The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07 TLLD LEVY FOR FY 07-08 05-01-07~~:~ ~,, a: ~x_i AGENDA REPORT Agenda Item 7 Reviewed: City Manager Finance Directo MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2007 TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM:. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 SUMMARY The City Council, at their meeting of February 5, 2007, adopted Resolution No. 07-17, which ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Levy of Annual Assessments for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. The Engineer's Report has now been completed and consideration of the following actions is now appropriate: • Adoption of Resolution No. 07-41 approves the Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2007- 2008. • Adoption of Resolution No. 07-42 declares the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and set a public hearing for June 5, 2007. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolutions: • Resolution No. 07-41 approving the Engineer's Report for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District Levy of Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-2008; and • Resolution No. 07-42 declares its intention to levy annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and setting a public hearing for June 5, 2007. FISCAL IMPACT The landscape maintenance and public street lighting expenses within the Tustin Ranch area will be recovered through the levy of the annual assessments for the District. The City's proposed assessment on parkland within the District is $8,349.41 and will be paid through the City's Fiscal Year 2007-2008 property tax expense fund. BACKGROUND The District was formed on July 15, 1985 to install and maintain certain street lighting and landscaping in the area generally bounded by Browning Avenue, Irvine Boulevard, Jamboree Road (formerly Myford Road) and the I-5 Freeway within the City of Tustin. Tustin Landscape and Lighting District Levy of Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 May 1, 2007 Page 2 Assessments for the benefiting property were confirmed for the first fiscal year, 1985-1986, and each fiscal year thereafter. As property developed in the Tustin Ranch area, such development was required to annex to the District. As a result of procedures required by the passage of Proposition 218 on the November 1996 Statewide ballot, which added Article XIID to the State Constitution, the City re-analyzed the District regarding the special benefits associated with the improvements for each property in the District, commencing with Fiscal Year 1997-1998. Notices and ballots to approve the assessment including future adjustments based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) were mailed in the spring of 1997 to all property owners in the District. Subsequently, at the conclusion of a public hearing on July 7, 1997, the majority of returned ballots, weighted by assessed amount, approved the annual assessments. Based on the results of the ballot proceedings, the base assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1997- 1998 may be increased in subsequent years by no more than the increase in the CPI for all urban consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, and Riverside area. The percentage increase in the CPI for calendar year 2006 is 3.3%. The District's budget for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 has been increased per the maximum allowed by Proposition 218 to offset anticipated increases in operating expenses. Each year the City estimates the cost to provide the street lighting and landscape maintenance services in the Tustin Ranch area. This total cost is divided among the parcels on a proportionate share, based on a report prepared by consultant engineers. The precise method used to establish each parcel's special benefit may vary according to land usage and benefit area, but similar parcels with equal benefit from the District pay equal assessments. There are 5,681 parcels within the District for Fiscal Year 2007-2008, which is equal to the number of parcels for Fiscal Year 2006-2007. The District includes three separate benefit areas based upon the special benefits received. • Benefit Area "A" - Properties located in Benefit Area "A" pay only for Arterial and Collector Street Lighting (ACCT). • Benefit Area "B" - Properties located in Benefit Area "B" pay for Arterial and Collector Street Lighting, plus Parkway, Slope, and Trail Landscaping (ACCT + PSTL). • Benefit Area "C" - Properties located in Benefit Area "C" pay for Arterial and Collector Street Lighting, plus Parkway, Slope, Trail Landscaping, plus Local Residential Street Lighting (ACCT + PSTL + LRLT). Those parcels that pay for local residential street lighting are located within the residential tracts that have public streets. Tustin Landscape and Lighting District Levy of Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 May 1, 2007 Page 3 Typically, owners of single-family residential parcels in each area pay an equal share. The proposed assessments to be paid by single family residential parcels in each of the following benefit areas are: • Benefit Area „A„ (ACLT) ...................................................................... $9.79 per year • Benefit Area."B" (ACCT +PSTL) ........................................................ $67.47 per year • Benefit Area "C" (ACCT +PSTL +LRLT) ........................................... $93.70 per year The total costs to be assessed for lighting and landscape maintenance for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 are $93,814.00 and $443,660.00, respectively, for a total operating and maintenance assessment of $537,474.00. The Engineer's Report prepared by Harris & Associates has been filed with the City Clerk and contains the following proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 along with a comparable listing to last year's assessment. ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY BY LAND USE FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 BENEFIT AREA: A B C A B C ACCT + ACCT +PSTL ACCT + ACCT +PSTL LAND USE ACCT PSTL +LRLT ACCT PSTL +LRLT Single Family Res. ($/Dwelling Unit) $65.31 / DU $90.71 / DU $67.47 / DU $93.70 / DU Multi-family Res. ($/Dwelling Unit) $48.98 / DU $50.60 / DU Non-Residential ($/ac) $391.86 / ac $404.82 / ac Non-Res -Tustin Market Place ($/ac) $61.50 / ac $58.74 / ac Golf Course ($/ac) $261.24 / ac $269.88 / ac Vacant and Parks $/ac) $130.62 / ac $134.94 / ac Tustin Landscape and Lighting District Levy of Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 May 1, 2007 Page 4 CONCLUSION The two attached resolutions require adoption by the City Council. These resolutions provide for the following: • Resolution No. 07-41 approves the Engineer's Report for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District Levy of Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-2008. • Resolution No. 07-42 declares the City Council's intention to provide for an annual levy of assessment for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Resolution No. 07-42 also sets the date, time, and place for a public hearing concerning the annual levy of assessment for the District. The hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, June 5, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. ~~- .r/~~ Tim D. Serlet Dana R. Kasdan Director of Public Works/City Engineer Engineering Services Manager S:\City Council Items\2007 Council Items\Public Hearing for TL&LD 07-41 & Reso 07-42.doc Attachments: Resolution No. 07-41 and No. 07-42 Engineer's Report for Tustin Landscape and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2007-2008 RESOLUTION NO. 07-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 07-17, the City Council initiated proceedings for the 2007-2008 Fiscal Year for the levy of annual assessments and ordered the Engineer to prepare a report in accordance with Section 22565 of the State of California Streets and Highways Code and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Engineer has filed the report with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has submitted the report to the City Council and the City Council now has reviewed and examined the report as so submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tustin that it determines and orders as follows: Section 1: That the report entitled "Engineer's Report for Tustin Landscape and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2007-08" prepared by the Engineer, Harris & Associates, dated April 23, 2007, including description of improvement, estimated costs and diagram, as filed with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. Section 2: A copy of this report shall remain on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 1St day of May 2007. Lou Bone, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk RESOLUTION 07-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING FACILITIES IN THE TUSTIN RANCH AREA WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND PROPOSITION 218 AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. 07-17 initiated proceedings for the annual levy of assessments for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code) as amended and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, by said Resolution No. 07-17, the City Council ordered the City Engineer to prepare a report pursuant to Section 22565 of said Code and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer did prepare and file such a report and it was approved by the City Council on the 1St day of May 2007, with the passage and adoption of Resolution No. 07-41. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tustin that it determines and orders as follows: Section 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Tustin to order the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and to levy and collect said assessments pursuant to the provision of said Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of said Streets and Highways Code) as amended and Proposition 218. Section 2: That the improvements to be undertaken consist of the installation, maintenance, servicing and operations of those certain public landscaping and lighting facilities located within the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. The Assessment District designated as Tustin Landscape and Lighting District generally encompasses the portion of the City known as East Tustin, being north of the I-5 Freeway and east of Browning Avenue except the areas of all public streets, avenues, lanes, alleys, and rights-of-way provided, however, notwithstanding property owned by the railroad and public utility companies not used for public purposes shall be included in the district and not be excluded pursuant to the aforesaid exceptions. Resolution 07-42 May 1, 2007 Page 2 Section 3: That reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection for a fully detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any areas therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. Section 4: That said proposed maintenance, servicing and operation of landscaping and lighting, in the opinion of the City Council of the City of Tustin will be to the benefit of the property lying within the described boundaries of the Assessment District as said Assessment District is described and defined in said Engineer's Report. Section 5: Notice is hereby given that Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Tustin City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California 92780 is hereby fixed as the time and place where all interested persons may appear before the City Council and be heard concerning the annual levy of assessments of the District, and extent of the District, the services to be performed, and the proposed assessment and all other matters relating thereto. Protests must be in writing and must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. Any such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and, if filed by the property owner, shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. Section 6: The City Clerk shall cause notice of the hearing to be given by causing the Resolution of Intention to be posted and published in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 1St day of May 2007. Lou Bone, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ENGINEER'S REPORT FO R TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2007 - 08 CITY OF TUSTIN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Harris & Associates... April 23, 2007 City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 Engineer's Report April 23, 2007 Page 1 ENGINEER'S REPORT TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT The under-signed respectfully submit the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. "1'he undersigned certifies that he or she is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California. DATED: April 23, 2007 Q~OF E S 5/p~ ~~~~~,pp,N E CO~t ~2G~ Harris & Associates m # EXP. 3/31/08 qtr ~- i STq~ clvt~. ~~~P Joan E. Cox, P.E. F °F cnvF~ RC.E. No. 41965 I I-HREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed in the office of the City Clerk on the day of 2007 City ofTustin Orange County, California By City Clerk, I REREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, on the day of , 2007 City of "Tustin Orange County, California By ,City Clerk, 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Roll was tiled with the County Auditor of the County of Orange, on the day of , 2007 City of Tustin Orange County, California 13y ,City Clerk, rUustintty07-08\reporlsUlmd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Submittal and Acknowledgments ..................................................................................1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................3 