Sign location and size was identified on the working drawings and submitted to the city for permit. It is my understanding that the sign permit was applied for but the subcontractor was short some paper work and inadvertently overlooked going back to pull the actual permit. I hereby request that the sign permit be issued. Sincerely, BURNETT-EHLINE COMPANY Richard Ehline, President RE/lg