Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 06-16-80CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. PUBLIC HEARINGS IV. RECESS MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way June 2, 1980 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 3:15 p.m. Present: Councilpersons: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Sharp, Kennedy Absent: Councilpersons: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney (arrived at 3:18) Dan Blankenship, City Administrator Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Frank Semelsberger, Police Agent Russ Churchman, Acting Park & Recreation Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Gene Snyder, Public Services Assistant Gary Napper, Administrative Assistant Dr. Ken Fleagle, Community Development Consultant About 12 in the audience None It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Hoesterey, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency at 3:16 p.m. Carried. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 2, 1980 1. The maeting was called to order by Chairman Saltarelli at 3:16 p.m. 2. Present: Members: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Sharp, Kennedy Absent: Members: None 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of May 19, 1980 meeting It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the minutes of the May 19, 1980 meeting. Carried 5-0. 4. REPORT ON EL CAMINO REAL UTILITY UNDERGROUND DISTRICT NO.5 No action was taken at this time. 5. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 3:20 p.m. to the City Council meeting. Carried. CHAIRMAN PUBLIC CONCERNS RECORDING SECRETARY MEETING OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 3:20 P.M. June 2, 1980 "NO RIGHT TURN ON RED" SIGN - RED HILL AND BRYAN AVENUES Bonnie Perkins, 13382 Epping Way, read a letter addressed to the Council during the Planning Agency meeting and presented a petition requesting replacement of the "No Right Turn on Red" sign at the intersection of Bryan and Red Hill Avenues. Residents in the immediate area feel that the recent removal of this sign causes a serious hazard to pedestrians, mostly children and students. COUNCIL MIND'i',:S Page 2, 6-2-80 Mayor Saltarelli suggested that Council receive the letter and petition. He asked to have this matter agendized for a Public Hearing on June 16, 1980, a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, at 7:30 p.m., and also requested that Staff look into the possibility of having the right turn prohibited only at certain hours. Council concurred. II. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 19, 1980 2. APPI%OVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $652,992.69. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $69,214.64. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 80-54 4e A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AHFP PROJECT NO. 939 AND F07 CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS Adoption of Resolution No. 80-54, as recommended by the Engineering Department. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF BONDS - TRACT NO. 10563 III. ORDINANCES FOR INTRO- DUCTION Acceptance of all public improvements within Tract No. 10563 and authorize the release of the following bonds: Bond No. 2050-14-051204, Faithful Performance - $20,700.00; Bond No. 2050-14-051204, Labor and Materials - $10,350.00; and Bond No. 2050-15-051204, Monumentation - $1,500.00. It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy, that the Consent Calendar be approved. Carried 5-0. None IV. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 829 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 611 WHICH AMENDS THE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT' REGULATIONS FOR THE TUSTIN/IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 829 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 829 by Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk, it was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 829 be passed and adopted. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Sharp, Kennedy NOES: None 2o ORDINANCE NO. 828 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF ARTICLE 4 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO NOISE CONTROL It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 828 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 828 by Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 828 be passed and adopted. Vo OLD BUSINESS COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 6-2-80 Mr. E. Go Brickson, Division of Environmental Health of Orange County, explained noise levels and the effects of Ordinance No. 828. He said the City of Tustin would retain the County's services at a cost of $20.00 per month, with additional charges at a rate of $22.00 per hour for actual time spent in the field. He believes this would be an advantage over the use of a private consultant, whose charge would be approximately $50.00 to $60.00 per hour. Retaining the County's services would provide the city with an expert witness in the event of a court situation. ~ Kathy Weil, 1702 Summerville, spoke in opposition to this ordinance on behalf of the Tustin Meadows Community Association. Mayor Saltarelli and Councilmen Edgar and Hoesterey agreed that the adoption of this ordinance would tend to make all residents of Tustin in possible violation of the law, thus establishing a level of bureaucracy which is not needed in Tustin, and resulting in serious problems with the public. Councilwoman Kennedy asked how many other cities have adopted this ordinance. Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, said that thirteen Orange County cities have adopted it, with the ramaining cities still undecided on the issue. Councilwoman Kennedy asked whether Tustin could elect to take advantage of the service at any time, or if this is a one-time offer. Mr. Brickson replied that the City could elect, at the end of any fiscal year, to contract with the Board of Supervisors, for this service. Councilwoman Kennedy suggested that possibly the ordinance could be revised in order to delete sections that some members of the Council consider too restrictive. Mike Brotemarkle stated that the first part of Ordinance No. 828 is the County Ordinance and the second part is made up of sections of the existing Tustin City Code, which we currently have no way of enforcing. A substitute motion was made by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to continue this item for 30 days in order for staff to point out areas of the ordinance which are contained in our present ordinance and those which are in the County ordinance, and to answer Council's concerns. Carried 5-0. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 830 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING SECTION 3513 (b) OF TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO BURGLARY AND ALARM SYSTEMS (Urgency Ordinance) It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 830 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 830 by Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 830 be introduced. Carried 5-0. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 830 have second reading by title only. Carried~5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 830 by Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 830 be passed and adopted as an urgency measure. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Sharp, Kennedy NOES: None 1. DENIAL OF LICENSE TO SELL CONCEALABLE FIREARMS, TO APPLICANT DENNIS LEE BARBER COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 6-2-80 VI. NEW BUSINESS 1. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy that the appeal of Dennis Lee Barber to sell concealable firearms be denied and the City Clerk notify the applicant. Carried 5-0. 2. TUSTIN TILLER DAYS PARADE 2e It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey that the City provide funds not to exceed $2,500 for expenses including trophies, judges and miscellaneous; and that only those equestrian units with significant parade experience, i.e. 6 parades in the last 12 months, and good safety records be admitted as entries, and these entries, with the exception of military units, will be required to prove insurance coverage of at least $1,000,000 and sign a statement relieving the City and t}!e Jaycees of any liability for their entries. Carried 5-0. PROPOSED LAGUNA ROAD NAME CHANGE Elmer Loy, Tustin Fix-It Shop, 217 E1 Camino Real, spoke in favor of the name change from a businessman's point of view. Agnes Bacon, 140 Mountain View Drive, spoke in opposition to the name change fQr historical reasons. It was moved by Kennedy,. seconded by Sharp, to adopt Resolution No. 80-52, setting a date for a Public Hearing on June 16, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. and giving notice thereof. Carried 5-0. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO FILL VACANCIES IN THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT (FOR PERSONNELANALYST) AND IN THE MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT (FOR TREE TRIMMER) It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy to approve the filling of the vacancy of one Personnel Analyst in the Per- sonnel Department and one Tree Trimmer in the Maintenance Department. Carried 5-0. STOP SIGN REMOVAL - FIRST STREET BETWEEN NEWPORT AND RED HILL AVENUES It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to set a date for Public Hearing on July 8, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. and to give notice thereof. Carried 5-0. 4. TRAFFIC CONTROL - SILVERBROOK DRIVE AND COPPERFIELD DRIVE AREA No action was taken on this matter. Council to review in 4 or 5 months. Council concurred. 5. REMOVAL OF ON-STREET PARKING ON CARROLL WAY It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy to authorize the removal of on-street parking on both sides of Carroll Way, between 17th Street and Medford Avenue, and on Medford Avenue, between Carroll Way and Yorba Street. Carried 5-0. 6. REQUEST TO FILL SERGEANT'S VACANCY IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the filling of one Sergeant's position in the Police Department and to authorize corresponding funding. Carried 5-0. 7. POSSIBLE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Kathy Weil, 1702 Summerville, liaison for Tustin Meadows Com- munity Association, spoke in favor of the re-establishment of the Planning Commission. Mayor Saltarelli and Councilmen Sharp and Edgar agreed that, having had experience with a separate Planning Commission in the past, the Council is much more efficient, financially and politically, without the separation. VII. OTHER BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL MINbT~S Page 5, 6-2-80 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to direct staff to study what is going on today in other cities in the area of planning commissions. Motion failed 2-3, Saltarelli, Edgar and Sharp opposed. FIRST COUNCIL MEETING IN JULY - DATE CHANGE It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy, to change the first Council Meeting in July to Tuesday, July 8, 1980. Carried 5-0. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH TUSTIN POLICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve in concept the Memorandum of Understanding with the Tustin Police Employees Association and authorize staff to prepare the necessary implementing documents and resolutions, and direct staff to prepare for implementation of the June 30, 1980 salary and benefits. Carried 5-0. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REQUEST FOR MEETING WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, said the Chamber of Commerce requested that City Council members meet informally with the Chamber Board on June 19, 1980 from 4:30 to 6:00 p.m. in the Chamber Office. Council members will notify Dan Blankenship on whether they can attend. Council concurred. BUDGET Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, reported that the Gann Initiative, Proposition 4, has caused some complications, however the budget should be ready in about 7-10 days to be submitted to the Council. Mr. Blankenship also stated that the general fund is in a healthy state, due to high interest rates, sales tax and miscellaneous other sources. The Redevelopment Agency has received $350,000 more than expected. Councilman Edgar asked if, since we intended to do some FAU projects this year but could not, can we do them next year? Mr. Blankenship responded that we can not get any credit for those projects. PLAQUES FOR GIFTS TO ASSEMBLYMEN OR CONGRESSMEN Councilman Edgar asked if staff would look into the possibility of having plaques made for the City of Tustin to give as gifts to Assembly Members or Congressmen. Council concurred. SIGNING TO ATTRACT PEOPLE TO DOWNTOWN AREA Councilman Edgar also suggested that, regardless of what happens in regard to the proposed Laguna Road name change, a meaningful signing should be done to attract people to the Downtown area, and he asked that staff do a study on this. Council concurred. CONGRATULATIONS. TO GARY NAPPER AND ROY GONZALES Councilwoman Kennedy offered congratulations to Gary Napper on his graduation magna cum laude from Cal State Long Beach with a Masters Degree in Public Administration. Council concurred. Councilwoman Kennedy offered congratulations to Roy G°nzales on his promotion to the position of Personnel Director. Council concurred. It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy, to adjourn at 5:32 p.m. to the next regular meeting on June 16, 1980. Carried 5-0. MAYOR CITY CLERK