HomeMy WebLinkAboutNB 8 P.D. CANINE PROP. 03-16-81DATE:
March 11, 1981
N~ BUS IN~qS
Inter-Corn
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DAN BLANK~SHIP, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
POLICE CANINE PROPOSAL
Attached is a proposal by the Police Department to establish two police canine
units to aid in police protection within the City. I recommend approval of the
proposal.
The use of properly trained canine units can increase efficiency in certain police
searches while protecting the life of officers. The savings from that increased
efficieney will oover the oost of the program's expenses while adding to t_he
amount of police patrol time available.
The costs could be slightly higher due to the initial value of the transfered
vehicles and potential cost of replacement if future patrol cars are not suitable
for the purpose (for example, non moveable rear side windows).
DAN BLAN~ENSfiIP,
City Ac]ministrator
DB:dmt
DATE:
TO:
FROH:
SUBJECT:
March 11, 1981
NE~BUSIN~S
No. 8
3-16-81
nter- Corn
Honorable Mayor and City Co~'~ Members
Ron Nault, Finance Directo ~~
Police Canine Proposal
There are available salary savings in the Police Department to accommodate
this program. This will not require an additional appropriation by Council;
it will not have an effect on our City's spending limitation.
cc: Dan Blankenship
Chief Thayer
DATE:
MARCH 10, 1981
NEW BUSINESS
3-16-81
Inter-Corn
FROM:
SUBJECT:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
C. R. THAYER, CHIEF OF POLICE
POLICE CANINE PROPOSAL
After discussing the attached proposal with several of you and
with Mr. Blankenship, I am presenting the following supplemental
information which I feel might be of interest to the Council in
arriving at a decision in this matter.
COST
Assuming a service life of approximately six years, which does
not seem an overly optimistic possibility, the average cost for
this program staffed with two canines, over the current and
succeeding five budgets, would be $9,917 per fiscal year (fiscal
year '81 through fiscal year '86) (this figure is 1981 dollars
and we should expect some increases due to inflation). However,
this shows a very reas'onable cost for a program of high benefit. '
At the end of the service life of the dog, we would anticipate
another cycle with the purchase and training of a new canine at
an additional cost that particular year, and then moving back
into the lower yearly maintenance cost.
In reference to actual man-hour savings, a quick survey
determined there are an average of twelve incidents a day in
which the canine would be called upon to perform building checks
for burglary alarms or suspicious subjects in buildings. This
would affect a savings of approximately 5.4 man-hours per day for
the Police Department. Projected over the period of a full year
(49 working weeks) this is a saving of 165 man-days per year, or
two-thirds of one full time officer. This represents a dollar
savings of approximately $16,000 during the course of a year.
The extra time would be used to increase the woefully low patrol
time that officers now have. This would allow more work to be
done in the area of crime prevention and suppression, so that
less would have to be spent on "after the fact" police activity.
The feeling among the police officers for this program is such
that we will not have to anticipate special charges for the
boarding of the animal. He will be kept at an officer's home and
we will choose the officers to be assigned this duty with an eye
toward speedy emergency response to the City of Tustin should the
canine be needed during his off-duty hours. Therefore, in all
probability, canine handlers will be required to live within the
Page 2
Police Canine Proposal
3/10/81
County of Orange, but consideration will be ~iven primarily to
travel time from their residence to the City. Since the officer
will be provided with a unit to drive back and forth from his
home, the Police Department plans no further compensation and, at
this time, feels that it will not be a "meet and confer" item in
the immediate future. Realistically, this item might come up at
some future date, after the next contract has been settled, and
when the newnes~ of this program and excitation over it has
abated somewhat.
In order that we not go to the expense of training an officer and
then lose his services due to transfer to some other duties, or
his resignation from service to the City of Tustin, we will
require a written agreement to be designed by the City Attorney,
with a contracted service period for any officer working in the
canine unit. This will allow us to minimize undue expenses
caused by turnover among trained canine handlers. This does not
seem to present a problem and officers interested in the program
assure us it wil,1 not be one. However, we have further
investigated the idea of transferring the trained canine to a new
handler and find that with appropriate supplemental training,
this is a 90% surety with European bred dogs. The figure is
considerably lower with dogs bred in this country and this is one
of the primary reasons for seeking Council's permission to
purchase European bred dogs. It will allow us to maximize the
service life of the dog by transferring him from one handler to
another until retirement for him is mandatory because of physical
condition, rather than losing a dog because he cannot adapt to a
new trainer.
The conversion of the two police units to canine units will mean
that in the funding for replacement of those units, there will be
no trade-in value received for these two units. However, this is
a minimal and one-time only expense.
OTHER CONCERNS
It is iateresting to note that canine workhours seem to be very
parallel with human workhours and that while the fatigue factor
does affect the canine at the end of his eight hour day, he is
also subject to excitation and longer work effectiveness during
unusual occurrences (he senses much of this excitement from his
trainer and the other officers around him). We can therefore
expect that there will be no significant problems posed by less
strength of the animal or less endurance, etc.
There are no hard statisticts on the number of canines disabled
or killed in service and most literature on the subject speaks of
the dogs "honorably retiring" at the end of a long and fruitful
career.
Page 3
Police Canine Proposal
3/10/81
We were asked about the probability of the canine handler being
more inclined to use deadly force to protect his animal's life.
In fact, just the opposite seems to be true. Handlers have such
faith in the abilities of their animals that they are less
inclined to use deadly force. By the same token, the innate fear
of animals is such that suspects seem less inclined to' use deadly
force against an arresting canine than an arresting human
officer. In addition to this, the canine makes a smaller, faster
(and fiercer) target, so that even if deadly force is attempted,
it is less likely to be effective.
CONCLUSION
I find this program exciting and beneficial. The greatest
benefits should be realized in the protection of officers and
citizens and the increased effectiveness of apprehension and in
the provision of better service to the citizens of Tustin. This
program warrants your close consideration and I highly recommend
a favorable decision on it.
FISCAL IMPACT
Implementation costs are $6,450 per canine unit.
be allocated from unused salaries presently
Department budget.
These funds can
in the Police
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize Police Department to implement two canine patrol units
and related equipment with funds from unused salary accounts.
Chief of Police
CRT:dh
CANINE UNIT IHPLE~ENTATION BUDGET*
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
HOUSING & UTENSILS
VET. SERVICES & FOOD*
VEHICLE CONVERSION & MAINTENANCE*
HANDLER TRAINING
PURCHASE GEP, I~ SHEPHERD DOGS
· TOTAL IMPLEMENTATION COST
UNIT PRICE TNO DOGS
$ 370 $ 740
535 !,070
210 420
885 1~770
450 900
4,000 8,000
$6,450 $12,900
*This budget only considers those .on going maintenance, vet and food costs
through the end of this fiscal year, June 30, 1981.
AFTER PURCHASE, ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS ARE:
VET. AND FOOD $ 840 $1,680
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 3,420 6,840
TRAINING UPDATE & MISC. EQUIP. 400 800
$4,660 $9,320