HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE MOFFETT DRIVE BRIDGE AND ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIP NO. 70224• Agenda Item 9
AGENDAREPORT Reviewed: —
City Manager
Finance Director
MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2017
TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER
FROM: DOUGLAS S. STACK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE MOFFETT DRIVE BRIDGE AND ROADWAY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIP NO. 70224
SUMMARY
Staff is recommending that the City Council award the construction contract for the Moffett Drive
Bridge and Roadway Construction Project, CIP No. 70224 to the lowest responsive /
responsible bidder, USS Cal Builders, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Deny the bid protest submitted by SEMA Construction, Inc.;
2. Award the construction contract for Moffett Drive Bridge and Roadway Construction
Project, CIP No. 70224 to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder, USS Cal Builders,
Inc., in the amount of $5,732,024.04 and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to
execute the contract documents on behalf of the City; and
3. Appropriate $332,624 from the Capital Improvement Program — General Fund (Fund
200) and $867,376 from the MCAS Tax Allocation Bonds Fund (Fund 561).
FISCAL IMPACT
The total estimated expenditure for the construction of this project is $7,100,000. The project is
funded through MCAS Tax Allocation Bonds with a current budget of $5,900,000. Staff is
requesting an appropriation of funds in order to award the contract. As part of the project the
City will be installing infrastructure for the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) in the amount of
$332,624. The cost associated with this work will be reimbursed by IRWD. The remaining
unfunded balance is $867,376, which staff is recommending be appropriated from MCAS Tax
Allocation Bonds (Fund 561). The current fund balance for Fund 561 is $17,951,000.
Project expenditures include:
• Construction Contract...................................................................$ 5,732,024.04
• Geotechnical Engineering and Materials Testing ...........................$ 148,000.00
• Construction Management and Inspection ...................................$ 439,000.00
• Construction Engineering.............................................................$ 150,000.00
• Contingency.................................................................................$ 630,975.96
• Total Estimated Expenditures...................................................$ 7,100,000.00
Award Contract for Moffett Drive Bridge
February 21, 2017
Page 2
CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN
The Project will extend Moffett Drive from 500 feet east of Downs Road to 600 feet west of
Meridian Way. The Project contributes to the fulfillment of the City's Strategic Plan Goal A:
Economic and Neighborhood Development. Specifically, the Project implements Strategy 1, by
furthering the development of critical phases of Tustin Legacy.
DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-45 approving the plans and specifications and
authorized and directed the City Clerk to advertise for Project bids on September 20, 2016. The
Project will extend Moffett Drive from +/- 500 feet east of Downs Road to +/- 600 feet west of
Meridian Way, through construction of a bridge over Peters Canyon Channel and includes
roadway, storm drain, sidewalk, and landscape improvements, as well as installation of
domestic water and reclaimed water for the Irvine Ranch Water District. The Project was
advertised and the bids were opened on November 8, 2016 and evaluated. The City Council on
December 20, 2016, rejected all bids received on the Project and directed the City Clerk to
return all bid bonds and re -advertise for bids. The project was subsequently advertised and the
formal bids were opened on February 7, 2017 and evaluated. Bid packages were purchased by
25 companies.
Seven (7) bids were received by the noticed deadline and are summarized as follows:
• USS Cal Builders, Inc....................................................................$
5,732,024.04
• SEMA Construction, Inc................................................................$
6,309,434.11
• KEC Engineering...........................................................................$
6,543,838.40
• Flatiron West, Inc..........................................................................$
6,768,233.00
• MCM Construction, Inc..................................................................$
6,857,284.00
• Reyes Construction, Inc................................................................$
6,935,764.00
• Steve P. Rados, Inc.......................................................................$
7,270,860.00
Staff has reviewed the references and verified the State Contractor's License for USS Cal
Builders, Inc., and has determined that they are in good standing and current.
The City received a formal bid protest dated February 10, 2017 from SEMA Construction, Inc.
(SEMA), the apparent second lowest bidder. In the protest SEMA requested that the City find
the apparent lowest bidder, USS Cal Builders, Inc., non-responsive. SEMA asserted that USS
Cal Builders failed to list a subcontractor or subcontractors for items of work that are valued in
excess of one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the total bid price in violation of the bid documents.
SEMA alleges that USS Cal Builders should have listed a subcontractor or subcontractors to
perform the work needed for bid items numbers 23 and 24 as they are not capable of self -
performing the work and the total value of the work for the two bid items is more than 0.5% of
the total bid price. Staff, along with the City Attorney's Office, has reviewed and investigated the
matter and determined that SEMA's protest is without merit.
