Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 11 A.B. 2055 05-18-81DATE: TO: FROI~: SUBJECT: MAY 12, 1981 No. 11 5-18-81 Inter- Corn MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR C. R. THAYER, CHIEF OF POLICE A.B. 2055 A.B. 2055, as introducted by Assemblyman Hart on 4/2/81, proposes to amend, add, and repeal section 3304 of the Government Code relating to public safety officers. This bill would expand the' administrative appeal, guaranteed by law to all public safety employees for punitive action or denial of promotion, from its current administrative rules of procedure and change it to a full evidentiary hearing. It would also propose that failure to comply with this full evidentiary hearing would result in certain funds being held back as local revenue as a matter of punishment. We would recommend that the Council send the attached letter and direct the Mayor to sign it on behalf of the Council, opposing this bill. Currently administrative hearings drag on for weeks at a time and the expansion of them to full evidentiary hearings would prolong them beyond manageable boundaries. The protection of the accused employee's rights are numer..~us and adequate under the current system. These changes would only serve the purpose of changing the thrust of appeal hearings to a search for technical error instead of the hearing aimed at ju:~t[ce for the employee and the public. ~'. R. THAYER CHIEF OF POLICE Attachment CRT:dh May 13, 1981 POLICE DEPARTMENT Assemblywoman Marian Bergeson 74th District California Legislature 4500 Campus Drive, Suite 344 Newport Beach, CA, 92660 Dear Assemblywoman Bergeson: The City Council of the City of Tustin wishes to advise you of our fervent opposition to A.B. 2055. It is our opinion that the passage of such a bill would only hamper the administrative appeal process of employees and is unneeded in view of the existing provisions of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act. The passage of A.B. 2055 would, in our opinion, change the thrust of the administrative appeal hearing from one of seeking justice both for the employee and the public served and move into the area of a hearing designed to seek errors in the evidenti~ry process rather than the truth of the charges made. We trust we can count on your opposition to this bill. Sincerely, James Sharp, Mayor for the City CoUncil cc: Assemblyman Ross Johnson, 69th District Assemblyman John Lewis, 70th District Assemblyman Chet Wray, 71st District Assemblyman Richard Robinson, 72nd District Assemblyman Nolan Frizzelle, 73rd District JS:dh City Center 300 Centennial Tustin, California 92680 (714) 544-8890