HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 4 CLAIM #81-7 03-16-81OATE: 3/2/81
No. 4
3-16-81
10: HONORABLE ~9%YOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JAMES G. ROURKE, CITY ATTORNEY
5U83££1: CLAIM OF RAY?.~3ND SA3/IEDO LUGO; CLAIM NO. 81-7; D/L:
CLAIM FILED W/CITY: 2/19/81
1/3/81;
After investigation and review it is recommended
that the above-referenced claim be denied and the City
Clerk directed to give proper notice of the denial to
the claimant and to'the ~laimant's attorney.
JGR:se
Enclosure
1. Claim of
Raymond Salcedo Lugo
CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC E~gTITY
(Section 910, Government Code}
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11I
In the liatter of the Claim of
.~AY~4OND SALCEDO LbGO
COUNTY OF ORANGE and
CITY OF TUSTIN
Name and address of the Clai[aant:
RAYMOND SALCEDO LUGO
2. Post Office address of the claimant for purposes of
i notices pertaining to this claim:
-- 12i
I LAW OFFICES OF SILVAS & EATON
13 i 1140 West Santa Aha Boulevard
i Santa Ana, CA 92703
14
3. Thc date and Flace cf the occurrence giving rise to
15
~ this claim is January 3, 1~1, in the City of Tustin, County of
16
Orange, State of California.
-- 17
4. At the above date and place claimant was arrested
18
__ by an officer of the Tustin Police DeFartment for an alleged
19
outstanding warrant for violation of Section 11357(c) of the
20
}~ealth and Safety-Code. Our law fire~ represented the claimant on
21
tha% matter and dis[~osed of the case on June 4, 1980, (See Central
Orange County Munici~s] Court Case No. 79CM051~2). The claimant
23
pleaded guilty to the lesser offense of 11357(b) of the Health
24
and Safety Code'. He was fined $100.00 plus the penalty assessment
25
wheel he Faid. The charge of violation of Section 11357(c) was
26
dismissed on motion of the District Attorney.
27
28 5. The identities of the public employees involved in
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
th~s clair, are presently unknown.
b. 7:s a direct and pro>;i:~ate result of the negligence
of thc County of Oranbc and the C'~ty cf Tustin, the clain,ant was
falsely arrested and ~r.:~risoned in the Grange County Jail for
api:roximate!y six (6) hours, causing serJous and permanent
injury to his m~nd and body.
7. The full nature and extent of claimant's damage is
unknown at this time. Claimant has incurred attorney's fees in
representing him on that matter in the sum of $500.00. Claimant
claims general damages in the su~ of $25,000.00 at this time.
WHEREFORE, claimant demands that the County of Orange
and the City of Tustin compensate him as set forth herein, or for
such other sum as may be mutually agreeable.
DATED: February 17, 1981. LA%'~' OFf'ICES OF SILVAS & EATON
By: M~CI!AEL J. SILVAS
Attor~ys for Claimant
20
-- 22
23
25
27
28