Public Contract Code section 4104 provides that a general contractor must list a subcontractor
who will perform work on a public works project the value of which exceeds one-half of one
percent of the prime contract's bid. If no such subcontractor is listed, the prime contractor must
self -perform the work in question. In addition, if the value of the work in question does not
exceed one-half of one percent, the prime contractor is not obligated to list a subcontractor for
that scope of work.
Award Contract for Moffett Drive Bridge
February 21, 2017
Page 3
City staff requested USS Cal Builders to provide a response to SEMA's assertions. USS Cal
Builders' response adequately addresses the issues raised by SEMA. USS Cal Builders
explained that they will self -perform the work in connection with bid item number 24. On the
face of the bid documents, there is nothing legally preventing USS Cal Builders from self -
performing this work (i.e., licensing issues) and the City, therefore, has no basis to dispute this
response. As to bid item number 23, USS Cal Builders explained that they will purchase the
materials direct and subcontract out the labor- the value of which will not exceed one-half of one
percent. Moreover, staff noted that the value of bid item number 23 does not exceed one-half of
one percent of the total bid price so there is no requirement to list a subcontractor for the work
contained therein; further verification from USS Cal Builders supporting the response therefore
was not needed as determined by staff and the City Attorney's Office.
The information above is a summary of the bid protest and the City's response. The bid protest
and the formal response from the City have been included as attachments to this report.
It is recommended that the City Council deny the bid protest by SEMA Construction, Inc., award
the construction contract to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder, USS Cal Builders, Inc.,
and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the contract documents on behalf of the
City, and appropriate $332,624 from the Capital Improvement Program — General Fund (Fund
200) and $867,376 from the MCAS Tax Allocation Bonds Fund (Fund 561).
rStacK, N.L.
Public Works/City Engineer
Attachment(s): 1. SEMA Construction, Inc. Letter Dated February 10, 2017
2. City Response to Bid Protest
3. Location Map
4. Bridge Design Perspectives
SACity Council Items12017 Council Items\02-21-2017Wward Contract -Moffett Drive Bndge Construction (70224)Wward of Contract for Moffett Drive Bridge Construction (70224).docx
ATTACHMENT 1
SEMA Construction, Inc. Letter Dated
February 10, 2017
February 10, 2017
DOUGLAS S. STACK, P.E.,
Director Department of Public Works
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
(714) 573-3150
Via Hand Delivery
FEB 10 2017
USS Cal Builders failed to list subcontractors for items of work valued in excess of
one-half of one percent (0.596) of their total bid. Per the attached 'Bid Opening
"oavy and Highway
General Contractors
Summary Report' USS Cal Builders did not list an Asphalt Paving Subcontractor as
needed for bid Items #23 & #24, USS Cal Builders does not self perform these items
320 Gowwd Way
of work as they list Asphalt Pavers on a regular basis to perform these items of work
suge 150
on other contracts. These items exceed 0.5% of USS Cal Builders total bid of
kvkv
$5,732,024.04.
9co261omia
8
Item #23 Asphalt Rubberized Hot Mix (ARHM-GG-C-PG 64-16,1/2") -216 TON @ $98.28/TON
(W4700W
For (0" 188.M
Item #24 Asphalt Concrete Base Course (III -B2 -PG 64-10-110, 3/4") 286 TON @ $98.28/TON
Total of the Asphalt Paving items is $49,336.56 or 0.86% of USS Cal Builders total bid,
attached bid tabulations.
As such In accordance with Government Code Section 4104, USS Cal Builders should be
found non responsive by the City of Tustin and not awarded CIP NO 70224.
As the lowest responsive, responsible bidder SEIVIA Construction, Inc. stands ready
to perform the contract.
For any questions, please call (949) 470-0500 at your convenience.
Respectfully,
Joshua& Clyne
Senior Vice President
Heavy and Highway
General Contractors
320 Goddard Way
Suite 150
#A*
caftmle
92618
(949) 4740500
t�W(949)7$&9200
CITY OF TUSTIN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
BID OPENING SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: February 7, 2017"
TIME: 10 .M.
