HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 5 CLAIM #80-22 12-01-80TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
11/7/80
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
3AMES G. ROUR~<E, CITY ATTORNEY
CLAIM OF BORIS KORBEL; CLAIM NO.
7-9-80; CLAIM FILED WITH CITY:
CONSENT CAf.RNDAR
No. 5
12~lv~0
80-22; DATE OF LOSS:
10-16-80
After investigation and review, it is recommended that the above-referenced claim
be denied and the City Clerk is directed to give proper notice of the denial to the
claimant and his attorney.
J~R:se
Enclosure '
1. Claim of Boris Korbel
4
ANDREW 3. PRENDIVILLE
Attorney at La~v
15952 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 102
Irvine, CA 9271.5
(7 lt~) 333-9276
Attorney .for Claimant
5
8
9 BORIS KORBEL,
10
11 vs.
16
SUPERIOR CO'UR-T OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
Plaintiff,
THE CITY OF IRVINE, a public entity and a
municipal corporation, THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
a public entity and a municipal corporation,
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, a public entity
and a municipal cot.potation, DOES I through XX
inclusive, -='~"
17 TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN:
18
9.O
9.1
~5
De.fendants.
CLAIM AGAINST
PUBLIC ENTITY
I
BORIS KO'RBEL, hereby makes claim against-the CITY OF TUSTIN for the
sum of $600,000.00, and makes the following statements in support of this claim:
1. Claimant's Post office address is 12t42- Kennymead Street, Orange, Cai-
ifornia.
2. Notices. concerning this claim should be .sent to ANDREW 3. PRENF)I-
VILLE, Attorney at Law, 189~32 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite I02, Irvine, CA 9271.5.
3. The date of the occ¢lrrence giving rise to this claim is 3uly 9, 1980,
at approximately 10:30 p.m. The location of the circumstances giving rise to this claim
is the intersection of Redhill and Barranca, City of lrvine, County of Orange, State
of. California. Said intersection is controlled, maintained, and supervised by three mun-
icipalities: City of Irvine, City of Tustin, and the City of Santa Ar~a.
tr. The circumstances giving rise to this claim include, but are not limited
to, the lollowing: improper maintenance of traffic signals at the aforementioned inter-
section and defective design of the aforementioned intersection. Due to the dangerous
and unsafe condition of the aforementioned .intersectiOn, claimant whs seriously injured
about ~he body, .
6
Claimant's injuries include, but are not limited to) the following: broken
? right' leg, broken neck, severe spinal cord dama§e, multiple bruise, s, contusions and scars,
8
9
i0
11
12
£4
15'
16
and possible .paralysis.
6. . . The names of the public employees causing the claimant's injuries are
unknown at this time.
7. Claimant at this time seeks $600,000.00 in damages. The basis of comp-
utation of the above amount is as folloxx;s: medical treatment incurred thus far equals
approximately $100,000.00, however, said medical treatment is continuing and accordingly, I
this amount will continue to increase;..estimated future medical is not knowr{ at this
time; lost earnings ar~ presently'unknown, but a substantial amount will be shown accord-
lng to proof; gen'eral damages in an amount of $300,000.00.
17
18 ~ DATED:
2o I
October 13~ 1980
21
ANDRE%V 3. PRENDIVILLE
Andrew 3. Prendiville, Esquire,
on behalf of BORIS KORBEL,
Claimant.
2,2'/11
l,
2;.5i I!!
~ i III
25 I' !11
20I III
271 ///
.20 Ill
-2-