Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
17 JWA NOISE ABATEMENT REPORT 06-05-07
Agenda Item ~_ Reviewed: ~,;_ ~ ~ ,~ City Manager N /!) i 4 ~J ~~.~:..~~ Finance Director ~_ MEETING DATE: JUNE 5, 2007 T0: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This report transmits two John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for the third and fourth quarters of 2006. The average noise level measured at monitoring station NMS 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, remained relatively the same during the third and fourth quarters. Average noise levels during both quarters remained below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT No Fiscal Impact DISCUSSION Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their webpage. Attachment 1 contains the quarterly reports for the third and fourth quarters of 2006. A brief overview of the information contained within the attachment is as follows: Measured Noise Levels • During the third quarter of 2006, the average CNEL at Remote Monitoring Station (NMS)10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, was 56.9 dB. This is 0.3 dB lower than the previous four quarters (Q-3 2005 through Q-2 2006). For comparison, the CNEL was the same (56.9 dB) during the third quarter of 2005. John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement June 5, 2007 Page 2 • During the fourth quarter of 2006, the average CNEL was 56.8 dB. This is 0.3 dB lower than the previous four quarters (Q-4 2005 through Q-3 2006}, For comparison, the CNEL was 0.2 dB higher (57.0) during the fourth quarter of 2005. • All measured noise levels are below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL for residential areas. Noise Complaints • Durin the third uarter of 2006, there were no Tustin area complaints compared g q with four (4) complaints for the same period during 2005. • During the fourth quarter of 2006, there were three (3) Tustin area complaints compared with no complaints for the same period during 2005. • The number of complaints decreased during the third quarter and increased during the fourth quarter compared to the same periods in 2005. Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. ~~C;e.l~~aRl Reina Kapadia Assistant Planner Attachments: . Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for July 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. S:1Cdd1CCREPORTIJWA report to council 6-05-07.doc ATTACHMENTS John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for July 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: July 1, 200b through September 30, 2006 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 135th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-SS: 324'/2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-8N:17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-lON:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1, 2005 - September 30, 2006). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area" -1- rigure ^ JOHN WAYNE NOISE MONITORING LOCATION 0 1 2 3 4 5 Scale In miles AIRPORT STATIONS MAP N JWAdivisionProjecti G~vt~~C~,iT~~inRel~itioni~~bn~;r~~~o~f.dgn (NMS) -2- Figure 2 A = a ~ f ~~ ~' ~ f a '. ~ ~~iw ~ ~ t a~ it G ~? ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~i .~ 1 •w ~ .. ~ fit , ` ~5 ~~ b v .~ <. ~ . ! ~ F ~~_' S .. .. > ~ .: 1 ~ ~ ~1 {y e '~ h ~ 1. ~ d'' `~ Y ~ {~' S A ` ° Y • ~' ~ r ad, ~^ eA g ~ a ~ A xyp ~M fG ~' ~ e . 4" ~ g y ' ~~f R~ s ~ • r ~ I ` v nt .~ n ~e :, ,. a ,, s.. ~ ' :t o ~, _. ,. 5 °; "'111 p ., .. ~. .~ y y ` 4 ei µ 4 ~~.t µ .' .. • a.. ' Y~' .~ . r ~ r. F iW ~ j v~ Y R y ~Bl 6' T fi. • .r T ,. .. _ r .t s . ;' ~ A . . ,- ~ y ,.. ~ ~ ° " 7 ~ ~ r~ s t .. r ~ :' .. 1 . Ak • ~ ~ ' ~ .~ ~ amp , ~' a . r rye + 6g7€ , ~ `4 aw • ~ ~. a / L~ ~~ a ~ .' 5 t ~ ~ ~ '"'fir ~ + j f ~ III •'~ e ` ^. 1 are ,~~ ~°'' ~ .r '1 i ~ 4 s 9 ~ ' ~ 4..~ ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ t ~'tc t ~~ t ~ J r ~ MJ..t. ~i °~:+~"i ' ~. ,,, .: a, ~l ,, t r~~~ ' ~ 6 0 r I ~ r:r .` 1 ~a a . ,~ ~ . ~u .~~ ~, ~ "~ ~, ~ ~ ,. ., ~ it. a .. i ,- ~W ~~+~ rM ... ` ' y' .y i ~ ~ f Y r ; ~ ~~, k ~r ~ f` ' ~ y-~y. b 1 ~ .~ ~.r a ~. ~ ~ ~~M~ lei ~ W ~e 1i ,yy ~ Y + _ ~ ~ Acv ~~'.. ~ ~ T 1 C E M .A ~.~ ~ r d 'w i' .. »i y t ` ..r ,. . ~ ~ ~ ,, r .. ' ~. ~,~ ~ ~' '~C ., .. ~, ,, ~ S .~ :., , .~ ^, . o- ,~ ~ ~ a ~. o a ~ .'~a a ~. ° ,jj ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ . ~. ~ Y. a ~. =~ ~ Vii' i~' ..hr - ., <..w, ~~ y~„ _~ ~.A 4 tt ~ `,~. ~, 1 ~ - - "tip ~ $ ,~: .! .~a M . ~. 3 ~. ~, a~ . ~. _. ,, ~ ~` ry . ~ . Ate' ~,,; ~ t ' ..~ H ,. ~ ~ ~l, ~ r ~ , ~. ~, n ~` ~ ~~ ,~ ~ a.. M ~ .. . r ~' ,. .- P ; ,y ., , tYd, ~,. .~ b~.r ,. .~ {, ., ~ 1F N ,,^'~ ~ ~ ~`. f q, 'ri',. ~ ., f ~. , , .~ ° a q ~ t~ y q~{, RI ,. ._ ~, ~ . "'hhh #' ,. ., ~ ~ ..~ 4 ~ .,~ °~:~ K ~.h `~ .*~., "fit ;~ i { ~ tsl~ __-- ~ Noise Monitors ----' Single Family Residential 65 dB CNEL Contour _____~ Multi-Family Residential STATISTICS: ~ ac ea Incompatible Land Use: 8.3 Acres or .013 square miles Number of Dwellings: 77 January 2005 -December 2005 Number of People: 192.5 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit) Mine creveAssociutes -3- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 1 1. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS .I~ ilv _ ~antamhar IMF Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Average Daily Jet Prop Operations (2 Jet Operations Jul 8,626 336 2,856 29,813 370 Au ust 8,863 348 3,543 32,695 400 September 8,230 337 2,942 27,203 372 Third Quarter 25,719 1,021 9,341 89,711 381 Twelve Months 10/01/05 - 09/30/06 99,681 4,117 36,136 347,076 372 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) July -September 2006 Jet Carrier Military Prop Carrier GA Jet GA Other 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 Number of Operations 50,000 60,000 NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#NlA" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending September 30, 2006, seventy-five dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the b5 dB CNEL contour); this is the same number -4- 11 I27IOb of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" as that for the previous twelve month period ending June 30, 2006. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the "Noise Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program, approximately 77 general agriculture (A-1) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October,19$6. Each property was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993,124 residences have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAIP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym "SAH AIP".)During the third quarter of 2006, no additional residences have been made compatible through the County's SAH AIP. A total of 486 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AIP. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (July 1, 2006 -September 30, 2006) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period July 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006, the Office received 536 complaints from citizens. This is a 49.7% increase from the 358 complaints received last quarter. It is a 103.0% increase from the 264 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 $' i 59 36 35 26 ~$ ~ 14 3 2 4 3 6 9 ~ ~~~a 5~~a fat °ya ~r~~ ~o`J~ °,° ar t°y~ ~~~ ~~~a ~~~`\~ eaGr ~~'o 'roc a ~ •~~ oo~ ~ ~ ~°~ ~~~. o~G ~~ ~o o~ ~5 ,~ ~ Ora 0 \~o Q°~~ ~~ Goys ~~ ~ ~,~ ~~a ago ~~~ ~\ao ~ Q°~ ~a o~ ono o~ ~ ~~ ~ o~ ~~~ G 0 ~' ~ Community Note: One caller is responsible for 84% of the complaints from Balboa Penninsula. -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 10105 through 9106 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Oct 2005 67.7 66.3 65.9 58.6 58.2 60.5 58.2 68.6 47.9 57.0 # Da s 30 31 31 28 29 22 17 27 18 28 Nov 2005 67.5 66.1 65.5 58.1 58.4 60.0 57.0 68.2 49.4 56.9 # Da s 30 30 30 28 28 29 23 30 30 30 Dec 2005 67.4 66.2 65.3 58.3 58.1 59.6 57.6 68.4 50.1 57.2 # Da s 31 31 30 31 31 31 17 31 28 28 Q-4 2005 67.5 66.2 65.6 58.3 58.2 60.0 57.6 68.4 49.4 57.0 # Days 91 92 91 87 88 82 57 88 76 86 Jan 2006 66.4 65.0 65.4 57.8 57.1 60.1 55.2 67.4 47.2 56.4 # Da s 31 31 31 29 31 31 31 31 31 29 Feb 2006 67.0 65.7 65.1 58.0 57.4 59.4 55.5 68.1 47.8 56.4 # Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 Mar 2006 67.7 66.3 65.6 59.1 58.0 59.9 56.7 68.9 45.0 58.0 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 26 31 31 31 Q-12006 67.1 65.7 65.4 58.4 57.5 59.8 55.8 68.2 46.7 57.0 # Days 90 90 90 88 90 90 85 90 90 88 Apr 2006 67.7 66.3 65.8 59.2 58.5 60.0 57.0 68.9 45.2 57.8 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 22 30 30 30 May 2006 67.5 66.1 65.4 58.7 58.0 59.6 55.9 68.9 45.1 57.8 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 29 31 Jun 2006 67.9 66.4 65.9 58.7 58.3 60.0 56.2 69.3 46.1 57.2 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Q-2 2006 67.7 66.3 65.7 58.9 58.3 59.9 56.4 69.0 45.5 57.6 # Days 91 91 91 91 91 91 82 91 89 91 Ju12006 67.9 66.1 65.7 58.2 57.6 59.4 56.3 68.9 43.1 56.6 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Aug 2006 68.2 66.5 66.1 58.7 58.0 59.9 55.8 69.3 44.1 57.3 # Da s 31 31 31 31 25 31 31 31 31 31 Sep 2006 67.8 66.0 65.4 58.1 57.2 59.1 55.1 68.7 45.0 56.7 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Q-3 2006 68.0 66.2 65.8 58.4 57.6 59.5 55.8 69.0 44.1 56.9 # Da s 92 92 92 92 86 92 92 92 91 92 Q-4 2005 t hru Q-3 2006 Total 67.6 66.1 65.6 58.5 57.9 59.8 56.3 68.7 46.7 57.1 # Days 364 365 364 358 355 355 316 361 346 357 Q-3 2005 thru Q-2 2006 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 67.6 66.2 65.7 58.6 58.1 60.0 56.8 68.6 47.7 57.2 # Days 354 361 359 351 356 343 263 358 288 350 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.5 0.0 -1.0 0.0 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION July 2006 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.2 65.5 65.0 57.2 56.8 58.2 55.2 68.4 45.7 55.1 2 66.9 65.1 64.8 57.7 56.6 58.4 56.2 68.2 42.2 54.7 3 66.2 64.3 63.6 57.2 55.7 57.2 60.2 68.2 36.5 55.7 4 66.3 64.7 63.8 58.0 57.0 58.2 57.3 68.6 47.0 55.7 5 68.2 66.6 65.8 58.8 58.3 59.9 56.1 69.3 40.8 57.1 6 67.7 65.8 65.5 58.6 57.8 58.8 55.2 69.2 27.4 56.5 7 68.1 66.2 65.9 58.6 58.5 59.6 56.1 69.2 37.9 56.3 8 66.4 64.8 63.8 56.5 56.2 57.5 53.8 67.1 32.5 53.6 9 67.5 65.9 65.5 57.6 57.4 58.7 54.5 69.8 47.9 56.9 10 67.8 66.2 65.7 58.7 57.8 59.3 55.8 69.5 41.9 56.9 11 67.5 66.0 65.4 57.9 56.9 59.2 54.9 68.7 45.9 58.9 12 68.2 66.6 66.2 58.0 57.5 59.3 56.0 68.2 45.6 55.3 13 68.4 66.2 65.9 58.2 57.6 59.3 55.7 69.4 #N/A 57.2 14 69.5 67.1 67.3 58.4 58.2 59.7 56.4 68.4 37.9 55.6 15 66.8 65.1 64.2 57.1 56.0 57.9 54.4 67.4 42.8 54.5 16 67.7 65.8 65.3 58.3 57.2 59.4 56.1 68.6 42.6 57.1 17 68.1 66.2 65.5 58.7 58.1 59.6 58.1 68.9 42.1 56.5 18 68.8 67.2 66.2 59.0 58.8 60.2 56.4 70.1 41.3 57.4 19 68.5 66.8 66.5 58.9 58.9 60.4 56.8 69.2 43.9 56.1 20 69.3 67.7 67.3 59.4 59.3 61.3 57.7 69.0 46.6 56.0 21 68.6 67.0 66.5 58.1 58.1 60.3 56.3 69.1 43.7 55.9 22 67.1 65.1 64.8 56.1 55.5 58.1 54.2 67.4 44.2 54.3 23 68.5 66.5 66.1 58.4 57.4 59.9 56.0 69.0 47.6 55.5 24 68.2 66.5 66.1 58.2 57.6 60.1 56.3 69.1 34.9 56.5 25 68.6 66.0 66.6 59.9 58.4 60.7 57.1 68.9 42.0 57.2 26 68.0 66.4 66.2 58.0 57.5 59.6 55.5 69.2 44.4 56.6 27 68.4 66.0 65.6 58.8 57.5 59.8 56.6 69.8 37.4 58.2 28 68.4 66.7 66.2 58.7 58.3 59.9 56.3 69.7 38.9 58.3 29 66.9 65.2 64.6 56.8 56.8 58.0 54.9 68.2 39.8 56.5 30 67.9 66.6 66.2 58.5 57.9 59.9 56.2 69.7 40.1 57.9 31 67.9 66.5 65.7 58.8 58.4 59.8 56.4 69.7 35.2 58.8 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 En.Av 67.9 66.1 65.7 58.2 57.6 59.4 56.3 68.9 43.1 56.6 #NlA indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION August 2006 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.8 66.1 65.7 59.1 58.3 59.9 56.3 69.1 37.8 58.1 2 67.9 66.7 66.3 59.2 58.6 60.2 56.9 69.2 43.3 57.6 3 68.7 66.7 66.7 59.6 58.8 60.7 56.9 70.0 33.3 59.5 4 68.3 66.4 66.0 59.6 58.5 60.5 57.3 69.4 46.7 57.8 5 67.1 65.6 65.1 58.0 57.3 58.9 55.9 67.5 29.0 55.5 6 68.0 66.8 66.3 58.7 58.6 60.1 57.3 69.7 42.4 58.4 7 68.5 67.0 66.4 59.2 58.8 60.8 56.9 69.8 42.3 58.3 8 69.3 66.7 68.0 59.9 59.0 61.4 56.3 68.9 45.7 56.5 9 68.5 66.8 66.2 58.5 57.6 59.2 54.1 69.0 47.1 56.1 10 68.7 66.6 66.1 58.6 58.1 59.5 54.7 70.2 38.7 57.2 11 68.6 67.4 66.3 58.8 58.1 59.8 54.7 69.7 45.1 57.9 12 67.3 65.3 64.9 58.0 57.1 59.0 55.1 67.5 42.6 54.6 13 68.2 66.7 66.4 59.0 58.8 61.0 56.7 69.3 42.0 57.1 14 68.7 67.2 66.6 59.8 59.5 61.0 56.6 69.6 39.4 57.3 15 68.3 66.9 66.6 59.1 #N1A 60.6 56.3 69.2 37.9 57.3 16 68.4 67.1 66.5 59.7 #NlA 61.0 57.7 69.4 44.1 57.7 17 68.6 66.6 66.6 59.2 #NIA 60.6 56.3 69.5 48.7 58.2 18 68.9 67.2 66.5 59.0 #NIA 60.3 56.4 69.3 49.5 57.2 19 67.5 66.2 66.5 58.3 #NIA 60.8 56.2 67.9 39.8 55.7 20 68.1 66.9 66.6 58.4 #NIA 60.9 57.0 69.7 41.3 57.0 21 67.9 66.8 66.1 58.7 59.1 59.7 55.1 69.7 40.9 57.9 22 68.1 66.2 65.7 58.4 57.6 57.6 54.2 69.4 43.0 56.7 23 67.8 65.8 65.4 56.9 56.6 57.7 52.3 69.4 44.7 56.0 24 68.4 66.5 65.7 57.8 56.9 58.3 53.6 70.0 35.9 58.0 25 68.7 66.6 66.3 58.9 58.0 60.0 55.5 69.3 42.7 58.4 26 66.7 65.0 64.6 57.3 56.4 57.9 54.6 67.3 44.9 54.5 27 68.5 66.8 66.1 57.8 57.4 59.1 55.5 69.3 42.9 56.2 28 68.2 66.4 66.2 58.1 57.3 59.4 55.0 68.9 45.0 55.9 29 68.1 66.3 65.3 58.0 56.5 58.7 53.9 69.2 47.3 57.4 30 68.0 66.3 65.4 58.7 57.0 58.7 53.6 69.4 47.3 57.6 31 68.6 66.5 66.1 57.9 56.9 59.1 55.7 70.0 45.0 58.2 Da s 31 31 31 31 25 31 31 31 31 31 En.Av 68.2 66.5 66.1 58.7 58.0 59.9 55.8 69.3 44.1 57.3 #NIA indicates insufficient data. -g- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION September 2006 