HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 04-18-83REPORTS NO. 1
4-18-83
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING
April 11, 1983 7:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER At 7:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION - Ainslie/Puckett
ROLL CALL Co~m~issioner Weil absent
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR MEETING HELD March 28, 1983 - Approved as
submitted.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. ZONE CHANGE 83-1
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Initiated by the Planning Commission
18112-18138 Main Street, 1031-1053 Andrews Street,
1032-34 Andrews Street and 1021 and 1033 San Juan Street
To change the zone from Multiple-Family Residential (R2
and R4) to Commercial General Planned Unit (CG-PUD)
Findings:
1. That because of the nature of the surrounding areas
and adjoining commercial developments, the proposed
zoning designations are more appropriate.
2. The CG-PUO designatio~ dictates that any change to
the property requires that a use permit be
considered at a public hearing before the Planning
Co~ntssion.
3. This change will bring the zoning into conformance
with the Tusttn Area General Plan.
Action:
Vote:
Rec~mend approval of Zone Change 83-1 to the City
Council by the adoption of Resolution #o. 2087.
4-0 AYES: Sharp, Ainslie, Puckett, White
NOES: None
ABSENT: Well
2. ZONE CHANGE 83-2
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Initiated by City Council
The two properties located at 1252 Irvine Boulevard
To change the zone from Single Family (R-l) to Planned
Community Professional (PC-PR)
Findings: 1.
That because of the nature of the surrounding uses,
and because the property fronts on Irvine Blvd., a
professional zoning designation is justifiable and
more appropriate than single-family residential.
Planning Commission Action Agenda
April 11, 1983
Page 2
2. That professional offices have been traditional
buffers between residential and commercial uses.
That a proposed development includes keeping intact
an existing structure with architectural style
c~atible with the area, as well as maintaining
several of the mature trees on-site.
The Planned Cm~mnity-Professional zoning
classification dictates that any change to the
property requires a public hearing and use permit.
5. This zone change will bring the zoning Into
conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan.
That the Commission felt the Ideal development
plans would incorporate both parcels and access to
any developments would be shared by one driveway.
Action:
Recoa~aend approval to the City Counctl of Zone Change
83-2 to change the zoning of the subject properties from
R-1 to PC-PR by the adoptton of Resolution No. 2086.
Vote:
4-0 AYES: Sharp, Ainslie, Puckett, White
NOES: None
ABSENT: Weil
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
None
OLD BUSINESS:
1. South Central Redevelopment Project
Action: Approve the report to the City Council as drafted.
Vote:
4-0 AYES: Sharp, Ainslie, Puckett, ghite
NOES: None
ABSENT: Weil
2. Parking Lot Review of Tustin Heights Shopping Center
Findings: 1.
The City Engineer has reviewed the entrance
modification and found it to be coa~atible with
staff's concept of i,~rovtng the entrance/
Intersection to the shopping center.
Planning Commission Action Agenda
April 11, 1983
Page 3
This modification will provide a clearcut
signalized intersection of the shopping center
entrance in lieu of the existing skewed
intersection.
Action:
This improvement is within the Town Center project
area of the Tustin Co~nity Redevelopment Agency,
therefore redevelopment funds can be utilized in a
cooperative effort in obtaining these improvements.
Direct staff to prepare a report to the Redevelopment
Agency requesting that $18,400.00 be ~located in the
current fiscal year budget to reconstruct the public
improvements in the Tustin Heights Shopping Center
entrance modification.
Vote:
4-0 AYES: Sharp, Ainslie, Puckett, White
NOES: None
ABSENT: Weil
Findings:
The center sign plans show a sheet metal pole cover
which matches the existing sign cabinets for the
center wa11.
Action:
Vote:
2. That the Commission encouraged retention of the
mature eucalyptus trees on-site.
Approve the parking and sign plan as submitted.
4-0 AYES: Sharp, Ainslie, Puckett, White
NOES: None
ABSENT: Well
NEW BUSINESS
1. General Plan Revision
Dr. Fleagle explained that the General Plan required annual review
and elements should be revised to reflect changing conditions. He
stated the Housing Element was of greatest concern because of
changes in law which mandate a revision prior to July 1, 1984.
Dr. Fleagle requested that the Commission evaluate the
appropriateness of the housing goals, objectives, and policies in
contributing to the attainment of the State housing goals.
Action: Review the goals, objectives, and policies of the Housing
Element and make recommended amendments.
Planning Commission Action Agenda
April 11, 1983
Page 4
Direct staff to agendize the item for the first meeting in
July.
Vote:
4-0 AYES: Sharp, Ainslie, Puckett, White
NOES: None
ABSENT: Weil
2. Retail Store Expansion, 601-607 E1Camino Real
Findings: 1.
In conjunction with the building expansion, the
proposal calls for the re-striping of the parking
lot to accommodate the increased parking demand,
the addition of a trash enclosure at the southeast
corner of the site and the addition of planters
ad&acent to driveway on Sixth Street and E1 Camino.
The proposed parking count satisfies the mtntmum
requirements of the Zoning Code.
The center is divided into t~o parcels and some of
the parking spaces designated for use by the
florist and jeweler are located on the larger
parcel. Therefore a reciprocal parking and access
agreement should be recorded.
4. The proposal will he submitted to the Redevelopment
Agency for review and approval.
Action: Receive and file.
Vote:
4-0 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Sharp, Alnslie, Puckett, White
None
Weil
STAFF CONCERNS:
1. Report of Council Actions - April 4, 1983.
Action: Receive and file.
Vote:
4-0 AYES: Sharp, Ainslie, Puckett, White
NOES: None
ABSENT: Weil
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Mr. Puckett directed staff to look into a possible violation of the
ordinance regulating garage sales.
ADJOURNMENT: At 8:58 p.m. to the next regular meeting.