Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 07-21-80CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. RECESS MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way July 8, 1980 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 3:18 p.m. Present: Councilpersons: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Sharp Absent: Councilpersons: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Dan Blankenship, City Administrator Karen J. Beardsley, Deputy City Clerk ' Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Robert S. Ledendecker, City Engineer Gary Napper, Administrative Assistant Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Community Development Consultant Approximately 6 in the audience It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency at 3:19 p.m. Carried 5:0. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY July 8, 1980 1. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Saltarelli at 3:19 p.m. 2. Present: Members: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Sharp Absent: Members: None 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of June 16, 1980 meeting. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the Minutes of the June 16, 1980 meeting. Carried 5:0. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 3:20 p.m. to the City Council meeting. Carried 5:0. PUBLIC CONCERNS CONSENT CALENDAR CHAIRMAN RECORDING SECRETARY MINUTES OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 3:20 P.M. July 8, 1980 None. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - June 2, 1980 (typographical correction) June 16, 1980 Regular Council Meeting June 26, 1980 Regular Adjourned Meeting and Budget Workshop 2. APPRovAL OF DF24ANDS in the amount of $338,437.73. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $67,203.27. 3. SAFEWAY STORES V. COUNTY OF ORANGE, CITY OF TUSTIN, ET AL. Adoption of a Minute Order authorizing the defense of the City, in the matter of Safeway Stores V. County of Orange, City of Tustin, et al., by the Orange County Counsel's office as recommended by the City Attorney. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 80-62 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 80-1026. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-62, as recommended by the Community Development Department. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 7/8/80 5. RESOLUTION NO. 80-63 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, CHANGING DESIGNATIONS OF LAGUNA ROAD, FROM NEWPORT AVENUE TO EXISTING EL CAMINO REAL, TO EL CAMINO R~AL, AND EL CAMINO REAL, FROM THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY ON- RAMP TO LAGUNA ROAD, TO EL CAMINO WAY. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-63, as recommended by the Tustin City Council. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 80-64 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, PROCLAIMING THE TERMINATION OF A LOCAL E~RGENCY STATUS. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-64, as recommended by the City Administrator. 7. RESOLUTION NO. 80-65 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCREASE THEIR ALLOCA- TION OF FUNDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERSECTION OF BRYAN AVENUE AND BROWNING AVENUE AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EL MODENA-IRVINE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-65, as recommended by the Engineering Department. 8. RESOLUTION NO. 80-66 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-66, and assuming that no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion, authorize payment of the final 10% retention ($2,785.51) at that time, as recommended by the Engineering Department. 9. RESOLUTION NO. 80-67 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-67, and assUming that no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of recordation of the Notice 6f Completion, authorize payment of the final 105 retention ($4,130.34) at that time, as recommended by the Engineering Department. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 80-68 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10875. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-68, as recommended by the Community Development Department. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 80-69 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF CITY NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON- MANAGEMENT GENERAL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-69, as recom~aended by the City Management Negotiation Team and the City Administrator. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 80-70 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION AND TE~S OF EMPLOYMENT OF NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-MANAGEMENT SWORN POLICE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-70, as recommended by the City Management Negotiation Team and the City Administrator. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that the Consent Calendar be approved, except for Item No. 11 and Item No. 12. Carried 5:0. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 7/8/80 ITEM NO. 11 - RESOLUTION NO. 80-69 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION AND TERMS OF EMPLOYmeNT OF CITY NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-MANAGEMENT GENERAL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN. It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt Resolution No. 80-69, with salary adjustments for Public Works Inspector, Associate Planner and Senior Typist Clerk-Police, as recommended by the City Administrator. Carried 5:0. ITEM NO. 12 - RESOLUTION NO. 80-70 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF NON-ADMINISTRATIVE ~D NON-MANAGEMENT SWORN POLICE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No. 80-70, as recommended by the City Administrator. Carried 5:0. III. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 828 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF ARTICLE 4 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO NOISE CONTROL. Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, suggested the revision of the proposed ordinance, adding passages under Section 4617 Special Provisions which would allow residential maintenance activity that takes place between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m., if performed by the owner on the owner's residential property. ~!s. Kathy Weil, 1702 Summerville, Civic Liaison Director for Tustin Meadows, stated that the Tustin Meadows Homeowners Association has gone on record as opposing this ordinance because they feel that the Tustin City Code, California Penal Code, and Health and Safety adequately cover this area. She requested an explanation of what the adoption of this ordinance would accomplish. Mr. Brotemarkle pointed out that the primary purpose of the ordinance is to attempt to keep noises from intruding into residential areas from adjacent commercial and industrial areas. He added that this ordinance adopts a method by which the city can accurately measure noise and have a very good possibility of successfully prosecuting under a court case to make a particular noise cease. The only new portions of the code are the actual measurement factors. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 828 (re- vised) have first reading by title only. Carried 5:0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 828 by Karen J. Beardsley, Deputy City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar,. that Ordinance No. 828 (revised) be introduced. Carried 4:1, Saltarelli opposed. IV. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 831 An Ordinance of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTION 2603 CONCERNING THE PAYMENT OF FEES IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS FOR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that Ordinance No. 831 have second reading by title only. Carried 5:0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 831 by Karen J. Beardsley, Deputy City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that ordinance No. 831 be passed and adopted. Carried 5:0. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Sharp, Kennedy NOES: None COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 7/8/80 OLD BUSINESS 1. VI. NEW BUSINESS 1. VII. PUBLIC CONCERNS LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR TILLER DAYS STREET FAIR It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the purchase of General Liability Insurance for the Tustin Tiller Days Street Fair and the appropriation of $230 for the payment of the premium, as recommended by the Finance Department. Carried 5:0. AWARD OF BID - AHFP PROJECT NO. 939 & F07 CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS Bids for this project were opened on June 30, 1980 at 11:00 a.m. and were received as follows: H. A. Sessler, Inc.,Moorpark ................... $ 912,924.00 Belczak & Sons, Inc.,Orange .................... 922,971.00 K.E.C. Company, Corona ......................... 965,424.00 Pascal & Ludwig, Inc.,Upland ................... 983,420.00 J. D. Stine, San Bernardino .................... 1,055,172.00 Falcon Const. Corp.,Los Angeles ................ 1,084,646.00 ECCO Contractors, Inc.,Santa Ana ............... 1,175,468.00 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that the bid for the AHFP Project No. 939 & F07 Channel Flood Control Improvements be awarded to H. A. Sessler, Inc. of Moorpark, California in the amount of $912,924.00. Carried 5:0. RESOLUTION NO. 80-71 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION AND TERMS OF EMPLOY- MENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND MANAGEMENT OFFICERS, AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sattarelli, to adopt Resolution No. 80-71, with salary adjustments for the Assistant City Engineer, Police Captain, Assistant Planner, Community Development Director, and Finance Director, as recommended by the City Administrator; and a 3% special adjustment for the City Administrator, as well as placing him on the two-year compensation plan as provided depart- ment heads. Carried 5:0. RENT INCREASES Councilman Edgar introduced Jack Vetchell, 1651 Mitchell Avenue (Windsor Apartments). Mr. Vetchell brought to Council's attention the fact that tenants of this complex have had three separate rent increases in the past year. A number of tenants have been forced to move from this complex because of these increases. He expressed the hope that some 'moral pressure' could be brought a~ainst the apartment owners. Mayor Saltarelli noted that there had been two changes in ownership and said that every time there is a change in ownership the purchaser must pay market rates and interest to purchase the property, which would cause the rent to increase. Councilpersons Saltarelli and Kennedy suggested that staff prepare a letter from Council notifying the owner that the City Council heard someone speak relative to rent increases as a matter of public concern. Council concurred. VIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. 