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 68.0 66.6 66.1 58.2 57.6 59.1 54.8 69.8 48.5 57.4 2 66.4 64.6 63.9 56.3 55.5 57.4 54.0 67.3 34.4 53.7 3 65.6 63.8 62.9 55.6 54.7 56.4 52.8 67.3 47.1 54.1 4 68.2 66.4 66.0 57.6 57.3 59.0 55.4 68.3 34.7 54.9 5 68.1 66.3 65.4 57.7 57.0 58.5 54.5 68.3 37.5 55.1 6 67.6 65.9 65.4 58.0 56.7 58.8 55.3 68.9 44.7 55.6 7 67.7 65.8 65.3 59.1 57.2 .59.0 54.9 69.7 29.7 58.8 8 68.6 66.9 66.2 59.3 58.8 60.1 55.9 69.4 38.3 59.0 9 66.0 64.2 63.4 57.7 56.1 57.9 54.1 66.9 45.1 53.7 10 67.8 66.2 65.6 58.1 58.7 59.7 55.5 69.2 49.1 56.8 11 67.7 66.3 65.7 58.0 57.6 59.1 55.0 68.8 48.9 56.3 12 68.0 66.5 65.7 57.5 57.8 59.0 55.0 68.9 43.5 56.4 13 68.1 66.2 65.7 58.2 57.5 59.3 54.7 69.2 41.0 58.0 14 68.9 66.7 66.4 59.8 58.7 60.4 55.6 70.2 38.4 60.2 15 68.8 67.1 66.6 60.0 59.3 61.0 58.1 69.7 49.3 58.7 16 65.9 64.6 63.7 56.9 56.3 5$.0 54.7 65.1 42:6 52.6 17 66.8 65.4 65.1 56.4 55.8 58.9 53.5 68.8 49.0 55.0 18 67.6 65.7 64.8 57.0 56.3 57.9 53.5 68.3 46.9 55.6 19 67.4 65.7 64.6 57.5 56.9 58.6 54.3 68.3 41.1 56.5 20 68.4 66.5 65.6 58.9 55.0 59.3 55.2 69.1 42.7 57.0 21 68.8 66.7 66.3 59.5 52.5 60.0 56.1 69.7 49.5 58.5 22 69.3 66.9 66.3 60.2 58.6 60.9 57.6 69.6 41.8 57.8 23 65.5 63.8 63.2 56.8 56.0 57.4 53.7 66.2 42.9 52.3 24 67.5 65.8 66.5 57.5 57.9 60.3 54.8 68.7 44.6 55.3 25 67.8 66.2 65.7 58.5 57.7 59.5 55.3 69.5 29.0 57.6 26 67.7 66.5 65.9 58.0 57.2 58.6 55.3 68.6 41.1 57.0 27 68.0 66.3 65.8 58.1 57.8 59.2 54.9 68.4 45.5 56.0 28 68.6 66.9 66.3 58.0 57.7 59.0 54.4 68.7 43.0 56.4 29 69.0 67.2 66.5 58.3 57.7 59.4 55.3 68.6 45.2 57.1 30 66.0 64.2 63.0 56.3 55.3 56.9 53.8 65.9 42.5 54.1 Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 En.Av 67.8 66.0 65.4 58.1 57.2 59.1 55.1 68.7 45.0 56.7 #NIA indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A . ~I I~V - ~Pt1tP_CY1hPl" 7nnF1 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8N 9N 10N Alaska Air B7374 975 Average 95.8 94.0 92.8 85.4 86.8 87.2 84.8 93.5 79.1 81.6 Count 963 957 962 957 881 956 945 3 2 3 B7377 183 Average 92.8 91.3 88.6 81.0 83.0 83.2 81.0 92.0 #NIA 74.8 Count 177 172 178 178 169 175 175 3 0 3 B7378 1 Average 98.1 96.3 95.4 85.7 86.8 87..1 86.9 #NIA #NIA #NIA Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1} (1) (0) (O) {0) Aloha 67377 520 Average 95.3 93.2 91.2 84.6 84.0 86.2 83.2 94.7 #N/A 79.5 Count (509} (498) (511) (512) (464) (505) (452) (4) (0) (3) America West A320 540 Average 92.5 91.2 90.4 84.7 83.3 84.3 80.9 89.5 #NIA 80.6 Count 533 531 532 532 481 528 444 1 0 1 B7373 272 Average 95.9 93.8 92.0 85.6 84.5 86.8 83.2 93.2 #NIA 79.0 Count 264 266 267 270 248 263 267 2 0 1 B757 194 Average 95.5 94.8 91.7 84.7 83.3 84.2 80.9 90.8 #NIA 78.3 Count (188) (188) (188) (184) (171) (186) (150) (3) (0} (2} American B7378 867 Average 99.1 96.7 96.6 88.3 86.9 88.8 84.4 94.1 80.0 81.0 Count 849 840 851) 853 781 837 834 5 1 4 8757 333 Average 96.3 94.7 92.8 86.3 85.9 87.7 84.1 92.2 #N/A 80.7 Count (327 329 (325 (328) (297 (323) (325 2) 0} 2 MD80 191 Average 101.0 99.8 99.2 92.1 92.2 93.7 90.4 101.8 84.1 87.8 Count (183) (176) (184) (182) (169) (181) (174) (5) (3) (2) Continental 87373 258 Average 96.5 94.2 94.4 87.9 86.8 89.3 85.4 94.5 19.9 81.8 Count 212) (210 (218) (218) (202 210 214 39 8 14 B7377 488 Average 96.5 94.4 93.6 86.1 85.3 87.3 83.6 95.2 82.0 80.5 Count (466) (470) (470) (470) (430) (463) (457) (13) (5) (3) Delta B7373 1 Average 95.9 92.8 89.9 84.6 83.2 86.1 80.4 #NIA #NIA #NIA Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 B7378 74 Average 95.4 93.3 90.3 84.3 83.3 85.4 82.8 91.8 #N/A 83.1 Count 71 69 72 72 66 72 71 1 0 1 B757 400 Average 96.5 94.5 94.3 87.0 85.9 86.7 83.1 93.1 #N/A 80.4 Count 382 379 385 384 352 383 372 13 0 5 MD90 202 Average 92.0 90.4 90.3 82.5 82.6 84.8 81.9 #NIA #NIA #NIA Count (200) (200) (200) (195) (177) (194) (192) (0) (0) (0) FedEx A300 1 Average 98.6 96.8 95.2 89.2 88.1 89.6 86.0 #NIA #NIA #NIA Count 25 25 25 25 23 25 25 0 0 0 4 A310 38 Average 98.6 96.7 95.4 89.5 88.3 90.3 86.2 #NIA #N/A #NlA Count (38) (38) (38) (37) (34) (37) (37) (0} (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A319 274 Average 93.7 91.4 91.9 85.7 84.7 85.3 81.0 90.1 #NIA 77.4 Count (269) (271) (268) (269) (249) (266) (245) (3) (0) (1) Mesa Airlines CRJ9 164 Average 92.4 90.9 93.1 84.4 83.4 86.3 80.2 #NIA #NIA #NIA Count (163) (163) (159) (160} (146) (163) {127} (0) (0) (0) Northwest A320 268 Average 95.9 93.6 93.4 86.2 84.8 85.6 81.6 93.2 #N/A 81.9 Count {263) (263) (262) (262) (240) (262) (252) (3) (0) (2) Southwest B7373 74 Average 94.8 92.9 91.0 84.3 84.3 86.0 83.1 #NIA #NIA #N/A Count 73 73 70 73 64 71 66 0 0 0 B7377 383 Average 92.2 90.7 87.9 81.3 80.9 81.7 80.2 89.3 #NIA 75.6 Count (378) (379) (377) (372) (334) (373) (291) (2) (0) (1) United A320 508 Average 91.8 90.4 90.6 84.3 83.1 84.8 82.7 89.1 #N/A #NIA Count 502) 499) (501) (503 461) (503 484) (2) 0) (0) 67373 10 Average 93.7 92.2 91.1 85.2 85.0 85.8 83.3 #NIA #NIA #NIA Count (10 (10) (10) (10) (9) (10) (9) (0 0 (0 B757 460 Average 94.1 92.3 91.2 84.0 84.0 85.3 82.7 93.0 #NIA 74.4 Count (448) (448} (450) (453) (410} (449) (446) (4} (0} (1) UPS B757 58 Average 96.9 95.5 93.7 86.0 84.9 86.3 81.1 #NIA #NIA #NIA Count (57) (58) (56) (57) (51 } (57) (54) (0) (0) (0) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E July -September 2006 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Si te 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8N 9N 10N Alaska Air B7377 347 Average 91.7 90.2 87.7 80.6 82.5 82.7 8 .4 91.3 N A 77.4 Count (342) (344} (342) (342) (314) (335) (324) (1) (0} (1) America West A320 168 Average 90.3 89.6 88.9 83.8 82.0 82.7 79.3 #NIA #NIA #NIA Count (168) (164) (165) (167} (150) (165) (84} (0} (0) (0) Southwest B7377 2722 Average 91.1 89.9 86.2 80.9 80.3 81.2 79.1 90.8 #NIA 78.1 Count (2677) (2656) (2678) (2607) (2377) (2664) (2090) (15) (0) (5) United B757 280 Average 91.7 90.3 88.5 82.2 81.7 83.2 80.9 88.9 #NIA 75.6 Count (276) (268) (276) (267) (244) (271) (270) (1) (0) (1) -11- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter July -September 2006 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8N 9 10N American Eagle E140 1211 Average 87.0 85.4 88.4 79.5 78.7 80.8 79.1 86.8 N A A Count (1194) (1186) (1194) (981) (639) (1181) (126) (4) (0) (0) SkyWest CL60 183 Average 85.8 83.2 88.0 78.2 78.6 80.7 77.9 86.8 #N!A #N!A Count 179 179 180 60 21 179 13 2 0 0 CRJ7 184 Average 89.4 87.5 87.2 79.8 78.8 81.5 79.3 90.9 #N/A #NIA Count (179) (180 181 (135) 77 178 126 3 0) 0 E120 511 Average 81.9 81.8 82.2 78.2 81.3 78.5 80.0 81.0 #N!A #NIA Count (502) (486) (503) (63) (229) (482) (49) (3) (0) (0) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation July -September 2006 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1 5 7 enera viation et verage Count (3797} (3670) (3715) (2028) (1296) (3206) (1195) (55) (0) (6) -12- TABLE