The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOB 3 BOYS CLUB SITE 10-20-80DATE: October 20, 1980 OLD BUSINESS Inter-Corn TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Corrrnunity Development Department SUBJECT: MV~ Easement, Boy's Club Site As requested by the City Council,.following is a parking analysis of the subject. development: Boy's Club building Current parking spaces (on property) Parking required by PM District (assuming 20~ support office area) 15,170 sq. fl. [approx.) 3O Office 3,034 sq, ft./300 = 10.11 }ndustrial 12,136 sq. fi./2000= 6,07 16 spaces Any use within the PM District is subject to Planning Agency approval of plans, elevations, and landscaping. If the Boy's Club site is fo be used for light industrial purposes, if would be appropriate fo require parking based upon the standard of the existing develop- menfs in the PM District (1/2,000 sq. fi,). AGW:r~n October 8, 1980 LAW OFFICES OF & Wo° l..rr SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 RECEIVED OCT 1 0 I980' {714) 835'77~7 Mr. John Donahue Donahue & Company 17291 Irvine Boulevard Suite 350 Tustin, California 92680 RE: MESSENGER DELIVERED Appraisal of Strip of Property, 41.75' x 200'+ Sixth Street, Tustin, California Dear John: This will confirm our request and authorization for you to provide a letter appraisal for the City of Tustin of the strip of property with 41.75 feet of frontage by 200'~ of depth on Sixth Street in the City of Tustin. The property to be appraised is described as follows: The easterly forty-one and seventy five-hundredths feet (41.75') of Parcel 2 of Map recorded Book 106, Pages 31 and 32 of Parcel Maps, County Recorder of Orange County, California. It is our understanding that you will provide this appraisal at a cost not to exceed $1,000.00 and that the appraisal will be provided in one week. The subject property lies easterly of the Tustin Boys' Club building and was originally a part of the property leased by the City of Tustin to the Tustin Boys' Club. If you will refer to the copy of the aerial photograph enclosed, you will see that on the easterly end of Sixth Street is the Boys' Club property, then the subject parcel, then a parcel sold by the City to Walter J. Foster Company and then furthest to the East is the existing, developed Foster property. NOTE: The City Attorney indicates the preliminary appraisal figure w~ll be available at the time of the Council meeting. Mr. John Donahue Re: Tustin Boys' Club -2- October 8, 1980 I say "originally" part of the property leased by the City of Tustin to Tustin Boys' Club because on September 30, 1980 the ~ . lease between the City of Tustin and the Boys' Club of Tustin was amended to delete from those demised premises the easterly 41.75'. If you will refer to the title report of First American Title Insurance Company dated September 13, 1979, their order number 0R-1278859, you will see a map attached to it which shows Parcel 3, which is the parcel that was sold by the City to the Walter Foster Company and Parcel 2 which is the parcel that was leased to the Tustin Boys' Club. Parcel 2 shows the demised premises as they were prior to the September 30, 1980 amendment which deleted the easterly 41.75' You will notice that on the map attached to the title report that a "40' easement for pipe- line purposes to Metropolitan Water District per 0R-6924-622" is shown. I've also enclosed a copy of a drawing I made which may be of some assistance. The net result of the situation is that: 1. The property that is to be appraised is 41.75' wide and 200' + deep. 2. 31~25' of this parcel is burdened with the MWD easement. The MWD easement does not by its terms permit placement of any buildings on it. 10.5' of the property to be appraised is clear of any easements. 3. The Boys' Club building encroaches 3.75' into the MWD easement. 4. With the September 30, 1980 amendment to the lease between the City of Tustin and the Tustin Boys' Club, the new easterly line of the premises demised to the Boys' Club will be 8.75' inside the MWD easement (i.e. the line will be 8.75' easterly of the westerly line of the MWD easement). This new line was set at this point so that there would be the required 5' setback from the edge of the build- ing to the edge of the demised premises. (It is anticipated that there will beAa boundary adjustment to the parcel map to change the easterly line'of Parcel 2 to this new location.) City land use limitations would not permit the use of the 41.75' parcel as a separate parcel. It may only be used 1) as part of the property lying easterly of it or 2) as part of the Boys' Club property. The Walter Foster Company is desirous of buying or leasing the 41.75' parcel from the City of Tustin. Mr. John Donahue Re: Tustin Boys' Club -3- October 8, 1980 The City of Tustin also must consider'the fact that it owns - Parcel 2 which is subject to the lease to the Tustin Boys' Club which has a remaining term of approximately 37 years. The 41.75' strip appears to have little utility as part of the Boy's Club. In fact, it has been largely unused by the Boys' Club for a considerable period. However, at the end of the term of the Boys' Club lease or upon any sooner termination of that lease, the 41.75' strip might have considerable utility and value as an addition to Parcel 2. On the other hand, the Foster Company would intend to add the 41.75' strip to Parcel 3 as part of a parking lot in connection with the proposed expansion of the Foster Company facilities. The City is mindful of the fact that it received almost $8.00 a square foot for the sale of Parcel 3 to the Foster Company on an open, competitive bid basis despite an appraisal of a much lower figure. Of course, that parcel was not subject to the building limitations of the MWD easement. The City is desirous of having this property appraised for its use and consideration in a possible sale or lease of the subject property. The City must be aware of the reasonable and fair market value of the property in order to make appropriate decisions on the sale or lease of the property and in order to fulfill its obligations of not disposing of property without receiving full. and fair consideration for it If you would like for the Engineering Department to make a more professional and clear drawing of the situation, please let me know and we will ask them to do that. If you have any questions, please advise. JGR:se:D:10/7/80 JGR:se:R:10/8/80 Very truly yours, ROURKE <W%ODRUF~ A.-tX gAMES G. ROURKE City Attorney Enclosures as cited. P.S. Per your request I spoke with Mike Brotemarkle, the Community Development Director, and he said he would get a copy of the Foster plans, one for development with the subject parcel and one for devel- opment without the subject parcel and deliver them to you right away. cc: Dan Blankenship Robert Ledendecker City Council P.S. to Dan Blankenship and Robert Ledendecker: Please review this letter and enclosures carefully and see if there is any corrections or additional information that are required. average ~it :-~te currency ap- ~r<:hasVd b)- No~ter- tn Sep- we!! wi~t o~er currer~ ~rket .._o~.da~'. ~,' ....... ,, ~,$,,y ,zr r~c. xi:'. :~ ~0~cZ!i~y_ . ..... ~'; : ...... ,,,,,,a~,,..,. : ..... ~ thc right to'do 50'O