HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 8 PARKLANDS ACT 02-17-81DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CONSENT CALENDAR
NO. 8
~ 2~17-81
February 10, 1981 ~ Imtee-
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Royleen A. White, Director of Community Services~'
'1 ~
RESOLUTION REGARDING PRIORITY PLAN FOR EXPENDITUREL_U~FDER THE PROVISIONS
OF THE CALIFORNIA PARKLANDS ACT OF 1980
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
In October 1980, the Tustin City Council adopted Resolution No. 80-101, in
support of Proposition 1, the California Parklands Act of 1980. As Council
is aware, Proposition i was passed by the California voters in November.
The key element in determining the allocation of these funds available to
Orange County ($6,726,633) is:
The County must submit to the State a "Priority Plan of Expenditures
(PPE)" approved by at least 50% of the population of the cities and
districts within the County, and by the Board of Supervisors.'
Staff has been actively involved in the initial efforts to have the Orange
County Division, League of California Cities, recommend to the County the
PPE most advantageous to our community. The League has recommended this
alternative to the County, as has the County's Harbors, Beaches, and Parks
Commission. The recommended alternative is to divide the entire $6.7
million among the cities and districts on a per capita basis, less $50,000
reserved for three south county coastal cities which didn't receive their
fair share of urban grant monies. This alternative will produce $125,463
for Tustin.
Council may notice that the population listed for Tustin is less than
current figures. This is due to the fact that all population figures are
as of July, 1980. Also, there is approximately $45,000 allocated for the
North Tustin C.S.A. These funds will be allocated to the S.M.A.C., and
Council may or may not wish to approach them with a possible joint project
sometime in the future. However no action regarding the S.M.A.C. is
necessary at this time.
Time is of the essence, as the county must receive a certified copy of your
Resolution by February 25, 1981, to ensure its consideration in time to meet
the deadline for County submittal to the State of its properly approved PPE.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Adopt attached Resolution, approving Alternative 3 as the priority plan
for expenditures of Orange County's allocation of funds under the
California Parklands Act of 1980.
RESOLUTION FOR PPE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA PARKLANDS ACT OF 1980
Page Two
February 10, 1981
Direct City Clerk to forward a certified copy of this resolution along
with Exhibit "A" to: R.F. Win§ard, Manager, Open Space/Recreation/CSA
Programs, Environmental Management Agency, P. O. Box 4048, Santa Aha,
CA 92702, no later than February 23, 1981.
RAW:ss
Attachments:
Resolution
Exhibit "A"
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
RESOLUTION NO. 81-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THl~ PRIORITY
PLAN FOR EXPENDITURE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CALIFORNIA PARKLANDS ACT OF 1980.
WHEREAS, the California Parklands Act of 1980 requires that each
county shall consult with all cities and districts within the County which
are eligible to receive grant funds under provisions of Section 5096.156 of
the Act and develop and submit to the State for approval a priority plan
for expenditure of the county's allocation; and
WHEREAS, said priority plan must be approved by at least fifty
percent (50%) of the cities and districts representing fifty percent (50%)
of the population of the cities and districts within the county; and
WHEREAS, said priority plan shall reflect consideration of
deficiencies within the county in the preservation of historical resources
and natural landscapes as well as in the provision of recreational areas
and facilities; and
WHEREAS, said priority plan shall also reflect regional park or
open-space needs as well as community and neighborhood park and recreation
needs in any county in which a regional park or open-space district is
wholly or partially located; and
WHEREAS, Orange County has consulted with this city as required under
the provisions of the Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Tustin approves Alternative 3 of Exhibit "A" attached hereto as the priority
plan for expenditures of Orange County's allocation of funds under the
California Parklands Act of 1980; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the City Council is hereby
authorized and directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution
along with Exhibit "A" to the Orange County Environmental Management Agency
for presentation to the Orange County Board of Supervisors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, this 1?th day of February, 1981.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
AI.TERNAT[VE PRIORITY PI,AN!/ OF EXI'ENDITURE,q
E?:h i {, i t
Polmlat ton2
A1 terna',, lye 1
^llocat Ion*
Al L(!ri'la L I vi. 2
Allocat l(,n*
Alternative
Allocation*
County Regions! Park Program
$2,000,000
County (Unincorp. Area CSA/D~sts.)