Report ............................................................................................................................4 Part A -Plans and Specifications ............................................................................6 Part B -Estimate of Cost .........................................................................................9 Part C -Assessment Roll .......................................................................................10 Part D -Method of Apportionment of Assessment ...............................................1 l Part E -Property Owner List .................................................................................19 Part F -Assessment Diagram ................................................................................19 Appendix Budget Detail /Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations Budget & Assessment Comparison Government Parcels Landscape Maintenance Facilities Map Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map Land Use Map Preliminary Assessment Roll (under separate cover) r:\tustin\fy07-08\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 Aprit 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 3 INTRODUCTION H iSTO RY The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the engineering analysis to levy the assessments in the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District for the 2007-08 fiscal year. The District was formed on July 15, 1985 to install and maintain certain street lighting and landscaping in the area bounded by Browning Avenue, Irvine Boulevard, Jamboree Road (formerly Myford Road) and the I-5 Freeway within the City of Tustin. Assessments for the benefiting property were confirmed for the first fiscal year, 1985-86, and each fiscal year thereafter. As property developed in the Tustin Ranch area, such development was required to annex to the District. The current boundary is shown on the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, which is included in the Appendix. As a result of the new procedures required by Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), which was approved on the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the State Constitution, the City re-analyzed the .District regarding the special benefits associated with the improvements for each property in the District, for the 1997-98 fiscal year. Notices and ballots to approve the Assessment, including a Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment, were mailed to all property owners in the District, and a majority of the returned Assessment ballots approved the Assessment, including potential adjustments for increases in the CPI in future years. IMPROVEMENTS The District improvements consist solely of parkway landscaping, trail landscaping, slope landscaping, arterial and collector street lighting, and local residential street lighting in public rights- of-way and dedicated easements. The District does not install or maintain parks or median islands in roadways. SCOPE OF REPORT This report covers the levy of annual assessments for the 2007-08 fiscal year. The base assessment rate which may be levied for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) may be increased by the CP[ for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Area in any calendar year. The intent of applying the annual CPI adjustment to the base assessment rate is to maintain the value of the maintenance work, in relation to the increased cost of the maintenance. Therefore, the rates applied in FY 1997-98 are equal to the maximum rates today, when you consider the increased cost of living. In 1997, property owners within the District were noticed for and they approved, by assessment ballot proceeding, potential adjustments in the rates based on the annual CPI. The CPI for Calendar Year 2006 (December 2005 to December 2006) is 3.3%. Since the notice to property owners in 1997 included a potential CPI adjustment each subsequent year, and the property owners approved the potential range of rates, it is not necessary to hold an assessment ballot proceeding any year in which such an adjustment is made. For the calculation of the maximum assessment for each Fiscal Year, please refer to the Appendix. r:\tustin\fy07-OS\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 4 CITY OF TUSTIN FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XIIID OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the 197? Act), Article XIIID of the California Constitution and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for: TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District" or "District", I, Joan E. Cox, P.E., the authorized representative of Harris & Associates, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows: PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and are incorporated herein by reference. PART B ESTIMATE OF COST An estimate of the costs of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is on file in the Oftce of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. r:ltustin\fy07-081reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 5 PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The method of apportionment of assessments indicates the proposed assessment of the net amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. PART E PROPERTY OWNER LIST A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Orange, is keyed to the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange which are incorporated herein by reference. PART F ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any benefit areas within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is on file in the Office of the City Engineer and is incorporated herein by reference. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange for the fiscal year to which this Report applies. