HomeMy WebLinkAboutP.C. MINUTES 06-15-81TUSTIN PLANNING AGENCY
Minutes of Regular Meeting
June 1, 1981
The Planning Agency held a regul.ar meeting Monday, June 1, 1981, at
3:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 300 Centennial
Way, Tustin, California.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 3:03 p.m.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Hoesterey and the invocation
was given by Mr. Saltarelli.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp
None
A1 so present:
Michael Brotemarkle, Community Dev. Director
R. Kenneth Fleagle, Community Dev. Consultant
Charles Thayer, City Administrator (Interium)
James Rourke, City Attorney
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner, Recording
Secretary
MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting held May 18, 1981 were approved as
submitted.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Open Space Credit in Planned Developments
Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report and related that the
developments would still have to be approved under the conditional use
permit.
The public hearing was opened at 3:06 p.m. and seeing and hearing no
one, it was closed at 3:07 p.m.
Moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to recommend approval of this
code amendment to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No.
1972.
AYES:
NOES:
Kennedy, Edgar, Hoesterey, Sharp and Saltarelli
None
2. Final Parcel Map 81-1027
Applicant: Hall and Forman on Behalf of
Richard & Barbara Fontaine
Location: 440 West Main Street
After the Presentation of the staff report, the public hearing was
opened at 3:08 p.m.
George Shambeck, engineer, representing the applicant stated that the
owner is planning on building a Victorian style home on Parcel 2.
The public hearing was closed at 3:10 p.m.
Moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to approve staff reco,m,~endation
with the deletion of condition II-1, Resolution 1977.
Planning Agency Minutes
June 1, 1981
Page Two
Mr. Saltarelli questioned condition II-1 of Resolution No. 1977.
Dedication of, or an irrevocable offer of dedication of a ten foot
wide strip of land along Main Street across the frontage of the
subject property.
He related that he does not want to see Main Street widened to a
primary arterial and wanted to know why the City requests dedication.
Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, answered that the City has to protect
the right-of-way and comply with the requirements of the Orange County
Arterial Highway Financing Program. The proper method of down-grading
Main Street from a primary to a secondary arterial highway would be
through a formal request to the County of Orange for an amendment to
the Master Plan of Arterial Highways. If the City does not conform to
the requirements of reserving right-of-way, we could run the risk of
losing future county A.H.F.P. funds.
After further discussion pertaining to the highway classification
program it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy a substitute
motion to recommend approval to the City Council of Final Parcel Map
No. 1027 by the adoption of Resolution No 1977 as submitted.
Motion Carried: 4-1
AYES: Sharp, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy
NOES: Saltarelli
Moved by Edgar, sedonded by Kennedy directing staff to prepare a
report on the arterial highway systems regarding the down-grading of
Main Street and the status of Red Hill Avenue and Irvtne Boulevard.
3. Amended Use Permit 80-1
Applicant: Gfeller Development Inc.
Location: 228 West Main Street
After the presentation of the staff report the public hearing was
opened at 3:32 p.m.
Seeing.and hearing no one the hearing was closed at 3:33 p.m.
Mrs. Kennedy questioned the street parking on "B" & "C" Streets and
how it would impact the residences.
Bob Reese, representative of Gfeller Development informed the Agency
that they have considered this problem and have suggested that there
be one hour only parking on "B" Street. Since Gfeller Development
will be making their new headquarters in the Steven's House, they will
be keeping a close watch on the street parking and will work closely
with the City on painting the curbs if necessary.
Mrs. Kennedy questioned how long the chain link fence would remain
around the project? Mr. Reese answered approximately 10 months.
Moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy to approve Amended Use Permit 80-1
by the adoption of Resolution No. 1974 with the stipulation that if
Main Street is down-graded the offer of dedication shall be revolked.
Motion carried: 5 - 0
AYES: Edgar, Kennedy, Sharp, Hoesterey, Saltarelli
NOES: None
Planning Agency Minutes
June 1, 1981
Page Three
OLD BUSINESS
1. Resolution of Approval for Auto Mate Leasing (No. 1973)
Moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar to continue this item until
the zone change has been approved.
Motion Carried: 5 - 0
AYES: Hoesterey, Edgar, Saltarelli, Kennedy,
Sharp
NOES: None
NEW BUSINESS
1. Tentative Tract No. 11476
Applicant: Arnold Hamala
Location: 14512 Holt Avenue
Request: Subdivide parcels for townhouse development
Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report and related that the open
space lots are in Phase II and suggested that condition II-12 of
Resolution No. 1975 be amended to read:
12.
Through the CC&R's or by separate agreement, phases I and II
shall be shown to have reciprocal rights to use of common
access and open space/recreation areas. No final map or
development approval shall be granted to the Phase II portion
of Tentative Tract Map No. 11476 without provision for
establishment and use of such open space/recreation areas for
both phases.
Mr. Hoesterey commented that an area of concern is that there could be
4 or 5 years between the development of Phases I and II and therefore
Phase I would be developed without the open space lots.
After further discussion pertaining to the concern of the open space
lots, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to recommend
approval to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 1975
with the addition of private patios to Condition II-9 and the
amendment of Condition II-12 (as shown above).
Motion Carried: 5 - 0
AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Kennedy, Sharp, Hoesterey
NOES: None
2. Final Parcel Map 81-1026
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Gfeller Development Company
220 West Main
Subdivide one lot into two
Moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to recommend approval to
the City Council of Final Parcel Map 81-1026 by the adoption of
Resolution No. 1976.
Motion Carried: 5 - 0
AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Kennedy, Sharp,
Hoesterey
NOES: None
Planning Agency Minutes
June 1, 1981
Page Four
3. Revised Tentative Tract Map #10979
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Gfeller Development Co, any
220 West Main
Subdivide into 10 lots for office condominiums
Moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar to reco~m)end approval of
Revised Tentative Tract Map #10979 to the City Council by the
adoption of Resolution No. 1978.
Motion Carried: 5 - 0
AYES: Kennedy, Edgar, Saltarelli, Hoesterey,
Sharp
NOES: None
Revised Development Standards - Parking Areas
Moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to recommend modifications
to the City Council.
Motion Carried: 5 - 0
AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy,
Sharp
NOES: None
PUBLIC CONCERNS - None'
STAFF CONCERNS - None
AGENCY CONCERNS
Mrs. Kennedy mentioned drainage problems on First Street at the Tustin
Commons Condominiums and indicated she would meet with staff to
discuss the matter.
Mr. Sa~tarelli welcomed back Community Development Director, Mike
Brotemarkle after recent surgery. Mr. Saltarelli thanked Dr. R.
Kenneth Fleagle for acting as interim director and directed staff to
prepare a resolution of accommodation for Dr. Fleagle and Eugene
Snyder for their efforts to annex all county islands and certification
of recent census figures.
Mr. Saltarelli stated that he is concerned about the City's Noise
Ordinance and the provisions contained therein pertaining to week-end
working permits. Staff was directed to prepare a report for the next
meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Agency adjourned at 4:35 p.m. to the next regular meeting
on June 15, 1981 at 3:00 p.m.
James B. Sharp
Chairman
Mary Ann Chamberlain
Recording Secretary