HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 04-04-83CO CJ'NCIL CHAMBERS
300 C~ntennial Way
April 4, 1983
TO ~ The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:02 p.m.
II. ROWEL
CA~L Councilpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
O~hers Present:
Richard B. Edgar, Mayor
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Frank H. Greinke
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Donald J. Saltarelli
None
William A. Huston, City ~ana!psr
Daniel K. Spradlin, Deputy City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Robez~a S. Ledendmcker, Dir. of Public Works
R. Kenneth Fleagle, Acting Com. Dev. Dir.
Royleen ~hite, Dir. of Com. & A~m4n. Serv.
Approximately 50 in =he audience
ILl. R~OR~a~I-
1. m~.~TI~ C~ I~LYOR - ~ALD Bo tS)g~a*~.z
Nominations for Mayor for the coming year were opened. Ronald
B. Hoesterey was nominated by Ursul& E. Kennedy, seconded by
Frank H. Greinke. It was moved by Grei~_ke, seconded by Kennedy,
that nominations be closed. Ronald B. Hoesterey wes elected
Mayor for a one-year term by a 5-0 vote. 3~
2°
Newly-elected Mayor Hoesterey presented outgoing Mayor 'Edgar
with a plaque and gavel in appreciation for his service.
S~L~CTI~ ~ NIL~)R PRO 'I~iPOI~ - ~u~A g. ~
Mayor Hoesterey opened nominations for Mayor Pro Tmmpore.
Ursula E. Kennedy was nominated by Saltarelli, seconded by
Grei~ke. It was moved by Edqar, seconded by Saltarelli, that
nominations be closed. Ursula E. Kennedy was elected Mayor Pro
T~pore for a one-year term by a 5-0 vote. 38
PPu. Y~'E ~ ~ - A~X~. 10--16, 19~3
Mayor Hoestermy reed and presented a proclamation designating
April 10-16, 1983, as Private Property Week ~o James Loom~s,
President, East Orange County Board of Real=ors. 84
At 7:06 p.m. =he Council recessed tc =he Redevelopment Agency. The
City Council meeting was reconvened at 7:09 p.m. with all m~hers
present.
V. P~"~-~C
1.
Kathy Well, 1702 S~..-~-mr~ille, representing Tustin Meadows Com-
munity Association, reported ~hat wa=er lines in Tustin Meadows
hsd been cu~ into by C~unicom d~ring installation of under-
ground cables, and approximately $100 worth of water had been
spilled. Ms. Weil requested Council permission for the Associa-
tion to bill Co~municom for ~he spilled water. The City Manager
suggested that the Association work through City staff for reim-
bursement of same.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 4-4-83
1.
Ms. Well also expressed concern that some of the street patching
had sunk since the recent rainstorms. The Director of Public
Works responded that the work is guaranteed for one year, and
any proble~ areas should be reported to him and they will be
taken care of.
Councilman Greinke reported that his area was without service
for three days because of the rainstorms and felt that Co,uni-
com should adjust their billing to reflect same. The City Mana-
ger reported that complaints have primarily been received on
quality control and installation, not on service. However, the
Public Works Department is the pr4mary contac~ on any complaint
that has not been resolved by Communicom. 53
The Ac=lng Co,unity Development Director presented the staff
repor~ and recommendation.
The public hearing was opened at 7:17 p.m. by Mayor Hoesterey.
There being no speakers on the mat=er, the .public hearing was
closed.
As recommended in the inter-corn dated April 4, 1983, prepared by
the Community Develop~en= Department, it was moved by Kennedy,
seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 884 have first reading
by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading of the
title of Ordinance No. 884 by the City Clerk, it was moved by
Edgar, seconded by KeHnedy, that Ordinance No. 884 be in~ro-
duced. Motion carried 5-0.
.It was then.moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, .that Ordinance
No. 884 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Fol-
lowing second 'reading of the title of Ordinance No. 884 by t_he
City Clerk, i~ was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, t-ha=
Ordinance NO. 884 be adopted as follows:
O~DINANCE ~10. 884 - An. Ordinance of the Ci=y Council of the City
of Tustin, California, EXTENDING INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO.
