HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 03-21-83 COUNCIL
300 Centennial Way
March 21, 1983
I. CALL
TO ~ The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7=05 p.m. follow-
ing a meeting of the Redevelopment Agency.
Councilpersons Present=
Councilpersons Absent:
O~hers Present=
Richard B. Ec~gar, Mayor
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Donald J. 8altarelli
Frank H. Greinke (arrived 7:06 p.m.)
None
WilliamA. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, Cl~y Clerk
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Dale Wick, Assistant City E~gineer
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Earl Row~mhorst, Water Services Manager
Appro~-mtely 70 in the audience
III.
1.
P0~r. TC 8CHOOGS ~ - APBI[, 24-30, 1983
Mayor Edgar read and presented a proel~m~tion designating
April 24-30, 1983, as Public Schools Week to Bill Watts, Nelson
School Principal. 84
A procl~mstion commending the Tustin Jaycees on their s~onsor-
ship of the "Miss Tustin Pageant" was read and presented by
Mayor Edgar to President James Barone, Pageant Chairm~n Cecil
Malacarne, and Master of Cere~onies David Edgar. 84
The Mayor added accolades to the Tustin Jaycees for this year's
outstanding production and noted that, in cooperation with the
Tustin Cbsm~er of C~erce, the Tustin Jaycees are sponsoring a
Tustin Mayor's Breakfast for April 20, 1983.
IV. p~n~.TC
1.
Nick Ogden, TLC Program, relayed instances of elderly citizens
in need and requested Council help in providing emergency assis-
tance for needy Tustin senior citizens. The Mayor responded
that staff will look into the effectiveness of the Police
Department/churches program and report back to Mr. Ogden. 41
2. powr. TC ~ ~
James Eakins, Master of Tustin Masonic Lodge No. 828, spoke on
Public Schools Week and invited the public to participate in and
suppoL~c America's educational system. Mr. Eakins extended
thanks to the Council for proclaiming Public Schools Week.
Bill Watts, Nelson School Principal and Trustee at Saddleback
Co~unity College, ex~ended an invitation to 'the Council and
audience to visit the schools ~uring Public Schools Week.
Mayor Edgar acknowledged the .presence of many students in the
audience observing local government in action.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES.
Page 2, 3-21-83
The City Manager suggested that Council proceed with the r-m-~nder of the
Agenda until 7:30 p.m. scheduled for the Public Hearing. Council concurred.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve the
entire Consent Calendar. Following brief discussion on Item No. 5,
the motion carried 5-0.
1. A~q-r. OW ~ - March 7, 1983
2. ~3LTIFICATI~ OW ~ in the amount of $103,585.03
AFPROFA~ C~ ~ in the amount of $456,337.61
5O
~ OW ~ OW D~OGLA8 ~0~IE; nar OW L~S: 11-21-82;
,,."n WX~H C~T~= 1--13--83; CX~3~ ~O. 83--2
Deny subject cla{m as recomm-.nded by the City Attorney. 40
~)~TION NO. 83-23 - A Resolution of t_he City Council of the
City of ~ustin, CONFIRMING THE APPLICATION OF THE MASTER PROP--
ERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT FOR THE ANNeXaTION OF DEVELOPED
PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN
Adopt Resolution No. 83~23 as rec~nded by the City Man-
ager · 24
~F~0~A]TI~ NO. 83--24 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin APPROVING SECOND REVISED '£~TATI%'E TRACT MAP NO.
