Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05 JWA NOISE ABATEMENT REPORT 10-16-07Agenda Item ~_ /~ p j~ T Reviewed: ~%{~- ~; rl~~l r ~1Z ~1 Olt 1 City Manager " Finance Director NIA .: . MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2007 TO: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This report transmits two John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for the first and second quarters of 2007. The average noise level measured at monitoring station NMS 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, remained relatively the same during the first and second quarters. Average noise levels during both quarters remained below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT No Fiscal Impact DISCUSSION Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their webpage. Attachment 1 contains the quarterly reports for the first and second quarters of 2007. A brief overview of the information contained within the attachment is as follows: Measured Noise Levels • During the first quarter of 2007, the average CNEL at Remote Monitoring Station (NMS) 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School was 56.7 dB. This is 0.4 dB lower than the previous four quarters. For comparison, the CNEL was 0.3 dB higher (57.0) during the first quarter of 2006. City Council Report John Waye Airport Noise Abatement October 16, 2007 Page 2 • During the second quarter of 2007, the average CNEL was 57.6 dB. This is 0.6 dB higher than the previous four quarters. For comparison, the CNEL was measured at the same level (57.6) during the second quarter of 2006. • All measured noise levels are below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL for residential areas. Noise Complaints • During the first quarter of 2007, there were eight (8) Tustin area complaints compared with one (1) complaint for the same period during 2006. • During the second quarter of 2006, there were eight (8) Tustin area complaints compared with twenty-three (23) complaints for the same period during 2006. • The number of complaints increased during the first quarter and decreased significantly during the second quarter compared to the same periods in 2006. Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. Reina Kapadia Assistant Planner Attachments: Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2007 and April 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007. S:\Cdd\CCREPORT\JWA report to council 10-16-07.doc ATTACHMENTS John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2007 and April 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007 NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2007 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 137th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-1 S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-SS: 324'/2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-8N:17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-lON:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (April 1, 2006 -March 31, 2007). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". Fi ure 1 JOHN WAYN E AIRPORT NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS~ LOCATION MAP / A GAR N G 0 ~ m ~ 0 5 fgIRHAVE Av AV t a ~ ~ w "~ L.l p TRASK ~ qV .. z a Z 0 THI L P C SANTA r pR Av DO GE qv 17TH ~ Gi ~ TH ST ~ ~ ` ~ - MASHINGiON q~/' 9 _ ~ ~' Y F y < HA2AR0 q ~ Iv CENTER OR T ~ CO ~ q tP ~ r 1~N ~/~ ~~. SANTA r ANA 5TH T P T ~ I T ST T ~ ~ z ti CHESTNUT AV MAIN /Rl. .a ti ~ ~ v o r A T A A nD ~ ', ~ MCFAOGEN < ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~t .r ~` n F rv p AV R ~ • 9N EOIN R A - , 0 R AV r Y ~ 1 x ~ AV WARNER ~ WMNEfl AI ~> ., SEGERSTRGn OH OY R ' W'r ~ D A r..~.r ' ~ ~ 9O E AW ~ M m a n A ii ' NACARTHUR y BLVD Z `~ I r~ l !~ . 5 N ~ r +~ Csy • `~~ D , ~ a 8N 9 ~ - GIS R AV // KoTN ~ ~!, /~~ yi/ ~ C~' T BAKER 57 ti ~ O TT a e W r . / ~ Av _ , 3~ A „ - ~ i ~ ~ f~ 4 , . 4 /i a ARL1N TON OR 4' P p i7 tim (' P~4 ~ Y f I Fpl , ~ ~ 1C ~ i n ~ n 0,0 ~ ~vq •Y •' r a rX ~ ii ~_MILSGN 57 ~ ~~ . V RS TY ` vSTaR T ~ ~~ • ' ~~' ~ ~„ n ~~ ,4S ~ T~q,<~ - ,, ', , y /~ ; 2 " C I ~V 11i/`J @P / P 9fti O ~4N • ~ ~./ 1 M I7iH T PPN/ 9 ~ a ~ q1!' ~ R a~ ~ d 1 • ~~ I ` ' ~ } ``• ~~s T ., ~ '~~ ~ B . o •. ___ ~~ ~' ~. ,.__ ~,,, ~ ~ r °•~ . ~~ , a . .. ~~ °. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ • • J ~, .` y N '•~.: 0 1 2 3 4 5 Scale In miles JWAdivisionProject/GovtPxCommRelation/Cbnomost.dgn -2- Figure 2 -3- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS .lanuarv -March 2007 Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Average Daily Jet Pro O erations 2 Jet O erations Janua 8,424 343 2,862 27,151 364 Februa 7,621 302 2,862 26,307 374 March 8,604 334 3,032 29,733 375 First Quarter 24,649 979 8,756 83,191 371 Twelve Months 04/01 /06 - 03/31 /07 100,539 4,033 35,897 347,321 374 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) January -March 2007 Jet Carrier Military Prop Carrier II GA Jet I~~ GA Other 24,649 27 979 8,756 48,780 li 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending March 31, 2007, 75 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this is the same number of dwelling units in 6i2sro~ _4_ the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending March 31, 2007. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the "Noise Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program, approximately 77 general agriculture (A-1) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAIP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym "SAH AIP".) During the 1st quarter of 2007, no additional residences have been made compatible through the County's SAH AIP. A total of 486 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AIP. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (January 1, 2007 -March 31, 2007) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2007, the Office received 178 complaints from citizens. This is a 18.7% decrease from the 219 complaints received last quarter. It is a 31.9% increase from the 135 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 19 20 15 10 11 10 11 11 6 6 $ 3 2 3 4 ~5~a~a .