ATR rARR1F.R OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Alaska Air AS B7374 4,343 4,850 7,961 7,130 5,953 67377 7,196 7,089 4,286 4,439 2,962 B7378 128 2 Aloha AQ B7377 2,182 2,910 3,399 3,685 2,908 America Vilest AW A319 631 2,883 1,201 2,364 2,845 A320 1,888 2,955 3,390 3,050 1,609 B7373 7,931 3,184 2,559 2,746 1,758 B757 208 26 2 755 694 American AA B7378 6,200 4,663 9,226 6,896 5,019 B757 7,670 7,612 691 1,996 2,013 MD80 2,606 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,255 Continental CO 87373 2 2 B7375 1,744 1,640 1,303 1,767 1,361 B7377 3,050 3,378 3,689 3,529 2,884 B7378 4 12 2 B757 4 Delta DL B7373 1,016 1,243 9 B7378 397 878 87 131 256 B757 2,105 2,503 4,077 3,859 2,471 MD90 3,610 2,597 1,524 1,572 1,343 FedEx FM A300 10 26 20 4 54 A310 496 476 481 496 323 a300 2 a310 2 1 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 70 1,114 11 A319 10 379 1,022 1,034 1,617 B7373 214 1,046 2 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1,208 2,266 456 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 994 Midwest YX B717 302 1,210 238 Northwest NW A319 854 2,790 2,814 2,793 1,545 A320 2,003 5l 38 40 38 Southwest W N B7373 1,827 252 176 2 148 B7375 8,744 8,231 1,358 2 B7377 6,209 10,498 19,745 22,022 17,703 UPS 5X B757 452 448 472 476 356 US Airways US A319 1,456 895 A320 4 United UA A319 2,384 2,211 1,556 1,760 1,553 A320 2,183 2,403 3,173 2,086 999 B7373 70 10 9 2 68 B7375 103 8 8 B757 6,045 6,492 6,498 5,800 4,793 -13- TABLE 10 A1RC.RAFT OPFRATTONAI, HISTORY Aircraft Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 A300 10 26 20 4 56 A310 496 476 481 498 324 A318 2 70 1,114 11 A319 5, 335 9,158 6, 593 7, 951 7, 560 A320 6,074 5,419 6,601 5,176 2,646 B717 302 1,210 238 B7373 9,830 3,660 4,808 3,995 1,983 B7374 4,343 4,850 7,961 7,130 5,953 B7375 10,591 9,879 2,661 1,769 1,369 B7377 18,637 23,875 31,119 33,675 26,457 B7378 6, 597 5, 545 9,313 7,167 5,279 B757 16,480 17,085 11, 740 12,886 10,327 CL60 1,208 2,266 456 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 994 MD80 2,606 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,255 MD90 3,610 2,597 1,524 1,572 1,343 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 . 15,000 10,000 5, 000 0 boo ~,~~ ~,~~ ~,~o, ~~~ ~~1 ~,~~ ~~~ ~~h ~~1 ~,~~ ~~1 ~~0 Q-~~ Oho O~0 By Year 2002 ^ 2003 ^ 2004 ^ 2005 ^ 2006 -14- TABLE 11 ATR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Alaska Air AS B7374 5.942 6.644 10.866 9.770 10.894 B7377 9.866 9.710 5.863 6.085 5.432 B7378 0.175 0.004 Aloha AQ B7377 2.986 3.984 4.645 5.058 5.319 America West AW A319 0.863 3.937 1.634 3.244 5.205 A320 2.578 4.047 4.634 4.178 2.967 B7373 10.877 4.373 3.495 3.762 3.220 B757 0.285 0.036 0.003 1.033 1.267 American AA B7378 8.493 6.386 12.609 9.452 9.190 B757 10.507 10.430 0.945 2.734 3.692 MD80 3.575 1.433 3.852 3.433 2.304 Continental CO B7373 0.003 0.003 B7375 2.386 2.247 1.781 2.436 2.498 B7377 4.178 4.627 5.038 4.819 5.278 B7378 0.005 0.016 0.004 B757 0.005 Delta DL B7373 1.385 1.704 0.018 B7378 0.542 1.200 0.120 0.181 0.469 B757 2.882 3.425 5.571 5.290 4.531 M D90 4.937 3.562 2.082 2.153 2.454 FedEx FM A300 0.014 0.036 0.027 0.005 0.099 A310 0.679 0.652 0.656 0.677 0.593 a300 0.004 a310 0.003 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 0.003 0.096 1.526 0.022 A319 0.014 0.518 1.393 1.416 2.960 B7373 0.293 1.432 0.003 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1.655 3.104 0.623 0.003 CRJ9 3.238 1.995 1.821 Midwest YX B717 0.414 1.650 0.326 Northwest NW A319 1.173 3.822 3.844 3.827 2.832 A320 2.742 0.079 0.052 0.055 0.070 Southwest W N B7373 2.512 0.345 0.240 0.003 0.271 B7375 11.981 11.279 1.855 0.003 B7377 8.493 14.378 26.975 30.173 32.432 UPS 5X B757 0.619 0.614 0.645 0.652 0.652 US Airways US A319 1.997 1.227 A320 0.005 United UA A319 3.277 3.038 2.126 2.416 2.846 A320 2.978 3.279 4.331 2.852 1.828 B7373 0.096 0.014 0.011 0.003 0.125 B7375 0.140 0.011 0.015 B757 8.288 8.896 8.891 7.945 8.784 -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: September 21, 2006 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Airport Statistics Bonnie Frisch summarized the statistics from the J`1VA Monthly Airport Statistics for August 2006. 2. Additional topic discussions andlor comments and questions Mr. Richard Cox, consultant to the community of Emerald Bay, reported that he continues to monitor the altitudes of departing flights crossing over the coastline in the vicinity of Emerald Bay, and shared his findings. Based on his observations, he stated that progress is being made, and that he continues to work with the FAA and the airlines to prevent aircraft from crossing the coastline at low altitudes. Additionally, Mr. Cox explained that he is working with the FAA to get aircraft departing to certain destinations ,such as Minneapolis, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City and Denver to make right turns to the extent possible. He has observed that some carriers are making these right turns. Ms. Loren Blackwood of P.A.C. asked Mr. Cox about health studies on low altitude flying. Mr. Cox stated that such studies would be done by the EPA generally. Ms. Melinda Seely of AirFair explained that her organization tried looking into this issue with water and air and found that due to limitations in current science it is hard to identify the source of pollutants. Mr. Cox explained that low flying aircraft are the purview of the FAA not the airport. He further stated that an airspace redesign had been planned for Southern California airspace including that of JWA. He added that although the airspace redesign project lost its funding, there is still potential in the future. Ms. Seely stated that communities need to talk to legislators to get funding for the airspace redesign. Ms. Blackwood asked how many people would be needed to effectively influence legislators. Mr. Cox explained that he had spent time on Capitol Hill and that such an effort requires -16- communities and citizens to engage in letter-writing and for local government officials to travel to Washington D.C. for one-on-one meetings. Ms. Seely stated that AirFair would be meeting with Congressman Campbell next week. Mr. Cox stated that it is important to have Congressional staffers on your side because they influence the representatives. Ms. Blackwood explained that at her residence on Mesa Drive she is heavily impacted by the noise. She feels this noise probably has a health impact, and she wants to get involved and get the community involved. Mr. Cox explained that the FAA's Tracon facility staff have been helpful in implementing changes, and that if it were up to Tracon, the changes that Emerald Bay wanted would have occurred by now. Mr. Charles Griffin, a local resident, discussed the implications of the passage of Assembly Bill 32, which he