HomeMy WebLinkAboutNB 4 PADS 1980-81 BUDGET 3-3-80~DATE:
FEBRUARY 26, 1980
NEW BUSINESS
3-3-80
I e.r-Corn
TO:
fl%tEMBEES OF TilE CITY COUNCIL
,STEPILEN :L. SCHUSTER, DELEGATE TO PADS
5~B~fCT: ;.PTJIILIC ,~iGE:NCIES DATA :SYSTEMS (, ]~ADS ) 19,8~0~81 ,:BUDGET AND
~DECENTRALIZAT ION PLAN.
On ~'ebruary 21, 1980, the PADS Board of Directors unanimously approved a
plan for decentralizing PADS data processin'g operations and the tentative
budget for FY 1980-81. Attached is a report from Dan Blankenship to me
which explains the background.
I re~:ommend that our city support the decentralization plan and tentative
budget for several reasons.
1. It is the lowest cost alternatiw~ which affords the
ability to add systems at very little operational cost.
2. Ir gives the city the best response time and turn around
service while eliminating driving to pick up reports.
i~ reduces the city's dependence on PADS to program main-
~nance a~d ~opzional systems development so!that the city
could continue ~o operate even if ~PED$'folded or the city
chose~Zo te~ve membership.
· ~,~e PADS ~ssaff is kept relatively small and not burdened
~,~i~h sn~ervision ~of Operational personnel.
5. 'The purchase of equipment will improve the city's
position under proposition 4 which limits budget growth.
Centralization (central facility housing a large computer or several
compubers to do-the actual work) is not really an alternative because of
,many reasons and ~he fact that Fountain Valley must decentralize from an
economics standpoinz. They save significant funds over the cost of the
centralized operations.
If we are to decentralize, then we need to acquire a larger printer than
we included in the current budget, and we also need a check imprinter,
bursters and related equipment. The cost of this equipment above the
$3,450 included in the budget is $9,935, according to the attached
memorandum from Ed Bushong.
Yime is of the essence since the sooner PADS can phase out its operational
staff and focus on programming and delivering the systems it has sold, the
better the cities.will be and the less unnecessary pressure on the PADS
staff. In addition to the costs shown, there will also be some building
modification costs which will depend upon the computer which our city
~ultimately accepts. The equipment recommended to be purchased now will /
PADS ~80-81 BUDGET AND DECENTRALIZATION PLAN
PAGE TWO
actually reduce the $22,000 per year lease payment by 15% to 20% by re-
.~uci~g :the amount of the lease. It may later be recommended to pay cash
~Tor the :computer itsel~f and,eliminate the annual lease payments entirely.
.~t is thereTore recommended:
1. Council approve the decent~alizecl concept for PADS
,~n:d the$249,430 PADS budget.
.~°uncil,~pp~ove T~stin's $29,000 share of the PADS
budget for 1980-81 and authorize a supplemental appro-
priation for part of the city's equipment in the current
fiscal year.
o
The Council indicate a willingness to accept the
larger Series 3 computer at the same cost as the
smaller ~iodel 33 computer.
Sincerely Yours,
Stephen L. Schuster
Mayor
SLS/eab
~February 26,
Dan ~BlaD~kenship, City .Admini~str.
~I/:~T 'CO:S T .FOR ~OTE ~JOB ~Pl~OCES'SI NG
'As approved by the PADS Board of Directors at their last
meeting, the City of Tustin will assume the computer
· operational responsibilities during the month of April,
1980. This mode' of operation will require the immediate
purchase of th~ computer output processing equipment that
.will ~ltimately be needed when the Tustin in-house computer
is installed sround August or September, 1980.