`~SJa ~\~ac ~oy~ ~\o'r~5 y~`J~ ~oaGr OoaGr Foio~~ ~Jy~`~ OoaGr pro` ~aP~a ~\~'r~5 ,~J~~~ ~y~G\~ Oa o~ ono G o~ ;~~~°~ a°~ ~ ~~ aP Oa~o G G ~~~ ~• ~ 5a~~ Community -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 4/06 through 3/07 Values in d6 at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Apr 2006 67.7 66.3 65.8 59.2 58.5 60.0 57.0 68.9 45.2 57.8 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 22 30 30 30 May 2006 67.5 66.1 65.4 58.7 58.0 59.6 55.9 68.9 45.1 57.8 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 29 31 Jun 2006 67.9 66.4 65.9 58.7 58.3 60.0 56.2 69.3 46.1 57.2 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Q-2 2006 67.7 66.3 65.7 58.9 58.3 59.9 56.4 69.0 45.5 57.6 # Days 91 91 91 91 91 91 82 91 89 91 Ju12006 67.9 66.1 65.7 58.2 57.6 59.4 56.3 68.9 43.1 56.6 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Aug 2006 68.2 66.5 66.1 58.7 58.0 59.9 55.8 69.3 44.1 57.3 # Da s 31 31 31 31 25 31 31 31 31 31 Sep 2006 67.8 66.0 65.4 58.1 57.2 59.1 55.1 68.7 45.0 56.7 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Q-3 2006 68.0 66.2 65.8 58.4 57.6 59.5 55.8 69.0 44.1 56.9 # Days 92 92 92 92 86 92 92 92 91 92 Oct 2006 67.6 65.8 65.4 58.5 57.7 59.5 55.9 68.7 46.4 57.2 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Nov 2006 67.6 66.1 65.6 58.3 57.6 59.7 55.7 68.8 46.5 57.2 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 Dec 2006 66.7 .65.2 65.2 57.4 56.7 59.5 54.9 68.1 46.4 55.9 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Q-4 2006 67.3 65.7 65.4 58.1 57.4 59.6 55.5 68.6 46.4 56.8 # Days 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 91 92 Jan 2007 65.5 64.0 65.5 57.0 55.8 60.4 53.9 67.5 45.3 55.4 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 22 31 31 31 Feb 2007 67.5 66.1 65.4 58.7 58.1 59.7 56.3 68.9 45.1 57.5 # Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 23 28 27 28 Mar 2007 67.2 65.9 66.1 58.1 57.6 60.4 55.4 68.6 46.9 57.0 # Da s 31 31 31 27 31 31 31 31 27 31 Q-12007 66.8 65.4 65.7 58.0 57.2 60.2 55.3 68.4 45.8 56.7 # Da s 90 90 90 86 90 90 76 90 85 90 Q-2 2006 t hru Q-1 2007 Total 67.5 65.9 65.6 58.3 57.6 59.8 55.8 68.7 45.5 57.0 # Days 365 365 365 361 359 365 342 365 356 365 Q-1 2006 t hru Q-4 2006 (P revious 4 Quart ers) Total 67.5 66.0 65.6 58.4 57.7 59.7 55.9 68.7 45.8 57.1 # Days 365 365 365 363 359 365 351 365 361 363 Change from Previous 4 Quarters -0.1 -0.1 0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.1 -0.1 0.0 -0.3 -0.1 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION January 2007 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.4 65.7 68.3 57.8 58.2 63.9 56.0 65.7 43.5 52.1 2 65.6 64.0 64.4 56.3 55.6 59.0 53.4 68.9 45.1 54.9 3 67.5 65.7 65.2 58.8 57.0 58.6 54.5 69.6 44.2 58.2 4 67.7 66.0 65.0 59.3 58.3 59.2 55.6 70.2 34.7 60.1 5 59.5 58.4 68.1 45.7 46.1 63.6 39.2 62.8 47.0 51.1 6 60.9 59.9 60.7 51.5 50.2 55.3 46.1 65.7 46.4 51.1 7 63.7 61.4 68.5 52.9 54.1 64.1 50.3 63.8 41.6 46.4 8 57.0 55.1 66.1 40.4 42.0 61.2 28.3 61.8 45.9 40.4 9 65.3 63.7 62.9 56.2 54.5 56.7 52.1 67.6 46.8 54.5 10 66.8 65.1 64.8 58.8 56.1 59.2 54.0 68.9 45.4 56.9 11 67.1 65.7 65.1 59.7 58.5 59.7 57.1 69.9 45.7 59.5 12 66.0 64.6 65.4 56.6 56.7 59.8 54.5 66.8 47.9 53.7 13 53.0 50.2 63.8 32.5 40.0 59.3 #N/A 60.7 44.1 43.4 14 66.0 64.1 66.2 57.0 55.8 61.2 54.1 64.8 41.6 50.7 15 57.9 55.9 67.2 47.6 41.5 62.6 47.3 61.5 42.5 42.6 16 63.9 62.7 62.7 55.9 54.1 56.9 50.2 67.2 46.4 52.8 17 66.1 65.0 64.2 59.2 57.2 59.3 56.0 68.3 47.6 55.7 18 59.7 58.4 67.3 49.9 49.2 62.8 #N/A 62.2 46.1 47.3 19 66.4 65.0 64.6 58.1 57.0 59.2 #N/A 69.2 45.3 56.9 20 65.4 63.7 63.1 57.8 55.6 57.8 #N/A 65.9 39.3 54.4 21 58.6 56.4 67.6 41.4 47.6 63.4 #N/A 63.3 44.6 51.6 22 61.9 60.9 63.9 52.4 51.7 58.8 #N/A 66.9 45.9 52.5 23 65.0 63.9 63.8 55.3 54.4 57.6 #N/A 68.2 48.4 54.2 24 66.4 65.1 64.3 56.9 55.8 57.5 53.0 67.8 46.4 53.5 25 66.9 65.4 65.1 57.7 56.5 58.0 54.8 67.9 46.5 54.1 26 67.6 66.0 65.4 59.5 57.8 59.8 55.7 69.8 40.3 58.9 27 65.5 63.7 63.6 58.2 56.0 58.7 55.0 66.8 37.7 56.0 28 67.9 66.4 65.8 59.4 58.4 60.3 56.4 69.5 49.7 56.9 29 67.3 66.0 65.4 58.7 57.9 59.5 55.8 69.1 42.3 58.5 30 67.9 66.5 65.4 59.8 58.5 59.9 #N/A 69.2 46.0 58.3 31 67.7 66.0 65.7 59.9 58.8 60.4 #N/A 68.9 38.4 58.5 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 22 31 31 31 En.Av 65.5 64.0 65.5 57.0 55.8 60.4 53.9 67.5 45.3 55.4 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION February 2007 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 68.2 66.5 66.5 60.0 58.8 60.7 #N/A .68.8 47.4 57.9 2 68.5 67.0 66.6 59.7 59.0 60.5 #N/A 68.8 49.0 57.2 3 65.8 64.4 62.9 56.4 55.2 56.8 #N/A 65.7 41.4 51.1 4 66.5 65.0 63.9 56.1 54.8 56.8 #N/A 67.8 46.4 51.7 5 66.1 64.9 64.1 56.5 55.3 57.2 #N/A 68.3 41.7 54.4 6 66.7 65.2 64.2 57.5 56.3 58.0 53.2 66.5 46.5 55.6 7 67.7 66.3 65.6 58.1 57.2 59.0 54.5 69.1 33.7 58.9 8 68.4 66.6 66.5 59.7 58.5 60.2 55.5 69.1 44.0 57.2 9 68.3 67.0 65.8 59.1 58.7 60.2 56.0 69.3 41.3 58.0 10 65.7 64.4 63.8 57.0 56.4 57.3 53.1 66.9 #N/A 56.6 11 67.9 66.3 65.9 59.1 59.4 60.1 56.7 69.7 42.8 59.0 12 67.4 66.0 65.1 59.2 58.9 59.9 57.2 69.9 47.2 59.2 13 67.9 66.8 66.8 59.3 60.2 61.5 58.9 68.8 47.3 57.0 14 67.4 66.2 65.4 58.9 58.5 59.9 56.8 69.1 40.9 57.2 15 68.9 67.4 66.9 59.7 59.2 60.9 57.0 69.3 43.3 57.0 16 69.0 67.3 66.5 59.2 58.7 60.5 56.9 68.9 47.8 54.8 17 61.5 60.2 62.3 53.2 52.0 57.8 52.1 65.9 49.4 50.9 18 67.0 65.2 64.5 59.2 57.7 58.9 55.4 69.7 40.0 58.7 19 68.6 66.9 66.0 60.0 58.8 60.6 57.8 69.6 41.8 58.2 20 68.1 66.7 65.7 59.6 58.4 60.3 56.6 68.7 45.0 57.7 21 68.0 66.7 65.6 60.0 58.9 60.3 56.8 70.1 37.7 59.3 22 68.4 67.1 66.1 59.9 59.3 60.6 57.4 70.7 44.3 60.0 23 67.3 66.5 65.5 58.5 58.3 60.1 56.5 68.6 46.9 56.5 24 64.8 63.4 63.1 55.8 54.8 57.8 52.5 66.3 45.0 53.5 25 67.1 66.1 65.6 58.9 58.7 60.0 56.7 70.4 36.3 59.7 26 68.3 66.6 66.0 59.7 58.9 60.3 57.0 70.1 43.1 59.9 27 66.8 66.1 65.0 58.7 58.6 59.8 56.4 69.3 45.6 58.0 28 67.0 66.1 65.2 58.4 58.2 59.2 55.9 68.6 46.5 56.6 Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 23 28 27 28 En.Av 67.5 66.1 65.4 58.7 58.1 59.7 56.3 68.9 45.1 57.5 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION March 2007 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.6 66.2 65.1 58.7 57.9 59.4 56.1 68.8 45.4 56.7 2 65.7 64.4 64.5 56.1 55.7 60.3 52.9 67.8 51.5 53.5 3 59.2 58.0 61.3 50.9 49.6 57.0 47.0 66.0 .46.8 50.6 4 66.1 64.7 63.9 .55.9 54.9 56.9 53.4 67.6 43.9 53.3 5 66.1 64.9 63.3 56.1 54.2 56.4 51.7 67.4 43.6 54.4 6 66.4 65.1 63.9 56.8 56.6 57.7 54.3 67.5 43.1 55.2 7 67.1 65.8 65.0 58.5 57.4 58.8 54.5 69.0 46.5 57.5 8 69.0 68.1 73.4 61.0 61.3 67.8 58.8 69.8 42.1 58.5 9 68.3 67.2 66.1 59.1 58.5 60.2 55.9 69.7 45.1 59.0 10 66.1 64.8 63.8 56.8 56.2 58.1 54.5 66.7 49.1 54.1 11 68.0 66.5 66.3 56.9 56.7 59.7 55.3 68.1 