HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1995 01 16MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 16, 1995
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:05 p.m. at the
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The Pledge of
Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Potts. The Invocation was given by
Mayor Saltarelli.
ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Thomas R. Saltarelli, Mayor
Jim Potts, Mayor Pro Tem
Mike Doyle
2.
Jeffery M. Thomas (arrived at 9:40 p.m.)
Tracy A. Worley
Council Absent:
None
City Clerk Wynn:
Absent
Others Present:
William A. Huston, City Manager
Lois Jeffrey, Interim City Attorney
i
W. Douglas Franks, Chief of Police
5.
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Tim Serlet, Director of Public Works
Robert Ruhl, Field Services Manager
Valerie Crabill, Chief Deputy City Clerk
6.
Dana Kasdan, Engineering Services Manager
Rita Westfield, Asst. Dir./Com. Development
Rick Brown, Building Official
Gary Veeh, Water Service Manager
Bettie Correa, Senior Personnel Analyst
Doug Anderson, Transportation Engineer
7.
Melissa O'Neal, Recreation Supervisor
Randy Westrick, Recreation Supervisor
Katie Pitcher, Administrative Assistant
Approximately 60 in the audience
PUBLIC INPUT - None
PUBLIC HEARING - None
CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEMS 1 THROUGH 14)
Items No. 3 and 9 were removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor
Saltarelli. It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Worley, to approve the
remainder of the Consent Calendar as recommended by staff. Motion carried
4-0, Thomas absent.
1.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 3, 1995 REGULAR MEETING
Recommendation: Approve the City Council Minutes of January 3,
1995.
2.
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL
Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of $2,327,539.41
and ratify Payroll in the amount of $311,330.75. 380-10
4.
360-82
REJECTION OF CLAIM N0. 94-51 - CLAIMANT, JOSEPHINE SIMON; DATE OF
LOSS, 11/23/94; DATE FILED WITH CITY, 11/28/94
Recommendation: Reject subject claim for property damages in the
i
amount of $50.00 as recommended by the City Attorney. 180-10
5.
REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 94-49 - CLAIMANT, DEAN WRIGHT; DATE OF
LOSS, 8/9/94; DATE FILED WITH CITY, 11/10/94
Recommendation: Reject subject claim for property damages in the
amount of $351.33 as recommended by the City Attorney. 180-10
6.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-7 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 93-176
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 95-7 approving Final Parcel
Map No. 93-176 (Bart Duesler) as recommended by the Community
Development Department.
600--
7.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-8 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECTS (CITY PROJECT NO. 600117) AND
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 1-16-95
AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 95-8 approving plans and
specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for subject
project as recommended. by the Public Works Department/Water
Division. 400-45
8. JAMBOREE ISLAND WATERING
Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended by
the Public Works Department/Field Services. 730-50
10. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - DESIGN OF WATER MAIN
REPLACEMENTS AT THE 17TH STREET, SANTA CLARA AVENUE, AND FAIRHAVEN
AVENUE INTERSECTIONS OF STATE ROUTE 55 (CITY PROJECT 600127)
Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a
Professional Services Agreement with IWA Engineers for design of
water main replacements at 17th Street, Santa Clara Avenue, and
Fairhaven Avenue necessitated by the widening of SR -55 Freeway as
recommended by the Public Works Department/Water Division. 400-10
11. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - JANUARY 91 1995
All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless
appealed by the City Council or member of the public.