The .equipment required now is as follows:
! - 'Printronix 3:00 line per minute, line printer
with sta~d, paper rack & sound ;:cover
$ 7,025
Used Burster-Imprinter ~for signin~ checks
arid se.Da.rating/staCking
$ 5,300
]. - Used deuOl~aor to:separate multiple part
~repo~t$ ;a'nd checks
$ 1,060
TOTAL $13,385
Le~s ~ri~n%er :funded in ~FY 79/80 ~udget $ 3,450
Net additional appropriation $ 9,935
The printer has a 90 day warranty and the burster/imprinter
~and~decollatGr have a 60 day warranty so no service agree-
'ment will be necessary this fiscal year. Next fiscal year
the service agreements will be as follows:
Printronix Printer
Burster/Imprinter
Decollator
$950/annual
$350/annual
$ 75/annual
It should be noted that the area presently occupied by the
Administrative Assistant will be required for this addition
of.equipment to the Finance Department. Also some electrical
;modification will be necessary as the area is already under-
powered and several extension cords are in use which create
an unsafe condition.
DATE:
FEBRUARY 19, 1980
TO: STEPHEN L. SCHUSTER, DELEGATE TO PADS
FRO~: DAN BLANKEI~SHIP, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
SUB,~[CT: FADS~B~)GET ~.AND METHOD OF OPERATION
A major decision is now before the PADS Board of Directors on the method by
whiCh the PADS organization will operate and provide data processing service
to our City and the other members. This decision will also directly affect
tee 1980-81 PADS budget.
EXI~STI~ OPERATION
At the present time, PADS has 8½ regular employees and is operating a computer
in-a cen%ral service bureau mode while also providing systems maintenance sup-
port,anaL systems development staff.
About ~-,; years ago, the PADS Board decided that the central computer would no
longer ;e "beefed up," but that the plan would be to decentralize the opera-
tiona' : ..... '
~ ~3on while maintaining the centralized programming staff for the
mainm£;~n:e and de,.el;:ment functions. The current year's budget included a
secon: z.~.~eu~er tcca~e~ in Fountain Valley, reflecting this philosophy of using
smalie' :;mputers ;~at can be moved into the member cities (Brea, Placentia,
Tustin, Fc;ntain Valley) rather than adding extra equipment on the central machine.
DECEh, x.-.~_:Z,~TIO ,1 xD'~xi~l ~Aor_S
The dssentralization decision was based on the basic reasons shown on Annex B.
Also, a~y city operating police systems will find significant advantages in not
being v~inerable to telephone lines tied to a central computer, nor to a lack of
security for the computer and files. The cost advantages of decentralization
are especially strong for the larger city or the city operating many systems. A
city operating only the basic payroll, finance and business license systems has
a marginal cost benefit but does have some operational advantages.
COMPARISOi~ OF COSTS
The following is a brief comparison of costs which are drawn from the detail
contained in Annex A and Annex B:
S1;e~phen L. Schuster, Del-egate to PADS
~Re: -PADS bu~l§.et and met. hod of ~operation
February 19, 19SD
Page 2
1979'80
'Bud.get
lg80-81 Budget
Gentralized Decentralized
~.~talPADS~B~dget
~n-member Costs
PADS Member Costs
4 Cities Direct Cost
Total Member Costs
City of Tustin's Share
~$415,627 '$456~670 $'249;430
126,268 125,000 125,000
$289,359 $331,670 $124,430
-0- -0- 167,950
$289,359 $331,67D S292,380
$ 59,582 $ 68,292 $ 66,300
Tustin's share of the decentralized approach is 11.3% above the current year's
bu~ge: but 3.0% less than the centralized approach. Being one of the smaller
~cities,,we do not benefit in cost as greatly from decentralization as the larger
citie:, er cities presently operating large water billing activities (Brea and
Foungai~ :V&lley), thus an 11.3% increase, when Total Member Costs are up only
1.0~.