41.9 52.4 12 65.1 64.2 63.6 54.4 53.9 57.5 50.6 68.2 46.7 54.3 13 66.1 64.4 64.2 57.0 55.8 58.5 53.9 69.0 47.4 56.7 14 68.0 66.7 66.2 59.7 58.4 60.5 55.7 69.8 32.3 58.7 15 68.6 67.2 66.6 59.6 58.7 60.4 56.7 69.3 28.4 57.9 16 67.7 66.5 66.2 58.2 58.2 59.5 55.9 69.7 42.8 58.7 17 65.5 64.2 63.3 55.7 54.7 57.4 52.1 67.2 #N/A 55.7 18 67.9 66.4 65.9 59.3 58.5 59.9 55.3 69.7 #N/A 59.6 19 68.5 66.9 66.5 60.0 59.5 61.1 57.8 69.5 #N/A 58.8 20 68.0 66.5 65.8 59.4 58.3 59.9 55.2 68.9 40.4 59.3 21 67.4 66.6 65.7 59.4 58.6 60.0 56.8 69.2 44.9 58.1 22 68.0 66.5 66.5 58.9 58.3 60.8 56.9 69.5 42.0 56.9 23 69.2 67.5 66.8 #N/A 59.5 61.0 57.4 69.8 37.7 58.5 24 66.7 65.5 64.8 #N/A 57.5 59.3 55.2 67.8 46.9 56.0 25 68.4 67.2 66.6 #N/A 59.4 61.0 57.5 69.1 #N/A 58.3 26 67.9 66.1 65.7 #N/A 58.2 60.0 55.7 69.6 36.9 59.3 27 65.5 64.3 68.0 56.6 57.4 63.5 55.3 65.0 37.4 52.1 28 66.1 65.1 64.9 57.6 56.7 59.8 55.3 69.3 43.3 57.7 29 67.7 66.4 65.9 59.4 58.0 60.0 56.5 68.5 44.8 56.0 30 66.9 65.5 65.2 57.6 56.9 58.9 54.5 68.9 56.7 56.5 31 67.1 65.6 64.9 57.4 55.9 57.2 52.7 66.9 48.2 53.6 Da s 31 31 31 27 31 31 31 31 27 31 En.Av 67.2 65.9 66.1 58.1 57.6 60.4 55.4 68.6 46.9 57.0 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A January -March 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 4 as a it 74 5 verage 4. 5. .4 4.4 Count (502) (497) (503) (489) (511) (500) (452) (75) (42) (50) B7377 388 Average 92.1 91.0 88.4 81.4 83.0 83.3 81.0 89.1 84.1 79.6 Count (328) (329) (326) (318) (330) (328) (292) (51) (4) (14) B7378 60 Average 94.2 92.6 90.3 83.4 84.5 85.1 82.5 89.9 77.4 79.9 Count (54) (56) (56) (55) (56) (56) (49) (4} (1) (1) Aloha 67377 500 Average 94.8 92.8 90.9 84.8 84.2 86.1 83.8 91.6 79.2 79.5 Count (404) (387) (403) (392) (394) (398) (310) (87) (15) (25) America West A320 693 Average 92.1 91.1 90.5 85.4 84.0 85.0 81.4 86.3 77.3 80.2 Count (595) (587) (596) (569) (593) (588) (466) (92) (2) (15) B7373 127 Average 95.6 93.8 91.8 85.9 84.9 86.9 83.6 91.9 80.2 82.7 Count (93) (96) (97) (94) (97) (94) (90) (26) (11) (16) B757 167 Average 94.5 94.1 90.8 84.9 83.7 84.6 81.4 89.2 79.2 78.5 Count (127) (127) (132) (126) (127) (127) (91) (27) (5) (5) American B7378 823 Average 98.5 96.3 95.7 88.5 87.0 88.7 84.6 91.2 79.8 80.6 Count (694) (693) (692) (675) (704) (683) (617) (111) (30) (51) 6757 309 Average 95.0 93.7 92.0 86.1 85.6 87.4 84.1 89.6 78.5 81.7 Count (246) (239) (242) (240) (248) (241) (222) (49) (6) (13) MD80 416 Average 99.2 98.2 97.8 91.2 91.1 92.8 89.6 97.5 84.6 85.1 Count (345) (336) (345) (341) (350) (347) (308) (51) (40) (36) Continental B7373 25 Average 96.6 93.7 93.6 87.9 86.3 88.1 84.6 92.5 79.6 80.8 Count (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (10) (10) (13) (6) (6) B7377 593 Average 95.7 93.9 92.7 85.7 84.5 86.2 83.1 92.2 79.8 79.1 Count (489) (479) (491) (479) (498) (488) (439) (84) (31) (31) Delta 87378 7 Average 92.2 91.0 89.9 85.3 84.2 86.2 81.9 88.3 #N/A #N/A Count (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (5) (1) (0) (0) B757 400 Average 95.9 94.1 93.6 87.2 86.1 86.9 83.7 89.5 79.9 78.5 Count (321) (320) (325) (316) (327) (316) (287) (58) (9) (24) MD90 254 Average 91.2 90.1 89.8 82.7 82.9 84.6 81.9 89.6 79.2 78.0 Count (214) (214) (214) (194) (199) (207) (175) (38) (2) (12) FedEx A300 43 Average 98.2 96.7 94.9 88.2 88.9 89.5 86.0 92.3 #N/A #N/A Count (39) (39) (39) (38) (39) (39) (34) (4) {0) (0) A310 21 Average 98.0 97.0 94.7 88.2 89.5 89.4 87.1 88.7 #N/A #N/A Count (20) (19) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (1) (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A318 3 Average 92.7 91.0 90.6 85.6 83.4 84.4 79.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) 3) (3) (0) (0) (0 A319 263 Average 92.7 91.1 91.3 85.9 84.7 85.4 81.4 87.5 79.1 80.5 Count (210) (215) (216) (211) (217) (209) (167) (40) (5) (16) Mesa Airlines CRJ9 165 Average 92.2 90.8 92.7 84.6 83.2 86.0 79.9 87.3 #N/A #N/A Count (149) (149) (149) (145) (149) (148) (98) (15) (0) (0) Northwest A320 254 Average 95.5 93.4 93.1 86.6 85.3 86.1 82.4 89.7 79.8 78.8 Count (202) (208) (209) (205) (210) (205) (178) (35) (2) (11) Southwest 87373 9 Average 93.9 91.8 89.4 84.1 82.6 84.3 80.6 89.2 #N/A #N/A Count (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (3) (0) (0) B7377 437 Average 91.2 90.1 86.8 81.5 80.9 81.8 79.4 90.2 79.8 79.3 Count (372) (375) (374) (354) (353) (374) (254) (59) (7) (12) United A320 560 Average 91.3 90.3 90.4 84.9 83.5 85.1 82.9 86.9 78.6 79.2 Count (480) (472) (482) (468) (485) (474) (425) 67) (9) (10) B757 481 Average 92.9 91.3 90.1 83.6 83.4 85.0 82.5 89.6 79.1 78.6 Count (382) (380) (387) (372) (381) (382) (338) (84) (10) (26) UPS 6757 63 Average 95.8 94.8 92.8 85.8 84.7 85.9 81.5 86.5 #N/A 77.8 Count (58) (58) (58) (57) (57) (58) (50) (5} {0) (1) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E January -March 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Si te 4 as a it 7 77 verage 7. Count (339) (340) (338) (319) (339) (337) (277) (40) (4) (8) America West A320 103 Average 89.7 89.4 88.8 84.3 82.5 83.1 79.7 85.7 #N/A 76.1 Count (94) (94) (94) (93) (90) (93) (46) (9) (0) (2) Southwest B7377 2979 Average 90.5 89.6 86.1 81.3 80.6 81.6 79.2 89.1 79.2 78.6 Count (2562) (2556) (2554) (2410) (2388) (2528) (1781) (373) (38) (70) United 6757 179 Average 90.4 89.5 87.7 82.2 81.5 82.9 81.4 87.5 76.4 79.1 Count (150) (148) (150) (145) (134) (142) (130) (25) (1) (4) -11- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter January -March 2007 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 4 5 mencan age 4 verage 7 4. .4 Count (576) (575) (575) (462) (354) (567) (31) (91) (1) (0) SkyWest CL60 178 Average 85.9 83.1 87.9 79.2 78.3 80.8 80.0 82.6 #N/A 79.1 Count (153) (150) (150) (64) (28) (151) 10) 23) (0) (1) CRJ7 164 Average 87.8 86.6 86.6 80.6 79.6 81.6 79.1 86.4 #N/A 78.3 Count (136) (134) (138) (112) (.63) (133) (61) (25) (0) (3) E120 491 Average 82.0 82.2 82.3 78.7 81.6 79.6 79.2 81.9 83.9 77.6 Count (422) (416) (414) (82) (202) (395) (24) (60) (3) (3) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation January -March 2007 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site enera viation et verage Count (3164) (3113) (3051) (1823) (1424) (2716) (930) (412) (23) (45) -12- TABLE 9 A1R CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Alaska Air AS B7374 4,850 7,961 7,130 7,188 1,187 87377 7,089 4,286 4,439 4,657 1,541 B7378 128 2 120 Aloha A B7377 0 3,399 5 3,93 9 America West