Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP.C. MINUTES 06-15-81TUSTIN PLANNING AGENCY Minutes of Regular Meeting June 1, 1981 The Planning Agency held a regul.ar meeting Monday, June 1, 1981, at 3:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 3:03 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Hoesterey and the invocation was given by Mr. Saltarelli. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None A1 so present: Michael Brotemarkle, Community Dev. Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Community Dev. Consultant Charles Thayer, City Administrator (Interium) James Rourke, City Attorney Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner, Recording Secretary MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting held May 18, 1981 were approved as submitted. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Open Space Credit in Planned Developments Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report and related that the developments would still have to be approved under the conditional use permit. The public hearing was opened at 3:06 p.m. and seeing and hearing no one, it was closed at 3:07 p.m. Moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to recommend approval of this code amendment to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 1972. AYES: NOES: Kennedy, Edgar, Hoesterey, Sharp and Saltarelli None 2. Final Parcel Map 81-1027 Applicant: Hall and Forman on Behalf of Richard & Barbara Fontaine Location: 440 West Main Street After the Presentation of the staff report, the public hearing was opened at 3:08 p.m. George Shambeck, engineer, representing the applicant stated that the owner is planning on building a Victorian style home on Parcel 2. The public hearing was closed at 3:10 p.m. Moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to approve staff reco,m,~endation with the deletion of condition II-1, Resolution 1977. Planning Agency Minutes June 1, 1981 Page Two Mr. Saltarelli questioned condition II-1 of Resolution No. 1977. Dedication of, or an irrevocable offer of dedication of a ten foot wide strip of land along Main Street across the frontage of the subject property. He related that he does not want to see Main Street widened to a primary arterial and wanted to know why the City requests dedication. Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, answered that the City has to protect the right-of-way and comply with the requirements of the Orange County Arterial Highway Financing Program. The proper method of down-grading Main Street from a primary to a secondary arterial highway would be through a formal request to the County of Orange for an amendment to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways. If the City does not conform to the requirements of reserving right-of-way, we could run the risk of losing future county A.H.F.P. funds. After further discussion pertaining to the highway classification program it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy a substitute motion to recommend approval to the City Council of Final Parcel Map No. 1027 by the adoption of Resolution No 1977 as submitted. Motion Carried: 4-1 AYES: Sharp, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy NOES: Saltarelli Moved by Edgar, sedonded by Kennedy directing staff to prepare a report on the arterial highway systems regarding the down-grading of Main Street and the status of Red Hill Avenue and Irvtne Boulevard. 3. Amended Use Permit 80-1 Applicant: Gfeller Development Inc. Location: 228 West Main Street After the presentation of the staff report the public hearing was opened at 3:32 p.m. Seeing.and hearing no one the hearing was closed at 3:33 p.m. Mrs. Kennedy questioned the street parking on "B" & "C" Streets and how it would impact the residences. Bob Reese, representative of Gfeller Development informed the Agency that they have considered this problem and have suggested that there be one hour only parking on "B" Street. Since Gfeller Development will be making their new headquarters in the Steven's House, they will be keeping a close watch on the street parking and will work closely with the City on painting the curbs if necessary. Mrs. Kennedy questioned how long the chain link fence would remain around the project? Mr. Reese answered approximately 10 months. Moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy to approve Amended Use Permit 80-1 by the adoption of Resolution No. 1974 with the stipulation that if Main Street is down-graded the offer of dedication shall be revolked. Motion carried: 5 - 0 AYES: Edgar, Kennedy, Sharp, Hoesterey, Saltarelli NOES: None Planning Agency Minutes June 1, 1981 Page Three OLD BUSINESS 1. Resolution of Approval for Auto Mate Leasing (No. 1973) Moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar to continue this item until the zone change has been approved. Motion Carried: 5 - 0 AYES: Hoesterey, Edgar, Saltarelli, Kennedy, Sharp NOES: None NEW BUSINESS 1. Tentative Tract No. 11476 Applicant: Arnold Hamala Location: 14512 Holt Avenue Request: Subdivide parcels for townhouse development Mr. Brotemarkle presented the staff report and related that the open space lots are in Phase II and suggested that condition II-12 of Resolution No. 1975 be amended to read: 12. Through the CC&R's or by separate agreement, phases I and II shall be shown to have reciprocal rights to use of common access and open space/recreation areas. No final map or development approval shall be granted to the Phase II portion of Tentative Tract Map No. 11476 without provision for establishment and use of such open space/recreation areas for both phases. Mr. Hoesterey commented that an area of concern is that there could be 4 or 5 years between the development of Phases I and II and therefore Phase I would be developed without the open space lots. After further discussion pertaining to the concern of the open space lots, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to recommend approval to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 1975 with the addition of private patios to Condition II-9 and the amendment of Condition II-12 (as shown above). Motion Carried: 5 - 0 AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Kennedy, Sharp, Hoesterey NOES: None 2. Final Parcel Map 81-1026 Applicant: Location: Request: Gfeller Development Company 220 West Main Subdivide one lot into two Moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to recommend approval to the City Council of Final Parcel Map 81-1026 by the adoption of Resolution No. 1976. Motion Carried: 5 - 0 AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Kennedy, Sharp, Hoesterey NOES: None Planning Agency Minutes June 1, 1981 Page Four 3. Revised Tentative Tract Map #10979 Applicant: Location: Request: Gfeller Development Co, any 220 West Main Subdivide into 10 lots for office condominiums Moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar to reco~m)end approval of Revised Tentative Tract Map #10979 to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 1978. Motion Carried: 5 - 0 AYES: Kennedy, Edgar, Saltarelli, Hoesterey, Sharp NOES: None Revised Development Standards - Parking Areas Moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar to recommend modifications to the City Council. Motion Carried: 5 - 0 AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Sharp NOES: None PUBLIC CONCERNS - None' STAFF CONCERNS - None AGENCY CONCERNS Mrs. Kennedy mentioned drainage problems on First Street at the Tustin Commons Condominiums and indicated she would meet with staff to discuss the matter. Mr. Sa~tarelli welcomed back Community Development Director, Mike Brotemarkle after recent surgery. Mr. Saltarelli thanked Dr. R. Kenneth Fleagle for acting as interim director and directed staff to prepare a resolution of accommodation for Dr. Fleagle and Eugene Snyder for their efforts to annex all county islands and certification of recent census figures. Mr. Saltarelli stated that he is concerned about the City's Noise Ordinance and the provisions contained therein pertaining to week-end working permits. Staff was directed to prepare a report for the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Agency adjourned at 4:35 p.m. to the next regular meeting on June 15, 1981 at 3:00 p.m. James B. Sharp Chairman Mary Ann Chamberlain Recording Secretary