~.,_ ~_. .......... ~ on cost includes a one,year assessment of $8,000 to
Tus~--<'_~,O~n ~or !il four cities), which will drop our second-year cost by
roL~'~c=iy ~nat amo~n.~ amd we will have the right to option out of participation
in t~<~se:ond an~ subsequent years systems development program, which represents
abou~ ~ ~
e~,OOu (SLO,O00 for all four cities.) In addition, after five years of
.le~se ~rchase computer pa~ents, or if we have paid off the principal amount
~arl ~ ,
,=: the Ciiy's annual cost will decrease about $22,000. If all of these op-
tions weme pursued, our annual cost in today's dollars would represent about
S~6_ ,300, for paper, computer maintenance, systems maintenance from PADS, and the
equivalent of Dna-quarter of an employee for operating the computer and printer.
The J ' '
ad~tlon of systems development ($10,000), if approved by the Council when the
systems development program was established by the PADS Board, would only increase
the cost to $36,300, or 54,8% of the 80-81 cost ($66,300).
RECOMMENDATION
Due ~o the advantages of decentralization,the ability~to add systems at Tittle
increases cost, the ability to stabilize and decrease costs, and the greater con-
trol; Ed Bushong and I recommend that Tustin support the decentralization plan
at the PADS Board and to our City Council. Centralization will have a higher price
and less fle×ibility.
Stephen L. Schuster, Delegate to PADS
Re: PADS budget and method of operation
February 19, 1980
Page 3
IMPACT OF PADS SALES TO OTHERS
PADS has.become~very%successful this year.as sales and/or contracts with
others repPeserrt ~0.~4% ($126,268 of $415,627~) of the PADS budget, compared
with only 7.9% in FY T978-79. These sources represent an estimated 27.4%
of the PADS budget for FY 1980-81 in the centralized mod~or 29.9% in the
decentralized mode, including direct member cities costs. PADS has sold
systems to Mountain View, Azusa, E1Centro an~apparentl~West Covina, this
year, and several other sales are already in the works for next year. These
sales are allowing costs to be controlled while allowing PADS to maintain a
larger staff less subject to the effects of turn-over. These sales are also
bringing in systems development funds for systems in which our cities may be
interested.
DEVELOPMENT OF POLICE SYSTEM
The ~ staff is presently developing a police system which should be helpful
in hz!Lin§ down clerical increases in the future as well as giving the depart-
ment be:ter access to their data on detecting trends and likely crime areas.
This ,~id be most feasible with the decentralized computer due to greater re-
liab~'i~ly and~e.curity.
The c~a] ~f participating in the system will be $6,000 for systems development
~ext year and ~he cos~ of the equipment in the Police Department. There would
be n~ acded com?u~er cost, although we would assign part of the Finance Depart-
ment '~ computer costs to the Police Department to distribute the cost more fairly.
~We v~iil ~e working with the Police Department to develop a request to the City
Council for the funding.
CHOICE OF COMPUTER
,Under the decentralized plan, the City of Tustin would have a PIodel 33 Hewlitt-
Packard, which is a small but more than adequate sized mini-computer. However,
PADS needs to have on of the cities accept the larger Series 3 Model we have as
the central computer at the PADS office. This avoids having to buy a new com--
puter and makes available one that the PADS staff can use for systems development
o~er telephone lines. Tustin is the ideal city for this arrangement, since we
are the closest to the PADS office and telephone costs will be lower. The City
would receive a much larger, faster computer at the same cost as we would pay for
the smaller computer. The key issue will be finding space for the computer, which
probably could be located in the City Hall basement. This will require some con-
struction cost in order to erect a wall for dust protection and air conditioning
for cooling and moisture control. We would like to have your concurrence in accept-
ing the larger computer.
Stephen L. Schuster, Delegate to PADS
~Re: PADS budget and method of operation
· Pebruary 19, 1980
~age 4
CONCLUSION
~Ed-~Bushoog~,and I recom,~ndyoursupport,of~the~Uecent'~alized~PADS~budget
and-conc~rmence in T. ustin~accepting the l~r§er computer if~adequate space
can be made available in the basement.