882 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFO~IA,
ESTABLISHING A M0~ATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS DESIGNED FOR
OFFICE USE IN THE C-1, C-2, CG, M AND PC-COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF EIGHT MONTHS
Roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli
None
None
81
Following a brief discussion period, it was moved by Edgar, sec-
onded by Hoesterey, to schedule a joint Planning Co,mission/City
Council workshop for May 9, 1983, at 6:30 p.m. to discuss City
policy and possible code amendments regarding office uses.
Motion carried 5-0. 81
~SQI,0'ff~(~i NO, 83-19 - G~NEP~L PLAN ~T 83-1(B) (1252
I~vz.m~ 900Z,EVAPD)
The Acting Co~unity Development Director presented the staff
report and recommendation.
Mayor Hoesterey opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. There
being no speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed.
As reco-~ended in the inter-ccm dated April 4, 1983, prepared by
the Cu~unity Development Depar~en=, it was ~oved by Greinke,
seconded by Edgar, tD adopt the following resolution:
CITY COUNCIL M/NUTES
Page 3, 4-4-83
~~ BO. 83-19- A R~solu=ion of t.he City Council of t_he
City of Tustin, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LARD USE ELEMENT
OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED ON A.P. NUMBERS
103-~26-26 & 103-626-27 (1252 Irvine Boulevard)
Carried 5-0. 5~
VII. COBS~NT
CAL~DAH
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve t_he entire
Consent Calendar. Mo=ion carried 5-0.
1. APPROVAL C~ ~ - March 21, 1983
PAF/~L in t. he amount of $108,891.83
t_he a~ou~= of $402,989.63
5O
· ~,~(~X~ NO. 83--29 - A Resolution of ~he City Council of
Tus=in, APPROVING THE DESIGNATION 0~ APPLICANTS AGENT (Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Adoption of Resolution No. 83-29 as recommended by t~he City
Engineer. 95
~~ NOo 83-30 - A Resolution of t_he City Council of
City of T~s=in, California, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
FLICT OF INTEREST CODES OF THE D~ARTMENTS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
RE~TI~ NO. 83-31 - A Resolution of t.he City Council of the
City of T~stin, California, APPROVING AN AMENDHENT TO THE CON-
FLICT OF I~REST CODE OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY R~DEVELOPM~NT
AGENCY
Adoption 'of Resolution Nos. 83-30 and 83731 as recommended
by the City Attorney. 81
VIIIo OR~IiI~Cl~ POR A~a.~a)~.~O~r None
IX. O~D~N~I~S ~R ADOPTID~ - None (~ee Public Hearing No. 1)
The Director of Co~aunity & Administrative Services presented
=he staff rspor~ and rscom~enda=ions as contained in her inter-
cc~ ~a=ed March 29, 1983, and responded to Council questions.
it was =hen moved b~ ~reinke, seconded by Kennedy, to schedule a
workshop for discussion of the Columbus Tus=in Project on May 9,
1983, at 7:30 p.m. After Council/staff dis~ssion t-he mo=ion
carried 5-0.' 77
BID ~ - TRAFFIC ~[~AL I~BUv~ E~ ~u ~r,.~. A~ AT
WALNUT A~, ~?~a~T A~E~E AT OXFORD AFlamE, ~ AF~E AT
Bids for subJec~ projec~ were received on M~ch 29 as follows:
Perry Electric, Spring Valley
Smith Electric Supply~ Stanton
Mandoza Electric, Hunting~on Park
Grissom & Johnson, Inc., Santa Ana
Steiny a Company, Anaheim
Baxter-Griffin & Company, Stan=on
Paul Gardner Corp., Ontario
$180,000.00
$187,900.00
$188,069.00
$192,600.00
$197,000.00
$209,466.00
$213,264.00
The low bid is 4.5% below the-Engineer's estimate Of $188,500.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 4-4-83
AS recommended in the inter-corn dated March 29, 1983, prepared
by the Director of Public Works, it was moved by Saltarslli,
seconded by Edgar, to award the bid for subject project to Perry
Electric, Spring Valley, in the amount of $180,000. Carried
5-0. 94
The Planning Co---~sion Action Agenda of March 28, 1983, was
received and filed by unanimous informal consent. 80
The City Manager co---anted that the monthly report dated
March 29, 1983, prepared by t_he Director of Public Works is an
initial version of what will be a routine reporC as requested by
Council. Councilman Edgar requested that staff include the
Febr~a~-y 10, 1983, League meeting where Tustin's Position on the
bullet train was supported by a majority of Orange County
cities.