Recommendation: Ratify the Planning Commission Action Agenda of
January 9, 1995. 120-50
12. PARTICIPATION IN AN EXPERIMENTAL -SPEED REDUCTION PROGRAM ON
JAMBOREE ROAD BETWEEN IRVINE BOULEVARD AND THE NORTH CITY LIMITS
Recommendation Direct staff to prepare and forward a letter to
the California Traffic Control Devices Committee requesting
authorization to participate in an experimentalspeedreduction
program on Jamboree Road between Irvine Boulevard and the north
City limits as recommended by the Public Works Department/
Engineering Division. 760-40
13. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE POLICE DEPARTMENT COMPUTERIZED RECORDS
AND DISPATCH SYSTEMS
Recommendation: (1) Authorize expenditure of $323,476.00 to OCS
Technologies, Pleasanton, California, for computer software
necessary to implement Police Department Records Management System
and Computer -Aided Dispatch System; (2) Authorize the Police
Department to execute a five-year lease with Hewlett Packard
Corporation for host computer hardware necessary for software
implementation in the amount of $103,338.00; and (3) Authorize the
expenditure of $37,738.00 to Cedar Computer, Torrance, California,
for the purchase of personal computer hardware and networking
software for implementation ofthePolice Department's computer
system as recommended by the Police Department. 380-40
LWD 1 D
14. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALAND SAFETY
LIGHTING AT TUSTIN RANCH ROAD/PIONEER WAY
Recommendation: Award contract for subject project to Signal
Maintenance, Inc. in the amount of $84,105.00 as recommended by
the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 400-45
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 - REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 94-52 - CLAIMANT,
RAYMOND BROOKS; DATE OF LOSS, 6/6/94; DATE FILED WITH CITY, 12/5/94
Mayor Pro Tem Potts stated that this incident had occurred in
Santa Ana and he was amazed the claimant's attorney had filed the
claim against the cities of Santa Ana, Tustin, and Irvine.
Mayor Saltarelli said that it was basic practice for a lawyer to
ascertain the correct parties involved in a case to prevent
malicious prosecution suits; and he suggested the City Attorney
forward a letter to the claimant's attorney regarding filing a
claim against the wrong entity.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding staff time involved in
responding to the claim; recouping costs from the attorney; a
lawsuit had not been filed; and consequences to the attorney for
filing a wrongful suit in court.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 1-16-95
Lois Jeffrey, Interim City Attorney, stated she would meet with
the Claims Administrator to draft a letter warning attorneys of
the consequences for filing wrongful claims against the City.
Council discussion followed regarding necessary action to prevent
frivolous lawsuits filed against the City.
It was moved by Potts seconded by Worley,
amount. , to reject subject claim
for personal injury and property damages of an undetermined
Motion carried 4-0, Thomas absent. 180-10
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9 - STATUS REPORT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
AT BRYAN AVENUE/PARRCENTER LANE
Councilmember Worley requested an update from staff of developers'
responses regarding retention of bonds/deposits and delaying
construction of the traffic signal. She stated that under normal
traffic conditions, one traffic signal per thousand residents was
recommended; however, Tustin had approximately two traffic signals
per thousand residents. She said that she did not want another
signal installed unless it was absolutely necessary.
It was moved by Potts, seconded by Worley, to receive and file
subject report.
Motion carried 4-0, Thomas absent. 760-65
REGULAR BUSINESS (ITEMS 15 THROUGH 25)
15. PRESENTATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REFUNDING
�... Ronald Nault, Finance Director, reported that Council had directed
staff to proceed with Assessment District Nos. 85-1 and 86-2
refunding. He stated the City's consultants, Bartle Wells
Associates and Paine Webber Inc., would present an outline of the
financing approach utilizing a Joint Powers Authority for the
assessment district refunding.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding forwarding the
financing information for Audit Committee review.
Lora Stovall, Bartle Wells Associates, summarized the financing
concept including the number and amount of City -issued fixed and
variable-rate bonds; the financing team composition; the refunding
approach; and Joint Powers Authority.
Council/speaker discussion followed regarding reasons for using
the Joint Powers Authority structure.
Dan Gangwish, Paine Webber Inc., stated that the intention of the
financing concept was to pool the fixed-rate properties into one
bond issue to create better credit; establish AAA bond insurance;
and reduce borrowing cost and residents' annual payments.