AW A319 2,883 1,201 2,364 3,659 968 A320 2,955 3,390 3,050 2,132 626 B7373 3,184 2,559 2,746 2,271 252 8757 26 2 755 1,091 333 American AA B7378 4,663 9,226 6,896 6,737 1,651 B757 7,612 691 1,996 2,673 625 MD80 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,981 835 Continental CO 87373 2 4 B7375 1,640 1,303 1,767 1,812 51 B7377 3,378 3,689 3,529 3,711 1,185 87378 4 12 4 8757 4 Delta DL B7373 1,016 1,243 7 B7378 878 87 131 280 14 6757 2,503 4,077 3,859 3,264 795 MD90 2,597 1,524 1,572 1,841 507 FedEx FM A300 26 20 4 96 86 A310 476 481 496 405 42 a300 2 a310 2 1 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 70 1,114 13 6 A319 379 1, 022 1, 034 2,139 526 B7373 214 1,046 2 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 2,266 456 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 1,325 330 i west Y 717 2 1, 10 238 Northwest NW A319 2,790 2,814 2,793 2,073 506 A320 57 38 40 48 2 Southwest WN B7373 252 176 2 402 18 67375 8,231 1,358 2 67377 10,498 .19,745 22,022 24,146 6,835 UP 5X 6757 448 472 476 480 126 US Airways US A319 895 A320 4 United UA A319 2,211 1,556 1,760 2,172 902 A320 .2,403 3,173 2,086 1,399 217 87373 10 9 2 72 87375 8 8 8757 6,492 6,498 5,800 6,126 1,317 -13- TABLE IO AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 A300 26 20 4 98 86 A310 476 481 498 406 42 A318 2 70 1,114 13 6 A319 9,158 6, 593 7, 951 10, 043 2, 902 A320 5,419 6,601 5,176 3,579 845 8717 302 1,210 238 B7373 3,660 4,808 3,995 2,756 270 B7374 4,850 7,961 7,130 7,188 1,187 67375 9,879 2,661 1,769 1,820 51 B7377 23,875 31,119 33,675 36,450 10,560 B7378 5,545 9,313 7,167 7,023 1,785 6757 17,085 11,740 12,886 13,634 3,196 CL60 2,266 456 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 1,325 330 MD80 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,981 835 MD90 2,597 1,524 1,572 1,841 507 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY ', 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 oo ,~o ,~~ ~o ~o ,~~ ~~ ~~` ,~~ 1~ 1w h~ 60 ~o 00 00 ', By Year ^ 2003 I ', ^ 2004 ^ 2005 ^ 2006 I I! ^ 2007 i --_ -14- TABLE 11 A TR C' A R R iF.R A VF.R AC'~F, DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Alaska Air AS B7374 6.644 10.866 9.770 9.838 6.611 67377 9.710 5.863 6.085 6.386 8.556 67378 0.175 0.003 0.667 Alo a A 7377 3. 4 4. 45 5. 58 5.38 5.55 America West AW A319 3.937. 1.634 3.244 5.008 5.378 A320 4.047 4.634 4.178 2.934 3.467 87373 4.373 3.495 3.762 3.110 1.411 B757 0.036 0.003 1.033 1.493 1.856 American AA B7378 6.386 12.609 9.452 9.227 9.167 B757 10.430 0.945 2.734 3.666 3.467 MD80 1.433 3.852 3.433 2.721 4.633 Continental CO B7373 0.003 0.003 67375 2.247 1.781 2.436 2.490 0.278 67377 4.627 5.038 4.819 5.082 6.589 B7378 0.005 0.016 0.005 B757 0.005 Delta DL 67373 1.385 1.704 0.011 B7378 1.200 0.120 0.181 0.384 0.078 8757 3.425 5.571 5.290 4.474 4.444 MD90 3.562 2.082 2.153 2.518 2.822 FedEx FM A300 0.036 0.027 0.005 0.132 0.478 A310 0.652 0.656 0.677 0.556 0.233 a300 0.003 a310 0.003 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 0.003 0.096 1.526 0.019 0.033 A319 0.518 1.393 1.416 2.929 2.922 B7373 0.293 1.432 0.003 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 3.104 0.623 0.003 CRJ9 3.238 1.995 1.816 1.833 Midwest 6717 0.414 1. 5 0.3 Northwest NW A319 3.822 3.844 3.827 2.841 2.811 A320 0.079 0.052 0.055 0.066 0.011 Southwest WN B7373 0.345 0.240 0.003 0.551 0.100 67375 11.279 1.855 0.003 B7377 14.378 26.975 30.173 33.088 37.967 5 B757 14 .645 0.652 5 .7 US Airways US A319 1.227 A320 0.005 United UA A319 3.038 2.126 2.416 2.984 5.000 A320 3.279 4.331 2.852 1.912 1.222 B7373 0.014 0.011 0.003 0.099 B7375 0.011 0.011 6757 8.896 8.891 7.945 8.395 7.333 -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: March 14, 2007 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Airport Statistics Jim Sugden presented the statistics from the JWA Airport Statistics Report for February 2007, and copies were distributed to attendees. 2. Additional topic discussions and/or comments and questions Greg Carroll asked, does JWA ever have connecting flights? Eric Freed replied that JWA does have connecting flights, but it is a very small percentage of the total flights, less than 1 %. Greg Carroll asked, does the airport ever survey to find out about where passengers live and their destinations? Eric Freed replied that passenger surveys are done every other year, by telephone survey, and intercept in terminal. Greg Carroll asked, where is the survey information posted/published? And how extensive is the information? Eric Freed answered, that he would get back to Mr. Carroll on how/where passenger survey results are distributed. Greg Carroll asked, could carriers provide information on where passengers live and their destinations? Eric Freed replied, it might be difficult to get that information from the carriers. Nancy Alston asked, how will the expansion of the commercial terminal effect general aviation tie down/parking and operations? Eric Freed replied, that some general aviation aircraft will get moved around, but tie down/parking is expected to stay the same. Greg Carroll asked, will runway 19L be shut down soon? Eric Freed replied that the night time operational restriction for runway 19L is already in effect as of February 27, 2007 from 7:30 PM to 9:00 AM for take-offs and landings, seven days a week, through 2010. Greg Carroll asked, will the general aviation community at JWA ever be pushed to other airports? Eric Freed replied that while it is hard to project what might happen in the distant future, currently and historically, general aviation has had a strong presence at JWA, and is -16- supported by the Board. Nancy Alston stated that she heard Alan Murphy speak, and that he mentioned the terminal expansion project will create more RON spaces. Ms. Alston asked, how will the additional RON spaces effect morning operations? Eric Freed replied that the commercial carrier Remain-Over- Night positions will remain at 30. Melinda Seeley asked, who is responsible for "the slope" along Bristol (southern airport border). Eric Freed replied that historically it was owned by Caltrans, and only recently did the County obtain ownership. Improvement of "the slope" is expected to occur concurrently with the right turn lane project at the southeast corner of the airfield (Campus Drive and Bristol Street). Kris Riau stated that for the last two years she has lived in the North Tustin community of Cowan Heights near Newport & 17th, and in that time she has witnessed considerable variation in the flight paths of aircraft arriving at JWA. Ms Riau asked "who decides which planes from which angles"? and "Is there a way to distribute, so not all aircraft fly over her area? Eric Freed replied that the FAA and Pilot are in control of the aircraft course, and that many factors contribute to the variation in arrival tracks including: FAA's sequencing of traffic, amount of traffic, direction of arrival, weather/visibility, ILS or visual approach, etc. Charles Griffin stated, "it's a free country", anything over 1000' pilots can go where they want. The airport only monitors the noise. Kris Riau stated, noise and path is the same. Nancy Alston stated that it is the culture in the aviation community that the pilot has the last word. Kris Riau asked is there anything we can do as a residents? Eric Freed replied that the only one who can answer that is the FAA. Cherie Weber asked, when El Toro vacated, did it effect approaches? Eric Freed replied, yes. Airspace that at one time had restrictions is now open. Kris Riau asked, when ascending, are planes forced to go up a certain way for noise? Eric Freed replied, yes. High performance aircraft follow standard instrument departure procedures. Cherie Weber stated that departing flights are going over the high school (east of back bay), and stated that she has seen the departure procedure deteriorate. Nancy Alston stated that the local airport has a lot of control over noise procedures. Nancy Alston stated that at the last NAC meeting, she asked if the airport could post curfew exemptions, and they were posted on the website almost immediately thereafter, thanks to Eric Freed. -17- Nancy Alston stated that on a recent flight, she experienced a pilot making fun of the JWA departure procedure, and compared that with a recent Southwest flight on which she had a better experience. Tim Stoaks thanked Eric Freed for his email re: redevelopment. Kris Riau asked, is there any truth to the rumor of a new airport for Orange County? Eric Freed replied, no. -18- NAC ROSTER March 14, 2007 NAME ORGANIZATION Eric Freed John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Irma Ortega John Wayne Airport David Chan John Wayne Airport Jim Sugden John Wayne Airport Greg Carroll SAH Project/OCDA-Vice Chair PAC Tim Stoaks SAH Project/OCDA-PAC Nancy Alston AIR FAIR-East Bluff resident Charles Griffin AIR FAIR-East Bluff resident Cherie Weber AIR FAIR-The Bluffs Home Assn. Melinda Seely AIR FAIR Reina Kapadia City of Tustin Homer Bludau City of Newport Beach Kris Riau Resident, City of North Tustin -19- NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: April 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 138 Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-SS: 324 '/2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-8N:17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-lON:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (July 1, 2006 -June 30, 2007). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- ri JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS) LOCATION MAP 0 1 2 3 4 5 Scale In miles A ~F JWAdivisionProject/Govt&CommRelotion/abnomost.dgn -2- Figure -3- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS ~11r1~ - ~1 InG ~nm Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Average Daily Jet Pro O erations 2 Jet O erations A ril 8,520 329 2,946 28,138 382 Ma 8,819 339 3,018 29,733 382 June 8,413 338 3,282 29,068 390 Second Quarter 25,752 1,006 9,246 86,939 385 Twelve Months 07/01 /06 - 06/30/07 101,060 4,005 36,195 343,572 376 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) April -June 2007 25,752 50,883 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 Number of Operations ', NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending June 30, 2007, 75 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this is the same number of dwelling units in -4- siz~ro~ the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending June 30, 2007. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the "Noise Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program, approximately 77 general agriculture (A-1) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAIP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym "SAH AIP".) During the 2nd quarter of 2007, no additional residences have been made compatible through the County's SAH AIP. A total of 486 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AIP. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (April 1, 2007 -June 30, 2007) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period April 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007, the Office received 344 complaints from citizens. This is a 92.2% increase from the 179 complaints received last quarter. It is a 3.9% decrease from the 358 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY i 140 ~ 120 i 100 i 80 60 40 20 0 116 39 36 25 18 21 12 10 6 12 7 6 10 8 1 2 2 2 4 1 1 1 3 1 .~~ ~a J~a ac ac 5a ,c~5 ~~~ or ~~ or Sy o5~ ~y or ;~~~ or oa e~ ~a ~5 ;~~~ ~'~ as e ~a , 5 ~` ~` o •\o, ~ ~a J~ oa 1` oc ,~1` oa ,`J5 oa y~o Or aP 2~~r ~J5 0~0 ~~~ ar ~5 ~~ ~~ e~ ~` 0 5 ~ Q.. ~ a ~ o ~ 0 r ~. o P~ oa o~~ ~ p yea ~ ~a ~o~ ~ ca ~J~ ~e o~ ~~ ~. ot` ol` ~a~ ~ ~ ~ o,~a ar a o~° c°~ Go ova ~So, ao,J ~,a ~,a ~' ~,o o~Q ~ aQ. ~ ~aoo G Go G ~J~ ~ ~ ~~. ~a ~~ Community -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 7/06 through 6/07 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Ju12006 67.9 66.1 65.7 58.2 57.6 59.4 56.3 68.9 43.1 56.6 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Aug 2006 68.2 66.5 66.1 58.7 58.0 59.9 55.8 69.3 44.1 57.3 # Da s 31 31 31 31 25 31 31 31 31 31 Sep 2006 67.8 66.0 65.4 58.1 57.2 59.1 55.1 68.7 45.0 56.7 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Q-3 2006 68.0 66.2 65.8 58.4 57.6 59.5 55.8 69.0 44.1 56.9 # Days 92 92 92 92 86 92 92 92 91 92 Oct 2006 67.6 65.8 65.4 58.5 57.7 59.5 55.9 68.7 46.4 57.2 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Nov 2006 67.6 66.1 65.6 58.3 57.6 59.7 55.7 68.8 46.5 57.2 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 Dec 2006 66.7 65.2 65.2 57.4 56.7 59.5 54.9 68.1 46.4 55.9 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Q-4 2006 67.3 65.7 65.4 58.1 57.4 59.6 55.5 68.6 46.4 56.8 # Days 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 91 92 Jan 2007 65.5 64.0 65.5 