11582 (1082, 1092, 1102 and 1112 San Juan)
Adopt Resolution No. 83-24 as recomended by the C~m,mity
Development Dep~ent. 99
~,~O~OTZ0~ NO. 83--25 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of T~stin, California, APPOINTING JAMES P. LOUGH AS DEPUTY
CITY ATTORNEY
Adopt Resolution No. 83-25 as r~com~ended by the City Attor-
ney. 79
Bide were received as follows:
HARDWARE SO~-~ARE TOTAL
Bradford Business System $11,720 $9,500 '$21,220
Hewlett-Packar~ 19,490 5,000 24,490
International C~puter Corp. 23,250 945 24,195
Philips Information Syst-~- 31,056 3,840 34,896
$11,695
CPU Enhancements were bid only by Hewlett-Packard
Award bid per specifications for computer hardware to
Hewlett-Packard for $27,141.30 and for computer software to
Bradford Business Systems, Inc. for $10,070.00 as recom-
mended by the Chief of Police. 87
HF~O[ZF~ZO~ NO. 83-26 - A Resolution of the City Council of
Tustin, California, OPPOSING THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS BY THE
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY UPON THE
SOtFfH COAST AIR BASIN
Adopt Resolution No. 83-26 as recommended by the City Engi-
neer. 67
90
~.~OLO~O~ NO. 83--27 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND S~ECIFICATIONS
FOR FURNISHING ONLY 96" RCP STORN DRAIN PIPE FOR MOULTON PARKWAY
FAU PROJECT M-M032(004)
Adopt Resolution No. 83-27 as recommended ~y the Engineering
Department. - 9~
10.
P~OJECT (~, ,-~ 92305F)
· Authorize the Mayor to execute Program Supplement No.'4 to
Local Agency/State Agreement No. 07-5271 as recommended ~by
the City Engineer. 45
83-12
CITY ODUNCIL MInuTES
Page 3, 3-21-83
11.
Authorize the Mayor ~ ~ecute ~e~ No. D81-028 in
beha~ of
City A~o~ey's office ~ ~c~ded ~ ~e Ci=y Eng~eer.
83-13
12. ~~ ~. 83-~ - A ~solu~ion ~ ~e City ~cil ~ ~e
Ci~ ~ ~in A~G ~ OF ~~ ~ ~r~O~Z~G
~I~ OF
fr~ E~e~ee Way ~ Prospe~ Av~ue - Grea~ ~ic~ Pipeline)
A~ ~solu~ion No. 83-28 ~ rec~nd~ ~ ~e Eng~eer~g
~nt. 107
VII. O~)]]~CE~ ~R I~IT~O~(ICTIO~ - None
VZZI. O~)]iNal~S POR AD(I~T~O~ - None
As recommended in the inter-c~ ~ate~ March 15, 1983, prepared
by the Director of C~unity and Administrative Services, it was
moved by Greinke, seconded by BoestereY, ~o continue subje~
ite~ ~o April 4, 1983. Carried 5-0. 77
This ite~ was table~ ~o follo~ ~he public hearing.
FLOOR wvm~mG ~ ~.T~TO~ C. ~vnr.~ ,.-~- '.:~z C~TEH
Bids for subjec~ projec~ were opened ~ March 3 and receive~ as
follows; '
Harlow Carpe~s, Inc.
Diamond Valley Co.
Lawrence Wo ;osine Co.
$ 9,292.30
$10,386.00
$11,756.44
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to authorize
Harlow Carpets, Inc., to remove and replace the floor covering
in the Clifton C. Miller C~unity Center building for the bid
price of $9,292.30, as recommended in the inter-com ~ated
March 15, 1983, prepared by the Public Works Depar~aent. Motion
carried 5-0. 39
2. BID ~ - FISCAL ~ 1982--83
Bi~s for subjec~ proje~ were opened on March 15 and received as
follows:
Schuler Engineering Corp., Anaheim
S.J. Burkhardt Contracting, Mira Loma
J & B Contractors, Inc., Crestline
Forster Construction, Orange
Go R. McKervey, Inc., Irvine
Loant Construction, Buena Park
Mir&montes Construction Co., La Puente
Cariaga & Scbmidt, Glendale
Jan G. Earnest Construction Co., Anaheim
John T. Malloy, Inc., Los Angeles
Brkich Bros. Corp., E1 Monte
R a L Sewer, Paramount
Jade Construction Co., Fullerton
Coronado Pipeline, Anaheim
G. R. Frost, Inc., wilmington
Gahi Construction Co., Inc., La Habra
$ 99,199.45
$100,387.50
$112,151.49
$117,773.14
$121,232.40
$127,037.50
$127,396.85
$132,780.84
$136,032.30
$138,878.50
$139,510.20
$144r046.23
$144,700.55
$152,210.75
$177,105.00
$181,597.00
The low bid is 32.6% below the Engineer's est/mate of $147,300,
and there is presently $138,900 budgeted for this work.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ·
Page 4, 3-21-83
V o PUnl'-Ti~-
R-msining budgeted funds will be utilized by water service crews
to make individual house connections to the new mains.