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. r:\tustin\fy07-08\reports111md0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 Engineer's Report April 23, 2007 Page 6 PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Tustin, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be serviced and maintained as generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITY OF TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 The existing facilities to be maintained and serviced include street lighting and arterial landscaping as described herein. • LIGHTING The street lighting system in the District consists of 760 lights. A summary by type and size follows: No. Size of Lumens 375 16,000 11 9, 500 374 5,800 TY,pe of Light High Pressure Sodium Vapor High Pressure Sodium Vapor High Pressure Sodium Vapor The area is built-out; therefore no additional street lights are anticipated. • LANDSCAPING The arterial landscaping includes parkway, slope and trail landscaping in the Tustin Ranch area, specifically: • the southerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road • the northerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Jamboree Road, excepting that portion adjacent to the SCE substation • the easterly side of Browning Avenue between the northerly corner of Tract No. 13094 (southerly of Bent Twig Lane) and El Camino Real, including area from APN 500-201-02 for a future overcrossing, but excepting that portion adjacent to the SCE substation • the westerly side of Tustin Ranch Road between the Santa Ana I-5 Freeway and Jamboree Road • the easterly side of Tustin Ranch Road between Bryan Avenue and Jamboree Road, excepting that portion adjacent to Heritage Park between Heritage Way and Kinsman Circle, that portion adjacent to the Golf Course northerly and southerly of the main entrance, and that portion adjacent to the park site at Tustin Ranch Road and Portola Parkway r:ltustin1fy07-08\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, Flf 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 7 • the southerly side of Irvine Boulevard between the westerly boundary of Tract No. 13053 and the easterly boundary of Tract No. 13038 (±630 feet easterly of Myford Road) • the northerly side of Irvine Boulevard between the westerly City limits and Jamboree Road • the westerly side of Jamboree Road from Bryan Avenue northerly 1,100 feet to the northerly boundary of Tract No. 13030 • the westerly side of Jamboree Road between Irvine Boulevard and the northerly City limits, except that portion adjacent to the Tustin Sports Park • the slopes on the westerly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City limits and 600 feet southerly • the slopes and parkways on the easterly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City limits and Tustin Ranch Road, including the slopes granted to the City by the Transportation Corridor Agency per Instrument No. 1999048101 recorded January 22, 1999 (net acreage increase of 4.11 acres) • La Colina Drive, northerly and southerly sides, between Tustin Ranch Road and the westerly City limits • Portola Parkway, both northerly and southerly sides, between Jamboree Road and Tustin Ranch Road • Equestrian/Hiking Trail between Tustin Ranch Road/Portola Parkway and Peters Canyon Regional Park • Paseo for public access between Jamboree Road and Pioneer Road adjacent to Tract Numbers 14366 and 14576 The total landscaped area is approximately 51 acres. These areas are shown on the Landscape Maintenance Facilities Map, in the Appendix. The District will fund costs in connection with the District maintenance and servicing including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory operation of these facilities. Reference is made to Part "D" of this report for a discussion of the Benefit Areas and the facilities associated with them which are serviced and maintained. The facilities are described as follows: Landscapingand Appurtenant Facilities Facilities include but are not limited to: Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, sidewalk maintenance resulting from landscape growth and appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of--way, parkways, and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. r:\tustin\fy07-OS\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 8 Lightin ag_nd Appurtenant Facilities Facilities include but are not limited to: Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, conductors, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as required to provide lighting in public rights-of--way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. The public lighting system shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination. Electricity for street lights shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company, and it shall be adequate for the intended purpose. Rates for power shall be those authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of any of the public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric energy for the public lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing the general nature, location and the extent of the improvements to be serviced and maintained, are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are by reference herein made a part of this report. r:\tustin\fy07-08\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 9 PART B ESTIMATE OF COST The City's budget for the maintenance and service costs, shown below, details the estimated costs and fund balances for Fiscal Year 2007-08 as available at the time of preparation of this report. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost can be recovered in the assessment spread including incidental expenses. This was not changed by Article XIIID of the California Constitution. The costs can include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with the district proceedings. The Reserves, District Administration and Projected Fund Balance items have been prorated based on the budget amounts. FY 2007-08 BUDGET & ASS ESSMENT District Less Projected Reserve Admin. Fund Balance Total to Service Cate o Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2007 Asmt Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $86,112 $18,774 $1,724 (22,474) $84,137 *Object No. 6220 Local Residential Lighting $9,188 $2,703 $184 (2,398) $9,677 *Object No. 6220 Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $584,500 $0 $11,704 (152,543) $443,660 *Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350 Totals $679,800 $21,477 $13,612 ($177,415) $537,474 Total to Assessment: $537,474 * For descriptions of the object numbers, refer to the 'Budget Detail' table in the Appendix. Note: District Administration Costs are prorated based on the Budget Amounts and include Orange County's charge of 0.3% of the assessment for placement and collection on the property tax roll. The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City will make funds available to the District to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed upon receipt of assessments. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The 1972 Act allows a reserve for cash flow not to exceed 50% of the budget. For a breakdown of the costs by Service Category and Benefit Area, please see "Benefit Areas" on page 17 of this report. rltustin\fy07-08\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 10 PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL The Assessment Roll is a listing of the proposed assessment and the amount of assessment for Fiscal Year 2007-08 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor's Office, and contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Tustin, which is incorporated herein by reference. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report. r:\tustin\fy07-08\reports111md0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 11 PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT GENERAL The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and landscaping facilities. Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The 1972 Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." In addition, Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which was approved on the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XllID to the California Constitution, requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Prop. 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. Prop. 218 also requires that publicly owned property which benefit from the improvements be assessed. REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services. EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Since the assessment will be levied against parcels of property as shown on the tax roll, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be spread just by parcel, not considering land use or parcel size, a single family parcel would be paying the same as a 50 unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment in a similar zone and this would not be equitable. The single family residential lot has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments and is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to calculate the EDU's for other residential land uses and for non-residential parcels. Every land-use is converted to EDU's: parcels containing apartments are converted to EDU's based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel of land; commercial parcels are converted based on the lot size of each parcel of land. r:ltustin\fy07-08\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 12 The EDU method is seen as the most appropriate and equitable method of spread for landscape and lighting districts, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type and size. Single Family Residential (SFR). Parcels zoned for single family residential uses are assessed t EDU per dwelling unit. Parcels designated as SFR land-use will be assessed 1 EDU per dwelling unit, including vacant subdivided residential lots and vacant land zoned for single family residential uses with a tentative or final tract map. Multiple Family Residential. Multiple-residential (including condominiums) land use equivalencies are determined based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel. Due to population density and size of structure relative to the typical single family residence, each dwelling unit defined asmulti-family residential, including condominiums, would be 0.75 EDU. The EDU's assigned to amultiple-residential parcel are calculated by multiplying the number of dwelling units by the EDU factor of 0.75. This includes vacant multi-family residential parcels zoned for multiple-residential uses with a tentative or final tract map. Non-Residential. In converting non-residential properties to EDU's, the factor used is the City of Tustin's typical standard single family residential lot area and the number of lots that could be subdivided into an acre of land. All properties that are developed for non-residential uses are therefore assigned 6 EDU's per acre. These include commercial, industrial, church, school and other non-residential uses. Vacant Parcels with No Development Designation. Vacant parcels with no development designation or without a tentative or final map are assigned a reduced equivalency due to their current lack of immediate development potential. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the total value of the property. In Tustin Ranch, the land value portion of a single family detached residence appears to be typically one-third or higher of the total value based on the County Assessor's tax rolls. Therefore, vacant parcels are assigned equivalency units at the rate of one-third of improved property which is 6 EDU/acre xone-third = 2 EDU/acre. Park parcels are also considered as vacant with no development potential, and are assessed at that rate. Peters Canyon Regional Park is a large, natural, open space park with very few facilities, which straddles the cities of Orange and Tustin and a portion of unincorporated county area. The park has many access points around its perimeter and one is within the Tustin Ranch area. This park receives a very small amount of benefit relative to its size, and it seems reasonable to compare it to other existing parks within Tustin Ranch. At the time the district was foc-med, there were seven developed parks, five public parks (Camino Real, Cedar Grove, Heritage, Laurel Glen, and the Tustin Sports Park) and two private parks, with an average park size of 6.26 acresl. Therefore, 6.26 acres have been used to estimate the relative benefit Peters Canyon Regional Park receives. Golf Course Property. Golf Course parcels are developed commercial property, but the development is at a very low level. Therefore, golf course parcels are assessed at a rate between I As of FY 1997-98, when the District was approved by public owner ballot. r:\tustin\fy07-08\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and lighting District, FY 2007-08 Engineer's Report April 23, 2007 Page 13 developed and vacant land, at twice the rate of vacant parcels with no development designation, which is 2.0 EDU/acre x 2 = 4.0 EDU/acre. Public Property. Article XIIID of the California Constitution requires that all benefiting public properties be assessed for their fair share of the special benefit. Public property which is designated for residential or non-residential purposes (such as schools and fire stations) will be assessed the same as private property with the same designation. Public parks will be assessed the same as vacant parcels with no development designation. Exempt Property. Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public drainage, public easements and rights-ol=ways, public greenbelts and parkways. Also excepted from assessment would be utility rights-of--way, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), landlocked parcels, unbuildable parcels vacated by the City, and parcels designated on Tract or Parcel Maps for landscaping. EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT (EDU) FORMULA Land Use Basic Unit x EDU Factor = EDU Rates Sin le Famil Res. SFR) 1 D.U. x 1.00 = 1 EDU/DU Multi-famil Res. (includin Condos) 1 D.U. s 0.75 = 0.75 EDU/DU Commercial/Industrial and other Non-Residential (includin Schools) 1 Acre x 6.00 = 6.0 EDU/ac Vacant (includin Parks) 1 Acre x 2.00 = 2.0 EDU/ac Golf Courses 1 Acre x 4.00 = 4.0 EDU/ac SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS STREET LIGHTING BENEFIT Proper maintenance and servicing of the street lighting system benefits all properties within the District by providing security, safety and community character and vitality as outlined below. Street lights provide only incidental benefits to motorists traveling to, from or through the area. BENEFITS OF STREET LIGHTING Security and Safety Community Character