said requires reduction in C0~ to 1990 levels. He stated that aircraft are major producers of COQ. 3. Tentative date for next meeting December 14, 2006 is the tentative date for the next Noise Abatement Committee meeting. -17- NAC Roster N- Loren Blackwood Richard Cox Joseph Deaton Melinda Seely Charles Griffin David Chan Eric Freed Bonnie Frisch Silvia Zavala September 21, 2006 ORGANIZATION P.A.C. Aviation Advocates (Emerald Bay, Newport Beach) Resident, Newport Beach AirFair Resident John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport -18- NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: October 1, 2006 through December 31, 200b Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 136th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-SS: 324'/2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-8N:17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-lON:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area" -1- r~ ~ r~~ure i JOHN WAYNE NOISE MONITORING LOCATION 0 1 2 3 4 5 Scale In miles N JWAdivisior~Praject/Govt~1C~_mrr~~Relr~tioni~~bnom~st.d~n AIRPORT STATIONS (NMS) MAP -2- Figure 2 a s . ~~ e ~: y. 3" n ' ~ ~ i< _. •,~ s " ~' ~ _ ., ~ ~ -. H Y~ /y' (' r .t ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ w ,, •. .. . ,~. 'x s 1 Y' u ~! ` , y ~ ~~ .. 4 ., ~ ~~pY ~ r ~ 14.~ ~ ~ rah „~#~~rt~'~, _ ~~ ~ ~A "~. 4' ,.~~ std . \$ a ~ A ~ ~ *~ ,,'~~~ h ~~ ~ .{ ~ ~ .~ ~'` , A i a ~""~" u ~ , j ~ _ ~/ u , ~ ~ 1 ~ a , + ,. + ail ' i - "~. ~~. >. ~~ ~~ ~ ,~~, ~. ~~ ,. ~ , M f ~ x „'°' ,Ip ~ wy r. ".. ~, 4 :, s' ~ a ,~ 1 ~r .~ ~~ ~ ~. ,l e ~ ~ ,. - ~ ~ x .' ~, ~t ~ ~'! .~•'* ~- ~ r ~I .~ ..~ _ ~ ~ ~, ~. , ~' ~M: ,, ~ m,. r .. r ~k r a ` ~ ~ x~. r•. z; a ~° o .~ at ~; , ~ .r z ~' .. q 1 ~ ~~ -' ;: ~ ~. ! P .. ~ ~ ~ ~,~ a .... c ~, ~~ ,~ "gyp a ,,: ~ r ~ W M Y~ ~' . ,. f ~~ r, " ~~ W ' ~ ~I Ao ~ ~.: ~- ~ ~v + .. w k' ~ __ ~~ ~ `. ~ .' .,,~ ~~ x `~ .,. , ~ ,~ ~ , ~ . ~ 1 ;. ,, ~ t~l, _ ~ ~ ; ,. d ~. . ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~ r ~« ~~ n~ ,~ . ~: .. _. ~ u s. , ; ` ~~ ai. . ~ it ,~, t ~+ ;~.. \ -*i ~.t~' ~ _7 y~ Sri! i ~ ~ s ' P . e ~~ ~F; a,a' °1.<. ~ ^ y m ~~ rn'° ' ~ , `[!. w ' 6 ~~~ s4 ;r~ P "'~'?~" c ° " A ; ~ ~',i Y ~A~£~ ~ ~`s ` ~ Il ~~rt 4x ! ~. r ~. r ~~ - ,. ,_ ~ .~ a ~~ x :- .~ ~ , a r ~,. i~ .- •' .- ~ °~ a , ~'. ,, p , .• ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~, JII ~ • ;ay y~, r a~ h' ~ + r fir' ~ ~,~~ .. t ~ , w ~ i n P QQ + ~ , ' ~n, ' "` e m „ .;. +. r ~~~ ~. „ *" ~~ .~ .. ~ ~~ >> ` , . ~ A ., . . 7 ; ' ' . ~, ` ,,, ~; "1 ~, a k !_4i, ~. ° ,-, ~ ~ i - ~ ~t ,. , .~ - ~, ,. , ~ '~ ~, ~ `4, t F` ~. V r:7~" µ , ~, .. ~. 4: ~ R . a~ ~ ~~ ~~, .3m ~ ~ • , , , y ®, m ~~ ,~ a R ... k ,! ~~ . ~~ , T X13 ~ afi•,.~.. '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . u~ I~ ~, ' ~~ ~ ~ "~*~ ~, ~ Y bi i. .Y. R .e.. .. I ~, ,,, a. _ 1 ~. ~ ~: ~ ~,~ _. , ~, J~ , ,~.. , ' 1 ~~ ~ ~, ~ Noise Monitors __ _~~ Single Family Residential ___--- 65 dB CNEL Contour ~___I Multi-Family Residential STATISTICS: ~ (~c ea Incompatible Land Use: 6.0 Acres or .009 square miles Number of Dwellings: 75 January 2006 'December 2006 Number of People: 187.5 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unity ~ Nl~~~n~e Gr~~~~~~.-~s~,~~~~~~~r~~s~ -3- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 1 1. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS llrtnhar - narpmhPr AMR Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Average Daily Jet Prop Operations 2} Jet Operations October 8,520 352 3,188 30,020 378 November 8,097 316 2,944 27,979 368 December 8,323 331 2,720 25,732 356 Fourth Quarter 24,940 999 8,852 83,731 367 Twelve Months 01/01/06 -12131106 99,930 4,071 35,980 347,194 372 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) October -December 2006 Jet Carrier Military Prop Carrier GA Jet GA Other 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending December 31, 2006, 75 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this is the same number of dwelling units -4- 3/14107 in the "Noise Impacted Area" as for the previous twelve month period ending September 30, 2006. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the "Noise Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program, approximately 77 general agriculture (A-1) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993,124 residences have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAIP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym "SAH AIP".)During the 4th quarter of 2006, no additional residences have been made compatible through the County's SAH AIP. A total of 486 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AIP. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (October 1, 200b -December 31, 2006) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period October 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006, the Office received 219 complaints from citizens. This is a 59.1 % decrease from the 535 complaints received last quarter. It is a 84.0% increase from the 119 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 50 I 26 25 I 19 15 g 10 $ 8 g 10 11 5 4 5 3 A 2 ~~ ,~a J~~ a~ ~~ ~o or oy~ ~a ,~~~ or ~~ . roe ~a r~5 ,~~ ~~ ~ ~~ o~~ ~o y~~ ~~~~ . \ ~~ boa ~o~ ~~~~ ~~5 ~o~ ,~~~ aP ~~~ p'~ ~ G ~~ ,~~ \ ~~ ~~~ ~~ 0 °~ ~ ~ go ao ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ o ~ o 0 ~ ~'~ Q ~ ~~ a v` ° Q ~ ~ a ono ~~ ~~ ~ o~ aP o ~~o G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Community -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 1106 through 12106 Values in dB at Each Site Period --- NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Jan 2006 66.4 65.0 65.4 57.8 57.1 60.1 55.2 67.4 47.2 56.4 # Da s 31 31 31 29 31 31 31 31 31 29 Feb 2006 67.0 65.7 65.1 58.0 57.4 59.4 55.5 68.1 47.8 56.4 # Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 Mar 2006 67.7 66.3 65.6 59.1 58.0 59.9 56.7 68.9 45.0 58.0 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 26 31 31 31 Q-12006 67.1 65.7 65.4 58.4 57.5 59.8 55.8 68.2 46.7 57.0 # Days 90 90 90 88 90 90 85 90 90 88 Apr 2006 67.7 66.3 65.8 59.2 58.5 60.0 57.0 68.9 45.2 57.8 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 22 30 30 30 May 2006 67.5 66.1 65.4 58.7 58.0 59.6 55.9 68.9 45.1 57.8 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 29 31 Jun 2006 67.9 66.4 65.9 58.7 58.3 60.0 56.2 69.3 46.1 57.2 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Q-2 2006 67.7 66.3 65.7 58.9 58.3 59.9 56.4 69.0 45.5 57.6 # Days 91 91 91 91 91 91 82 91 89 91 Ju12006 67.9 66.1 65.7 58.2 57.6 59.4 56.3 68.9 43.1 56.6 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Aug 2006 68.2 66.5 66.1 58.7 58.0 59.9 55.8 69.3 44.1 57.3 # Da s 31 31 31 31 25 31 31 31 31 31 Sep 2006 67.8 66.0 65.4 58.1 51.2 59.1 55.1 68.7 45.0 56.7 