Council/speakers/staff discussion followed regarding the process
of residents' assessment district payments to the City and bond
r^�+ holders; evaluation of the City's credit standing by rating
agencies and bond insurers; construction funds; County of Orange
bankruptcy's impact on assessment district refunding; educating
the market that the refunding was an assessment -based financing
concept; and the importance of immediate action due to a potential
interest rate increase.
Lora Stovall, Bartle Wells Associates, summarized the bond
issuance process and refunding schedule.
William Huston, City Manager, noted that formal agreements for the
assessment district refunding would be presented to Council at
future meetings.
340-50
340-40
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 1-16-95
16. EAST TUSTIN DEVELOPERS REQUEST FOR SATURDAY WORK APPROVAL
Rick Brown, Building Official, reported that The Irvine Company
had requested Council consideration of Saturday construction
during the hours of 9:OO a.m. to dusk. A number of complaints by
area residents had been received regarding equipment deliveries
and early morning, late evening, and weekend construction noise.
He noted that the Planning Commission had imposed.conditions on
Tustin Ranch subdivision construction and the Municipal Code
contained noise restrictions. He said that inconsistencies were
discovered in the Municipal Code regarding Saturday construction
and enforcement." He 'summarized the ordinance including measuring
decibel levels; inconsistency of permitting Saturday construction;
and the East Tustin Specific Plan penalty provisions. He stated
staff had met with the developers and residents to resolve the
issue without success Orange County cities survey revealed
Saturday construction was permitted by all cities; and area
homeowner associations and developers had been notified of the
issue's review by Council.
Mayor Saltarelli stated his concern regarding the noise ordinance
ambiguity and allowing Saturday construction; and suggested
setting specific hours for Saturday construction.
The following members of the audience spoke in opposition to East
Tustin Saturday construction:
Elain Nermon, 2460 Kiser, Tustin (submitted petitions)
Nick Speliopoulos, 2435 Kiser, Tustin
Katharina Martinka, 13437 N. Mackay Court, Tustin
Jerry Kress, 10921 Gray Place, Tustin
Charley Stoll, 2170 Lindsey, Tustin
Jane Anderson, Sevilla Homeowners Association President
Michael Nermon, 2460 Kiser, Tustin
The following member of the audience spoke regarding allowing
Saturday construction with enforcement of subcontractor
violations:
Debra Curry, 2560 Alister Avenue, Tustin
Council/speakers discussion followed regarding the developer
monitoring subcontractors; advantages to area residents and
developers to allow Saturday construction; after second or third
noise violation the developer would lose Saturday work privileges;
setting specific construction hours; utilizing the code
enforcement officer; inconsistency of the noise ordinance; and
lack of permission to developers for Saturday construction in
Tustin Ranch.
The following member of the audience spoke in favor of East Tustin
Saturday construction:
Mike LeBlanc, The Irvine Company
Council/speakers discussion followed regarding improving developer
control over subcontractors and supply deliveries; clarifying the
noise ordinance; residents working with the developers to resolve
the noise problem; and submittal of a report indicating future
construction in the Tustin Ranch area.
Rick Brown, Building Official, clarified that the existing noise
ordinance contained a penalty provision to issue citations;
suggested elimination of decibel levels in the ordinance; stated
Orange County cities' survey revealed the code enforcement
department supervised noise regulations; and he noted past
approval of limited Saturday construction where public health and
safety were not impacted and construction was separated from
occupied residential areas.
Council/staff/speakers discussion followed regarding public health
and safety; the difficulty of measuring noise levels; eliminating
decibel noise levels in the ordinance; continuing Building
Official discretion of Saturday construction; reviewing Orange
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 1-16-95
County cities' ordinances that allow Saturday construction; The
Irvine Company meeting with area residents to discuss the issues;
residents calling the police department if noise violations
occurred; Saturday construction accelerating completion of
projects; and developers policing their subcontractors.