PROJECT:: Moffett Drive Extension Bridge and Roadway Construction Proiect (CIP NO. 702241
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $5,900,000.00
BIDDER
CITY
BID AMOUNT
BOND
1. USS Cal Builders
Stanton
$5,674,794.00
10%
2, SEMA Construction
Irvine
$6,309,434.11
10%
3, KEC Engineering, Inc,
Corona
$6,543,838.40
10%
4. Flatiron West, Inc.
San Marcos
$6,768,233.00
10
S. MCM Construction, Inc.
N. Highlands
$6,857,284.00
109E
6. Reyes Construction, Inc,
Pomona
$6,935,764,00
10%
7. Steve P. Rados, Inc,
Santa Ana
$7,270,860.00
10%
APPARENT LOW BIDDER: No. 1
USS Cal Builders
BID: SS,674,794 00
ITEM
LISTED 5U6 ONTRACTORS
CITY
Landscape & Irrigation
Marina Landscape, Inc,
Orange
Chainlink Fences & Gate
Herbert, Inc,
Oceanside
CIDH Piling
Zamborelli Enterprises
Laguna Beach
Electrical
Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc.
Chino
Prestressing CIP Concrete
Schwager & Davis, Inc.
San lose
Rebar
Integrity Rebar Placers
Perris
Bridge Fabricator & Installer
Stinger Bridge & Iron
Coolidge, AZ
010 PROPOSALS RECEIVED FROM CLERK BY: City Clerk's Office
0
LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS
By submission of this proposal, the Bidder certifies:
1. That helshe is able=to and will perform the balance of all work which is not covered in
the above subcontractors listing.'
2. That the AGENCY will be furnished copies of all subcontracts entered into and bonds
furnished by subcontractor for this project.
C-11
&a
g
8 8 8 Ei
E� a 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8.8 8$ 8
8 8 a 8 s s pn
8 8 8 8$
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a a 8 8 8 8 a
N Vi
8 4S $ E! 8 a a 8 8 8 8 8 8 Ei- 8 Ei $i
8$89
da I
§ § § §
E� 8 19 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
1,5 M 9 A P,
z
A A 11 � k
N �l
a 8 8 a. iR 8 8
; F.
x
t
..
08858¢8
88888ss so's Is s s a
? & s s s s
A *
tq
it
35 LS 35
T
t; 16 PK
9
5i
o yj
��'.igg8g88qK
$8 $
8 9 8 a 88gE$g855� 258
it 13 8 8 8 Zt8 8
RvMd
8 8
g-. 4 Vi
$9888.1
$!a
,�igoffl
VA
!3 !s !3 !3
A th 4 �s 6 it 6ul6 a66 t 6 5
vs a !3 !S
wf
jr
s
u i
F F
91 412
... . ..... ......
16
tg
Ht
M4
§gg
9999
1
M.1
14 w
of
A iv sf
of
16
El 8
Ap
I
T
'
zs
01
Ji
\ � � �\ � � � .
� . \�� � / . . .
� . \ � - .
s� � � �f / � . �
/���� �\%\» < � � �
. ~�° $\$/\ .�.
\ � \� > . � . �
�` . .
� . . ^�� , . . . � � .
ATTACHMENT 2
City Response to Bid Protest
Department of Public Works
Douglas S. Stack, P.E.
Director
February 16, 2017
FIRST CLASS MAIL AND E-MAIL
Joshua P. Clyne
SEMA Construction, Inc.
320 Goddard Way, Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92618
Re: Construction Protest Re Bid of USS Cal Builders
Tustin, Moffett Drive Extension Bridge and Roadway Project, CIP No. 70224
Dear Mr. Clyne:
The City is in receipt of the bid protest filed by SEMA Construction, Inc. ("SEMA")
concerning the above -referenced project. The City has contacted USS Cal Builders, Inc.
("USS") and asked USS to respond, which it has done. USS's response is attached.
This letter provides the City's response to SEMA's bid protest.
Summary
SEMA filed a timely bid protest claiming that the apparent low bidder on the
Moffett Drive Extension Bridge and Roadway Project, USS, submitted a bid that was
nonresponsive, and specifically that the bid failed to list subcontractors for items of work
valued in excess or one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the total bid. For the reasons
explained below, and based on the evidence submitted, there is no competent evidence
showing that USS has violated provisions of Public Contract Code section 4104 in
connection with their bid, and for that reason SEMA's bid protest is without merit and is
denied.
Analysis
On February 7, 2017, bids were received and opened on the Moffett Drive
Extension Bridge and Roadway Construction Project, CIP No. 70224 ("Project"). The
apparent low bidder was USS. On February 10, 2017, the City received a bid protest
("Bid Protest") from SEMA.