57.0 55.8 60.4 53.9 67.5 45.3 55.4 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 22 31 31 31 Feb 2007 67.5 66.1 65.4 58.7 58.1 59.7 56.3 68.9 45.1 57.5 # Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 23 28 27 28 Mar 2007 67.2 65.9 66.1 58.1 57.6 60.4 55.4 68.6 46.9 57.0 # Da s 31 31 31 27 31 31 31 31 27 31 Q-12007 66.8 65.4 65.7 58.0 57.2 60.2 55.3 68.4 45.8 56.7 # Days 90 90 90 86 90 90 76 90 85 90 Apr 2007 67.5 66.1 65.6 58.9 58.3 59.9 56.1 69.0 42.5 57.8 # Da ~s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 27 30 May 2007 67.8 66.2 65.7 58.9 58.2 59.8 55.8 68.8 42.7 57.7 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Jun 2007 68.3 66.5 66.1 59.1 58.2 60.0 55.8 69.3 43.8 57.5 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 Q-2 2007 67.9 66.3 65.8 59.0 58.2 59.9 55.9 69.0 43.1 57.6 # Da s 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 85 91 Q-3 2006 t hru Q-2 2007 Total 67.5 65.9 65.7 58.4 57.6 59.8 55.6 68.7 45.1 57.0 # Days 365 365 365 361 359 365 351 365 352 365 Q-2 2006 t hru Q-1 2007 (Previous 4 Quarte rs) Total 67.5 65.9 65.6 58.3 57.6 59.8 55.8 68.7 45.5 57.0 # Days 365 365 365 361 359 365 342 365 356 365 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 -0.5 0.0 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION April 2007 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.7 66.2 65.7 58.7 57.6 60.3 56.4 69.0 40.1 56.4 2 68.2 66.7 66.0 59.8 58.4 60.2 56.0 69.1 45.6 58.2 3 67.9 66.1 65.9 59.5 58.0 .59.8 55.4 68.7 45.0 57.7 4 67.9 66.5 65.7 59.0 58.5 59.9 56.3 69.6 32.3 58.6 5 68.3 66.9 66.6 59.6 59.3 60.4 56.3 69.9 #N/A 59.4 6 68.1 66.7 65.8 59.9 59.6 60.4 56.2 69.4 39.2 59.4 7 66.3 64.9 64.4 58.0 58.1 58.8 54.9 66.9 44.8 56.5 8 67.0 65.5 65.0 59.1 58.1 59.6 56.3 69.2 34.6 58.3 9 68.0 66.4 66.1 60.3 59.6 60.9 57.4 69.3 37.0 58.4 10 67.5 66.1 65.4 59.6 58.8 60.2 56.7 68.6 43.7 56.9 11 67.5 66.4 65.7 60.0 59.2 60.3 57.1 70.2 32.6 59.5 12 66.4 65.4 66.3 57.6 58.5 61.5 56.5 68.7 46.1 55.8 13 66.8 65.8 65.1 57.6 57.5 58.7 54.6 69.3 45.0 56.3 14 65.9 64.4 63.7 34.4 56.4 57.5 55.0 67.2 28.1 56.2 15 67.6 66.3 66.3 59.5 58.9 60.9 57.4 69.6 40.0 58.8 16 67.7 66.0 65.4 59.9 58.5 60.2 56.9 69.0 36.3 58.0 17 67.0 65.4 64.7 59.1 57.5 59.5 54.7 69.5 29.9 59.1 18 67.1 66.7 65.7 57.8 58.8 59.3 57.4 67.8 36.1 56.4 19 67.6 65.8 65.8 58.8 57.9 59.4 55.8 69.3 46.7 57.3 20 68.6 67.2 66.6 60.3 59.3 60.8 56.7 69.5 43.6 59.1 21 65.6 64.1 63.1 57.7 56.5 58.4 50.8 66.3 41.1 55.2 22 68.6 67.5 66.9 60.3 59.8 61.4 57.6 69.9 45.4 59.5 23 67.8 66.2 65.3 59.1 58.6 59.8 56.5 68.8 46.7 57.7 24 67.3 66.0 65.2 58.5 58.0 59.0 55.8 68.6 #N/A 56.8 25 67.5 66.5 66.2 60.0 58.4 60.3 57.0 68.8 44.8 56.9 26 68.5 66.9 66.5 59.9 59.3 61.2 57.2 69.4 43.2 57.0 27 68.5 67.0 66.7 59.5 58.9 60.3 57.0 69.1 30.8 56.2 28 65.7 63.8 62.8 55.3 54.7 56.0 52.4 66.4 #N/A 54.5 29 67.4 65.7 65.0 57.4 56.5 57.9 53.8 69.3 31.8 57.8 30 68.1 66.5 65.6 58.1 57.5 59.5 53.7 69.1 41.6 58.8 Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 27 30 En.Av 67.5 66.1 65.6 58.9 58.3 59.9 56.1 69.0 42.5 57.8 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION May 2007 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.6 65.9 65.2 59.1 57.8 60.8 55.0 69.1 39.4 58.4 2 67.8 66.6 65.9 59.4 58.9 60.4 56.6 69.5 35.1 58.4 3 68.7 67.2 66.9 60.1 59.7 61.3 57.4 68.6 42.5 56.4 4 68.5 67.0 65.7 59.7 58.9 60.5 57.0 69.8 36.7 59.4 5 66.1 64.5 63.8 57.8 56.8 58.6 55.8 66.4 46.2 54.8 6 64.9 64.3 64.8 54.6 55.3 59.2 52.4 67.0 43.0 52.9 7 65.8 64.0 65.0 54.9 54.9 59.2 53.7 66.7 45.6 54.0 8 66.3 64.9 63.8 55.5 55.8 57.6 53.3 67.0 39.5 54.2 9 67.5 66.0 65.1 58.5 57.0 59.3 55.2 68.4 28.5 56.8 10 68.0 66.7 66.1 58.1 58.0 59.5 55.6 69.3 47.3 56.7 11 68.4 66.8 65.7 58.8 58.2 59.4 55.7 69.0 40.6 56.9 12 66.0 64.3 63.4 57.7 56.3 57.6 54.5 66.4 39.6 55.0 13 67.1 65.7 65.2 58.7 57.8 59.5 56.0 68.6 #N/A 55.8 14 68.3 66.4 66.0 59.2 58.2 60.1 56.0 70.0 41.7 58.2 15 67.7 66.1 65.6 58.9 58.4 59.2 54.9 68.8 32.7 58.1 16 68.4 66.9 65.7 59.4 58.7 60.5 55.4 69.7 41.4 59.0 17 68.9 67.1 67.0 59.7 59.2 60.7 56.9 70.0 41.2 59.3 18 68.8 67.1 66.3 59.3 58.2 59.8 55.7 69.3 #N/A 58.9 19 66..6 64.7 64.4 57.7 56.5 58.1 53.4 66.6 41.4 55.3 20 68.7 66.6 66.5 59.7 59.1 59.9 55.1 69.5 35.5 59.2 21 68.4 66.5 66.0 60.0 59.1 60.5 56.8 69.2 45.2 58.7 22 68.2 66.5 66.0 59.9 58.8 60.3 57.5 69.1 39.4 58.7 23 68.6 67.3 66.8 60.1 59.4 61.0 57.3 69.2 46.9 58.8 24 68.9 67.1 66.7 59.2 59.1 60.5 56.7 69.8 37.3 58.8 25 68.9 67.1 66.8 59.9 59.6 60.9 56.7 70.1 47.5 59.8 26 66.7 64.8 64.1 57.6 56.7 58.0 53.8 66.6 45.7 55.8 27 65.5 63.9 63.3 57.0 55.9 57.8 53.3 68.1 39.7 56.8 28 67.8 66.1 65.7 59.9 58.4 60.0 56.3 69.6 42.7 58.5 29 68.3 66.6 66.1 59.6 58.7 59.8 56.4 69.3 38.0 57.1 30 67.7 66.7 65.8 60.1 58.9 59.7 56.5 69.2 43.6 57.7 31 68.6 67.0 66.3 59.9 59.3 60.9 57.1 69.5 41.6 58.4 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 En.Av 67.8 66.2 65.7 58.9 58.2 59.8 55.8 68.8 42.7 57.7 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION June 2007 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 68.2 66.7 66.0 60.0 58.9 60.5 56.7 69.8 49.5 58.4 2 66.4 64.2 64.0 57.4 56.1 58.5 52.7 66.8 39.3 56.7 3 68.0 66.5 65.2 58.1 57.8 58.6 54.9 69.8 40.7 59.1 4 68.0 66.5 66.5 58.6 57.8 59.2 54.5 69.3 33.0 58.4 5 68.1 66.2 65.6 58.5 57.7 59.0 55.2 69.6 44.0 58.6 6 67.7 66.1 65.7 59.7 58.8 60.4 56.9 69.6 41.8 58.1 7 68.9 66.6 66.9 60.1 59.2 61.0 57.4 69.6 48.4 57.7 8 68.5 66.4 66.0 59.9 58.6 60.3 57.6 69.8 44.4 58.2 9 66.6 64.8 64.1 58.1 57.4 58.1 54.9 67.4 41.4 55.8 10 67.9 66.1 65.8 59.5 58.6 60.3 56.1 69.1 36.5 58.3 11 68.4 66.2 66.0 59.6 58.6 59.8 55.9 69.8 48.0 59.3 12 68.1 66.4 66.2 59.2 58.5 60.0 56.2 69.8 41.7 58.0 13 68.2 66.7 66.4 59.1 58.3 59.9 55.9 69.2 43.8 57.7 14 68.8 66.7 66.6 59.3 58.2 60.9 56.4 69.6 42.4 57.4 15 68.8 67.1 66.7 59.7 58.8 60.3 56.6 69.8 44.5 57.8 16 67.1 65.2 64.7 58.3 57.2 58.9 54.0 68.1 42.6 56.0 17 67.9 66.2 65.7 59.1 58.1 60.0 55.6 69.9 #N/A 58.0 18 69.0 67.0 66.4 60.3 59.0 61.0 54.8 69.9 34.6 58.2 19 68.7 66.9 66.5 59.6 58.4 60.1 53.6 69.5 44.0 57.1 20 68.5 67.1 66.2 57.8 57.4 58.6 53.8 69.3 46.7 56.0 21 69.3 67.6 67.0 59.0 58.5 59.9 56.5 69.8 44.8 57.3 22 68.8 67.1 66.3 59.2 58.0 60.0 55.9 69.1 36.7 56.7 23 67.6 65.7 65.3 58.3 57.0 59.1 56.3 67.9 46.5 55.5 24 68.0 66.4 66.3 59.0 58.1 60.0 55.9 69.2 44.3 56.4 25 69.0 67.2 66.7 59.4 58.7 60.2 55.7 69.4 41.6 57.5 26 68.4 66.5 65.8 58.8 58.0 59.6 55.6 69.2 42.4 57.3 27 68.7 66.8 66.6 58.9 58.2 60.5 55.8 69.1 41.1 56.7 28 69.5 67.3 67.1 60.1 59.0 61.4 57.0 69.7 41.0 57.2 29 69.1 67.3 67.0 59.8 59.1 61.6 57.2 69.9 44.8 57.5 30 67.6 65.5 65.5 58.4 57.0 61.1 55.1 67.6 29.0 55.3 Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 En.Av 68.3 66.5 66.1 59.1 58.2 60.0 55.8 69.3 43.8 57.5 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A A.,ril _ li inc ~nm Carrier AC Type # Deps _r. __ NMS Site 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9N 1 Alaska Air 7374 577 verage 95.7 93.9 93.0 86.3 87.4 87.7 5. 