Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 07-20-81~ OF A ~ ~TING OF ~ TUSTIN ~ CO~CIL COUNCIL CHAMB~.RS 300 Centennial Way July 20, 19~1 I. CALL TO ~ The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 3:18 p.m. II. ~ ~a~z. CouncilpersOns Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli Sharp None James G. ~Durke, City Attorney Charles Thayer, Interim City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brote-~kle, Co~. Dev. Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Coup. Dev. Consultant Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director RoyleenWhite, Con~unity Services Director Eva A. Solis, Deputy City Clerk Nancy Miller, Administrative Aide Approx/mately 10 in the audience III. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to recess at 3:19 p.m. to the Redevelopment Agency meeting. Carried 5-0. July 20, 1981 1. The meeting was called to order by chairman Sharp at 3:20 p.m. 2. MAmhers Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Members Absent: None 3. ~ OF ~INOTES - July 6, 1981. It was moved by Edqar, seconded 'by Hoesterey, to approve the minutes of the July 6, 1981, meeting. Carried 5-0. 4e ~8OLOTZ~ NO. ~A 81--9 - A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the T~stin Co, unity Redevelopment Agency, ADOPTING T~E AGENCY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE AGENCY FOR THE ~ISCAL YEAR 1981-82 As reco~anded in the memo dated July 15, 1981, prepared by the Finance Director, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No. RDA 81-9. Carried 5-0~ ' 29 FE~OPM~T A~A Mr. Edgar provided additional information to his memo dated July 18, 1981, wherein he established a simple mini-goal to ~omplete undergrounding and street lighting on arterial streets within a basic downtown triangle bounded by Irvine Boulevard, NeWport, E1 Camino, and the E1 Camino extension to Irvine. It was moved by Edqar, seconded b~ Saltarelli, to establish the following four- year program within financial restraints: Year I - Fiscal Year 1982-83 - Irvine Boulevard from Holt to Newport and from Newport to Irvine (this would include the intersection of Irvine and Newport, but would not include the intersection of Holt and Newport). Year 2 -Fiscal Year 1983-84 - Newport Boulevard from Larwin Square to the flood control channel, south of I=wine and First Street, westerly 200 yards (this would include the Newport/Holt and Newport/First intersections). CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 7-20-81 Year 3 - Fiscal Year 1984-85 - Complete First Street from Newport to Prospect. Year 4 - Fiscal Year 1985-86 - Prospect from First Street to Beneta Way. Mrs. Kennedy requested staff input. The City Engineer indicated he had reviewed the proposal and it appears to be feasible. The Interim City Manager suggested Council might wish to delay any action on the proposal until after the public hearing to amend the finance plan of the Redevelopment Plan. Mr. Edgar stated that the main purpose of the program is to establish a simple wish list priority, which is subject to reorder, with the provision of permitting staff to make prelimi- nary contact with the utility companies in one-year increments to allow more valuable planning time, which has historically taken well over a year. Mr. Hoesterey stated his concern over at least reviewing the possible effects the proposal will have on the downtown area. Mr. Saltarelli stated the proposal is well thought out, and although there was at one time a massive program for under- grounding utilities it was pretty m~ch discarded until funds became available. He continued that the City should com~it to complete those high priority projects, and those contained in the proposal would help complete the original master plan for undergrounding. Chairman Sharp stated his support of the pro- posal. Motion carried 5-0. 81 7. ~ PO~E O~ EL C2~INO ~ AT SXXTH STREET In response to Mr. Edgar regarding an unused pole with overhead on E1 Camino Real at Sixth Street, the City Engineer reported that it belongs to the City and it will be removed in conjunc- tion with the E1 Camino Real project. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn at 3:34 p.m. to the 7z30 p.m. joint public hearing. Carried 5-0. M~TING OF T~STIN CTTX COUNCIL P~C%~v~u ~ 3:34 P.M. July 20, 1981 IV. PUBX~C CO~S None A~%~%OV~L OF MINUTES - July 6, 1981 APPItOVA~ OF D~%NDS.!n the amount of $601,268.77 RA~TFICATIO~ OF PA~.?. in the amount of $94,522.92 5O CITY COUNCIL MINbT~S Page 3, 7-20-81 o 4o VII. NEN B~SINE~S 1. VAX]:. ~ B~snums 1. ~ES0X/~TI~ NO. 81-86 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING FINAL MAP NO. 11282 LOCATED AT 1370 SAN JUAN STREET Adopt Resolution No. 81-86 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 99 ~.-z~ NO. 81-87 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Traffic Signal Installa- tions at the Intersections of Walnut Avenue at Browning Avenue and Walnut Avenue at Franklin Avenue - Baxter-Griffin Company, · Inc · ) Adopt Resolution No. 81-87 and 'authorize payment of the final 10% retention amount ($8,825.98) if no claims or stop. payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion, as recommended by the Public Works Department. 94 ~0X~TI~ 90. 81-88 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPRO%-/NG PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CENTENNIAL PA~K SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE II) Adopt Resolution No. 81-88 and direct the City Clerk to advertise for bids, as reco~ended by the Public Works Department. 