B~T-T-~'T T~a~ - P(Tm'.TC ~
The City Manager rezLinded Council of the April 22 public hearing
of the Assembly Transportation C~-mwi=tee. Following Council/
staff discussion and consideration of the inter-c~- dated
March 29, 1983, prepared by the Director of Public Works, it was
moved b~ Greinke, seconded by Kennedy, to .appoint Mayor Ronald
B. Hoesterey as the designated representative to present testi-
mony at the April 22 public hearing to be conducted in Santa
And. Motion carried 5-0. 101
The City Manager also reminded Council of =he May 7 hearing on
SB 704 in San' Juan CapiStrano a~d reporte~ on bill amendments
which the City is proposing. Council/staff discussion fol-
lowed. Counctlm~n Greinke indicated he would attend subject
meeting.
XIZI. ~x~'~
BUSINESS
1.
Counc~lm~n Saltarelli stated he has been reviewing the environ-
mental impact statement on the modifications to the I-5/55
Interchange and reco-~-~nded the City be prepared to take a for-
mal position in support of ma~or modifications. The Director of
Public Works reported that the draft is a preliminary document
and suggested the City respond when the final document is avail-
able in four to six weeks. Councilman Greinke stated he is a
committee m~-her and requested individual Council comments on
same. He stated Cal Trans has been receptive to the City's
ideas, and the rough= draft preliminary EIR was provided as
requested for review of the financial impact. 54
Mayor Pro Tam Kennedy acknowlpdged receipt of the repor~ on the
.Voucher Program from the Director of Community & Administrative
Services and requested that a copy of. s~-~ be provided to Nick
Ogden, TLC Program, as a reminder of the procedure. 41
3 · CXTX ~.~K CI:~e~EX~DATI0~
The Council joined Mayor Pro Tam Kennedy in congratulating and
conuaending the City Clerk on compiling the new City of Tustin
information brochure. 37
CITY COUNCIL ~LINUTES
Page ~, 4-4-83
CouncilmAn ~dgar reported =ha= applican=s for Proje~-~ CoorduL-
ha=or fo= ~l~--~ng ~e ~e of ~e I~e l~d ~d b~n ~=~-
sele~. IC ~s ~ed by Edq~, seconded by SalC~mlli, ~
hire ~e fi~ of J. L. W~b ~t~ng ~ ~e Proje~ CoorS=or
for plying ~e ~e of ~e I~e l~d. C=i~ 5-0. 81
In response =o Councilman Edgar, t-he Dirmc=or of ~ublic Works
report:ed =hat s=aff ex~ec~s =o reques= Council au~oriza=ion =o
A~ril ~8 m~=inq.
Cou~cii con~arre~ =o schedule a workshc~ on t-he Wa=er Manag~en=
Plan, ~clusive of Ge new well sics s~ud¥, for May 10, 1983, a=
7:00 p.m, 107
a. Councilman Grminke =eflm~-~md on his firs= year in service as
a Counc41~--k~er and. =banked form~r-~ayor Edgax for an e~cit-
lng year.
b. Counci!-~n Gre£nke cc.,--~nded Police Chief Thayer for
c. A closed, session for dis~ussion of .leqal maC=ars was
It was moved by Grsinke, seconded by
lags of =he P~develo~men= Agency following ~he Cluy Council
mee=ings. Carried $-0. 38
Followinq Council/sCarf ~iseussion on ~ City Park Mas=mr Plan,
i~clu~q =he new I--'vine land, Council con=md Co individually
~x~ in a= =he Reynolds Group offices =o review sam~ prior =o
scheduling a workshop. 77
was ~ve4 by Greinke, seconded .by Edqar, ~o adjourn at
a Closed Session for discussion of legal mat=mrs, and =hence
~he hex= rog~lar meeting o~ April 18, 1983. Carried $-0.