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Q-3 2006 68.0 66.2 65.8 58.4 57.6 59.5 55.8 69.0 44.1 56.9 # Days 92 92 92 92 86 92 92 92 91 92 Oct 2006 67.6 65.8 65.4 58.5 57.7 59.5 55.9 68.7 46.4 57.2 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Nov 2006 67.6 66.1 65.6 58.3 57.6 59.7 55.7 68.8 46.5 57.2 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 Dec 2006 66.7 65.2 65.2 57.4 56.7 59.5 54.9 68.1 46.4 55.9 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Q-4 2006 67.3 65.7 65.4 58.1 57.4 59.6 55.5 68.6 46.4 56.8 # Da s 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 91 92 Q-12006 t hru Q-4 2006 Total 67.5 66.0 65.6 58.4 57.7 59.7 55.9 68.7 45.8 57.1 # Days 365 365 365 363 359 365 351 365 361 363 Q-4 2005 thru Q-3 2006 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 67.6 66.1 65.6 58.5 57.9 59.8 56.3 68.7 46.7 57.1 # Days 364 365 364 358 355 355 316 361 346 357 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.0 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.5 0.0 -0.9 -0.1 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION October 2006 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 68.0 66.3 65.1 58.4 58.0 59.8 57.1 69.5 43.4 58.0 2 67.4 65.9 64.8 58:4 57.7 59.2 55.1 68.5 43.6 57.0 3 67.2 65.8 65.3 58.9 57.8 59.5 56.3 69.0 40.1 57.0 4 68.2 67.0 66.1 59.5 58.2 60.3 56.4 69.0 50.0 57.6 5 68.5 66.9 66.2 58.9 59.0 60.6 57.0 69.4 47.8 58.0 6 68.8 66.9 66.8 60.4 59.5 60.6 57.6 69.3 45.6 58.1 7 65.8 64.0 63.5 57.5 56.5 57.6 54.2 66.1 47.5 54.3 8 67.2 65.5 65.1 58.4 57.9 59.6 56.8 69.2 42.5 58.2 9 68.6 66.7 65.8 59.7 58.4 60.2 56.3 69.1 32.7 59.2 10 67.7 65.7 65.2 59.0 57.9 59.7 55.8 68.5 37.5 56.9 11 68.0 66.5 65.8 58.9 58.1 59.8 56.6 69.3 49.6 57.0 12 68.4 66.4 66.1 59.8 58.9 60.5 57.1 69.8 42.1 58.8 13 69.2 67.0 66.8 60.5 59.3 60.8 57.5 69.6 43.4 58.3 14 66.3 64.3 63.3 57.1 56.3 57.9 54.9 67.2 44.1 55.9 15 68.4 66.7 67.6 59.1 58.7 61.8 57.5 69.3 46.5 57.7 16 68.3 66.5 66.3 59.8 59.2 60.6 57.4 69.4 38.7 58.9 17 67.5 66.1 65.0 59.0 58.3 59.4 56.2 68.7 42.3 57.4 18 64.7 63.6 66.4 55.7 56.7 61.3 55.1 68.3 50.6 53.3 19 67.0 65.5 65.4 56.6 56.5 59.5 54.4 68.0 53.6 54.3 20 68.6 66.7 66.1 58.3 58.0 59.5 56.0 68.9 40.9 56.2 21 66.2 64.5 63.8 56.8 55.7 57.4 54.4 66.6 44.8 53.9 22 68.0 66.2 65.3 57.4 56.8 58.8 55.4 69.8 48.6 56.7 23 67.7 66.1 65.2 57.8 57.0 58.5 54.6 68.7 42.9 56.7 24 67.6 65.8 64.8 58.6 57.2 59.0 55.1 68.9 39.5 58.5 25 67.9 66.4 65.8 58.8 58.1 59.1 55.6 69.5 45.4 58.0 26 66.0 63.2 64.6 56.2 54.7 58.6 52.4 67.0 46.4 51.0 27 67.3 65.5 64.7 56.9 56.3 58.1 54.4 67.8 51.1 55.0 28 65.0 63.3 62.2 54.9 53.6 55.7 51.7 66.0 44.3 51.9 29 67.7 66.1 65.1 58.8 58.1 59.4 55.5 69.6 46.5 59.3 30 67.3 65.1 64.9 59.0 57.8 59.3 57.8 69.4 38.2 59.2 31 66.1 64.7 63.9 58.3 57.2 58.6 54.5 68.2 45.5 58.0 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 En.Av 67.6 65.8 65.4 58.5 57.7 59.5 55.9 68.7 46.4 57.2 #NlA indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION November 2006 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N~ 1 68.0 65.2 65.8 58.7 58.2 59.9 55.8 69.1 42.4 58.7 2 68.4 66.9 66.1 58.7 58.9 60.4 56.7 69.5 42.4 58.8 3 69.1 67.5 66.5 59.2 58.4 60.1 56.6 69.9 44.4 59.5 4 66.2 64.7 64.1 56.5 56.1 57.8 56.8 66.7 #N/A 53.7 5 67.6 66.1 65.3 57.5 57.0 58.7 55.5 68.8 37.2 55.1 6 67.2 65.5 65.2 56.6 56.1 59.1 54.6 66.9 50.5 53.3 7 67.2 65.4 64.7 57.4 56.3 58.3 54.5 68.0 49.3 54.9 8 67.1 65.4 65.1 58.2 57.1 58.9 54.8 69.4 50.8 59.2 9 68.5 66.6 65.9 59.3 58.7 60.0 56.7 69.5 49.9 58.2 10 69.0 67.5 66.8 59.0 59.0 60.4 56.5 69.1 45.1 56.6 11 65.6 64.3 62.9 57.0 56.4 51.4 53.9 67.2 43.0 56.0 12 68.2 66.7 65.9 58.6 58.1 60.1 56.3 68.4 50.8 55.7 13 67.7 65.9 65.5 58.5 57.6 59.4 55.1 69.3 49.1 57.7 14 68.0 66.8 65.6 59.0 58.2 59.4 55.8 69.0 44.0 57.8 15 68.3 66.3 65.8 58.5 57.6 59.7 55.9 68.7 43.8 55.7 16 68.2 66.9 65.9 58.8 58.0 59.6 56.0 70.1 39.9 58.0 17 69.4 68.0 67.3 59.9 59.3 60.9 57.3 70.2 47.0 59.1 18 66.8 65.1 65.0 57.1 56.6 58.2 55.1 66.7 32.4 55.0 19 67.7 66.2 65.0 51.2 56.5 58.4 54.9 67.9 46.7 54.3 20 67.1 66.0 64.3 57.2 56.1 58.1. 54.3 68.5 49.0 54.7 21 68.6 66.9 66.1 59.6 58.7 60.4 56.2 70.1 42.3 59.5 22 69.0 67.3 66.5 60.3 59.3 61.4 56.5 69.9 45.2 59.1 23 65.9 64.5 63.1 57.5 56.2 57.8 53.6 66.4 42.9 54.7 24 66.2 64.8 63.7 58.1 57.0 58.7 55.5 68.5 48.2 57.5 25 67.2 65.5 64.5 58.7 57.5 59.1 55.6 67.9 46.7 56.6 26 68.5 66.9 66.1 59.9 59.3 60.8 57.4 70.1 38.8 58.8 27 68.1 66.8 66.1 59.5 59.6 60.6 57.4 70.3 43.2 59.6 28 67.8 66.2 65.6 59.7 58.8 59.9 56.3 69.6 43.1 58.7 29 57.9 59.9 69.0 48.0 42.8 63.5 50.2 61.5 48.1 46.5 30 64.3 62.8 62.3 53.8 52.3 56.2 48.7 67.3 40.6 52.2 Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 En.Av 67.6 66.1 65.6 58.3 57.6 59.7 55.7 68.8 46.5 57.2 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -g- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION December 2006 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N- 10N 1 67.7 66.2 65.2 57.5 56.1 58.2 53.8 69.3 47.2 55.8 2 55.4 55.0 64.7 38.8 45.8 60.1 47.5 60.4 48.9 43.9 3 55.5 52.0 65.8 34.8 41.9 60.4 45.8 61.6 34.8 40.4 4 63.8 62.4 62.1 53.1 51.3 55.3 47.1 67.3 44.4 52.0 5 66.2 64.8 63.5 56.0 54.1 56.7 51.7 67.9 42.5 53.0 6 68.4 66.4 65.3 56.7 55.6 58.0 53.4 68.5 45.5 53.0 7 68.4 67.0 66.3 58.0 57.3 59.9 56.3 68.9 44.3 54.9 8 68.5 66.8 65.7 59.6 57.6 59.5 55.4 69.7 47.8 58.4 9 65.4 64.1 63.1 57.2 55.7 57.4 54.4 67.2 42.0 56.7 10 67.6 66.2 65.4 58.3 58.5 59.6 56.0 69.5 38.9 59.0 11 67.8 66.3 65.6 59.3 58.5 59.9 56.5 69.0 47.5 57.2 12 67.2 65.9 65.0 58.6 58.0 59.2 56.0 68.8 43.5 56.1 13 67.8 66.4 65.6 58.9 58.5 60.3 56.7 68.7 42.6 56.4 14 68.1 66.5 65.7 59.0 58.1 59.9 56.5 68.8 44.8 57.2 15 68.4 67.0 66.0 58.2 57.9 59.3 55.6 70.0 41.8 60.2 16 65.9 64.1 63.1 58.2 57.3 57.8 55.5 67.5 45.6 56.9 17 66.8 65.3 64.2 58.1 57.4 58.8 56.2 68.5 46.3 56.9 18 58.9 58.1 67.8 46.5 50.9 63.8 56.8 63.6 46.9 47.6 19 67.1 65.5 64.9 58.3 57.5 59.0 55.4 68.3 44.9 56.2 20 67.6 65.9 65.6 59.2 58.3 59.6 56.0 68.6 46.5 57.1 21 68.9 67.5 66.6 59.7 58.9 60.9 57.0 68.9 49.4 56.8 22 64.7 63.5 65.1 56.0 55.8 60.9 53.6 69.2 49.8 55.5 23 64.9 63.4 63.5 55.1 54.5 57.4 52.0 67.4 46.3 54.2 24 65.5 63.9 63.0 56.2 55.0 56.3 52.7 66.4 47.6 53.1 25 66.6 65.1 63.7 56.6 55.7 57.0 53.8 67.8 47.5 54.1 26 68.2 67.0 65.9 58.4 57.9 59.3 56.1 69.5 45.0 57.0 27 68.1 66.5 65.6 58.4 59.1 60.1 56.5 69.2 45.6 57.5 28 65.2 63.1 67.8 55.0 55.3 63.5 52.8 64.8 47.0 51.8 29 66.2 64.8 64.4 57.8 56.5 58.9 54.4 69.1 51.5 56.1 30 66.9 65.1 64.6 58.4 56.7 58.3 54.4 67.3 47.3 53.9 31 66.4 65.0 64.2 57.9 57.0 58.3 54.7 68.1 42.5 57.0 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 En.Av 66.7 65.2 65.2 57.4 56.7 59.5 54.9 68.1 46.4 55.9 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A October -December 2006 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8N 9N 10N Alaska Air B7374 617 Average 95.5 93.7 92.6 85.6 86.8 87.1 84.9 