The Bid Protest asserts that USS failed to list a subcontractor or subcontractors
for items of work that are valued at more than one half of one percent of their total bid
price. SEMA alleges that USS should have listed a subcontractor or subcontractors to
perform the work needed for bid items nos. 23 and 24 as they are not capable of self -
performing the work and the total value of the work for the two bid items is more than
0.5% of the total bid price.
300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 • P: (714) 573-3150 9 F: (714) 734-8991 0 www.tustinca.org
Joshua P. Clyne
SEMA Construction, Inc.
February 16, 2017
Page 2
Public Contract Code section 4104 provides that a general contractor must list a
subcontractor who will perform work on a public works project the value of which
exceeds one-half of 1 percent of the prime contractor's bid. If no such subcontractor is
listed, the prime contractor must self -perform the work in question. In addition, if the
value of the work in question does not exceed one-half of one percent (0.5%), the prime
contractor is not obligated to list a subcontractor for the scope of work.
In response to the contention in the Bid Protest, USS submitted the attached
response dated February 13, 2017. USS's response adequately addresses the issues
raised by SEMA. USS explains that they will self -perform the work in connection with
bid item no. 24. On the face of the bid documents, there is nothing legally preventing
USS from self -performing this work and the City therefore has no basis to reject the bid
on this ground. As to bid item no. 23, USS explains that they will purchase the materials
directly and subcontract the labor, and they state that the value of the labor portion of
the bid item will not exceed one-half of one percent (0.5%). In addition, the City
observed that the total value of bid item no. 23 does not exceed one-half of one percent
(0.5%) of the total bid, so there was no requirement to list a subcontractor for the work
contained therein.
Accordingly, there is no competent evidence demonstrating that USS Cal
Builders, Inc. has violated provisions of Public Contract Code section 4104 in
connection with their bid. SEMA's bid protest is therefore without merit and is denied.
Sincerely,
CITY OF TUSTIN
DoVas.Stack, P.E.
Di Public Works/City Engineer
Attachment
C., Rabih EI -Zein, Sr. Vice -President, USS Cal Builders, Inc.
David Kendig, City Attorney
Joe Forbath, Deputy City Attorney
Ken Nishikawa, City of Tustin
Benny Tenkean, City of Tustin
.50
Z-VUSS CAL BUILDERS
February 13, 2017
VIA EMAIL & FAX
Douglas S. Stack, P.E.,
Director Department of Public Works
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
714-573-3150
Re: Response to Bid Protest by SEMA Construction
Moffet Drive Extension Bridge and Roadway
Bid Date- February 7th, 2107.
Construction Project CIP NO. 70224
Dear Mr. Stack,
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2017
TUSTIN PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
We received the above mentioned letter from your office today February 13th, 2017 (below) and our
response is as follows:
• In regards to item 23 (Asphalt Rubberized Hot Mix), please note that USS Cal Builders will be
purchasing the materials from the supplier directly and the labor portion of this work shall not
exceed one half of one percent of the contract sum.
• In regards to item 24 (Asphalt Concrete Base Course), please note that we are intending on
performing this work in house and with our own forces, both the purchase of the materials and
the associated labor work.
A determination of responsiveness boils down to a simple binary analysis: whether or not the bidder
complied with the bidding instructions and in this case it is clear that USS Cal Builders, Inc has done exactly
that, there are no regulations against listing a supplier.
Here USS Cal Builders bid must be found responsive due to our conformance to the above mentioned
requirements. USS Cal Builders did not deviate from the requirements of the contract documents.
Sincerely,
Rabih EI -Zein
Sr. Vice President
USS Cal Builders, Inc.
T 714 828 4882 . F 714 828 9498 LIC 654454
8051 Main Street, Stanton, Cts 90680 www.usscalhuilders.com
ATTACHMENT 3
Location Map
LOCATION MAP
Moffett Drive Bridge and
Roadway Construction Pr*
TUSTIN LEWCT
PROJECT LOCATION
Moffett Drive Bridge and
Roadway Construction Project
(CIP No. 70224)
FILE: CIP 70224 Moffett Bridge & Roodwoy.dwg
TUSTIN
RANCH
PROJECT
LOCATION
:I.
���� ♦ .
R ♦ �� ♦ ,�
ATTACHMENT 4
Bridge Design Perspectives
o a"x z 5/8" box
D 8"x 4" box 6"x 1-9" I -Beam I --I
in
2 5/8" Dia
171
�' i
� I� - II- -� - i IIII �I �I
ENMMM—�ral.-—
\I