Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 3 CROSSING GUARD 09-15-80DATE: TO: SEPTEMBER 9, 1980 REPORTS ! nter- Corn MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM:. C. R. THAYER, CHIEF OF POLICE SUB3ECT: CROSSING GUARD AT RED HILL AND OLWYN BACKGROUND: In November, 1979, a survey was conducted on each crossing guard position and a count was made as to how many children were being crossed at those particular locations. We found at the crossing of Red Hill and Olywn, we were crossing approximately 9 to 13 children per day. This was the lowest of crossings of our 14 City staffed crossing guard locations. In June, 1980, we contacted a Mr. Newman, Principal of Red Hill Lutheran School and informed him we were discontinuing the crossing guard position at that location for the following reasons: Small number of children.being crossed. The majority of the children crossed were being dropped off in automobiles and could be dropped off in the parking lot so that they needn't be crossed at all. 2. Difficulty hiring a crossing guard to only work one hour in the morning and then returning to work one hour in the afternoon. The crossings only took approximately 15 to 20 minutes but we were having to pay a guard at least a one hour minimum in the morning and a one hour minimum in the afternoon. When we didn't have a crossing guard, we had to use our police officers to perform the duty, making this very costly plus reducing our emergency response,.capabilities at a critical hour of the morning. During the first week in September, Mr. Newman was again contacted to remind him that there would be no crossing guard at his location. Mr. Newman became very upset and indicated that he felt we were being unfair and that we were jeopardizing the lives of his students. We explained to him our position and suggested that he could have a member of his staff cross the children as it would only take 10 to 15 minutes each morning and each afternoon to perform this function. Continued on page two Mayor, Council, City Administrator September 9, 1980 Page two On Friday, September 5, 1980, Mr. Newman contacted me and stated we had not given him enough notice and he did not have time to make other arrangements. I told him we would provide a crossing guard at his location for the first morning of school, and only for the first morning of school and after that he would be responsible for the children's crossing. FINDING: On 9-8-80, the first day of school, I had a member of my staff at the crossing. She arrived at approximately 7:50 a.m. and departed at approximately 9:00 a.m. A total of 10 children were assisted, three of which did not go to Red Hill Lutheran School. Two children crossed at approximately 8:00 a.m. and the remainder crossed at approximately 8:30 a.m. School starts at 8:45 a.m. and no children crossed after 8:30 a.m. Later that morning, a Mrs. Virginia Peters, President of the P.T.A. came to the station and requested a stop sign and jacket, which we provided. During the afternoon of 9-8-80, we received several calls from persons who refused to identify themselves but said they are parents of children and wished to voice their displeasure with our action of not staffing this location with a crossing guard. We explained the situation, some understood, others did not. It appears that Mr. Newman may have requested to the parents that they place a call to us. Some parents indicated that they may appear at the City Council meeting. CONCLUSION: Although Red Hill is a busy street, the staffing of a crossing guard at this location is not warranted. The small number of children and time involved indicates the Red Hill Lutheran Church could easily handle the crossing of their students more efficiently than the practice of the City performing this function. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. No further action required. C R THAYE , Chief of PoIlce CRT: sa