91.5 82.0 82.2 Count (555 557) (564) 567 569) 564) 557 33 22 26 87377 500 Average 93.1 91.7 88.9 81.5 83.3 83.5 81.6 89.8 88.0 77.3 Count (444) (434) (439) (442) (449) (442) (429} (43) (4) (15) Aloha B7377 514 Average 94.8 92.8 90.7 84.6 83.9 85.8 83.4 92.1 85.2 80.6 Count (445) (433) (446) (444) (437) (441) (408) (54) (21) (27) America West A320 502 Average 92.6 91.4 90.5 85.3 84.0 85.1 81.5 87.7 80.1 80.3 Count (471) 468) 468 468 468 464 442 26 3 11 B7373 256 Average 95.8 93.8 91.8 85.7 84.7 86.7 83.4 90.7 82.3 80.5 Count (214 211) (220) (222 (223) 218 215 22 15 14 B757 198 Average 95.1 94.6 91.3 84.8 83.7 84.6 81.5 89.6 81.8 77.8 Count (163) (160) (171) (170) (164) (164) (154) (21) (7) (8) American B7378 859 Average 98.7 96.4 95.8 88.4 86.8 88.5 84.5 91.9 79.9 80.7 Count (769) (741) (769) (767 777) 761) 753 68 29 39 B757 329 Average 95.7 94.1 92.1 85.9 85.5 87.1 84.3 90.1 81.5 80.0 Count 282) 285) (290 (293) 293 288 284 26 9 12 MD80 363 Average 99.6 98.5 98.0 91.2 91.2 93.0 89.8 98.7 85.1 85.2 Count (316) (311) (321 } (327) (327) (326) (312) (25) (25) (22} Continental B7373 228 Average 96.4 94.1 94.3 88.0 87.0 88.8 85.3 94.4 82.6 80.8 Count (147 (142) (148 146} 149) 145 141 68 39 40 B7377 414 Average 96.3 94.2 93.3 86.1 85.1 86.8 83.6 93.6 81.2 80.0 Count 359 (355) 361 363) 366 361 357 36 19 17 B7378 1 Average 98.5 96.3 95.8 87.2 84.5 84.1 78.5 #N/A #NIA #N!A Count (1} (1) (1) (1) (1) (1} (1) (0) (0) (0) Delta B7378 11 Average 94.5 92.9 90.7 85.3 84.7 86.8 83.1 90.7 #NIA 79.4 Count 7 6) (7 7 7) 6 7 4 0 2 B757 396 Average 96.0 94.1 93.6 87.1 86.0 86.6 83.6 90.3 79.7 80.4 Count 349 335) 350) 343) (348 348 335 36) 9 17 MD90 249 Average 91.7 90.5 90.0 82.8 82.8 84.6 82.0 89.8 80.0 77.9 Count (225) (226} (227) (217) (213) (228) (214) (14) (1) (7) FedEx A300 21 Average 98.0 96.6 94.7 88.0 89.3 89.6 86.2 93.7 #NIA #NIA Count 20 20 20 20 20 20 18 1 0 0 A310 41 Average 98.8 96.8 95.2 88.1 88.8 89.5 86.4 90.0 82.2 81.5 Count (39) (39) (39) (39) (39) (39) (37) (2) (1) (1) Frontier Airlines A318 1 Average #NIA #NIA #NIA #NIA #NIA #NIA #NIA 81.3 #NIA #NIA Count 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 A319 261 Average 93.2 91.2 91.5 85.9 84.8 85.4 81.6 87.7 79.7 77.8 Count (233) (236) (237) (240) (238) (236) (220) (16) (3) (7) Mesa Airlines CRJ9 165 Average 92.3 90.8 92.8 84.6 83.3 86.2 80.1 87.0 #NIA #NIA Count (158) (158} (155) (157) (-157) (158) (133) (7) (0) (0) Northwest A320 269 Average 95.6 93.4 93.0 86.4 85.2 85.9 82.5 90.3 82.9 79.0 Count (233) (233) (236) (236) (237) (234) (226) (23) (4) (7) Southwest B7373 127 Average 94.2 92.3 90.7 84.2 83.9 85.7 82.3 89.5 78.7 84.3 Count 122 120 120 121 120 121 113 5 1 2 B7377 329 Average 92.2 90.7 87.2 81.5 80.9 81.9 79.7 89.8 79.7 80.0 Count (295) (289) (293} (291 } (285) (296) (242) (27) (8) (8) United A320 511 Average 91.5 90.3 90.2 84.7 83.4 85.1 83.0 86.7 79.7 79.5 Count 469 461 463 472 469 470 455 32 4 8 B7373 2 Average 96.0 93.9 94.2 87.1 87.0 88.2 84.7 #NIA #N!A #NIA Count 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 B757 444 Average 93.4 91.8 90.3 83.5 83.5 84.9 82.6 90.2 82.5 79.1 Count (388} (374) (391) (385) (393) (388) (386) (42) (9) (19) UPS B757 62 Average 96.6 95.5 93.5 85.9 85.2 86.2 81.5 84.7 #NIA #NIA Count (59) (59) (58) (59) (59) (59) (59) (3) (0) (0) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E October -December 2006 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS S ite 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8N 9 10N Alaska Air B7377 348 Average 92.1 90.7 88.1 81.4 83.0 83.1 81.0 88.2 78.4 77.3 Count (317) (311) (315) (309) (320) (313) (307) (22) (2) (6) America West A320 166 Average 90.3 89.6 89.0 84.3 82.7 83.4 80.1 84.4 #N!A #NIA Count (151) (148) (148) (150) (149) (149} (118) (15) (0) (0} Southwest B7377 2894 Average 91.4 90.2 86.4 81.3 80.7 81.6 79.2 89.4 79.8 78.0 Count (2626) (2590) (2616) (2575) (2510) (2623) (2221) (212) (43) (52) United B757 222 Average 91.0 89.9 88.1 82.1 81.4 83.6 81.5 87.4 85.7 77.2 Count (19l) (190) (198) (192) (193) (190) (190) (20) (4) (3) -11- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter October -December 2006 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8N 9N 10N American Eagle E140 814 Average 86.7 85.4 88.2 79.6 78.8 81.0 79.1 84.7 78.0 82.2 Count (742) (730) (740) (629) (496) (731) (66) (59} (1) (3) SkyWest CL60 176 Average 85.7 82.8 87.7 78.5 77.9 80.5 79.2 83.7 #N/A #N/A Count 159 155 157 66 20 154 10 15 0 0 CRJ7 180 Average 88.8 87.1 86.7 80.0 79.0 81.7 79.0 87.9 #N/A 75.8 Count (163 163) 167) 132 (87 155 121 13 0 2 E120 500 Average 81.8 82.0 82.1 78.3 81.6 78.6 79.8 82.8 81.4 83.4 Count (449} (446) (451) (74) (224) (419) (42) (33) (8) (1) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation October -December 2006 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site enera viation et verage Count .5 (3342) 7. (3244} (3243) (1952) (1431) .7 (2939) (1152) 7. (266) .5 (16) (35) -12- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Alaska Air AS B7374 4,343 4,850 7,961 7,130 7,188 B7377 7,196 7,089 4,286 4,439 4,657 B7378 128 2 Aloha AQ B7377 2,182 2,910 3,399 3,685 3,936 America West AW A319 631 2,883 1,201 2,364 3,659 A320 1,888 2,955 3,390 3,050 2,132 87373 7,931 3,184 2,559 2,746 2,271 B757 208 26 Z 755 1,091 American AA B7378 6,200 4,663 9,226 6,896 6,737 B757 7,670 7,612 691 1,996 2,673 MD80 2,606 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,981 Continental CO B7373 2 2 4 B7375 1, 744 1,640 1,303 1, 767 1,812 B7377 3,050 3,378 3,689 3,529 3,711 B7378 4 12 4 B757 4 Delta DL B7373 1,016 . 1,243 7 67378 397 878 87 131 280 B757 2,105 2,503 4,077 3,859 3,264 MD90 3,610 2,597 1,524 1,572 1,841 FedEx FM A300 10 26 20 4 96 A310 496 476 481 496 405 a300 2 a310 2 1 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 70 1,114 13 A319 10 379 1,022 1,034 2,139 B7373 214 1,046 2 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1,208 2,266 456 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 1.,325 Midwest YX B717 302 1,210 238 Northwest NW A319 854 2,790 2,814 2,793 2,073 A320 2,003 57 38 40 48 Southwest WN B7373 1,827 252 176 2 402 B7375 8,744 8,231 1,358 2 B7377 6,209 10,498 19,745 22,022 24,146 UPS 5X B757 452 448 472 476 480 US Airways US A319 1,456 895 A320 4 United UA A319 2,384 2,211 1,556 1,760 2,172 A320 2,183 2,403 3,173 2,086 1,399 B7373 70 10 9 2 72 B7375 103 8 8 B757 6,045 6,492 6,498 5,800 6,126 -13- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT nPF,RATTnNAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 A300 10 26 20 4 98 A310 496 476 481 498 406 A318 2 70 1,114 13 A31~9 5,335 9,158 6,593 7,951 10,043 A320 6,074 5,419 6,601 5,176 3,579 B717 302 1,210 238 B7373 9,830 3,660 4,808 3,995 2,756 B7374 4,343 4,850 7,961 7,130 7,188 B7375 10,591 9,879 2,661 1,769 1,820 B7377 18,637 23,875 31,119 33,675 