HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA MINUTES 12-21-811
MI~=raS OF A ~G~LAR ~TING
OF THE ~DEFELOPN~[T ~CY OF
· l'~a ~ OF TGSTIN, c~'r. TFOI~NZA
December 7, 1981
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 5:13 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
Agency M~mhers Present:
Agency Members Absent:
Others Present=
Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, saltarelli, Sharp
None
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
william A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director
Ken Fleagle, Planning Consultant
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director
Royleen White, Con~nunity Services Director
Approximately 22 in the audience
APPROVAL OF NI~=ra~
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to approve t_he minutes of the
November 16, 1981, meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
4. I~INE m'.FD. STOOl4 DI~ZN FAuJ~ZT~
AS recommended in the m~mn dated November 17, 1981, prepared by the Engi-
neering Department, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to
adopt Resolution No. RDA 81-14, and assuming no claims or stop payment
notices are filed within 30 days of the date of recordation of the Notice
of Completion, authorize payment of the final 10% retention amount
($16,006.60) at that time:
R~OIZF~I~ NO. RDA 81--14 - A Resolution of the Tustin C~mnunity Rede-
velopment Agency of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT
AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Desatoff Con-
struction Company - Irvine Boulevard Storm Drain Facility No. F07P13
and SIP 14)
Carried 5-0. 91
fids for subject project were received as follows:
Alfredo's Excavating & Paving Const., Azusa
Dyno Construction, San Dimas
American Construction, Buena Park
Luz Pina General Engineering, Los Alamitos
John Jezowski, Inc., Santa Ana
$13,147.50
$14,922.86
$14,956.65
$15,195.54
$20,834.75
The low bid is 0.60% below the Engineer's estimate, with $22,000.00 in RDA
funds presently allocated for this work.
Pursuant to the recommendation in the memo dated November 30, 1981, pre-
pared by the Engineering Department, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded
by Edgar, to award the contract for subject project to Alfredo's Excavat-
ing and Paving Construction, Azusa, in the amount of $13,147.50. Motion
carried 5-0. 86
6. APPROVAL OF DENAI~)S
AS reco~ended in the affidavit dated December 1, 1981, prepared by the
Finance Department, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to
approve the listing of demands in the amount of $429,991.18 as submitted
in accordance with Section 37208 of the Government Code. Carried 5-0.
81
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINL~ES
Page 2, 12-7-81
7. D~SZG'~ ~'~/I.~i - 160 PROSPECT
The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recom-
mendation that the Agency approve the architectural plans and deny use of
tandem parking spaces.
Agency/staff discussion followed. Mr. Saltarelli stated that if the
developer is willing to provide more parking, even tandem, it would be of
benefit. It was then moved by Saltarslli, seconded by Edgar, to approve
the architectural plans including the use of tandem parking spaces and
that they be clearly identified as such.
Mr. Hoesterey expressed his opposition to tandem parking as being very
frustrating and poorly designed. Mrs. Kennedy concurred.
Motion carried 3-2, Hoesterey and Kennedy opposed.
81
In response to Mr. Edgar's inquiry regarding the widening of Prospect and
the possibility of widening the entire road, the Director of Public Works
stated this could be pursued under the Redevelopment Agency. The City
Manager added that staff will check into the matter and report back to the
Agency.
As recommended in the memo dated December 2, 1981, prepared by the Direc-
tor of Public Works, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to
continue the matter to December 21, 1981.
Mr. Edgar expressed concerns over delay of the project, and stated that
the Agency had previously been informed the project would be completed in
May/June, 1982. The Director of Public Works responded that the May/June
completion date was an error and that this continuance would not delay the
project.
Motion carried 5-0.
95
9. p]~nTwr~])~ PLAN FOR S(:N:~TH/~XT. ~DEg"ELOPI~tT P~Ou-ECT
Pursuant to the m~o dated December 7, 1981, prepared by Dr. Fleagle,
Planning Consultant, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to
adopt Resolution No. RDA 81-13.
~ESOL~TIO~ NO. ~DA 81--13 - A Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Tustin ADOPTING A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE SOUTH/CENTRAL
REDEVELOPMenT PROJECT
Dr. Fleagle advised the Agency that a finalized map and legal description
are being prepared by the City Engineer under consultant contract. In
order to avoid new impositions on descriptions and increase in fees that
take effect January 1, 1982, staff will attempt to submit the documents to
the Board of Equalization prior to that date. Agency approval of the
resolution will authorize staff to proceed in that direction. This is one
project with two separate project areas.
Motion carried 5-0.
81
10. ~'~NC~
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 5:32
p.m. to the next regular meeting on December 21, 1981. Carried 5-0.
CHAIRMAN
RECORDING. SECRETARY