Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 08-04-80CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. RECESS MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way July 21, 1980 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 4:34 p.m. Present: Councilpersons: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Sharp Absent: Councilpersons: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Dan Blankenship, City Administrator Karen J. Beardsley, Deputy City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director Robert $. Ledendecker, City Engineer Royleen A. White, Community Services Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ed Bushong, Finance Director Loni Hamblin, Finance Coordinator Approximately 10 in the audience It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency at 4:35 p.m. Carried 5:0. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY July 21, 1980 1. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Saltarelli at 4:35 p.m. 2. Present: Members: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Sharp Absent: Members: None 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of July 8, 1980 meeting. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Sharp, to approve the Minutes of the July 8, 1980 meeting. Carried 5:0. 4. I~ATIFICATION OF DEMANDS in the amount of $267.50. It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, to approve the Demands in the amount of $267.50. Carried 5:0. 5. It was requested by Councilman Sharp that Council support the League of California Cities' position on Senate Bill 1972, which declares that tax increments are not the proceeds of taxes and thus are an appropriation subject to limitation under the Gann Initiative, and to send letters accordingly to help assure that Tustin's Redevelopment Agency remains a viable one financially. Council concurred. 6. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn at 4:37 p.m. to the City Council meeting. Carried 5:0. CHAIRMAN RECORDING SECRETARY MINUTES OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 4:37 P.M. July 21, 1980 PUBLIC CONCERNS None. II. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.- July 8, 1980 meeting 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $27,001.61 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $82,644.26 3. RESOLUTION NO. 80-73 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION - Fiscal Year 1979-80 Street Maintenance Program COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 7/21/80 Adoption of Resolution No. 80-73, as recommended by the Engineering Department. RESOLUTION NO. 80-74 A Resolution of the City Council, City of Tustin, California, CONFIRMING WEED AND REFUSE ABATEMENT CHARGES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-74, as recommended by the Community Development Department. 5o RESOLUTION NO. 80-75 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-70, RELATIVE TO THE SECOND YEAR SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-MANAGEMENT SWORN POLICE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-75, as recommended by the City Manage- ment Negotiation Team and the City Administrator. 6o RESOLUTION NO. 80-76 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-71, RELATIVE TO THE SECOND YEAR SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND MANAGEMENT OFFICERS, AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES. Adoption of Resolution 'No. 80-76, as recommended by the City Manage- ment Negotiation Team and the City Administrator. RESOLUTION NO. 80-79 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, PERTAINING TO THE DISABILITY RETIREmeNT OF KENNETH BARTON Adoption of Resolution No. 80-79, as recommended by the Retirement Review Board. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF TRACT NO. 10401 (PARK IRVINE BUSINESS CENTER) AND RELEASE OF BONDS Acceptance of the public improvements within Tract No. 10401 and authorization for the release of the Faithful Performance Bond No. 7117497, in the amount of $99,500; Labor and Materials Bond No. 7117497, in the amount of $49,740; and the Monumentation Bond No. 7117498, in the amount of $2,640, as recommended by the Engineering Department. 9. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF CASH BOND RELATIVE TO PARCEL MAP NO. 79-1033 (West side of Pasadena & Second Street) Acceptance of the public improvements within Parcel Map No. 79-1033 and authorization for the release of the cash bond for said improve- ments, in the amount of $6,300, as recommended by the Engineering Department. 10. GALBRAITH & GREEN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT Approval of the Galbraith & Green Administrative Service Agreement with noted changes, as recommended by the Finance Department. 11. AHFP PROJECT NO. 939 AND F07 FLOOD CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS - RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION Adoption of a Minute Order authorizing the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest to the acceptance certificate on the Road Easement Deed dedicating the right-of-way required for the con- struction of AHFP Project No. 939 and F07 Channel Improvements, as recommended by the Engineering Department. Item No. 4 - RESOLUTION NO. 80-74 A Resolution of the City Council, City of Tustin, California, CONFIRMING WEED AND REFUSE ABATEMENT CHARGES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81 Councilman Edgar requested identification as to where the particular parcels are located. Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, said that he will supply that inforr~ation to Council. COUNCIL'MINUTES Page 3, 7/21/80 It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, that the Consent Calendar be approved. Carried 5:0. III. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION None. IV. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 828 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF ARTICLE 4 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO NOISE CONTROL. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that Ordinance No. 828 have second reading by title only. Carried 5:0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 828 by Karen J. Beardsley, Deputy City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by E~gar, that Ordinance No. 828 be passed and adopted. Carried 4:1. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Sharp, Kennedy NOES: Saltarelli, Ve OLD BUSINESS None. VI. NEW BUSINESS 1. RESTRICTED ALLEY PARKING (SOUTHERLY OF LINDA LANE AND EASTERLY OF YORBA STREET) Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, reported that a copy of the Engineering Department's report on this subject had been sent to every resident involved; and, since that time, only one reply has been received from the resident at 13671 Rosalind. That person felt that if parking were allowed on either the east or west side it would create an impact on the other residents. The staff recommendation is to leave the signs as they are. Councilman Edgar commented that the primary residents that are incon- venienced by the parking restriction in the alley are those whose houses front on Yorba Street. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy,.to restrict parking on only one side of the alleY (west) and in the cul-de-sac. Carried 5:0. TUSTIN VILLAGE WAY SIGNING It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy, to authorize the installation of 25 MPH signs for both directions of travel on Tustin Village Way between the freeway ramps and Alliance Avenue; and to replace the "McFadden Avenue" directional sign westerly of the freeway ramps with a new sign (identical) in a slightly lower position for better visibility. Carried 5:0. REGULATION OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING STRUCTURES AND THE REMOVAL THEREOF It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to continue discussion of the regulation of outdoor advertising structures to the next regular meeting on August 4, 1980. Carried 5:0. 4e TAX ALLOCATION ON NEW ANNEXATIONS Councilman Edgar asked if the County resident, with the implementation of Proposition 13, pays a fire service differential fee over and above the 1% property tax. Dan Blankenship, City Administrator,' replied that the County residents do not yet pay a differential fee for fire service; but they do pay the structural fire fund portion of the property taxes, which are a portion of the 1%. Indications are that the County will be able to exist for one more year without levying a special benefit assessment to make up the difference of the property tax revenue. Basically, the County is funding the fire service approximately 50% with the Special District Augmentation Fund, assigned by the County Board. The County is seriously COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 7/21/80 considering the possibility of levying a benefit assessment for structural fire protection'to supplement the fund. Mayor Saltarelli asked that staff submit a report on this. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Council support the proposed compromise agreement. Carried 5:0. 5o PERSONNEL VACANCY - MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the filling of the vacancy of one Maintenance Man I in the Maintenance Department. Carried 5:0. RESOLUTION NO. 80-78 A Resolutipn of the City Council of the City of Tustin, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE DESIGNATION AND ADOPTION OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT REQUIRING THE REMOVAL OF POLES, OVERHEAD WL~ES AND ASSOCIATED OVERHEAD STRUCTURES WITHIN THAT AREA OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN LOCATED ON EL C~INO REAL BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND NEWPORT AVENUE, MAIN STREET FROM 290'+ WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL TO 1036'+ EAST OF EL CAMIN0 REAL AN--D ON NEWPORT AVENUE FROM THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY TO BONITA STREET WHICH AREA IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AND CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Resolution No. 80-78 be passed and adopted. Carried 5:0. VII. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 5:07 p.m. to the 7:30 p.m. meeting. Carried 5:0. MAYOR CITY CLERK by DEPUTY CITY CLERK MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL July 21, 1980 7:30 p.m. ~I. CALL TO ORDER The City Council meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:32 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Councilpersons: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Sharp Absent: Councilpersons: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Dan Blankenship, City Administrator Karen J. Beardsley, Deputy City Clerk Robert S. Ledendecker, City Engineer Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. White, community Services Director Ed Bushong, Finance Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Loni Hamblin, Finance Coordinator Dr. R. Kenneth Fleagle, Community Development Consultant III. PUBLIC HEARING 1. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 7/21/80 RESOLUTION NO. 80-77 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ADOPTING THE CITY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVEN-0E OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81. Mayor Saltarelli opened the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m. Seeing no one who wished to speak on this item, Mayor Saltarelli closed the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that, under Redevelopment funds, $250,000.00 be committed to the acquisition for parking in the downtown area; establishing a borrowing beyond that which was indicated in the budget with the understanding that, when the details of the tax increment availability are known, some of the under- grounding expenditure may be deferred. Carried 5:0. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to identify the storm drain projects as: (i) Main Street west of E1Camino Real; (2) Main Street east of Prospect Avenue; and (3) Sixth Street west of E1 Camino Real, and to allocate $275,000.00 under Redevelop- ment accommodating the practicality that the Engineering Department could have a portion of this project sub-contracted, with the direction that planning is expected to be done by April 1, 1981. Councilwoman Kennedy requested a comment from Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, in regard to priorities. Mr. Ledendecker responded that the Main Street projects would be the first two priorities, of equal importance, and the Sixth Street project would be third. He was in agreement with getting them done because (1) and (2) would be an integral part of the E1Camino Real street reconstruction area. Motion carried 5:0. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that $20,000 be budgeted from Community Services funds for the purpose of beautifying the island areas, between the northerly edge of Columbus-Tustin Park parking lot and the ballfield, by planting trees, grass and shrubs. Carried 5:0. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that an appropriate amount be budgeted from the Beautification Fund for the center island at Bryan Avenue and Main Street to beautify and significantly improve the safety at that intersection. Robert Ledendecker, City Engineer, said that it was staff's intention to combine this with the Newport center island project. Motion carried 5:0. eo It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Sharp, to increase the Police Department budget in the amount of $75,000 in order to hire two additional officers and to purchase two motorcycles specifically for traffic enforcement. fo Councilman Edgar requested a monthly report on ticket-writing in order to see the evidence of law enforcement in terms of tickets. Chief Thayer said this would be done. Councilwoman Kennedy asked for the estimated revenue that could be expected from these two additional units. Chief Thayer estimated revenues of $8,040 a month, or $96,480 annually, once the units are trained and on the road. Motion carried 5:0. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Sharp, to adjust the City Attorney's salary to $65 per hour, and the Deputy City Attorney's salary to $55 per hour; and that a maximum of $650 per month be credited toward Council Meetings. Carried 5:0.. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 7/21/80 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Resolution No. 80-77, with amendments approved at this meeting, bringing Total Appropriations, All Funds.to $12,759,006.00, be adopted.~ Carried 5:0. RESOLUTION NO. 80-72 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, DETER- MINING THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OP T~E AREA KNO~ AS "SAN JUAN-GREEN VALLEY ANNEXATION NO. 110 (REVISED)" TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA. Dr. Kenneth Fleagle, Community Development Consultant, reported that notices had been sent, notice of public hearing had been published and no written protests have been received. Staff recommended that, following the hearing, if no one files a written protest: Paragraph III of Resolution No. 80-72 be amended by inserting the word "no" in the two appropriate places; and Para- graph IV of Resolution No. 80-72 be amended by inserting Zero ("0") in the two appropriate places; and that Resolution No. 80-72 be adopted, making the annexation effective at such time as an agree- ment is reached with the County or is otherwise provided by State law. Mayor Saltarelli opened the Public Hearing at 8:07 p.m. Seeing no one who wished to speak on this item, Mayor Saltarelli closed the Public Hearing at 8:07 p.m. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Sharp, that Resolution No. 80-72 be adopted, with the inclusions recommended by Dr. Fleagle. Carried 5:0. IV. OTHER BUSINESS 1. CIVIC CENTER SITE IMPROVEMENTS - FILE #452 Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, said that the City Engineer has provided Council with a report on the alternatives and the cost of improvements, particularly the proposed block wall adjacent to the Police Department. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt staff's recom- mendation to revise the 6' 8" wall to provide four planter areas, curb and sidewalk, and to allocate the required funds ($6,173) for the project; and to authorize Mr. Blankenship to prepare a letter, including the proposed layout drawing, thanking Mr.DeIorio for his efforts. Carried 5:0. 2. PERSONNEL VACANCY - ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the filling of the vacancy of Administrative Secretary, as requested by Dan Blankenship, City Administrator. Carried 5:0. 3. MOTORCYCLE TRAFFIC COMPLAINT Councilman Hoesterey stated that he received a letter from a resident in the Peppertree tract regarding a problem with motorcycle traffic in the 'proposed Jamboree area' and a request to eliminate motorcycle access to that area. Mr. Hoesterey asked that staff attempt to find a solution to the problem and reply by letter to the complaintant. Council concurred. 4. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO FIRE ORDINANCE Councilman Edgar asked when he might expect the proposed ordinance which would require smoke detectors in multi-family units, and one that would relate to the fire potential of roof structures. Attorney Rourke said that he will check on the status of these recommended ordinances. 5. FREEWAY LANDSCAPING councilman Edgar asked that staff check with Cal Trans regarding a date of completion of freeway landscaping in Tustin. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 7/21/80 Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, said that he will investigate. 6. PROPOSED BIKE LAND UNDER SANTA ANA FREEWAY ON RED HILL AVENUE Councilwoman Kennedy asked if Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, has investigated the possibility of creating a bike lane in the Red Hill Avenue underpass at the Santa Ana Freeway. Mr. Ledendecker responded that he has been studying the possibilities and the costs of accomplishing this. He said that it would involve the removal of one wall but it is feasible. 7. NEW COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR Mayor Saltarelli welcomed Royleen White as Tustin's new Community Services Director. 8. LIMIT OF OCCUPANCY TO R-1 RESIDENCES Mayor Saltarelli mentioned that he was in receipt of a report from James Rourke, City Attorney, which responded to Kathy Weil's question regarding the limit of occupancy to R-1 residences. He directed staff to give a copy of the report to Kathy Weil. 9. FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION Mayor Saltarelli said that he received a report on the Fourth of July Celebration from Gary Napper, Administrative Assistant, and he re-emphasized his desire to include the same type of celebration in next year's budget.. Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, stated that this is in the 1980-81 budget. Vo ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 8:23 p.m. to the next regular meeting on August 4, 1980. Carried 5:0. MAYOR CITY CLERK by DEPUTY CITY CLERK