77 ~TIO~ NO. 81-89 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ADOPTING THE CITY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING ~EVE- NUE OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 Adopt Resolution No. 81-89 as recommended by the City Coun- cil · 29 It was moved b~ Kennedy, seconded bF Edgar, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Carried 5-0. AS recommended in the me~ dated July 14, 1981, prepared by the Acting City Manager, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the rate schedule outlined in item 2 of Resolution 81-48 for Community Cablevision Company. Motion carried 5-0. 53 2. ~~ NO. 81--81 (~S~).- A Resolution of the City Coun- cil of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 81-14 TO AMEND EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED THERETO. Following additional co~ents by the City Engineer to his memo dated July 15, 1981, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, ~o adopt Resolution No. 81-81 (Revised). Carried 5-0. 104 AS recommended in the me~ dated July 6, 1981, it was moved b~ Saltarelli, seconded b~ Edgar, to authorize filling the vacant Police 0fficer position. Motion carried 5-0. 79 ~ FOR~aL~xr~xvs The Interim City Manager requested an Executive Session for dis- cussion of personnel and legal matters following the afternoon session. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 7-20-81 Kx~,a '~,F&'~ V,l~ 2. ?.'m~T ~ ~ AT ~0~%/'1'7T~ ~ In reference to the report dated July 10, 1981, prepared by the Engineering Department regarding the left turn arrow at subject intersection, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to direct staff to correct the directional sign to read, "Left or U-turn on Green Arrow Only." Carried 5-0. The City Attorney reported that no response had been received from the Boys' Club regarding the agreement between the City/ Walter Foster/Boys' Club. Councila%an Edgar indicated he would contact the Boys' Club representative on the ~atter. 4. ~ ABATeMenT O~ I~VINE BC~LEVARD Councilwoman Kennedy referred to a letter dated July 16, 1981, from Deby Brown, 1352 Olwyn Drive, regarding weeds on Irvine Boulevard between Red Hill and the Fire Station. Councilman Edgar noted that a major portion of the area in question is in the County jL~risdiction. Staff indicated they would respond to the matter. 5. BO~S' CLUB Councilwoman Kennedy commented that the letter from Leonard J. Kroko, 12541 Catalina Drive, Santa Aha, dated July 10, 1981, regarding the City/Walter Foster/Boys' Club agreement contains valid comments. Councilman Edgar indicated he would follow-up on the matter and repor~ to Council, noting that Mr. Kroko ia a County resident. It was m~ved b~ Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess at 3:44 ' p.m. to an Executive Session for discussion of personnel and legal matters, and thence to the 7:30 p.m. joint public hearing. Carried 5-0. II. JOINT )~ETING OF TUSTIN ~ CO(H~C~3~ AND NEDE~E~OPM~T ~C~ ~ AT 9:16 P.~. July 20, 1981 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 9:16 p.m. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None James G. Rourke, City Attorney Charles Thayer, Interim City Administrator Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer Ronald Nault, Finance Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Norwood Williams, Police Captain R. Kenneth Fleagle, Consultant Ed Knight, Associate Planner Approximately 32 in the audience CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, ?-20-81 III. JOINT · 'U~, .TC E~.ZNG 1. Charles Thayer, Acting City Manager, requested that the Publlc Hearing be opened, testimony ~aken, and the Public Hearing con- tinued to the August 17, 1981 meeting. The Public Hearing was opened at 9:18 P.M. There being no com- ments or objections, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Ed~, to continue the hearing ~o the August 17, 1981 meeting. Carried 5-0. 81 None V. COl]NC'n'- Counctlm~n Hoesterey asked if there had been any progress toward eliminating the Sycamore railroad line. The City ERgi- neet responded that he had not had any definite response bu~ he would contact ~he PUC and request eliminating the clanging sounds on the signals. Counci]m~n Edgar suggested doing so~e minimal improvaments on a parcel of the Col~-hus Tustin Park which adjoins Beneta Way and Prospect. It was moved b~ Edqar, seconded b~ Kennedy, for staff to make a minimal review for costs of planting grass and a few bushes on an approximate 20 ft. parcel adjoining Beneta Way and Prospect Ave. Carried 5-0. SIX STA~ C~BL~F/$IO~ ~PZNG Councilwoman expressed her disappointment that staff agen~ized the Six Star Public Hearing before the Plar~ntng Agency after Council had agreed that this equipment would not be satisfactory next to residential property and that broader notification to residents was not given. She said that staff had met the letter of the law but not the intent of the Council. Interim City Man~ger Thayer latitude the Council wishes. when the 300 feet from the tract, the whole tract should asked for ~irection as to what Councilman Edgar responded that property extends into ~art of a be notified. Councilman Saltarelli admonished staff for not informing the Council at the July 6 meeting that this Public Hearing for Six Star had been advertised, and he apologized to Councilwoman Kennedy for the argument at that meeting. Mrs. Kennedy e~pha- sized that the Council does not want these cablevision discs and antenn& next to residential property. It was moved by Edqar, seconded by Hoestere¥, to adjourn, at 9:39 P.M. to the next regular meeting on August 3, 1981. Carried 5-0.