The following member of the audience requested The Irvine Company
provide their construction noise policy prior to meeting with area
residents:
Al Hinsling, Tustin,
Council/speakers discussion followed regarding The Irvine Company
and residents meeting to discuss developer construction
guidelines.
It was moved by Potts seconded by Saltarelli,
item. to continue this
Motion carried 4-0, Thomas absent. 230-65
Recessed the meeting at 9:12 p.m.; Reconvened at 9:25 p.m.
17. ORANGE COUNTY BANKRUPTCY STATUS
Mayor Saltarelli noted his attendance at a meeting with the
Creditor's Committee regarding the Orange County Bankruptcy. He
summarized that other city officials were displeased with the
County's lack of communication regarding County activities;
commended the Creditor's Committee in ascertaining the release of
property tax monies; public officials' request that the Board of
Supervisors present a plan for 100 percent reimbursement to
creditors; school districts should be a priority for fund
repayment; agencies should be protected against bond issue
defaults; the affect of the bankruptcy on Tustin Ranch residents'
assessment and Mello Roos district bonds; affect on the school
district's general fund; formation of the Orange County Pools;
public contacting the Board of Supervisors urging the County to
return 100 percent of funds to agencies; and he requested a City
resolution asking that the Board of Supervisors present a plan for
100 percent reimbursement to all creditors.
William Huston, City Manager, reported that a hearing was set for
January 26, 1995 to discuss the County's release of property tax
money; the County had withheld $1.2 million of City property tax
money; the expectation that the County would release the property
tax money to the City within a couple of weeks; $636,000.00
deposited with the County for the 800 megahertz communication
system was still in question; the County notified the City that
rent for Fire Station 37 would be delayed; County's request and
City denial of forgiving the rent payment; the Fire Joint Powers
Authority was at risk; the $1.9 million in Proposition 116 funds
for the rail station were held by the State; trading Proposition
116 monies for Measure M money; potential impact on Measure M
funds; $150,000.00 held by the County that had been allocated for
the Jamboree Road widening; and the impact on the Jamboree
Road/Edinger Avenue overpass project.
Councilmember Worley stated that the Creditor's Committee
attorney at the League of Cities meeting indicated it was unlikely
100 percent return to creditors would occur; however, the
Committee was attempting to make an equitable pay back to
creditors.
Mayor Saltarelli responded that County assets and 18,000 employees
provided an opportunity for larger reductions than what was
currently underway. He stated the County would probably increase
sales taxes to recover the money; the County's current plan to
recover the money would affect the City; residents must contact
the Board of Supervisors demanding 100 percent reimbursement; and
the potential impact on County libraries.
Councilmember Doyle stated his concern regarding the County
spending $600,000.00 to hire a public relations firm from Los
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 1-16-95
Angeles; urged citizens to contact the Board of Supervisors
voicing disagreement in hiring a public relations firm; and
requested a City resolution opposing the County hiring a public
relations firm.
Mayor Pro Tem Pottsstatedhe would support the resolution;
questioned the County's action in hiring over 190 new employees
after laying off approximately 150 employees; believed that the
County's government was antiquated and opposed the County —
Treasurer as an elected position.
Councilmember Thomas stated his displeasure with the County's lack
of communication; the County's projection of a 30 percent loss was
a conditioning process; opposed the Solomon Brothers contract with
the County; noted several firms had offered free advice to the
County and Request for Proposals were not issued; South Orange
County's discussion to secede and form their own County; the
importance of Orange County cities working together in solving the
problem; noted John Moorlach's qualifications; and Orange County
firms should be hired to manage Orange County's investment
portfolio.
Mayor Saltarelli reiterated his request that a resolution be
drafted calling for a plan from the Board of Supervisors for 100
percent reimbursement to all creditors.
