Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 04-18-83MINUll~S OF A REGULAJ~ ~ETI#G OF TME llJSTIN CIl~f COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way April 18, 1983 I. CAJ-L ~ ~ER/ PLEOG~ OF N. LEGIAJiCE/ INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hoesterey at 7:01 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy, and the Invo- cation was given by Councilman Edgar. II. ROLL CALL Council persons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Richard B. Edgar Donald J. Sal tarel 1 i Frank H. Greinke William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works R. Kenneth Fl eagle, Acting Com. Dev. Dir. Royleen White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Serv. Isabelle McClements, Senior Citizens Leader Approximately 25 in the audience III. PROC- LAtlATIONS t. OLDER AI4ERICANS Il)NTH - MAY, 1983 Mayor Hoesterey read and presented a proclamation designating the month of May, 1983, as "Older Americans Month" to Isabelle McClements, Senior Citizens Leader, City of Tustin. Mrs. McClements thanked the Council and introduced AARP Chapter President Peter Mau, TLC Program Site Manager Nick Ogden, Tustin Senior Citizens Club President TrudY VanDordrecht, and Ken Hoesterey. 84 2. LAW DAY U.S.A. - MAY 1, 1983 A proclamation was read and presented to Don Ruston, Orange County Bar Association representative, by Mayor Hoesterey desig- nating May 1, 1983, as "Law Day U.S.A." Mr. Ruston expressed thanks to the Council on behalf of the Orange County Bar Asso- ciation. 84 IV. PUBLIC CONCERNS None. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS ZONE CHANGE 83-1 & ORDINANCE NO. 886 The Acting Co,b~unity Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated April 18, 1983, prepared by the Community Development Depart- ment. The Mayor opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. There. being no speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Ed~[ar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 886 have first reading by title only. Following reading of the title of Ordinance No. 886 by the City Clerk, it was- then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance' No. 886 be intro- duced as follows: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 4-18-83 VI · CONSENT CALENDAR ORDI~E NO. 886 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1031-1053 ANDREWS STREET; 1032-1034 ANDREWS STREET; 1021, 1033 SAN JUAN FROM MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R2 & R4) TO COMMER- CIAL GENERAL-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CG-PUD) DISTRICT Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 110 2. ZONE CHANGE 83-2 & ORDINANCE NO. 887 The Acting Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter<om dated April 18, 1983, prepared by the Community Development Depart- ment. The Mayor opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. person requested information on the matter, to Hoesterey responded: The following which Mayor Richard Knowles, 1291Arloura Way. There being no other speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed at 7:17 p.m. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 887 have first reading by title only. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. Following reading of the title of Ordinance No. 887 by the. City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedj/, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 887 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. ~7 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE RE-ZONING OF THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1252 IRVINE BOULEVARD (AND ADJACENT UNDEVELOPED PARCEL) FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.(R-1) DISTRICT TO PLANNED COt~MUNITY PROFESSIONAL (PC-PR) DISTRICT Motion carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 110 Item 4 was removed from the' Consent Calendar by Edgar. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the remainder o~ the Consent Calendar. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 1. APPROVAL OF MINI~TES - April 4, 1983 2. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $101,957.59 APPROVAL OF DEKaJiDS in the amount of $621,871.51 5O 0 DENIAL OF CLAIM OF NOR~,AR )lARD LONG; DATE OF LOSS: FILB) Will4 CITY: 3-9-83; CLAIM NO. 83-7 Deny claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 1-7-83; DATE 40 RESOLUTION NO. 83-32 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Flooring at Clifton C. Miller Community Center - Harlow Carpets, Inc.) Adopt Resolution No. 83-32 and assuming no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion, authorize payment of the final 10% retention amount as recommended by the Engi- neering Department. 39 Consent Calendar Item No. 4 - Moulton Parkway/Irvine Center Drive Realigment- In response to Councilman Edgar, the Director of Public Works provided a tentative project timetable. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to: 1) Adopt the following resolution; and CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 4-18-82 RE~UTION NO. 83-33 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPEC[FICATIONS FOR MOULTON PARKWAY/IRVINE CENTER DRIVE AND MYFORD ROAD FAU PROJECT M-M032(O04) 2) Authorize the advertisement of bids subject to Caltrans and F.H.W.A. approval of project and authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to set the date and time for bids to be opened, also subject to Caltrans and F.H.W.A. approval as recommended by the Director of Public Works in his inter-com dated April 13, 1983. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 95 VII. ORI)I- NANCES FOR I Nll~ODUCTION 1. LINITED TIME PARKING & ORDINANCE NO. 885 The Chief of Police presented the staff report and recommenda- tion. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordi- nance No. 885 have first reading by title only. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. Following reading of the title of Ordinance No. 885 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 885 be introduced as follows: ORDI)&~NCE NO. 885 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE R£LATIVE TO LIMITED TIME PARKING Motion carried 4-0, Greinke absent. VIII. ORDINANCES FOR AD(~TION - None 75 IX. OLD B~SlNESS - None X. NEW BUSINESS BID AWARD ~ EXTERIOR PAINTING OF CIVIC CENTER COI~LEX Bids for subject project were opened on March 31, received as follows: 1983, and Yang H. Klm Painting, Santa Aha Reza, Inc., Buena Park Jack Lewis and Dixon Painting, Sun City Cal-Pac Painting, Mira Loma $15,000.00 $15,650.00 $18,700.00 $19,600.00 Funds in the amount of $1g,o00.O0 are budgeted in Fiscal Year 1982-83 for subject project. As recommended in the inter-com dated April 11, 1983, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to award the con- tract for the exterior painting of the Civic Center Complex to Yang, H. Klm for the bid price of $15,000.00. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 39 e AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PURCHASE ORDER FOR FURNISHING OF 96' REINFORCED CONCRETE STOP~q DRAIN PIPE FOR HOULTON PARKWAY FAU PRO,)ECT M-H032(O04 } Bids for subject item were opened on April 12, 1983, and received as follows: Hydro Conduit Corporation, Corona Ampac, Inc., Upland United Concrete Pipe, Baldwin Park $13,790.26 $18,145.08 $20,199.24 The low bid is 17.4% below the Engineer's estimate of $16,700.00. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 4-18-83 XI. REPORTS Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated April 12, 1983, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize staff, subject to project approval by ~altrans/F.H.W.A., to issue a purchase order to Hydro Conduit Corporation, Corona, in the amount of $13,790.26 for the purchase of 114 lineal feet of 96" reinforced concrete pipe. Motion carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 91 3. SIGN CODE EXCEPTION - BARN RESTAURANT (14982 Red Hill Avenue) As recommended in the inter-corn dated April 18, 1983, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved b~ Salta- relli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize display of a §O-square foot wall-mounted reader board sign for the Barn Restaurant at the corner of Redhill Avenue and Moulton Parkway (14982 Redhill Avenue) subject to the following conditions: 1) The sign shall not contain exposed globe light bulbs as was requested; and 2) The lighting intensity shall be modified to bring the output into conformance with sign code limitations. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 93 1. Pt. ANNING CO))IlSSION ~TIONS Councilman Edgar expressed his concern on Old Business Item 2 - Parking Lot Review of Tustin Heights Shopping Center - on the April 11, 1983, Planning Commission Action Agenda, stating he felt the Planning Commission material he reviewed was inade- quate. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to appeal and agendize the parking lot issue and sign height issue in the Yustin Heights Shopping center for a public hearing, at staff's convenience. Staff/Council .discussion followed. The motion carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 81 The remainder of the Planning Commission Action Agenda of April 11, 1983, was received and filed by unanimous informal consent. 80 2. 1983 STATE TRANSPORTATION II,IPROVEMENT PROGRAM (S.T.I.P.) PROJECT SUBMIITN. S (INFORI~ATION REPORT) Councilman Edgar stated he has studied these plans very care- fully and was disturbed that they do not show Myford Road as a significantly better interchange, in terms of traffic movement, than Jamboree Road. The Director of Public Works clarified that these project submittals strictly pertain to the Sant~ Ana Free- way interchange properties. He added that both Myford and Jamboree are presently on the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highwa~ as major highway, and suggested that once the area has been totally reviewed through the traffic study to be conducted with the 2,000-acre Irvine Land study (once the need has been established), that Council can then determine exactly what size roadway is required, whether it be four lanes, six lanes, or two lanes. In response to Councilman Edgar's concern that the City be aware of the plan in terms of traffic movement, the Director of Public-~ Works stated that this program is for 1983, which runs from 1983 to 1988, and any projects submitted by the Orange County Trans- portation Commission would probably not even commence or have funding for preliminary engineering until 1986-87. The Director continued that any specific plans for Myford will come to the City for review; that the City will be an element of approval for the plan; that the traffic study should be completed within a year which will provide solid background for any proposed modifications; and there will probably not be any action on any of the projects for at least two or three years. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 4-18-83 Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy noted that Browning was submitted as a higher priority, and Jamboree as a debatable point. The Direc- tor of Public Works reported that the present Order of projects is how they fell out with all other projects within the County. At any time if the Council desires not to proceed with any project, it can be pull ed. However, the Director recommended against doing so until there is a complete study. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy's concern on displacement within the Jamboree Road residential community, the Director clarified that there would be no residential displacement with the Jamboree Road interchange. The right-of-way for both Jamboree Road and the interchange area southerly of the freeway was reserved for a full four-movement interchange when the Laurel wood Townhome development was initiated and with the industrial development to the east. This was a condition of improvement for both developments at the City's request. The Jamboree Road proposal is for a partial interchange with only two movements. The best time to get the community involved would be once the City is certain its projects are on a State priority list (they may not even be in the 1988 timeframe) and once there is a date certain for same. Mayor Hoesterey expressed concern that a receive and file action might imply Council approval of these plans. Councilman Salta- relli reminded Councilmembers that when this matter was under debate several years ago, the Laurelwood people spoke against a full interchange. Consequently, Council requested staff to direct that plans on Jamboree bring in a very scaled down ver- sion of getting the industrial traffic off of Walnut, so people could get on and off the freeway and not have to go past the residents, which is what this plan does. The Director of Public Works stated that each of the three projects would help disperse some of the traffic off of the Redhill connection from the interchange southerly on Redhill, and would help keep some of the traffic down on Walnut Avenue which is a big concern to residents that back up to same. In response to Mayor Hoesterey, the Director of Public Wor~s reiterated that the reason Jamboree is shown going through to Moulton Parkway is because that is how the Master' Plan of A~erial Highways within the County exists today. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy questioned why the report on Jamboree shows Redhill serving as a major overflow rather than Myford. The Director of Public Works thought it might be that with full development of properties north of the freeway in both Tustin and 1trine, ultimate development of M~q~ord as a six-lane highway is going to be at full capacity, much as Redhill is today. Myford Road will probably be the most desirable road to travel because it will ultimately go south into Newport 8each and ulti- mately north into Orange or the gl-Riverside Freeway. Redhill Avenue terminates just south of the Airport and northerly at the Foothills, so it really doesn't go anywhere, and will be just an overflow for local traffic. In response to Councilman Edgar, the Director of Public Works stated that he has been involved in the preparation of these reports. Councilman Edgar stated there may be logic in Myford Road being an eight-lane highway so that it can have the traffic-carrying capacity without diverti'ng it to other roads. The Director stated the City is currently working with the County to get their eastern corridor study initiated, and it's very conceivable that Myford Road could end up being the eastern corridor for an eight-lane freeway system directly to the 91 Freeway. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Council concerns be recorded in the minutes. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. ~ CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 4-18-83 XII. OlliER BUSINESS 1. 3. BULLET TRAIN ORA REPORT The City Manager reported that Mayor Hoestery will testify on the City's behalf at the April 22 meeting of the Assembly Trans- portation Committee to be held in the Santa Ana Civic Center. Following that, the Mayor will appear on a panel, to be taped for Channel 50, consisting of American High Speed Rail Corpora- tion President Mr. Gilson, Assemblyman Young, and Mr. Bondi. The City Manager stated that of major significance, Councilman Greinke was successful in obtaining the State League Transporta- tion Committee's support of SB 704 as amended by the City. It will now go to the League's full board of Directors, and if approved, signifies that California cities agree with Tustin's position on the matter. Also, a letter from the Mayor was sent to the State Office of Planning & Research last week setting forth Tustin's position that the Public Utilities Commission should be the lead agency, and pointing out arguments developed by the City Attorney relative to the difference between an EIR and environmental studies. That letter was also sent to and discussed wi th the Governor's Office of Local Government Affairs, so they are aware of the issue. He added that the City's environmental consultant is developing some very preliminary information on noise and visual impacts which will be presented at the hearing by the Mayor; staff will continue to track committee meetings and monitor whatever acti- vities occur; and staff expects to have the consultant at the next Council meeting to provide a briefing on what they have found to date and wh.at they're going to be doing over the next few months. Bill Robbins, Tustin Meadows Homeowners Association, Bullet Train Committee Chairman, also reported on activities of the committee and stated he will continue to keep Council informed of same. 10! REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters. 2. REGGIE YATES ~MORIAL BASKETBALL GAME Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy reported that she and Councilman Salta- relli attended the Reggie Yates Memorial Fundraising Basketball Game and commended the Police Department for playing a great game. 3. SPEEDY RECOVERY - COUNCILMAN EDGAR Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy expressed delight in having Councilman Edgar back without missing a meeting after recovering from eye surgery. 