36,450 B7378 6, 597 5, 545 9,313 7,167 7, 023 B757 16,480 17,085 11,740 12,886 13,634 CL60 1,208 2,266 456 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 1,325 MD80 2,606 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,981 MD90 3,610 2,597 1,524 1,572 1,841 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5, 000 0 2002 ^ 2003 ^ 2004 0 2005 ^ 2006 By Year -14- TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Alaska Air AS B7374 5.942 6.644 10.866 9.770 9.838 B7377 9.866 9.710 5.863 6.085 6.386 B7378 0.175 0.003 Aloha AQ B7377 2.986 3.984 4.645 5.058 5.386 America West AW A319 0.863 3.937 1.634 3.244 5.008 A320 2.578 4.047 4.634 4.178 2.934 B7373 10.877 4.373 3.495 3.762 3.110 B757 0.285 0.036 0.003 1.033 1.493 American AA 67378 8.493 6.386 12.609 9.452 9.227 B757 10.507 10.430 0.945 2.734 3.666 MD80 3.575 1.433 3.852 3.433 2.721 Continental CO B7373 0.003 0.003 0.003 B7375 2.386 2.247 1.781 2.436 2.490 B7377 4.178 4.627 5.038 4.819 5.082 B7378 0.005 0.016 0.005 B757 0.005 Delta DL B7373 1.385 1.704 0.011 B7378 0.542 1.200 0.120 0.181 0.384 B757 2.882 3.425 5.571 5.290 4.474 MD90 4.937 3.562 2.082 2.153 2.518 FedEx FM A300 0.014 0.036 0.027 0.005 0.132 A310 0.679 0.652 0.656 0.677 0.556 a300 0.003 a310 0.003 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 0.003 0.096 1.526 0.019 A319 0.014 0.518 1.393 1.416 2.929 B7373 0.293 1.432 0.003 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1.655 3.104 0.623 0.003 CRJ9 3.238 1.995 1.816 Midwest YX B717 0.414 1.650 0.326 Northwest NW A319 1.173 3.822 3.844 3.827 2.841 A320 2.742 0.079 0.052 0.055 0.066 Southwest WN B7373 2.512 0.345 0.240 0.003 0.551 B7375 11.981 11.279 1.855 0.003 B7377 8.493 14.378 26.975 30.173 33.088 UPS 5X B757 0.619 0.614 0.645 0.652 0.658 U S Ai rways U S A319 1..997 1.227 A320 0.005 United UA A319 3.277 3.038 2.126 2.416 2.984 A320 2.978 3.279 4.331 2.852 1.912 B7373 0.096 0.014 0.011 0.003 0.099 B7375 0.140 0.011 0.011 B757 8.288 8.896 8.891 7.945 8.395 -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: December 21, 2006 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Airport Statistics Silvia Zavala presented the statistics from the JWA Airport Statistics Report for November 2006, and copies were distributed to attendees. 2. Additional topic discussions and/or comments and questions Greg Carroll asked for an explanation of the drop in tower operations. Eric Freed replied that it was largely due to a decrease in general aviation operations. Additionally, American Eagle contributed to the reduction in air taxi operations. Greg Carroll asked if transit passengers get counted toward the JWA Million Annual Passengers (MAP) limit. Bonnie Frisch replied that if those passengers stay at JWA for less than three hours, then they are not counted toward the MAP limit. Tim Stoaks asked, for an explanationof the JWA Access and Noise Office charter. Eric Freed replied that the responsibilities are: -Access Plan enforcement -MAP enforcement (passenger limits) -Number and type of departure flights -Noise limits Tim Stoaks asked about the redevelopment plan. Eric Freed explained that the JWA Access and Noise Office does not manage that program, and that the airport is trying to close the program. Tim Stoaks was not satisfied with the response and requested a formal follow-up response. Nancy Alston expressed her concern about what she believed to bean increasing number of planes taking off after 10 PM. She requested a matrix showing which carriers are asking for extensions, and expressed her belief that it was happening a lot more than last year. Nancy Alston (for a member of her group) asked about a loud flight at 4:20 PM every day. Eric Freed expressed that it was probably an MD80 which is the loudest commercial aircraft type operated at John Wayne Airport. Tim Stoaks stated that their (SAH PAC) issue is corporate jets. Eric Freed replied that the -16- restriction we have on corporate jets is "three strikes and you're out". Tim Stoaks asked if there is a way to make it "two strikes and you're out". Eric Freed explained that it would violate the Aircraft Noise & Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA). David Chan added that ANCA prevents airports across the U.S. from issuing more restrictive noise regulations. Reducing three strikes to two strikes would be considered more restrictive. Greg Carroll asked about the quarterly average for carrier noise levels. Eric Freed explained that logarithmic average means that one loud event takes many quiet events to offset. Irma Ortega added that John Wayne Airport has previously disqualified commercial aircraft, such as Southwest's B737-300, for exceeding the quarterly average noise limits, and that the airport and the air carriers do take the noise regulations seriously. Greg Carroll, referring to a particular apartment complex in Santa Ana Heights, stated that he doesn't want this apartment complex to receive noise attenuation (the landlord had previously refused insulation, however, Greg Carroll has recently heard that the county may go ahead with the sound insulation). Charles Griffin suggested that rather than having an hour of loud air traffic (between 7-8 AM7 in Newport Beach, the aircraft could take-off to the north. Mr. Griffin stated that it would save money on fuel for the air carriers and help reduce aircraft noise in Newport Beach. Nancy Alston asked why some planes cutback and some don't, then added that she was sick of pilots making fun of the steep departure in their pre-flight announcements. Eric Freed replied that every carrier has their own procedure. Charles Griffin gave a history of the cutback procedures at John Wayne Airport. Nancy Alston stated that she sees carriers that do not follow the noise cutback procedure. Tim Stoaks agreed with Nancy Alston. Eric Freed explained that the requirement is for carriers to stay below the quarterly noise limits, and that it is unlikely that any. Class A flights can stay below those limits without using the cutback procedure. Nancy Alston asked Mr. Freed how long it would be until Stage 4 was implemented. Eric Freed responded that Stage 4 implementation is still being debated. Charles Griffin discussed the issue of CO2 pollution. Nancy Alston stated that Europe is planning to eliminate planes that pollute above its environmental limitations. She also stated that AirFair is looking at noise and environmental pollution. -17- NAC ROSTER N- Eric Freed Bonnie Frisch Irma Ortega Silvia Zavala David Chan Greg Carroll Tim Stoaks Ian Woolley Nancy Alston Charles Griffin Brad Ayres December 21, 2006 ORGANIZATION John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport SAH ProjectlOCDA-Vice Chair PAC SAH Projectl~CDA-PAC Southwest Airlines JWA AIR FAIR-East Bluff resident JWA AIR FAIR-East Bluff resident Resident -18-