As rec ~c~m~ ended in the inter-corn dated March 15, 1983, prepared
by ~he Engineering Division, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded
by Hoesterey, to award the contrac~ for subject project to
Schuler Engineering Corp., Anahetm~ in the a~otmt of $99,199.45.
A question-and-answer period followed.
Council concurred to direct staff, upon project completion, ~o
provide a detailed reconciliation of material costs associated
with ~his ~trticular project.
The motion carried 5-0.
107
Following consideration of the staff repor~ dated March 15,
1983, prepared by the Director of C~unity & A~mtniS~rative
Services, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, to=
1)
Adop~ the policies and procedures regarding financial sup-
por~ for community non-profit organizations attached to sub--
ject staff report~ and
2)
Establish an ad hoc citizens review committee using sug-
gested staff guidelines, whose m~ers shall no~ be asso-
ciated with organizations requesting revenue sharing funds.
Motion carried 5-0.
The City Manager presented the staff repor~ and reconuaendation
as contained in his inter-com ~ated March 16, 1983. He reported
that to date, 57 protests have been filed by registered voters,
which have not yet been confirmed~ a petition has been filed by
base tenants opposing the reorganization~ and a letter received
from t.he Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy indi-
cating a desire for temporary suspension and objection to the
proposal.
The City Manager and City Attorney responded to Councilman
Saltarelli that once the public hearing is opened, it can be
continued from time to time, for a total no~ to exceed 60 days~
once the public hearing is Closed, Council must make a decision
within 30 days.
In response to the Mayor, the City Manager stated staff would
repor~ back regarding his inquiry on how much of the 147 acres
is presently within the Marine Corps base and how much is
involved in the land pres~m~Ly to be zoned industrial and the
right-of-way for Irvine Center Drive/Moulton Parkway.
The public hearing was opened at 7:39 p.m. by Mayor Edgar.
The following persons spoke in opposition to proposed Reorgani-
zation No. 53:
Jack Guiso, 4161 Robon Drive, Irvine, stated that the proposed
reorganization is an unnecessary encroachment.
Colonel Rober~ Mitchell, Conuaanding OffiCer, MCAS(H) Tustin,
stated that th~ Marine Corps has filed an official protest via
the letter dated March 18, 1983, signed by him and submitted to
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 3-21-83
the City of Tustin. In addition, the official ~ine Corps
position is that since three distinc~ routes are under active
consideration, fixing political boundaries on the basis of one
of the alternatives at this time is pr-mture.
Colonel Jerry Shelton, CO~unity Planning Officer, MOAS (H)
Tustin and MCAS E1 Toro, stated that they are very ha~py wi~h
the relationship between the Marine Corps and City, and they
would like it ~o remain that way. Colonel Shelton noted the
Marine Corps' involvement in many co~-n~ty events and added
that Ba~e residents are very distressed and concerned about the
proposed reorganization.
Councilman Saltarelli thanked Colonel Mitchell and Colonel
Shelton for their ommaents. He stated that the road alignment
is the real problem that meeds to be dealt with and a consensus
reached that will protec~ the ~m~ines' mission as well as pro-
vide traffic relief.