and Vitality • Mitigates crime • Promotes social interaction • Alleviates the fear of crime Promotes business and industry • Enhances pedestrian safety Contributes to a positive nighttime visual image A large portion of the City of Tustin is within an Ad Valorem Lighting Maintenance District and is paying for the operation and maintenance of street lights in a similar manner. The area of the District, being a recent annexation to the City, was not a part of this Ad Valorem Maintenance District. Therefore, to fund the public street lights in the developing area, in 1985 the City established the 1972 Landscape and Lighting District. Those properties that are adjacent to private streets pay for their local private street lights through their Home Owners Association fees. ~ As of FY 1997-98, when the District was approved by public owner ballot. r:\tustin\fy07-08\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 14 Arterial and Collector Lighting. Street lighting on the arterial and collector streets provides special and direct benefits to all properties within the District, as these lighting benefits are directly related to the positive enhancement of the Community and therefore increase property desirability and quality of life. All properties within the District receive a special benefit from lighting on the arterials and collectors. Lighting at intersections, which is defined as safety lighting, is considered to be the minimum lighting requirement for vehicular safety; therefore, safety lighting represents the general benefit portion of street lighting and is not assessed. Traffic Signals are also considered to provide a general benefit and are not assessed. Street lights which are not adjacent to the development in the District are deemed not to benefit the area. Street lights on the east side of Jamboree Road, north of the I-5 Freeway, which provide benefit to the property on the east side of Jamboree, are not included in this District and the costs will not be assessed. The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings, acres and EDUs for each land use type that receive this benefit. Arterial & Collector Lighti ng Benefit FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 B Land Use Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's Single Family Res. 2,603 2,627 2,627.000 2,603 2,627 (1 ) 2.627.000 Multi-famil Res. 2,974 5,100 3,825.000 2,974 5,100 3.825.000 Non-Residential 60 183.454 1,100.724 60 183.454 _1_,100.724 Schools 10 48.573 291.438 10 48.573 291.438 Vacant 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 Parks 22 72.135 144.270 22 72.135 144.270 Golf Course 12 151.991 607.964 12 151.991 607.964 Total 5,681 7,727 456.153 8,596.396 5,681 7,727 456.153 8,596.396 NOTE ON DIFFERENCES IN THE ABOVE TABLE: (1 ~ Some "SFR" parcels are developing tracts with multiple SFR dwelling units. As maps are recorded and parcels assigned new APNs, the parcels will increase to match the dwellings. Local Residential Lighting. Many of the residential units in the District have private street lighting systems directly adjacent to their homes. This lighting is usually provided by a Home Owners Association, and payment for the lights are usually made through association dues or assessments. Parcels that have local residential street lighting provided by the City receive special and direct local lighting benefit and are assessed for those local lights. There are eighty- seven local residential 5,800 lumen lights and four 9,500 lumen lights. The cost for these lights is assessed only to these benefiting parcels. r:ltustin\fy07-08\reports111md0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 15 The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings and EDUs that receive this benefit. There were no changes from the previous fiscal year. Local Residential Lighting Benefit B Land Use Parcels Dwellin s EDU's Sin le Famil Residential 369 369 369.000 369 369 369.000 LANDSCAPING BENEFIT Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value. In Parkways and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated: ...there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common sense, that parkways do in fact add value to properly, even though the amount cannot be determined exactly.... Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts of the City,... It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as the landscaping along side the roadway. Landscaping along recreational trails and greenbelts, if well maintained, provide beautification and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value. In Greenways for America by Charles E. Little, it is stated: ... [real estate] agents routinely advertise properties as being on or near the trail....property near but not immediately adjacent to the Burke-Gilman Trail is significantly easier to sell and, according to real estate agents, sells for an average of 6 percent more as a result of its prpximity to the trail. Property immediately adjacent to the trail, however, is only slightly easier to sell....trails are an amenity that helps sell homes, increase property values and improve the quality of life. Additionally, the National Recreation and Park Association, in June 1985, stated: The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in or near the recreation area, and is of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a stake in a maximum of total assessed values. The District enjoys a higher level of landscaping and streetscaping in their parkways and slopes than the rest of the City of Tustin. The City provides funding for the landscaped medians in the area, so these costs are not assessed. Additionally, a pedestrian and equestrian trail, linked with the regional trail system, is landscaped and beautified by the District. The landscape improvements along the r:\tustin\fy07-OS\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 16 arterial and collector streets, in the parkways and slopes, and the regional trail enhance the beauty of the area and benefit all parcels in the community. Excepted from this landscaping benefit are the Tustin Marketplace, Tustin Annex, and the Tustin Auto Center, which provide their own landscaping adjacent to their properties at an even higher level than the rest of the District. Landscaping along roadways provides only incidental benefits to motorists traveling to, from or through the area. The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings, acres and EDUs for each land use type that receive this benefit. Landscaped Parkway, Slope & Trail Benefit FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 B Land Use Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's Single Family Res. Multi-family Res. Non-Residential 2,603 2,974 19 2,627 5,100 32.624 2,627.000 3,825.000 195.744 2,603 2,974 19 _2,627 (1 5_,100 ) 32.624 2,627.000 3.825.000 195.744 Schools 10 48.573 291.438 l0 48.573 291.