2o COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 7/8/80 AWARD OF BID - IMPROVE HVAC SYSTEMS, CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDINGS Bids for this project were opened on July 3, 1980 at 11:00 a.m. and were received as follows: Louis Schmetzer Co.,Tustin ..................... $ 59,575.00 Mr. Blankenship said that this item was contained in the 1979-80 Budget at a cost of about $28,400.00. This was the second bid opening for this project, the first being held on June 4, 1980, for which all bids were rejected by approval of the City Council. Some Councilmembers suggested that the project be advertised a third time, since the project may take until fall to complete. If re-bid, the project might be done during the winter months, when costs may be lower and the weather would be cooler. Police Chief Thayer said that the problem with air conditioning in the Police Department is severe. He agreed that he would like to get a lower bid, but they have been trying for two years to get the situation corrected and this is the first bid that has been received that is going to answer the problem. He felt that the project could be com- pleted in about 90 days and the more critical areas might be corrected first. Councilman Sharp asked for the cost/benefit ratio on spending the money for this project and an amortization schedule on the basis of saving energy. Dan Blankenship replied that staff had no figures, at this point, on the amount of energy saved in order to work out an amortization schedule. He stated that the proposed plan does, however, include criteria to make the system as economical as possible in addition to correcting the temperature problems. Councilman Hoesterey said that the more often we go out for bids, the fewer number of bidders we will have. By going out for bids a third time, he feels that we would either have a no-bid situation, or have one bid at a higher cost. Councilwoman Kennedy expressed concern that this is a "bandaid" project because 80% of the estimated cost is for labor, and the remaining $12,000 can't buy very much equipment; and that Louis Schmetzer, Co. is the firm that installed the equipment in the first place, and she is reluctant to have the same people that caused the problem come in and do the repairs. Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, replied that if it were not for their familiarity with the equipment, having installed it, we possibly would not have any bid at this time. He feels that the original design of the system was probably the failure of the architect rather than the installer; and the original installation, according to the specifications, was quite adequately performed. Chief Thayer said some of the equipment will be replaced and some will be repaired. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, that the bid for HVAC Improvements in City Hall and Police Department Buildings be awarded to Louis Schmetzer Co. in the amount of $59, 575.00, and to discuss the subject of labor and equipment warranty with the company's representative. Carried 4:1, Sharp opposed. FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION Councilwoman Kennedy commended the staff for their excellent handling of the Fourth of July Celebration and suggested that Council formally recognize Gary Napper and Holly Rossi, the Park and Recreation Staff, the Police Department, and the Tustin School District for their hard work, support and cooperation. Mayor Saltarelli and Councilman Edgar suggested the inclusion of the same type of celebration in next year's budget. Council concurred. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 7/8/80 IX. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn at 4:50 p.m. to an Executive Session for legal matters, thence to the 7:30 p.m. meeting. Carried 5:0. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. CITY CLERK by DEPUTY CITY CLERK MAYOR MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL July 8, 1980 7:30 p.m. The City Council meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Saltarelli. Present: Councilpersons: Saltarelli, Edgar, Kennedy, Hoesterey, Sharp Absent: Councilpersons: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Dan Blankenship, City Administrator Karen J. Beardsley, Deputy City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Robert S. Ledendecker, City Engineer Approximately 20 in the audience STOP SIGN REMOVAL, FIRST STREET BETWEEN'NEWPORT AND RED HILL AVENUES Robert Ledendecker, City Engineer, reported that a total of 225 questionnaires were sent to residents who would be directly affected by the removal of one or both of the subject stop signs on First Street between Newport and Red Hill Avenues. One-hundred- eighty-nine responses were recelved,'of which 15 (8%) were in favor of removing the stop sign at First Street and Charloma Drive; 18 (9.6%) were in favor of removing the stop sign at First Street and white Sands Drive; 41 (21.8%) were in favor of removing both stop signs; and 115 (61%) were against the removal of either stop sign. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:33 p.m. Charlie Martel, 13362 Coral Reef Road, spoke in opposition to the stop sign removal, noting that the inconvenience of starting and stopping is well worth the result. Frank Miller, 1291 East First Street, pointed out that there are three deaf people living in the general vicinity whose safety is reinforced by these stop signs. Dwight Brown, 1321 East First Street, said he would not have pur- chased his home had the stop signs not been there and he hoped that the will of the people would be recognized; and that if anything were to be done, he would prefer to have speed control dips put in on this street. He said that there is also a blind person living in the area, in addition to many children. Jerry Weil, 1702 Summerville, spoke in favor of removal of the stop signs because of the traffic pattern problem, and First Street is a natural way for across-town traffic to move. He said the City should take a look at the traffic pattern and how to get people from Red Hill Avenue to the other side of town. Gene Horner, 1351 East First Street, said he knows there is a traffic problem in the area but he believes that the safety of the children is most important. PUBLIC CONCERNS OTHER BUSINESS COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 7/8/80 Mary Cohen, who lives near one of the subject stop signs, also spoke in opposition to the removal of the stop signs. The Public Hearing was closed by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:44 p.m. Council concurred that no action is called for and the signs will stay as they are. CONSIDERATION OF 1980-81 CITY OF TUSTIN BUDGET (General Budget and Revenue Sharing) The Public Hearing was opened 7:48 p.m. Jerry Weil, 1702 Summervil!e, addressed Account #704, which deals with the youth program. After reviewing the Community Services section of the Budget, he noticed that the youth service area has no permanent, full-time employees, as opposed to the other operations who have a total of seven full-time employees (excluding Director of Community Services). He feels that this represents a lack of commitment by the City on a youth program, and he suggests that a full-time position be established in this program to attract and keep dedicated people in the program. The Public Hearing was closed by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:52 p.m. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Sharp, to continue the Public Hearing on the Consideration of the 1980-81 City of Tustin Budget to the next regular meeting on July 21, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. Carried 5:0. 'Councilman Hoesterey proposed that the next and final Budget Workshop be held on Monday, July 14, 1980 at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room. Council concurred and agreed to cancel the Wednesday, July 9, 1980 Budget Workshop. None. L. P. REPERTORY COMPANY, REQUEST FOR USE OF COMMUNITY BUILDING Councilman Edgar reported that he had received a request from Sarah Coleman, Managing Director of the L. P. Repertory Company, that the City be more organized in planning ahead to get a number of sequential days and to do the logistic planning necessary for their theatrical production. The posture that was used in this particular presentation was that there were no direct costs to the City and there were actually some cost benefits in terms of proportion of the receipts coming back. Mr. Edgar feels that there is a very clear need in Tustin for cultural facilities. He shares the Council's feelings that we do not want to be "whiplashed" by those (County people) who want to use us (City); yet, when we do have residents of the City who want to do something worthwhile, it is extremely appropriate to provide the support for them. The most productive of all ways is for volunteer people spending their own time, with no pay, to get some kind of encouragement through the City. Mr. Edgar asked that the city make a commitment for a time period sufficiently well in advance so thatgood planning can be done. Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, said he understands and appreciates the need for adequate planning. He thinks that it is necessary for Council to have a background report that provides adequate information upon which to make such a decision to commit a large number of days and staff time. He advised that Council delay action on this for one or two meetings in order to allow the Community Services Director an opportunity to get the staff reports, look at the situation, and come back with an analysis of the problem. Council concurred. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 7/8/80 ALLEY BETWEEN YORBA STREET AND ROSALIND DRIVE - NO PARKING SIGNS Councilman Edgar received a call from a neighbor regarding 'No Parking' signs in subject alley, criticizing that, by the existence of these signs, she had been obliged to park on Yorba Street, a heavily travelled arterial. The party asked why these signs were erected. Subsequently Mr. Edgar had talked to Chief Thayer, who said that the signs were to provide for Fire Lane safety. Mr. Edgar asked if there is an option that could be exercised to simplify this particular resident's requirements. Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, said that he had talked to the same person in regard to this matter. He said that staff will come back with a report on this matter. TUSTIN VILLAGE WAY Councilman Edgar said that several recommendations were made by Agent Johnson (Police Department) in terms of signs that could be posted on Tustin Village Way. One sign would clearly delineate the fact that if you turn off the freeway, you cannot go anyplace because Tustin Village Way is a dead-end street. The other is the redundant presentation of 25-mile-per-hour signs. Mr. Edgar requested that Council authorize the signs that Agent Johnson suggested. Chief Thayer said these signs seem very logical. Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, said that this should go through the Engineering Department. Mr. Edgar asked to have this item agendized for the July 21, 1980 meeting. Councilman Saltarelli asked staff to come back with a report on this. EL CAMINO REAL IMPROVEMENTS Councilman Edgar said it would seem appropriate to study whether or not the Jacobson Island is serving the purpose that is intended, and he requested an update of the report done on this about one or two years ago, including whatever accidents have occurred. He also urged that the report include input from the owner of E1 Camino Plaza, Mr. Zappas. Dan Blankenship, City Administrator,. said that early this year, City Council directed staff and the Downtown Advisory Committee to in- clude this as a review of the overall design of E1Camino Real. COLUMBUS-TUSTIN BASEBALL FIELD Councilman Hoesterey commented that the bleachers on the Columbus- Tustin field are covered with brick dust, as are the sidewalks. He requested that staff take a look at this. Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, said the property is that of the Tustin School District, however the City has some dual juris- diction. The school district is responsible for the maintenance of the grounds in general and the City assists with some extra work on the ball field because of the programs we conduct there. He said that staff will look into the problem and see if the bleachers could be cleaned periodically. 6. MYFORD ROAD Mayor Saltarelli said he wished to inform Council that he and Mr. Blankenship, Mr. Brotemarkle, Mr. Ledendecker and Mr. Edgar, repre- senting the Council, met with the Mayor, a Councilman and City Manager of Irvine and representatives of the Irvine Company relative to a joint position on a road alignment in the future that will relieve traffic problems of both cities. 7. SAN JUAN-GREEN VALLEY ANNEXATION NO. 110 (REVISED) Mayor Saltarelli said the subject annexation request has been approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission. The Public Hearing for this matter is scheduled for July 21, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. VI. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL MINb'i'~B Page 9, 7/8/80 It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn at 8:14 p.m. to an Executive Session for the purpose of discussing legal matters relative to the Tustin Water Works. Carried 5:0. CALL TO ORDER II. OTHER BUSINESS MAYOR CITY CLERK by DEPUTY CITY CLERK MINUTES OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 9:14 p.m. July 8, 1980 The Council Meeting was called to order at 9:14 p.m. by Mayor Saltarelli. 1. TUSTIN WATER WORKS It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to: 1) authorize James Rourke, City Attorney, to engage legal assistance as he deems necessary for the upcoming August 18, 1980 Public Hearing for the Public Utilities Commission. 2) authorize James Rourke, City Attorney, to draft a letter to be mailed to all recipients of the Tustin Water District (both in and out of the City) to present the facts; to repeat that there will be no dis- crimination (City vs. County); and to extract factual data that will indicate the rationality of some of the presentation that was made during the Public Hearing that was held on July 7, 1980. 3) authorize a letter to the Board of Supervisors, addressing the actions on the par= of Supervisor Miller, which is going around some of the other members of the Board in terms of support of the individuals opposed to the sale of the Tustin Water Works; and to identify to the Board of Supervisors the fact that the by-laws, as authorized by the Board of Supervisors for Santiago Municipal Advisory Council, are in conflict with the expressed policy that all Municipal Advisory Councils in the county not have power to represent, in a legal sense, the views of their constituents to state and other agencies. 4) appraise the East Orange County Water District of the fact that one of their directors has, in presentation, inaccurately portrayed his position as representing the East Orange County Water District. Mayor Saltarelli said he would like to expand it to any other agencies; that Council would send them letters relative to the City's position. Motion carried 5:0. L. P. REPERTORY COMPANY Councilman Edgar said that he spoke to Sarah Coleman before the City Council meeting reconvened this evening at 9:14 p.m. Ms. Coleman indicated that there is a potential conflict of dates for next spring, as far as the L. P. Repertory Company, and he wished to direct staff to hold in abayance any commitment of dates next spring for the possible use by L. P. Repertory Company, until Council has made a decision. Councilwoman Kennedy asked if we have a policy on this and she asked if staff could advise of requests that come in for those dates. Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, said that only certain organizations can request a time that is beyond three or six months. Council concurred that staff is to advise Council of any requests for those dates, and that parties interested in those dates be appraised of the situation so they could be notified of alternate action by the Council. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10, 7/8/80 III. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Saltarelli adjourned the meeting at 9:20 p.m. to a Workshop on the Budget on JUly 14, 1980 at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, and thence to the next regular meeting on Monday, July 21, 1980. MAYOR CITY CLERK by DEPUTY CITY CLERK