Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 03-02-81I. CBLL TO ORDER II. ~OI~ C~T.L III. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. MINUTES OF A REG~£ING OF THE~3STIN CI~"~ COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way M-~ch 2, 1981 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 5:01 p.m. following the regular meeting of the Planning Agency and it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Sharp, to adjourn at 5:02 p.m. to the 7:30 p.m. Council meeting. Carried. The evening meeting was called to order by the Mayor at 7:31 p.m. Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None James Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer Michael Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police R. Kenneth Fleagle, Consultant Approximately 20 in the audience EL CAM/NO REAL ~7~DE~GROUND UTILITY DIST]~ICT NO. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 81-23 - A Resolution ORDERING THE WORK DESCRIBED IN RESOLUTION NO. 81-14, AND DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY AS THE REMOVAL OF POLES, OVERHEAD WIRES AND ASSOCIATED OVERHEAD STRUC- TURES IN THE AREA DESIGNATED THE "EL CAMINO REAL UNDERGROUND UTILITY. DISTRICT NUMBER FIVE," TO BE DONE Mayor Saltarelli said that this was basically a protest hearing to see if anyone wants to protest the formation of the Under- ground Utility District which would underground all the utili- ties on E1 Camino Real. The public hearing was opened at 7:31 p.m. There being no com- ments or objections, the public hearing was closed. One written protest was received from Una A. Boosey, owner of 460 E1 Camino Real, Tustin, and it was read by the City Clerk. She asked for a reconsideration of the estimated service conver- sion cost for her property. The City Engineer explained the process for undergrounding each individual parcel. We are in the midst of preparing the bid documents and each parcel will be bid on a separate basis and a competitive bid cost will be established for each and every one of the 34 parcels. The prices that were initially estimated were a very preliminary cost and in the case of Ms. Boosey, it does not include or take into account the work that she had done on her property. Once the bids are received on these individual service conversions, staff will contact each parcel owner and go over the cost with them. In answer to Councilman Hoesterey's question, Mr. Ledendecker said that the owner would have the option to have the work done themselves. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that there is an insufficiency of. protests in that there is only one protest, which does not constitute 50% of the property owners. Carried 5-0. It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, to pass and adopt Resolution No. 81-23. Carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 3-2-81 RECESS 2. ZONE CHANGE 81-1 (From R-3 to C-2P at 135--195, 305-325 S 'C' St) ORDINANCE NO. 842 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON "C" STREET UPON APPLICATION ZONE CHANGE 81-1 Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, reported that the Planning Agency recommends that these properties be rezoned to be consistent with the General Plan. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:43 p.m. There being no com- ments or objection, the Public Hearing was closed. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that Ordinance No. 842 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 842 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 842 be introduced. The Community Development Director clarified that this Ordinance provides for design review by the Council. Motion carried 5-0. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to recess to the Rede- velopment Agency meeting at 7:45 p.m. MINUTES OF A REGUI~%RMEETING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY March 2, 1981 1. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Saltarelli at 7:45 p.m. 2. Members Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Members Absent: None 3. APPROVAL OF MISR3T~S - February 17, 1981 It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the min- utes of the February 17, 1981, meeting. Motion carried 5:0. 4. BID AWARD -- EL CAMINO REAL UNDEI~GRDUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 5 Bids for this project were opened at 11:00 a.m. on February 24, 1981, and were tabulated as follows: Pacific Pipeline Const. Co., Corona, CA Hood Corporation, Whittier, CA Russco Const., Inc., Hawaiian Gardens, CA Irish Construction, Rosemead, CA Pacific Engineer's & Const.,Inc.,San Diego, CA John T. Fricke Const., Pasadena, CA J.R.J. Const. Co., Long Beach, CA Herman Weissker, Inc., Long Beach, CA Zapata Const., Inc., Paramount, CA Savala Const., Inc., Costa Mesa, CA $530,945.00 554,217.06 571,887.10 572,633.55 614,426.65 629,246.75 634,375.70 661,259.68 682,923.05 961,813.95 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to award the subject bid to the low bidder, Pacific Pipeline Construction Company of Corona, California, in the amount of $530,945.00. Carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 3-2-81 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to direct the City Engineer to prepare Request for Proposal (RFP) for the next meeting to obtain a consultant to draft a Redevelopment Agency Plan which would address the financial needs, available funds, and specific projects for Council's review before the next bud- get year. Councilman Sharp asked if his intent was to develop a new plan or were we going to use the older plan that we had. Councilman Edgar explained that we must commit to some specific task over and above what we had in the past before July so that we do not run the risk of losing our funding. Councilman Hoesterey suggested including a unit price as well as a fixed bid in the proposal. Councilman Sharp asked that the City Engineer include in his report a list of the names and addresses of firms that would receive the RFP. Motion carried 5-0. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, City Council meeting at 7:52 p.m. Carried. NG SE to adjourn to the PUBLIC CONCERNS M~NUTES OF TUSTIN CITY OOUNCIL RECONVENED AT 7:52 P.M. March 2, 1981 1. OPPOSITION TO DOME HOUSE AT 340 W. 2ND STREET Arthur M. Charleton, 460 W. 2nd Street, Tustin, presented peti- tions signed by 23 residents opposing the construction of a dome house at 340 W. 2nd Street. He stated that the house does not conform to the homes in the area and it was his opinion that it would decrease the value of the homes in the area. He asked the Council's cooperation in not allowing this home to be built. Mike Brotemarkle& Community Development Director, responded that this house meets the Zoning Code, the set backs and standards for R-1 property. There are no CC & R's, deed reviews, or design reviews on R-1 property. The City Attorney said the only way to control this would be through the Zoning Ordinance and under our ordinance, there is no design review required. Council concurred tha~ staff should write a letter to the devel- oper and inform him of the opposition of the homeowners and request that he work with them. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 3-2-81 CONSENT C~T.~DAR APPROVAL OF MINUTES - February 17, 1981 Regular Meeting APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $889,684.74 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $99,941.87 ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS & RRLRASE OF BONDS - PARC-~. MAP NO. 79-1032 (Northwesterly Corner of 17th Street and Pros- pect Avenue) Accept all public improvements constructed with Parcel Map 79-1032; and authorize release of Faithful Performance Bond #9SM-553-612 in amount of $52,400.00, Labor & Materials Bond ~9SM-553-612 in amount of $26,200.00, and Monumentation Bond ~9SM-553-612 in amount of $500.00 as recommended by City Engi- neer. 4e RESOLIF~ION NO. 81-21 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING COUNCIL MEMBER MONTHLY EXPENSE ACCOUNTS Adopt Resolution No. 81-21 as recommended by the City Adminis- trator. RESOLUTION NO. 81-22 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING PLACEMENT OF CERTAIN STOP SIGNS ("B" Street at Sixth Street) Adopt Resolution No. 81-22 designating placement of subject stop signs as approved by Council on February 17, 1981. RESOLUTION NO. 8~-24 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11428 LOCATED AT 1122 SYCAMORE AVENUE Adopt Resolution No. 81-24 as recommended by the Community Development Department. Councilwoman Kennedy asked that the Minutes of February 17, 1979 on page 3, ~nder Ordinance 838, contain information that Ordinance No. 838 was rejected in favor of amending the Uniform Fire Code, to be developed by the Fire Department and the City Attorney conjunc- tively. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the Consent Calendar with the above addition on Page 3 of the Minutes. Carried 5-0. VII. ORDINANCES FOR IN'r~ODUCTION - (See Public Hearing No. 2 on Page 2 of these Minutes) VII. ORDINANCE S FOR ADOPTION ~. ORDINANCE NO. 841 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR DEDICATION OF LAND, PAY- MENT OF FEES, OR BOTH FOR PARK AND RECREATIONAL LAND IN SUBDIVI- SIONS It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that Ordinance No. 841 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 841 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that Ordi- nance No. 841 be passed and adopted. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Sharp NOES: None VIII. OLD BUSINESS IX o NEW BUSINESS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 3-2-81 WAI2~GT A%~ENUE BIKE Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, reported that he had met with Mr. Watts from the Nelson School, Mrs. Herman and one other lady. One idea discussed was to put the trail just inside the fence on the school property and this would eliminate the prob- lem of the young people riding their bicycles around the corner in a right turn movement at Walnut Ave. and Browning Ave. A report will be forthcoming. REQUEST TO FILL PERS0~ VACANCIES -- POLICE DEPARTMENT It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the filling of the positions of one Police Officer and one Records Clerk in the Police Department. Carried 5-0. 2. MO'NT~.Y FINANCIAL REPOI~S Councilman Edgar commended Ron Nault for his report and it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to adopt the report of Ron Nault, Finance Director, dated February 25, 1981, entitled "Monthly Financial Reports," as a Council policy. Carried 5-0. 3. REVISION OF COUNCIL POLIC"f %7-01 AND FACILITY FEE SChK,JGI~E Royleen [%~ite, Community Services Director, reported that this revision streamlines all categories in order to make them easier to administer. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to: 1) Adopt the revision of Council Policy ~7-01; 2) Adopt the revision of Facility Fee Schedule; and 3) Acknowledge that approved applica- tions on the books as of 5:00 p.m., March 2, 1981, will not be subject to the new policy or fees. With the exception of emer- gency cases, there will be a ten-working day "freeze" on rental applications in order to train staff in the new process. New policy, fees, and procedures will be effective March 16, 1981. Carried 5-0. 4. SIX-STAR CABLEVISION Mayor Saltarelli said that Six-Star Cablevision is requesting authorization to use city property (the detached portion of the Columbus-Tustin parksite) to install a 100-foot antenna tower, three 20-foot earth station receivers and one 12-foot equipment building. His opinion was that public property should not be used for this purpose. Councilman Edgar asked if this was the land that was acquired by bond funds. · The City Engineer reported that this property was acquired from the School DiStrict. There are single-family residences to the rear of this proposed site. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to deny the request of Six Star Cablevision to sell or lease the land. Carried 5-0. 5. ANNEXATION NO. 121BAnT~3T ARGUMENT (Irvine Blvd.-Dean Street) R. Kenneth Fleagle, Consultant, recommended that the initial proporrents of the annexation, who have agreed to sign an argu- ment in favor of the annexation, be authorized to do so in lieu of the Council. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 3-2-81 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that if the resi- dents who initiated the annexation do not file an argument in favor of the annexation, the City Council will file one with wording substantially the same as the argument to be signed by the residents. Carried 5-0. O~"~ER BUSINESS 1. CANINE PRESENTATION Chief Thayer reported that if it was agreeable with the City Council, there would be a formal presentation of the Police Canine Proposal at 2:30 p.m. on March 16, 1981 on the grassy area to the rear of the Council Chambers. 2. w~.~VY TRUCk, S ON WALN--t~T A~-ENU~ Councilman Hoesterey requested that Chief Thayer investigate heavy trucks using Walnut Avenue. XI. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 8:27 p.m. to the next regular meeting on March 16, 1981. Carried.