-138 Vacant 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 Parks 22 72.135 144.270 22 72.135 144?70 Golf Course l2 151.991 607.964 l2 151.991 607.964 Total 5.640 7.727 305.323 7,691.416 5 640 7,727 305.323 7.69 L416 NOTE ON DIFFERENCES 1N 'iHE ABOVE TABLE: (1) Some "SFR" parcels are developing tracts with multiple SFR dwelling units. As maps are recorded and parcels assigned new APNs, the parcels will increase to match the dwellings. r:\tustin\fy07-OS\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 17 BENEFIT AREAS There are three benefit areas within the District: Benefit Area A -parcels that receive only Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit. Benefit Area B - parcels that receive Arterial and Collector Street Light benetlt and Parkway, Slope, and Trail Landscaping benetit. Benefit Area C - parcels that receive Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit, Parkway, Slope, and Trail Landscaping benefit, and Local Residential Lighting benefit. The following tables provide a summary of parcels, dwellings, acres, EDU's and Costs by Benett Area for the District. The Service Category Costs are based on the EDU's and rates for each benefit area. FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 B Benefit Area Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's A 41 -- 150.830 904.980 41 -- 150.830 904.980 B 5.271 7,358 305.323 7,322.416 5,271 7,358 305.323 7,322.x16 C 369 369 -- 369.000 369 369 -- 369.000 Total: 5,681 7,727 456:153 8.596.396 5.681 7.727 456.153 8,596.396 Service Category Costs by Benefit Area F'1' 2006-07 Fl' 2007-08 Benefit Area Arterial & Collector Street Lights Local Residential Lightin Parkway, Slope & 'T'rail Landsca ing Total to Assessment Arterial & Collector Street Lights Local Residential Lightin Parkway, Slope & Trail Landsca in Total to Assessment A $9,277 $9,277 $8,857 $8,857 B $75,061 $403,186 $478,247 $71,668 $422,375 $494,043 C $3,782 $9,373 $20,318 $33,473 $3,612 $9,677 $21,285 $3-I,S7.4 Totals $88 120 $9 373 $423 504 $520 997 $84 137 $9 677 $443 660 $537 474 r:\tustin\fy07-081reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, fY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 18 ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY __ The tables below summarize the assessment amounts per EDU for each Bcnetit Area. Service Category and Benefit Area FY 2007-08 ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY ACt,T -Arterial & Collector Lighting $9.79 / EDIJ FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 LRLT - Loeal Residential Lighting $26.23 ;EDU Actual Max. Asmt Rates Actual Total PSTL -Pkwy, Slope & Trail Landscape $57.63 /EDU Asmt Rates (incl. CPI)* Asmt Rates Asmt Benefit Area A (ACI;1') $10.25 ,' F,DU $10.59 / EDLJ $9.79 /EDU $8,857 Benefit Area B (ACL1' + PS"IL) $65.31 1 EDU $67.47 i F:DI! $67.47 /EDU $494,043 Benefit Area C (ACCT' +- PS"TL +- LRLT') $90.71 / L:DU $93.70 /EDU $93.70 / F.DU $34,574 $537,474 "See "Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations" in the Appendix for details on the calculation of the Max. Assessment Rates The base assessment rate which may be levied for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) may be increased by the CPI for all [Jrban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Area in any calendar year by City Council approval each year. The CPI for Calendar Year 2006 (December 2005 to December 2006) is 3.3%~. The proposed assessment rates by land use category for each Benett Area are shown below. ASSF,SSMF,NT RATE SUMMARY BY LAND IiSE FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 BENEFIT AREA: A B C A B C ACL"I' + ACCT +PSTL ACCT + ACL'I' r PS'['L, LAND USE AC[:I' PSTL +LRLT ACCT' PSTL + l.Rl.'1' Single Family Res. ($/Dwelling Unit) $65.3 ] i DU $90.71 I DU $67.47 / DU $93.70 / DU Multi-family Res. ($/Dwelling unit) $43.94 / DU $50.60 / DU Non-Residential ($lac) $391.46 ! ac $404.42 / ac Non-Res -Tustin Ntarket Place ($/ac) $61.50 / ac $58.74 ! ac Golf Course ($/ac) $261.24 I ac $269.88 ! ac Vacant and Parks ($%ac) $ 130.62 l ae $134.94 / ac I, Joan E. Cox, P.E. the authorized representative of Harris & Associates, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer, am of the opinion that the assessments have been apportioned in accordance with the estimated special benefit derived by each parceLand that the assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit. DATED: April 23, 2007 //~¢OF E S S~O~ ////~/~O ,~OPN E Cpl ~ t~Z ~~ x ~~ ~ N0. 41965 ttr\EXP. 3/31/08 /ir ~'qT~ C I V l~ ~ ~~~\P OF C A~~ ~ Harris & Associates I3y: - AN I:. CO , P.E. ASSESSMENT' ENGINEER K.C.E. No. 41965 r~tustin\fy07-08\repbrts\IImd0708 rpbfinal doe City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Page 19 PART E PROPERTY OWNERS LIST The property owner list with the names and addresses of each property owner of each lot or parcel, as shown on the Assessment Diagram referenced in Part F herein, is the list of property owners within the District boundaries as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Orange and is, by reference, made part of this report. PART F ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. r:\tustin\fy07-081reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Appendix Appendix r:\tustin\fy07-OS\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report appendix BUDGET DETAIL FY 2007-08 DISTRICT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Ob"ect No. Descri tion City's Budget ($) District Estimate of Costs ($) Comments 6018 Architect/En Services 13,612 13,612 Annual Engineer's Report -Dist. Admin.; County charge of 0.3% for placement on property tax bills 6028 Landsca a Maintenance 360,000 360,000 Contract -Turf& groundcover maint. 6132 Tree Trimming Contract 110,000 110,000 Contract -approx. LSoo trees/yr 6220 Street Light Energy 95,300 86,112 9,188 Street lights -Arterial & Collector Street lights -Local 6335 Electric 9.500 9.500 For irrigation equipment 6350 Water 105,000 105,000 1RWD service areas DISTRICT TOTAL 693,412 693,412 Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations by Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases FY 2007-08 CPI WORKSHEET Benetit Area A Max Actual Base Year CPI Rate ($) Rate ($) FY 1997-1998 7.91 7.91 FY 1998-1999 L2% 8.00 7.87 FY 1999-2000 2.2% 8.18 8.04 FY 2000-2001 2.8% 8.41 8.04 FY 2001-2002 3.7% 8.72 8.40 FY 2002-2003 2.1 % 8.90 8.90 FY 2003-2004 3.7% 9.23 9.23 FY 2004-2005 1.8% 9.40 9.40 FY 2005-2006 4.4% 9.81 9.81 FY 2006-2007 4.5% 10.25 10.25 FY 2007-2008 3.3% 10.59 9.79 Benetit Area B CPI Max Rate ($) Actual Rate ($) 50.38 50.38 1.2% 50.98 50.98 2.2% 52.10 52.10 2.8% 53.56 52.10 3.7% 55.54 55.54 2.1% 56.71 56.71 3.7% 58.81 58.81 1.8% 59.87 59.87 4.4% 62.50 62.50 4.5% 65.31 65.31 3.3% 67.47 67.47 Benefit Area C CP[ Max Rate ($) Actual Rate ($) 69.96 69.96 1.2% 70.80 70.27 2.2% 72.36 71.82 2.8% 74.39 71.82 3.7% 77.14 76.38 2. l % 78.76 78.76 3.7% 81.67 81.67 1.8% 83.14 83.14 4.4% 86.80 86.80 4.5% 90.71 90.71 3.3% 93.70 93.70 r:\tustin\fy07-OS\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2007-08 April 23, 2007 Engineer's Report Appendix Budget & Assessment Comparison FY 2007-08 Budget & Assessment District Less Projected Reserve Admin. Fund Balance Total to Service Category Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2007 Asmt Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $86,112 $18,774 $1,724 (22,474) $84,137 *Object No. 6220 Local Residential Lighting $9,188 $2,703 $184 (2,398) $9,677 *Object No. 6220 Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $584,500 $0 $11,704 (152.543) $443,660 *Object Nos. 6028, 6132. 