4. 81. 1. Count 567 563 557 553 567 545 550 6 2 7 B7377 436 Average 92.7 91.3 88.8 81.8 83.7 84.0 81.5 91.6 #N/A 80.1 Count 428 428 427 419 427 417 414 7 0 6 B7378 132 Average 95.2 93.6 91.6 84.5 86.1 86.4 84.3 95.5 #N/A 82.5 Count (130) (129) (130) (128) (127) (128) (124) (2) (0) (2) Aloha B7377 504 Average 95.4 93.2 91.3 85.4 84.7 86.7 83.3 92.9 81.8 78.3 Count {493) (484) (486) (487) (487) (471) (442) (8) (3) (5) America West A320 773 Average 92.4 91.4 90.8 85.7 84.4 85.2 81.6 89.7 #N/A 78.7 Count 757 750 749 745 743 738 626 12 0 4 B7373 152 Average 95.0 93.2 91.6 85.7 84.8 86.4 82.9 91.8 78.9 81.3 Count 147 148 149 149 149 143 140 2 2 2 8757 104 Average 94.9 94.4 91.5 84.7 83.9 85.4 81.2 91.7 81.1 83.5 Count (103) (103) (101) (101) (98) (93) (77) (1) (1) (1) American B7378 847 Average 99.2 96.9 96.3 89.0 87.6 89.3 85.1 92.6 78.7 80.8 Count 824 816 821 806 817 785 797 15 2 7 B757 321 Average 96.2 94.5 93.1 86.9 86.7 88.4 84.7 88.1 #N/A 79.0 Count (316) (312) (312) (310) (313) (305) (310) (4) (0) (2 MD80 262 Average 100.5 99.1 98.9 92.4 92.0 93.7 90.4 98.0 83.4 85.8 Count (254) (253) (249) (252) (252) (249) (249) (3) (3) (3) Continental B7373 1 Average 96.5 93.5 93.9 90.7 86.5 90.1 86.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1 (1) (1) (0) (0) 0) B7377 734 Average 96.0 94.0 92.9 86.2 85.1 86.7 83.1 93.9 79.3 79.1 Count 715 704 709 704 707 674 692 17 6 8 B7378 3 Average 98.2 95.8 94.0 88.4 87.1 89.4 86.3 95.1 79.6 82.3 Count (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (1) (1) Delta B7378 15 Average 94.9 92.9 91.5 85.9 85.1 87.1 83.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 0 0 0 6757 407 Average 96.7 94.7 94.5 87.7 86.7 87.5 84.0 92.1 78.1 #N/A Count 390 388 389 385 390 378 388 12 1 0 MD90 249 Average 91.2 89.8 89.8 82.6 82.4 84.7 81.8 89.9 #N/A 77.1 Count (243) (240) (240) (227) (227) (230) (216) (4) (0) (2) FedEx A300 29 Average 97.8 96.1 94.8 88.5 89.1 89.6 86.8 96.8 #N/A 83.3 Count 28 28 28 27 28 26 28 1 0 1 A310 35 Average 97.6 96.0 94.8 88.7 89.4 90.1 86.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (35) (35) (34) (35) (35) (35) (34) (0) (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A318 1 Average 92.1 90.7 91.0 86.2 84.9 85.1 80.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 A319 348 Average 93.8 91.7 92.2 86.6 85.6 86.3 82.3 89.5 78.7 78.8 Count (343) (340) (341) (341) (341) (330) (311) (4) (1) (4) Mesa Airlines CRJ9 168 Average 92.3 90.8 92.5 84.5 82.6 85.6 80.0 91.8 #N/A 83.2 Count (165) (164) (164) (162) (160) (164) (133) (1) (0) (1) Northwest A320 260 Average 96.1 93.9 93.6 87.0 85.7 86.5 82.5 89.6 #N/A 81.7 Count (255) (253) (253) (252) (254) (246) (239) (4) (0) (2) Southwest B7373 1 Average 96.0 93.5 91.8 88.5 83.7 86.3 83.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 B7377 361 Average 92.7 91.2 88.6 82.4 81.8 82.8 80.2 91.6 80.8 77.8 Count (354) (353) (356) (339) (346) (348) (313) (5) (1) (1) United A320 658 Average 92.0 90.7 91.1 85.5 84.1 85.9 83.4 87.5 #N/A 74.4 Count 646 644 639 635 641 628 623 8 0 1 B7373 17 Average 95.3 93.7 92.3 86.5 85.7 86.9 83.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 17 16 17 15 16 17 16 0 0 0 B757 408 Average 94.4 92.6 91.8 85.0 84.9 86.6 83.2 91.0 79.1 80.1 Count (398) (391) (400) (390) (396) (389) (387) (6) (2) (4) UPS 8757 62 Average 95.6 94.2 92.8 85.9 84.8 86.2 81.7 92.8 #N/A 73.9 Count (61) (59) (60) (61) (61) (61) (55) (1) (0) (1) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E April -June 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Si te 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A as a it 7 7 341 Average 91. 90.3 7.9 81.2 83.1 83.1 8 .7 0. 7 . Count (334) (333) (334) (321) (332) (324) (306) (6) (1) (2) America West A320 66 Average 89.6 89.4 89.0 84.2 83.0 83.1 79.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (65) (66) (64) (65) (63) (64) (35) (0) (0) (0) Southwest B7377 3071 Average 91.1 90.0 86.7 82.0 81.2 82.2 79.5 90.1 78.7 76.5 Count (3014) (2990) (2998) (2907) (2956) (2930) (2567) (43) (9) (18) United 6757 174 Average 91.8 90.6 89.0 82.9 82.4 84.2 81.9 88.5 81.6 76.1 Count (167) (166) (164) (160) (161) (161) (163) (5) (1) (2) -11- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter April -June 2007 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9N 10N American agle 140 997 Average 87.1 85.6 88. 0. 78. 81.7 .1 5. N Count (978) (973) (967) (843) (634) (944) (84) (16) (0) (0) SkyWest CL60 161 Average 86.0 83.5 87.9 79.0 78.3 80.9 80.4 85.8 #N/A #N/A Count 156 156 155 80 28 152 4 3 0 0 CRJ7 197 Average 88.6 87.2 87.3 81.2 79.4 82.2 79.0 88.0 #N/A #N/A Count (192) (194) (194) (166) (101) (188) 119) 3) (0) (0) E120 503 Average 82.0 82.4 82.4 79.9 81.4 78.8 80.4 81.7 79.2 74.2 Count (488) (477) (483) (70) (271) (434) (52) (8) (1) (1) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation April -June 2007 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site enera viation et verage Count (3778) (3707) .5 (3714) (2271) (1723) (3244) (1226) (86) (3) (11) -12- TABLE 9 A TR ('' AR R TFR (~PF.R ATTONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Alaska Air AS B7374 4,850 7,961 7,130 7,188 2,338 B7377 7,089 4,286 4,439 4,657 3,099 B7378 128 2 383 Aloha A B7377 10 3, 9 3,685 3,936 2,006 America West AW A319 2,883 1,201 2,364 3,659 1,933 A320 2,955 3,390 3,050 2,132 1,341 B7373 3,184 2,559 2,746 2,271 556 B757 26 2 755 1,091 539 American AA B7378 4,663 9,226 6,896 6,737 3,347 B757 7,612 691 1,996 2,673 1,266 MD80 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,981 1,361 Continental CO B7373 2 4 B7375 1,640 1,303 1,767 1,812 53 B7377 3,378 3,689 3,529 3,711 2,653 B7378 4 12 4 6 B757 4 Delta DL B7373 1,016 1,243 7 1 B7378 878 87 131 280 44 B757 2,503 4,077 3,859 3,264 1,608 MD90 2,597 1,524 1,572 1,841 1,005 FedEx FM A300 26 20 4 96 144 A310 476 481 496 405 112 a300 2 a310 2 1 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 70 1,114 13 9 A319 379 1,022 1,034 2,139 1,221 B7373 214 1,046 2 