Council discussion followed regarding the City's willingness to
work with the County; prioritizing repayment of funds; Board of
Supervisors taking responsibility for the bankruptcy and pledging
to resolve the matter; and public officials involvement in the
restitution plan. 150-20
18. MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Thomas, to receive and file
subject report.
Motion carried 5-0.
355-50
Council/staff discussion followed regarding review of the
Investment Policy at the joint Audit Committee and Council
meeting; 5 -year bond duration; and computer software.
19. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DELINQUENCIES
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Worley, to receive and file
subject report.
Motion carried 5-0. 340-40
340-50
20. SET MEETING DATE FOR JOINT MEETING WITH AUDIT COMMITTEE
Council concurred to meet with the Audit Committee on February 6,
1995, at 5:30 p.m. 120-10
21. AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS FOR ADVERTISING BUS
SHELTERS PROGRAM
It was moved by Potts seconded by Thomas, to authorize staff to
enter into negotiations with Patrick -Target Media for an exclusive
advertising bus shelter franchise agreement.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding negotiation
guidelines; performance standards; and the number of firms
contacting staff during the 2 -week extension.
Motion carried 5-0. 690-35
22. CHANGES TO THE TUSTIN AREA YOUTH ISSUES COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING
It was moved by Potts seconded by Doyle, to reduce Council
membership to one and appoint Al Murray as member -at -large.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 1-16-95
23.
24.
Motion carried 5-0.
125-85
ANALYSIS OF RED LEFT -TURN ARROWS AT SIGNALIZED LOCATIONS
Tim Serlet, Director of Public Works, reported staff investigated
the possible removal and replacement of red left -turn arrows with
protected/permissive signals. He noted the number of protected
left -turn arrows in the City; the recent replacement of
protected/permissive signals with protected left -turn signals
based upon accident history; City policy to install protected
left -turn arrows when traffic met the State minimum criteria;
protected/permissive signals created delay, fuel consumption,
Pollution, and increased accidents; coordination of traffic
signals; 25 percent of City traffic accidents in the past 3 years
were caused by right-of-way violations; and staff recommended
maintaining the current policy regarding installation of protected
left -turn phasing at signalized locations on arterial highways.
Mayor Pro Tem Potts remarked on the lack of traffic signal
coordination in the City; one vehicle turning left triggered the
intersection; traffic congestion in Tustin; City of Irvine's
reduction of 38 signals to protected/permissive; requested traffic
accident history at those Irvine intersections; major
intersections should have red left -turn arrows during peak hours;
and reduction of traffic and improved traffic flow in the City.
Councilmember Worley clarified that she did not want to remove
every red left -turn arrow in the City as misquoted in an Orange
County Register newspaper article. She stated unnecessary traffic
delays were a growing frustration to drivers and requested staff
investigate the accident history in Irvine where
protected/permissive signals were utilized.
Tim
Tim Serlet, Director of Public Works, stated that the 38 Irvine
intersections did not meet minimum State traffic warrant criteria
when the protected red left -turn arrows were installed; the Orange
County Traffic Engineering Council did not recommend installation
of protected/permissive signals if a system was coordinated,
contained a certain number of approach lanes, and contained site
problems; and the Engineering Council was hesitant to quantify
accide t d 4 --
n a a and recommended each agency set their own accident
statistics.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding the City's protected
left -turn arrows met minimum traffic warrant criteria; the
Engineering Council cautioned cities from installing
protected/permissive signals because traffic signals vary in each
jurisdiction; obtaining accident history at City intersections;
and assessment district signals.
It was moved by Thomas seconded by Worley, to receive and file
subject report.
Motion carried 5-0.
COUNTY AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE
760-62
It was moved by Potts seconded by Doyle, to continue this item to
the February 6, 1995 Council meeting.
Motion carried 5-0. 150-20
25. APPROVE TUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION
NO. 95-1 TO AMEND BYLAWS CONCERNING NUMBER OF MEMBERS AND
COMPOSITION OF MEMBERS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Melissa O'Neal, Recreation Supervisor, reported that the Tustin
Community Foundation Board of Directors had discussed the need to
expand the Board not to exceed fifteen members to include
additional people with business contacts in the community.
