Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1947 08 18 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, HELD IN THE CITY HALL OF TUSTIN, MONDAY EVENING AT 7:00 O'CL0CK AUGUST 18, 1947 PRESENT WERE: COUNCILMEN: KIDD, CHARLETON, HUMESTON, FORNEY AND BACON. ABSENT WERE: COUNCILMEN: NONE CITY ATTORNEY C. ARTHUR NISSON JR. WAS PRESENT. CHAMBER OF THERE WAS NO COMMUNICATION OF ANY IMPORTANCE, BUT COMMERCE THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REQUESTED STREET SUPERIN- HANG BANNER TENDENT, MCMULLEN, TO GET PERMISSION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL TO HANG A BANNER ACROSS MAIN STREET EAST OF THE HIGHWAY AS AN ADVERTISING FEATURE IN THEIR DRIVE FOR MEMBERSHIP. COUNCILMAN CHARLE- TON MOVED THAT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BE GRANTED PERMISSION UPON WRITTEN APPLICATION TO HANG SIGN ACROSS MAIN STREET, AND CITY OCCUR NO LIABILITY. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO MAINTAIN SIGN AND REMOVE SAME AT THE END OF THIRTY DAY PERIOD. ALSO HAVE AGREEMENT SIGN BY AUTHORIZED PERSON. MOTION SECOND BY BACON. MOTION CARRIED. ROBERT ROBERT. J. MARSHALL, CAME BEFORE THE COUNCIL TO MARSHALL'S COMPLAIN 0F THE ATTITUDE OF CHIEF OF POLICE COMPALINT MCMULLEN IN AN INSTANT WHERE THERE WAS A MISUNDER- STANDING OR CONTROVERSY BETWEEN MR. MARSHALL AND THE CHIEF IN THE MANNER IN WHICH THE CHIEF WAS PARKED AT FIRST AND 101 HIGHWAY. MR. MARSHALL FILED A DIAGRAM TO BACK HIS CONTENTION OF THE OBJECTIONABLE PARKING AND RELATED THE CONTROVERSY FROM HIS POINT OF VIEW. COUNCILMAN CHARLETON MOVED THAT THE DISCUSSION OF THE MATTER BE HAD AT A FUTURE DATE AS THE EVENING WAS TO BE DEVOTED TO OTHER PROBLEM. MR. MARSHALL WAS PROMISED THAT THE DECISION OF THE COUNCIL WOULD BE REPORTED TO HIM IN A LETTER FROM THE CITY CLERK. COUNCIL- MAN FORNEY SECOND MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. MARTIN'S THE CONTROVERSIAL DISCUSSION FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH TRAILER D.X. MARTIN'S TRAILER COURT IS BEING HANDLED WAS COURT TAKEN UP IN THE COUNCIL FOR CLEARANCE. CHARGES DISCUSSION WERE FILED BY ATTORNEY NISSON NAMING VIOLATIONS OF THE CODE BY MARTIN, THE OWNER OF THE COURT. JAMES WALKER, ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT IN THE CASE, ABABLY DEFENDED MR. MARTIN AND PROMISED THAT ALL OBJECTIONABLE FEATURES IN THE MATTER OF HANDLING THE COURT WOULD BE OVERCOME IN DUE TIME. IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMAN CHARLETON CLAIMS IN THE FUTURE TO BE HANDLED ON COMPLAINTS FOR VIOLATION BE PLACED IN WRITING SO THAT A PERMANANT RECORD OF THE SAME MAY BE KEPT. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT DEPARTMENT FOR CLAIMS COULD BE KEPT BY THE CLERK WHERE THAT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT COULD RECEIVE THE COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTLY FROM THE PARTY MAKING THE COMPLAINT. COUNCILMAN HUMESTON SECOND THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. THERE WAS NO BILLS FILED FOR PAYMENT SO COUNCIL- MAN CHARLETON MOVED FOR ADJOURNMENT. COUNCILMAN HUMESTON SECOND THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Jerome C. Kidd MAYOR Chas.E.Morris CITY CLERK