4. STORM DRAIN PROJECT BID CALL In response to Councilman Edgar, the Director of Public Works reported that the storm drain project will be on the Council agenda for the second meeting in May for authorization to adver- tise for bids. 5. RESCHEDULING OF MAY 9 WORKSHOPS In order to avoid a conflict with. the Annual School District Dinner, Council concurred to postpone the workshop regarding Columbus Tustin Master Plan until after the City Council could consider the Master Plan at a workshop on May 16 at 4:00 p.m. The May 9 Joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop was rescheduled to May 23 at 6:00 p.m. in the form of a workshop session/dinner. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, ¢-18-83 6. CO#MIl'lEE APPOINTMENTS BY I~YOR Mayor Hoesterey made committee appointments for 1983-84 as lol- lows: Committee Representative Alternate O.C. Sanitation District #1 O.C. Sanitation District #7 Public Agencies Data Systems Vector Control League of Cities CalTrans Advisory Committee Santa Aha River Flood Control N.O.I.S.E. Sal tarel 1 i Hoesterey Edgar Hoesterey Hoesterey Kennedy Kennedy Sal tarel 1 i Edgar Grei nke Grei nke Director of Public Works Grei nke Edgar XlII. RECESS - REOEVELOPMENT; CLOSED SE~ION It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to recess at 8:01 p.m. to the Redevelopment Agency, ,and thence to a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. XIV. ACTION Fa CLOSED SESSION 1. EL CAI(INO RF:J~./MAIN STREET I)~ROVEMENTS PRO~ECT - R.J. NOBLE CO. By way of action out of Closed Session, the decision was announced as follows: Authorized release of all retention monies, except for $30,000.00, to R. J. Noble for the E1 Camino Real/Main Street Improvements P roi ect. XV. ADJOURI~ENT The City Council on May 2, 1983. 'meeting was adjourned to the next regular meeting MAYOR MINUTES OF A PJ~GUL~J~ 14~ETING OF ll~E REDEVELOPMENT A~ENCY THE CIl~f OF llJSTIN, ~IFORHIA April 18, 1983 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Hoesterey at 8:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California, following a meeting of the City Council. ROLL HALL Agency Members Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson Pro Tern Richard B. Edgar Donald J. Sal tarel 1 i Frank H. Greinke William A. Huston, Executive Director/City Mgr. James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Royleen White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Services Dr. R. Kenneth Fleagle, Acting Com. Dev. Director Approximately 15 in the audience e APPROVAL OF MINIJll~S It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the.minutes of the April 4, 1983, meeting. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 4. RETAIL STORE E~AJJSION, 601-607 EL CAI~INO RF. AJ. As recommended in the staff report dated April 18, 1983, prepared by the Community Development Department,.it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by ~R' to approve the addition and si*re plan modifications at 601-607 E1 eal with staff recommendati6ns as follows: The repair and visual east property line. consideration. improvement of the chain link fence along the Redwood or wood-colored metal slats are under B. The finishing of the side and rear building areas to match the build- ing elevations of the addition. Ce The center is divided into two parcels and some of the parking spaces designated for use by the florist and jeweler are located on the larger structure, which is a violation of building code provisions. As a result, the property line should be removed or the properties held as one by the recordation of a covenant to tie the parcels together. The parce)s are presently owned by members of the same family and such an agreement should not be difficult to execute. A fire detection s~tem may be required. This provision will be dependent upon the structural characteristics of the complex. If the center is considered one building, as defined by the building and fire codes, a fire detection system will be required by law. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 81 5. llJSTIN HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENll~R ENTRA~JCE MODIFICATION It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to table the Tustin Heights Shopping Center Entrance Modification. Carried 4-0, Greinke absent. 81 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MI,,,dTES Page 2, 4-1_8-83 6. OTHER BUSINESS None. 7. AD~OURle~ENT Ai: 8:02 p.m. ii: was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesi:erey, i:o adjourn the nexi: regular meei:ing on May 2, 1983. Carried 4-0, Greinke abseni:. TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Regular Meeting April 11, 1983 The Planning Commission held a regular meeting Monday, April 11, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. in.the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 7:30 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Ainslie and the invocation given by Mr. Puckett. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Also present: Sharp, Ainslie, Puckett, White Well R.K. Fleagle, D.P.A., Acting Commun~ity Dev. Director Alan Warren, Senior Planner Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner James Rourke,. City Attorney. Janet Hester, Recording Secretary The Chairman announced that Mrs. Well had called to say that she would be in Alaska and would be absent from this meeting. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting held March 28, 1983 were approved as submitted. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. ZONE CHANGE 83-1 Applicant: Location: Request: Initiated by the Planning Commission 18112-18138 Main Street, 1031-1053 Andrews Street, 1032-34 Andrews Street and 1021 and 1033 San Juan Street To change the zone from Multiple-Family Residential (R2 and R4) to Commercial General Planned Unit (CG-PUD) After presentation of the staff report, Chairman Sharp opened the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chairman Sharp closed the Public Hearing at 7:34 p.m. Moved by Mr. Puckett, seconded by Mr. Ainslte, adoption of Resolution No. 2087 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 83-1. Motion carried: 5-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: SHARP, AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WHITE None WEIL 2. ZONE CHANGE 83-2 Applicant: Location: Request:. Initiated by City Council The two properties located at 1252 Irvine Boulevard To change the zone from Single-Family (R1) to Planned Community Professional (PC-PR) After presentation of the staff report, Chairman Sharp opened the Public Hearing at 7:37 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chairman Sharp closed the Public Hearing at 7:38 p.m. Moved by Mr. Puckett, seconded by Mr. Ainslie, adoption of Resolution No. 2086 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 83-2. After staff and. Commission discussion regarding possible development of the two parcels, Chairman Sharp directed that the minutes reflect Planning Commission Minutes April 11, 1983 Page 2 the Commission's desire to see the two parcels developed as one, or if developed separately, that they share common access by one driveway aligned with the Charloma signalized intersection. Motion carried: 4-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: SHARP, AINSLIE, PUCKE1-F, WHITE None WEIL PUBLIC CONCERNS: None. OLD BUSINESS: 1. South Central Redevelopment Project Al{er discussion regarding the extension of Newport Avenue, moved by Mr. Puckett, seconded by Mr. Ainslie, adoption of the report to the City Council as drafted. Motion carried: 4-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: SHARP, AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WHITE None WEIL 2. Parking Lot Review of Tustin Heights Shopping Center After presentation of the staff report, and discussion regarding · landscaping, it was moved by Mr..White, seconded by Mr. Puckett, to direct staff to prepare a report to the Redevelopment Agency requesting that $18,400.00 be allocated in the current fiscal year budget to reconstruct the public improvements in the Tustin Heights Shopping Center modification. Motion carried: 4-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: SHARP, AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WHITE None WEIL After discussion regarding conformance of the sign to the Tustin Sign Code, the Commission directed that the minutes reflect that the Commission encouraged retention of the mature eucalyptus trees on the site. Moved by Mr. White, seconded by Mr. Puckett, approval of the parking and sign plan as submitted. Motion carried: 4-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: SHARP, AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WHITE None WEIL NEW BUSINESS: 1. General Plan Revision Dr. Fleagle explained that .the General Plan required annual review and stated that the Housing Element was Of greatest concern because of changes in law which mandate a revision prior to July 1, 1984. Moved by Mr. Puckett, seconded by Mr. White, to review the goals, objectives and policies of the Housing Element and make recommended amendments.. Also, that staff agendize the item for the first regular meeting in July. Motion carried: 4-0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: SHARP, AINSLIE, PUCKETT, WHITE None WEIL Planning Commission Minutes April 11, 1983 Page 3 2. Retail Store Expansion, 601-607 E1 Camino After presentation of the staff report, a motion to receive and file the report carried unanimously. STAFF CONCERNS: 1. Report of Council Actions - April 4, 1983 Report received and filed. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Mr. Puckett asked if his service on the Citizens Task Force for Parks & Recreation caused any conflict with his responsiblities as a Planning Commissioner. Mr. Rourke advised that it did not. Mr. Puckett directed staff to look into a possible violation of the ordinance regulating garage sales. Chairman Sharp asked when Burnett-Ehline would be breaking ground and was informed that a demolition permit for the existing structure had been issued. ADJOURNMENT: At 8:58 p.m. to the next regular meeting. .James B. Sharp, C~airman Janet Hester Recording Secretary CITY OF TUb-'TiN 300 Centmniel Way Turn, Ca. 92.6~3. FIRST CLASS MAIL