It was moved by Worley seconded by Thomas, to approve Tustin
Community Foundation Board of Directors Resolution No. 95-1 to
amend the Bylaws of the Tustin Community Foundation as follows:
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 1-16-95
(1) Change the number of City Councilmembers from two (2) members
to one (1) member on the Board of Directors, and (2) Increase the
number of Boardmembers to not to exceed fifteen (15) members.
These Boardmembers would serve three year terms and be elected by
a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the city Council.
Motion carried 5-0. 125-45
PUBLIC INPUT -'None
OTHER BUSINESS
CLOSED SESSION
William Huston, City Manager, requested the Closed Session be
continued.
CASE SWAYNE PROPERTY ACQUISITION
Lois Jeffrey, Interim City Attorney, reported on the completion of
the Case Swayne property acquisition.
UTT PROPERTY
Lois Jeffrey, Interim City Attorney, reported on the near
completion of code enforcement action on the Utt property.
FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY
Mayor Pro Tem Potts reported on Foothill/Eastern Transportation
Corridor Agency meeting activities.
SOUTHWEST AREA
Mayor Pro Tem Potts reported on his involvement in the recent
arrest of shoplifters in the Southwest area and the need for
strict enforcement and aggressive redevelopment of the Southwest
area.
LEAGUE OF CITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE
Councilmember Worley reported on League of Cities Community
Services Committee meeting activities, and reported that she had
joined the Library Task Force Sub -committee.
LETTER REGARDING ORANGE COUNTY REGISTERARTICLE
Councilmember Worley noted that she would not respond to an
anonymous letter sent to her regarding a misquote in the Orange
County Register.
TUSTIN PRIDE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
Councilmember Thomas requested staff assist the Tustin Pride
Committee in recruiting new membership.
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
Councilmember Thomas noted the Tustin Boys and Girls Club
$25,000.00 funding for a portable facility at Heideman School had
been withdrawn by the County of Orange and he requested staff
explore alternative funding and submit recommendations at the
February 6, 1995 Council meeting.
COUNCILMEMBER THOMAS 1994 LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL
Mayor Saltarelli reported that Councilmember Thomas had been
chosen by the Orange County Republican Party as the Local Elected
Official of 1994.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 9, 1-16-95
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE
Mayor Saltarelli reported on Orange County Sanitation District
Committee activities and noted the recent flood and sewage
problems caused by releasing flood waters into the sewer system.
TRANSFER OF PARR DEVELOPMENT LAND
Mayor Saltarelli requested agendizing at the next Marine Corps Air
Station Tustin Base Closure meeting the transfer of 80 acres for
park development to another agency other than the County of
Orange.
CLOSED SESSION
It was moved by Doyle seconded by Potts, to continue closed session: (1)
to confer with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation entitled In
Re: County of Orange, U.S.B.C. Case No. SA 94-22272 JR, and In Re: Orange
County Investment Pools, U.S.B.C. Case No. SA 94-22273 JR; and (2) to
confer with Nick Nichols, the City's labor negotiator. The employee
organizations involved in potential negotiations are Tustin Municipal
Employees Association and Tustin Police Officers Association.
Unrepresented employees are management and confidential units.
Motion carried 5-0.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Saltarelli adjourned the meeting at 10:55 p.m. The City Council had
scheduled a joint meeting with the Tustin Unified School District Board of
Education on Wednesday, February 1, 1995, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council
Chambers; scheduled a joint meeting with the Audit Committee on February
6, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers; and the next regular
,,..meeting of the City Council was scheduled for Monday, February 6, 1995, at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 300 Centennial Way.
16117 J V
THOMAS R. SAPARELLI, MAYOR
RY E. WYNN, CITY,CLERR