6335, 6350 Totals $679,800 $21,477 $13,612 ($177,415) $537,474 Total to Assessment: $537,474 FY 2006-07 Budget & Assessment District Less Projected Reserve Admin. Fund Balance Total to Service Category Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2006 Asmt Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $94,696 $29,665 $2,042 (38,283) $88,120 *Object No. 6220 Local Residential Lighting $10,104 $3,135 $218 ($4,085) $9,373 *Object No. 6220 Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $524,100 $99.978 $1 L303 ($211,877) $423,504 *Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350 Totals $628,900 $132,778 $13,563 ($254,244) $520,997 Total to Assessment: $520,997 Litahtinq and Landscape District Fund Balance Proiection Beginning Fund Balance $304,415.00 Per Mid-Year Budget 07/01 /06 Projected Revenues Full Collection per Engineer's FY 06-07 $515,000.00 Report Projected Expenditures FY 06-07 $642,000.00 per Mid Year budget Projections Projected Ending Fund Balance FY 06-07 $177,415.00 r:\tustin\fy07-08\reports\IImd0708 rpt-final.doc 0 M ~ N O ~ ~ 0 4• ao 0 Z . ti ~ O N O N H ~ LL ~ 0 } F- J U J Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y L N ~ tQ (6 (6 (6 f6 f6 (6 t4 f6 f0 f6 ~ a ~ a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ L Y a ti u, ~ v, ~ u, ~ ~ m a~ a~ ~ C ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ n a n a n n n o 0 0 0 0 ~ i o m m ~ :.. +~ +. u~ cn cn ca u~ u~ v~ C~ C~ C~ U' ~ L C ~ ~ ~ cn cn cA C c ~ c c C ~ c`4 `m N m cn a~i .` .` j Y Y Y m N iA in w t~A N -6 "O "O a N C ~ (Q N N 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 N N N N L O 1 U 2 = J d ~ d •- f- H f- F- F- H U U U U IL tZ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C V1 !~/1 ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (n N 7 7 7 7 3 7 7 7 7 7 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 ' H H H •- H H H H H H F-- F- H H F- H H H F- H ~ w w w w ~ w ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ w w w w w w ~ w ' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O ' T T T T T T T >+ T >+ >+ >. T T >+ >+ T >+ >. >+ IIv v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v J w U Q a z w Z w 0 ti f O ~ tD L O ~ o~ N 6 } LL i 00 h O ~ n ~ O ~ O ~ N LL~ • f~ M 00 O N c0 sr N M O M OD (O 00 O O ~ ~ M ~ ' N N M O) N ~ t0 00 M f~ d' O 1~ M N O O O N ~ O f~ N ~ ~ O) ~ t0 ~ O O M M O O CO O O ~ I` ti O O O ~ M M ~ (D t[') ~ I~ O O O M M t.f) cj .- M O EA N N EA DO EA b4 N N ~ ~ M EA fA • M O ~ O O N M O O O O M O N M (.4 I~ M N ' CO f~ N O) N O N o0 O M ~ N f~ M O) ~ ~ O I M to M ~ O ~ N ~t N O N M O O O CO M (D N ; f~ Op OO O (fl f~ ~ ~ N M N CD CO CD I~ O O N O O ~ ~ ~ O b4 N N ER O EA r- EA N M N ~ ~ d' EH EA 69 ER N ~ ER EA fA Efl 64 d4 b4 EA E+9 bR fPr J ~ O o0 oO to O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O J~ O U1 O N CO o0 O CO ~ M CD ~ I~ M M M ~ O ~ N CD M O N N M o0 (O N N ~ N V O N Lf) O N O I~ M ~ M ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O N N ~ M ~ N r r• r F- u zo ~~ ~ ; ~. U H u. u W ~ Z W m ~ Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y _ Y . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lr !Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a. a. a a a a a a. a a a a a tZ a a a v a ~~ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m I~ O_ N M O O CO t~ DO N ~t CD ~ I~ O ~ M M O O O O O O O O O O ~ N N M M O M ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N e- ~-- ~ ~ M N O N N M O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lC') N N N N N O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O • O O O O ~ N N N N N ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N lty l1~ ~ In lA to Ln lf) lf') Ln t.f) In In In to Ln In Lf') In to I~ N O M N N m V N O ~ O Z ~ ~ O N O ~ N F.. } LL ~ OO } H U J O ` O ~ U ~ C N N O ~ -~ ~ ~ W U ~ ~ w in o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O N N U U U U U U U U ~ U ~ Z (n (n cA cn (n cn cn (n d ~ m a m a a~ ~ m ~ m 0 0 0 o ~ a~ :~ w ;._ ;~ ~ 0 0 0 o w p) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U ~ C (n (n (n (n ~ C C C C C -U -U -~ -~ C O ~ ~ ~ N N N " N "- N w N ~ ~ .~ Q 7 F- 7 H ~ H 7 F- 7 ~ ' 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O C O Z O O O O O :_~ O ~ L L L ~ L dl to U) d/ L O O U U cn U cn U cn U cn U cn 7 ~ 7 H- 7 F- 7 ~ U cn ~ ~ H o0 0 .- ~n ~ ~ a~ v ~n ~n J O Z CO O ~ N ~ O O h N O ~ W m W ~ rn o ao rn ~ ao m M ~ v U O ~ 00 ~ N t~ OM W N ~ ~ ~? ~ N N ~ ER M N EA fA EPr ~ _ K} b4 ~ a LLw EH 64 b4 fA EH N H N Z Q W Z OD F- N N O (O O M O ~ O O O Z n W f~ ~ a0 O N O ~ 00 O O N O O ~ N N ti M tt') M N W ~ ~ O ~ N ~ d' ~C1 to M sr N O~ OO O M ~ M OO N O ~ ~ ~ O N ~ b4 V, N K) ER ER N EA b4 ~ ~ ~ fA EA EA K} fA Q ~ O ~ O f~ O O O O O O ~ W (O O ~ O O OO ti O O M ~ N O QO N I~ O ~ O O M CJ co ai ui ~ o cv ri Sri ~ c- ao Q ~ W Z y ~ ~ Y 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ~ Z ~ U U U U U U U U U U ~ Q a (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U J H LL Q W~ m m m m m m m m m m m W Q m CO Cfl M In f~ ~ CO O) N I~ N O ~- N N N M O O M ~ ~ ~ N ." .- r r O O c- ~ ~ ~ ~ N Z N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N d Q o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ C~ ~ ~N LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FBI THE 2007-08 FISCAL YEAR f LANDSCAPE MAINT7=NANCE FACILITIES MAP LEGEND (ANOSCAPE YA/NILNANCE - SLOPE YA1N/ENANCC REDUCED SCALE :~ HARRIS ~ ASSOCIATES 3r Ew~udln Pao, SuM~ 150 MNM. CA 9191{ (919) 655-3900 ~ iAll (919) 655-3995 CITY OF Tl1~fNV LANDSCAPE AND LK3FfTING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR TF~ 2007-OS FISCAL YEAR ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/BOUNDARY MAP LEGEND BEAYFR AREA A BENfF1F ARU B 8E1![F1T ARFA C CRY BOUkCAYt ~: HARRIS do ASSOCIATES u ti«~. ewt, swl. Iso Ir~m, G1 9I61A (9A9) 655-1900 ~ FAX (919) 655-5995 y~~~y.-.~yMy~~ pp~~ n... ,~ o -YFWIy G/b Y Y IM~N Y m+nsi n~u u ~ . ,- .r-aitii iwu u e\.r~Y~+1~~~ava rrr,ti wwra r VII 1 ~ 1 Va7111\ LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR THE 2007-08 FISCAL YEAR LAND USE MAP LEGENO x.,IdMxa c«o,~sl «~~ vim. c.,.,~.~ con couro. t;"_ crry ew~awr -- _ - - ~r~~ w ne a .~ w ~~I~ ~;; •-°yn e~ m .P ~~ HARRIS ~ ASSOCIATES u t,.wn.. r.~, ax. Iso kvNu, G 92611 (919) 655-39~ ~ fAl( (949) 655-3993 REDUCED SC\ALE a~n=.r nr u . $1