Respectfully submitted,
Dan Blankenship
City Administrator
,DB/hlr
Attachments
N
O0
000 0 0 CD
000 (CD 0 0
000 0 0 ~'-
090,.)00
05 tO U") t..O kC)
CO ,-- ,-- 0'~
020
cOO r~
o'10 COCO
r-'O
Annex A
L~
ga_
or.- ~ I:::
U Ir' ~
PUBLIC AOENC~S DATA=S~STEi~
l. ~all'to'~rd~r
2. Approval of Minutes
T~e~surer',.s Report
ACTION ITEMS
4. Approval of Adjustment to 1979-80 Budget~
~he lg79~80 Budget of $.3'89,057 ~eeds to be increased to S.1:~,,627
provide for part-time help, the $10,000 Entrex settlement, a provision
,t~.~ will not require
'for video-taping training, and other minor cosls.
addition, al -funds from member c'iti'es.
'5. ]Z~m~mval .c'f ~qid;Year Salary Adjastme~t.s
S;aiary leN~el=s in the data processing field are rising quite rapidix,
~ .... po~n~ that adjustments are merited and necessary te avoid further
~n~.~ver. ~he ~pe~al~ons Committee ~ecomn~ends ap~royal of .certain in-
A~roval of Tentative Budget for 19~:~0-91 and Related Policy Decisions
The :decision on the basic methed of operatinq daLa ',~'~,
. sy~ .... and tentaLive
i~=~OuS1 b~dget is now ~i~propriate. AFter Bmard~actiDn, each city ~ili
me'ed .to go back and get Council authorization to
c,)m,,~% ~o the tentative
budget and related policies.
SI~, ~S REPORTS
7. Ent~ex and General Automation
These suits have both been resolved.
,:qar ket 1
OT~.~E'R .-BUSINESS
Scheduled adjournment prior to 6:30'p.m.
CITY OF TUSTIN COST (PADS)
(In constant dollars)
Dan Blankenship
2/20/80
S 8O
70
6o
5O
4O
3O
2O
lO
79-80
81 82 83 84 85 86
a. b. ,c. d. e. f.
a. 1st sear of decentralization including one-time cost of
S~,~SC for Tustin ($66,300)
b. 2nd year of decentralization excluding one-time cost of
tst year ($58,300)
c-e Same as 2nd year (,$58,300)
f. 6th year of decentralization-computer paid off ($36.300) 37.7~'~
reduction
~bove based on
Paying systems development of $10,000 each year
2. Disregards system development reduced computer cost after
computer paid for in year "c"
3. Year "b" through "e" has 37.7% not subject to inflation for
computer payment.
4. Disregards normal inflation
5. Disregards increased efficiency as new systems are added at
same cost.
Dan Blankenship ..
2/20/80
BREAKDOWN OF EXISTING LOANS
(Payable After 6-'30,80)
~A¢~K OF WHITTI£R
-~o$177,000
-84,000*
$ 93,000
- 22,744
$ 70,256
+ 6,000
S 76;256
- 60,O00
'After 6~30-80
Principal ~& Interest
Principal Only
Charge to Tustin (or?).equivalent new computer
Remainder
Sell to Cities
$"8,000 burster-signers (2)
$10,000 printer charge to Brea or Placentia
as part of computer system
$ 4,744 4 Adds Regent lO0 CRTS
Assume by PADS
Interest on $70,256
Less $20,000 for 3 years by system development
$ 1:6,2'5 ~
~4~K OF AMF. R:CA
S123,322.70
- 16;020:8t
ST07,~01.89
7,000.00
S100,301=89
- 84,000.00 *
S 16,301.89
- 17,000.00
Responsibility ofmembers IF not paid off by sales-
includes $42,000 for 3 ea. 50 MB Disc drives which
'could be sold as well.
Principal & Interest
Interest
Principal
Discount Due (7%)
Charge to Fountain Yalley equivalent new computer
Charge to Brea or Placentia as part of computer
system -- the 120 )IB DISC drive
GraphiCs printers for police system development
free and clear,
* Does not include sales tax of $5,040.00