The following Ba~e reeidents also spoke in opposition to pro-
posed Reorganization No. 53:
Mar~ha Zellhar~, 8134-B Bancroft Way, Santa Ark~
Susan O'Brien, 6123-B Gooden Place, Santa Ana
It wes then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to continue the
public hearing for 42 days to May 2, 1983. Carried 5-0. 24
~A~-I B~G~T D
The City Manager presented the staff repoz~c as contained in his
inter-corn dated March 16, 1983. Co,nell/staff discussion fol-
lowed ·
Council concurred wiT/t Councilman Saltarelli' s request that
Council approval be obtained prior to filling any vacant City
positions. The-City Manager indicated staff would develop a
mechanism for same. 29
The Planning Commission Action Agenda of March
received and filed by unaD~moue informal consent.
14, 1983, was
80
Council discussion followed on the staff report dated March 16,
1983, ~repared by the Director of Public Works. It was then
moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edqar, that the Mayor be autho-
rized to offer Tustin's support for nominal beautification fund-
ing to the City of orange's position on freeway landscaping.
Carried 5-0, 67
3. · ~TER ~aNa~-~NT PLAN
Councilman Greinke left the Council dais at 8:22 p.m. and
returned a= 8:25 p.m.
Mayor Edgar expressed his thoughts on the concep~ of drilling
another Clt~ well. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke,
to direct staff ~o~'/mmediatly begin an analysis of where a new
well should be drilled, what it will cost to do' so, provide
analysis results for a workshop session, and'direct ~he Redevel-
opment Agency to allocate money for same. ~
A substitute motion was made by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy,
to set the matter for a workshop session to look at the entire
water system. After further Council/staff discussion, the
substitute motion was withdrawn by the maker and the second.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 3-21-83
The original motion carried 5-0.
107
Further Council/staff/consultant discussion followed regarding
Phase II of ~he Water Management Plan, line design for an auto-
matic water blending system, capital improvement requirements of
the system, the status of annexing water site parcels, and
repairing or deepening of existing wells, as o~posed to drilling
new wells.
XZI. ~
1.
The City Manager provided a brief update on legislation pertain-
ing to the bullet ~rain.
Bill Robbins, Bullet Train C.-~,~.4ttee, Tustin Meadows Homeowners'
Association, provided handouts to Counc~lm~hers and repoz~ced on
~he ~eting ia San Diego with Assemblyman Bruce Young, author of
AB 3647, and he also reported on continuing a~ivities of the
c~-m~ttee. Mr. Robbins congratulated Councilmen Saltarelli and
Hoestersy on their participation in the forum sponsored by Chan-
nel 40 on the bullet ~rain. A discussion ~eriod followed.
Council concurred to direct staff to provide a written
monthly report on,~he bullet ~rain. 101
Count flesh Saltarelli co~_ended the Police Chief for the excel-
lent enforcement of the 40 mph speed l%m~t on Main Street..
Co.ct1 m-n S~elli r~ested
poss~ity of rep~r~g ~e ~ey '~a ~e ~st office.
~ =es~nse ~ ~yo= m=o Tern Kenne4y on ~e Reggie Ya=~ ~-
ing ~=ident, ~e Police ~ief
res~nse =~ w~ for ~riv~ of ~e me.vat helicopter.
Mayor Pro T~ Ke~edy enco~age4 Co~ci~ers to provide
reco~tions ~ appoin= ~o ad4i=ional ~ers =o s~je~
c~tttee.
Counc~]m-n Greinke ex"tended an invitation to all to attend a
TGIF on March 25, 1983, at the Tustin Thrift & Loan.
6. lU~UBST FOR CLOSe) ~SSIOH
Counctlm-n Greinke requested a closed session for discussion of
legal matters.
At 9;13 p.m. it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Saltarelli, to
adjourn to a meeting of the Redevelopment Agency, and thence to the
next regular meeting of the City Council on April 4, 1983. Carried
5-0.
MAYOR