County Service Areas (CSA)~
CSA-3 Lacuna Ntguel
CSA-4 Lacuna Ilills
CSA-5 N. Tusttn
CSA-6 E1 Toro
CSA-8 So. Lacuna lltlls
CSA-9 Mission VteJo
CSA-I2 Aegean Hills
15,596
30,337
12,309
25,254
7,572
49,466
6,544
Sub-Total
.40,7 30
79,227
32,146
65,q52
20, (fflO I
12q,lg4
2 l, o0o I
Local Parka Districts
Captstrano Bay P&RD
Silverhdo Modjeska P&RD
$ 58 O85
112
45 843
94 056
28,20t
184 230
24
Sub-Total
Total County
-'n¢orporated Area
Cities
Anaheim
-- Brea
Buena Park
Costa Mesa
-- Cypress (P&R District)4
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Garden Grove
Hnntington Beach
]rvine
Lacuna Beach
-- La Habrs
La Palma
Los Alamitos
-- Newport Beach
Orange
Placentia
San Clemente
San Juan Capistrano
Santa Aaa
Seal Beach
Stanton
- Tustln
Villa Park
-- Westminster
Yorba Llnda
$ 57,653
112,144
45,501
93,354
27,991
'182,857
24,191
147,078 $ 387,239 $ 547,77~, $ 543,691
10,116
1,830
11,946
159,024
211,698
28,639
63,853
81,595
44,229
54,211
101,859
120,105
172,167
63,520
16,892
44,806
15,O50
11,2~3
65,283
87,~8
35,280
26,378
18 397
189 005
26 814
23 306
33 940
7 366
70 849
29,129
$ 26,419 $ 37,676
2u, 0001 20,
46,419 57,6Z6
$ 433,658 $ 605,450
37,395
20,000
57,395
601,086
$ $ 788 445
552,863
74,792
166,756
2] 3,O90
115,507
141,575
266,011
313,662
449,6~5
165,986
44,115
117,014
39,3o4
29,/,66
170,491
229,525
92,136
68,
48 ,{145
493,5q8.
70,026
60,~65
88,636
20,0001
185 ,o27
76,O72
106 663
237,813
303,891
164 726
201,903
379 362
447 317
641,216
236,573
62,912
166,875
56,052
42,022
2fi3,13P
327,320
131,306
98,242
68,517
703,922
99,866
86,800
126,406
27,434
263,869
108,488
782,567
105,868
236,040
301,626
163,498
200,397
376,534
443,982
636,436
234,80~
76,I39
165,631
55,634
41,709
241,326
324,888
130,417
118,898
82,922
698,679
99,121
86,153
125,463
27,229
261,902
107,679
Total Incorporated Area 1,643,542
$4,292,975
$6,121,183
$6,125,547
$6,.726~
TOTAL 3_L8_0=_2_~5_6_6_ .~6_, 726 L6 33 $6,7.26_~6==3._3- ..... 3.3,
*ALTERNATIVES: :" ~
1. Comparable to 1976 Bond Act distribution: $2H "Regional Park" funds were returBed to
local Jurisdictions based on competitive prloritizatlon of projects; balance allocate{
based on pro rata population. '.
2. Allocated based on pro rata population.
3. $50K allocated to Laguna Bench, San Clemente and San Juan Capistrano based on pro rat~
population in consideration o£ their'"~on-urban" status, therefore not qualifying for
urban grant Bond Act funds; balance allocated based on pro rata population.
NOTES:
2Minimum allocation per bond act criteria.'
3Population is based on fignres as provided by County Administrative Office.
County Service Areas without potential for park facility development (i.e., CSA-16 So.
Lacuna Illlls, CSA-21Rosamoor and CSA-22 East Yorba lAn(la) or not authorized to provide
recreational services are not included.
4Includes certain unincorporated area islands.
REH:d~h678(l~
...... : :: : 21L:l: ~