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 2,266 456 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 1,325 666 Midwest YX B717 302 1,210 238 Northwest NW A319 2,790 2,814 2,793 2,073 1,020 A320 57 38 40 48 7 Southwest WN B7373 252 176 2 402 20 B7375 8,231 1,358 2 B7377 10,498 19,745 22,022 24,146 13,698 UP 5X B757 448 472 476 480 250 US Airways US A319 895 A320 4 United UA A319 2,211 1,556 1,760 2,172 1,996 A320 2,403 3,173 2,086 1,399 436 B7373 10 9 2 72 B7375 8 8 34 B757 6,492 6,498 5,800 6,126 2,484 -13- TABLE 10 ATR(''RAFT (IPFR ATT(~NAT, HISTORY Aircraft Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 A300 26 20 4 98 144 A310 476 481 498 406 112 A318 2 70 1,114 13 9 A319 9,158 6,593 7,951 10,043 6,170 A320 5,419 6, 601 5,176 3, 579 1, 784 B717 302 1,210 238 B7373 3,660 4,808 3,995 2,756 577 B7374 4,850 7,961 7,130 7,188 2,338 B7375 9,879 2,661 1,769 1,820 87 B7377 23,875 31,119 33,675 36,450 21,456 B7378 5,545 9,313 7,167 7,023 3,780 B757 17,085 11,740 12,886 13,634 6,147 CL60 2,266 456 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 1,325 666 MD80 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,981 1,361 MD90 2,597 1,524 1,572 1,841 1,005 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY I!, 40,000 ~; 35,000 30,000 I, 25,000 20,000 ', 15,000 10,000 ~, 5,000 0 ^ 2003 ^ 2004 O 2005 ' ~ 2006 ^ 2007 P~~o P~~o P~^~ P~~~ P~~o 0~~~ 1~ 1~` 1~ 1~ 1~ h~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~1~ ~1~ ~1 By Year ~~O ~~~ OHO OHO G G ~S ~S -14- TABLE 11 ATR (''ARRTFR AVER A(^TF. T)ATT.Y T)EPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Alaska Air AS B7374 6.644 10.866 9.770 9.838 6.475 B7377 9.710 5.863 6.085 6.386 8.547 B7378 0.175 0.003 1.061 Aloha AQ B7377 3.984 4.645 5.058 5.386 5.547 America West AW A319 3.937 1.634 3.244 5.008 5.337 A320 4.047 4.634 4.178 2.934 3.696 B7373 4.373 3.495 3.762 3.110 1.541 B757 0.036 0.003 1.033 1.493 1.497 American AA B7378 6.386 12.609 9.452 9.227 9.243 B757 10.430 0.945 2.734 3.666 3.497 MD80 1.433 3.852 3.433 2.721 3.757 Continental CO B7373 0.003 0.003 B7375 2.247 1.781 2.436 2.490 0.144 B7377 4.627 5.038 4.819 5.082 7.331 B7378 0.005 0.016 0.005 0.017 B757 0.005 Delta DL B7373 1.385 1.704 0.011 B7378 1.200 0.120 0.181 0.384 0.122 B757 3.425 5.571 5.290 4.474 4.459 MD90 3.562 2.082 2.153 2.518 2.779 FedEx FM A300 0.036 0.027 0.005 0.132 0.398 A310 0.652 0.656 0.677 0.556 0.309 a300 0.003 a310 0.003 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 0.003 0.096 1.526 0.019 0.022 A319 0.518 1.393 1.416 2.929 3.376 B7373 0.293 1.432 0.003 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 3.104 0.623 0.003 CRJ9 3.238 1.995 1.816 1.840 Midwest YX B717 0.414 1.650 0.326 Northwest NW A319 3.822 3.844 3.827 2.841 2.818 A320 0.079 0.052 0.055 0.066 0.022 Southwest WN B7373 0.345 0.240 0.003 0.551 0.055 B7375 11.279 1.855 0.003 B7377 14.378 26.975 30.173 33.088 37.840 UP 5X B757 0.614 0.645 0.652 0.658 0.691 US Airways US A319 1.227 A320 0.005 United UA A319 3.038 2.126 2.416 2.984 5.486 A320 3.279 4.331 2.852 1.912 1.243 B7373 0.014 0.011 0.003 0.099 B7375 0.011 0.011 0.094 B757 8.896 8.891 7.945 8.395 6.862 -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: June 13, 2007 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Airport Statistics David Chan presented the statistics from the JWA Airport Statistics Report for May 2007, and copies were distributed to attendees. 2. Additional topic discussions and/or comments and questions Nancy Alston asked about the number of flights, and passenger load factors. Eric Freed explained that the number of Class A average daily departures (ADDs) is a set amount, and since Class E departures are not regulated, they are controlled by the number of seats allocated, and that passenger load factors are tracked closely by the Access and Noise Office. Ms. Alston wanted to continue discussing this subject with the Airport Director. Charles Griffin asked how are we approaching air quality requirements. Eric Freed responded that JWA has staff in the facilities department dedicated to environmental issues, and that JWA meets or exceeds all federal and state requirements. Nancy Alston stated that she had received a complaint about Airport Monitor pertaining to the aircraft ID information not appearing. Eric Freed responded that JWA is aware of this problem and is working with the FAA to have it corrected. Charles Griffin asked if JWA was going to have GPS air traffic control equipment installed. Eric Freed responded that the JWA noise office is not aware of any near term plans to install such equipment. Charles Griffin added that he believes the FAA will be responsible for installing any ground based equipment, but air carriers will need to upgrade their fleets to accommodate the new GPS system. Greg Carroll asked if the CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) is changing. Eric Freed responded that it expands and contracts from quarter to quarter, and it is a bit larger now, as operations have increased over the past few years. Greg Carroll asked if GA (General Aviation) operations are included in the CNEL. David Chan responded, yes, all aircraft operations are included. Nancy Alston requested more information on how CNEL is calculated. Eric Freed responded -16- that the JWA Noise Office would supply that information. 1VIs. Alston stated that she would follow-up with her contact information. Greg Carroll asked if GA touch-and-goes are counted. Eric Freed responded that each is counted as an arrival and a departure. Greg Carroll asked who imposes the weight restrictions on baggage. Jim Sugden responded that each air carver imposes their own policies on baggage weight. Greg Carroll asked how much GA area will be lost due to airport construction. Eric Freed responded that GA will remain whole, just relocated. Charles Griffin asked if we could move the engine run-up area near 73 freeway. Eric Freed responded that the JWA operations department would be able to answer that question. -17- NAC ROSTER June 13, 2007 NAME ORGANIZATION Eric Freed John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Irma Ortega John Wayne Airport David Chan John Wayne Airport Jim Sugden John Wayne Airport Homer Bludau City of Newport Beach Greg Carroll SAH Project/OCDA-Vice Chair PAC Nancy Alston AIR FAIR-East Bluff resident Charles Griffin AIR FAIR-East Bluff resident Melinda Seely AIR FAIR Marlene McDermatt Resident, Emerald Bay -18-